Tag: Agenda

  • Agenda for new minister from Abia

    SIR: “May I wholeheartedly acknowledge the former Minister for Industries, Trade and Investments, Dr. Okechukwu Enelamah who I proclaim a worthy son of Abia State for his painstaking efforts in attracting developments to Abia State.”

    The above is an excerpt from the inaugural speech of Dr. Okezie Victor Ikpeazu, Governor of Abia State during his inauguration for a Second Term on May 29. That commendation may seem unprecedented within the context of the hostile nature of opposition politics in Nigeria, but the truth is that it highlighted the class of the two individuals involved.

    Dr. Enelamah was outstanding for Abia State. As far as he was concerned, the development of his state came before partisan considerations. He was a strong champion for the Enyimba Economic City and other key Investment initiatives of the administration of Governor Ikpeazu. Dr. Enelamah supported the Made in Aba promotion campaign by ensuring that all the Parastatals under his ministry gave priority attention to Aba and left no stone unturned to support the industrialisation of the State.

    The cooperation he extended to the government of Abia State was in spite of their differences in party affiliation. When it was time for politicking, Dr. Enelamah mobilised for his party and worked substantially for the decent showing of his party the APC, in Abia State but as a high-minded individual, he never conflated politics with development.

    Although he never for one day set foot inside Government House, Umuahia, he was a dependable partner in the development of Abia State. Unobtrusive, not given to ostentation and unnecessary power shows, he was a gentleman to the core. That was why the governor was effusive in his praise of the former minister on a day as auspicious as his Second Term inauguration.

    Today, another candidate has been nominated by President Muhammadu Buhari as Minister to represent Abia State at the Federal Executive Council. He is Dr. Uchechukwu Ogah, the governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress in the 2019 elections. It has therefore become imperative to set agenda for Dr Ogah as he prepares to take the exalted office.

    As a unit, the Abia State Government welcomes the nomination of Dr. Ogah as the Minister representing Abia State at the Federal Executive Council. We have no doubt that he has what it takes to excel in the role. I have read congratulatory messages from the Commissioner for Information, Chief John Kalu and the Chief Press Secretary to the Governor Mr. Onyebuchi Ememanka which tells me that the Abia State Government is willing and ready to work with Dr. Ogah in a collective bid to develop the State.

    I am also aware that in his inaugural address, Governor Ikpeazu stated thus “… it is on that note that I wish to once again, call on all those who contested the governorship election with me to come and join hands with me so that together, we can work for the benefit of Abians”.

    There is no better platform for Dr. Ogah at this moment than to join hands with Dr. Ikpeazu to work for the benefit of Abians as he assumes his next office. The bar for outstanding cooperation between the Governor and the Minister from Abia State has already been set high by the relationship that existed between Dr. Ikpeazu and Dr. Enelamah.

    It is therefore expected that Dr. Ogah will adopt the existing template and build upon it. The first four-year tenure of Governor Ikpeazu saw a bipartisan atmosphere of peace between the governor and all categories of leaders in the state. From Legislators in Abuja to the Minister from Abia State to Heads of Federal Parastatals to Commissioners Representing Abia State on various Boards and Commissions, it was a smooth relationship all through. Governor Ikpeazu bears no grudge or ill will towards any individual and it would not be healthy to sow seeds of discord at this point.

    Dr. Uchechukwu Ogah is therefore invited to accept the hand of fellowship offered him by Governor Ikpeazu and work with him to bring development to Abia State in any portfolio he will be operating from.

    Dr. Ogah is also invited to ignore the antics of professional political jobbers who will want him to use his office as a launching pad for attacks and power tussle with the governor. He should be high-minded enough to separate politics from development. Development must come before politics at all times if indeed the good of the people is the underlying motivation for our politics. All politicians at all levels of government must learn this lesson, but this is even the more important for a state as desirous of making progress as Abia.

     

    • Sam Hart is the Special Adviser to the Governor of Abia State on Communications
  • Agenda for incoming minister

    As Captain Hadi Sirika steps down today as Minister of State, Aviation; his stewardship in the industry has thrown up more questions than answers in an industry in search of leadership. Sirika’s efforts to navigate around uncompleted airports and air navigation projects; unfulfilled promises on the national carrier; lingering industrial disharmony and intrigues over concession of airports remain defining. The new minister of aviation will, no doubt, have a daunting task in the drive to reposition the industry, KELVIN OSA OKUNBOR reports.

    It is time for stock taking as Captain Hadi Sirika steps down today  as the  Minister of State, Aviation. His stepping down as helmsman of the aviation industry comes as the curtain is drawn on the first term of the Muhammadu Buhari administration  which has promised the next level as the President is inaugurated for the second term in office.

    The near four-year tenure of Sirika  as Minister in charge of Aviation witnessed a flurry of activities ranging from the sublime to the ridiculous at a time government is desirous to position the aviation sector as a catalyst of socio – economic development.

    His performance has been has been a mixed bag as the pilot turn politician straddled between rhetorics and action in delivering the promise  of the  administration to utilise aviation as an economic enabler to grow the gross domestic product and position Nigeria as an aviation hub for West and Central Africa regions.

    Experts say the utmost dream of the  industry remains unfulfilled   as many projects proposed by the administration are yet to come to fruition.

    To underscore the determination of the administration, Sirika at the twilight of the first term of the administration embarked on a hurried inauguration of projects aimed at fixing infrastructure gaps in the industry.

    Besides a few achievements by the administration, experts say as much as Sirika has contributed his best to development of the industry; the incoming minister of aviation must consider giving priority to the controversial national carrier.

     

    Controversy over National

    Carrier

    The reason, the incoming minister in charge of aviation must consider the national carrier deeply is rooted in the division in the positions taken by the Minister of Transportation, Chibuike Ameachi and his aviation counterpart.

    While Amaechi said the outgoing Federal Executive Council was divided over the modalities to adopt and government equity in the proposed carrier, Sirika said the project was on course without giving details of the transactions concerning the project.

    Rotimi Amaechi, the Minister of Transportation, has said the Federal Executive Council was  confused if it was to  establish a national carrier.

    He said: “On national carrier, (the) cabinet is divided on the issue of modality.There are those who believe that the Federal Government should invest and then we can sell the equity later.

    “There are also those who believe that no, and from day one they say let us get investors in and give them the franchise of Nigeria Airways or Air Nigeria or whatever is called. That is where we are and that is what held it down. But as for whether it is still in our plan, it is and has not been abandoned.”

    In what may appear different, Sirika said  plans were underway by the Federal Government to revisit the national carrier project.

    He said that the ministry only suspended the project to put adequate measures in place, promising that the project would be delivered soon.

    He said the project, which was President Muhammadu Buhari’s brainchild, would not be allowed to die.

    He expressed concern that despite being a huge aviation market, Nigeria could not boast of a national carrier.

    He said: “We have to suspend the earlier plans for the national carrier for strategic reasons. The move was not killed.

    “Provisions have to be made to continue to fund activities of advisers and so on, to ensure that it is delivered.

    “The carrier will be delivered within the life of this administration, this I can assure you.

    “It is not forgotten by government. It will continue and we are doing everything we can to deliver it,” he said.

    The minister, however, stated that the carrier would not be funded solely by government.

    “It is Public Private Partnership (PPP). The private sector will lead and deliver while the government will play its role.

    “Viability funding is also being addressed. After that, then the full business case which is the implementation stage. It is at that point that it will be advertised for people to come in and participate,” he said.

    He said that the process would be transparently done through local and international fora and media.

    He added that anybody who was interested in getting in information on funds spent and other processes was free to do so, stressing that the ministry would be willing to respond.

    The minister lamented that besides the huge revenue loss due to absence of a national carrier, Nigerians still pay exorbitantly to use air carriers belonging to other countries.

    He stated that consequently, President Muhammadu Buhari directed that the Viability Gap Funding for the project be provided for in the 2019 Appropriation, adding that the National Assembly had graciously done that.

     

    Uncompleted Airports Remodelling Projects

    Though government made efforts to fix some inadequate airport and air navigation facilities, experts say much is expected from the incoming minister of aviation, who should as a matter of priority rework the airports remodeling programme.

    Speaking in an interview, aviation consultant and Chief Executive Officer, Aglow Limited , Mr Tayo Ojuri said government should speed up construction of ahro- allied facilities including storage and logistics infrastructure at airports.

    He said doing this will improve the agro-allied value chain and position it to contribute significantly to the gross domestic product.

    He said the incoming minister of aviation must focus on commercialisation of airports to enable them attract investment in the export value chain for cargo and agricultural produce.

    Experts say the incoming minister should think out of the box on how to complete abandoned passenger and cargo terminals littering the country.

    Significantly, experts  say the government should focus energy on abandoned cargo airport terminals conceived in 2011 under the President Goodluck Jonathan administration.

    These projects, which have since been abandoned, were conceived to boost the non-oil sector as a huge foreign exchange spinner.

    The proposed perishable cargo terminals were earmarked for Abuja, Akure, Calabar, Ilorin, Jalingo, Jos, Kano, Lagos, Makurdi, Minna, Owerri, Port Harcourt and Uyo.

    These airports, which are in proximity to food baskets, were supposed to be developed with international standard perishable cargo facilities to enhance their operations.

    If the government accords priority to these projects, it will position Nigeria to key into the  over N250 billion yearly air freight export market in Africa.

    Experts said this would  put Nigeria on the same pedestal with countries, such as Kenya, South Africa, Benin, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, Senegal, Ethiopia, Tanzania and Egypt, which  are trading in commodities, including  fruits, fresh fish, vegetables and flowers.

    A cargo expert, Herbert Udenka, told The Nation that there was the need to adopt a strategy to tackle the problem.  “The strategy is, therefore, to create the much-needed storage infrastructure in view of the large volume involved and to facilitate the evacuation of agricultural produce to domestic markets in conformity with international standards.“

    On the infrastructure front, stakeholders say the incoming minister should accelerate the completion of some international airport terminals in Lagos, Enugu and Kano.

    The timely completion of these terminals funded by the $500 million loan provided by the Chinese Import-Export Bank will bridge the gap in airport infrastructure.

    In particular, they said the completion of these facilities will not only put Nigeria in the league of nations with modern airport infrastructure, but will make air travel seamless, safe and comfortable.

    The Association of Nigerian Aviation Professionals (ANAP) General Secretary, Comrade Abdulrasaq Siedu, said the incoming minister should encourage  FAAN to  ensure it completes  on time the new international terminals before the over $500 million loan from Chinese Import Export Bank is repaid.

    Industry watchers said the timely completion of the new International Terminal at the Murtala Muham-med International Airport (MMIA), Ikeja, Lagos would resolve challenges of congestion in the existing terminal, which has remained overstretched for many decades.

     

    Operators’ advice

    Speaking in an interview, Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON) Executive Chairman, Captain Nogie Meggison said for Nigeria to become a hub in Africa, the incoming minister must pursue an aggressive infrastructure revolution to make its airports attractive to airlines, passengers and other investors who are keen to invest in the sector.

    Meggison said it would not be out of place for the incoming minister to push for  the completion of the  new international airport terminal in Lagos before the end of the year.

    Also, speaking, Air Peace Chairman, Allen Onyema said the incoming minister must design a blueprint on how to fix inadequate screening and security facilities at airports. He said the incoming minister must focus on the single screening point at the Eastern Wing of the General Aviation Terminal (GAT), Lagos, which contributes to airlines delaying flights.

    Onyema said the incoming minister should mandate FAAN to consider expanding check-in and screening facilities at the domestic wing of the Lagos Airport to reduce the burden airlines and passengers’ experience.

    Besides, he said the incoming minister should ramp up efforts by aeronautical agencies in the provision of air-field lighting system and other flight navigation facilities at the airports to enable airlines utilise their aircraft maximally.

    Onyema said the incoming minister should do this : “ All we need is for the government to help us fight international aero-politics, this is what is lacking here. The moment government starts helping us by taking charge of the aero-politics, Nigerian airlines would get it right.

    “What these airlines need is the support of government to move forward. We are not asking government to give us money.”

     

  • Group sets agenda for Ogun transition team

    A group under the aegis of Noimot Salako-Oyedele (NSO) Frontiers has impressed on the Economic Transition Committee of Ogun State on the need to urgently rescue the gateway state from what it described as the shackles of misappropriation/mismanagement of resources and misplaced priorities caused by the present administration in the state.

    In a statement issued by the Director of Communications and Strategy of the NSO Frontiers, Muhammed Mustapha, the organisation urged the team which is raised, according to it, from among seasoned professionals of diverse fields to justify the confidence and trust reposed on them by the residents of Ogun State via the governor-elect.

    The organisation disclosed that having dispassionately perused composition of the economic transition team being put together by the governor-elect, its earlier belief and conviction that Ogun State would undergo rapid paradigm shift in terms of socio-economic and political transformation to join league of buoyant states in Nigeria has been reinforced.

    The statement also appreciated the governor-elect and his deputy for honouring NSO Frontiers by appointing Ismail Oluwole Obisanya (being its secretary/youth leader) as member of one of the work groups (education, youth and sports) of the economic transition team, stressing that the organisation would proffer necessary supports for its member specifically and the entire team by extension towards delivering on their terms of reference and desired results for common good of the state.

    “This is to express our profound gratitude to the Governor-elect of Ogun State, Prince (Dr) Dapo Abiodun, and his deputy, Engr (Mrs) Noimot Salako-Oyedele, for honouring NSO Frontiers by appointing one of us, Ismail Oluwole Obisanya, as member of the Education, Youth and Sports, a work group of the Economic Transition Committee of Ogun State.

    “We shall proffer necessary supports for our member specifically and the entire economic team by extension towards delivering on their terms of reference and desired results for common good of the state.

    “We hereby implore the entire team not to let down the governor-elect of Ogun State, his deputy and entire residents of the gateway state on the confidence and trust reposed in them and also task them to urgently rescue the state from the shackles of misappropriation/mismanagement of resources and misplaced priorities caused by the present administration in the state.”

  • Agenda for Buhari

    PRESIDENT Muhammadu Buhari may have been re-elected with a plurality that reinforces his confidence in his first term programmes and ideas, but he will be wise to look beyond the surface to find out why most of Nigeria’s social and economic indicators in fact regressed in his first term. The regressions have not been caused by his opponents, whether in the Southeast or Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), or even a substantial half of the Southwest and North Central, or some retired military generals, or the so-called pampered, thieving and implacable elite. Yes, all these groups have their faults and weaknesses, but they also have their legitimate right to be unalterably opposed to the president and his ideas. It is not unethical to detest the president and his ruling party, just as the president has the constitutional right to enunciate and find support for his programmes and policies. Neither position is immoral.

    After yesterday’s state polls, after the smoke has cleared and winners and losers have vented their anger and emotions, it may be time for the president to put together a transethnic team to study the statistical dynamics of his victory, including where he performed well and why, and where he struggled and why. He needs to humbly eschew his instinctive divisiveness an self-righteousness to interrogate the statistics of the 2019 elections, to discover what hidden or open messages they tell him about his person and policies, or what they reflect about his leadership, particularly his failings and strengths. More critically, he needs to find out what the polls say of the country he has been privileged to lead for four years, and what they are saying of the future in terms of its economy, politics and society. Poll statistics really say a lot. Let him dig and find out what they are saying. And then let him interact with the country he presides over and see whether, despite the interminable and sometimes sanguinary pull and push between ethnic, religious and class groups, Nigeria cannot find common grounds upon which to build a stable and prosperous future. Can he be trusted to engage these imperatives?

    Without prejudice to the outcome of the legal challenge his opponent in the presidential election, Atiku Abubakar, is mounting, it is not too early for the president to consider an agenda for himself. He does not have four years from this May to set the foundation for the future Nigerians anticipate. Had he set such a foundation in his first term, and planned to consolidate it in his second term, by 2023, the result would have been unmistakeable. But after floundering for much of his first term, probably due to his government’s lack of focus and rigour, not to say his combative and desultory approach to fighting social ills, he will now be pressed for time to appropriately realign the country and prepare it for a glorious future. If his unflattering antecedents are anything to go by, however, the outcome may already be settled. But the country must hold out hope that this time he can assemble the right patriotic team to think for his government outside the framework of ethnic and religious exceptionalism.

    Should such a team be assembled, it would mean that the president has given indication that he is willing to abjure his idiosyncratic narrowness that saw him respond warmly in his first term to the demands and perspectives of a section of the country, particularly the section he confessed gave him unalloyed support. It would also indicate that he is finally thinking about a legacy for his presidency, one that would plant him in the minds of Nigerians for generations to come. No one appears sure what is on the mind of the president, whether he genuinely understands the problems afflicting and dividing the country, or whether he is genuinely misguided due to the cultural contamination many like him have suffered as a result of their provincial backgrounds. Whatever the problem is, it is time for the president to attempt some redemption. Below are a few of the areas he needs to focus on in his second term, assuming that he can get a team to envision the future for and with him, and he can also conjure the open-mindedness needed to grasp the fundamentals of the real and lasting change the team would suggest.

     

    The economy

    Whether he likes to acknowledge it or not, President Buhari has not produced macroeconomic models for Nigeria. In the past few years, many conferences and workshops had been conducted to rethink the country’s economy. He was either an invited guest or they were done at his government’s behest. But there was no time he sat through the entire deliberations, not to talk of appreciating the issues discussed, or owning them in such a way that he would have an instinctive feel for the urgent economic problems confronting the country, the paradigms that drive them, sometimes misguidedly, and the panaceas needed to effect fundamental adjustments. They have fed schoolchildren in some states without minding the unfairness which that entailed for those not fed, and have implemented Tradermoni programme, probably because of the instant results it is judged capable of delivering. They have also implemented the TSA policy, substantially augmented tax revenue, promoted agriculture, instituted measures to engender ease of doing business, and engaged some reforms here and there. But neither these programmes nor other successes have so far have been built into a model consistent with the socio-economic needs of the country, a model implementable now and in the future, complete with timelines and measurable goals.

    President Buhari’s first year produced a welter of naive and contradictory economic policies that pushed the economy into recession. He blamed his predecessors, but analysts know what the real problems were. If the reformist Chinese leaders who effectively took over from Mao Zedong had preoccupied themselves with blaming their predecessors, Deng Xiaoping would not have created the economic model and foundations capable of supporting and driving the Chinese economic miracle that has become the envy of the world today. President Buhari has also blamed corruption; but corruption is merely a symptom of the disarticulation in the system, a system so dysfunctional that it would be wishful thinking to expect the tinkering so lauded by the president to lift Nigeria out of poverty into steady growth and development. Let President Buhari develop macroeconomic models for the country, and let the country interrogate them. More importantly, the president himself must understand the models and owned them.

     

    Politics

    Except the president is living in denial, there is no way he can stabilise and unite the country around common objectives without a deep and comprehensive rethinking of its structure. The country is structurally unbalanced, like a defective building. But the president, like many others, think that reworking the foundation would predispose the country to fractures, if not outright balkanisation. They are wrong, very wrong. By the time they honestly inquire into the conflicts that have convulsed the country since independence, they will be shocked to find out how misguided and unrealistic they have been all along. Apart from the herdsmen crisis that consistently provoked clashes and mayhem, partly due to the president’s irresolute approach to the problem and a reluctance to resolve the crisis with the required neutrality and thoughtfulness, Nigerians may just be discovering that the multicultural ideal propagated by some Western democracies are illusory and impracticable. In Nigeria, land and cultures are a spiritual ideal far more transcendental than even religion, regardless of shifting demographics.

    The rash of nationalist parties in Europe, some of them far-right parties consumed by nativist ideologies, is a reflection of the stridency of their insular politics unrestrained by their sophistication. Until the supposed threats that imbue these negative tendencies with life are dissipated, these extreme ideologies will continue to find relevance. It is unrealistic to suggest that Nigeria’s ethnic groups, many of them already embracing and promoting exclusionist politics and supremacist ideologies, can suddenly respond positively and commonsensically to placation and homilies. They will not. They will continue to guard their cultural turfs jealously, react violently to threats, whether they be from elections or from any other source, and engage in deadly struggles for national power and dominance. A thinking president will assume the presence of these predisposing factors rather than dismiss, and find the best ways to manage them. Until President Buhari comes to terms with what he must do to manage these fratricidal and centrifugal tendencies, the conflicts can only worsen until they become unmanageable. As competition for resources and land intensifies, the room for manoeuvre for a burgeoning population will probably shrink. President Buhari needs to find the statesmanlike wisdom to grapple with the country’s existential problems before the initiative is finally lost.

     

    Society

    Of all his failings, President Buhari’s most galling is his inability to envision a socially re-engineered Nigeria. The reasons are not far-fetched. He is ascetic, simple, almost a philistine, and probably religious to the point of worrisome excesses. For a country hosting more than 250 ethnic groups, variegated cultures and traditions, and manifesting spiritual vivacity through their various religions, to be led by a president who is virtually anti-life and anti-culture can be quite challenging. But President Buhari must find a way in his second term to accommodate a people who have, in spite of themselves, reached out to him and accommodated him. Ex-president Olusegun Obasanjo was marketed as that egregious ideal: gregarious but truculent, sociable but almost hedonistic, artistically inclined if his bucolic tendency had not undermined his gifts, and irredeemably boisterous but unable to apply his energies to lofty and noble goals. President Buhari is the complete antithesis.

    The next four years must witness a social revolution that would usher in the arts/culture, music, sports — the renaissance in short. But how so ungifted a man can reach for the stars without committing self-immolation remains to be seen. He does not drink, and he cannot now begin to be a connoisseur of wine. There is no record that he reads one book a week, and he is unlikely to be tempted by what he would consider a drudgery. He has had more than one wife, but unlike Napoleon Bonaparte and Suleyman the Magnificent, there is no record indicating he ever composed any poem or panegyric to womanhood, if not to their beauty, then at least to their entrancing shape. But if he cannot rise above himself, can he not get someone with whom he could entrust that aesthetic assignment?

     

    Foreign policy

    The Buhari government probably sees foreign policy as a luxury. Having failed to master domestic policies, President Buhari may be quite reluctant to dabble in a sector he warily views as stuffy, artificial and complex. As far as his government is concerned, few can fail to notice that foreign policy is all but dead. Of course Nigeria still posts and receives diplomats, and the president makes trips abroad, as frequently as his health can allow. But it is doubtful whether he or anyone else knows what the rubric of his foreign policy is. No one knows beyond the trite restatement of previous paradigms popularised during the activist months of the Murtala Mohammed military government. Africa is still the centre of Nigeria’s foreign policy, and West Africa, particularly ECOWAS, is at the core of the policy concentric circle. But like a distant star, Nigeria muddles on over climate issues, attends international conferences, and routinely speaks at the UN General Assembly. Beyond these, it is a yawning vacuum and a painful blank.

    Would Nigeria want to promote a new world economic system? Of course not. It appears satisfied remaining a financial and trade appendage of China. What of a new power relations, such as the Concert of Medium Powers once promoted by former External Affairs minister, Bolaji Akinyemi? Is it not even more needed now in view of the weakening of the Non-Aligned Movement, and the rise of China and the attendant stress and conflicts rearing their heads as a consequence of the changing balance of power equations? Nigeria has not given a thought to these issues, let alone find and associate with countries with similar orientations. Nigeria used to be very active in the Organisation of African Unity (OAU), now African Union (AU), and took ECOWAS ideology very seriously. But as it surrenders grounds to more focused countries like Ghana and Rwanda, it has found it difficult to respect or inspire respect for ECOWAS rules and regulations, and cannot offer itself as a regional role model in the observance of the rule of law, international trade, human rights, and defence policies and military campaigns. The decline is almost complete and stifling.

    President Buhari may not know much about anything, but he can find the right people to conceptualise a great and inspiring framework for an effective and coherent foreign policy for his government. However, for the right people to join his government and be effective in their assignments, especially those who know their worth, they will have to be confident that the president is not overruled by a cabal, and his ministers have equal access to him, with none of them finding himself humiliated by favoured officials from select tribes or groups.

     

    Conclusion

    Both Chief Obasanjo and ex-president Goodluck Jonathan had the opportunity to lay a great politico-economic foundation for Nigeria at the beginning of the Fourth Republic and thereafter. They did not, though they appeared more equipped, in terms of exposure and education, than President Buhari. However, if the president has learnt anything from his first term, much of it spent either managing internal conflicts within his government and his party or alienating his friends and admirers, he must by now have understood that despite some bright sparks, his government in fact underperformed. But only he can tell whether he will change in his second term, far beyond his verbal promise to make a difference. He still doesn’t have quite the temperament or the time to fulfil the enthusiastic promises he has made for his second term, but it would be hasty to count him out. Indeed, knowing that they are probably stuck with him for the next four years, all Nigerians can hope for is that their president would disappoint those who have concluded that he could not pass muster.

  • Agenda for all-round national development

    The crisis of Nigeria underdevelopment as we have highlighted above can only confronted and resolved with a bold agenda and plan aimed at changing the present economy structure of dependence, it must be revolutionary massive and contain the following elements:

    i). It must aim within 10 to 15 years to expand the GDP by seven fold in order to be able to provide the needed resources to end poverty and underdevelopment on a sustainable basis.

    ii).  The New Nigeria Economic Development Plan must aim to encourage Domestic Capital Formation as a source of financing development rather than dependent on revenue from primary products such as oil and solid minerals. Giving present structure of international trade, the more developing countries export primary products, the less value they get. The revenue from exports proceed is usually so little that sometimes, they compete with revenue of just one corporation from advanced countries of Europe and America. Sample for all the fuse about the high oil receipts in 2013 in Nigeria, about US$50 billion, it compares only with the revenue of Disney world, which was US$47billion. Even if no cent was stolen from the oil receipts it will still be inadequate to finance any meaningful development that a country of 180million population requires.

    iii).       The New Nigeria Economic Development Plan must prioritize investment both from public and private investment in foundation industries that will imbue the Economic with the technical capacity for industrialization and manufacturing. These include immediate priority investment through joint venture financing in iron and steel, machine tools, chemicals, aluminum, glass, plastics and petrochemicals. These industries will help accelerate the process of ‘Domestic Capital Formation’ as they are industries directly connected with the production of Capital goods.

    iv).       The New Nigeria Economic Plan must sustain Nigeria as an open economy that encourages private entrepreneurship for both foreign and local investments side by side with State investments in projects linked to the production of capital goods and infrastructure.

    In order to sustain these essential features of Nigeria economy as an open society, the current relapse to the regime of impunity must be rolled back to the more positive administrative practice that respects the sanctity of contacts, a practice which encouraged Private Sector investment in the economy at the dawn of democracy in 1999 and the succeeding fifteen years after. This is important because, whereas business can handle corruption, business can not cohabit with impunity. Impunity and political blackmail of business hurts economy more than corruption.

    iv).       The New Nigeria Economic Plan must promote innovation, secured Property and copyright in order to make burgeoning ICT sector witness rapid expansion. Protection of copyright will also promote increase scientific research and its commercialization; it will spur innovation in science and arts.

    v).        Agriculture must be linked to Manufacturing and Industry. Currently, over 70% of employed hands in Nigeria are engaged in one form of agriculture or the other compared to about 2% of American. But the total productivity of these 70% engaged hands in Nigeria’s agricultural sector is less than that of 2% of Americans.

    It must therefore be a central objective of the New Nigeria Agricultural policy not only to increase productivity through State support such as provision of extension services to small holders, finance at low interest rate on individual and cooperative basis; but also to link agricultural sector directly to industry and manufacturing in specifically designated zones and Economic clusters, where Agriculture is integrated with industry. Increase agricultural productivity will have meaning within the economy and that agriculture will cease to be a business just to produce for the stomach but to produce vital raw materials for industries and the manufacturing sector; the most effective way to create employment

    vii)       The New Nigeria Economic Plan must seek to transform the Nigeria Economy to a manufacturing Economy from agrarian economy and change it from an economy that is based on production of primary products. Currently, according to FBS record, manufacturing accounts for 9.43% of Nigeria GDP while it provides as low as 0.3% of employment. Transferring the economy to a manufacturing will entail a number of policy incentives, such as creating a fiscal environment and collaborative monetary policy that will allow promoters of manufacturing concerns to accessing finance at single digit rate, ensuring available power to reduce manufacturers’ energy costs. Ultimately, Nigeria needs to grow the manufacturing sector in such a way that it will account for 30-40% of her GDP and be a major employer of labour. China is already an example of how an agrarian economy can be transformed into a manufacturing economy. As at 2015, manufacturing accounts for 40% of GDP of China. As at 2005, the manufacturing sector was also responsible for 11% of total employment. In India, the Industrial Sector accounts for robust 25% of GDI.

    Full employment as a policy of achieving growth and development.

    As earlier observed, unemployment is at an all time high in Nigeria, at national level, stood at 18.6%, this is a recipe for an unending chaos. Full employment through value creating jobs is not just a social policy to help the needy but an economic policy to continuously sustain economic growth for a strong population with disposable income, is a key driver to attract investment into new ventures, industries and infrastructures. Economists such as Lord Maynard Keynes, who was the Chancellor of the Exchequer in England understood clearly the role of creating employment in bailing out a depressed economy in other to stimulate growth. It must be a policy of the New Nigeria Economy to stimulate employment in Agro-Allied industry, ICT, Manufacturing, infrastructure, solid minerals extraction, not just for exports but linked to the needs of local industries.

    Pestructuring public finance, and the financial sector for a growth led strategy.

    In order to direct available finance in the country for key task of industrialization; the country must prioritize available finance for modernizing the country’s infrastructure.

    The trend in which 80% of revenue in the nation’s budget has been disproportionately consistently applied to recurrent expenditure; whilst capital expenditure takes the back seat at 20% must be discounted

    To begin with, it must be the goal of public finance to allocate 50% of revenue to capital expenditure.

    Secondly, there must be a complete change in the budgeting system from the current envelope system where annual budget are merely a repeat of previous year sectorial allocation with variations, accounting for inflation. Budgeting must become NEEDS-BASED, driven by national economic priority, based on a new plan to build modern infrastructure, make the needed social investment for the country and industrialize Nigeria.

    Thirdly, another element of financial reform that Nigeria needs to undertake is to ensure banking and financial sectors make capital available to the real sector of the economy. Whereas, monetary policy formulation is within the competence of the Central Bank which has autonomy over this matters, the necessary coordination between the fiscal and monetary Authorities must be generated to allow the new reform, which must also include bringing down the present unsustainable lending rate to a single digit. At 17.5% – 25% lending rate in the Nigeria financial market, no meaningful industrialization can take place as industrialists and manufacturers from other countries take money for business for as low as 4%. In Malaysia, prevailing lending rate is 4.9%; China is 4.35%; India is 9.45%; South Africa is 10%. Nigeria must move within the single digit band.

    Removing bottlenecks to promote investments in the economy

    As previously observed, the high interest rate of return that investment posts in Nigeria plus the size of the market should naturally recommend the country as a perfect investment destination. But the ability to attract massive private sector investments both from Nigerian and foreign investors has been limited by unnecessary hurdles investors face in trying to obtain permits, licenses, approvals etc. Paper works in Nigeria take more time than even the time developer spend in building infrastructure that the nation desperately needs, whilst it was the good intention of the drafters of the constitution and various legislations to provide autonomy to many regulatory agencies to protect them from unnecessary interventions, the autonomy granted have in most cases been turned to protection for administrative incompetence, which has continuously impeded the ability of the country to net needed investments. These particular problems have acquired international notoriety. Whilst some progress has been made through the initiative of the office of the Vice President of Nigeria between 2016 – 2017, the progress made in the ease of doing business needs to be more rapid. At the moment in Nigeria was ranked 145th out  of 190 countries in the World Bank ease of doing business report in 2018.

    The time has come to dismantle the bottlenecks through a coordinated reform prowess that will be collaborative between both the executive and the legislative. The desired change in the regulatory system of the various sectors of the economy must reduce waiting time on licensing and permits to 90 days and not 2-3 years, as is current practice. It must also make regulatory agencies accountable in the performance of their duties as autonomy now means literally, lack of accountability.

    Prioritizing investment in electricity generation, distribution and transmission.

    Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen; Building an industrialized and modern economy will be impossible without simultaneously directing national energy to rapidly increasing electricity generation, distribution and transmission. The current national electricity generation capacity of about 6,000megawatts is too little a capacity for any meaningful development compared to South African’s generation capacity of more than 40,000megawatts capacity. Nigeria need to aim for over 160,000MW capacity within Ten (10) years to be at per with South Africa per capital generation, and also eliminate current inefficiency in electricity distribution and establish a fair and consumer friendly electricity tariff that will as well be cost recoverable to attract an estimated 200billion Dollar investments from both private and public sectors for the next Ten (10) years.

    As enumerated earlier in our paper on “Facilitating Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructural Development”, there must be “Administrative and Regulated” reforms to eliminate bureaucratic bottlenecks in the power sector, quickly to make the needed investment to flow into the sector.

    Making social investments the soul of our development agenda

    Nigeria as a country has been pulling apart because of rising incidence of poverty, squalor and unemployment. Inequality and the attendant misery have been rising, occasioning massive social instability and insecurity.

    An agenda for development cannot just concern itself with expanding GDP and raising infrastructure expenditures alone. But must focus on pin-point targeted expenditure on health, education, the youth population and investment in social services.

    The reason why Nigeria is experiencing massive social upheavals is not just because it has low income per capital but due also to the fact that available income is not being applied averagely for the welfare of all. Various African countries with half Nigeria’s income per capital post better development indicators.

    As we have observed elsewhere, “The social problems are not going to abate except Nigeria invests immediately in the welfare of the people. According to a recent study by the African Development Information Centre, by 2030, Nigeria’s population will grow to about 210 million; 70 million of this forecast population will be living in North- Eastern Nigeria where there is currently an extremist insurgency; 35 million of which will be under the age of fifteen and would not have received any form of formal education. This is alarming!

    We must invest now to bridge the social divide by making primary and secondary education completely free of all cost with feeding and welfare support at primary school levels. This must be a federally financed program worked out with local authorities for effective implementation. Free education must be entirely free indeed without hidden cost such as examination fees and cost of uniforms.

    The quality of educational and health institutions must be upgraded through the recruitment of qualified professionals, training and retraining of existing hands making available needed equipment and infrastructure and improving productivity and output through a scientific audit system that ties reward and emoluments to performance.

     

    Nigeria must quickly introduce a comprehensive program of accessible, cost-free and qualitative health service coverage for all Nigerians. Nigeria can afford these programs right now as we are already spending billions of dollars managing the social upheavals that are caused by decades of ignoring the welfare of the people especially the young and the vulnerable”.

    CONCLUSION

    Ladies and Gentlemen, the task before patriotic Nigeria who have assigned to themselves the role to see a new, modern, economical developed Nigeria with a prosperous population living in peace and security is daunting but achievable!

    This great nation Nigeria has seen many national challenges in the past resolved by the determination of her people. Our forbears overcome colonial rule by the share power of their determination, organisation and faith in the future. Our generation paid the price to rescue the established Nigerian Democracy after independence from the jaw of military autocracy. The task at hand is to ensure a prosperous democratic Nigeria for all, where the country resources and talents will be applied for all, regardless of ethnicity and religion.

    We can build that new Nigeria together. On my part, you can COUNT ON ME.

     

    Concluded

     

    .Being the text of a lecture delivered by Olawepo-Hashim at the College of Postgraduate studies Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife

  • Agenda for all round national development

    Nigeria to all intents and purposes still remains a country classified as “Underdeveloped” making the question of an “Agenda for all round National Development” topical and germain.

    With 62% of the population living below 2USD a day, and considered poor, with life expectancy of 51 years, and over 40% illiterate population, bedevilled with a parlous infrastructure such as poor electricity distribution, poor road networks, and dilapidated health infrastructure, the underdevelopment profile was in bad relief.

    Though by the sheer nature of superiority of democracy over autocracy, Nigeria made some little gains between 1999-2015. Such gains where almost completely wiped off by 2015 July-2016 when the nation’s economy started contracting leading to her worst economic recession in 25 years -2.4%.

    Just for the records, some of the remarkable gains between 1999-2015, were average life expectancy in Nigeria was increased from 46years as at 1990 to 51 years, telephone use increased from 400,000 to 100,000,000 million lines, the economy posted an average annual growth rate of 6% consistently for 15 years leading to the expansion of the GDP to 510 billion USD in 2013. The Nigerian economy thus became the largest economy in Africa over taking the economy of South Africa. However the above gains especially in the economy fronts was so little to match the rate of poverty and underdevelopment of the country, fragile  and unsustainable. In 2016 the bubble busted and the economy moved to a negative growth only to be reflated by massive external borrowings. The massive loans taken could only achieve a sluggish growth of 1.5% compared to a huge external debt which quickly grew to about 18 billion dollars in 2 years from a low figure of below 2 billion USD as at May 2015.

    We are still waiting for outcome of various studies to show us the impact of what has so far happened to the Nigerian economy and society, since the economic recession of 2016. Current data from the Federal Bureau of statistics are horrifying and the indicators horrendous. FBS statistics reveals that unemployment picked from 6.3% in 2015 to 18.6% by 2017 an increase of 300%. Worst still among the youths, it is a record high of 36% little wonder why there is so much upheavals in the land. Therefore a platform to interrogate the Agenda for all round development of Nigeria, to fashion out a sustainable strategy for growth and development so that the country can live in peace, stability and prosperity cannot be more relevant than now.

    Once again, great Ife has proved truly great for creating the platform for this important discuss.

    What is Development?

    Development has been defined in multifarious ways by scholars of different shades. In the 70s a tribe of scholars of African Sociology and Economics led by the Guyanist scholar of Africa descent Walter Rodney were pre-occupied with this subject matter; they were known as Development and Underdevelopment theorists.

    Walter Rodney in his seminar work “How Europe Underdeveloped Africa” examined development at the individual level as “increased skills and capacity, greater freedom, creativity, self-discipline, responsibility and material wellbeing”.

    Walter Rodney like his later disciples, Samar Amin, Bade Onimode, Nzogola Ntalaja et al, applied their interrogation of the subject-matter of development beyond the individual to society, and the economy and also adopted models of interpretation of history and characterization of different epochs of development. In the Economic realm, Rodney opines that “A society develops economically as its members increase jointly their capacity for dealing with the environment. This capacity for dealing with the environment is dependent on the extent to which they understand the laws of nature (science) and the extent and manner in which work is organised”.

    We must however inform that apart from the development theories other Schools of thoughts such as modernist school, also at one point or the other examined these same concept of development and constructed their own modules.

    For the purpose of this lecture, we shall stick to a safe zone by looking out for what is now universally acceptable for measuring development.  – The tables of indices developed by the United Nations Development Project (UNDP) as indicators to measure development, this is the human development index.

    Apart from economic growth the United Nations developed a number of indices through which development can be measured from country to country. According to the UNDP the human development index (HDI) was created to emphasize that people and their capacities should be the ultimate source of accessing the development of a country not just economic growth.

    The HDI indices therefore includes GNI per capital, health (Life expectancy), Knowledge, (Education, School enrolment etc.).

    How does Nigerian fare under the Hdi?

    GNI per Capital:

    Nigerian per capital income as at 2016 was 5,438.9 USD 1/3 of the worlds average per capital income. In comparative terms to Asian countries and other middle-income nations who were perhaps at the same level of development with Nigerian at independence in 1960. Nigerian per capital income is disappointing. Here are a few example. Thailand 17,786 USD Chile 24,584 USD, Turkey 26,453 USD, Iran 20,030 USD and Mauritius 21,628 USD. Any reasonable development plan for Nigerian must therefore hope to increase GNI per capital by 7 folds within the next 10-15years in other to achieve a level considered at per with middle income countries.

    Health and life expectancy

    Though we have earlier observed some important improvements in life expectancy in Nigeria from 46.1 years in 1990 – 53.1 years in 2015, the country’s life expectancy record is still depressing compared to Liberia 61 years, Niger 61.8 years, Sudan 64.1 years, and Rwanda 66.1 years and far apart from Cuba’s 79.1 years, Norway’s 81 years and 79.2 years in United States. All these countries have gone through sustained civil wars, some pogroms, some civil wars combined with outbreak of epidermis, but still have better life expectancy figure compared to Nigeria.

    Education

    While Nigerians in diaspora remains the most educated set of immigrants in percentage terms compared to their various host communities, at home illiteracy level is still as high as 46%.

    HDI Ranking

    Based on all indices measured in 2016, Nigerian ranked 152 of 188 countries measured in UNDP 2016 Human Development Index (HDI). It fell below Kenya and some other African countries in the West African Sub-Region.

    The data from Federal Bureau of Statistics have been equally as damning on the performance indicators on sustainable development goals in Nigeria just as the UNDP HDI report. As they “say figures do not lie”.

    In the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG’S) baseline report 2016 Published by the Federal Bureau of Statistics (FBS) most of the indicators are woeful, particularly as it affects the young and the youths. Current data indicate that Nigeria has never so ignored her young people as much as it’s currently doing.

    Let us review some few data here: 36% of Nigerian youths are currently unemployed. 20% of youths are currently not in any employment, education or training. They are completely hopeless. For children too, even though not so much is done for them through public policy or family; the adult in the world extract so much from them in terms of forced labour. The FBS study indicates that 47.1% percent of children between ages 5 – 17 are engaged in some form of unpaid labour or the other. It is tragic that our country has become less caring and more vicious in the abuse of her younger population.

    We can change the Nigerian story.

    Distinguished Guest, Ladies and Gentlemen despite the above negative indicators in human Development Index I remain optimistic about Nigerian development trajectory when we tap and build on the energy, creativity, imagination and the industry of everyday Nigerian which is the most important asset that Nigeria possess beyond her Oil wealth and Natural resources.

    As we pointed out at Imperial college London in November 2016 “It is due to the hard work and industry of the ordinary Nigerians the nation’s greatest asset that Nigeria attained a GDP rebased of 510 billion USD in 2013 exceeding that of South Africa to become the biggest African Economy even in  the face of her Parlous infrastructure. The fit was a result of the toiling of small scale entrepreneurs who continue to create value without adequate electricity, cottage food processor, without affordable financing, farmers with the scantest of state support artisans, bold and imaginative business men and women, dynamic financial managers, young innovators, creative artist, “hardworking professionals and intellectuals”.

    Credible international consulting groups such as Price Water Cooper share in our optimism. According to Price Water and Cooper Nigerian economy will grow to be the 9th largest economy in the world in 2050 based on very dynamic key drivers of the economy that has to do with the strength of Nigerians people, the size of her market and less with excellence in governance. Below are some of the key drivers that offers possibilities for rapid investment and growth of Nigeria.

    1. Nigeria has a robust middle class which according to Standard bank reportedly grew 6 folds between 2000-2010
    2. Nigeria has a large market of potential consumers of modern goods and services. This consumers have an attractive profile for investors and manufacturers they already have acquired the discipline to pay for consumption through savings and earnings and have low household debt.

    III.         The infrastructure deficit of the country is both a challenge as well as an opportunity for investment. Out there in the global market according to Oxford economist and PricewaterCooper, there is about 4.78 Trillion USD globally to spend within Ten (10) years looking for infrastructure market to domicile. Nigeria’s hunger for infrastructure investment and with a high record of IRR (above 18%) makes it a natural destination for massive investment if simple bureaucratic hurdles that have continuously impeded investments can be dismantled.

    To be added to the above strength of the Nigerian nation is the nation’s resourceful diaspora community these community of scientist, intelligentsia, innovators, professionals, footballers and Entrepreneurs are adding golden pages to the Nigeria rising story. In 2013 foreign remittances picked as much as 21 billion dollars to Nigeria, mostly coming from the Nigeria diaspora. The diaspora community will continue to form a major pillar in the architecture of Nigerian Socio-economic development. Even in the face of many other negative stories all over the world educated Nigerians are doing well and making the nation proud. The Imafidon twins Paula and Peter broke the world record in mathematics by passing the Cambridge exams at age 8, being the youngest ever to do so. Dr Victor Olalusi who scored 5.0 GPA in the faculty of clinical sciences at the Russian national medical university in 2013 is arguably the first in the world to do so. There are numbers of Americans of Nigerian decent such as Emeka Echeruo founder of hopstop.com purchased by apple at a price of 1 billion USD, who are doing the nation proud in the ICT world. Young Nigerians at home and abroad are proving their exceptional brilliance; 24years old Oluwatobi Olasukanmi won the Williams Charleny prize for the best first class law at the University of Cambridge. Nigerian youths are not just strong and energetic they are bright and brilliant and they compete well anywhere in the world.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The crisis of Nigeria underdevelopment as we have highlighted above can only confronted and resolved with a bold agenda and plan aimed at changing the present economy structure of dependence, it must be revolutionary massive and contain the following elements:

    i).           It must aim within 10 to 15 years to expand the GDP by seven fold in order to be able to provide the needed resources to end poverty and underdevelopment on a sustainable basis.

    ii).         The New Nigeria Economic Development Plan must aim to encourage Domestic Capital Formation as a source of financing development rather than dependent on revenue from primary products such as oil and solid minerals. Giving present structure of international trade, the more developing countries export primary products, the less value they get. The revenue from exports proceed is usually so little that sometimes, they compete with revenue of just one corporation from advanced countries of Europe and America. Sample for all the fuse about the high oil receipts in 2013 in Nigeria, about US$50 billion, it compares only with the revenue of Disney world, which was US$47billion. Even if no cent was stolen from the oil receipts it will still be inadequate to finance any meaningful development that a country of 180million population requires.

    iii).        The New Nigeria Economic Development Plan must prioritize investment both from public and private investment in foundation industries that will imbue the Economic with the technical capacity for industrialization and manufacturing. These include immediate priority investment through joint venture financing in iron and steel, machine tools, chemicals, aluminum, glass, plastics and petrochemicals. These industries will help accelerate the process of ‘Domestic Capital Formation’ as they are industries directly connected with the production of Capital goods.

    iv).        The New Nigeria Economic Plan must sustain Nigeria as an open economy that encourages private entrepreneurship for both foreign and local investments side by side with State investments in projects linked to the production of capital goods and infrastructure.

    In order to sustain these essential features of Nigeria economy as an open society, the current relapse to the regime of impunity must be rolled back to the more positive administrative practice that respects the sanctity of contacts, a practice which encouraged Private Sector investment in the economy at the dawn of democracy in 1999 and the succeeding fifteen years after. This is important because, whereas business can handle corruption, business can not cohabit with impunity. Impunity and political blackmail of business hurts economy more than corruption.

    iv).        The New Nigeria Economic Plan must promote innovation, secured Property and copyright in order to make burgeoning ICT sector witness rapid expansion. Protection of copyright will also promote increase scientific research and its commercialization; it will spur innovation in science and arts.

    v).         Agriculture must be linked to Manufacturing and Industry. Currently, over 70% of employed hands in Nigeria are engaged in one form of agriculture or the other compared to about 2% of American. But the total productivity of these 70% engaged hands in Nigeria’s agricultural sector is less than that of 2% of Americans.

    It must therefore be a central objective of the New Nigeria Agricultural policy not only to increase productivity through State support such as provision of extension services to small holders, finance at low interest rate on individual and cooperative basis; but also to link agricultural sector directly to industry and manufacturing in specifically designated zones and Economic clusters, where Agriculture is integrated with industry. Increase agricultural productivity will have meaning within the economy and that agriculture will cease to be a business just to produce for the stomach but to produce vital raw materials for industries and the manufacturing sector; the most effective way to create employment

    vii)       The New Nigeria Economic Plan must seek to transform the Nigeria Economy to a manufacturing Economy from agrarian economy and change it from an economy that is based on production of primary products. Currently, according to FBS record, manufacturing accounts for 9.43% of Nigeria GDP while it provides as low as 0.3% of employment. Transferring the economy to a manufacturing will entail a number of policy incentives, such as creating a fiscal environment and collaborative monetary policy that will allow promoters of manufacturing concerns to accessing finance at single digit rate, ensuring available power to reduce manufacturers’ energy costs. Ultimately, Nigeria needs to grow the manufacturing sector in such a way that it will account for 30-40% of her GDP and be a major employer of labour. China is already an example of how an agrarian economy can be transformed into a manufacturing economy. As at 2015, manufacturing accounts for 40% of GDP of China. As at 2005, the manufacturing sector was also responsible for 11% of total employment. In India, the Industrial Sector accounts for robust 25% of GDI.

    FULL EMPLOYMENT AS A POLICY OF ACHIEVING GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.

    As earlier observed, unemployment is at an all time high in Nigeria, at national level, stood at 18.6%, this is a recipe for an unending chaos. Full employment through value creating jobs is not just a social policy to help the needy but an economic policy to continuously sustain economic growth for a strong population with disposable income, is a key driver to attract investment into new ventures, industries and infrastructures. Economists such as Lord Maynard Keynes, who was the Chancellor of the Exchequer in England understood clearly the role of creating employment in bailing out a depressed economy in other to stimulate growth. It must be a policy of the New Nigeria Economy to stimulate employment in Agro-Allied industry, ICT, Manufacturing, infrastructure, solid minerals extraction, not just for exports but linked to the needs of local industries.

    RESTRUCTURING PUBLIC FINANCE, AND THE FINANCIAL SECTOR FOR A GROWTH LED STRATEGY.

    In order to direct available finance in the country for key task of industrialization; the country must prioritize available finance for modernizing the country’s infrastructure.

    The trend in which 80% of revenue in the nation’s budget has been disproportionately consistently applied to recurrent expenditure; whilst capital expenditure takes the back seat at 20% must be discounted

    To begin with, it must be the goal of public finance to allocate 50% of revenue to capital expenditure.

    Secondly, there must be a complete change in the budgeting system from the current envelope system where annual budget are merely a repeat of previous year sectorial allocation with variations, accounting for inflation. Budgeting must become NEEDS-BASED, driven by national economic priority, based on a new plan to build modern infrastructure, make the needed social investment for the country and industrialize Nigeria.

    Thirdly, another element of financial reform that Nigeria needs to undertake is to ensure banking and financial sectors make capital available to the real sector of the economy. Whereas, monetary policy formulation is within the competence of the Central Bank which has autonomy over this matters, the necessary coordination between the fiscal and monetary Authorities must be generated to allow the new reform, which must also include bringing down the present unsustainable lending rate to a single digit. At 17.5% – 25% lending rate in the Nigeria financial market, no meaningful industrialization can take place as industrialists and manufacturers from other countries take money for business for as low as 4%. In Malaysia, prevailing lending rate is 4.9%; China is 4.35%; India is 9.45%; South Africa is 10%. Nigeria must move within the single digit band.

    REMOVING BOTTLENECKS TO PROMOTE INVESTMENTS IN THE ECONOMY

    As previously observed, the high interest rate of return that investment posts in Nigeria plus the size of the market should naturally recommend the country as a perfect investment destination. But the ability to attract massive private sector investments both from Nigerian and foreign investors has been limited by unnecessary hurdles investors face in trying to obtain permits, licenses, approvals etc. Paper works in Nigeria take more time than even the time developer spend in building infrastructure that the nation desperately needs, whilst it was the good intention of the drafters of the constitution and various legislations to provide autonomy to many regulatory agencies to protect them from unnecessary interventions, the autonomy granted have in most cases been turned to protection for administrative incompetence, which has continuously impeded the ability of the country to net needed investments. These particular problems have acquired international notoriety. Whilst some progress has been made through the initiative of the office of the Vice President of Nigeria between 2016 – 2017, the progress made in the ease of doing business needs to be more rapid. At the moment in Nigeria was ranked 145th out  of 190 countries in the World Bank ease of doing business report in 2018.

    The time has come to dismantle the bottlenecks through a coordinated reform prowess that will be collaborative between both the executive and the legislative. The desired change in the regulatory system of the various sectors of the economy must reduce waiting time on licensing and permits to 90 days and not 2-3 years, as is current practice. It must also make regulatory agencies accountable in the performance of their duties as autonomy now means literally, lack of accountability.

    PRIORITIZING INVESTMENT IN ELECTRICITY GENERATION, DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION.

    Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen; Building an industrialized and modern economy will be impossible without simultaneously directing national energy to rapidly increasing electricity generation, distribution and transmission. The current national electricity generation capacity of about 6,000megawatts is too little a capacity for any meaningful development compared to South African’s generation capacity of more than 40,000megawatts capacity. Nigeria need to aim for over 160,000MW capacity within Ten (10) years to be at per with South Africa per capital generation, and also eliminate current inefficiency in electricity distribution and establish a fair and consumer friendly electricity tariff that will as well be cost recoverable to attract an estimated 200billion Dollar investments from both private and public sectors for the next Ten (10) years.

    As enumerated earlier in our paper on “Facilitating Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructural Development”, there must be “Administrative and Regulated” reforms to eliminate bureaucratic bottlenecks in the power sector, quickly to make the needed investment to flow into the sector.

    MAKING SOCIAL INVESTMENTS THE SOUL OF OUR DEVELOPMENT AGENDA

    Nigeria as a country has been pulling apart because of rising incidence of poverty, squalor and unemployment. Inequality and the attendant misery have been rising, occasioning massive social instability and insecurity.

    An agenda for development cannot just concern itself with expanding GDP and raising infrastructure expenditures alone. But must focus on pin-point targeted expenditure on health, education, the youth population and investment in social services.

    The reason why Nigeria is experiencing massive social upheavals is not just because it has low income per capital but due also to the fact that available income is not being applied averagely for the welfare of all. Various African countries with half Nigeria’s income per capital post better development indicators.

    As we have observed elsewhere, “The social problems are not going to abate except Nigeria invests immediately in the welfare of the people. According to a recent study by the African Development Information Centre, by 2030, Nigeria’s population will grow to about 210 million; 70 million of this forecast population will be living in North- Eastern Nigeria where there is currently an extremist insurgency; 35 million of which will be under the age of fifteen and would not have received any form of formal education. This is alarming!

    We must invest now to bridge the social divide by making primary and secondary education completely free of all cost with feeding and welfare support at primary school levels. This must be a federally financed program worked out with local authorities for effective implementation. Free education must be entirely free indeed without hidden cost such as examination fees and cost of uniforms.

    The quality of educational and health institutions must be upgraded through the recruitment of qualified professionals, training and retraining of existing hands making available needed equipment and infrastructure and improving productivity and output through a scientific audit system that ties reward and emoluments to performance.

    Nigeria must quickly introduce a comprehensive program of accessible, cost-free and qualitative health service coverage for all Nigerians. Nigeria can afford these programs right now as we are already spending billions of dollars managing the social upheavals that are caused by decades of ignoring the welfare of the people especially the young and the vulnerable”.

    CONCLUSION

    Ladies and Gentlemen, the task before patriotic Nigeria who have assigned to themselves the role to see a new, modern, economical developed Nigeria with a prosperous population living in peace and security is daunting but achievable!

    This great nation Nigeria has seen many national challenges in the past resolved by the determination of her people. Our forbears overcome colonial rule by the share power of their determination, organisation and faith in the future. Our generation paid the price to rescue the established Nigerian Democracy after independence from the jaw of military autocracy. The task at hand is to ensure a prosperous democratic Nigeria for all, where the country resources and talents will be applied for all, regardless of ethnicity and religion.

    We can build that new Nigeria together. On my part, you can COUNT ON ME.

    God bless GREAT IFE!

    GOD BLESS NIGERIA!!.

    Thank You.

     

     

  • Edo sets agenda for special assistants

    Edo State government has urged special assistants on gender to strengthen structures in their communities to facilitate change in the socio-economic condition of women.

    Commissioner for Women Affairs and Social Development Mrs. Magdalene Ohenhen, who spoke at the weekend at a one-day orientation organised for special assistants in Benin, told them that they should champion gender issues and monitor mainstreaming of women in development initiatives.

    She said the orientation was organised to prepare aides for the tasks ahead.

    Ohenhen said Governor Godwin Obaseki expected them to organise women to benefit from social empowerment policies.

    She said: “The need for women to be in the vanguard of gender-sensitive initiatives is imperative, because many are vulnerable to vagaries of life.

    “If women are better organised to participate in governance, gender issues confronting them will be tackled by the government.

    “When women are socially and economically empowered, the society will be better for it.”

    Ms. Efosa Uyigue, special adviser to the governor on Gender, advised the appointees to collaborate with the local government in identifying gender-based issues confronting women at the grassroots.

    She listed some focus areas as access to health care services and education for women, cleanliness as well as empowerment opportunities for them.

  • Agenda for 2018

    Agenda for 2018

    BY May 2018, President Muhammadu Buhari will be three years in office. He will be left with only one year to go, more than half of which will inevitably be spent actively campaigning or machinating for victory in the 2019 elections. The last two years and more have been spent in controversially fulfilling, in part and desultorily, the All Progressives Congress (APC) manifesto, particularly the economic and security aspects. That period has also been devoted to dutifully cleaning the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Augean stables without the advantage of diverting rivers of intellect and talents to help with the task, and straining to find a balance between the higher ideals of the rule of law and the mesmerising possibilities of the rule of man to which this presidency appears not to be averse.

    Distracted by illness and a few family distresses, the president will in addition have to contend in 2018 with the suffocating demands of politics, regardless of the general unease his ministerial team and kitchen cabinet feel about high-wire politics. Everyone around the president will in the coming months be consumed by the objective of getting the president re-elected, for he and his teams are not only keen on returning to office in 2019, they have shown since 2015 how deeply enamoured of power and its perquisites they are. In the new year, they will have to confront a rejuvenated but still ethically challenged PDP. The opposition party will of course have its own agenda and challenges as it strikes valiantly to convince the electorate that its moral core, such as it claims to possess, was not in any way vitiated by its 2015 electoral loss nor by its dissonant and profligate years in power.

    Nigerians themselves are entitled to nurture an ambition for 2018, whether they possess the rigour and discipline to coherently articulate it or not. More than five decades staying on the receiving end of spendthrift and incompetent leadership, it is clear they have not been able to convolute their simple needs of food, security, medical care and shelter. But just as they have been serially short-changed for decades, they have also been bizarrely indulgent of their leaders’ abominable practices and oppressive policies. They may not always expertly frame their needs, which undoubtedly accounts for the support they give the wrong leadership crowds, but their naivety should in fact ginger the leaders to devise the right policy mix in the clear understanding that the onus for change rests upon their frail shoulders.

    But whether it is the people or the ruling party, or even the opposition, there will be the temptation to conceive and produce an agenda that addresses mainly the physical and superficial needs of the country — bridges, roads, hospitals, schools, etc. — to the detriment of the more abstract and nuanced but infinitely more concrete needs of the people. Roads and bridges are vital and indispensable, but as great leaders know, both by experience and their capacity for abstract thinking, what is seen or felt is the product of what does not appear. Mind, they say, always triumphs over matter. It is indisputable that Nigeria aspires to be a great nation. What is not clear is whether any nation can achieve that desired greatness without first defining itself and forging an identity; for in that definition and identity lies the seed of greatness.

    There is little chance that the current set of Nigerian leaders can be persuaded to first settle the matter of their country’s self-definition. It is too tortuous and too complex for them to summon the discipline and intellect to enunciate. For the people, too, especially a people suffering deprivation and hunger, any such self-definition is nothing but a superfluous and unproductive rigmarole. For the 2019 elections, it is unlikely that both the PDP and the APC will produce a standard-bearer with the depth and competence to predicate a great nation on a rigorous national self-definition. In Africa, the nearest examples were Kwame Nkrumah’s Ghana, Gamel Abdel Nasser’s Egypt, Nelson Mandela’s South Africa, Julius Nyerere’s Tanzania. But even these ended up inchoate. Who today gets an inspiring sense of what Ghana, Egypt and South Africa stand for?

    If Nigeria is capable of self-definition, she must ask herself who she is and what she stands for in a complex and competing world. This in effect is the agenda for 2018. This agenda may be dismissed as idealistic and far-fetched; but without knowing who she is, and as she lets herself be swamped by many definitions, to wit, of the Igbo, of the Yoruba, of the Hausa/Fulani, etc., she will be unable to fit her leadership selection model, economic model and political model on anything concrete. The job of designing a national self-definition is, strictly speaking, not that of the people whose indeterminate thoughts often coalesce around self-gratification. It is the job of leaders, for they are expected to be above the common run, to possess qualities — mental and moral — far above the average, and to have the force of character to find a living space for their people that encapsulates ideology and vision, and projects power.

    If Vladimir Putin is today popular in inverse proportion to the performance of Russia’s economy and Russia’s image in the world, it is because he embodies his country’s essence and self-definition, an essence that has survived inclement and hostile centuries, the rise and fall of the Soviet Union, and the vagaries of war and privations during World War I and World War II. Mr Putin has what historians call an instinctive feel of who Russia is and what and how commodious her place in the world should be. He sees himself as personifying the country in a way that is infinitely glorifying and transcendental. It was not surprising that both St. Joan of Arc and Napoleon Bonaparte described themselves as embodiments of France, and Charles de Gaulle saw himself as a combination and personification of both icons and of France. This was also why the great empires of Greece, Persia, Babylon and Rome appealed to deeper abstractions which their ordinary citizens found difficult to appreciate; and why Britain and the United States of America, inspired by those great empires, also anchored their own national visions and institutions on some of the building blocks of those illustrious empires.

    The eagerness with which Nigeria, for instance, hankers after American help in the battle against Boko Haram is a little embarrassing and is a further reflection of the inability of the country to define and identify itself. France is hunkered down in Niger Republic, and America has drones in that country, drones that fly over Nigeria ostensibly for intelligence sharing about Boko Haram movements. A perceptive leader and country would fear that their sovereignty might gradually be eroded by the presence of such firepower next door and technological deployment in a neighbouring country. Intelligence sharing must have boundaries. If America was prepared to go to war to avert the deployment of missiles in nearby Cuba in the early 1960s, and Russia brushed off international protests to take Crimea and forage for land, influence and buffer in Ukraine for strategic reasons, it is curious that Nigeria has both appeared to be helpless in the face of creeping external influence around and within its borders, and is also willing to invite foreign help, regardless of the future and strategic implications.

    Everything boils down to self-awareness, of who Nigeria is, and what she wants in her immediate region and beyond. Does she have the pride and vision of Russia, America, France, Britain and some other great countries and empires? Does she have the pride and vision which even Nkrumah, Nyerere, Nasser, among others, enunciated and embodied just a few decades ago? If Nigerian leaders cannot explain why France humbled by Germany in World War II found its way into the United Nations Security Council, and cannot explain Russia’s fascination with Mr Putin, nor understand America’s retention of military bases in many parts of the world, then it is impossible for them to establish and understand the dynamics of the link between their country’s identity and their ambition for greatness. Every other thing, including elections, security, development, social re-engineering, will be imbued with greatness only after that link has been established.

    However, if national self-definition (and a country’s awareness of its role and purpose in the world) is not constantly renewed and nurtured, it will die. It is worse for countries that have never managed to find nor embrace their raison d’etre. Nigeria is a distant concept far removed from its citizens; this is partly why it is at war with itself in all ramifications, why its leaders have no spiritual connection with their country, why its people are detached and alienated, and why the world, confused by the emptiness they see in, and of, Nigeria, struggle to give their own definitions to a country and people they have so much contempt for. This is also partly why Nigeria’s law enforcement and security services have no deeper and spiritual connection with their country beyond employer-employee relations. And this is why the next elections, as other past elections showed, will end in futility, producing rulers and a class of politicians with no real talent.

    The shocking historical fact is that the many nations cobbled together by the British colonialists to form Nigeria had embraced and nurtured far more engaging self-definitions and national meanings and significances than Nigeria itself. A close examination of Oyo Empire, Sokoto Caliphate, Kanem-Bornu, and the many kingdoms that dot the geographical space that is today Nigeria illustrates this point clearly. While the British bear responsibility for distorting the history of Nigeria and its development, their meddlesomeness does not full absolve those who have led Nigeria for the past five decades and more. Many decades after independence, the British could not be held responsible for Nigeria’s persistent inability to produce leaders with the depth of knowledge and vision needed to transform the country into a first-rate society.

    Twice this year this column had drawn attention to how great countries and empires were founded and transformed. It suggested that no Nigerian leader could achieve success without studying the histories and biographies of great nations and great leaders. It is important that they must understand how other leaders transformed their societies, appreciate the various lessons embedded in those transformations, extract examples from them, and with firmness, political savvy and intellectual depth mould Nigeria for the present and the future. No Nigerian leader has so far shown the capacity to learn, let alone, practicalise the requisite lessons. Setting agenda, as some expect, in terms of interest rates, foreign direct investment, composition of INEC, police reforms, military-civil relations, economic diplomacy, raising education budget, agricultural revolution, etc., will not bring about the lasting greatness and fame the country desires.

    This piece is a reminder to Nigerians and their rulers that there are no shortcuts to the greatness they crave. Until the country produces the right leaders, even the application of the so-called right policies stand the risk of miscarrying very badly. Let Nigeria define itself first and forge an identity, particularly within its regional, continental and racial contexts, before conceiving how far and high it needs to, and can, soar. That is the agenda for 2018, an agenda that is nevertheless proving increasingly chimerical. If a man cannot be defined by the clothes he wears nor a woman by her dresses and makeup, why would a country be defined only by what it looks like? If China, Japan, South Korea, Germany, France, U.S., United Kingdom, Russia etc. are not defined by their wealth or their physiognomies, why would Nigeria hope to be defined by its GDP or size? It is time to re-examine and change the country’s existential paradigm in order to put a halt to the aimless wandering of decades past.

     

     

     

     

  • Daniel: PDP chair a Southwest agenda

    Daniel: PDP chair a Southwest agenda

    Former Ogun State Governor Gbenga Daniel has said the  national chairmanship of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has become a Southwest agenda.

    Daniel said the party’s No. 1 one office had morphed into a Southwest agenda, which should be pursued and achieved by the zone.

    The former governor, who ruled Ogun State for eight years on the ticket of the party, said he was vying for the national chairmanship to rescue and reposition the party for success.

    He noted that “PDP national chairmanship has gone beyond individual agenda to become a Southwest agenda”.

    Daniel spoke yesterday in Abeokuta, the capital, while addressing party stakeholders and delegates ahead of the December 9 national convention in Abuja.

    The meeting was attended by PDP State Chairman Sikirulahi Ogundele, Prince Gboyega Nasiru Isiaka, Chief Remi Bakare, Titi Gomez, Mrs. Iyabo Apampa, Senator Lekan Mustapha and others.

    Daniel admitted that while PDP is strong in the Southeast, Southsouth and North, it is weak in the Southwest.

    The former governor urged the party’s Southwest stakeholders to unite and ensure the zone gets the national chairmanship.

    He said: “Our party is very weak in the Southwest. We only have a governor in Ekiti State and we should pray that we retain the state in 2018. In the Southsouth, Southeast and in the North, the PDP has more than one governor. The North, which has two governors, has even zoned the Presidency in 2019 to the region. So, the only thing left for the Southwest is the position of the national chairman.

    “And if we fail to land the position, then we have nothing left for us. Even the All Progressives Congress (APC) has its Vice President in the Southwest as well as other appointees. We must get it right so that we can have something to campaign to our people.”

    Daniel expressed the confidence that if the national chairmanship comes to Ogun State, the effects will manifest throughout the Southwest.

    The former governor urged the state’s delegates to vote wisely during the convention.

    He added: “I know how to win elections. There is only one way to remove an incumbent governor, and that is by a grand coalition of forces. We need GNI, we need Adebutu, we need Lekan Mustapha and everyone to do this.

    “My job, if elected as the national chairman of our great party, is to provide the ground for the grand coalition to win. We need to create space for ourselves. I was in Lagos and I was not happy with the situation of the party. We need to work and reposition the PDP in Lagos.

    “In Osun, people are ready to change the ‘change’. In Oyo, we brought back (former Governor Rashidi) Ladoja and Seyi Makinde to the party. The people are ready there to vote for the PDP again. All we need is a Southwest PDP national chairman of my calibre and experience to organise our people and return the PDP to the path of glory.

    “An election is even interstate: whatever happens in a neighbouring state will surely percolate down to the other state. So, if we win elections in Ekiti and Osun states next year, that will serve as a good omen for our party in 2019 general election.”

  • Stockbrokers’ chiefs set agenda as institute clocks 25

    Past Presidents of the Chartered Institute of Stockbrokers (CIS) have identified continuing capacity building and amenable operating environment as some of the ways to further enhance the practice of stockbroking in Nigeria.

    The Presidents, who spoke against the background of the 25th anniversary of the CIS, noted that though the institute and stockbroking profession have made many great strides, there is need to focus on consolidating the achievements of the past two and half decades.

    The Presidents who pinpointed challenges facing the institute such as crumbling businesses of the members arising from the global market crash of 2008 and 2009, disunity among members and investor apathy to the market over the years, however, commended it for weathering the storm and forging ahead in all its activities.

    By the Act 105 of 1992 that establishes the institute, it has been in existence for 25 years as an organisation that trains and certifies professionals in the Investment and securities market. The Silver Jubilee coincides with the Institute’s Annual Conference with the theme:  Adapting to Dynamic Changes in the Financial Market

    In his review of the activities of the institute in recent time, the President between 2014 and 2016, Alhaji Ariyo Olushekun, made a poignant summary of the challenges and the way forward:

    “My tenure coincided with the period of global economic meltdown. The Nigerian stock market was badly affected and that came with its attendant financial difficulties. Almost all stakeholders had difficulty in meeting their financial obligations to the institute. The institute therefore had to operate with a lean purse,” Olushekun said.

    He noted that the institute had made some achievements during his tenure including forbearance  of debts owed by stockbroking firms to Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria ( AMCON), waiver of Value Added Tax (VAT) and Stamp Duty on stock market transactions, six-year strategic plan for CIS and launching of CIS Building Fund among others.

    “Stockbrokers need to be well equipped to continue to provide excellent service to the investing public with integrity. Regulators need to continue to support and collaborate with CIS to develop the capital market. Investors should ensure that their investment decisions are based on sound fundamental and technical analysis,” Olushekun said.

    Commenting on the institute’s activities, the President from 2010 to 2012, Mr Mike Itegboje, explained that the global  market crash of 2008 put many Stockbroking firms into difficult position .

    “The biggest challenge was how to revive the business of our members after the crash of 2008 and 2009. That was why we pleaded for debt forgiveness. It  has been a tough journey. Now at 25, we can only thank God. The baby has become an adult, having won the battles for survival.  My vision is to see that CIS produces and certifies Secutities and Investment dealers, investment analysts and advisers to meet the national need, “ said Itegboje.

    Corroborating Itegboje, Mr Oladiipo Aina, who was the President of the institute from 2006 to 2008, noted that CIS had gone through series of challenges over the years and the way forward is to raise the bar in all its activities.