Tag: Alleged contempt

  • Alleged contempt: Firm urges court to compel Orjiako’s appearance

    A firm, AOS Orwell Ltd, has urged the Federal High Court in Lagos to compel the appearance of Seplat Petroleum Development Company Plc Chairman, Dr. Ambrosie Bryant Orjiako, for allegedly flouting court orders.

    The firm, through its counsel Mr Kunle Ogunba (SAN) of Insolvency Forte, told Justice Saliu Saidu that Orjiako’s presence was required in the contempt proceedings despite his pending appeal.

    Another judge, Justice Hadiza Shagari, last December 4, issued a bench warrant for Orjiako’s arrest based on an application by AOS Orwell.

    The court restrained Shebah Exploration and Production Company Limited (the respondent) or its agents from dealing or tampering with its assets, funds, shares and equipment within and outside Nigeria.

    AOS Orwell said despite the service of the orders on the company, Orjiako “proceeded to deal with, dissipate and/or alienate the shares/assets of the respondent contrary to the orders.”

    The firm said Orjiako “is the Managing Director, Chairman/alter ego and the Chief Executive Officer of Shebah Exploration and Production”.

    The firm, which initiated contempt proceedings against Orjiakor, prayed Justice Shagari for an order committing him to prison for his “willful, deliberate and orchestrated disobedience to the interim orders which metamorphosed into interlocutory orders of this honourable court”.

    The court had on more than one occasion directed Orjiako to appear before it, but the Seplat chairman failed to turn up, following which Justice Hadiza issued a bench warrant for his arrest.

    But, Orjiako filed a notice of appeal, as well as a motion on notice seeking stay of execution of the arrest order.

    AOS Orwell, which filed its brief of argument along with a notice of preliminary objection to the motion for stay, could not execute the bench warrant.

    When the matter was to come up on January 17 for hearing and report of execution of the order, parties were informed that Justice Shagari had been transferred to Kano.

    During hearing last Thursday before Justice Saidu, who took over the case, Ogunba referred to a February 8 Court of Appeal judgment delivered by Justice Mohammed Garba.

    The case (numbered CA/L/907c/2018) is between of First Bank of Nigeria Plc Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer Adesola Adeduntan and the Ejama-Ebubu community in Eleme, Rivers State.

    Adeduntan had appealed his conviction for contempt by Justice Ibrahim Buba after the community accused the bank of refusing to release a judgment sum.

    The Court of Appeal set aside Adeduntan’s conviction and discharged him “on ground that the lower court convicted and committed the appellant to prison for contempt in his absence”.

    Citing the judgment, Ogunba argued that if Justice Saidu goes on to hear the substantive petition without the alleged contemnor being in court, whatsoever the court does would be set aside by the Court of Appeal.

    According to him, the law is that the presence of the alleged contemnor in court is mandatory notwithstanding his appeals.

    He said for the court to take further arguments on the matter, the Orjiako must be present.

    AOS Orwell had obtained the interlocutory orders seeking to stop the respondent’s directors from dissipating its assets pending the hearing and determination of the application for the appointment of a provisional liquidator for Shebah Exploration and Production over an alleged multi-million naira debt.

    The petitioner said despite the orders, Orjiako allegedly sold Shebah Exploration and Production’s shares to Petrolin Trading Limited on January 6 and refused to purge himself of the contempt by reversing the sale.

    In a related case, Justice Muslim Hassan will on March 27 rule on a motion seeking the dismissal of a petition filed by Shebah Exploration and Production Company against African Export-Import Bank, Diamond Bank (now Access Bank) and Skye Bank Plc.

    Shebah Exploration and its Chairman, Orjiako, are praying Justice Hassan to set aside the leave granted to the three banks to register an English judgment against them in Nigeria.

    But, AOS Orwell, to whom Shebah Exploration is allegedly indebted, is praying Justice Hassan to dismiss Shabah Exploration’s petition against the three banks.

    AOS Orwell argued that Shebah Exploration could not file any petition against the banks without first obtaining Justice Saidu’s leave, since he is already hearing the winding-up case aganst Shebah.

    The firm is contending that without obtaining Justice Saidu’s permission, Shebah Exploration could not file any petition against the three banks.

    But Shebah Exploration has urged Justice Hassan to ignore AOS Orwell’s motion on notice.

    In a counter-affidavit by one Martins Nwankwo, Shebah Exploration described AOS Orwell as an interloper, contending that its motion on notice was brought in bad faith.

    It said: “The applicant (AOS Orwell) is not a party to the present suit, which has been filed by the petitioners to set aside the orders of this court granting leave to the respondents to register a foreign judgment obtained in the High Court of England and Wales against the petitioners.

    “The transaction culminating in the suit before the original court was a credit facility and other ancillary agreements between the petitioners and the respondents,to which the applicant is not privy and has no relationship whatsoever.

    “The applicant was also not a party to the suit at the English High Court of England and Wales and therefore has no interest whatsoever in the subject matter of the present suit.

    “I urge this court to dismiss the applicant’s motion dated 22nd October 2018 with substantial cost against the applicant, having truncated the hearing of the originating petition scheduled for the 23rd day of October 2018, necessitating the filing of processes in opposition and having been brought in bad faith.”

    Justice Saidu adjourned until March 25, while Justice Hassan adjourned until March 27 for ruling.

     

  • Saraki authorises payment of Omo-Agege’s entitlements to avoid contempt charge

    SENATE President Bukola Saraki has evaded the trouble of being subjected to trial for contempt as he conceded to the request for the payment of Senator Ovie Omo-Agege’s withheld entitlements.

    The information that Saraki has authorised the payment of Omo-Agege’s entitlements was made public yesterday by his (Omo-Agege’s) lawyer, Alex Izinyon (SAN).

    Izinyon made the disclosure at the resumption of proceedings in the contempt case initiated against Saraki and the Senate by Omo-Agege, before the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    Omo-Agege (representing Delta Central) initiated the contempt proceedings over allegation that Saraki and the Senate refused to obey a portion of the court’s earlier judgment ordering that he (Omo-Agege), who was earlier suspended, be paid his entitlements.

    The Senate had, earlier this year, suspended Omo-Agege. But the court, in a May 10, 2018 judgment, set aside, ordered his reinstatement and the payment of his accrued benefits for the period of the suspension.

    Omo-Agege later returned to the court with a contempt case against Saraki and the Senate. He claimed that while they reinstated him, Saraki and the Senate withheld his entitlements in disobedience to the court’s judgment.

    On the last adjourned date, October 11, Izinyon prayed the court to hear his client’s committal application against Saraki and the Senate, who were absent in court.

    But instead, Justice Nnamdi Dimgba said he would give Saraki another chance to either “remedy the alleged wrong” or appear in court to defend himself. The judge adjourned to October 18.

    Yesterday, when the case was called, Saraki was also absent. But he and the Senate were represented by a lawyer, Efut Okoi.

    Izinyon told the court that his client was paid his entitlements on October 12, barely 24 hours after the court elected to accord Saraki another chance to either right the alleged wrong or attend court to enter defence in the contempt case.

    Izinyon said after the last proceedings, he ensure that Saraki was served with the court order of October 11, along with a letter from his chambers informing him of yesterday’s date.

    He added that the next day, on October 12, a Special Assistant to Saraki informed him that his client has nine cheques waiting for him.

    Izinyon said he received the cheques on behalf of his client and acknowledged receipt.

    He said Omo-Agege acknowledged that there was a shortfall of N6 million when the cheques were handed to him.

    Izinyon said when notified, the Senate President’s aide acknowledged that the Omo-Agege’s claim was correct.

    He added that the Saraki’s aide admitted that the shortfall was from an error in computation. He said the error was promptly rectified and the N6 million paid to his client.

    Izinyon said, with the development, it was unnecessary to proceed with the contempt case.

    He applied to withdraw the contempt case. Okoi did not object to the application.

    Justice Dimgba struck the case out.

  • Alleged contempt: Court orders Seplat Chairman Orjiako’s arrest

    THE Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered the arrest of Chairman of Seplat Petroleum Development Company Plc, Dr. Ambrose Orjiako, for allegedly flouting its orders.

    Justice Hadiza Shagari issued a bench warrant for Orjiako’s arrest based on an application by a firm, AOS Orwell Ltd, through its lawyer Kunle Ogunba (SAN).

    According to the petitioner/applicant, the court made orders restraining the respondent (Shebah Exploration and Production Company Ltd) or its agents from dealing with or tampering with the company’s assets, funds, shares and equipment within and outside Nigeria.

    It said despite the service of the court orders on the company, Orjiako “proceeded to deal with, dissipate and/or alienate the shares/assets of the respondent contrary to the orders.”

    AOS Orwell said Orjiako “is the Managing Director, Chairman/alter ego and the Chief Executive Officer of Shebah Exploration and Production”.

    The firm, which initiated contempt proceedings against Orjiakor, is praying the court for an order committing him to prison for his “willful, deliberate and orchestrated disobedience to the interim orders, which metamorphosed into interlocutory orders of this honourable court”.

    The court had on more than one occasion directed Orjiako to appear before it, but the Seplat chairman failed to turn up.

    Yesterday, Ogunba urged the court to protect its integrity by “sending a strong message” that it cannot be ridiculed by anyone.

    “The contemnor is not in court despite a subsisting order that he should appear. Your Lordship has an obligation at this stage to issue a Bench Warrant for his arrest; otherwise this solemn assembly will become a circus show, because it appears he is making a mockery of the court.

    “I urge my lord to issue a Bench warrant at this time so that we can all protect the sanctity of the judiciary. No application can be moved without the contemnor being in court.

    “It will be a sad day if the contemnor is treated with kid gloves. This is a golden opportunity to send a strong message,” Ogunba said.

    Orjiako’s lawyer Prof. Koyinsola Ajayi (SAN) urged the court to adjourn the case to enable him respond to the petitioner’s counter-affidavit.

    Ajayi drew the court’s attention to a motion on notice seeking to set aside an order made on November 15 directing Orjiako to appear in court.

    In the application, Orjiako said the order was “made in error” on the basis that he was not a party to the suit and that he did not violate the court’s order.

    Ruling on Ogunba’s application, Justice Shagari held that while it is the general rule to determine the issue of jurisdiction first, any challenge of the court’s authority takes priority.

    “The court has to determine the issue of contempt before the main issue. I hereby grant the oral application for a bench warrant to be issued against the alleged contemnor,” the judge ruled.

    AOS Orwell had obtained the interlocutory orders seeking to stop the respondent’s directors from dissipating its assets pending the hearing and determination of the application for the appointment of a provisional liquidator for Shebah Exploration and Production over an alleged multi-million naira debt.

    The petitioner said despite the orders, Orjiako allegedly sold Shebah Exploration and Production’s shares to Petrolin Trading Ltd on January 6 and refused to purge himself of the contempt by reversing the sale.

    Justice Shagari adjourned till December 11.

  • Alleged contempt: Kashamu misled court, say AGF, NDLEA

    Alleged contempt: Kashamu misled court, say AGF, NDLEA

    The Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) yesterday urged the Federal High Court in Lagos to dismiss contempt proceedings initiated against them by Senator Buruji Kashamu, who they are seeking to extradite to the United States to face drug dealing charges.

    Through his lawyer, AJibola Oluyede, Kashamu had filed a Motion on Notice for committal of the AGF and NDLEA Chairman Ahmed Giade to prison.

    The applicant prayed the court to hold that the respondents are in criminal contempt by their alleged willful violation of a court judgment dated January 6.

    He prayed the court to declare that the invasion of his home by NDLEA officials at the instance of the AGF, as well as the extradition proceedings which they commenced, constitute criminal contempt.

    But counsel to the AGF, Chief Emeka Ngige (SAN), told Justice Ibrahim Buba yesterday that Kashamu’s application was an abuse of court process because similar prayers had earlier been moved and decided by another judge of the court, Justice Okon Abang on June 8.

    “In his ruling, Abang granted the same reliefs being sought in the instant application. The same committal proceedings was filed before Abang – word for word – and he has dealt with it finally,” Ngige said, adding that Oluyede hid that fact before Justice Buba.

    NDLEA’s lawyer Mr Joseph Sunday said there was nothing illegal about the agency’s actions to warrant being held in contempt. “There is nothing illegal about the actions of the second respondent,” he said.

    He had earlier argued that Justice Abang never made any order restraining the agency from extraditing Kashamu.

    “Your lordship was misled into thinking there are orders against extradition. What they asked before Abang is order against abduction, kidnap,” he said.

    Besides, he said Justice Abang’s judgment of last year was on a suit by a group, the Concerned Citizens of Ogun State, adding that it had nothing to do with extradition.

    “So, the applicant (Kashamu) misled this court by lifting some of the orders made in that case, which were restricted to that particular petition. Justice Abang never made any order restraining the extradition process.

    “Kashamu does not want to submit to the enquiry on whether or not he should be extradited. The United States has made a request for his extradition. Should NDLEA fold its arms? How will that portray us to the international community? This application is a desperate attempt to put the security agencies in bad light,” he said.

    However, Oluyede contended that it was not true that there was an extradition request for Kashamu from the United States. “That claim is false and that is to put it mildly,” he said.

    He said if there was any such request, it would be addressed to the AGF, who would then apply to a court for extradition proceedings.

    “There is nothing like that addressed to the AGF,” he said, adding that NDLEA would have had no business with any such extradition request if indeed it was made, as only the AGF would be the prosecutor.

    But Sunday argued that based on Section 8 of the Extradition Act, any other person beside the AGF can make an application for a provisional warrant of arrest where there is an extradition request.

    “We urge your Lordship to dismiss this application for being an abuse court process,” he said.

    Earlier, Justice Buba dismissed Ngige’s application for stay of proceedings. The senior advocate had prayed the court to suspend further hearing of the case until his appeal against a ruling by Justice Buba barring Kashamu’s extradition is determined.

    The judge held that he would not be “bamboozled” into granting the application when the appeal had not been “entered”, adding that the contempt proceedings was sui generis (of its own kind; unique) and therefore he was duty-bound to determine it without being distracted.

    Justice Buba also refused to set aside his order, and dismissed Ngige’s application for an adjournment to enable him file a further affidavit to prove that the contempt proceedings was wrongly initiated.

    Oluyede, in the application, said the court on January 6, last year in suit FHC/L/ CS / 49/2010,  restrained security agencies from arresting Kashamu in respect of allegations contained in a petition dated December 18, 2009.

    Oluyede claimed that the alleged contemnors willfully and deliberately violated the judgment and court order under the pretense of responding to a request for Kashamu’s extradition made by the US government regarding allegations of the applicant’s complicity in narcotic offences committed in the US in 1994, a matter which Kashamu said had been decided by a British Court in 2003.

    He accused Giade of plotting  to preempt the judicial process by deploying about 50 fully armed NDLEA officials, pursuant to the verbal instruction of the AGF,  to invade Kashamu’s home around 4am on May 23.

    Justice Buba adjourned ruling till today.

     

  • Alleged contempt: Judge summons debt management’s boss, others

    Alleged contempt: Judge summons debt management’s boss, others

    Justice Mohammed Yunusa of a Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered the Director General, Debt Management Office (DMO), Abraham Nwankwo to appear before him on May 18 for alleged contempt.

    The judge made the order yesterday after Nwankwo and his co-defendant, Umaru Abubakar, were represented by a private lawyer, S.E. Omoraghon.

    Ecobank Nigeria Limited had filed a contempt charge against Nwankwo and Abubakar, who is the DMO’s officer in charge of processing fuel subsidy claims by oil marketers.

    The bank had claimed that the alleged contemnors frustrated its effort to recover debt of about N12 billion from an oil firm, First Deepwater Discovery Limited.

    It alleged that DMO refused to comply with the court’s order to transfer N845m, which according to the bank, was the subsidy claim ripe for payment to Deepwater by DMO, out of N1.8 billion.

    But DMO in counter-affidavit signed by its Principal Operations Officer, Sandra Ipigansi, had denied being in contempt, insisting that the agency was never in possession of subsidy claims by Deepwater.

    At the resumed hearing yesterday, the claimant’s lawyer, Kunle Ogunba (SAN), notified the court that the alleged contemnors, being officials of a public parastatal and facing such charges in their official capacity, were represented by a private practitioner without a fiat of the Attorney General and the Minister of Justice (AGF).

    Ogunba noted that DMO was also not represented in court, adding that it would be needful for the AGF to be represented in contempt proceedings against officers of the state.

    He said: “My Lord, I submit that it is important that the office of the Attorney General of the Federation be notified of the pending contempt proceedings against his officers, so that we do not take steps that will unwittingly embarrass the government, especially in this unstable political season.”

    However, counsel for Deepwater, D.A. Awosika, urged the court to suspend the contempt proceedings against Nwankwo and Abubakar, as well as give his client three weeks to settle with Ecobank.

    Awosika, who said there was a pending application before the court challenging its jurisdiction to entertain the suit, argued that nothing, including the contempt proceedings, ought to be done until his application was decided.

    In a bench ruling, while granting Deep Water’s prayer for time, the judge noted that the court could not overlook the fact that there was an order it made, which DMO had refused to obey.

    He consequently adjourned to May 18, for Nwankwo, Abubakar and a representative of the AGF to appear in court for the contempt proceedings.