In its bid to eradicate leprosy in the state and ease the burden of the disease on the victims, Anambra state government is offering a free medical treatment to 95 percent of people suffering from the ailment in the state, as well as offering free education to their wards. The state Commissioner for Health, Dr. Lawrence Ikeakor, who disclosed this in a press briefing to mark the World Leprosy Day, called on people inflicted with the disease to visit any of their local government secretariats to access free diagnosis, drugs, monetary cash and empowerment with immediate effect. He noted that workers and materials are available in all the headquarters of the 21 council areas in the state, and added that the government has also provided motorcycles to aid its officers in reaching-out and curing those suffering from the disease in the rural areas. While explaining that leprosy is a chronic fatigue caused by the germmycobacteria leprae, Dr. Ikeako hinted that the disease is curable when detected and followed in a right direction. The commissioner, who stressed that the disease is at the elimination stage in Anambra State, as large number of its previous victims have smiled home healthy and sound since the inception of Governor Peter Obi’s administration, urged the people to be kind and receptive to victims of the disease. His words: “It is lack of information that causes people to mock and isolate these people. It is not good to isolate people living with leprosy diseases, because they are our brothers and sisters. Sending them away from home is inhuman and barbaric. You should rather send whoever you discovered to your local government secretariat, and they will regain their health instantly without paying anything. It is part of the government free programme.” He said the World Leprosy Day is a day set aside by WHO to increase its awareness, signs and symptoms, as well as to mobilize support for those affected by the illness.” To avoid spreading the disease, the commissioner urged affected persons to be cautious of their activities, as the disease is transmittable through droplets from coughing and sneezing, especially through nasal discharges.
Tag: Anambra
-

N1.5 billion loan for Anambra farmers
The Anambra State Government said it would start disbursing an additional N1.5 billion loan to farmers in the state within the next two weeks.
The state Commissioner for Agriculture, Mr Ndubuisi Menakaya, told newsmen in Onitsha that the government obtained part of the money from the Bank of Agriculture (BoA).
He said the government was encouraged to obtain the loan after evaluating the “huge’’ success of the N1 billion allocated to the state under the N20 billion Commercial Agriculture loan fund provided by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) last year.
He noted that Governor Peter Obi had concluded arrangements for the loan, adding that it would be disbursed through the All Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN) Anambra chapter, with same conditions as the former loan.
“Anambra State Government, after seeing how successful the past scheme was, we are now partnering with the Bank of Agriculture to raise an additional N1.5 billion that we will give out to Anambra State farmers.
“And this N1.5 billion loan is also between N25,000 and N5 million (per farmer) with a 9.2 per cent interest rate and 12 months moratorium.
“This will be a loan directly with the Bank of Agriculture, where Anambra State puts its own money (40 per cent) and the Bank of Agriculture matches it with 60 per cent.
“This thing will take off within the next two weeks.”
He continued: “And Anambra State Government, through the Ministry of Agriculture, will recommend Anambra State farmers.
“Farmers, who are domiciled in Anambra State, it doesn’t have to be an Anambra State indigene. It is a farmer that is domiciled in Anambra State.
“Down the value chain, that is, all aspects of farming to food processing, to all aspects of agriculture, animal husbandry, fishery, crop production.
“So, through the value chain, we are going to support them.”
The loan range between a minimum of N25,000 and a maximum of N5 million, depending on the size of the farmer’s farm and needs.
-
Anambra oil communities commit to peace
Most communities of Nigeria oil and gas producing areas have inugurated a 20-man executive committee for the Anambra State Chapter chaired by Sir Kingsley Nnalue.
Inaugurating the committte at White View Hotels in Awka, the National President of the host communities, Chief A. M. Bubor from Bayelsa State said host communities are not violent as being speculated, adding that what they demand are their rights from government.
Their agitations were three things, according to him: namely, cancer penalty, DRPP levy and gas flaring money.
He said that those who brand host communities as problematic people do so in bad faith, adding that the commuinties are peace-loving people who are always calm.
Bubor further said that the 10 per cent equity signed with the host communities by the late president Musa Yar’Adua has been maintained by President Goodluck Jonathan, adding: “we are not a political party but we are more than a political party.”
In his inuagural address, the state chairman of the communities, Sir Kingsley Nnalue said he believed in the Barrack Obama slogan; “Yes, we can”, adding that they would make sure that there would not be any violence in the oil communities in the state.
Already, he said that they had initiated some youth and women empowerment programmes in the oil and gas communities.
According to him, “we have seven acres of land for agricultural purposes and also hiring out tractors for mechanised farming at cheaper rates, more empowerment programme will follow soonest,” Nnalue said.
-

‘Anambra election betrayed people’s confidence’
Chief George Muoghalu, a chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and Director-General, Senator Chris Ngige Campaign Organisation during the November 16, 2013 governorship election in Anambra State, in this interview with NWANOSIKE ONU, speaks on the election, its lapses, as well as the security situation in country, among other issues. Excerpts:
AS the influx of so many people, including governors, into the All Progressives Congress a blessing to the party or do you see danger in managing the defection?
APC is a brand, and what is happening is expected because the situation where we are today in the country, people have always clamoured for an alternative, a very viable alternative that will provide them with opportunity to express themselves. So it is expected because APC as a party is seen as that alternative and people are moving into APC in droves and there is nothing actually wrong with that because like I have always said in the past, a political party is like a church or mosque where you don’t restrict people from coming in, only that you must have rules and regulations and anybody coming into the party must accept basically that there are set out rules and a constitution governing the operations of the party and when you are moving into such an establishment, you must have it at the back of your mind that you are going into the establishment with a view to (i) abide by the rules and regulation of that organisation and bring in your quota to the development of the organisation and in this case, developing the polity. So I don’t see anything wrong with that. It is expected.
Do you think the PDP has collapsed?
No, I wouldn’t say that the PDP as a party has collapsed because they have government at the centre and they have government in some states but at the same time, sight should not be lost to the fact that there are some problems. They have internal problems which have been brought to the fore and one thing you must understand, because of the position of PDP as a party that controls the government at the center, issues and challenges, internal squabbles and whatever that is brought to the public domain, will certainly concern or affect every politician or affect the polity because of the vantage position they are occupying but that is not to say that the party has collapsed. The party is still there as a strong platform and an alternative also to the APC. For me, I don’t wish them collapsing, I wish them to be there so that some of us who have always wished that we have two strong political parties will have it in place.The APC on one side and the PDP on the other side so that each can call the other to order and provide alternative to the average Nigerian. If you think this side is not doing the right thing, you give the other the opportunity to implement their policies all with a view to improving on the livelihood of the average Nigerian which I believe very strongly in our party the APC is the main.The greatest concern to us as a party is the general welfare of Nigerians. So, I know they have not collapsed, but I wish them well.
Why did APC lose the Anambra election?
I make bold to say being an insider and at the forefront of what happened that there was practically no election in Anambra State. To say APC lost the election is totally unacceptable because it is not true. We found ourselves in a situation where both the government at the centre and the government in the state collaborated with the supposedly Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to manipulate the entire voting process with a view to installing a pre-determined candidate which I consider a betrayal of people’s trust and confidence. This is also the view of everybody, even the international community agrees with this view. What happened in Anambra State is a charade. What happened in Anambra State cannot be considered an election. If they want to test popularity of APC in the state, if they want to test the credibility or strength of any political organization, let them organize free, fair and credible elections. That is why we are asking for a total cancellation so that whoever is the popular candidate and acceptable to the people will win. If they do that, they know APC as a party will win the election in Anambra State ten times over. Let them stop deceiving themselves by saying there was an election. How can you say there was an election when the voters register had no integrity? What happened in Anambra was not an election because if it was an election, Jega won’t come out to say there were issues, so there was no election in Anambra State, what happened is not a basis for any test to determine the strength or the capacity of APC.If that is what they intend to do in Ekiti and Osun States, God help them because if that is their intention, I can guarantee you that our democracy will not survive its.
You are talking about the lapses in the voters register, is it not due to the inability of APC to organise and examine the voters register as provided by law prior to the elections?
What could we have done? We had no access to the register. There is an organisation called INEC whose responsibility it is to organise free, fair and credible election in Anambra State as in the entire country, but they failed woefully, what are we going to do as a party? There is a limit to what we can do. It is INEC that produces the voters register and it is INEC that plans and executes any election and as such is responsible for the materials. An organization brings voters materials at 5pm to a voting point and you expect voting to start and end at 6pm. Do we have access to the result sheet? INEC delivered materials to some points and withheld result sheets all in an attempt to manipulate the process to achieve a pre-determined result. There was no election; there was nothing we could have done as a party. Even the attention of the world was drawn to this manipulation before the election because I addressed a world press conference where I raised the issue of voters register manipulation. I raised the issue of late arrival of materials, in some cases outrightly non-delivery of electoral material, I raised the issue of withholding of result sheets. Virtually all media houses in the country attended that press briefing where these issues were raised by me and they still went ahead to do the same thing so what could we have done?
You raised these issues and you still participated in the election, why did you have to participate?
Because there were assurances that it was not going to happen; I raised the issue for them to know that we are already aware and INEC in Anambra State was quick to respond that it won’t happen, that we should not worry, that everything will be done right. It turned out that the only thing that went right was withholding result sheets or late arrival of materials and manipulation of the voters register where names of registered voters were removed to make sure a lot of people were disenfranchised, particularly in some local government areas.So what were we supposed to do? I had expected that having raised such issues, INEC would have been honest and sincere enough to prevent such things from happening because they had re-assured us that it will not happen and the whole thing happened the same day, so what could we have done? Practically nothing.
The concern of a lot of your supporters is funding and mutual suspicion amongst all the parties that merged. There were speculations that Ngige had problems of funding prior to the election, what is your take on that?
I make bold to say that funding wasn’t a problem. In actual fact, what are you doing with the funding? Your funding is to handle your logistics affairs and we had no problem or challenge handling our logistics. We had no problem with that. Funding was not an issue at all. One thing about an election is that any amount of money you put into it will surely finish, whether it is in billions or trillions. It is just for the organisation to plan properly, applying the funds available to their specific needs to achieve desired results and that is exactly what we did. So funding wasn’t an issue at all.
But could you have won an election of this magnitude without the backing of other governors under the APC platform? Were APC governors supportive?
The entire APC governors backed the project; I can say that without fear of contradiction. If you recall, a month or so before the election, all the APC governors met in Nasarawa State and the only agenda for that meeting was the Anambra election and all our governors were in attendance, except for one or two who sent their deputies because they were out of the country. How else would they have demonstrated their commitment, some of the governors visited during the campaign in Anambra State to see how we were doing, some came before the election to encourage us, ask question and to see how we were doing. So the governors were totally committed to the project.
But media reports showed that the fund raising dinner you organised in Lagos was a flop because people did not buy up the project.
That is not true
So can you talk us through what really happened then?
Governor of Lagos State hosted a fund raising dinner for Ngige in Lagos and it was successful. Anybody saying something contrary is lying, the videos are there, newspaper publications are there. Captains of industry came, politicians came. Please note that a governor must not appear in person to support a project. Governors could decide to host dinners for a project in their states. Don’t forget that as governors, they enjoy a level of goodwill among their subjects, their contractors and their friends. They can tell their friends to please support Mr. A. Don’t forget also that there is a limit an individual can give in line with electoral guidelines and we are very conscious of that fact.
So what really happened to the political class in Anambra? Your detractors are insisting that one of the reasons why Ngige couldn’t fly or win in this election was that the political class did not endorse him.
Who are the political class? We are the political class; I am from Anambra State, and we are the political class.
They insisted that no politician of note in Anambra supported him.
That is not true. A lot of notable politicians keyed into the project. Those that have value to add, not just anybody.
Anybody else?
There are so many more who endorsed him who may not be known to you. To drive this point home, let me bring in an Igbo proverb that says “When a child is sent to visit a family, even if he meets the parents and older siblings at home, but did not see his or her friend because of whom he or she visited that house, if you ask him whether he saw anyone at home, he will say there was nobody at home when he visited” because as far as he is concerned, there was nobody because the person he expected to see was not there. That is exactly the problem of Anambra State politics. There are specific people who have either out of popularity or notoriety made themselves identifiable as politicians in Anambra State. If you don’t see them in any particular project, you are likely to assume that those people are not supportive and such names in some instances are nuisances, they have no political value to add to you rather they major minuses. There is no law that says all of these credible ones must be together because there are many political parties and interests. There are credible people in the APC, PDP, APGA, Labour Party and others but it is a matter of who is the person, what is his pedigree, what is his style. How has he been in the system, what role has he played? These are questions the person himself may not be able to answer. For the purpose of this election, there were three or four major candidates and these candidates have their individual friendships spread across the political class and they have took advantage of it. There is no way you will expect that one person will attract all. For example, I am identifiable with the APC project, if you are looking for me therefore in the PDP project and you don’t find me you will be right to assume that there are no members of the political class there because it is me you are looking for. If you go to APGA you assume there are none because it is me you are looking for but when you are not looking for me, you are looking for another politician, if you don’t find him in APC you conclude there is no political class there. That is exactly the scenario.
There are reports that a lot of the Deputy Directors of the Ngige Campaign Organisation who handled sensitive positions are people of questionable character. This reflected in the scenario where you were actually fighting against the status quo before your appointment as the DG of the organisation.
If there was any structure before APC, as far as I am concerned, it is immaterial. I am concerned as to the point of the campaigns and elections because Ngige Campaign Organisation is a creation of the National Leadership of the party of which I was at the point of commencement, the Deputy Chairman. Later I became chairman and the Director General which therefore meant I was to run the entire campaign with lieutenants and we had a structure that had two Deputy DGs with about 15 directorates headed by a director and in some instances two deputy directors depending on the size or scope of the directorate. We also had about 15 committees that had specific responsibilities. Each committee had a chairman, deputy chairman and a secretary and that was the way we built up the structure and I must be bold enough to say that I had the support and loyalty of the deputy DGs and all other officers in the organization. In fact everybody accepted my leadership of the organization and we worked as a team and as a family. I didn’t have any challenge as to the status quo because there was no status quo; there was no campaign organisation before I came to take over. We came with the campaign organisation; we started with it up and until now, we are the drivers, we ran the process, so I had no challenge, no issues regarding status quo. But you must understand one thing, you are dealing with human beings. Everybody or most people have their own expectations; a lot of people also have what they expect as results, how they expect their own result. It is a case of 9 + 1 = 10, 1 + 1 + 8 = 10 and 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 5 = 10. The question is achieving the answer, the process may vary from Mr. A to B. Some people may not accept the way I want things done. They may wish it is done their way but unfortunately, I was in charge. But in such situation as a leader, if I think you have a different process of achieving the same result, I call you, hear you out then try and convince you, using my own modus operandi. I compare what I have side by side with your own then at the end of the day, it is either I convince you or you convince me, but the important thing is that we must to achieve the result. That is how we worked so I didn’t have any challenge, so to speak.
But your detractors see some of these directors, stakeholders and keyholders as people who did not have the capacityand credibility to win their Local Governments, Wards or even booths, so they ask how Dr. Ngige can bring these people to work with you, because the whole thing became a case of old wine in a new bottle.
Fine, you see the issue of winning wards or Local Governments is not a basis for assessing the capacity of the peopleyou are working with, reason being simple; there was no election. If you come to somebody’s local government for example, you bring voters register that has no integrity, you manipulate their result, you withhold the result sheet, you deliver materials late and at the end of the day you say the man did not deliver, you are not being fair. If there was free, fair credible election, a voter’s register with integrity, materials delivered on time, election conducted, result sheet available and results announced, if those process were followed and at the end of the day the person fails to deliver then you can blame the person. There are circumstances also that may affect an individual’s capacity to deliver within his local government or ward. That is not to say that I will like to defend non performance, no I will not defend non performance, I will rather support and encourage performance, but I must also not lose sight of the fact that when a deliberate impediment is placed on the way, there is practically nothing the person can do and more so, we must not expect to win in the entire 21 local government areas of the state reason being that the candidates who are running the same election with you, have their individual strongholds. Strongholds that were built out of sentiments and/or performance which you cannot wish away. For example, there is no way my people will like a stranger more than they like me, especially when I have the pedigree. These are the realities you must put into account if you are making any honest political assessment.
Can you beat your chest and say that Dr. Chris Ngige was actually prepared for this election? I asked this question with regard to the allegation that he lacks inter-personal skills; he did not reach out to the business community that no businessman of note in Anambra backed or endorsed him.
The mistake you are making about backing and endorsement is that most notable businessmen will not come out in the open to back a candidate to avoid jeopardizing his business interest.
Is that not debatable?
Sure it can be debated, it is not rocket secure but the point is that some people may decide to take the risk. So the businessmen who supported him may have done so devoid of the expected publicity as they may have businesses running with the Federal Government, knowing fully well that Federal Government is antagonistic to the man’s ambition, they might have projects with the state government knowing fully well also that the state government is antagonistic towards the man’s ambition, so these are realities that cannot be ignored. You must take this into account in making any assessment. As for preparation, I can beat my chest and say the man was prepared for the election.
As a person or as a candidate?
As a person and as a candidate, there are certain things you cannot take away from him; you cannot take away his popularity, which is anchored on experience, having been there before. So a good percentage of the people who are aligned to him, are aligned to him on that note.They keep saying that if he could do all he did within a space of three years when he was Governor before, if he is given the opportunity, he will do better and he will improve on what he did in the past.That is why the campaign was anchored on experience counts.
Let’s look at APC at the national level with regards to the 2015 general elections. Most people feel that APC is a paper tiger, just blowing hot air?
APC as a party is fully prepared for election; we only keep throwing this challenge to the establishment, give us the enabling environment, we want an INEC that is truly independent, committed to delivering on their mandate of providing free, fair credible election.Their mentality must change; their attitude must change if they are sincere about giving us a credible election in 2015. We are asking the security agencies to see themselves more as Nigerians who have a responsibility to Nigerians more than an individual or a political party who certainly will go one day, they must be neutral. Once this tool is put in place, the responsibility of voter education lies both with INEC and the parties, to keep educating the voting public.As for being prepared, APC as a party is fully prepared and will continue to prepare for elections. I remember I told you sometime back that the strength we have, which I pray we don’t deviate from, is internal democracy. Whatever it will take, I am among those who will continue to champion it, I know the party is focused on it, there must be internal democracy in APC as a political party, and we must have internal democracy, create the enabling environment for everybody to everybody. Everybody has to have access to power, if you are the popular candidate of your people, you must be allowed to contest election, whoever wins primaries should be the candidate, whoever shows interest to contest for any office, please allow him to contest.The moment we agree on all these things, I am sure we will be on cruise control and the party will continue to grow. The only time we are going to have problem is when we deviate from theseprinciples. These progressive principles we laid down by ourselves as a guide.
Talking about deviating from principles, from 1999 to date, most Nigerians accuse PDP of lacking in ideology and one thing that people see in APC is that they are equally ideologically bankrupt because it has become an all comers affairs and at the end of the day, there is no single ideological point to where you can say, this is why APC is existing other than the craze and crave for power.
I will recommend that you read our manifesto and constitution.If you read the two; you will understand basically that progressism and the welfare of the people are the two key cardinal points in the party. As to people who are coming in, if you are willing to follow the rules, you are welcome because we already have a manifesto written down and we agree that everybody must implement this manifesto and the manifesto covers every aspect of our national life.
But you have an infusion of PDP governors who have been governors for almost 8 years and they were not ideologically driven, they were just there to share the money according to some Nigerians and now they have joined APC……………
I don’t agree
They have joined you
The governors, who came into the APC today, have a track record of performance. Would you say Kwakwanso is not performing, would you say Wamako is not performing, would you say Amaechi is not performing? Or the Kwara man, what about Al-makura. Who amongst them will you boldly fault? Except if you are blinded by bias.
That is your own opinion and it is debatable.
Certainly, there is no situation that is not debatable; it depends on the angle you are coming from, but there are empirical evidence to judge this people, but one thing everybody has been preaching is; when you come into a new system, you certainly will adapt, there may be changes you have to make in your operational methodology because the truth is that you are coming into a progressive party built on the premise of equality, justice and good governance , anchored on the welfare of the people. The sum total is; where does the average Nigerian stand in your calculation. We are saying things are not right, we want to change it. We are saying that the peoples vote must count; we are saying that the people must be the reason for government; we are saying that the educational system has collapsed; we are saying healthcare delivery has practically collapsed, we must look at them. We are talking about security, we say we must look at them, we are talking about power and these are issues we have taken and studied critically and came out with a manifesto which I recommend to every Nigerian.
Beyond the manifesto sir, you are talking about Amaechi and others; Governor Amaechi gets close to N20b per month from the Federal account.
I had to talk about them because you mentioned the governors that came in but if you want to assess the performance of our governors, I will give you reference points.
Please do
Go to Lagos , go to Borno, go to Zamfara, go to Yobe, go and see what is happening there.
But is Amaechi a reference point?
Why not?
With N20b every month and some people in Rivers State are insisting that he has not done anything with the money?
You must not fail to note that the people who speak to the media may not be the people who speak the mind of the people.
Is that not the same thing you said?
That is an independent opinion, get down to Rivers State and see what is on ground, look at what the state was before he came in because when you are making an assessment of anybody, you assess him or her from the point where he started, where he is and where he is going to. It will not be fair if you start assessing somebody without knowing where he is coming from. The issue of Rivers State getting N20b has been there, Akwa-Ibom gets far more than that, Delta State gets far more than that so, when you are assessing Rivers State, you assess him taking account of where he is coming from, where he is and where he is going to. When you look at states like Zamfara, Borno and Yobe, despite the challenges of insecurity, go there and see practical governance, go to Lagos today, go to Ekiti and Edo , go to Oyo, go to Ogun, these are practical things, it is something you go and see for yourself.
Have you been to Jigawa or Katsina?
The last time I spoke to you, I said Jigawa and Katsina governors are doing well.
So would you want to compare somebody who collects N20b monthly to somebody who collects N3b?
Compare Katsina with Zamfara and Borno, these are states that are on the same pedestal. If you say Amaechi gets N20b, compare him with Delta that will be a fair comparison. You can’t compare Amaechi who gets N20b and Zamfara who gets N3b. Look at Imo State ; compare it to any other South-Eastern State except Enugu . Just look at Imo State in 2years compare to other states in the south-east. You are talking about something that is practical, go to Owerri, go to Okigwe, to go Orlu. You see governance in practical terms and you ask yourself where this state was before this man came in? Where is it today and where will it be tomorrow, what is it going to be like after four years, if this can be achieved in two years. So if you are talking about states that get N20b, compare them with other states that get N20b. It will be an unfair comparison if you compare Akwa-Ibom with a state like Zamfara because what Akwa-Ibom gets in one month is what Zamfara get in one year.
But supporters of President Goodluck Jonathan’s presidency have insisted that if you want to do comparison in the aviation and agricultural industry before he came into power, he has done a great job………….
At what cost, let us put the cost implication on the table.
But you never said anything about cost implication in what Amaechi is doing
Yes, you mentioned Amaechi gets N20b, I said fair enough, he gets N20b but if you want to compare him, compare him with Delta that gets over N20b, compare him with Akwa-Ibom that gets over that, if you want to compare Zamfara, look for a state that gets N3b, if you want to compare Borno look for a state that gets within the range of N4b, despite the security challenges there.
So are you saying the Federal Government has not done anything in agriculture? Because the Minister of Agriculture, recently got an award from Forbes Magazine because of his strides in Agriculture. Aviation is another sector that has witnessed a lot of positive innovation. Are you not recognizing these marked achievements?
It will be unfair to say there is none, there is improvement no doubt. But then, is there where we should be?
And the Niger Delta Ministry for instance…….
For the Niger Delta Ministry, it was created to address the imbalance, to address the failures of previous government as it concerns the Niger Delta people and it is commendable.
What is your take on the importance of the ministry?
The fundamental issue here is that we already have a Niger Delta Affairs Ministry to address the imbalance; I therefore want to commend the government for appreciating that there is a need to correct an imbalance. The leadership as at then who created the ministrymust be commended; they should also be commended for what they are doing now because the important thing is that you are addressing the issues that concern the people. I am a people-oriented politician and anything that has to do with alleviating the challenges of the people, the imbalance, the unfair treatment at any point in time, no matter who is involved, I am for it. So I am totally for the Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs, I also want to use this medium to appeal that it should be properly funded. For example, this East-West road is almost a National embarrassment. It is a key project in the Niger Delta region, that once it is delivered, you will notice some improvement both in the economic development of that area. So I can’t sit here and tell you that the federal government has done nothing.That would be very unfair. I am not a politician who criticizes just for the fun of it. Any time I criticize any particular policy of government, I try to proffer an alternative. The point I have made is that, yes there is improvement in the aviation sector no doubt about it, but at what cost, a lot more still has to be done.
Talking about APC’s convention in 2014, speculations are rife that people like you are gunning for the removal of the zoning process so that it will enable you run for the chairmanship of the party, what is your take on this?
Well, speculation is part of political life. Anybody can speculate anything, I believe that there is need for zoning so that every interest will be accommodated, so that there will be equity. As for the speculation, I like you to know that once you are in the open, anybody can say anything about you. Some of these speculations are anchored on confidence, some may feel that you are good to do something; some may also feel that you are qualified to do something and the speculation can be built based on that. But I believe my main concern today is that we should first build a strong party, we need a strong party before we start talking of who aspires to be what. When the convention comes, we will be able to take our decision, but what I can tell you confidently is that there is consultation going on everywhere.
But are you going to contest for something even though you don’t know what to contest for as it is now?
Yes I am consulting very widely. I am not a politician who dabbles into things, I like to consult. I like knowing what my friends, supporters and leaders think so that you don’t make any mistake. It is not a do-or-die thing; it is about offering service, it is about bringing to bear your experience, knowledge and what have you. But when you take this into account, you still have to understand that in every structure, there is leadership, there are interest groups and you must work in tandem with that. And that is why I said for now, we are still consulting and when we finish with the consultation, we will issue a statement to that effect.
Finally, let us look at the issue of security. Few months ago before now, it was like hell let loose in Nigeria but thank God during the Christmas period, we did not hear of bombings, killings and all that, it looks like finally Mr. President has gotten hold of the security issues in the country, do you agree?
We have had a lot of issues on security, but that we did not have any incidence in very strategic places in the country during this holidays is a welcome development and I am happy about it. This is one area nobody wants to play politics with because you can’t talk about driving an economy in an insecure environment. For me, anything that can be done, any sacrifice that can be made to make the country safe should be of primary consideration because I see it as a primary responsibility of government and I welcome it. So we will keep praying that everybody concerned will live up to expectation and live up to their responsibilities.
Just before you go, still talking about security, INEC has said that the states under emergency rule may not be up for elections in 2015, what is your take on this?
It is a joke because like the governor of Borno said which makes so much sense, the moment you say that, you have given in to the insurgents, you have confirmed that they are in charge, so you don’t do such a thing and more so, with the recent local government election in Yobe State which was reported as free, fair and peaceful with a large turnout has made nonsense of that assertion, so I think that we should not think about that, INEC should prepare themselves and go and conduct elections in those states at the proper
-

Five years without polio in Anambra
Do you have a stiff neck or back? Or do you have sensations of abnormal reflexes, or trouble with swallowing and breathing? You just might need a physician to run a lab test. It could be polio.
But for five years, no such symptoms or conditions have been recorded in Anambra State, thanks to a comprehensive health plan of the state government.
Two frontline international foundations run by two of the world’s greatest philanthropists, Dangote Foundation and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, have set a target to wipe out polio in Nigeria by end of 2014. They are Chairman, Dangote Foundation, Alhaji Aliko Dangote and Co-Chair, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Mr Gates, made the promise in Lagos.
Dangote said the rate of polio in Nigeria, which has now reduced to about 51 per cent, would be kicked out completely by the end of this year as a result of ongoing efforts by the two foundations.
He said they have intensified campaign to make sure that children in the states where polio is prevalent are vaccinated. Dangote confirmed that they have been receiving support from northern leaders and that many families have agreed to get the vaccine.
On his part, Mr. Gates said they are collaborating to wipe out polio in Nigeria because they believe it will help to improve the lives of people and move the economy forward.
Gates further said that the security crisis in the Northeast, especially in Borno and Yobe states, is undermining the fight to eradicate polio in the country. He noted that a lot of problems still remained as some states do not pick up the best vaccines while others do not release money as and when due for the implementation of the campaign.
President/Chief Executive of the Dangote Group, Aliko Dangote, has initiated a reward system that would encourage folks in rural areas to take part in the routine polio immunisation programme, in all the 44 local governments of Kano State.
Dangote promised that women who present their children for immunization would be rewarded with free Dangote household products such as noodles, pasta and sugar. He also proposed a more regular meeting of the stakeholders to assess the strategy in order to accelerate the pace of progress recorded so far.
The Dangote Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Kano State Government had last November signed a Memorandum of Understanding to embark on strategies aimed at eradicating polio from the state. The partnership agreement also includes strengthening immunization as a core component of Primary Health Care (PHC).
Minister of State for Health, Ali Pate, expressed satisfaction that Nigeria was on course to eradicating the disease, adding that President Goodluck Jonathan has directed that all the necessary funding be made available for the programme.
In Anambra, Governor Obi said the state would remain polio-free as his government was determined to keep tackling health challenges of any form in the State.
At the flag off of the Anambra state 2013 National Immunization Plus Days (NIPDs) at the Primary Health Centre Uboma, Ukpor in Nnewi South Local Government Area of Anambra State, Ikeakor explained that the objective of the NIPDs which is safe and free is to ensure that every child born in Anamabra State receives two potent oral polio vaccine, to sustain the interruption of wild polio virus in the state and to scale up delivery of other routine immunisation antigens and other child survival interventions.
Dr. Ikeakor stressed further that the target population will receive OPV antigen for children from 0-59 months, BCG, DPT, HBV antigens for children under 1 year of age, measles and yellow fever vaccine for children of nine months of age and tetanus toxoid for pregnant women and women child bearing age, adding that special team will be employed to stay at strategic and transit positions to give OPV to children.
Obi flanked by his wife Mrs. Margaret Obi, Commissioner for Women Affairs and Social Development, Lady Henrietta Agbata, her lands counterpart, Barr. Chibuzor Okoli Akirika and some development partners said that Anambra State will be more aggressive in this year’s routine immunization to ensure that Anambra children are healthy.
“We are here for polio immunization” Obi said. “We did it on quarterly basis last year but this year, it will be monthly because we want to be very aggressive to ensure that our people are healthy. Every child is important to us as we cannot afford to lose any of them as a result of ill health”. While his wife Mrs. Margaret Obi in an interview attested to the fact that Anambra is polio-free, she stressed the need to sustain the onslaught against the white polio virus in the state. Obi, accompanied by his wife, Margaret, daughter, Amaka kicked the exercise off by administering immunisation to many children. He said that he always tried to grace the campaign personally because children, who were the future of the society were concerned. He maintained that any society that neglected to take care of its children and the youth would suffer the consequences in future.
The Governor who expressed happiness over the improvement in all health indices of the State, including the accreditation of major health institutions in the state that lost accredited before he took over Government, promised that he would not relent.
Obi thanked those collaborating with the government in the fight against polio. His words: ”We thank our partners – WHO, UNICEF, World Bank, Bill and Melinda Gates, DFID, USAID, Red Cross, Rotary International, National Primary Health Care Development Agency and others for their contributions. We will continue to partner with them in our concerted effort to eradicate polio. Our commitment to achieving the MDGs and making our people healthy and happy is total. Today, again, I wish to reaffirm our resolve”.
The representative of Rotary Club, Rotarian Chika Ekwueme expressed happiness that for five years, Anambra has remained polio-free, which he attributed to the governor’s commitment to the people of the State and lauded the target of 2 million children for immunization during the Prof Amobi Ilika era as commissioner which the incumbent Dr Lawrence Ikeakor continued.
Development partners, Dr. Rosemary Oyibe and Mr. Diden Gbofeyin who represented WHO and UNICEF respectively harped on the need to stamp out polio in Nigeria. Mr. Gbofeyin avvered that antigens will be used to boost their coverage and urged all stakeholders, community based organizations to make health facilities work while Dr. Rosemary maintained that eradication of polio in Nigeria is synonymous with eradication of polio in the world.
Immunization of the children by Gov. Peter Obi and his wife, Margaret and distribution of long life insecticide treated net, soaps and biscuits to the parents of the children formed the highlight of the ceremony.
Some parents, Mary Okoli, Monica Udebalu and Basilia Obiagha thanked the governor for performing the immunization exercise and for the gifts and assured him of their continued support for the polio campaign and prayers in the area.
At another flag off at Atani, The Secretary to the State Government, Mr. Oseloka Obaze said the exercise should be embraced by all to promote the health of children.
The Permanent Secretary Ministry of Health, Dr. Austin Nnalue commended the mass turn-out by people for the programme and assured that the campaign will be sustained to keep polio away from the State.
The Transition Committee Chairman, Ogbaru Local Government, Mr. Steve Chukwuma thanked the Governor for his determination to promote the health of the people.
Also speaking the Transition Committee Chairman, Ihiala Local Government Area, Mr. Chinedu Ukachukwu noted that the Governor has brought a new dawn in the health sector.
Mr. Ukachukwu said the well equipped Primary Health Centre in various communities have given people easy access to healthcare facilities.
Then transition Committee Chairman of Onitsha North, Barr. Egwuoyibo Okoye thanked Gov. Obi, and his wife for their choice of Nnewi South for this month’s flag off of while polio virus in the state. He commended the governor for his massive road construction in the area and assured him that Nnewi South will surely throw their weight behind his anointed candidate come this year’s governorship election in the state.
These commitments to eliminate polio earned Obi an award as the best performing governor on the eradication of polio in the southeast from Bill Gates and Melinda Foundation at a massively attended ceremony at the Women’s Development Centre in Awka.
Speaking while presenting the award to Gov Obi which went with a cash prize of N120 million, the minister of state for health, Dr Mohammad Bate said the award was not by chance as Gov Obi had distinguished himself in the health sector which he observed had resulted in the provision of ambulances to hospitals, accreditation of schools of midwifery and the wonderful partnership with the Church and described the Anambra example as a total package, noting that the state had remained polio free in the past five years.
Responding, Obi thanked the minister for coming to the state to present the award on behalf of Bill Gates and Melinda Foundation and noted with satisfaction that it was not one of the awards anyone could suspect as having been bought and said the state government would match the N120m it received with another N180m which would be ploughed into the building of ten more health centres in the state.
Recalling some of his strides in the health sector, he cited the state’s first teaching hospital as an example.
‘What happened was that the government of the day admitted medical students without a medical school in place and the assessors said they would not accredit the university but I pleaded with them when I came in to give me two or three years to put a teaching hospital in place but they could not believe me as they thought it impossible that a teaching hospital could be built in two, three years. It was one of them that pleaded with them to give me a chance and they did. When they returned at the appointed time they were shocked to see the teaching hospital in place. It has since become the fastest teaching hospital to be built in Nigeria,’ Obi stated to the applause of the packed audience.
A member of the state legislature Hon Nikky Ugochukwu, congratulated the governor on his award and said it was expected, given his unprecedented achievements in office and also commended him for his youth friendly disposition.
The two events were attended by top government functionaries, traditional rulers, student nurses and stake holders.
And Obi announced that his government will use the money it won from being the best State in immunization programme in the South-East to build 10 maternities in remote parts of the State.
Obi announced it during the flag-off of the National Obstetric Fistula Repair Programme at the Amaku Teaching Hospital, Awka. He said that the State had matched the 1 million dollars monetary award with 120 Million Naira for the project.
The Governor also flagged-off the fumigation exercise against mosquitoes in the State. He said the exercise was part of the State Government programme towards elimination of malaria. He called on the people of the State to corporate with those carrying out the fumigation exercise since it is for their own good.
In his remarks, the Vice Chancellor of Anambra State University, Prof. Fidelis Okafor thanked the Governor for turning the State University ground. He invited the people to visit the campus of the University at Igbariam and witness the transformation going on there.
Already work has commenced the building of 10 maternity projects in 10 rural communities of Anambra State. The project which will cost N30m per one is partly funded by the N150m prize money Anambra State received by coming first in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation award as the best State in the South-East in immunization. Anambra State Government is providing the rest of the money.
The benefiting communities are: Ugwuagba, Umuchu, Awba-Ofemili, Urum, Umueje,Umudioka, Isseke, Azigbo and Umunze.
-

Funeral for woman
The death has occurred of Mrs Theresa Mottoh, on October 13.
She will be buried on Friday after a funeral service at 4B, Dibor Lane, Akwa in Anambra State.
Guests will be entertained at 4B, Dibor Lane, Akwa.
-

Will Anambra election stand?
Since the November 16 “inconclusive” Anambra State governorship election, the country has known no rest. Matters were not helped by the insistence of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to hold a supplementary election last Saturday, which was boycotted by All Progressives Congress (APC), Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Labour Party (LP). The poll was marred by apathy. In this report, ERIC IKHILAE analyses the Electoral Act and INEC’s conduct.
Will the governorship election held in Anambra State stand? This is the question on the lips of many.
It came as a shock to Nigerians that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), after admitting that the poll was flawed, refused to cancel it.
Rather, the commission went ahead to conduct supplementary election in several local government areas of the state. The option left for the agrieved, it seems, is to resort to the court. But will justice be done?
Some analyst are concerned that the election should not have been allowed to end in court in the first place, as it seems likely to. They see it as being unfair to those who were victims of an election that was not credible, especially where litigants may be denied justice based on technicalities.
The realisation of the importance of a free and fair election in ensuring a sustained democracy and prosperous political system, accounts for why most democracies in the world strive for perfection in their electoral processes.
Unfortunately, INEC has consistently failed to deliver on its mandate since the return to democracy in 1999 despite the various provisions in the Constitution and the Electoral Act.
The Constitution empowers INEC to conduct and regulate the conduct of the federal elections, the governorship and House of Assembly elections, while the Electoral Act provides the road map for the execution of these tasks.
Until its disastrous outing in the Anambra governorship election, everyone had thought that INEC has learnt its lesson and was willing to perfect its acts before the 2015 general election.
INEC’s failure to deliver on what many had thought was an easy meal, despite the huge men and materials at its disposal, has resulted in a monumental national embarrassment that has made a mess of the assurances by President Goodluck Jonathan and INEC’s leadership to establish a transparent electoral process.
Having bungled the November 16 Anambra governorship election, INEC, reached for the Electoral Act for powers to declare the election inconclusive. In the process, it cancelled the results of elections in 210 polling units, across 16 local governments of the state’s 21 local governments.
Despite the call from many quarters that the entire election, having been marred by serious acts of non-compliance with the Electoral Act, should be cancelled, INEC, who had equally admitted that the election was flawed, has gone ahead to conduct what it called supplementary election last Saturday.
Opposition parties and election observers, had in their calls for total cancellation of the entire election, cited instances where majority of voters in the opposition’s stronghold, were deliberately disenfranchised by INEC, who failed to provide them with voting materials on time; cases of underage voting in places controlled by the ruling party, and the utilisation of a voters’ register without names of majority of the registered voters, thereby denying about 70 per cent of the state’s voters the right to vote.
The most glaring of such cases was that of the People’s Democratic Party’s (PDP) candidate, whose entire household, including his father, mother, uncles and aunties could not locate their names on the voters’ register and were denied the right to vote.
One of the opposition parties, the All Progressives Con
gress (APC) took its protest further when it petitioned
INEC and followed the petition with a protest rally by its leadership, where the party urged the electoral body to exercise its powers under the Electoral Act to cancel the election.
The party predicated its demand on the serious irregularities and non-compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act 2010, which it said, characterised the conduct of the election. It argued that the commission is duly empowered, under the Electoral Act, to reject the election’s results
“A correct reading of the Electoral Act 2010, as amended, is to the effect that your commission cannot reverse itself where a candidate in the election has been returned as a winner. This has not been done. Indeed, your commission had on Monday, November 18, 2013 declared the election as inconclusive,” the party said in its petition.
APC added that in an electoral process, a Ward or Local Government Collation Officer, who stands in the same position as State Collation/Returning Officer can cancel or reject results submitted to him/her at Ward or Local Government level, where the result is tainted with vice or irregularities.
A lawyer, Rotimi Fasakin, argued that since a winner was not announced, it was still within to cancel the election. He cited Section 27(2f) of the 2010 Electoral Act (as amended) which provides that “ The Returning Officer shall announce the result and declare the winner of the election at: (f) State Collation Centre in the case of election of a Governor of a State.”
Fasakin said since the Returning Officer did not declare a winner, INEC has no excuse not to cancel an election which it admitted was massively flawed.
“Did the action specified in Section 27 (2f) of the Electoral Act take place at the state collation centre? If not, would that not mean that the results have not been declared and the electoral process, according to the electoral law, is still under the control of INEC?
“Can the court adjudicate on an electoral process that is inchoate and effectively still under INEC’s purview and control?
“How can INEC have power to cancel 113,113 votes and suddenly become powerless to cancel others that bore the imprimatur of the same inimitable INEC tardiness and corruption?” Fasakin said.
The lawyer accused INEC of choosing when to use the court as an excuse and when not to obey its orders.
Despite these arguments, INEC had stuck to its gun, insisting that it was incapable of cancelling the entire election in the face of the provision of Section 68(1) of the Electoral Act. The section provides that “the decision of the Returning Officer on any question arising from or relating to-(a) unmarked ballot paper; (b) rejected ballot paper; and (c) declaration of scores of candidates and the return of a candidate, shall be final subject to review by a tribunal or court in an election petition proceedings under this Act.”
The commission argued that though it cancelled part of the Anambra election results and declared the election inconclusive, it could not cancel the entire election since its Returning Officer has announced the results. It is its position that the only opinion was for it to conduct a supplementary election, while those aggrieved should head for the tribunal, which it argued, possesses the powers to order a rerun election.
Law experts are, however, of the view that INEC’s position will only result in handing a poisoned chalice to the purported winner, because its conduct and utterance has prepared the ground for a monumental legal disputation.
According to Donald Ujokanma, despite the provision of Section 68 of the Electoral Art, there are other provisions of the same Act that empower INEC to either reschedule election or cancel an already held election without recourse to the court or tribunal.
He cited Section 54(3) for instance, which provides that “Where the votes cast at an election in any polling unit exceed the number of registered voters in that polling unit, the result of the election for that polling unit shall be declared null and void by the Commission and another election may be conducted at a date to be fixed by the Commission where the result at that polling unit may affect the overall result in the Constituency.”
This provision, he argue, presupposes that since INEC can declare results from a polling unit where over voting occurs , null and void, it could be taken that the Commission can also declare the entire process in the constituency null and void, where it discovers that there had been widespread disenfranchisement of voters and irregularities and electoral malpractices.
Another lawyer, Jiti Ogunye also argued that by proceeding with its supplementary election, INEC has also breached the provisions of the Electoral Act.
He noted that INEC, under the Act can only vary the date of an election prior to the holding of election and not midway into the conduct of the election as was done in Anambra. He refered to the provision of Section 26 of the Act.
Section 26(1) provides that “where a date has been appointed for the holding of an election, and there is reason to believe that a serious breach of the peace is likely to occur if the election is proceeded with on that date or it is impossible to conduct the elections as a result of natural disasters or other emergencies, the Commission may postpone the election and shall in respect of the area, or areas concerned, appoint another date for the holding of the postponed election, provided that such reason for the postponement is cogent and verifiable”.
Section 26 (3, 4 &5) further provides that “ where the Commission appoints a substituted date in accordance with subsections (1) and (2) of this Section, there shall be no return for the election until polling has taken place in the area or areas affected”; “ notwithstanding the provision of subsection (3) of this section, the Commission may, if satisfied that the result of the election will not be affected by voting in the area or areas in respect of which substituted dates have been appointed, direct that a return of the election be made”; and that “ the decision of the Commission under subsection (4) may be challenged by any of the contestants at a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction and on such challenge, the decision shall be suspended until the matter is determined”.
Ogunye challenged the legitimacy of INEC’s decision to conduct supplementary election. It is argued that the phrase, supplementary election is unknown to any law in the country, including the Electoral Law.
He argued that the only elections recognised, under the Electoral Act include the general election, bye election, fresh election or rerun election and run-off election.
That aside, an Abuja based lawyer, Dr. David Garuba argued that INEC’s failure to ensure that elections hold simultaneously in all polling units throughout the state was a breach of the provision of the Electoral Act intended to ensure that the electoral process was free and fair.
He noted that Sections 125 and 148 of the Electoral Act which were intended meet the “requirement of secrecy in voting” and “secrecy of ballot” during election were violated when elections were not conducted on the same day and at the same time.
He argued that the election in Anambra can no longer be said to be secret or credible, free and fair when it was rendered inconclusive and the results partly released, with the intention of giving a picture of who the overall winner will eventually be, as was the case in Anambra after the November 16 election.
Section 125(1) provides that “any person in attendance at a polling unit including every officer charged with the conduct of an election and his or her assistants and every polling agent and candidate in attendance at a polling station or at the collation centre, as the case may be, shall maintain and aid in maintaining the secrecy of the voting.”
Subsection 2 states that “no person in attendance at a polling booth under this section shall, except for some purpose authorised by law, communicate to any person information as to the name or number on the register of any voter who has or has not voted at the place of voting.”
Subsection 3 says: “No person shall (a) interfere with a voter casting his vote, or by any other means obtain or attempt to obtain in a polling unit information as to the candidate for whom a voter in that place is about to vote for or has voted for; or (b) communicate at any time to any other person information obtained in a polling unit as to the candidate to whom a voter is about to vote or has voted for”.
Section 148 provides that “no person who has voted in any election under this Act shall, in any legal proceedings arising out of the election, be required to say for whom he voted”
Dr. Garuba also identified what he termed “the challenge of the ritual of electoral litigation”.
He noted that though INEC has advised the aggrieved to approach the tribunal, and the APC having also given notice, in its petition to recourse to legal action, there exists the challenge of securing victory at the tribunal.
“The extant electoral Act gives just 180 days, which is always inadequate for the petitioners.
“This fact became evident during the post 2011election regime where most tribunals denied petitioners the right to fair hearing on the ground that time allocated for the hearing of election petition has lapsed.
“Most respondents capitalise on this to deploy all time wasting tactics to frustrate the proceedings of the tribunals.’’
On why those involved in electoral malpractice are not prosecuted, another lawyer, Nwanchukwu Obinwa, argued it was yet impossible to successfully prosecute electoral offenders because measures are not yet in place to deter intending electoral offenders as there are no records of anyone convicted and imprisoned for committing electoral offences.
He said although INEC’s Chairman, Prof Attahiru Jega was quoted as admitting that some of his men were responsible for the Anambra show of shame, he refrained from naming them.
“ Jega was also recently quoted to have complained that his commission lacked the financial wherewithal to prosecute electoral offendee
“As it stands today, it may be difficult to ensure successful prosecution of violators of the Electoral Act or election offenders with the failure of President Jonathan to inaugurate an Electoral Offence Commission (EOC) as he had promised after the 2011 elections.
“The blame for the non-establishment of EOC can be shared by the INEC and the National Assembly who have failed to move fast and finalise the promulgation of the Electoral Offences Commission Act to deal with the arrest and prosecution of electoral offenders,” he said.
The President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA),
Okey Wali (SAN), at the association’s NEC meeting
in Nasarawa State, said an EOC “will be in a better position to deal with the challenges posed to our electoral process by the brazen commission of electoral offences in our electoral process”.
Critics said although a few people have benefited and continue to benefit from the warped electoral process in place, the entire nation, unfortunately, is the end loser.
This is because it has not only affected the production of true leaders, the current electoral process under INEC has helped to further stunt the nation’s growth.
How the nation reverses its current unenviable electoral fortune may well be found in the views of three eminent jurists – former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Mohammed Uwais, the incumbent CJN, Justice Aloma Mukhtar and the Administrator, National Judicial Institute (NJI), Justice Umaru Eri.
At an event in Abuja last week, they stressed the need for the country to get its electoral process right.
Justice Uwais said the country’s inability to achieve a rancour free electoral process was capable of serving as a good excuse for foreign capital flight and a disincentive to foreign investment.
He suggested that rather than encouraging the culture of a do-or-die election and its attendant post election litigation, everyone including the political parties, politicians, media, youths, women and the civil society must collaborate to ensure electoral peace.
He said the context and nature of violence defining elections in most parts of Africa was simply beyond what could be addressed by the Electoral Commission only.
Justice Uwais added: “elections are not only expected to allow for political competition and participation, but more importantly, permit peaceful change of power. Therefore, when elections become defined by violence, it is not a good sign. It is bad for the legitimacy of governance.
“It is a good excuse for foreign capital flight and a disincentive to foreign investment. Perhaps, more importantly, it is a sad commentary or dent on the political class and its cultural understanding of power.”
Justice Mukhtar underscored the importance of free and fair elections in every democracy and contended that democratic elections require more than transparency and accurately counting ballot papers on Election Day.
She noted that free and fair elections are the cornerstone of every democracy and the primary mechanism for the people to exercise their franchise.
Justice Mukhtar was of the opinion that the practice of democracy requires the establishment of effective and functional democratic institutions.
These, she said, include “an independent judiciary, a vibrant legislature, law abiding Executive, independent electoral umpire and honest political parties. Other institutions include efficient security agencies, public spirited civil society organisations.”
Justice Mukhtar, who was represented by Justice Ibrahim Tanko Mohammed, said the successful entrenchment of an efficient and effective electoral dispute resolution mechanism was one of the core components of peaceful and credible elections.
Justice Eri in highlighting how the bench could contribute to the realisation of a dependable electoral process, said it was the responsibility of members of the bench to adjudicate on the validity of an election.
“The Judge must ensure that justice is done. He must give effective remedy to the person whose rights and freedom have been breached. We must sustain confidence in the judicial system.
“The system must ensure that people, especially aggrieved parties, are assured that electoral tribunals are independent and that they determine petitions based on factual evidence and sound legal principles.”
They spoke at the opening of a stakeholders meeting on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), facilitated by the NJI, with the theme: “Towards zero violence in African elections: The bar, the bench and the civil society as drivers of peace.”
-

Anambra poll: INEC declares Obiano winner
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Sunday declared Chief Willie Obiano of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) winner of the governorship election in Anambra State.
This followed the completion of the supplementary election in the state on Saturday in areas where it did not hold on November 16.
Declaring the result, the Chief Returning Officer, Prof. James Epoke, said the APGA candidate scored 180,178 votes to win the election.
He said Mr. Tony Nwonye of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and Sen. Chris Ngige of the All Progressives Congress (APC) scored 97,700 and 95,963 votes to emerge second and third respectively.
Mr. Ifeanyi Ubah of the Labour Party came forth with 37,495 votes and Chief Godwin Ezeemo, candidate of Progressive Peoples Alliance clinched the fifth position with 5,120 votes.
Results from INEC showed that of the 1,776,167 registered voters in the state, 465,891 people accredited and total vote cast was 442,242.
The results also showed that 16,988 votes were voided and valid votes were 425,254.
“To declare a winner, the candidate must score 25 per cent vote in two-third of local government; having satisfied this condition, Chief Willie Obiano is now returned winner, ” the News Agency of Nigeria quoted the Chief returning officer as saying on Sunday morning.
-
Supplementary election: Voting ends in Idemili LG
Voting has ended in many polling stations in Saturday’s supplementary governorship elections in Anambra.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that at Iffite Agbaja, Idemili North Local Government Area, the process ended at 1.30 p.m. at units 022 with 18 registered voters, and 023 with 24 voters while only 15 and 20 persons cast their votes respectively.
One of the accredited voters who could not vote, Dr Edozie Aroh, protested against the conclusion of the exercise before 4 p.m.
He said that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) could order voting to stop because the guidelines stipulated that it was only when the last accredited voter had voted.
“I came out early enough for accreditation and by 1.30 p.m. I am not able to vote.
“If accreditation had to last between 8 a.m. and 12 p.m., why should voting end by 4 p.m. “, he asked.
In Amansea, Awka North Local Government Area, votes were counted at Okukwa Hall 04 and Ugbene unit 012.
Security operatives were busy maintaining the peace in the areas. (NAN)
-
Anambra: Apathy trails supplementary election in Onitsha
Voters apathy on Saturday trailed the on-going Anambra supplementary election in some parts of Onitsha metropolis, the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports.
A NAN correspondent who monitored the exercise in polling units in Ward 6 in Onitsha South Local Government Area and a polling unit in Ward 9 in Onitsha North, reported that INEC was fully prepared for the exercise.
It was gathered that election materials and INEC personnel arrived at the various polling booths as early as 7 a.m. while sensitive electoral materials were also on ground with the electoral officers.
However, the electorate were not forthcoming as expected as most residents had decided to go to their daily businesses.
There was high number of security personnel at each polling booth, which in some cases, out-numbered the voters who turned out.
Mr Chidi Okereke, a resident of Zik Avenue in Fegge, told NAN that the materials, INEC main and ad hoc staff, as well as security agencies were in place as early as 7a.m.
Okereke, who is a member of Fegge Community Police Public Relations Committee, said that mass movement of residents out of Fegge hindered the the conduct of the polls.
“Although, you cannot blame the people because having sacrificed some days for the election, they did not see reasons for the cancellation (postponement) of the result in the first place,’’ he said.
Mr Ndubuisi Nwokabia, a worker at the National Orientation Agency (NOA) in Onitsha South area, told said that the residents were looking at the supplementary election as disturbance now “since at the first day the turn-out was very very high’’.
“This is one of the areas in Anambra State where people turn-out en mass to vote during election but this today’s development is unlike this area,’’ Nwokabia, who is a Chief Orientation and Mobilisation Officer in NOA, said.
He said that the number of security-men on ground was okay,.
“Honestly there is no amount of money spent on security that is ever a waste.’’
“I want to believe that it is based on information available to security chiefs that made them bring this number of security men, especially to check activities of some dissidents in this area that can pull surprises,’’ he said.
Prince Edward Okosi, Chairman of Onitsha North Caretaker Committee, told NAN at the polling booth 4 in Ward 9, that he believed that more people would see the need to turn out for the election.
“The leaders of thought in the neighbourhood had gone ahead to create the awareness about the exercise among their people,’’ Okosi said. (NAN)
