Tag: Ariwoola

  • Ariwoola and his indelible footprints

    Ariwoola and his indelible footprints

    • By Lateef Fagbemi (PIX)

    A cursory surfing of the internet harvests and produces comprehensive biographical details about our Celebrant of today, the 17th indigenous Chief Justice of Nigeria, Honourable Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, GCON. One should not be surprised about the avalanche of information available on the web about my noble Lord because our exiting CJN himself is always at home with the internet as he is Information Communication Technology savvy. I attest to the fact that My Lord is an internet prodigy and a guru.

    My Lords, Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen; my Lord, the Hon. Justice Kayode Ariwoola is an embodiment of humility, hope, steadfastness, and determination, who by divine providence worked through the rungs of the judiciary up to the peak as Chief Justice of Nigeria.

    From his humble beginning as a young school teacher in Iseyin, Oyo State, to now retiring as the leader of the Bench in Nigeria, aptly mirrors the essence of hope and unwavering aspiration to ascend to greater heights in life. As an indigene of the Pacesetter State, Oyo, it is noteworthy that my Lord is the first graduate of the Obafemi Awolowo University from Oyo State to be appointed to the Court of Appeal.

    My Lord Ariwoola started his educational career in his home town, Iseyin at the Local Authority Demonstration School, Oluwole in Iseyin Local Government of Oyo State between 1959 and 1967. He was in the Muslim Modern School in the same town between 1968 and 1969 before proceeding to Ansar-ud-Deen High School, Saki in Oyo North of Oyo State. His Lordship studied law at the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University), Ile Ife and bagged his Bachelor of Laws degree with honours in July 1980. In July 1981, Olu Ariwoola was called to the Nigerian Bar and got enrolled at the Supreme Court of Nigeria as a Solicitor and Advocate soon thereafter.

    His Lordship was a State Counsel on National Youth Service (NYSC) at the Ministry of Justice, Akure, Ondo State and later as Legal Officer in the Ministry of Justice of his home state Oyo  until 1988 when he voluntarily left the official bar of the State Civil Service for private practice. His Lordship briefly worked as Counsel in-Chambers of Chief Ladosu Ladapo, SAN between October, 1988 and July 1989, after which he established Olukayode Ariwoola & Co – a firm of legal practitioners and consultants in Oyo town in August 1989 from where he was appointed in November 1992 as a judge of Oyo State Judiciary. Hon. Justice Ariwoola was born to the Ariwoola family of Iseyin at exactly 70 years ago today. His Lordship must have something to do, in a way, with figure two (2). While His Lordship was born on the 22nd August, he was sworn in as a Judge of the High Court on 2nd November, 1992, as a Justice of the Court of Appeal (JCA) on 22nd November, 2005 and again was sworn in as Justice of the Supreme Court of Nigeria (JSC) on 22nd November, 2011. Justice Ariwoola served as Chairman, Board of Directors, Phonex Motors Ltd – one of Oodua Investment conglomerates between 1988 and 1992. He also served as the Chairman, Armed Robbery and Fire-arms Tribunal in Oyo State between May 1993 and September 1996 when he was posted out of the headquarters, Ibadan to Saki High Court. His Lordship served on the election tribunals in Zamfara and Enugu states in 1999 and on Election Appeal Courts in Port-Harcourt, Enugu, Benin, Yola and Ilorin at various times.

    Read Also: Tinubu seeks to boost Nigerian economy with September China visit

    Before his elevation to the Supreme Court, his Lordship served as Justice of the Court of Appeal in Kaduna, Enugu and Lagos divisions. My Lord is also a fellow of the International Dispute Resolution Institute (FIDRI) having been inducted in Dubai, UAE in 2014. His Lordship has attended many national and international conferences and workshops in France, Atlanta Georgia, United Kingdom and Dubai, UAE. My Lord Ariwoola is happily married with children and he loves reading, listening to good music, photography and shopping.

     I am a very proud member of Ibadan bar and also a Patron of that great branch of the Nigerian Bar Association which unarguably is the first organised Bar in Nigeria, hence it is the real Premier Bar in Nigeria. As a rookie lawyer, I cut my very good and sharp teeth in the law firm of that great and renowned Avatar, Colossus and legal icon, now turned Educationist of repute, Chief Emmanuel Afe Babalola, CON, OFR, SAN, FNIALS, D. Litts etc. The prestigious and illustrious law firm is no other than Afe Babalola & Co., Emmanuel Chambers situate at No. 80, Adekunle Fajuyi Road, Adamasingba, Ibadan. The law firm is reputed for producing several great jurists and Senior Advocates of Nigeria.

    Lest I be accused of too much deference to the Afe Babalola Chambers, it goes without saying that in those good old days, Ibadan bar boasted of legal giants in the moulds of Chief Richard Akinjide, SAN; Chief Folake Solanke (Alabukun Chambers), Chief Olisa Chukwura, SAN; Chief Bamidele Aiku, SAN; and Chief Oladosu Ladapo, SAN, amongst many others, who all sharpened our legal teeth in these remarkable years. It was during my formative years at Ibadan bar that my path and that of our retiring CJN first crossed each other. Without being immodest, all lawyers and jurists of note must have had professional interactions and engagements with lawyers in Emmanuel Chambers either as “Appearing with me Counsel” or as  Opposing Counsel in litigations or as a judex in matters which we have been privileged to offer our cutting edge professional legal services to our diverse clients all over the country, and it was in the course of some of those vast nomadic legal practice that I met My Lord., the CJN who was a diligent  State Counsel in the Ministry of Justice, Oyo State.

    Our engagements in court became more frequent shortly afterwards when he left the services of the state to join us in the private legal practice when he set up his law firm known as Olukayode Ariwoola & Co., (Mako Allah Chambers) situate at No.1, Iseyin Road, Owode, Oyo town in Oyo State. It is pertinent for me to add that the CJN then took over that chamber which hitherto belonged to his kinsman, Mr. S. L. Popoola, upon the latter’s appointment as a Judge of Oyo State High Court in February 1982. As a private legal practitioner, my Lord was very ubiquitous in all the courts of various jurisdictions, including the Supreme Court.

    My noble Lord’s erudity and versatility in courts including his comportment, carriage and integrity did not go unnoticed by the judges of the Oyo State High Court at that material time and also the senior members of the bar who promptly recommended him for preferment as a Judge of the Oyo State High Court on 2nd November, 1992 alongside with five others namely:

    •Hon. Justice Kareem Jimoh, appointed from the old Rivers State Ministry of Justice where he was then the Solicitor-General and Permanent Secretary and who was from Ibadan zone of Oyo State;

    •Hon. Justice I. O. Olakanmi, then the Solicitor-General and Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Justice of Oyo State who later rose to become the Chief Judge of Oyo State, also from Ibadan zone of the State;

    •Hon. Justice Afolabi Adeniran of Ogbomoso zone of Oyo State but who was a successful private legal practitioner in Yaba, Lagos State and who later rose to become the Acting Chief Judge of Oyo State;

    •Hon. Justice Lambe Olajire Arasi also of Ibadan zone who was also appointed from a very busy and successful private legal practice in Ibadan, Oyo State;

    •Hon. Justice John Olagoke Ige, another very successful private legal practitioner in Lagos who hailed from Igbo-Ora in Ibarapa zone of Oyo State. Hon. Justice J. O. Ige also rose to become the Acting Chief Judge of Oyo State; and

    •The last but not the least, but the youngest of the six  being my Lord, Honourable Justice Olukayode Ariwoola also a private legal practitioner based in Oyo town, Oyo State, but who hails from Iseyin in Oke-Ogun zone of Oyo State.

    Their appointment was made when the judiciary of Oyo State was under the leadership of Honourable Justice Timothy Adebayo Adeniran Ayorinde as the Chief Judge of Oyo State.

    My Lord’s pronouncements and interventions on the bench are variously contained in several landmark judgments delivered by His Lordship during his very purposeful and highly impactful sojourns on the benches of our High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, most of which are permanently recorded in our various law reports for posterity. No doubt, my Lord’s indelible footprints are very noticeable and manifestly seen in his contributions to the growth and the development of our jurisprudence and constitutionalism. These decisions are too numerous to mention here and, in any event, I prefer to leave that brief to the biography as I am aware that most of the judgments are already chronicled in various books in honour of my Lord, the Honourable Chief Justice of Nigeria.

     My Lord, the CJN is a workaholic and a very outstanding jurist, but not many are aware that My Lord is also a great community person and has great communal value that is second to none. My Lord was once prevailed upon by his people of Iseyin to leave his private legal practice, temporarily, to represent their federal constituency in the Federal House of Representatives at Abuja during the military President Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida political adventures. My Lord politely declined the offer and remained focused on his legal career.

    Permit me to use this occasion to state that the Present Bola Ahmed Tinubu led government is irrevocably committed to massively change the course of narratives within our country’s justice sector. Nigeria’s justice sector shall continue to witness several massive turn-arounds, initiatives and projects that would restore, transform and reposition our justice sector and place it as the best in the global legal community. As a government, we shall eradicate all forms of obstacles militating against the modernisation, effectiveness and efficiency of that critical sector. Recently, the President has assented to the Act which granted upward review of the salaries and allowances of the country’s judicial officers by 300% which we strongly believe would enhance and promote not only the independence of judiciary but will also properly place and position our judiciary as the true and real last hope of the common man and indeed a renewed hope for all and sundry to get from our various courts not only judgements well delivered but justice in action. The Federal Government under the able leadership of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is very much aware and conscious of the present hardships in our country and the hard times that all the citizens of the country are presently undergoing. The government appreciates the resilience of all Nigerians and appeals to our people to kindly bear with the government and be assured that the ongoing hardships are very temporary and will soon give ways to era of prosperity and real growth and developments in Nigeria. The government has put several measures and economic policies in place that would soon mature and transform our country into one of the top economies of the globe.

     For my Lord, the Hon. Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, today marks the end of a most memorable and impactful judicial career, which spanned a period of 32 years, from when he was first appointed a High Court Judge of Oyo State in November, 1992. Indeed, His Lordship came, saw and conquered (veni, vidi, vici). He has made his mark and left indelible imprints in the annals of the Nigerian judiciary and the legal profession in general. I must remark that the outgoing Chief Justice of Nigeria is a stabilising factor who mounted the saddle at a challenging moment for the apex court and he has creditably sustained the sanctity of this hallowed court both as a court of policy, final arbiter and regulator of the justice sector.

    As His Lordship takes a well-deserved bow today, permit me to specially appreciate him for providing leadership, guidance and his firm commitment to improving the wellbeing of the judiciary, which he contributed to immensely.

     This has culminated in the harmonisation of retirement age of 70 years for judicial officers, attainment of a full complement of 21 justices for the Supreme Court, and the enactment of the Judicial Office Holders (Salaries, Allowances, Etc) Act, 2024 which was recently assented to by H.E. President Bola Tinubu, GCFR in order to usher in a 300% increase in the remuneration of our noble lordships. The foregoing signposts the commitment of the present administration to promoting the independence and capacity of the judiciary and advancing judicial reforms.

    The government is also working on other reforms in terms of policies and constitutional amendments to increase access to justice, transparent appointment process, ensure speedy adjudication of cases, increase public confidence in the judiciary, insulate the judiciary from undue interference, etc. I must note that some of these reform initiatives are part of the resolutions reached at the end of the National Justice Summit held in April 2024, which enjoyed the strong support of Hon. Justice Olukayode Ariwoola.  Indeed, the President is committed to a radical transformation of the judiciary in line with rule of law and administration of justice components of the administration’s roadmap for national development.

    The government of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu shall at all times protect and promote the rights of all Nigerians and shall not tolerate any infraction and or breach of same by any person(s) and agencies under any guise whatsoever except as provided by the country’s constitution.

    It is also pertinent to state that constitutional democracy and governance has laid out its peculiar features and attributes. I must restate that elective and legitimate governments entrusted with the mandates of the people can only be changed constitutionally and legally by the electorate at the end of its term of office as prescribed by our laws and the Constitution of the country which is the groundnorm.

     Any other mode or means of attempting to change a democratically elected government except as provided by our laws and the constitution is nothing but a clear case of treason and subversion of democratic governance. The laws of our land as well as the constitution have made copious provisions for dealing with same and bringing the full weight of the laws on such treasonable felons.

    Our Government commends and remains grateful to our apex court in the land, the Supreme Court of Nigeria for living up to its status as both a court of justice and as a policy court in their landmark judgement that emancipated, liberated and set free our local government system in Nigeria from the claws, tyranny and  oppression of those who had held them by the jugulars over the years which has led to almost total stagnation and absence of development and governance in our 774 local governments all over the country.

     We are not unaware of the threats and noises of reprisal by some (not all) of the principalities affected by that epic and locus classicus judgement of the Supreme Court who are threatening fire and brimstone in a matter that has been settled and laid to rest finally by our apex court. The point must be made that their action in this regard amounts to hoovering round the precinct of contempt of court. I urge the Attorneys-General of the affected states to educate and offer sound legal advice, even though very trite and too elementary, to their principals that there can be no appeal against the decision of the Supreme Court.

     They should therefore abide by the principles and the doctrines of the rule of law which is the bedrock of Constitutional democracy. We have no doubt or illusion that our country shall now witness a new dawn and era of purposeful governance across all our 774 local governments. We urge and appeal to all citizens of this country, professional bodies and associations to be alert and watchful of how the local government are utilizing their allocations for growth and development. Our law enforcement agencies too must also monitor all governments and bring the full weight of the laws to bear on any erring government, ministries, departments and or agencies in confirmed cases of misappropriation and or embezzlement, particularly for those who don’t have immunities under the constitution like our democratically elected local government executives, officers and personnel.

    I must attest to the fact that my Lord, the CJN, dispensed justice authoritatively and in his role as the Chief Justice of Nigeria, he discharged his duties passionately in Court and to the Country. He also fostered good relationship among the Bench and strived to protect the integrity and image of the Court. He insulated it from politics and reinvented the image of the courts as the last hope of the common man. The relationship between the Bar and the Bench was very cordial during his tenure. His two-year leadership at the nation’s apex court will be forever remembered.

    My Lords, Distinguished guests, it is obvious that my Lord is a highly accomplished jurist and held a distinguished career in the Nigerian judiciary. Inevitably, the time has come for my Lord to draw the curtain on his decades of meritorious service to the country, not because he is weak by any measure, but because of constitutional requirements. My Lord is merely stepping into the background from where he will have the responsibility of mentoring, advising, and shaping the younger ones. Therefore, we should not be sad that he is retiring because we shall now begin to enjoy another phase of his leadership and fatherly role.

    My Lord, I know you are eager to retire to your lovely family and away from public life, but I want to plead with you to be available to us. The judiciary, in particular, and the country at large will continue to reach out to you to tap into your deep wisdom and wealth of experience.

    At this juncture, I want to extend my gratitude to the family of my Lord. My Lord is not just an accomplished judiciary icon, he is also an accomplished family man and a father-figure to many. He is happily married to his lovely wife, Mrs. Ariwoola, and their marriage is blessed with children. They have endured the burden that comes with the arduous demands of judicial service. They have sacrificed their needs to allow my Lord to effectively discharge his duties as a jurist for over three decades. The intermittent late nights, absences, inconvenience that comes with postings and the requirements of the job; they have endured all, and for that we celebrate your love and sacrifices.

    My Lord, this is a day of celebration. We have gathered here not to say goodbye, but to celebrate you and the lofty goals and achievements you have accomplished. We are here to celebrate your dedication to public service and your immense contribution to nation-building. We are proud of you. The country is proud of you and is indebted to you. You have left indelible marks in the sands of time. Your legacy is eternal and remains a model for our jurists and legal practitioners. We are not happy leaving you to retirement, but I must say that I am personally pained that the bench is going to miss the wisdom and erudition of my Lord, Justice Ariwoola, CJN, but we are nonetheless consoled that he is handing over the baton to a worthy successor, the Ag. CJN, her Lordship, Justice Kudirat Motonmori Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun, CFR who incidentally, was the classmate of My Lord, Justice Ariwoola

    •Attorney-General and Minister of Justice Prince Lateef Fagbemi delivered this speech at the Special Valedictory Session of the Supreme Court to mark the retirement of Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Olukayode Ariwoola in Abuja.

  • I never planned to be a judge, says Ariwoola

    I never planned to be a judge, says Ariwoola

    On August 22, Olukayode Tajudeen Ariwoola retired as the 22nd Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN). During a valedictory court section organised in his honour, he told the story of his life, highlighting key milestones. He also suggested ways to enhance justice delivery. Assistant Editor ERIC IKHILAE was there.

    The beginning

    In the ancient Yoruba kingdom, in fact, in most parts of Africa, before literacy was introduced, one way of marking a significant date was to tie it with a momentous event that occurred around the same time. I was born the same year the Lyttleton Constitution of 1954 was promulgated. It was that Constitution that established the Federal Supreme Court of Nigeria — the same institution which has pleased Almighty Allah for me to head. The Supreme Court is, therefore, more than a Court to me. The Supreme Court is my ‘birth mate.’ The court is 70 years old this year, the same as my humble self. I was, therefore, born in the year of the Supreme Court. What I am not certain of is whether when I was born in Iseyin (Oyo State), my parents – Alhaji Shittu Ariwoola (Mako Allah, Baba Elepo L’ Ebedi) and my mother, Alhaja Misitura Ayoade Ariwoola (Iya Alaso) – ever knew that their new-born baby would have anything to do with the important Court that was established in Lagos that year. Therefore, I look back today with a heart full of gratitude. As an elementary pupil in Local Authority Demonstration School, Oluwole, Iseyin, headed by Chief (Mrs.) Oke, one regular assignment we were usually given in English Language lessons was to be asked to write about ‘A Day You Will Never Forget in Your Life.’ If I were to be given the same assignment today, today, 22nd August 2024, would certainly be the winner.

    My early days at school

    Today is the culmination of an academic and professional career that started, as I have mentioned earlier, at LA Demonstration School in 1960 – the year Nigeria gained independence.  That was the school where my educational foundation was laid. It was in that school that I learnt one of the most important lessons of my life – the habit of punctuality. As fate would have it, in all the three institutions I attended prior to the university, I was appointed or elected the Time-Keeper or the Bell Prefect.

    How I came about the walking stick

    Punctuality was, however, not the only thing I took away from my elementary school. Today, I will reveal the secret of my walking stick to you, which is another manifestation of the grace of God in my life. It was in primary school that I learnt to ride a bicycle. One day, during the Sallah festival, I was asked to deliver meat to a family. I rode a bicycle for the errand. I had delivered the message and was on my way back home when I had an accident on the bike. Like a stone shot from a catapult, I flew off the bicycle and landed on the ground. For many months, I was hospitalised at Baptist Hospital in Saki on account of a broken femur. The white doctors, at a point, even considered amputation of the leg. To the glory of God, I walked out of the hospital on my two legs, though on crutches. Notwithstanding that I was in hospital for months, I did not miss any academic sessions. I went to write my examination from the hospital bed. I graduated with my classmates.  However, the pain in my leg came back in 1970 when I was already in Ansar Ud Deen High School, Saki. I was soon back in the same Baptist Hospital where Dr. Fatula – an Ekiti man – performed the miracle that healed the leg.

    Why I studied Law

    As it happened, my father had a lawyer who was representing him in a litigation he was involved with. The lawyer was dashing, smart, and brilliant. Mr. Stephen Laoye Popoola of counsel was always smartly dressed, and his spoken English was impeccable. He had this infectious confidence around him. Instantly, I knew I wanted to be like him. When I was in Form II, my father asked me what I wanted to study at the university, my answer was straightforward – Law. The journey to study Law was, however, not that straightforward. There was a detour to Obokun Advanced Studies Centre, Ilesa, where I spent two years preparing for my HSC (Higher School Certificate) before finally getting to my destination – the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University), Ile-Ife, Osun State.

    My days at the University of Ife

    At Ife, I was trained by a world-class Faculty, including the renowned Prof. David Ijalaye – the first Professor Emeritus in Law; Prof. Itse Sagay, Prof. Gabriel Olawoyin, and Prof. Oretuyi, amongst others. My LL.B Degree was not the only thing I left the University of Ife with. In Ife, I was blessed to make lifelong friends with great individuals who have all reached the pinnacle of their careers. These worthy classmates and friends include Chief Felix Fagbohungbe, Pastor Femi Atoyebi, Chief Babajide Koku, and Chief Mike Ozekhome, all of whom are Senior Advocates of Nigeria. The late Chief Bisi Egbeyemi, the former Deputy Governor of Ekiti State, was also in my class, as well as Prince S. K. Lawal, and the late Blessing Avwenaghagha, who prosecuted the notorious armed robber, Lawrence Anini.

    My Law School experience

    The Nigeria Law School was another veritable platform for me to make lifelong friends and colleagues from all over Nigeria. At this point, I must thank Allah for the Class of 1981 of the Nigerian Law School. The Class has indeed been blessed. Seven members of the class made it to the Supreme Court as Honourable Justices of the apex court. The Class has produced two Chief Justices of Nigeria, and in the next few hours, Insha Allah, the Class would have produced the third Chief Justice of Nigeria.

    Beginning of my Law career

    One thing I am fond of telling young lawyers is that they must not joke or play with their Youth Service year. It is the formative period when their foundation in the legal profession is laid.  In this regard, I am indebted to Chief Joseph K. Aderibigbe, the then Attorney-General of the Old Ondo State, and all the counsel in the Ondo State Ministry of Justice, Akure. They sharpened my legal teeth as a pupil State Counsel when I served in the Ministry as a Youth Corps member. I recall that I traversed the whole of Ondo State between 1981 and 1982, appearing in almost all the nine judicial divisions of the state at the time. Our seniors in the Ministry at the time included Senator Anthony Adeniyi (SAN) and Justice Bisi Omoleye, (JCA).

    I never planned to be a judge

    It was never in my career plan that I would ever sit on the Bench. That was never my plan. If it had been my plan, I would have stayed back as State Counsel in the Oyo State Ministry of Justice, and hoped to rise through the ranks to become the Solicitor-General and from there to the Bench.

    Read Also: Edun addresses flooding impact on agriculture

    My private practice years

    It was the need to make it in private practice that led to my resignation from the Ministry in 1988, to join the law firm of Ladosu Ladapo & Co. It was the same hunger to reach the peak of practice, as a Senior Advocate, that compelled me to set up my chambers, Olukayode Ariwoola & Co (Mako Allah Chambers) in Oyo town. Till tomorrow, many people still wonder why I decided to set up my chambers in Oyo town and not Ibadan, where I was already known. Oyo was, however, part of the grand design of Allah for me. It was from that provincial and ancient town that Allah raised my head. Some people believe that one can only make it in the legal profession if one practises in huge cities such as Lagos, Abuja, Ibadan, Onitsha, Kano or Port-Harcourt. The reality, however, is that wherever you find yourself, be diligent, be focused, be prayerful, and by God’s grace, the sky is the starting point.

    How I became a judge

    At the time I was nominated to the Bench, becoming a judge was the last thing on my mind. I was even, at my personal costs, moving around Ibadan, pleading with learned seniors to allow themselves to be nominated. Unknown to me, different interest groups had nominated me! I was nominated by the Ibadan Bar, where the late Arakunrin Oluwarotimi Akeredolu (SAN), was the chairman. I was nominated by a group of Honourable Judges before whom I have had the privilege of appearing. The State Governor (of Oyo State), His Excellency Chief Kolapo Ishola, also forwarded my name for consideration. I am eternally grateful to them all. With all these nominations raining down, one would have assumed that my appointment would be hitch-free. Not at all. It got to a point where the Chief Registrar, who was worried that my name was removed from the list, requested me to contact people who could be of influence to assist me. My response was, however, to the effect that: ‘He who prays and supplicates to God, must not supplicate to other beings. If God Almighty has an errand to send in the Judiciary, He would facilitate the appointment.’ I was number nine on the list of the nine names that were finally recommended to the Governor for approval. But there were only six vacancies. In other words, I was the last in order of recommendation. The first five were approved by the Governor. The number six was skipped. The number seven was skipped. The number eight was skipped. The executive red pen hovered above number nine and stopped. The number nine was approved as number six. Olukayode Ariwoola was the number nine, who became the number six. On 2nd November, 1992, I was sworn in as a judge of the High Court of Oyo State. Of the six of us sworn in together, I was the youngest in age and in post-qualification experience. Justice A. Adeniran and Justice L. O. Arasi were enrolled on 26th July, 1970. Justice J. O. Ige was enrolled on 17th July, 1972. Justice I. O. Olakanmi was called to the Bar on 26th June, 1973. Justice K. A. Jimoh was called to the Bar on 28th June, 1975. I was, therefore, naturally assigned to the last court in the Judiciary: Court 16. The dashing and brilliant lawyer, who had inspired me to study Law and who had since been elevated to the Bench as Hon. Justice Stephen Laoye Popoola had the fortune of welcoming me to the Bench — precisely 10 years after his own elevation in 1982.

    My elevation to Court of Appeal

    On 22nd November, 2005, I was elevated to the Court of Appeal. By virtue of this appointment, I became the first person from the entire Oke-Ogun to become an appellate Justice – a modest achievement for the whole community.  I was posted to the Kaduna Division of the Court of Appeal as my first station. On the first day, we sat in Kaduna, the three of us on the panel – Justice Abdulkadir Jega, Justice Kudirat Motonmori Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun, and my humble self – realised that we all belonged to the same 1981 Class of Law School. I thank their Lordships and our Presiding Justice, Hon. Justice Baba Alkali Ba’aba, who welcomed me to Kaduna and eased me into the workings of the Appellate Court. I have had cause to refer to the Court of Appeal Justices as ‘Nomadic Justices’ on account of our frequent postings. From Kaduna, I was posted to Enugu. Enugu was not a strange town to me. I had sat there as a member of the Election Petition Tribunal in 1999. Strangely, a week after the conclusion of our assignment in 1999, I learnt that our chambers was bombed by unknown arsonists. From Enugu, my appellate ship berthed in Lagos.

    My journey to the Supreme Court

    It was from the Lagos division (of the Court of Appeal) that I was nominated to the apex court alongside my Lords, Justice Sylvester Ngwuta and Justice Mary Peter-Odili. We were invited to the National Assembly for the constitutional screening. It was at the Senate that history sought to repeat itself when the distinguished parliamentarians decided to ‘adjourn’ my screening. The reason for the adjournment? I was informed that there was an outstanding petition against my nomination. What was I alleged to have done? I was told that I was a member of the Justice Salami-led panel that decided the case of Dr. Olukayode Fayemi v. Olusegun Adebayo Oni. I knew there was no substance to the petition if indeed there was a petition. A favourite proverb of my grandfather, Abdul Salami Ariwoola, was that: ‘he who does not spread cocoa out to dry does not fear rain at all.’ I knew I had no cocoa spread out to dry; therefore, I was not afraid of any rainfall.  Justices Ngwuta and Peter Odili were successfully screened and cleared. I rejoiced with them and congratulated them. They proceeded to the Supreme Court, and I proceeded to Lagos to continue my work at the Court of Appeal. Their two Lordships were both sworn in in June, 2011 as Justices of the Supreme Court. A couple of months later, I was invited back to the National Assembly. This time around, there was no mention of any petition. I was duly screened, and my appointment was confirmed. In the month of November 2011, I was sworn in as a Justice of the Supreme Court. All my three judicial appointments, from the trial court to the penultimate appellate court to the apex court, had taken place in November. I was appointed a judge of the High Court of Oyo State on 2nd November 1992. I was elevated to the Court of Appeal on 22nd November 2005. I was elevated to the Supreme Court on 22nd November 2011 – the anniversary of my elevation to the Court of Appeal. When I was elevated to the apex court, I was number 16. Incidentally, when I was appointed a judge of the High Court years earlier, I was number 16 in the Oyo State High Court.

    How I became CJN

    On 27th June 2022, I was sworn in as the acting Chief Justice of Nigeria, and I was conferred with the National Honour of the Grand Commander of the Order of Niger. Months later, I was sworn in as the substantive Chief Justice of Nigeria. Although the present Supreme Court was constituted in its present form in 1954 as I mentioned above, it was not lost on me that, counting from 1914 the year of amalgamation of the Northern and Southern Protectorates with the Colony of Lagos, I was the 22nd Chief Justice to hold sway in the Supreme Court.

    My days as the CJN

    I came to the office as the Chief Justice of Nigeria at a critical point in the history of both our nation and our judiciary. Our country was in the process of political transition, and our judiciary was in a state of turmoil. The tasks appeared daunting, and the challenges appeared insurmountable. However, with our faith in God and our trust in Him for guidance, our ship was able to successfully navigate the seemingly perilous waves and berthed safely at the harbour of peace. I must pay sincere and heartfelt tributes to my Brother Justices, whom I have been privileged to sit with here. They are true brothers in deed and in fact. It must be realised that a Chief Justice is not the boss or the employer of his brother Justices. He is not. He is only the first among equals.  A Chief Justice must, therefore, not see himself as the Emperor of the Supreme Court. The occupier must work with his colleagues with mutual respect in order to have a successful administration.

    Democratisation of administration

    One of the first things we did, on the assumption of office, was democratising the workings of the court. We created committees of the Justices. We had a Litigation Committee, an Administration Committee, a Welfare Committee, a Finance and Budget Committee, and other committees, all headed by a Justice of the court.  With this in place, I was able to focus on the duty of administering the court. Although this innovative system is not codified, it has been a successful experiment, and I hope other courts will consider it too.

    Promoting the right to fair hearing

    It is my conviction that the right to fair hearing enshrined in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria could only be meaningful when litigants have enough judges and justices to hear their cases. Justice is not a scarce commodity to be queued for. Justice without delay is inherent, natural, and constitutional. In my view, it is antithetical to the concept of justice when litigants are made to wait for years in order to have their cases determined. As a Justice of the Supreme Court, it was always a sobering moment for me whenever an appeal was called to be heard, and a learned counsel stood up to inform us that the appellant or the respondent was late. In effect, the litigant had died without his appeal being determined one way or the other. It was for this reason that I made it a priority that no stone must be left unturned to ensure that we brought more judicial officers into the system. I must express our collective gratitude to the distinguished members of the Federal Judicial Service Council and the National Judicial Council for their commitment to the project of liberalisation of the judiciary. Without their active participation, we could not have pushed the process through. The Legislative Arm of government must also be commended not only for the swift constitutional screening of the nominees where required but also for the budgetary approval required to fund the appointment. The Executive Arm deserves commendation for the political will to see the project to the end. In this regard, we have all succeeded in demonstrating the practical working of the constitutional principle of Separation of Powers. The three arms of government are separate but not disparate. We are independent but not in isolation. We cooperate, but we do not compromise. This, in my view, is the true essence of separation of powers. The Supreme Court was not the only court that benefitted from the appointment of new Justices. The Bench of the Court of Appeal also had its ranks swelled by the appointment of two sets of new Justices in 2023 and 2024. With respect to the trial courts, that is, the Federal High Court, the National Industrial Court, the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, and the High Court of the states, they all experienced the injection of new judges. This will go a long way in facilitating the speedy dispensation of justice.

    Welfare improvement

    One area where we have also attempted to make a difference is in the aspect of the welfare of judicial officers – both serving and retired. A judicial officer’s work is not from 9am to 5pm. The reality of our existence is that a judge’s job is a 24-hour job. He sits in the court from 9am to about 3pm, if not later. When others close for the day, a Justice resumes his afternoon shift. That is when he begins to prepare his judgments and rulings. When others are resting at home after dinner, he commences his night shift by reading his files for the next day. There is no Judex worth his salt that will not read his files before getting to the court. For the past 32 years, I have always had one judgment or ruling pending for me to write. I cannot recall a single time in the last three decades when there was no judgment for me to write. It is for this reason that I believe that the emoluments of judicial officers must not be sweated for in or outside the office. Our judges must not be made to go cap in hand to beg before their remuneration is paid. Our retired justices deserve to live in relative reasonable comfort after spending their prime years serving the country. This is more so that they are constitutionally precluded from going back to active practice as barristers after leaving office. If truth must be told, the welfare of the judiciary is the welfare of the country. I am glad that we have made appreciable progress in this regard with the passage of the Bill for an Act to Prescribe the Salaries, Allowances and Fringe Benefits of Judicial Office Holders in Nigeria and for Related Matters by the National Assembly.

    Judicial Assistant Scheme

    One peculiar feature of the work of a judicial officer is that its performance is not delegable. It is not an assignment that can be done by proxy. A brother judge cannot prepare your judgment for you. He cannot conduct your trial for you. He cannot assess your witness for you. It is thus a back-breaking profession. We thus instituted the idea of Judicial Assistant to provide relief for Justices in the area of research and documentation. This crop of staff will aid the work of their Lordships by conducting research for them. It is hoped that the scheme will be a permanent feature of our justice system at all levels.

    New Supreme Court Rules

    When I became the Chief Justice of Nigeria, I was concerned about the fact that the rules regulating procedures in the apex court were those made 39 years ago. Although Practice Directions have been issued at regular intervals over the years to meet demands of justice, the substantive rules were still as made in 1985. l am convinced that the rules of procedure of any court are the engine that drives its operations. It is also my view that the rules must be dynamic and contemporary in order to meet the changing demands of both the Bench and the Bar. At the time the Supreme Court Rules 1985 were made, things that are now ubiquitous like information technology, electronic transactions, and global telecommunications, amongst others, were either not in existence or in their formative infancy. How then could such obsolete rules be adequate for the challenges of today? It was for this reason that I empanelled a Rules Committee to undertake the arduous assignment of reviewing the 39-year-old Rules and the many extant practice directions comprehensively. I am glad to report to you all that earlier this month, pursuant to the provisions of Section 236 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, I signed off on the new Supreme Court Rules 2024. In this regard, I must not fail to commend the wonderful job done by Hon. Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, JSC; Justice Inyang Okoro, JSC; Justice Moronkeji Helen Ogunwumiju, JSC, Dr. Muiz Banire, SAN, and Mr. Yakubu C. Maikyau, SAN. Their dedication and commitment ensured that the new Rules became a reality. I am grateful to them.

    Supreme Court’s ADR option

    The Supreme Court Mediation Centre, which was established during the tenure of My Lord Justice Mahmood Mohammed, CJN, has now become fully operational. It is my conviction that there is more than one route that leads to justice and that the fundamental objective of everyone, who approaches the court is to get justice within a reasonable time. The Centre is empowered to provide alternative dispute resolution services to litigants thereby ensuring that disputes are resolved amicably and without acrimony. More importantly, the Centre will ensure that the docket of the Supreme Court is not clogged with matters that could be settled amicably. It is our hope that counsel and their clients will take advantage of the Centre to ensure that their matters are resolved speedily and harmoniously, without the attendant friction of litigation.

    Need to reduce Supreme Court’s workload

    Access to justice should not be regarded as an uncontrolled and unfiltered liberty to bring all forms of cases to the Supreme Court.  It is my belief that we trivialise the institution of the Supreme Court as a Court of Policy when every form of litigation is able to meander its way to the apex Court. It also diminishes the judicial importance of the Court of Appeal – that very important appellate court – when every one of its decisions must be reviewed by us here. I daresay that if there is another court that is superior to the Supreme Court, many cases will find their way to that Court ad infinitum. Counsel and litigants ought to know when to call it a day. Eleven months ago, Justice Amina Augie – that extremely brilliant and hardworking jurist – In her Valedictory Speech, narrated her surprise that one of the cases that found its way to the Supreme Court was an appeal in respect of 12 goats. Yes, 12 goats were the subject of a matter that came to the apex court. What these types of cases do is to clog the system, thereby depriving other important cases from being heard.

    Need for cooperation between the Bench and the Bar

    The legal profession is made up, in the main, of the Bench and the Bar. As it is inconceivable for a bird to fly with one wing, it is impossible for either the Bench or the Bar to thrive without each other. The success of the profession, and in fact of the justice sector, is anchored on the efficient cooperation and effective collaboration of both the Bench and the Bar. Having been on the Bench for more than three decades, I believe I am in a vantage position to state without any fear of equivocation that Nigeria is blessed with a brilliant and vibrant Bar. Their oral advocacy is top-notch, their written briefs of argument are first-class, and their professional ethics are excellent. It was always a thing of joy for me and my colleagues whenever we listened to the brilliant submissions emanating from the Inner and the Outer Bar. I must therefore thank members of the Nigerian Bar Association for their professionalism. By their industry, they have raised the bar of advocacy. I must also commend members of the Bar for their discipline and decorum. I have been privileged to be a recipient of utmost respect and courtesy from members of the Bar from the time I served as a High Court Judge till date. Throughout my tenure on the Bench, there was never a single instance when a counsel was rude to me or when I was rude to a member of the Bar. During my tenure as the Chief Justice of Nigeria, I worked with two Attorneys General of the Federation: Mr. Abubakar Malami, SAN and Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN. I also worked with one President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Mr. Yakubu Maikyau, SAN. I used the three gentlemen as my point of contact to express my appreciation to the entire members of the Bar for their support over the years.

    Senior lawyers should mentor young ones

    Leaders of the Bar must not abandon their duty of mentoring the younger practitioners, who are just coming to the profession. It is your responsibility to hold their hand during their formative years. This is one of your most important duties. As a fruit does not fall far from the tree, so the younger lawyers are seen as a reflection of their seniors. Of recent, we have started witnessing a fall, not only in the standard of advocacy but also in the manner of the dressing of our younger colleagues. It is important to reiterate the elementary point that it is highly unprofessional for counsel to address the in the second person as ‘you.’ It must always be ‘the court,’ ‘Your Lordship’ or ‘My Lord .’ Respect and decorum between the Bench and the Bar is the foundation of our profession. I will say no more on this issue.

    The sacrifices I made for my career choice

    As a youngster, I was an avid reader. My taste in reading was eclectic. I read every novel I came across. Judicial responsibilities, however, had made me to cut down drastically on reading non-legal works. Now that I am retiring, I intend to commence reading without the pressure of pending judgment or ruling. One of the novels I read long ago was by James Hadley Chase with the title: ‘There is Always a Price Tag.’ I mentioned above the fact that Court of Appeal Justices are nomadic Justices by virtue of our frequent postings. What I did not mention is the fact that some people are always paying the price for our absence. That is our family. I, therefore, pay tribute to the forbearance of my family during the many years of absence. My wife, Chief (Mrs.) Adewumi Ariwoola, Chief Afimo tunorise of Ibadan, is exceptional in this respect. She is what Yoruba people will describe as obinrin bi okunrin (a woman who does the work of a man). From the time I left Ibadan to set up my Chambers in Oyo town, she proved to be a strong pillar of support. When I was posted to Saki division of the Oyo State High Court, she was there for the family like the Rock of Gibraltar. When I was posted to Kaduna, she held the fort like an army general. When I was transferred to Enugu, she was the glue that kept the family together. When posting took me to Lagos, my wife did not allow the children to feel my absence. Like my uncle, Professor Peller, the famous magician, my wife expertly and adroitly juggled the many balls of being a professional in her own right with keeping the home intact. I am eternally in her debt. Thank you, Mummy Permanent Secretary. I also thank my children for keeping the flag of the Ariwoola family flying without stain. They endured my countless absences without complaining. They are the best children any parent would wish for. Another price I have had to pay was with regard to my health. In 2016, I had a Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery as a result of a blocked artery. A vessel had to be removed from my leg and inserted in my chest to serve as a passage for blood. It was a testing time for me and the family but glory be to God, I am today alive to witness this crowning moment of my career. I am grateful to Justice Suleiman Galadima JSC (rtd), who took it upon himself to request the Chief Imam of the Supreme Court Mosque to continue to supplicate for me while the surgery lasted. My friends, Dr. Junaid Ogundiran and Dr. Mashood Sodiq in Ibadan were also engaged in prayers throughout the time I was in the theatre. I am grateful to them all.

  • JUST IN: Ariwoola retires as Chief Justice of Nigeria

    JUST IN: Ariwoola retires as Chief Justice of Nigeria

    Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, the 22nd Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), has officially retired from service upon reaching the mandatory retirement age of 70.

    While delivering his valedictory speech at the Supreme Court complex in Abuja, Ariwoola disclosed that to suit the times and address current challenges, he signed off on the new Supreme Court Rules 2024 earlier this month.

    A valedictory court session was also held in his honour at the Supreme Court complex in Abuja.

    Speaking at the session, Ariwoola disclosed that to suit the times and address current challenges, he signed off on the new Supreme Court Rules 2024 earlier this month.

    He explained that upon assuming office as the CJN two years ago, he was concerned about the rules regulating procedures in the apex court, which had been in place for 39 years, predating the advent of the internet and electronic transactions.

    He noted that although practice directions have been issued periodically over the years to meet the demands of justice, the substantive rules were still from 1985.

    Read Also: UPDATED: NJC recommends Kekere-Ekun to succeed Ariwoola as CJN

    He said: “At the time the Supreme Court Rules 1985 were made, things that are now ubiquitous, like information technology, electronic transactions, and global telecommunication, were either not in existence or in their formative stages. How, then, could such outdated rules be adequate for today’s challenges?

    “It was for this reason that I empanelled a Rules Committee to undertake the arduous task of reviewing the 39-year-old rules and the numerous extant practice directions comprehensively.

    “I am glad to report that earlier this month, pursuant to the provisions of Section 236 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, I signed off on the New Supreme Court Rules 2024.”

    Former President Muhammadu Buhari appointed Ariwoola as acting CJN in June 2022 following the resignation of Justice Tanko Muhammad on health grounds. Ariwoola was subsequently sworn in October of the same year following his confirmation by the Senate.

    Ariwoola was appointed a Justice of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2011. He was a Justice of the Court of Appeal between 2005 and 2011 after having been elevated from the State High Court of Oyo State.

    He studied law at the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University), Ile Ife, and bagged his bachelor of laws degree with honours in July 1980. In July 1981, Ariwoola was called to the Bar and enrolled at the Supreme Court of Nigeria as a Solicitor.

    Ariwoola turned 70 today, August 22, 2024.

  • The Ariwo Symphony

    The Ariwo Symphony

    Unending struggle for federalism in Nigeria

    The enduring impression of the man himself is of somebody perfectly at peace with himself, a man who views the world with the profound equanimity of a natural philosopher. The judge does not submit to, or subject himself to, the raw and raucous emotions of the rowdy masses. Whatever the wailing and caterwauling his ruling might have provoked, the judge must go placidly before the world. He cannot express a personal opinion and neither can he give vent to personal feeling without bringing down the template and the temple itself.

      The wise Yoruba people observe that a person’s destiny is often embedded in the cognomen they bear. (Oruko nroni) By the time he vacated the exalted office of the Chief Justice of the federation last week, Justice Olukayode Ariwoola had given his compatriots enough to chew and ponder on, particularly on the landmark ruling of the Supreme Court on what constitutes the federating units in a federation. But his Lordship would not be disturbed by the noise emanating from the gallery. True to his name, the retired jurist does not believe that the conclave of the wise should be deterred by the howling of the hoi polloi or that the famously rich should be prevented from enjoying the pleasures of their wealth by the impudent masses. (Ariwo loni, ariwo lola. Ariwoola)

        Forever class conscious, the Yoruba aristocracy has a fascinating way of dealing with noisy disturbance by simply ignoring it.  Aficionados of juju music will recall Ebenezer Obey’s classic panegyric for Jimoh Ajani Areago, aka Eji Omo Gbadero. As soon as the lead vocalist began chanting the effusive praise of the famed land speculator, the drummer picked up the scent in arresting concord and complementarity.

        K’ole yewon, rarara k’ole ye won

       Kole ye won bi Gbadero se nlogba

     I ba se’pe o ye won bi Gbadero se nlo’gba

     I ba sepe o ye won bi Gbadero se nlo’gba l’eko oo…..

     Asiri eko koni tu loju ewe

    And then the heavyweight but diminutive drummer, Mutiu Jimoh, weighs in:

     Omo Gbadero, dami dami dami

     Ariwo majesin kii p’alakara

      Dami, dami dami

       The noise of impertinent youth (majesin) does not kill the successful fried bean producer. Anybody who has witnessed how the hordes of rowdy youth often besiege the stall of akara women demanding for priority attention will appreciate what is meant by this. Ariwoola is unmoved by all the noise. A recent encounter with Ariwoola before he vacated office was as intriguing as it was revealing. As the crowd of distinguished guests pulled out of the hall after the last Democracy Day Dinner in Abuja on June 12, yours sincerely was pulled over just outside the hall by a police officer who firmly but politely informed one that his boss demanded our attention. The officer pointed in the direction of the pavement where an elderly fellow sat with a quiet and demure demeanor. He was clad in snow white traditional agbada complimented by snow white beard and moustache. Set against the background of state glamour and the frenzied crowd rushing to nowhere, there was something surreal about the calm composure of the elderly one. As one gingerly held out his hand, one was convinced that it was a case of mistaken identity. But it was not.

    Read Also; Acquiescent National Assembly not helping democracy

       “Ranka dede”, one greeted thinking that the personage was of northern provenance.

       “Ariwoola ni oruko temi”, (My name is Ariwoola) the man calmly responded. Memory and recollection flooded in immediately. It was almost fifty years ago since one left him behind at the university. But there are some people you never forget.

       “Ha!! CJ, CJ!! Great Ife!!! I thought the beard was bigger than this!” one crowed.

       Further pleasantries and the promise of getting in touch, yours sincerely jumped into the waiting bus. A fortnight after Ariwoola’s departure from office and a few weeks after the Supreme Court ruling granting full autonomy and implied right as a federating unit to the local government, the din and uproar emanating from public reaction to the landmark ruling as well as widespread censure at what is considered the lowest ebb of integrity and probity in the history of the nation’s judiciary continue unabated.

    Some sections and fractions of the political class are yet to come to terms with what has hit them. While many believe that the federal authorities are merely gaming the system, leveraging on their power and authority to put opponents of their political suzerainty in their place by further unitarizing what is already a unitarist chokehold on the nation, the teeming supporters of the ruling believe that as the unit closest to the pulse of the people,   autonomy for local government means that the hour of liberation of the people as well as fast-tracked development at the grassroots level is at hand. Furthermore, by removing local government from the apron strings of thieving and authoritarian governors, a way has been found to curb their excesses and to redirect critical resources they have appropriated to the real people who need them.

      Not so fast. Opponents of the ruling countered that this is merely an attempt to demonize government at the sub-national level over the crime of corruption and mismanagement for which the federal authorities are equally culpable. For every governor accused of economic malfeasance, there are at least three federal officials under interdiction. In any case, the local government as an independent federating unit is a constitutional bugaboo not sighted anywhere in the written grundnorm.  Local council is not the same thing as local government. In America, people gather together to form their own association and then apply for funding. It doesn’t make them federating. The only federating units explicitly stated in the constitution are the federal and sub-national authorities. Nothing outside of this framework can be created or imported into it by a body supposed to interpret the constitution. 

      The most forward-looking and progressive-minded among the lot reject the ruling as an authoritarian and reactionary claptrap insisting that when you are in hole, you must stop digging. A nation clamoring  for liberation from the over-centralized unitarist stranglehold imposed by its colonial forebears despite the lip service paid to a truly federalized system on the eve of independence must not be seen loading the dice in favour  of a heavily centralized authority at the national level. Rather, political rationality and the drive towards modernity suggest that concerted efforts must be directed at loosening the vice grip of centralized tyranny which has made it impossible for the creative genius and enterprising spirit of the various people to be set free.

       These conflicting arguments merely reinforce the notion that no federation is ever given in advance. Rather than being given in utopian abstraction, a federation, however it turns out at a particular point in history, is defined and refined in action; in continuous agonistic contention by the political elite and occasionally by direct action by the people.  The outcome of these struggles is often different from what the protagonists and antagonists have in mind. Fresh limbs and arms must be found to continue from where others drop off. 

    Owing to colonial occupation and its postcolonial offshoot, federalism in Nigeria and most colonial nations is always a heavily hybridized product with direct imposition by colonial, military and even civilian authorities being pushed back by the people to make for a more amenable and beneficial outcome. If the current authorities succeed in imposing the “amended” federalism on the nation, it will be a reflection of the subsisting balance of forces and there is not much a visionary federalist can do about that. The wager is that it will not be the last of such amendments if it cripples the aspirations of constituting entities.

       The history of federalism in Nigeria is the history of unitarism handed down in various disguises and masks .Colonel Fredrick Lugard, the colonial progenitor of the new nation, did not have to pretend or dissemble that he was running a military garrison with little or no time for niceties or diplomatic finesse. He did so with exemplary brutality until 1918 when his disdain for the natives led to a mishandling of the Egba revolt against colonial government. At this point, even his patrons in Whitehall had grown tired of the old colonial warrior. He was recalled. A nation cannot be run like a military garrison. At the rate Lugard was going, he would have had to pacify the major nationalities of the new nation several times over before Pax Britannia could be imposed.

       Thereafter, the new country was run very much like a dual-state nation until the run up to independence. This was to prevent political contamination and the contagion of radicalism by southern anarchists who were up to no good. By the time the veil was lifted with the approach of independence, the damage had been done. Protracted alienation led to severe estrangement. Luckily for both colonial masters and their protégés, a new crop of visionary colonial officers came to the rescue based on fresh thinking. On the strength of widely divergent cultures, modes of production and differences of religion, they argued that it may be better and more productive for the three different regions to develop at their own pace and on their own initiative with a central administration serving as remote spur.

       Once this new initiative took hold as the new norm of governance, power was wrested from the traditional rulers and invested in the emergent political class to drive the project of modernity. This new arrangement immediately generated its own tensions and tragicomedy between the Deputy Leader of Action Group, Chief Bode Thomas who was named the boss of the Oyo Local Government and the incumbent Alaafin, Oba Adeyemi.  At the first meeting of the council, the flamboyant and dandified Lagos lawyer was alleged to have ordered the Alaafin to get up for him based on established order of protocol. The traditional ruler was said to have been so miffed by this calculated act of disrespect and rudeness that he was said to have placed a curse on Bode Thomas from which he died two days later. In bitter retaliation, the Action Group was believed to have contrived to get the powerful monarch dethroned and banished from his domain. He died a few years after in a condition of distressing poverty.

    It can be seen from the foregoing that ever since the amalgamation of the two Southern and Northern protectorates in 1914, the struggle for federalism and egalitarian redistribution of power in Nigeria has been marked by continuous strife and upheavals sometimes leaving bloody claw marks all over the protagonists. Sometimes, it ends in lone victory for the visionaries and sometimes in catastrophic defeat and precipitate retreat. The one unfolding before our very eyes will not be different.

    As the Tinubu administration joins the fray, it is important to reframe for the administration some of the costly milestones and important benchmarks in Nigeria’s unending struggle for a just and true federal arrangement. First no civilian government in the history of the nation with the exception of the First Republic has managed to fundamentally alter the structure of the federation. In the First Republic, the Balewa administration not only created the Midwest Region, it also managed to impose a state of emergency on an equally federating unit. Needless to add that both interventions, because they were fundamentally partisan and without much objective merits, ended in tears and the eventual destruction of the Republic. May the good Lord guide the administration in the right direction.

  • CJN: NJC meets this week on Ariwoola’s exit, replacement

    CJN: NJC meets this week on Ariwoola’s exit, replacement

    Barring any unforeseen development, the National Judicial Council (NJC)  will  meet this week on happenings in the Judiciary, particularly the imminent exit of Justice Olukayode Ariwoola as the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN).

    Justice Ariwoola is billed to formally vacate office on August 22    upon attaining a retirement age of 70 years. He became CJN on October 12, 2022.

    The Supreme Court has already scheduled a valedictory court session in his honour.

    The Nation learnt  from an NJC source yesterday that it is mandatory that the NJC meets and decides on who to recommend to the President as acting  CJN pending the appointment of a substantive one.

    Going by Sub-section 4 of Section 231 of the the1999 Constitution the  baton will fall on Justice Kudirat Motonmori Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun (nee Fasinro) who  is currently, the second most senior Justice of the  apex court

    Read Also: Price cut, more trips on Lagos Blue Rail Line

    The sub-section  states that: “If the office of Chief Justice of Nigeria is vacant or if the person holding the office is for any reason unable to perform the functions of the office, then until a person has been appointed to and has assumed the functions of that office, or until the person holding has resumed those functions, the President shall appoint the most senior Justice of the Supreme Court to perform those functions.”

    Sub-section 1 of the same section also  provides that : “The appointment of a person to the office of Chief Justice of Nigeria shall be made by the President on the recommendation of the National Judicial Council subject to confirmation of such appointment by the Senate.”

    The NJC source explained that the meeting next week, ‘’the NJC will formally write to inform the President of   about the impending retirement of the CJN(Ariwola) and the name of the most senior Justice of the apex court, recommended for appointment in acting capacity.” 

    If eventually appointed in a substantive capacity, and all things being equal, the 66-year-old Justice Kekere-Ekun, from Lagos State, will vacate office in 2028.

    She will become Nigeria’s second female CJN, the first being Justice Mariam Aloma Mukhtar who served between July 2012 and November 2014.

    Justice Kekere-Ekun was born on  May 7, 1958, in Britain.

    In 1980, she received a bachelor’s degree in Law from the University of Lagos and was admitted to the Nigeria Bar on 10 July 1981, having graduated from the Nigerian Law School. She thereafter proceeded to the London School of Economics where she received a Master’s degree in Law in November 1983.

    She engaged in private practice from 1985 to 1989 when she was appointed a Senior Magistrate Grade II in the Lagos State Judiciary in December 1989.

    Justice Kekere-Ekun was later appointed a judge of the High Court of Lagos State on July 19, 1996. She served as Chairman of the Robbery and Firearms Tribunal, Zone II, Ikeja, Lagos from November 1996 to May 1999.

    She was subsequently elevated to the Court of Appeal on September 22, 2004 where she served in various divisions of the court.

    Justice Kekere-Ekun was elevated to the Supreme as the 5th female Justice of the Court and was sworn in on July 8, 2013.

  • CJN’s autobiography for presentation August 22

    CJN’s autobiography for presentation August 22

    The autobiography of Chief Justice Olukayode Ariwoola will be presented on August 22, as part of events to mark his 70th birthday and retirement.

    Entitled: Judging with Justice, it is an engaging narrative of Justice Ariwoola’s life and career.

    A statement by Olanrewaju Akinsola, on behalf of the organising committee, said the presentation would be held at the International Conference Centre, Abuja.

    The event, which coincides with the 70th birthday of the foremost jurist and his retirement as Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), will have in attendance members of the Bench, the Bar and other dignitaries.

    Former Head of State Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar is expected at the event.

    Justice Benedict Kanyip will review the book.

    Read Also: Four ships, chopper deployed in sub-regional navies’ maritime operation

    The organisers said the autobiography “is a candid and introspective account of his journey through the ranks of the judiciary, highlighting his experiences, challenges, and triumphs.

    “The book offers a rare glimpse into the mind of a judicial Icon who has played a pivotal role in shaping Nigeria’s judicial landscape,” they added.

    According to Akinsola, the book presentation is a landmark event which promises to be a significant milestone in the nation’s judicial history.

    He said it would offer a unique opportunity for legal practitioners, scholars, and the general public to gain insight into the life and times of one of Nigeria’s most respected jurists.

    Court of Appeal President Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem, in the foreword, writes that the book “is written in Justice Ariwoola’s characteristic flowing prose and simple yet powerful language”.

    She adds the autobiography “will take the reader on a colourful voyage of fascinating adventures starting from Iseyin, to Ile-Ife, to Akure, to Ibadan, to Oyo, to Kaduna, to Enugu, to Lagos, before finally berthing in Abuja like the climax of a blockbuster movie flick.”

  • Assessing Ariwoola’s tenure

    Assessing Ariwoola’s tenure

    In 16 days, Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Olukayode Ariwoola will make his last appearance on the Supreme Court Bench. A valedictory court session has been scheduled for him. Assistant Editor ERIC IKHILAE reviews his tenure.

    His distinctive appearance became a regular feature in public space upon his appointment, first in an acting capacity on June 27, 2022, and later as a substantive CJN on October 12, 2022.

    Justice Olukayode Ariwoola’s well-trimmed signature facial hair always distinguishes him from other members of the apex court’s Bench.

    The man Olukayode Ariwoola

    He was born in Iseyin, Oyo State on August  22, 1954. He started his primary education at the Local Authority Demonstration School, Oluwole in the Iseyin Local Government Area of Oyo State.

    Justice Ariwoola later moved to the Muslim Modern School in the same Iseyin from 1968 to 1969, and subsequently attended the Ansar-Ud-Deen High School, Shaki, Oyo State where he completed his High School.

    He graduated from the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University), Ile Ife, Osun State in July 1980, from where he obtained his Bachelor’s Degree in law (LLB) and was called to the Nigerian Bar and got enrolled at the Supreme Court of Nigeria as a Solicitor and Advocate in July 1981.

    Ariwoola started his career as a State Counsel on the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) at the Ministry of Justice, Akure, Ondo State, and later as a Legal Officer in the Ministry of Justice, Oyo State until 1988 when he voluntarily left the State Civil Service for private practice.

    He had worked as counsel in the chambers of Chief Ladosu Ladapo (SAN) between October 1988 and July 1989 when he established Olukayode Ariwoola & Co – a firm of legal practitioners and consultants in Oyo town in August 1989 from where he was appointed in November 1992 as a Judge of Oyo State Judiciary.

    He was chairman of the Board of Directors, Phonex Motors Ltd – one of Oodua Investment conglomerates between 1988 and 1992, and chairman of the Armed Robbery Tribunal, Oyo State between May 1993 and September 1996 when he was posted out of the headquarters, Ibadan to Saki High Court.

    Ariwoola was elevated to the Court of Appeal in November 2005 and subsequently to the Supreme Court judgment on November 22, 2011.

    Read Also: Fed Govt cautions Nigerians travelling to UK over risk of violence

    In the beginning

    Justice Ariwoola sounded optimistic and evinced a determination to make a difference on November 28, 2022, at the special court session to mark the Supreme Court’s 2022/2023 legal year, his first as the CJN.

    He pledged that the third arm of government would do more in the new legal year to deliver on its constitutional mandate of justice delivery.

    Ariwoola added: “The prosperity of the Nigerian Judiciary is the responsibility of all of us.

    “We must not shy away from the challenges staring us in the face because if the judiciary fails, there will certainly be no country to call Nigeria.

    “Those wishing us bad and even engaging in different forms of unwholesome conduct to sink the ship, will certainly not be comfortable with the likely result that would emerge from such unpatriotic effort.

    “Nigeria is a project in our hands that must be collectively nurtured to prosperity and Eldorado.

    “We cannot run away from those vices that confront us as a nation, rather, we have to fasten our belts and face them head-on.”

    Full complement of justices

    As his family, friends, colleagues and admirers prepare for the valedictory court service to be held in his honour by the Supreme Court on August 22, opinions are however divided about his impact in office.

    While some are of the view that he discharged his responsibilities creditably well, others argue that he did not do enough.

    To those who believe the outgoing CJN did his best, the fact that he is not leaving unceremoniously, like his immediate two predecessors, is sufficient to make him walk with his head held high.

    The Director of Information and Public Relations at the Supreme Court, Dr. Festus Akande recalled that one of the many achievements of Justice Ariwoola was that he effectively worked with the relevant stakeholders in increasing the number of Supreme Court Justices to 21 to meet its full complement for the very first time in history.  

    While speaking on November 27, 2023, at the special court session to mark the Supreme Court’s 2023/2024 legal year, his second and last as the CJN, Justice Ariwoola regretted the depletion in the number of the court’s Justices but disclosed that the process of appointing new ones was almost completed.

    He said: “As soon as I assumed office on the 27th day of June, 2022, I immediately got down to work on this urgent and immediate need in particular.

    “Though we have not gotten them on board yet, I can convincingly assure the litigant public that within a very short while, the Supreme Court of Nigeria will, for the very first time in its history, get the constitutionally prescribed full complement of 21 Justices.

    “That is one of the legacies I have been working assiduously to leave behind as it now seems that the court has been somewhat ‘jinxed’ from meeting its constitutional requirement since that piece of legislation was enacted several years ago.”

    True to his word, on February 26, 11 new Justices were added to the apex court’s Bench.

    Akande also noted upon assuming office, Ariwoola sustained the call for an enhanced welfare package for the nation’s judicial officers.

    He added that in this regard, the CJN activated “the mutual dialogue and effective consultation with the relevant authorities that resulted in the National Assembly Bill to increase the remuneration of judicial officers.”

    Akande said efforts by the outgoing CJN resulted in automating the Enrolment Unit of the Supreme Court to enable all lawyers called to Nigeria Bar to be able to enrol online without necessarily going to the Supreme Court physically.

    “This is now done by simply uploading a passport photograph, scanned signature,  qualifying certificate issued by the Nigerian Council of Legal Education (NCLE) and Call to Bar Certificate issued by the Body of Benchers,” he said.

    Supreme Court’s role in naira crisis

    Others, who also believe that Ariwoola did his best, recalled how the Supreme Court effectively deployed its power as a policy court to address the challenge posed by the naira redesign exercise carried out under the last administration.

    In a unanimous judgment delivered on March 3, 2023, a seven-member panel, presided by Justice Inyang Okoro held that the directive by President Muhammadu Buhari to the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) for the redesigning and withdrawal of old notes of N200, N500 and N1,000, without consultation with the states, the Federal Executive Council (FEC) and the National Council of State and other stakeholders, was unconstitutional.

    The apex court observed that no reasonable notice was given before the implementation of the policy as provided under the CBN Act.

    In the lead judgement, Justice Emmanuel Agim also dismissed the preliminary objection by the federal government challenging the jurisdiction of the apex court to hear the suits by the 16 states challenging the currency policy.

    Justice Agim was unhappy that former President Buhari failed to comply with the court’s earlier order, directing the Federal Goverment to delay the implementation of the police.

    He said: “The rule of law upon which our democratic governance is founded becomes illusory if the President of the country or any authority or person refuses to obey the orders of courts.

    “The disobedience of orders of courts by the President in a constitutional democracy as ours is a sign of the failure of the constitution and that democratic governance has become a mere pretension and is now replaced by autocracy or dictatorship.”

    Local govt autonomy

    The Supreme Court under Justice Ariwoola, also intervened recently with its judgment given on July 11 granting financial autonomy to Local Governments.

    The apex court, in the judgment, held among others that it was wrong for the state government to retain and utilise Local Governments’ statutory allocations paid through them for onward transfer to the councils.

    A seven-member panel of the apex court also declared unlawful the running of Local Governments by non-elected officials and those appointed by the state government or governor.

    The court also declared as gross misconduct the dissolution of democratically elected Local Governments by governors, whose responsibility, under Section 7 (1) of the Constitution is to ensure the existence of democratically elected Local Governments.

    It barred the Federal Government from releasing funds to Local Governments being managed by undemocratically elected officials.

    The judgment was on the suit marked: SC/CV/343/2024 filed on behalf of the Federal Government by the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), with all the 36 states’ Attorneys General as defendants.

    Judicial discipline

    Under Ariwoola, some erring judicial officers have had disciplinary measures applied to them, the latest case being the decision taken at the 105th meeting of the National Judicial Council (NJC) held between May 15 and 16.

    The NJC, at the meeting, resolved to issue warning letters to Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court and Justice GB Brikins-Okolosi of Delta State High Court.

    Justice Ekwo was warned for abuse of the discretionary power of a judge by wrongly granting an ex-parte order in a suit between Juliet Ebere Nwadi Gbaka & 2 Ors V Seplat Energy Plc & 12 Ors.

    Justice Ekwo was also barred from being elevated to a higher Bench for two years.

    Hon. Justice GB Brikins-Okolosi of Delta State High Court was, on his part,  issued a warning for failure to deliver judgement within the stipulated period in Joseph Anene Okafor Vs Skye Bank, after parties had filed and adopted their final written addresses.

    Justice Brikins-Okolosi was also barred from being elevated to a higher Bench for a period of three years.

    The NJC cautioned Justice Amina Shehu of Yobe State High Court for issuing writ of possession, conferring title on the defendant in a suit when there was no subsisting judgement of any court to enable His Lordship to issue the writ.

    Lawyers’ views

    Lawyers like  Dr. Joseph Nwobike (SAN) and Wahab Shittu (SAN) are of the view that Justice Ariwoola has not done badly.

    Nwobike hailed Ariwoola’s commitment to upholding judicial integrity, stressing that his tenure “ensured that vacancies in the various levels of the Judiciary are filled with despatch and generally improved on the welfare of judicial officers.”

    According to Shittu, the outgoing CJN’s tenure has been marked by a commitment to integrity, fairness, and justice, which has earned him admiration and respect within and beyond the legal community.

    “Justice Ariwoola’s tenure saw significant judicial reforms and efforts to combat corruption. His administration was notable for its role in overseeing the most keenly contested election since Nigeria’s return to democratic governance in 1999.

    “During his tenure, there were remarkable efforts in the fight against corruption, particularly in the public sector.

    “Critics argue that there still exist different levels of administrative incompetence and poor adroitness in the judiciary.

    “They also point out that efforts to protect the judiciary from political influence, particularly from the Executive branch, were insufficient,” he said.

    Criticisms

    On April 15 a coalition of Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) engaged in a protest in Abuja and called for an independent investigation into the allegations of nepotism and favouritism against Ariwoola shortly after his son, Olukayode Ariwoola Jr. was appointed a judge of the Federal High Court.

    The protesters, under the aegis of the Civil Society Consortium on Judicial Accountability (CSCJA)  also accused the CJN of influencing the appointment of his younger brother, Adebayo Ariwoola, as an auditor at the NJC.

    Addressing the protesters, Martin Obono, who claimed to be their leader, said the allegations should not be swept under the carpet.

    He added that should the CJN be found guilty after the investigation, he should be sanctioned.

    Obono added: “We, therefore, request that an independent inquiry into the appointment of Olukayode Ariwoola Jr. and the nomination of Oluwakemi Victoria Ariwoola be conducted to determine whether there were other suitably qualified persons nominated.

    “In line with the age-old judicial maxim nemo judex in causa sua, Justice Olukayode Ariwoola should be asked to recuse himself as Chairman of the National Judicial Council pending the determination of the investigation.

    “The investigation should be conducted and concluded within the shortest possible time and the results of the investigation be made available to the Petitioners and the Public.

    “If Justice Olukayode Ariwoola is found to have breached the Code of Conduct, appropriate disciplinary measures be meted against him”.

    Among the protesters were members from the Public Interest Lawyers League (PILA); Open Justice Alliance (OJA) ; Tap iNitiative (TI), Citizens Gavel (CG), among others.

    They equally demanded that the office of the CJN be unbundled to avoid being further abused.

    On his last day on the Bench of the Supreme Court, Justice Musa Dattijo Muhammad (now retired) alluded to nepotism, favouritism, corruption and abuse of office in the Judiciary.

    Speaking on October 27, 2023, during his valedictory court session, Justice Muhammed blamed the CJN for the depletion in the Bench of the apex court. He also called for an investigation of the Judiciary’s finances.

    While blaming the CJN for the delay in appointing Justices for the Supreme Court Justice Muhammad said: “Appropriate steps could have been taken since to fill outstanding vacancies in the apex court. Why have these steps not been timeously taken?

    “It is evident that the decision not to fill the vacancies in the court is deliberate. It is all about the absolute powers vested in the office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria and the responsible exercise of same. “

    On the need for transparency and accountability in the deployment of funds allocated to the Judiciary, he said: “Beyond the issue of the salaries of Justices remaining static with no graduation for over 15 years now, it is instructive to enquire what the Judiciary also does with its allocations.

    “Who is responsible for the expenditure? An unrelenting searchlight needs to be beamed to unravel how the sums are expended.

    “Notwithstanding the phenomenal increases in the sums appropriated and released to the Judiciary, Justices and officers’ welfare and the quality of service the Judiciary render have continued to decline,” Justice Muhammad said.

    Observing that things were wrong with judges’ appointment process, Justice Muhammad said: “A couple of years ago, appointment to the bench was strictly on merit. Sound knowledge of the law, integrity, honour, and hard work distinguished those who were elevated.

    “Lobbying was unheard of. | never lobbied, not at any stage of my career, to secure any appointment or elevation.

    “As much as possible, the most qualified men and women were appointed. That can no longer be said about appointments to the Bench.

    “The Judiciary must be uniquely above board. Appointments should not be polluted by political, selfish, and sectional interests. The place of merit, it must be urged, cannot be over-emphasised.

    “Public perceptions of the Judiciary have, over the years, become witheringly scornful and monstrously critical.

    “It has been in the public space that court officials and judges are easily bribed by litigants to obviate delays and or obtain favourable judgments,” Justice Muhammad said.

    Former Chairman of the Board of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Prof. Chidi Odinkalu has consistently spoken out against some decisions taken by the Judiciary under Justice Ariwoola.

    Addressing a press conference recently, Odinkalu claimed that judicial independence had been trumped and appointments to the Bench have been politicised.

    Odinkalu noted that out of the 34 original nominees for appointment as judges that year, 23 were sons, daughters, mistresses and acquaintances of top-ranking politicians.

    He argued that members of the Judiciary conduct themselves as if they are oblivious to the enormity of the power vested in them by the Constitution and other relevant legal frameworks.

    Odinkalu contended that the Judiciary has abdicated its core responsibility to dispense justice, and instead, elected to fraternise with politicians in thwarting democratic processes.

    He called for the unbundling of the office of the CJN and the diffusion of the omnibus powers of that office, thereby allowing transparency and accountability.

    Odinkalu added that the same to be done with the NJC and urged for a review of the  judicial appointment process

    Another lawyer, Jibrim Titus noted that Justice Ariwoola was also part of the Supreme Court conclave that protested against his immediate predecessor, Justice Tanko Muhammad, accusing him among others of poor leadership, unresponsiveness, nepotism and maladministration in overseeing the business and welfare of the Supreme Court and its Justices.

    “Titus said: “One would have expected a CJN, who came into office under this circumstance to do all within his powers to restore the stature of Judiciary and redeem its image which has been badly impacted by the misconduct of many judicial officers. But unfortunately, this has not been so.”

  • CJN Ariwoola bows out August 22

    CJN Ariwoola bows out August 22

    • Supreme Court fixes valedictory session
    • Apex court Justices on vacation till September 23

    The Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, will retire on August 22, when he will attain the age of 70.

    The Supreme Court has fixed the date for a valedictory court service to honour the CJN towards his retirement.

    The apex court has also proceeded on its annual vacation following the conclusion of its 2023/2024 legal year.

    The Nation learnt that the vacation, which officially started on July 22, will end on September 23, while the ceremony to mark the beginning of the 2024/2025 legal year will hold on September 30.

    It was also learnt that Justice Ariwoola will attain 70 years, the mandatory retirement age for Justices of the apex court, on August 22.

    Traditionally, Justice Ariwoola will be succeeded, in an acting capacity, by the most senior Justice of the court, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun.

    Read Also: CJN Ariwoola swears in 12 as judges of FCT High Court Wednesday

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) will then recommend a substantive CJN to the President, who will, in turn, nominate the recommended candidate to the Senate for confirmation.

    The court’s Director of Information and Public Relations, Dr. Festus Akande, who confirmed the development yesterday, said the Supreme Court’s 2023/2024 legal year ended on July 19.

    Akande said: “The Supreme Court’s 2023/2024 legal year ended on Friday, July 19, 2024.

    “The court proceeded on vacation on Monday, July 22, 2024 and will resume for the first term 2024/2025 legal year on Monday, September 23, 2024.

    “However, the valedictory court session for the retiring Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Olukayode Ariwoola (GCON), shall hold on Thursday, August 22, 2024.

    “The ceremony to usher in the 2024/2025 new legal year is scheduled to hold on Monday, September 30, 2024.”

  • FCT High Court gets 12 new judges

    FCT High Court gets 12 new judges

    The Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, will swear-in 12 new judges of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) on Wednesday.

    A statement by the Director of Press and Information at the Supreme Court, Dr. Festus Akande, said the event will hold by 10am at the main courtroom of the Supreme Court.

    One of the 12, identified as Ariwoola Oluwakemi Victoria (Oyo State), is believed to be the CJN’s daughter-in-law.

    Read Also: Senate intensifies probe on N30trn CBN’s loan to Buhari’s administration

    Also among the 12 is Lesley Nkesi Belema Wike (Rivers State), but it was not confirmed if she is related to the FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike.

    Others to be sworn in are Buetnaan Mandy Bassi (Plateau), Ademuyiwa Olakunle Oyeyipo (Kwara), Bamodu Odunayo Olutomi (Lagos), Iheabunike Anumaenwe Godwin (Imo),

    Odo Celestine Obinna (Enugu), Hauwa Lawal Gummi (Zamfara), Sarah Benjamin Inesu Avoh (Bayelsa), and Maryam Iye Yusuf (Kogi State).

    Also to be sworn in are Ibrahim Tanko Munirat (Bauchi) and Abdulrahman Usman (Taraba).

  • CJN Ariwoola swears in 12 as judges of FCT High Court Wednesday

    CJN Ariwoola swears in 12 as judges of FCT High Court Wednesday

    The Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Olukayode Ariwoola will on Wednesday, July 10, swear in twelve newly appointed judges of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    The event, according to a statement by the director of Press and Information at the Supreme Court of Nigeria, Dr. Festus Akande, will hold at 10 am in the main courtroom of the Supreme Court.

    One of the 12, identified as Ariwoola Oluwakemi Victoria (from Oyo state) is believed to be the CJN’s daughter-in-law.

    Akande identified Lesley Nkesi Belema Wike (from Rivers State) as one of the 12.

    Read Also: Tinubu to army: don’t allow violent groups overrun Nigeria

    It was not confirmed if there is any relationship between her and the Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wike.

    There are also Buetnaan Mandy Bassi (from Plateau State), Ademuyiwa Olakunle Oyeyipo (from Kwara State), Bamodu Odunayo Olutomi (from Lagos State) and Iheabunike Anumaenwe Godwin (from Imo State).

    Also on the list are Odo Celestine Obinna (from Enugu State), Hauwa Lawal Gummi (from Zamfara State), Sarah Benjamin Inesu Avoh (from Bayelsa State), and Maryam lye Yusuf (from Kogi State).

    Others are Ibrahim Tanko Munirat (from Bauchi State) and Abdulrahman Usman (from Taraba State).