Tag: arms deal

  • Dasuki to Presidency: I am ready for trial

    Dasuki to Presidency: I am ready for trial

    The former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd), on Wednesday said he is ready for trial over the N644billion fictitious arms deal uncovered by a probe panel.

    Dasuki said he acted in the interest of the country and with the fear of God in office.

    He also said that contrary to the claim of the Presidency, he submitted a comprehensive list of arms procured to President Muhammadu Buhari before leaving office.

    He said all contracts and payments were approved by ex-President Goodluck Jonathan.

    Dasuki, who opened up in a statement he personally signed on Wednesday, declared that he was prepared to meet the Federal Government in court.

    The ex-NSA said he had a lot to tell Nigerians except for the security of the country which was guiding him.

    He said: “In a theatrical manner, the Presidency fed the public with many allegations against my person and yet to be named former public officers.

    “To draw sympathy, the Presidency quoted some absurd findings including extra-budgetary interventions, award of fictitious contracts, 53 failed contracts, payment for jobs without contractual agreements and non-execution of contracts for the purchase of four Alpha jets, bombs and ammunition.

    “For undiscerning Nigerians, they may tend to assume that the allegations were true and pronounce the former National Security Adviser guilty as charged.

    “The statement issued by the Special Adviser on Media and Publicity to the President, Mr. Femi Adesina, who should know better as a former President of the Nigerian Guild of Editors and a witness to history, was nothing sort of propaganda to cast aspersions on Dasuki.

    “To set the records straight, Nigerians should appreciate that the AVM Jon Ode-led panel did not invite the ex-NSA under any guise before arriving at its ambiguous findings.

    “At least, fairness demands that the panel ought to hear from Dasuki instead of its recourse to hasty conclusions.

    “If the panel had been more patient and painstaking, it would have been availed of all relevant documents on some of the jaundiced findings.

    “As if acting a script, the Presidency alleged that the panel accused Dasuki of awarding fictitious contracts between March 2012 and March 2015.

    “Contrary to this claim, Dasuki was not the NSA in March 2012 and he could not have awarded any contract in whatever name. The ex-NSA was appointed by ex-President Goodluck Jonathan on June 22, 2012.”

    The ex-NSA also explained that all arms contracts and payments were approved by Jonathan.

    He said all the services acknowledged the delivery of military equipment supplied to them.

     

     

  • U.S. blocks Israeli arms deal with Nigeria

    U.S. blocks Israeli arms deal with Nigeria

    Citing human rights abuses and widespread corruption in nixing helicopter sale, the United States has reportedly vetoed a 2014 arms sale of US-made Cobra helicopters by Israel to Nigeria.

    Though the resale of decommissioned gunships was approved by Israel’s Defence Ministry, Washington stopped the deal over concerns that the Nigerian government was not doing enough to avoid civilian casualties in its ongoing fight with Boko Haram, Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported yesterday.

    The canceled sale has further strained Washington’s already tense ties with Nigeria over the government’s response to the five-year-long insurgency by the Islamist group.

    Beyond its concern over human rights abuses, the Obama administration has significantly limited its security assistance to Nigeria in recent months, due to widespread government corruption and a possible Boko Haram infiltration into the Nigerian military, The New York Times reported in December.

    Though Asia remains Israel’s biggest arms customer, military exports to African nations virtually doubled in 2013.  A total of $224 million worth of arms and military technology was sold to African countries, compared to $107 million in 2012.

    According to defence sources, a second African country could be a potential buyer for the helicopters, though the Defence Ministry declined to comment on the report.

    During a visit to Nigeria on Sunday, US Secretary of State John Kerry said Washington was prepared to increase its support for the fight against Boko Haram, provided next month’s elections take place peacefully and democratically

  • $9.3m arms deal: Presidency exonerates Oritsejafor

    $9.3m arms deal: Presidency exonerates Oritsejafor

    ‘He has no case to answer’

    The Federal Government vindicated yesterday the President of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, in the alleged involvement of his aircraft in the controversial $9.3m arms deal in South Africa.

    The Senior Special Assistant to President Goodluck Jonathan (Public Communication), Dr. Doyin Okupe, told reporters in Abuja that Oritsejafor, the Founder of the Word of Life Bible Church, has no hand in the deal.

    He said: “Most Nigerians do not respect the sensibilities of other people. Oritsejafor is the President of CAN and head of all Christians in Nigeria, who is representing at least, 50 per cent of people in this country. When it comes to a man like that, people should be cautious and circumspect.”

    Okupe advised Nigerians not to play politics with issues of national concern, saying it was not patriotic.

    According to him, the Office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) did well by telling the truth.

    The presidential aide said it would not be proper for the government to make public its plans on how to tackle insecurity.

    Okupe said: “The linking of Pastor Oritsejafor with the controversial $9.3m arms deal is the most unfortunate thing. To put the very respectable, responsible, honest and sincere CAN President in this matter is the extreme of mischief. It shows what Nigerians can do. They go to any extent to politicise everything. What bothers me is the manner people want to bring down Pastor Oritsejafor on this matter. It is pure absurdity.

    “Oritsejafor has no business in this matter. It is true that he owns the aircraft, but there are over 200 Nigerians, who have jets. Besides those who use them frequently, some give them out to get money and defray costs. If you park your jet, you pay parking charges everyday.

    “He gave the jet to a company to manage. The company is managing it and these people gave out the plane. What has this to do with Oritsejafor? If I have many cars at the airport and decide to give one to a car hire service and he decides to carry somebody having Indian hemp, would you link me with the man who gave it out? Excuse me, this is ridiculous.”

    He also responded to criticisms that the issue went out of hand because government did not speak on the issue before embarking on the adventure.

    Okupe said: “Government cannot share all information about the issues because it is a security matter. It is an issue, which we cannot just bring to the public domain. For goodness sake, we need to have some quiet innocent support. I am surprised that Nigerians want to discuss security issues publicly when a war is still going on.

    “These are very serious national security affairs and running a government is not the same thing as running a Shoprite, where everything is on the table and on display. There is nothing shady about the South African deal and the Office of the NSA has done very well because at the appropriate time, they came in that, ‘yes, this money belongs to us and this was what it was meant for’. That explanation itself was okay. There is no hanky- panky on this matter.”

    He said the second controversial deal had legitimised the first because it was a normal banking transaction.

    “A company was mandated to do a national security assignment for the Federal Government and because of the extant laws in South Africa, that company was unable to deliver its contractual agreement with the Nigerian government. The company wants a refund, which is normal.”

  • Outrage over $5.7m arms deal

    Outrage over $5.7m arms deal

    There was outrage yesterday at the seizure of yet another cash belonging to Nigeria.

    The $5.7 million was meant to buy arms through a third party.

    The criticisms were scathing, with the Federal Government getting knocks for burgling yet another arms purchase — the second in three weeks.

    The lid on this deal was removed by a South African newspaper on Monday – three weeks after the seizure of $9.3 million cash, which was also meant for arms purchase. The money was taken in cash inside a bombardier jet to Johannesburg.

    The South African Asset Forfeiture Unit of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) said the money was frozen for illegal transaction.

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) yesterday led the condemnation of the action, which it described as “embarrassing”.

    But National Security Adviser (NSA) Col. Sambo Dasuki, who issued the end-user certificate for the transaction, said there was nothing untoward about it to warrant the action taken by the South African government agency.

    Senior lawyers and opinion leaders also decried the seizure of the cash, which they described as “shameful”.

    They said it was unfortunate that a similar “illegal transaction” could occur again when the backlash from the first one is yet to settle.

    They said all those involved in the “shady deals” must resign and be prosecuted, if the country wants to repair its battered image.

    According to them, in other climes, not only would those involved in the first incident have been named and made to resign, their trial would have started.

    The lawyers praised South Africa for exposing Nigerian officials’ “shady deals”, urging the country to make public its investigation.

    Former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President Oluwarotimi Akeredolu (SAN), activist-lawyer Festus Keyamo, former NBA Ikeja Branch chairman Monday Ubani, constitutional lawyer Ike Ofuokwu and an Imo State governorship aspirant, Mr Ike Ibe, a lawyer, called for the prosecution of all those involved in the “shady” deals.

    Akeredolu said the government’s admission of being involved in what he called cross border crime is an indictment of the leadership.

    “Seizure of hard currency said to belong to the Nigerian government by the South African government is, to say the least, a national disgrace. The Federal Government under the watch of President Goodluck Jonathan owes Nigerians an explanation. The question, however, is: What explanation?

    “The admission by the government of its involvement in this cross border crime only underscores the character of persons we have regrettably saddled with leadership. This development is undoubtedly a source of embarrassment to decent Nigerians.

    “This clear act of illegality must be called to question by the National Assembly with the responsible agencies directed to investigate and punish those found culpable whether in agbada, khaki or cassock,” Akeredolu said.

    Keyamo said the cash seizures were not only embarrassing, but are a disgrace.

    These transactions are highly suspicious; they smack of illegality, and it is embarrassing and very shameful that the Federal Government can be linked one way or the other to these shady deals.

    “They’re dragging the name of the entire Federal Republic of Nigeria into complete disrepute in the eyes of the international community. What is going on is a ground for highly-placed public officials linked to these transactions to resign, be removed from office or be impeached. Unfortunately, none of these has happened. It is a shame,” Keyamo said.

    To Ofuokwu, there must be something “sinister” about the “arms” deals. He said Nigeria was portrayed as a nation of criminals before the world.

    “The Federal Government has thrown caution and all known fiscal decency and responsibility to the wind. There must be something sinister about this arms deal, if at all there is any. Their conduct with these cash seizures is, to say the least, a monumental shame and embarrassment to us as a nation.

    “The advisers and functionaries of this government, I believe, have differently or jointly resolved to pull down this government by all their actions. We, as a nation, have lost about USD15million in less than one month to South Africa.

    “With this development, South Africa continues to climb up the ladder of development index whilst Nigeria continues its decline in all spheres. This conduct only portrays us as a people and as a nation of criminals and very primitive ones for that matter.

    “What is the essence of the cashless policy being put in place if the Government in itself under the watchful eyes of the Central Bank is still conducting business in this manner? Honestly, if the truth must be told, it all boils down to primitive acquisition which our public servants are well known for,” Ofuokwu said.

    Ibe said heads should have been rolling if there was no cover-up by the government. “After the first and second incidents involving the same unwholesome means and the same South Africa, by now heads should have been rolling.

    “This is either gross incompetence on the part of officials charged with the responsibility of legitimate arms purchase or an attempt to rubbish Nigeria’s national integrity and sovereignty.

    “I call on the President to take all steps both domestic and diplomatic to arrest this ugly trend and bring to book anyone who played any inappropriate role in the entire mess,” he said.

    Ubani urged Nigerians to ensure the matter is not swept under the carpet. His words: “It’s a very big source of embarrassment. All this while, we’ve been saying that monies are being taken outside our shores. What we were not sure is the method, the source and countries they’re taking them to. But this time, South Africa has become the destination point. The first time, they explained it away. This time, there is more to it.

    “If it were a serious country, these incidents are not merely coincidental – they’re enough to make any government lose its legitimacy in the eyes of the people, and officials should be resigning. Why would South Africa be taking on Nigeria? If Nigeria is respected by the rest of the world, why would South Africa be in a haste to expose all our faults and embarrass us in the eyes of the world?

    “It means they really have facts that these guys have been milking this country dry. They’re angry with the Nigerian government in the way it is treating its citizens. They must be tired of the kind of corruption that Nigeria is noted for. In every human development index Nigeria is always rated low.

    “They’re trying to portray Nigeria, which claimed to have rebased its economy and is bigger than South Africa, in a very bad light and show there is something wrong about Nigeria and about its fight against corruption. Maybe South Africa now wants to be on the side of the Nigerian people.

    “If it is a country where the people know their rights, where the citizens are united, not divided on ethnic or religious lines, what will be done is that whoever is involved in this must resign and be prosecuted. But if that happens, people will bring up religious, ethnic and political party sentiments and the whole thing will die off and our leaders will be laughing at us while drinking Champagne.

    “The House of Representatives did not investigate the first one and it has even become a dead matter. If care is not taken, in a week’s time, this one will also be a dead matter and nothing will happen. As long as we’re not united, nothing will happen.”

    Mr George Oguntade (SAN), described as worrying the failure of the Minister of Finance, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala or the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to clarify the “embarrassing” arms transactions.

    He said: “These recent incidents involving seizure of very substantial amounts of money allegedly belonging to the Nigerian State by another government is indeed a national embarrassment.

    “The frequency of the incidents will also appear to raise questions as to the legitimacy of the transactions. It is either those involved are utterly ignorant of global money laundering protocols or deliberately attempted to circumvent same. Both do not augur well for the Nigerian state whose name has been appropriated to these transactions.”

    To Oguntade, “it is incredulous that neither the CBN governor nor the Minister of Finance has made an official statement on the matters.”

    “This paints a very bad picture of the Nigerian state and provides ample justification for the global view that fiscal irresponsibility is the order of the day by the Nigerian government and that this will not in way aid the war against terrorism which has confronted it for some years now.

    “It is high time citizens of Nigeria raised their voices and call the government to order on these shameful shenanigans,” Oguntade said.

    Theophilus Akanwa described as “disappointing” the fact that government officials would engage in a transaction that could result in a national embarrassment and humiliation by another country.

    He questioned the sincerity of the transactions, if the deals could not be brokered through legitimate means rather than violating South African laws.

    Said Akanwa: “Assuming there is the need to purchase arms for the nation, I am perplexed on the reasons why Mr president will not order the right channels to be followed to avoid the further sinking of our country’s image on corruption.

    “Why the cashless policy introduced by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) when the government is still carrying cash? Where is CBN and what was it’s role in all these cash carrying?, he said.

     

  • UN gets petition on $9.3 million ‘arms deal’

    UN gets petition on $9.3 million ‘arms deal’

    A diaspora group, Nigeria Unite Group, has petitioned the Office of the Secretary- General of the United Nations (UN) on the alleged $9.3million arms deal.

    The group in a petition by the Coordinator and Secretary, Dr. Mohammed Hussaini and Francis John, said the arms deal was a violation of the principles enshrined in the global Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).

    The statement said: “Although the government has admitted knowledge of the deal, it has denied any complicity in the attempt to commit a crime.

    “This is a violation of the principles enshrined in the global Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). Moreover, the explanations given by the two Nigerians and one Israeli arrested by the South African investigators are flawed and riddled with discrepancies.”

    The body said the manner of the transaction and the channel the money passed through, called for questioning, adding that government was covering up the arms contract with an unauthorised agency.

    It said that the UN should act on its petition to enable Nigerians know the truth.

    Drawing a parallel between the revelations by an Australian Hostage Negotiator, Dr. Stephen Davis and the botched arms deal, the group said the UN must take urgent and holistic measures to investigate the issues, to ensure peace and security.

    The statement further reads: “We demand a full, urgent and independent investigation by the UN into the $9.3million arms deal, which is suspicious and flawed by the international standards of arms sales.