Tag: ASUU

  • ASUU advocates socialist welfare state for Nigeria

    ASUU advocates socialist welfare state for Nigeria

    •Knocks National Conference 

    The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has called for the establishment of a social welfare state as the first step to address the nation’s sundry challenges.

    The union also said a National Conference is not the solution to Nigeria’s problems.

    ASUU’s President Isa Fagee, who addressed reporters in Calabar, the Cross River State ccapital, yesterday after the union’s National Executive Council (NEC) meeting.

    He said the nation’s problems emanate mostly from the dynamics of global capitalism in which the nation is entrenched.

    He said the change, among other things, would involve taking radical and effective measures to liberally and generously elevate the welfare of the poor.

    Fagee said: “This will require the building of people’s (not ruling class-dominated) political organisations and structures. This will require new politicians and judicial actors, among others.

    “The present constitution forbids the appropriation of commanding heights of the economy by a few people. All governments have violated and continue to violate this provision.

    “The socialist welfare state will creatively reconstruct Nigeria’s economic and political institutions to serve the welfare needs of Nigerians.

    “It will remove the economic basis of the nationality problem, promote freedom of religion in condition of equality of citizens, and remove the basis of state plunder and terror.

    “In the socialist welfare, the deep historical, cultural ties among the people will be preserved and developed. The political forms of organisation in the socialist welfare state will be at once democratic and non-chauvinistic ethno-nationalism while promoting genuine cultural integration.

    “Here, we have a responsibility to devise a Nigerian version of the welfare state to suit our cultural peculiarities and our history. The transition to the socialist welfare state may be kick-started with an insistence by the civil society on strict adherence to the principles of ownership and control of the economy as well as the transparent management of the economy, as reflected in the 1999 Constitution and several federal and state laws.

    “The major productive assets of Nigeria must not be concentrated in the hands of a minority ruling class. They will be publicly owned and run effectively. A new socialist constitution will emerge to back up the socialist transformation.

    “The adoption of a socialist welfare state will be reinforced with the decentralisation of legislative power, de-concentration of executive power and general acceptance of contractual non-concentration of power.

    “Our union has rejected the position that a National Conference is the answer to the problems of Nigeria.”

     

  • UniAbuja ASUU begins indefinite strike

    UniAbuja ASUU begins indefinite strike

    The University of Abuja Chapter of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has commenced an indefinite strike over five issues disturbing the union.

    ASUU vowed that until government and the institution’s governing council resolves the issues namely: the White Paper, Check Off dues and Sundry claims, arrears that government owes lecturers, restoration of promotion process and constitution of various committees, the strike will continue.

    According to the Chairman, Dr. Ben Ugheoke, government has not been sincere with ASUU.

    In a telephone conversation, Ugheoke said no level of intimidation will stop the strike adding that members are fully ready for the consequences.

    He said the union will do everything to make the university system workable and conducive for leaning.

    His words: “The strike is valid. We will brief the press on Thursday. We have gone on strike to ensure the release of the White Paper and our check off dues. And the sundry clams and arrears that government owes our members, restoration of our promotion process and constitution of various committees that are wrongly done so that the university can function well. These are the issues and it is a total strike until government and the governing council resolves this issue.

    “We are serious about this development and no matter of intimidation can stop this action.”

     

  • SSANU-LASU joins ASUU’s strike

    SSANU-LASU joins ASUU’s strike

    •’No work No Pay,’ says govt

    Six days after the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), Lagos State University (LASU) chapter declared an indefinite strike, their non-teaching counterpart, the Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities (SSANU) has followed suit.

    Like ASUU, SSANU, which started their indefinite strike last Monday, are protesting the ‘No vacancy, no Promotion’ policy of the university; the hike in school fees that has resulted in a sharp drop in enrolment, and the non-implementation of the 65-year retirement age for non-teaching staff.

    SSANU’s action followed a resolution by the union’s congress last Friday. On Monday, SSANU members also held another congress after which it staged a peaceful protest around the university’s Ojo campus, calling on the management to compel the Lagos State government walk its talk with respect to its agreement with the union in 2010.

    Incidentally, the union’s strike is starting at a time the government has threatened to invoke the ‘no work, no pay’ rule.

    SSANU-LASU chairman, Comrade Oseni Adewale Saheed, however waved the threat.  He said the union had faced more punitive sanctions in the past and is not afraid to maintain its stand.

    “There was a time we went on strike for six months in this university while our salaries were withheld; but we did not die.  This strike will be total! No member of ours will be allowed to work in any office. If the management wants to stop our salary, let them go ahead.

    “No meeting by management should hold in any office manned by our members otherwise we shall disrupt it,” he said.

    On January 13, SSANU suspended its three month-old strike following the intervention of the Special Adviser to the Governor on Education, Otunba Fatai Olukoga.

    He said: “We had a meeting with the committee set up by the state government to look into the matter and resolve it.  But to date this has not been done. Our management also held a meeting with SSANU national executive where it was resolved that all affected staff that were due for promotion should be promoted in accordance with (Governing) Council directive that worker that scored 65 per cent in their Annual Performance and Evaluation Report  (APER), but that has not been done.”

    At the declaration of the ASUU strike on Tuesday last week, its Chairman Dr Adekunle Idris said the union had explored all avenues to get government to implement the agreement to no avail.

    He said when the hike in tuition was introduced in 2011, ASUU decided to study the outcome of the policy, which according to him, has resulted in dwindling enrolment every year.

    Rather than raise tuition fees, ASUU said management should have leveraged on its consultancy services, which he said has not operated for the past two years, to boost its Internally Generated Revenue (IGR).

    Following government’s cold shoulder, Idris said the union approached parents, traditional rulers and other stakeholders in Lagos to prevail on the government to accede to their demands.

    Following the breakdown of talks, ASUU declared a trade dispute on March 24 with 21-day ultimatum, and another 14-day ultimatum which expired on April 29.  All through the ultimatums, Idris noted that neither the government nor the Governing Council responded to letters written to them.

    “We are at a loss as to why the authorities have refused to frontally address these issues for over one year. Of course, rather than dialogue and take steps to reverse the unacceptable trend, the university authority has engaged the use of propaganda, divisive tactics and twisted logic to justify a very bad case,” he said.

  • ASUU to honour Iyayi

    ASUU to honour Iyayi

    •Kicks against fee hike at OAU

    The National Executive Council (NEC) of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has resolved to establish a foundation in honour of Prof. Festus Iyayi, who died last year during the union’s six months strike.

    He died in a car accident on his way to an ASUU-NEC meeting in Abuja.

    The union also resolved to name its National Secretariat, located at the University of Abuja, after the late Iyayi.

    The resolutions were made at ASUU-NEC’s meeting at the University of Ibadan (U.I.), where it was stated that the proposed Iyayi Foundation shall have components such as scholarships for indigent students, publications and literary awards.

    The union condemned the increment of fees at the Obafemi Awolowo University (O.A.U.) and directed its members in the institution to ensure its reversal.

    A statement signed by ASUU National President Dr. Nasir Fagge Isa reads: “University education must be seen as public good. Something anyone can consume as much as desired without reducing the amount available for others. Individuals should not be prevented from consuming it, whether or not they pay for it. The unity, security and development of our country depend on the quality and effectiveness of our university education. This must not be mortgaged at the altar of market forces and/or spurious loan conditions.”

  • ASUU to establish foundation in Iyayi’s honour

    ASUU to establish foundation in Iyayi’s honour

    The National Executive Council (NEC) of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) will establish a foundation in honour of the late Prof. Festus Iyayi.

    This was contained in the resolution released at the end of ASUU’s NEC meeting held at the University of Ibadan on Monday and signed by its National President, Dr. Nasir Fagge.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Iyayi, a former National President of the union, died in November 2013 in a car crash.

    He was travelling to Kano to participate in the union’s NEC meeting called to resolve the six months strike by the union.

    The union in the resolution also resolved to name its national secretariat located at the University of Abuja after the late activist.

    According to the resolution, the foundation will have components which include scholarship awards for indigent students.

    The resolution also condemned the imposition of fees on students of the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, Osun

    The union in the resolution directed its members in OAU to ensure the reversal of the new fees which it described as a violation of ASUU’s standing principle.

    “University education must be seen as public good.

    “ The unity, security and development of our country depend   on the quality and effectiveness of our university education,’’ it said.

  • ASUU, Iyayi’s widow get court’s nod to sue Wada’s driver, others

    ASUU, Iyayi’s widow get court’s nod to sue Wada’s driver, others

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has granted permission to Mrs Grace Iyayi, the widow of former President of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), Prof Festus Iyayi, and the union to apply for an order to compel the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC) to prosecute those allegedly responsible for his death.

    Prof Iyayi died in a motor accident on November 12, last year, at Banda, on the Lokoja-Abuja Expressway.

    The accident involved the car in which he and some others were travelling to Kano for the union’s meeting and the convoy of the Kogi State Governor Idris Wada.

    Justice Adeniyi Ademola granted yesterday an ex parte application for leave to apply for an order of mandamus, brought on behalf of Mrs Iyayi and ASUU by the law firm of Falana and Falana Chambers.

    By yesterday’s court permission, Mrs Iyayi and ASUU can apply for the order of mandamus to compel the FRSC to prosecute a driver in Wada’s convoy, Danladi Baba; and the construction firm working on the road on which the accident occurred: Gitto Construzioni Generali Nigeria Limited.

    The applicants plan to pray the court to compel the FRSC to sue the driver and the construction firm before a Magistrate’s Court in Lokoja “for dangerous driving and creating a road hazard” by failing to provide adequate warning signs on the road, which caused the death of the former ASUU leader.

    They also intend to pray the court for a declaration that the failure of the FRSC to prosecute the driver and the construction firm, after its (FRSC’s) post-accident investigation revealed that they caused the ex-ASUU leader’s death, is illegal and unconstitutional.

    Justice Ademola adjourned the matter till June 6.

  • Insecurity: Hold leaders responsible, ASUU urges Nigerians

    Insecurity: Hold leaders responsible, ASUU urges Nigerians

    The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has attributed the security challenges facing the country to Nigerian leaders’ inability to provide responsible governance and quality education in the country.

    National President of the union, Dr. Nasir Fagge, made this assertion in his welcome address at the opening ceremony of the 18th national delegates conference (NDC) of ASUU held at the University of Ibadan.

    The ASUU boss also called for the overhaul of the country’s economic model, which he noted, “allows for wholesale stealing under the guise of privatisation.”

    He stressed, “The political landscape is increasingly becoming intolerant and desperate; this is unhealthy for the polity. We believe that the Nigerian people are not being presented with sufficient options to choose from. The same crops of crooks are recycling themselves from one party to another to scramble for power.

    “We cannot keep doing the same thing and expect a different result. The ruling elites have systematically edged-out the people from governance equation. This crop of looters in garb of rulers pretending to be leaders cannot create the Nigeria of our dreams.

    “We have a huge burden of responsibility to raise the consciousness of the people to demand for power through a legitimate and transparent electoral process.”

    According to him, the socio-economic inequalities arising from the pervasive corruption in the country have bred all sorts of tendencies and subcultures alien to Nigeria.

    The ASUU boss pondered: “Why is it that our rulers are not only taking us for granted, but are openly contemptuous of us? Why is it that none of the arms of government in the country gives a damn about corruption and recklessness in our land?

    Speaking further, Fagge listed the menace of Boko Haram, armed robbery, kidnapping and militancy, tribal/religious conflicts and electoral malpractices as the major challenges facing the country.

     

  • ASUU issues seven-day ultimatum to LASU

    The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), Lagos State University (LASU) chapter, on Thursday said it had given the institution a seven-day final ultimatum to address its demands.
    The Chairman of the union, Dr. Adekunle Idris, who made this known to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos, said the ultimatum became effective on April 30 and would expire on May 7.

    NAN reports that the union had on March 24, issued a 21- day ultimatum, which expired on April 13 and another 14-days from April 15 that expired on April 29.
    The union had contended that the hike in fee had accounted for drop in student enrolment in the institution.
    The lecturers also expressed dissatisfaction over the “no vacancy, no promotion” policy of the university and the non-implementation of the 2009 University Miscellaneous Provision Act, already operational in other universities.
    In the fresh deadline, Idris told NAN that the lecturers would embark on a comprehensive and indefinite strike if management continued to ignore the union.
    Idris said the fresh ultimatum was another opportunity for the university to meet the union’s demands, and decried the management’s nonchalant attitude toward the issues.
    He said the institution’s governing council, which was their employer, had not invited the union for dialogue since the initial trade dispute was declared.
    “It was only the Chancellor, Sir Okoya Thomas, that invited us for a meeting towards the end of the initial 21-day ultimatum issued and he promised to bring the issue to a logical conclusion, we are yet to hear from him.
    “The parents’ forum also met the union on April 29 and promised to discuss with the government not to allow the issue result into a strike,’’ he said.

  • Under Siege!  Nigeria’s  long-suffering  polytechnics

    Under Siege! Nigeria’s long-suffering polytechnics

    Gboyega Alaka writes on the prolonged strike by the Academic Staff Union of Polytechnics (ASUP).

    ON March 17, students of Nigeria’s premier tertiary institution, Yaba College of Technology, Lagos took to the streets in a peaceful protest march, causing hours of traffic gridlock across Lagos metropolis and literally forcing everyone to pay attention to their plights. They staged the protest in solidarity with their lecturers, the members of the Academic Staff Union of Polytechnics (ASUP), over their prolonged strike (which had gone on for six unbroken months), without a solution in sight. To underline their desperate situation, the students blocked major roads and carried placards with messages such as “We are tired of sleeping at home,’ ‘Enough of polytechnics’ neglect’, ‘We can’t even remember our matriculation number anymore….’

    They were joined by their colleagues from the University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos State Polytechnic (LASPOTECH), Federal Polytechnic, Ilaro, Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Adeniran Ogunsanya College of Education among others.

    Ganiyu Olanrewaju Salvador, president, Yaba College of Technology Students’ Union, said the demonstration had become necessary because the federal government has not been fair in its handling of the lecturers’ strike, arguing that its disposition was much different during the Academic Staff of Universities (ASUU) strike last year. He especially pointed an accusing finger at the supervising minister of education, Nyesom Wike, whom he said has been playing politics with the polytechnic students’ plight.

    In what looked like a crack in the wall of the students’ body, Salvador took a swipe at the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), which he accused of deliberately remaining silent in the face of the ASUP strike that has kept his fellow polytechnic students out of classes for more than half a year. This, he said was contrary to the body’s position during the university lecturers strike and therefore clamoured that it be changed to National Association of University Students, while the polytechnic students across the country form their own body to represent them adequately!

    The polytechnic lecturers have been embroiled in a perpetual struggle with the federal government over some demands which they say are genuine and pertinent for the progress of the polytechnic education sector. According to Adeyemi Aromolaran, chairman ASUP, the strike has been on for seven unbroken months; but it could easily have been nine, had the union in its wisdom not yielded to the appeal of the government to give it two weeks grace to look into the demands.

    “The strike initially commenced in April 2013, but the government specifically requested two weeks to enable it look into four of our 13-point demands. The four issues the government promised to look into are the constitution of a governing council for the various federal polytechnics, payment of the CONTISS 15 salary arrears (which is salary arrears owed some category of junior colleagues who had initially been left out of the new salary structure), the polytechnics NEEDS Assessment and the release of the government white paper on the visitation panel that came visiting the polytechnics in 2009. Out of magnanimity, the union gave the government six weeks, but at the end of the day, the only thing the government did was the constituting of the governing council.”

    This according to Aromolaran was a let-down and a call to ASUP for a show-down. Despite this, he disclosed that the union delayed for another two weeks after the initial six weeks, hoping that the government will revisit the issues and help them avoid going back on strike. “The present strike has therefore been on since October 4,” the ASUP YabaTech chairman said.

    Other major focal points of the industrial action, are the establishment of a polytechnic commission to be devoted to polytechnic affairs (just like the National Universities Commission (NUC), the National Commission for Colleges of Education (NCCE), the Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC) and other such bodies), a review of the act that established the polytechnics, to enable them upgrade and run degree courses (B.Tech) and senior degree courses (M.Tech and D.T) and the ‘removal of discrimination against HND graduates in comparison with their university counterparts by government policy.’

    Conspiracy of silence and subjugation

    These demands he says, are basic and all focused on the development of the polytechnic system and should ordinarily not be allowed to drag. Aromolaran therefore concluded that the continued government silence and apathy further confirms the conspiracy script already playing out against the polytechnic system and the students. According to him, “it is the elites that take decisions about the country and since the children of the elites no longer attend polytechnics, it is no surprise that the government is keeping quiet.”

    He condemned the bias for the university products over polytechnic graduates, saying this is as a result of the human nature of complex defences, which unfortunately is overriding national interest. “The average university students in Nigeria want to see themselves as superior to the polytechnic graduates, colleges of education graduates and even the workers therein; and these are part of the things we are fighting against.”

    He said it has now become a common practice to have polytechnic graduates separated from university products during job interviews and thereafter told to “go home, we will get back to you”, which usually is the end of the story. He thus lamented the dichotomy and blames it on the government policies, which tends to suggest that the polytechnic graduate is inferior, despite their superior and more grounded and practical training. He said the union chose this as one of its demands to rescue the future of the students.

    On a personal note, Aromolaran also considers it a personal insult: “if you tell me that my products are inferior, then you are also telling me by implication that I’m also inferior.” As an academic of repute, he is not ready to take this lying low.

    On his part, Awofodu Jeremiah, who is secretary-general of the Yabatech ASUP, thinks there is a calculated disdain and neglect on the part of the government for polytechnic education, despite the obvious role it is supposed to play as the manpower development sector in the country. He also accused the government of perpetuating the dichotomy between the university and polytechnic products, which has now led to a situation whereby the polytechnic is seen as a last resort and hardly on the radar of the government planning officials.

    A complicit media and public

    Awofodu and his chairman, Aromolaran are also quick to accuse the public of being too passive to the plight of the polytechnic sector, citing the media as a major accomplice here. They recall how volatile and active the media was during the university lecturers’ strike last year and wonder why the same level of coverage is not being given to the polytechnics lecturers’ issues. The implication of the media silence, they say, has therefore been “a low sensitisation of the public about the on-going strike, to the extent that nobody outside the concerned lecturers, and students ever speaks about it. This is even more dangerous now that the polytechnics have been seemingly reduced to a level where only children of peasants and petty traders, who practically have no voice, attend.”

    Aromolaran said it is for this reason that the union took a decision to go on the streets on March 17, to compel the attention of the public, before it was joined in solidarity by the students. That effort yielded some temporary results as most of the national newspapers reported it, with some even devoting their front pages to it. He, however, lamented that everything seems to have gone quiet again. “Even the television stations which are noted for airing vox pops on such issues have simply looked the other way.”

    Government’s arm-twisting and blackmail

    Speaking to our correspondent in Abuja last week, the national president of ASUP, Mr Chibuzor Asomugha berated the supervising minister for education, Nyesom Wike for trying to reduce the whole strike to a battle over payment of salary arrears. In his words, “We are not asking for money. What we are asking for is the revamping of the system, deepening of capacity of our students, making the polytechnics a preferable option for higher education amongst others.” Asomugha, however expressed the union’s resolve not to be cowed, arguing that there is nothing to be ashamed of in demanding for one’s entitlement. He also said every attempt to get the minister to set up a technical committee headed by the permanent secretary of education to discuss the issues and way forward have been rebuffed. He accused the minister of reducing the strike to an ego battle with the lecturers and said the ‘no work, no pay’ order brought to bear since March 21, 2014 will only further jeopardize whatever success the two parties may have achieved so far.

    His position was corroborated by Aromolaran and his secretary, Awofodu. In the words of Awofodu, “It is not the joy of anybody to collect money without working, it is just that the situation on ground warrants that we stand up to the government and demand these changes.” He revealed that most of the lecturers have been resuming at their duties posts and attending to the students’ projects and the Students Industrial Work Experience (SIWES), which is organized by the government.

    The lecturers also condemned a situation where the sector, despite its unique role in the life of a modern nation, is left without a substantive minister. They argued that even the supervising minister is more pre-occupied with his next political agenda, which is to become the next governor of Rivers State.

    Aromolaran also took a swipe at the polytechnic alumnus scattered all over the country, who are already doing well in their various endeavours, wondering why even they are not speaking up against the ‘plundering of a system that made them’.

    On state polytechnics, which are unable to participate in the strike due to their peculiar situations, Aromolaran said they would surely benefit if and when the government decide to yield to their demands. “The presidential committee that conducted the NEEDS Assessment visited state polytechnics during the evaluation process and they will surely benefit, because that is simply a case of funding, which the federal governments will pay to the institutions directly.”

  • How ASUU joined the NLC: a footnote to an underground and unwritten history

    How ASUU joined the NLC: a footnote to an underground and unwritten history

    When in 2007 Patrick F. Wilmot published his explosive book, Nigeria: the Nightmare Scenario, I was startled beyond all measure when I came across his bald and bold claim in the book that it was he, Wilmot, who was responsible for the historic merger of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) with the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC). As a radical, Pan Africanist senior lecturer at Ahmadu Bello University (ABU) for many years, the Jamaican-born Wilmot who was married to a Nigerian had been a member of the ABU branch of ASUU. I was the National President of ASUU for part of the period when Dr. Wilmot was at ABU and we did meet a few times during my innumerable visits to Zaria. But even though he was known as one of the ‘campus radicals’ of ABU, in my perception of what was happening at the time, Wilmot was not particularly active in ASUU-ABU. Thus, I was startled when I read the claim in his 2007 book that he had been the man responsible for ASUU joining the NLC by suggesting the move to the late Mahmud Modibbo Tukur who had succeeded me as ASUU National President. Wilmot’s claim is completely false and I shall have more clarifications to make on it later in this piece when I write about Tukur’s reluctance or reservations about taking ASUU into the NLC.

    The matter of who was responsible for ASUU joining the NLC in 1983 or 1984 (I don’t have my notes and papers with me in Cambridge, Massachusetts to verify the exact date) came up again last year when my friend and fellow writer, Odia Ofeimun, in his moving and eloquent tribute to Festus Iyayi claimed that it was Iyayi who made the historic move when he was President of ASUU. This also is not true and I called Ofeimun both to congratulate him on the brilliance and eloquence of his eulogy to Iyayi and to correct his mistaken claim that Festus had been the man who took ASUU into the NLC. Ofeimun thanked me for the correction and said that he wished that I had seen the draft of his eulogy before it was delivered so that the error could have been averted.

    There was another case of inaccurate attribution of responsibility for the ASUU-NLC merger that was both far more complicated than these other cases of Wilmot and Ofeimun and throws considerable light on the whole matter and this had to do with Dr. Segun Osoba, formerly of the University of Ife, a great historian and a pillar of strength, courage and consistency in the radical movement at OAU Ife in particular and Nigerian universities in general. In a speech that he delivered to a national conference of ASUU after the death of Mahmud Tukur, Osoba asserted that Tukur himself had been the person who took ASUU into the NLC.

    When I read the speech I smiled ruefully at the unintended ironies in Dr. Osoba’s claim. This is because while Osoba was factually correct in stating that it was during the presidency of Tukur that ASUU joined the NLC, what he did not know, or perhaps what he had forgotten is that fact that Tukur was actually not keen on the move and it took a lot of persuasion for him to agree to the NLC-ASUU merger. Moreover, Tukur’s reluctance or lack of enthusiasm was based on solid theoretical and ideological grounds that are worth returning to, that are indeed the basis of my going back to the matter nearly three decades later. So to start with, what was the historic significance of the ASUU-NLC merger and what is its enduring legacy decades after Babangida took ASUU out of the NLC?

    At the present time when the ties and contacts between ASUU and NLC are so intimate and regular and a good umber of Nigerian university lecturers have a keen and supportive in interest in the NLC and the lot of workers, it is perhaps difficult to imagine the vast distance that existed between Nigerian workers and Nigerian academics in the 60s and 70s before ASUU joined the NLC. The distance was so great the only a few radical academics whose number could be counted in single digits had anything to do with the trade unions. Which is why academics like Ola Oni of Ibadan, Eskor Toyo of Calabar and Ikenna Nzimiro of Nsukka stood out among their colleagues as the friends of labour in our universities at the time. Indeed, they not only stood out, they were regarded on the campuses as oddities, “communists” who were deluded in their association with workers and the trade unions. I can add my own personal experience to this observation because when, as a young lecturer, I began to associate closely and regularly with trade unionists, many of my closest friends and associates in the community of radical writers and critics looked at my trade union comrades with suspicion if not indeed with disdain!

    On a much larger historical and global terrain, this was in fact something endemic to virtually all the capitalist societies of the world, this separation of workers from academics, a separation in effect of manual labour from intellectual labour. This fear had and still has a justifiable reality in the fact that an alliance of workers and intellectuals, of workers in the factories and workers in the elite institutions of education in any country in the world often shakes conservative and oppressive capitalist societies to their foundations. This was the larger historical, ideological and political background to the ASUU-NLC merger.

    Against the background of this larger historical and global context, the claim that any one person has sole responsibility for, or was the single moving force in the ASUU-NLC alliance is a fatuous and misleading claim. For my generation of so-called ‘campus radicals” we drew inspiration from and followed the examples of people like Ola Oni, Eskor Toyo and Nzimiro. Speaking for myself, long before I became ASUU President, I had been attending meetings of the NLC as an unofficial observer at the then headquarters of the organization at Ojuelegba in Lagos. And I was reporting my observations and experiences at these meetings to the radical groups to which I belonged at the time principally the Socialist Collective at Ife and the Anti-Poverty Movement of Nigeria (APMON) which had branches all over the country. And when I became ASUU President, with the permission and authority of the National Executive Council of the Union, I applied for and got official observer status at the meetings of the NLC and became quite familiar and intimate with leaders of the trade union movement in our country like “Labour Leader No 1” Pa Imoudou, Hassan Sumonu, S.O.Z. Ejiofor, M.J. Sule and Adams Oshiomhole, the current governor of Edo State who was then a middle-level leader in the trade union movement.

    Again, I must emphasize the fact that only with temporal hindsight can we see now as logical and inevitable what at the time was a very steep and arduous mountain to climb. As ASUU President, it had been relatively easy for me to get official observer status at NLC meetings because we did not have to take the matter to the entire Union and its branches for approval; all I had to do was get the approval of the National Executive Council and this wasn’t difficult. All along, the ultimate objective was that we had to take the whole Union, ASUU, into the NLC. By “we” here I am referring to radicals and progressives at many of the branches of ASUU across the country. “We” were influential but small in numbers; moreover, the majority of the membership of ASUU always watched our moves and tactics with keen, vigilant interest if not with suspicion.

    When Mahmud succeeded me as ASUU President “we” decided that the time had come to make the move. This was because Mahmud was not as strongly “suspected” as a “friend of labour” by the generality of ASUU members as I was. Moreover, it was well known that he was not particularly close to the trade union movement. For this reason, as the Immediate Past President (IPP) with a lot of clout in the Union, I was delegated by the radical left in all the ASUU branches to “work” on Mahmud to make him go along with the objective of taking the whole Union, ASUU into the NLC.

    At this point, I must now take up my earlier observation in this piece that Mahmud had important theoretical and ideological reservations about taking our Union into the NLC. The contents of his reservations and objections can be briefly summarized. First, Mahmud thought that both in practice and ideology, the leadership of the labour movement in Nigeria was radical and progressive in name only; he thought their bark was much bigger than their bite. Secondly, he thought that at key moments in the history of the labour movement in Nigeria, this leadership of the trade union movement had sold out to employers and the government. Finally and most important of all, Mahmud thought that while in his opinion, farmers and rural communities were the most potentially revolutionary force in Nigeria because they were far more extensively and cynically exploited than workers, labor leaders in Nigeria had never sought and pursued an alliance with farmers and rural communities.

    As indicated in the title of this piece, this essay is merely a footnote to an unwritten history. The whole history will be written some day, hopefully sooner than later in the near future. What remains for me to say in concluding this piece is to report that in my theoretical discussions on the matter with Mahmud, I succeeded in making him pay attention to things that were going on in underground currents among workers, farmers and intellectuals in the country, things indicating that the distances between these groups were narrowing and were being transcended. It was on the strength of this that he agreed to go along with the objective of taking ASUU into the NLC. But even then, he refused to personally represent ASUU in the Central Working Committee (CWC) of the NLC as he should have as the incumbent president of our Union. Rather than take his place in the CWC of the NLC, he delegated that task to me as ASUU’s IPP and for close to three years I attended every meeting of that highest organ of the NLC as ASUU representative.

    ASUU was eventually kicked out of the NLC by Babangida but the links had been irrevocably forged such that the formal, autocratic attempt of the dictator to effectively sunder the links failed woefully. Without being a formal affiliate of the NLC, ASUU remains closely connected with the national labour body. The most important expression of the legacy of that historic alliance is the fact that today and well into the future that lies ahead of us, workers and academics in our country no longer see their destinies as separate and unrelated as they once did in the long years and decades before ASUU went into the NLC. A Luta Continua!

    Biodun Jeyifo

    bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu