Tag: ASUU

  • ASUU discusses Jonathan’s offer

    ASUU discusses Jonathan’s offer

    Teachers won’t call off strike until after consultations, says leader

    After 13 hours of negotiations with the Federal Government, the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) got yesterday another offer towards the resolution of the crisis that has crippled the campuses for over four months.

    But ASUU President Dr. Nasir Isa Fagge, did not disclose the new Federal Government’s offer, insisting that its members have the final say on the issue.

    Lecturers were holding meetings on the various campuses last night over the government’s offer.

    Speaking with State House correspondents after the meeting with President Goodluck Jonathan at the First Lady’s Conference Room in the Presidential Villa, Fagge said the meeting was working towards tackling the problem of university education.

    He said: “Well, we have had lengthy meeting with Mr. President, rubbing minds on how best to address the problem of university education in this country.

    “And we now have a message from Mr. President we are going to take to our members. And we are expecting that our members will respond appropriately to the message of Mr. President.”

    On whether the lecturers are going back to the classroom, he said: “That is up to our members.”

    Asked what the message was, he said: “I can’t tell you. Its not for you. It is for our members.”

    If impressed with the message, he said: “Don’t put words into my mouth. Our members will determine that.”

    Also speaking at the end of the meeting, Minister of Labour Emeka Wogu said: “We made progress; the President of ASUU told you that they are going back with a message from the Federal Government to their members. And the message is full of high expectations and hope.”

    On whether the strike will be called off, he said: “That is why the message is full of high expectations and hope. So, our prayers is that they come back with positive outcome. They might not even come back to meet us; they might take decisions there that will meet your expectations.”

    “Nigerians should be patient for ASUU to finish their meetings and come out with a message to Nigerians.”

    Asked whether the government made a fresh offer, Wogu said: “Well, the offers we made are the offers they are taking in line with the 2009 agreement. The issues that led to the strike are issues contained in the 2009 agreement and we did not go beyond the agreement.”

    Before the meeting started on Monday afternoon, President Jonathan had assured the lecturers that the strike would be resolved .

    Jonathan, who took charge of the Federal Government’s negotiations with the lecturers, while exchanging pleasantries with the ASUU team, led by Fagge, said: “My president, all the problems will be over today, all our children must go back to school.”

    Also greeting the NLC President, Comrade Abdulwahab Omar at the beginning of the meeting, President Jonathan said: “My president, with you around today, there will be no problem; our agreement is signed, sealed and delivered.”

    On the Federal Government team were Vice President Namadi Sambo; Wogu; Supervising Minister of Education Nyesom Wike; Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Sen. Anyim Pius Anyim; National Universities Commission (NCC) Executive Secretary Prof Julius Okogie and Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister for the Economy Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.

    Also in the government team are the Chief of Staff, Chief Mike Oghiadhome and the Permanent Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Education, Dr. Mac John Nwaobiala.

    For ASUU were its Vice President, Prof Biodun Ogunyemi, three past presidents of ASUU, Profs. Festus Iyayi, Dipo Fashina and Abdullahi Sule-Kano.

    Others included Prof. Suleiman Abdul; Dr. Victor Igbum and Prof. Victor Osodeke.

    The ASUU team also had Omah and Trade Union President Bobboi Kaigama.

    The Presidency, on September 19, took over negotiations with the striking lecturers with Sambo heading the government’s side.

     

  • ASUU strike: Much talk about morality

    SIR: As the strike embarked upon by Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) enters its fifth month, different groups, observers, individuals and stakeholders in Nigerian Universities have continued to react differently to it. While some have called on ASUU to call off the strike on the ground of morality, others have simply pleaded with her to return to class in the interest of Nigerian students.

    It is worthy to note that the current strike is the result of the failure by Federal Government to honour the agreement it entered with ASUU in 2009. Recall that the 2009 agreement was as result of cumulative efforts of ASUU between the successive military regimes of Babangida, Abdulsalami, and Obasanjo. More worrisome is the recent statement credited to the Senate President, David Mark that: “the current agreement was signed by ignorant government officials”. This remarks from such a highly place personality leaves more to be desired. If the agreement is in error, then the 26% budgetary allocation annually to National Assembly with just 8% to education is definitely an error.

    What is actually the moral thing to do now by all stakeholders of Nigerian University system?

    Will it be morally right to do nothing and have our public universities decay like what is currently happening in Nigerian primary and secondary schools today and allow people to insult ASUU in future for not letting the world know the state of public universities?

    Is it morally right to continue to see our children sitting on the floor receiving lectures and taking examinations; to allow students crowded in the hostel up to 15 to 20 students per room; to continue to use old facilities, outdated textbooks stocked in our libraries?

    Is it morally right to allow private schools built in most cases with stolen funds to thrive at the expense of public schools; for government to continue to deceive itself and Nigerians while enriching the pockets of private individuals; to continue to allow the government to be insincere in its dealings and agreement?

    Probably it is morally right to leave unworthy legacies for our unborn children.

    What is more, is it morally right for government to sponsor a group of students under the umbrella of NANS and market women to protest against a legitimate struggle embarked upon by ASUU that is actually for the betterment of all?

    Government says it has released N100 billion for infrastructural development and N30 Billion for earned allowances. The pertinent question is where is the N100 Billion?

    It is morally right for government to spend over N3 trillion to bailout commercial banks in the wake of the financial crisis in 2007, and N500 billion to the aviation sector; billions of naira to the creative media industry, but no money to fund education?

    I think it is morally justifiable for all well meaning Nigerians to identify with a just cause to secure our collective future- regaining the lost glory of Nigeria’s public universities once and for all.

    Education remains the bed rock of development without which neither peace nor justice can be permanently maintained. Qualitative education means the youths will no longer be used as thugs by some politicians. This is why so many countries invest heavily on education. For instance, Ghana allocates 8.2% of GDP to education, South Africa, 6%, Jamaica, 6.2%, Niger, 4.3% and so on while Nigeria allocated less that 1 % of her GDP to education in 2012. We may never get it right if we jettison our pursuit of quality education. So the earlier this imbroglio is resolved, the better for all.

     

    • Ochalibe Ibu Alexander

    Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi

  • Strike: ASUU members to decide on FG’s  fresh offer

    Strike: ASUU members to decide on FG’s fresh offer

    After 13 hours of negotiations, the President of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) Dr. Nasir Isa Fagge, on Monday was not forthcoming with the new Federal Government’s offer as he insisted that its members have the final say on the issue.

    Speaking with State House correspondents after the meeting with President Goodluck Jonathan at First Lady’s Conference Room in the Presidential Villa, he said the meeting rubbed minds on how to tackle the problems confronting university education system in the country.

    He said: “Well we had lengthy meeting with Mr. President, rubbing minds on how best to address the problem of university education in this country.

    “And we now have a message from Mr. President which we are going to take to our members. And we are expecting that our members will respond appropriately to the message of Mr. President.

    On whether the lecturers are going back to the classroom, he said: “That is up to our members.”

    Asked what the message was, he said: “I can’t tell you. It is not for you. It is for our members.”

    If impressed with the message, he said: “Don’t put words into my mouth. Our members will determine that.”

    Also speaking with journalists at the end of the meeting, the Minister of Labour Emeka Wogu, said: “We made progress, the President of ASUU told you that they are going back with a message from the Federal Government back to their members. And the message is full of high expectations and hope.”

    On whether the strike will be called off, he said: “That is why the message is full of high expectations and hope. So our prayer is that they come back with positive outcome. They might not even come back to meet us, they might take decisions there that will meet your expectations.”

    “Nigerians should be patient for ASUU to finish their meetings and come out with a message to Nigerians.”

    On whether the Federal Government made a fresh offer, Wogu said: “Well, the offer we made are the offer they are taking in line with the 2009 agreement. The issues that led to the strike are issues contained in the 2009 agreement and we did not go beyond the agreement.”

    But before the meeting started on Monday afternoon, President Jonathan had assured the lecturers that the protracted over four months’ old strike would be resolved at the meeting.

    Jonathan, who took charge of the Federal Government’s negotiations with the lecturers, while exchanging pleasantries with the team led by ASUU President, said: “My president all the problems will be over today, all our children must go back to school.”

    Also greeting the NLC President, Comrade Abdulwahab Omar, at the beginning of the meeting, President Jonathan said: “My president with you around today, there will be no problem, our agreement is signed, sealed and delivered.”

    On the Federal Government team are – Vice President Namadi Sambo; Minister of Labour, Chief Emeka Wogu; Supervising Minister of Education, Nyesom Wike; Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Sen. Anyim Pius Anyim; Executive Secretary of the National Universities Commission, Prof Julius Okogie and the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.

     

  • ASUU will call off its strike soon, says Mark

    ASUU will call off its strike soon, says Mark

    Senate President David Mark yesterday met with officials of the striking Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), with the hope of prevailing on them to return to the classroom.

    In a statement yesterday in Abuja by his Chief Press Secretary, Paul Mumeh, the Senate President said there were indications that the four-month-old industrial dispute would soon be resolved.

    Mark said ASUU officials decried the lingering crisis, which has taken its toll on the nation.

    Mark spoke in Abuja during a meeting with ASUU leaders, led by the union’s President, Dr Nasir Fagge.

    Those at the meeting included Prof Festus Iyayi, Dr. Dipo Fashina, Prof Abdullahi Sule-Kano, Prof Biodun Ogunyemi, Prof Victor Osodeke, Dr. A. B. Baffa, Prof Suleiman Abdul, Dr. Victor Igbum and Mr. Michael Odunmorayo.

    The Senate President noted that the strike had brought hardship to students, parents and the lecturers.

    He said: “It is time we resolve this matter in the interest of the nation.

    “This is not a case of winners or losers. It is not a matter of ego. National interest is at stake. We must do all that is necessary to resolve this matter so that students and teachers can return to classrooms.

    “Nobody is happy about the strike, which is in its fourth month. Nobody is happy that our education system is threatened by this ugly development. Let us end this strike for good.”

    Dr Fagge said the struggle was necessitated by the need to improve the infrastructure and learning environment in universities.

    He said the striking lecturers wished to produce graduates who could be as good as their counterparts in other parts of the world.

    The union leader stressed that the strike did not profit the lecturers but was a needed sacrifice for the government to do the right thing in the Education sector.

    He said: “We are not just lecturers; we are also parents and students. So, the strike is also affecting us negatively.”

    The meeting later went into a closed-door session for about two-and-a-half hours.

    The University of Jos (UNIJOS) chapter of the ASUU has said it is not against a dialogue with the Federal Government.

    But it said the strike lingered for over four months because of the government’s high-handedness.

    The union stressed that its dialogue with the government would have been fruitful, if the government had respected the agreement it signed with the union in 2009 as well as acted on the NEEDS Assessment Report.

    A joint statement by the UNIJOS Chairman of the union, Dr. David Jangkam, and the Secretary, Dr. Wamnang, said: “Anything contrary or not based on a clear acceptance of the framework for implementing the 2009 agreement and NEEDS Assessment Report will be an imposition which will not be the solution to the present crisis.”

    The statement added that the agreements were well documented and could not be jettisoned under any guise.

    The UNJOS-ASUU urged President Goodluck Jonathan to follow the principles of the agreement to resolve the face-off, instead of applying high-handed tactics.

    It hailed ASUU’s national leadership for sticking to its guns on the strike.

     

     

  • ‘Fed Govt mustn’t reopen varsities without ASUU’

    Lagos lawyer Bamidele Aturu has advised the Federal Government against reopening the universities without reaching an agreement with the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU).

    He warned that any attempt to reopen the universities without any settlement with ASUU on the issues in dispute could result in student’ unrest in the country.

    Speaking with reporters in Lagos yesterday, the activist said the only solution to the impasse between the two parties is for the government to honour the agreement it had with the striking lecturers.

    “Anything contrary to that will not only compound the problem but lead to protest by the already-frustrated students. Did the government close the universities before? The universities were not closed by them so why talk about re-opening them without ASUU.

    “I believe that it is just a joke intended to put pressure on ASUU to call off the strike. But honestly, I don’t think that is the right thing to do. Because in the first place, the Federal Government didn’t close the universities, ASUU only withdrew their services.

    “If they open the universities without the lecturers, they will only create a basis for students’ unrest.

    “This is because when the students go back to their respective schools and there are no activities, they will only take to the streets in protest and that will not augur well for the Federal Government and the nation.”

     

  • Jonathan, ASUU move to resolve impasse

    Jonathan, ASUU move to resolve impasse

    President Goodluck Jonathan this afternoon maintained that  the protracted over four months’ old strike of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) would be resolved today.

    Jonathan, who took charge of the Federal Government’s  negotiations with the lecturers, gave the assurance while shaking hands with the lecturers just before the meeting commenced at the First Lady Conference Room in the Presidential Villa.

    Exchanging pleasantries with the team led by ASUU President, Dr. Nasir Isa Fagge, who were already seated with the Leadership of the Nigeria Labour Congress and Trade Union Congress, Jonathan said: “My president all the problems will be over today , all our children must go back to school”

    When greeting the NLC President, Comrade Abdulwahab Omar, President Jonathan said: “My president with you around today, there will be no problem, our agreement is signed, sealed and delivered.”

    On the Federal Government team include Vice President Namadi Sambo;  Minister of Labour, Chief Emeka Wogu; Supervising Minister of Education, Nyesom Wike; Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Sen. Anyim Pius Anyim; Executive Secretary of the National Universities Commission, Prof Julius Okogie; Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.

    Also with the Federal Government team are the Chief of Staff, Chief Mike Oghiadhome, and Permanent Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Education, Dr. Mac John Nwaobiala.

    Members of ASUU team at the meeting include its Vice President, Prof Biodun Ogunyemi, three past presidents of ASUU, Profs. Festus Iyayi, Dipo Fashina and Abdullahi Sule-Kano.

    Other members of ASUU delegation included Prof. Suleiman Abdul; Dr. Victor Igbum; Prof. Victor Osodeke.

    The ASUU negotiating team also have the NLC President, Comrade Abdulwahab Omah; the Trade Union President, Bobboi Kaigama in attendance.

    The Presidency, on September 19th, took over negotiations with the striking lecturers with the Vice-President Namadi Sambo spearheading the Federal Government side.

     

  • Strike: ASUU, Mark in marathon meeting

    Strike: ASUU, Mark in marathon meeting

    Senate President, David Mark and the Academic Staff Union of Universities, on Monday held over three hours meeting aimed at resolving the lingering strike by the union.

    The closed door meeting was said to be at the instance of Mark.

    It was held at Mark’s National Assembly office with ASUU President, Nasir Fagge and other top officials of the union in attendance.

    Though Mark declined comment at the end of the meeting, Fagge described the intervention of the Senate President in the strike as “a welcome development.”

    The Senate in plenary had last week mandated Mark to intervene in the over four months strike with a view to getting ASUU members back to the classrooms.

    Fagge told journalists that the Senate President invited them to brief him about the issues at stake

    He noted that Mark wanted to understand what the problems are

    Fagge said, “We have used the opportunity of our meeting to inform him what the problem is to enable him take appropriate step in the matter.

    “We robbed minds and we keep saying that every intervention to get this problem resolved and allow us to go back to our classes and teach the students will be acceptable to the union.

    “So the intervention by the Senate President is a welcome development but we will await the outcome of the intervention.”

    Asked whether the strike will be called off, the ASUU boss declined comment.

     

  • ASUU spokesman got it wrong

    I was quite bemused by the reference by ASUU spokesman, Dr. Olusegun Ajiboye, to my enjoyment of Duquesne University’s reputed Flex benefits for its members of academic and non-academic staff while denying similar benefits to ASUU members. First, in most instances, as its very name suggests, the Flex Benefits Program at Duquesne was flexible. It was also contributory. The university simply matched, up to a predetermined ratio, whatever amount had been contributed by the staff. For example, each faculty or staff made individual decision about how much he or she would contribute towards retirement, pension, life insurance etc.

    In my case, I contributed 12% of my salary towards retirement and pension but the university was obligated to contribute not more than six percent of my wages towards my retirement portfolios which had been divided by me into different mutual funds like Vanguard, Lincoln, Travelers and TIAA-CREF. At the same time, there were colleagues who contributed only 3, 4 or 5% of their wages towards retirement and thus enjoyed less than the maximum of 6% which the university was obligated to match. In accordance with the flexibility of the program, at no time did I contribute towards or enjoy the benefits of Duquesne University Health program. Likewise, whereas some colleagues at Duquesne paid over $1,000 per annum to park on campus, I neither paid for nor enjoyed the campus car park facility. After losing my protest to the university President that the parking charges were excessive, I simply bought a monthly bus pass; I rode public transportation to work. Doing this drastically reduced expenditure on car maintenance while still enabling me to get to and from work at a cost of less than half of what I would have been paying just to park.

    The flexibility in Duquesne University benefits program paled into insignificance when compared to the flexibility in salary structure. I joined Duquesne University employment with superlative credentials that aided my bargaining power in matters of salary. Indeed, I was the highest paid Assistant Professor in Duquesne University’s College of Liberal Arts which at the time included all Science as well as Arts Departments. God enabled me to enjoy such exceptional successes in grantsmanship that I was offered an assurance of at least a 10% annual salary increase for three years at a time when annual salary increase in the university averaged 3.5% and some faculty were given no increase at all! The university knew that I would take my service elsewhere if it failed to make attractive offers to retain me. The consequence of this was that by the time I became an Associate Professor, my salary had already outstripped those of my colleagues in the same Department. Even so, whatever I earned was far less than what an Assistant Professor was earning in the College of Pharmacy where a beginning Assistant Professor’s salary exceeded those of some full Professors in the College of Liberal Arts! It is noteworthy that when the stock market bubble got burst in the USA, with the concomitant reduction of university revenues, Duquesne University like many universities across the USA, froze salary increase for a few years! My wife is a Professor and chairperson at Roosevelt University, Chicago, Illinois, where salary and wages have been frozen for the last three years. Since Dr. Ajiboye admired Duquesne University Flex benefits program so much, would he canvass that ASUU adopt such flexibility rather than the current system where a Professor of Engineering at the University of Lagos enjoys similar salary structure as a Professor Religious Study at Ibadan and a Professor of History at Ile-Ife?

    There are five universities within a four mile radius of Duquesne University. One of these is Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) where I taught before moving to Duquesne. Each of these universities had salary, wages and benefits structure that were unique to its own institution. For example, CMU contributed a fixed percentage of a staff’s salary towards retirement regardless of whether or not the staff contributed. By contrast, Duquesne University contributed nothing towards the retirement funds of a staff or faculty who chose not to contribute. In any case, would ASUU embrace the disparity in salaries paid at Carnegie Mellon University versus Duquesne University?

    I took a 38% salary reduction when I moved from Carnegie Mellon University to Duquesne University. Such disparity is constitutive even among universities owned by the same state government. The University of Georgia in Athens, the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, the Georgia State University in Atlanta and the Georgia Southern University in Statesboro are owned and funded principally by the Government of the State of Georgia. Even so, there is significant disparity in the salary structures of these universities.

    At CMU, the saying that science is a bad concubine reflected the long hours that faculty spent in their laboratory sometimes at the expense of social and family life. However, all things being equal, those who spend long hours in their laboratory achieve enhanced research and scholarly productivity that results in timely or even accelerated promotion. Only in Nigeria would an academician demand overtime allowances under the euphemism of Excessive Work load Allowances. Such a demand would seem incongruous across the world.

    There is no question that the enormous rot in Nigeria’s education sector cries for urgent and immediate attention. But as unpopular as saying so might make me to the membership of ASUU, the truth is that ASUU has been a part of the problem. I would gladly love to engage Dr. Ajiboye in a prime time televised debate on my assertion.

    Now, even as I did during my contribution on the floor of the senate, let us direct our attention to some practical solutions to this most pressing national crisis.

    First, the National Assembly of Nigeria should henceforth appropriate at least 26% of Nigeria’s current revenue to education alone. Second, government in Nigeria, especially the Federal Ministry of Education, has been denigrated into a beast of burden. The metastasis of asphyxiating bureaucracy demands the streamlining of the endless parastatals that drain resources while making little or no contribution to national well-being and progress. Third, to raise revenue for funding a national redemption program in education, all imports should attract a mandatory education tax of one percent. Fourth, beginning from January 1, 2014 till December 31, 2018, all workers in Nigeria must contribute 5% of their income as education taxes. Embezzling any amount of these revenues targeted for education should be taken as an act of treason. This should attract the most severe penalty such as impeachment, imprisonment and perhaps death penalty. Fifth, the costs for running the offices of all elected and appointed political office holders should immediately be pruned by 50%. Something tells me that the implacable demands by ASUU are fuelled by resentment at the cult of obscene privileges which Nigerian politicians have become. But our task is to curb needless privileges rather than add to them.

    Finally, as a member of the Education Committee during my tenure in the House of Representatives and now as Vice Chairman of the Senate Education Committee, I have almost always been the strongest advocate for the well-being of Nigerian universities. At a senate hearing not long ago, a chieftain of the National University Commission disparagingly lampooned academic staff of Nigerian universities for depending too much on government rather than obtaining extramural funding as is the case abroad. I was the one who immediately and robustly came to the defence of the academicians. I explained that the comparison was in error for two reasons. First, well funded private grant agencies like Ford Foundation, Carnegie Foundation, Howard Hughes Foundation, etc do not exist in Nigeria. Second, it was egregiously incorrect to assert that most research grants in the USA came from outside government. I pointed out that the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the United States Department of Agriculture were federal government agencies which principally fund research in science, health, and agriculture, respectively. With the absence of such agencies in Nigeria, I submitted that it was unfair to blame the academicians.

    • Prof Adeyeye is vice chairman, Senate Committee on Education

  • FG’s ‘non-challant attitude’ will worsen ASUU strike -Don

    FG’s ‘non-challant attitude’ will worsen ASUU strike -Don

    The Provost of the College of Post Graduate Studies, Osun State University, Prof. Wasiu Alagbe Gbolagade, has decried what he called the non-challant attitude of the federal government to compel striking university lecturers go back to work.

    According to him, “this kind of attitude would not bring the strike to an end in good time.”

    Speaking with reporters in Osogbo, the Osun State capital, the university don said the gederal government’s “hard line position would rather make the situation in our universities worse.”

    The Professor of Computational Mathematics advised President Goodluck Jonathan to see reasons with the striking lecturers whom he said are concerned about ensuring that the standard of tertiary education in the country does not further decline.

    He said, “It is a pity that the present political class does not appreciate education and this is so because majority of them lack proper education. They are not educated. They only passed through the school system; the system itself did not pass through them. How do explain many of our leaders, particularly the president, who was a lecturer, not caring a bit about education and the future of the nation.”

     

  • ‘Jonathan politicised  ASUU strike’

    ‘Jonathan politicised ASUU strike’

    Dr. Nasir Fagge is President of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU). In this interview with our Deputy Editor, Nation’s Capital, YOMI ODUNUGA and Correspondent, GBENGA OMOKHUNU, he vowed that the lingering strike which has kept students at home for over four months will continue until government implements the 2009 agreement. Excerpts:

    IT was reported that you met with the Minister of Education and the government delegation on Tuesday. Does that mean an end in sight and students should be preparing to go back to the classrooms?

    We had a meeting with the minister on Tuesday. We reported back to the minister the outcome of the consultation with our members on the implementation of the 2009 agreement and the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of 2012. The response of our members is that it appears government is drawing us into renegotiating the 2009 agreement without implementing it. On the basis of that, our members said that we should report to government that they were not convinced it was seriously interested in implementing the agreement because what government has placed on the table fell far short of what is required to implement that agreement. In any case, our members consider what government has placed on the table as palliative. The conviction of our members is that it will be more important for government to implement, at least, the MoU which is the road map that government set for itself for the implementation of the 2009 agreement. So, on the basis of that understanding, our members said that nothing has really changed to warrant their reviewing the earlier position. That is what happened at Tuesday’s meeting and government said we will continue meeting, hoping that we will find a lasting solution to the crisis. On our part, we concluded that we are willing to continue the dialogue with government until we find a lasting solution. But it is clear that we have to go by the dictates of our members. ASUU is a union of intellectuals and we cherish internal democracy in the union.

    What is your reaction to the view expressed by some highly-placed people in government and concerned stakeholders that ASUU is asking for money that government cannot give out or source for?

    Point of correction, ASUU is not asking for money. Government said in 2012 that ‘I have this problem in implementing your agreement but this is how I am going to do it.’ Is that the same thing as asking for money? Two years later, government has not implemented the agreement as promised. What ASUU is simply saying is that government should respect its promise. I think we are not really asking for anything, nobody is making any fresh demand of government. We are just saying ‘you said you are going to do this please go ahead and do it.’ Our members are looking at what is happening. Government is saying when it comes to implementation of agreement relating to public education, there is no money to implement the agreement. But we have also seen recently that government is giving money to private enterprises. Let me give you an example; just last week it was all over the newspapers that the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) had given a lifeline of about N2.6 trillion to the banking sector. The banking sector is a private enterprise, owned by individuals who want to acquire wealth. These individuals will now ask us to come and keep our money with them as deposits and then ultimately they will go and squander our money. And we will still use public money to bail them out. Do you think that makes sense? In any case, we are sure of what is happening in most of our ministries where you find a minister spending huge resources belonging to the public on luxury vehicles that are not necessary. What government needs to do is talk with the same voice when it affects public institutions and private enterprises. That is the only way Nigerians will be convinced that yes there is no money. But when at this point government says there is no money and money is spent for another thing then that is contradiction. The Minister of Finance should stop deceiving people. We all know that there is money in this country.

    The National Assembly has expressed willingness to increase the budgetary provision in order to meet ASUU’s demand. Is that what you want?

    Even before we started this fight, we engaged the National Assembly committees on education on the need to implement the provisions of the MoU to ensure that we avert this crisis. At a point, the Senate Committee on Education chairman wanted to assist. The problem is that the responsibility of the National Assembly is to legislate. It is not their responsibility to act in an executive manner. So, if the National Assembly is saying we will do this and if the executive arm of government is not willing to do it, I want to assure you that it may end up not being done. It is not the first time that the National Assembly is coming in to say we will help in addressing this matter, but at the end of the day members of the National Assembly will meet and it will not be possible.

    Over the weeks, we have witnessed protests where some persons have called on ASUU to go back to class or face sanctions. How are you responding to the pressure?

    It’s a pity that the value of a lecturer has been made ridiculous in this country that students will now be the ones to give us ultimatum. When I was a student in the mid 80s, before our lecturers went on strike on a national policy issue it was the students that took to the street to protest. Unfortunately, the political class has destroyed the students’ union movement. What you see today are mercenaries. Our genuine students keep calling us every day and telling us not to suspend this action until we make sure that by the time we go back to school the problems would have been substantially resolved. The students are saying that the strike should go on until government implements the 2009 agreement. People are allowed to roam the streets of Abuja protesting, but when genuine students who want to protest against government come to protest the police will chase them. I got a report that the University of Abuja lecturers who came out to protest were stopped by the same Nigeria Police who allow all sorts of characters to organise rallies against ASUU. The police were there shooting teargas and all kinds of weapons at them. So there is a contradiction. One thing is important here. The police should also understand that the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria grants citizens the right to peaceful protest. We do not need to take any permission from the police to protest. If the police are doing this, then we are being civil because we are enlightened. Let us not be pushed to the wall because we are exercising our fundamental rights as it is in the constitution. If the police want to be truthful to their responsibility, then they ought to be fair to all as the Police Act does not permit them to segregate between the citizens of this country. If they are stopping ASUU members from protesting publicly and peacefully, they should also stop other people from doing the same. That is what we call equity. Under this circumstance we are going to challenge them.

    The President has equally accused ASUU of playing politics with the strike. With the way you have been dribbling the government, don’t you think he is right?

    Well, it is the presidency that introduced politics into this issue by bringing a politician in the person of the Governor of Benue State, Gabriel Suswam, who doesn’t really understand how the university system operates, to come and implement a very serious document relating to how we are going to revitalise the university system in this country. The first thing that Governor Suswam did upon assuming the responsibility of Chairman, Implementation Committee of the NEEDS Assessment Report, was to start reviewing the document. That document considers the whole university system, that is federal and state universities, and all the universities were visited. All the document did is to make sure that the problem of the rot and decay in these universities was collated and proposals were made on how we are going to address them. The costing was brought out and, as I said, universities are considered at par. But when Suswam came in, the first thing he did was to tell us that that we are going to single out two universities according to geo-political zones. He said we will avail President Goodluck Jonathan the opportunity to go round each geo-political zone to start projects of constructing hostel accommodation in at least one university per geo-political zone. So, between ASUU and government, who is introducing politics into this issue? How can ASUU be politicised? ASUU is a policy organisation and our members also have equal rights to belong to any political party in this country. So if we have members in all the political parties in the country, how can we have leaders that would align with a political party? Can we be that stupid? We cannot make that mistake. And to make matters worse, how can government be talking about politicisation when we are talking about implementing an agreement? If government wants to confirm that the moves by ASUU is politicised or not, let it implement the agreement and let us see if this strike will not be suspended. Why can’t government do what is right? Do we have to continue in this manner? Recently, the Minister of Finance said that some people were distributing pamphlets in mosques. These pamphlets were distributed in taxis, market places and mosques. Why did she single out mosques? Just to make the issue religious. Our union has gone beyond sentiments. The political class wants to continue taking Nigerians for a ride. We cannot allow that.

    A serving senator, who is a professor and former lecturer, expressed his displeasure with some aspects of the demands made by ASUU – especially the one on earned allowances – and also the agreement that lecturers should be paid for marking papers of postgraduate students. Don’t you think ASUU has crossed the line on this particular issue?

    The gentleman in question kept mentioning that he had worked outside the country. I think what he needs to do is to go and read the agreement. He is a professor and a professor has the capacity to read, analyse and understand. After doing that, he should come back and talk to Nigerians. The issue here is that when did we ever get a Nigerian or a foreigner for that matter in ministerial position resigning and coming to take up appointment in a Nigerian university? When did we ever get that? Unless they are sacked from their positions, if they cannot find another option, they go back to their university. But here in Nigeria we are witnesses to the fact that a sitting minister resigned his appointment and took up job as a professor in an American University because the conditions there were favourable. They are much better than what you see here as a minister. So if the professor wants to talk, let him not single out issues. Let him bring out everything and analyse and we will believe him then… unless his stay in the National Assembly has caused his brain to become rusty in such a way that he will find it difficult to undertake research. The entire document relating to the agreement is available. If he doesn’t have copies, let him liaise with us and we will make copies available to him. Most of these documents are on the website of ASUU; let him access it.

    Don’t you think this hard stance by ASUU will further affect the level of education in this county?

    We are convinced that what we are doing is going to address the problem. Look, our Ghanaian counterpart during the 70s and 80s had the same problem as we are having now and they took a resolution. We moved away from taking the same resolution which we called the ‘Ghanaian Option.’ They resolved to leave the university. They closed the universities and went away. ‘When government is ready we will come back.’ That is exactly what they did. Most of them that could get appointments outside Ghana did. Many of them came to Nigeria. After two years, the Ghanaian government realised that they really needed universities. They had a direction and they agreed on what they needed to do to re-open the universities. I think that was a wise decision because now Nigerians are migrating to Ghana for their university education and the capital flight out of this country is more than N60 billion per year. We do not even have to go to that extent. Let us see how we can push government to do what is right in addressing the problems of education. We, at a point, when the late Umaru Musa Yar’Adua was the president made a proposal to government that if our universities were turned around they had the capacity to generate much more revenue than we are getting from crude oil. We would be in a position to attract students from other countries.

    When next is ASUU meeting government?

    The government will reach out to ASUU when they are good and ready for anything.