Tag: atiku

  • Atiku deplores police harassment of Amaechi

    Atiku deplores police harassment of Amaechi

    Former vice president Atiku Abubakar has deplored the incessant police harassment of Governor Rotimi Amaechi of Rivers State, saying the situation has become incomprehensible, outrageous and humiliating.

    In a statement issued by his media office on Monday, Atiku said he was highly embarrassed by the excesses and open partisanship against a democratically elected governor who is also the chief security officer of the state.

    He called on the police in Rivers State to halt their siege against the new Peoples Democratic Party headquarters in Abuja, which has entered its second week.

    “Nothing justifies the advocacy for the decentralization of the police by allowing states to set up their own more than this.

    “There is nowhere in the world the police would take sides in private political conflicts at the expense of its constitutional role,” the statement added.

    The former vice president regretted that the persistent harassment of the governor has gone too far to be tolerated by decent public opinion and other leaders.

    The glaring partisanship of the police, Atiku argued would continue to elicit agitation for state police by the Nigerian people.

    “Police partisanship must stop immediately because it poses a threat to our nascent democracy. Our police force must concentrate solely on providing safety and security for Nigerians who face daily threats of violence and kidnappings.

    “Nigeria continues to head in the wrong direction. We face chronic joblessness and now a crippling, three-month long ASUU strike preventing students from attending school. That is where the Federal Government’s focus must be, not on launching partisan police actions,” Atiku stated.

    He also noted that, considering the heavy expenditure state governments make to equip and support the police, the harassment of Amaechi could undermine such cooperation.

     

     

     

  • PDP factions, NGF, Atiku, mourn Agagu

    PDP factions, NGF, Atiku, mourn Agagu

    The Bamanga Tukur-led Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the Abubakar Baraje’s New PDP, the Nigerian Governors’ Forum (NGF) and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar have joined other notable Nigerians to express shock over the death of a former Governor of Ondo State, Dr. Olusegun Agagu.

    In a condolence message by the National Publicity Secretary of the Tukur- led PDP, Chief Olisa Metuh, the party described the late Agagu as a patriot and a brilliant technocrat who discharged his responsibilities both as minister and governor with finesse.

    “His patriotic and knowledgeable personality was outstandingly expressed as minister and governor. We wish to put on record, his pioneer contributions to the groundwork of the current power reforms of the federal government.

    “On behalf of the National Chairman of our great party, Dr. Bamaga Tukur, we send our sincere condolences to his immediate family and to the government and people of Ondo State. May he find rest in the bosom of the Lord”, Metuh added.

    Also, a statement by the National Secretary of the Baraje-led PDP, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, yesterday described Agagu as a committed, reliable, honest politician and an idealist.

    ‘’He was always committed to his chosen goals and agenda to a fault and was a blunt and consistent personality who was always prepared to shoulder responsibilities, particularly concerning those related to development and progress of our dear country.

    “The news of Agagu’s sudden exit sounded rather incredible considering the fact that Chief Agagu was a committed, reliable and honest politician and credible idealist who never left anyone as to which side he belonged in any political divide.

    “Chief Agagu was an elder brother whose wise counsel proved very useful at the decision-making level in the South-West chapter of the PDP during our relatively short but eventful political relationship.

    “As a minister in the cabinet of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, Agagu will be credited with contributing phenomenally to the revitalisation of the power sector during his tenure as Minister of Power and Steel”, Oyinlola stated.

    The NGF described the late Agagu an excellent family man, a consummate politician, an academic and elder statesman.

    A statement by the chairman of the Forum, Governor Rotimi Amaechi of Rivers State, regretted that the former governor died at a time the country needed his invaluable service most.

    Amaechi said: “Dr. Agagu’s departure is deeply painful. But we take solace in the fact that he lived and died well. He dedicated his life to serving his people and country. We are especially proud that the former governor lived an exemplary life worthy of emulation.

    “Although, we cannot but grief over the death of this public spirited community man, we are sure that Dr. Agagu will long be remembered as a diligent, humble, patriotic, honest and philanthropic community organizer and leader.

    “We commiserate with his family, friends and associates, the people and government of Ondo and Nigerians in general, and pray God to give us all the fortitude to bear this great loss.”

    Atiku Abubakar described the late former governor as a consummate politician who would be missed for his sagacity and skilfulness both in politics and public administration.

    In a message by his Media Adviser, Garba Shehu, the former vice president noted that Agagu’s death came with a personal pain to him because he was a friend, and a brilliant strategist.

    “Agagu not only sat eminently among politicians of note in the country, his contribution to Geology, his area of specialisation is also very impressive.

    “Be it in politics, scholarly undertakings or public administration, the late Governor Agagu was a first class material. I will miss him as a friend, but the country will miss him as a worthy citizen and leader.”

  • Obasanjo attacks Atiku

    Obasanjo attacks Atiku

    Ex-president accuses his deputy of corruption

    Aide: Atiku will reply

    Waziri denies Ibori link

     

    AFTER a long break, former President Olusegun Obasanjo and his deputy, Atiku Abubakar, seem set to renew their hostilities.

    Obasanjo is insinuating that ex-Vice President Atiku is corrupt, saying he was investigated by his administration following alert from the United States.

    He said Nigerians should ask Atiku why he has not visited the United States since he left office, if he has no case to answer.

    Obasanjo, who bared his mind on why he moved against his deputy in an interview with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) magazine, Zero Tolerance, said he could not understand why the anti-graft commission has not taken Atiku to court.

    He said he did not at any time instigate former EFCC Chairman Nuhu Ribadu against Atiku.

    Obasanjo said: “Ask Ribadu, if I ever say to him, ‘go do this’.

    “No; that is not true. We got a letter from America in June 2006, listing a number of people to be investigated; Atiku was one of them and that letter went straight to the EFCC.

    “It was just shown to me because they will not be able to investigate my number two without my saying ‘ok’. So, I said if we got this letter from America, so be it.

    “If we have agreement with FBI, Metropolitan Police and they are helping us and we are helping them and they write to us and say these are the people we want you to help us investigate, what do you think we should do? You as EFCC, what will you do, coincidence or no coincidence?”

    He said Atiku had refused to travel to the United States since he left office because of alleged corruption.

    He went on: “Well, I don’t know what the EFCC has found out about him, but I don’t know if he can go to America. Do you know? I am asking you, do you know?

    “He travels? Travels to where? To Dubai? Let him go to America and return to Nigeria.

    “Well, I don’t know what the EFCC has found out about him, but I don’t know if he can go to America. Do you know? I am asking you, do you know?”

    But Atiku could not be reached last night for his reaction. He was away in China.

    His Media Adviser, Mallam Garba Shehu, said: “Turaki (Atiku) is in China and the time difference is about eight hours. There is no way I could reach him. You can run your story, we will react later. Turaki will wish to personally react,” he said.

    The ex-President insisted that Ribadu was not his attack dog.

    “He is an attack dog to those people who have run foul of the law, people like (former Vice President) Atiku! He is an attack dog to take down Tafa Balogun, my own Inspector General of Police? Is that what you call attack dog?”

    He denied influencing a report of the EFCC which led to the exclusion of some politicians from the 2007 election.

    Obasanjo said: “No, no. Yes!. He brought a report to me and said these people are corrupt; how can I in my position receive a report that says these people are corrupt, and then I say ‘extol him as a governor’. Is that the type of leader you want me to be? I will not be that. So he brought a report; I didn’t ask him to carry out an investigation; he even came out and said he had found 28 governors as corrupt.

    He said EFCC under Ribadu investigated him while in office to prove that nobody should be below board in the fight against corruption.

    He said: “I was investigated. I told the EFCC to investigate me. I told EFCC to carry out a clinical investigation and they did it. They also did same with all the people on my farm. One of them was telling me the other day how Lamorde called him three times and took statements from him.

    “The EFCC even made sure that they did not submit that report to me; they waited until I left and updated their report after going round the world and saying ‘look; this is the report’. Nobody should be below board in the fight against corruption.”

    Obasanjo, however, became angry when he was asked why EFCC never moved against a former Chairman of the Nigeria Ports Authority (NPA) Chief Olabode George, until when the latter fell out of favour with him.

    He added: “No, no, no; don’t say a thing like that; that is a stupid statement. I take very strong exception to that and if you are from EFCC and you say that, I think you should be removed and I mean it.

    “Ribadu brought a report and a blanket report to us and we said, ‘look, if there is something wrong with NPA, you don’t crucify 50 people, go and get the leaders’ and, eventually, he got the leaders and the leaders happen to be the chairman, the Chief Executive who is from Kano and they were charged and they went to jail. And it is in the same report of Ribadu; now, if Ribadu is no longer there and you want to run him down, it should not be from you and I will not run him down.”

    “I will say where I think Ribadu has gone wrong but where he is right, and he lifted that organisation, it should be acknowledged.

    “He did very well until he lost his direction when he left. He did so well that he became a threat even to the incoming administration; that is what happened. He was so successful that his success began to be a problem for him.”

    Although Obasanjo avoided rating Ribadu, he faulted the appointment of his successor, Mrs. Farida Waziri as the chairman of EFCC.

    He alleged that Mrs. Waziri, was head-hunted by ex-Governor James Ibori and should not have been given the appointment. Mrs. Waziri defended this several time, says it was false.

    He added: “I don’t know how to score him. I know that the woman they brought to replace Ribadu (Farida Waziri) was not the right person for that job, because I understood that one of those who head-hunted her was James Ibori. If James Ibori, who is now in a United Kingdom (UK) prison for fraud, head-hunted somebody who will fight corruption in Nigeria, then you can understand what happened.

    “ Well, go and look at her track record, go and look at the condition or the qualification, go and look at the type of interaction that anybody holding that job will have with a similar organisation elsewhere; did Waziri have that type? What connection did she have with FBI; what relationship did she have with Metropolitan Police in London; what did she know. It is not a picnic! While Ribadu was doing it, he was doing it with all his ability and I believe he did it well.”

    He said he would reappoint Ribadu if he has the opportunity.

    “Yes, I will reappoint Mallam Ribadu and I will not dismiss him the way he was dismissed from EFCC and one thing I will tell him, I will advise him not to go and hobnob with people he had declared as corrupt. Hobnobbing with such people does not do much credit to his image.”

    Responding to a question, Obasanjo explained why he had been critical of the Federal Government’s fight against corruption.

    He said political will is required to fight corruption in Nigeria.

    But when asked whether the nation still has the political will, the ex-President simply responded: “Go and ask your president, not me.

    “Political will is the courage, ability, the audacity to do what is right and most of what is right will not be pleasant.”

    He added: “I feel concerned about Nigeria and I will never stop feeling concerned and that is why occasionally I speak up.

    “Even now, I am speaking up to say that all of you in EFCC, there are areas you should be ashamed of yourselves. If you take an organisation which took Nigeria from level 2 to level 43 and then it start coming down to level 34 then something is wrong. You don’t come and blame that on me; you don’t come and ask me that.”

     

  • Ex-militants  to ACF: no peace for Atiku

    Ex-militants to ACF: no peace for Atiku

    •Post-convention dinner a waste of money, says Baraje

    Ex-militants in the Niger Delta have told the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) and the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) that there will be no peace for former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar until he leaves President Goodluck Jonathan alone.

    The former freedom fighters, led by ‘General’ Reuben Wilson, declared Atiku persona-non-grata in the Niger Delta, for being opposed to Jonathan’s re-election in 2015 and being behind the New Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    Wilson, who is the leader of the Leadership, Peace and Cultural Development Initiative (LPCDI), spoke yesterday in Port Harcourt.

    The ex-militants said: “The ACF should warn the former vice-president (Atiku) to leave President Jonathan alone, so that he can concentrate on issues of governance.

    “As long as Atiku is not relenting in the fight to chase President Jonathan out of office in 2015, he will not know peace; neither will the security of his investments in the Niger Delta region.

    “The ACF leaders are a bundle of jokers, who are playing with fire. If the ACF members so like Atiku, let them advise him and other power-hungry northern elements to leave President Jonathan alone.

    “President Jonathan has been in office for just two years and they (ACF leaders) have done everything possible to make sure he does not concentrate on development issues. The ACF should not provoke us.

    “Where were they when their son, Muhammadu Buhari, promised hell for Jonathan? All this while that the Boko Haram warlords have been killing and maiming our people in the North, where was the ACF?

    “Why have they not called Kawu Baraje and Atiku to order? Why can’t they talk to their own children to leave President Jonathan alone?

    “The likes of Atiku may be working hard to divide this country. The ACF leaders may have closed their eyes to the devilish acts of their Boko Haram brothers. But this country will remain together and Dr. Jonathan will be re-elected in 2015.

    “Your Boko Haram people have not allowed President Jonathan to remain focused. Your northern brothers, who believe that the Presidency is their birthright, are doing all they can to distract him and they expect us to keep quiet. When the North held sway for over three decades, they had the support of the South.

    “If there are people that should be angry, it should be the former freedom fighters, who have not benefited from the Federal Government, especially as the lifeline which the late President Umaru Yar’Adua promised us before we decided to surrender our arms, has not been provided.

    “Jomo Gbomo is a pseudo name used by MEND fighters while in the creeks. We challenge him to come out publicly for people to see him.

    “Jomo Gbomo is not in existence as a human being and could not have spoken against our stance on the political developments in the country, especially on the decision to ban Atiku Abubakar from visiting any part of the Niger Delta.

    “Rather than continually insulting and condemning President Jonathan, the northern politicians should be bold enough to tell Nigerians what they consider to be the sins of the focused President.”

    The Abubakar Baraje-led faction of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has explained the absence of its members from the post-convention dinner of the party.

    A statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Chief Eze Chukwuemeka Eze, said: “As a serious group, we cannot be a party to such squandermania while Nigerian masses are wallowing in abject poverty and our children kept at home instead of being in school because the Federal Government could not meet ASUU’s demands.

    “We wish to have nothing to do with such wasting of public funds and such trivialities associated with Alhaji Bamanga Tukur and his leadership – which explains why he must be kicked out of the National Secretariat of the party.

    “We cannot be a party to such a gathering while the PDP family is facing serious crisis that if not checked would dim the party’s chances of winning future elections.”

    He praised members of the faction from Bayelsa State.

    The statement warned the Bamanga Tukur-led faction of the PDP to stop threatening to suspend or expel “governors and members of the National Assembly who are indentifying with the true leadership of PDP under Alhaji Abubakar Kawu Baraje”.

    Eze also condemned the abuses being heaped on former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar “just because he has decided to identify with our campaign for justice in the PDP of which he was a leading founding father and was instrumental to the payment of both the staff salaries of those working at the National Headquarters of the party and paid the rent for the National Secretariat in which some of these funny elements are currently operating from for three good years!”

    He said it was wrong for the Tukur group to call Governor Chibuike Amaechi of a traitor because he has been “standing firm to his rights and likewise most of our people that have stuck out their heads to restore the party to the path of honour and democratic tenants.”

     

     

     

     

  • Before the PDP self-destruct

    Before the PDP self-destruct

    As Nigeria’s politics continue to take shape ahead of the 2015 elections, the leadership deficit of the PDP came to the fore once again with a festering crisis tearing the party apart.

    Spirited attempts by former heads of state, and the incumbent President to reconcile the warring factions have so far fallen on deaf ears. The ruling party is like a time bomb, doomed for implosion! The sad reality of plunging the nation into avoidable political crisis stare us in the face as the party’s predilection to press the self-destruct button is rather habitual.

    The party exhibited its favourite pastime — dancing naked in public — this time at the Eagles Square, venue of the Mini Convention, where aggrieved members of the PDP stormed out to form a parallel faction now known as the ‘new PDP’.

    Members of the faction including notable governors from the north, joined by their counterparts from Rivers and Kwara states, led by former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, with Abubakar Baraje as Chairman. There was another drama as aggrieved members of factions in Anambra state PDP resorted to fisticuffs to press home their grievances.

    Such disregard for decency and decorum has become the hallmark of the party. The continuous existence of the party might be a mirage when viewed against the backdrop of its inability to justify its existence for 14 harrowing years other than plundering the nation’s resources. It is derisory that the party still thinks it can railroad voters in 2015 into its conquistadorial mission.

    The subversion of democratic principles to the whims and caprices of the party’s hierarchy is fast becoming the norm in the PDP. The job of taking Nigeria out of the abyss unto the path of prosperity, it does seem, we cannot continue to entrust into the hands of such mendacious, unrepentant and rapacious rascals, donning the garb of democrats.

    2015 will come upon us like a thief in the night, we must begin to be wary of self-seeking power grapping politicians who have failed the acid test of demonstrable leadership capacity. Their ability to make rational decisions is in doubt much as the lip service they pay to the vaunted transformation agenda of the present administration is evident in the dwindling fortunes of all sectors of the Nigerian economy.

    The recent squabble came as good news to many Nigerians who see the PDP as a monster that has colluded with the ruling elite for over a decade to loot the treasury, institutionalise corruption and ensure that Nigerians remain in perpetual captivity. That the party has survived series of crisis not occasioned by mass defection is largely due to the lack of a formidable opposition. As the APC, Atiku’s PDM, VOP – rumoured to be backed by the aggrieved governors in the ‘new PDP’ – are fast changing the political landscape, sooner rather than later, we shall witness a mass exodus of dissenting PDP members.

    Bamanga Tukur’s tenure as the PDP chairman has been nothing short of calamity on the party that pontificates as the largest party in Africa, as if political parties are defined and identified by size alone. At a time when the political minefield is being reshaped with APC and others, it is expected that Tukur would not push his game too far as the party continue to totter precariously on the brink of disaster. So far, he has failed to show tact, diplomacy and political savvy in dealing with the challenges that a party of strange bedfellows like the PDP pose.

    The ruling party, as always, downplays crisis rocking the party as one that should be expected in any large family. Some like Nysome Wike, go to such nit-witted extent to show their political naivety by saying political crisis “beautify democracy”.

    Sadly, the perpetual wrangling in the ruling party has nothing to do with Nigerians; it is not about policies, or issues that border on how to move the state forward, or how to build institutions, create jobs and develop infrastructure to improve the lives of the populace but instead it is how to massage their already over bloated egos and further their selfish ambition.

    More worrisome is the deployment of state resources and apparatus to fight perceived enemies. The current in-fighting and political skimming the PDP is enmeshed is nothing but jostling for 2015 elections. A truly democratic party will not estrange members for aspiring to any political office. Such actions are not only antithetical to every known democratic tenet but tyrannical.

    The split must have come as cheery news for the main opposition party, APC. How prepared they are to cash in on the PDP break-up and woo the aggrieved gladiators to their camp remains to be seen. It is not a co-incidence that since the APC was formed the party at the centre has never known peace. Now, the ruling party seems to be on the path to perdition.

    There’s no gainsaying the fact that the PDP has been sitting on a keg of gun powder for much of the time. The leadership of the party has completely ignored calls over the years to deepen democracy by eschewing factional politics, instilling discipline and ensuring a level playing ground for all members. Matter of fact, the party needs a reform, not just reconcile aggrieved members, if it is to wriggle itself out of the snarl it is currently mired.

    Past failure in putting its house in order culminated in the official rascality and uncivilised manner party members conducted themselves at the convention, a testament to the poor rating of the PDP’s leadership capacity.

    Political observers have surmised that the ‘Old PDP’ is headed for the rocks. The Baraje faction is taking their time to garner more members, goodwill from the public and ultimately, destroy the PDP, before finally making deft political moves to the new parties: PDM, VOP or the APC.

    Mr President’s desire to run for 2015 at all cost against the wishes of aggrieved governors, and his quest to have a firm grip of the party’s machinery, by launching a counter attack to whittle down the influence of those opposed to his ambition, coupled with the wind of the opposition, is what is tearing the umbrella to shreds today. The president’s foot soldiers are ready for a showdown with the ‘new PDP’.

    Without a clear cut policy direction, the continuous existence and dominance of such a party will mean total ruination of all the attractions, stimulation or semblance of democratic principles that has given Nigerians hope in governance. The reality of the situation is, the party is already headed towards destruction. The death knell is sounding loud and clear. Nigerians must rise up to bail the country from the firm grip of the PDP powers that be have plundered the resources of the country in a mafia-like circus.

    The war of words between the Tukur and Baraje factions is bound to leave a bad impression on the minds of Nigerians. The PDP wittingly or unwittingly is nursing a dangerous death wish. The party behaves as if it has no opposition which can capitalise on its monumental weaknesses, or they assume that whatever their weakness, they can still capture power in 2015 and it seems every action of government is now deliberately intended to intimidate opposition, within and outside the party, against President Jonathan’s pesky 2015 ambition. This perception from the public can erase whatever good luck is left in Jonathan or any PDP politician for that matter. Such negative politics that elevates party chaos with its attendant reconciliation process with tax payer’s money over governance must henceforth be put on the back burner.

    The writer can be reached via: theophilus@ilevbare.com, http://ilevbare.com, twitter: @tilevbare

  • Atiku to police: stay off partisan politics

    Atiku to police: stay off partisan politics

    •Pro-chancellor to ex-vice president, others: leave PDP alone

    Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has urged the police to stay off partisan politics.

    A statement by his media office yesterday urged the Inspector-General of Police Mohammed Abubakar to order his men to vacate the secretariat of the new Peoples Democratic Party (PDP.

    He said the police invasion of the party’s office has no justification in law, but was rather borne out of political control.

    The statement reads: “While it is embarrassing that the police have yet to give a reason why they are laying siege to a political party office, the whole world knows these are acts prompted by unscrupulous politicians who do not even have the moral conscience not to involve the police in politics.

    “This goes to the root of the current crisis within the PDP. What does it say to our citizens, who live daily with the fear of violence and kidnappings, that our police priority is raiding a political party office.

    “I call on the leadership of the Nigerian Police, especially its Inspector General, to steer clear of political entanglements and immediately vacate our party offices. Our national law enforcement priority must be the safety and security of Nigerians, not politics.

    “A politically partisan police force sets a dangerous precedent, as they will be entrusted to supervise free and fair elections in the future.”

    The Chairman of the Governing Council/Pro-Chancellor, Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO), Dr. Emmanuel Enemuo, urged former Vice- President Atiku Abubakar and the seven governors loyal to the new Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to quit.

    Enemuo, who spoke to reporters in Abuja yesterday, said the position of the ‘New PDP’ that PDP National Chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur must be removed for peace to reign was undemocratic.

    He said: “My own take on the matter is this: if they no longer want to be in PDP, let them go, form their own party and meet PDP at the polling ground. If they want to pick their presidential candidate, let them go and nominate him and let him come for the general election.”

    He said the bid to oust Tukur was aimed at checkmating President Goodluck Jonathan’s 2015 bid.

    Enemuo said: “They are now telling Jonathan that ‘look, you remove Tukur and we’re still with you’. The target is Jonathan himself. I know that. The target is the presidential ticket of PDP. If Jonathan decides to run-and I hope he decides to run because he is one of the best things to have happened to this country- none of them has a chance.”

    The PDP chieftain in Anambra State said Tukur was not a dictator.

    “Before he assumed office, what happened in PDP was that the National Chairman would have his own candidate, National Secretary his own, and so on. But now, everything has been reduced to level-playing field. They don’t like it.”

    On the ongoing university teachers strike, he urged the Academic Staff Union off Universities (ASUU) to call off the strike.

  • 2015: What is Atiku up to?

    2015: What is Atiku up to?

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar is on the prowl. Can he sustain the onslaught against the mainstream Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and ride to the Presidency on the back of the crisis tearing apart the ruling party? Group Political Editor EMMANUEL OLADESU revisits Atiku’s metamorphosis and the prospects and constraints of his struggle for presidential power. 

    Since the Turaki Adamawa, Alhaji Atiku Abubakr, placed his hand on the political plough, he has not looked back. The former vice president has remained a major factor. From his lip, stories of triumphs and turbulence on the sliding political field ooze out. For him, life has not been a bed of roses. It has been full of ups and downs. But throughout his sojourn in politics, he has been a consummate politician, great mobiliser, master strategist and crowd puller.

    Atiku is today perceived as the arrowhead of the opposition in the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). He rode to that status of an internal opposition leader on the back of President Goodluck Jonathan’s abysmal performance in office and Alhaji Bamanga Tukur’s over-bearing posture as the national chairman. But his presidential ambition is also common knowledge. Thus, critics point out that Atiku is gathering forces, ahead of 2015.

    His ambition to rule the country ambition had hit the rock four times. In the aborted Third Republic, he was projected by his mentor, the late General Sheu Yar’Adua, the founder of the Peoples Democratic Movement (PDM). That was when the Military leader, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida (rtd), excluded him and other key politicians from the race. At the Jos convention of the proscribed Social Democratic Party (SDP), he stepped down for the late Chief Moshood Abiola, who emerged as the flag bearer.

    In 2003, many governors served as campaign managers for Atiku. They believed that, if he contested, he would beat his boss, Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo, (rtd), thereby saving them from persistent persecution. But the former Vice President failed to seize the moment. At midnight, he directed his supporters, who were in the majority, to endorse Obasanjo,

    In 2007, he tried his luck again. He was more determined. However, some circumstances forced him to defect from the PDP to the defunct Action Congress (AC), where he contested as the sole aspirant. But he was defeated in the severely flawed presidential election by the late Alhaji Umaru Yar’ Adua, the younger brother of his deceased leader, Gen. Yar’ Adua.

    Also, in 2011, Atiku picked up the gauntlet. He was on the firing line again. After returning to the PDP, he entered the ring with President Goodluck Jonathan, who was deputy governor of Bayelsa State, when he was the number two citizen. At the regional level, he beat General Babangida (rtd) at the screening organised for the Northern aspirants. But the regional support collapsed at the Eagles Squares, Abuja, during the subsequent presidential primaries. Unlike 2003, when he was the man to beat, he had become a big elephant who lacked the speed of a lion. He lost to Dr. Jonathan, who wielded the power of incumbency.

    To discerning observers, the former Vice President is on the offensive again. Sources said that he is putting his hat in the race at a critical point in national history. Democracy is on the edge and the President’s poor performance has compelled critics to make a case for genuine transformational leader. The North is agitating for power shift, based on an inexplicable agreement on presidential zoning between President Jonathan and few Northern leaders, who are yet to be known. The ruling party is in turmoil, torn apart by acrimony, intrigues, politics of exclusion and power game, ahead of the next elections.

    The civil war in the PDP, according to analysts, is not an ideological war. It is an extreme self-seeking war being fought with a missionary zeal by the antagonistic gladiators to halt their imminent slide into political oblivion. Since Tukur became the chairman, the party has not had a moment of respite. As the ally and staunch supporter of the President, he is perceived as a foe by forces plotting to abort his second term ambition. The chairman, who may have been acting the presidential script, has tighten the noose against the President’s perceived enemies in the party.

    However, when the party split at its recent rancorous national convention in Abuja, another opportunity opened for Atiku. The former Vice President, seven governors and other aggrieved chieftains were united by their hostility to the President and national chairman over the alleged irregularities that marred the national congress. Up came Atiku as the arrowhead of the Kawu Baraje’s faction of the PDP. Reminiscent of the manner he successfully led the anti-third term campaign, Atiku has been firing salvos at the PDP leadership, accusing it of dictatorship, violation of the party constitution and lack of democratic credential.

    During the planning for the convention, his supporters have transformed the PDM into a political party. Confronted with the allegation of anti-party activities, he defended himself, clarifying that, although his supporters formed the party, he is still a chieftain of the PDP. Many PDP stalwarts were not convinced by the explanation. The PDM national chairman, Bashir Yusuf, is a close associate and campaign manager for Atiku Campaign Organisation. The PDP Board of Trustees (BoT) Chairman, Chief Tony Anenih, a founding member of the PDP, cried foul, saying that Atiku could not single handedly transformed the political group into a political party without wide consultation and collective endorsement of the surviving members.

    Many agree that Atiku is always adorning his thinking cap. The Adamawa politician has always stayed glued to the drawing board. Like his boss, he has the reputation for anticipating challenges problem-solving. However, some of his associates believe that he had taken some steps in the past that cast doubt on his right judgment. This, they also point out, may be the only difference between him and Gen. Yar’Adua.

    Atiku was one of the disciples of the great political wizard, strategist and mobiliser, Yar’Adua, son of the late Alhaji Musa Yar’Adua, former Minister of Lagos Affairs. Yar’Adua had served briefly as the Federal Commissioner for Transport before he became the Chief of Staff, Supreme Headquarters in Obasanjo Administration. Atiku, the political son of the Tafida Katsina became the inheritor and beneficiary of the solid political machinery, PDM, the most outstanding and enduring political cult in the country. His main goal is to be enthroned in the nation’s apex political life. For him, there is no alternative path to self-actualisation. For seven years, that is, between 1999 and 2006, he was bidding for his time. His followers perceived him as the man of the future. But when that future came, certain circumstances made the realisation of the goal much more elusive.

    Atiku was at daggers drawn with Obasanjo, who occupied a position of strength as a President with power of incumbency. If he had seized the storm in 2003, when it was evident that he had the support of the governors, who controlled the party structures and the bulk of delegates, the story would have been different. Former Governors James Ibori of Delta State, and his Abia and Adamawa counterparts, Dr. Orji Kalu and Alhaji Boni Haruna, who were in regular contact with other governors, waited endlessly for a directive from the former Vice President to swing the pendulum of victory towards his direction. Obasanjo came down from his Olympian height to prostrate for Atiku to let him secure the ticket. Atiku gave his nod. That inaction and error of judgment became his undoing.

    Without parading a chain of degrees from reputable universities, Atiku, the quintessential custom officer, reached the top of his career before he retired as a Deputy Director of Customs. He had built a network across the country, cutting across the entrenched aristocrats, traditional rulers, and political class. But whether he can reenact the political feats of Yar’Adua is a subject of debate.

    The late Gen. Yar’Adua had three legacies. His organisational wizardry was legendary. He was able to gather and sustain a lot of ambitious politicians under the same roof, with the sole motive of acquiring power. Even the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, the founder of the Action Group (AG) and Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN), could not penetrate all the geo-political zones. Indisputably, for many years, Yar’Adua’s PDM has retained its national outlook and refused to be overtaken by the tremors of time.

    Also, when the members of the PDP found themselves in different parties, the bond of unity was not severed. From time to time, they have remained conscious of their political root. What seems to have made the PDM to fill the public consciousness is that the group is not rebellious to progressive and welfarist politics.

    From the onset, Etiku was an integral member of the PDM kitchen cabinet, a dependable ally of Yar’Adua and confidant at the birth of the Peoples Front of Nigeria (PFN). He was not in the dark when it was resolved that the political machinery should join the defunct SDP, one of the two parties decreed into existence by Babangida. In fact, Yar’Adua was already on the fast lane to the Aso Rock when the presidential primaries was truncated by the military. At that time, the banning and unbanning of politicians characterised the dubious transition programme.

    Yar’Adua was instrumental to the rise of Alhaji Baba Gana Kingibe. But he later fell out with the seasoned diplomat. The late General was never taken unawares. He was an exponent of “Plan B”. He saw the handwriting on the wall. Therefore, he decided to groom Atiku, his loyal associate, for the number one job. Thus, after he was banned from the race, he prepared Atiku for the contest. He faced Kingibe and Abiola at the Jos Convention. In those days, the embattled politicians were involved in a lot of horse trading. To defeat Kingibe, Atiku was asked to step down for Abiola at the shadow poll.

    But deep gulf later ensued between the Tafida Katsina and Aare Ona Kankanfo of Yorubaland. The bone of contention was Abiola’s refusal to accept Atiku as his running mate, contrary to Yar’Adua’s calculation. The 14 SDP state chairmen made it impossible by throwing their weight behind Kingibe. The loss of the two slots-Presidency and Vice Presidency-pained Yar’Adua to the marrows. The only option left for him was to gain the control of the party by mustering strength to install Chief Tony Anenih as the SDP national chairman. It is an irony of political life that both Anenih and Atiku, who harmoniously defended the PDP’s interest at that time now divided by the power games of the post-Yar’Adua period.

    After the annulment of the history 1993 presidential election, politicians were in disarray. Yar’Adua wanted to bounce back. Atiku was part of that scramble for power as a member of the PDM in the 1994 constitutional conference set up by the late Head of State, Gen. Sani Abacha. Along with Yar’Adua, he pursued the goal of setting a disengagement day for the military. Yar’Adua later died in mysterious circumstances in the prison, following his conviction over a phantom coup. After his demise, the bereaved PDM members started to look up to Atiku, the successor to the vacant stool of his mentor.

    When Abacha died, the members of the PDM decided to participate in the transition programme of Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar. The group became the engine room and most formidable caucus in the PDP. It parading seasoned politicians, including Chief Sunday Afolabi, Chief Anenih, Prof. Ango Abdullahi, Senator Jibril Martins-Kuye, Alhaji Lawal kaita, Chief dapo Sarunmi, Chief Olorunfunmi Basorun, Chief Yomi Edu, Senator Rashidi Ladoja, Senator Tony Adefuye, Mrs. Onikepo Oshodi, Mrs. Titilayo Ajanaku, and Alhaji Abubakar Rimi.

    In 1999, Atiku dumped his presidential ambition. When he vied in 1993, it was not his personal ambition. It was Yar’Adua’s ambition in disguise. He returned to Adamawa and emerged as the governor-elect. Obasanjo, the President-elect, was just floating in the PDP. He had no root. He emerged based on three factors. The North had reluctantly conceded the Presidency to the Southwest. Some Northern elements believed that, when he was the military Head of State, he did not work against the interest of the region. Also, the military wanted to remain as a factor and power broker. No other Yoruba man could be trusted, since Chief Olu Falae refused to join the PDP.

    Obasanjo did not have any blue-print. He had no premonition of his recall for higher service. He was the candidate of the people that wanted to fill the gap. The PDM members-Atiku, Afolabi, Sarunmi and Edu-were part of the numerous delegations asking him to return to power. Obasanjo had a nightmare selecting a running mate. Four names were presented to him-Rimi, Bamanga Tukur, Prof. Abdullahi and Atiku. He settled for Atiku because of the PDM’s influence.

    As the Vice President, Atiku was the de facto President. He was the Controlling Minister of the Economy. To get things done, politicians and others must pass through Atiku route. A former minister, who alerted the President to the danger of allowing his deputy to have sweeping powers, was sacked from the cabinet. The Vice President was also acutely popular among the majority of the governors. Thus, in 2003, many of them urged him to displace Obasanjo. The President was sweating profusely at the primaries. He prostrated before Atiku before earning re-nomination. At that point too, Atiku ceased to be the apple of Obasanjo’s eye.

    The Vice President was accused of corruption and disloyalty. He became a nominal figure in the government with no duties to perform. It was clear that he would not be allowed to participate in a free and fair primaries in the PDP. The government even made frantic efforts to halt his presidential ambition in another party, but Atiku ran to the court for security and survival. He became the arrowhead of the opposition as the presidential candidate of the defunct Action Congress (AC) in 2007.

    The former Vice President enjoyed tremendous goodwill as the AC presidential candidate. However, after the election, he returned to the PDP. The move, said sources, embarrassed the AC leadership. Other PDP defectors, including Kaita and Ghali Umar Naa’ba, fired salvos at the party, saying that it was not different from the PDP.

    But Atiku also took other steps. He ran to Abeokuta to make peace with his estranged boss, Obasanjo. It was to be a secret fence-mending meeting. But, coming out of the meeting, an embarrassed Atiku was accosted by many reporters. The former President yelled at his visitor. Irked by the turn of events, former Abia State Governor Kalu chided Atiku for the wrong step. The reconciliation was not fruitful. It did not lead to any renewal of contact. When the former Vice President indicated unfolded his plan to contest for the Presidency in 2011, Obasanjo laughed mischievously. “I dey laugh o”, he said. It was loaded with meanings. Indeed, Obasanjo joined forces with President Jonathan to abort Atiku’s dream. When Atiku was tearing the record of the President at the primaries, Obasanjo stood up and whispered some words into the President’s ears. Atiku lost.

    As the polity prepares for the 2015, what is Atiku’s chance, if he joins the presidential race? His associates confide that he has been hosting a lot of brain-storming sessions with many stakeholders, since he walked out of the Abuja convention. He is investing heavily in political research. Since he is not getting younger, he believes that 2015 offers a rare opportunity.

    Since he went back to the PDP, the former Vice President has not been able to wield much influence like before. Recently, he fought to prevent his exclusion from the delegates’ list to the convention. His right as the former PDP Vice President was restored, following the intervention of the PDP national secretariat.

    If he joins the race in the PDP, if the party does not totally disintegrate, the same forces that aborted his ambition in 2011 may do the same again in 2015. At Ibadan, Obasanjo had harsh words for his former deputy. He said it would have been dangerous for the country for him to hand over to him. If there is reconciliation in the divided ruling party and Atiku and his forces return to the fold, there is no assurance that he will beat the incumbent President at the primaries. Party sources even predict a bitter feud between Atiku and Obasanjo’s men-Governors Aliyu Wamakko (Sokoto State), Musa Kwakwanso (Kano), Muazu Aliyu (Niger), Muritala Nyako (Adamawa) and Sule Lamido (Jigawa)- during the presidential primaries. Based on Obasanjo’s influence, the Northern governors may opt for Lamido or another aspirant.

    However, Atiku may emerge as the flag bearer of the PDM, if he defects to the party. Sources said that he may have deliberately supported the balkanisation of the PDP to weaken it, ahead of the next elections. But how far can the PDM go? “This PDM is not the old PDM”, said Anenih, who asked Atiku to retrace his steps. If he goes for the presidential poll as the PDM candidate, his sphere of influence may become narrow across the six geo-political zones.

    If Atiku seeks alliance with the All Progressives Congress (APC), the chieftains of the defunct AC in the fold may be weary. Many of them have described him as an inconsistent politician, who jumped the ship after losing the presidential election. Also, it is not likely that the party will jettison Gen. Muhammadu Buhari (rtd) and other aspirants in favour of the former Vice President.

  • Ex-militants declare Atiku persona-non-grata in Niger Delta

    Ex-militants declare Atiku persona-non-grata in Niger Delta

    FORMER Vice PresidentAtikuAbubakar has been declared a persona-non-grata by leaders of ex-militants in the Niger Delta for threatening to stop the re-election of President Goodluck Jonathan in 2015 and spearheading the break-up of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    The former warlords drawn from all nine states of the Niger Delta made the declaration after a meeting under the aegis of the Leadership, Peace and Cultural Development Initiative (LPCDI) in Yenagoa, the capital of Bayelsa State yesterday.

    They said: “”It is unfortunate that Atiku, who has benefitted so much from the Niger Delta’s crude oil and gas, is leading dissidents in a political coup against the first Southerner to ever ascend the seat of President of Nigeria.

    “We are aware of his vast business interest in the Niger Delta and we are warning him, in his own interest, to stay off the region.

    “He cannot be enjoying our oil money and at the same time use the same money to fight against the owners of the oil.”

    They added: “What we thought we would be hearing from the North was how the Federal Government would implement the spirit and letters of the amnesty programme.

    “Before the former President, UmaruYar’Adua, died, he promised that as soon as we dropped our arms and allowed an unhindered flow of oil from the creeks, we would be given a lifeline.

    “He also promised that we would be empowered, to live a new life from the resources of our oil.

    “We have been waiting patiently for these to happen. Our acceptance of peace benefitted Atiku and his ilk. Why did he not lead a campaign for the Federal Government to provide the empowerment tools?

    “Why has he found it convenient to distract President Jonathan from rendering service to Nigerians?”

    They went on: “It is the same Northerners that vowed that they would make the country ungovernable for Dr. Jonathan. By splitting the PDP and causing further tension in the polity, they are demonstrating the agenda of giving President Jonathan sleepless nights, with the intention of taking over power in 2015.

    The former freedom fighters also urged Jonathan not to be distracted by the antics of persons they alleged were fighting hard to distract him.

    They added they were still waiting patiently for the Federal Government to fully implement the terms of the amnesty programme.

    Atiku’s spokesman, Mallam Garba Shehu, however dismissed the threat.

    He said: “Atiku has devoted his life to defending democracy in Nigeria and will not be prevented or deterred from visiting any part of this great country.

    “Throughout his long career in business, he has maintained strong ties to the Niger Delta and employs thousands in the region. He will continue to passionately defend democratic values and his work to improve the dignity and lives of all Nigerians.”

     

  • Atiku’s pound of flesh after his longest night

    Atiku’s pound of flesh after his longest night

    The implosion in the Peoples Democratic Party, predicted by political analysts, occurred at the special convention of the party in Abuja last Saturday. The prediction had been premised on the analysts’ belief that the party is an amalgamation of strange bed fellows whose guiding principle has no philosophical base other than to hold on to power at all costs and help themselves with the nation’s exchequer even to the detriment of the larger society. New or aspiring members must shelve their thinking, orientation or philosophy and submit themselves to the party’s directive principle: share the money.

    In spite of repeated claims by Chief Vincent Ogbulafor, a former national chairman of PDP, and Governor Godswill Akpabio of Akwa Ibom State that the party, touted as the biggest in Africa, will rule for a minimum of 50 years, not many who had followed the party’s way of life would be shocked at the turn of events. Now the signs are getting clear that some members of the party are getting sick of the unholy wedlock and are now set for divorce.

    The development would constitute a huge relief for millions of well-meaning Nigerians and their foreign sympathisers who are deeply concerned about the nation’s steady descent into anomie. These would include some respondents to a piece in this column sometime last year wherein I suggested that Jonathan should not seek another term in the interest of his party and the nation. They responded to my counsel with indignation, warning me to stop counselling Jonathan against seeking the presidential ticket of the PDP in 2015, as that would be the easiest way to get rid of his docile government and the looting party.

    All the credit for the imminent funeral of the the party must go to former Vice President Atiku Abubakar who led the rebellion at the Eagles Square last Saturday. Given the crises that had engulfed the party, particularly the election that produced two chairmen for the Nigeria Governors’ Forum and the failure of the leaders of the party to resolve the impasse, not many keen watchers of political events expected the convention to end on any other note than rancour. Hence, it was not a shock to many when the news filtered in that Atiku had led seven PDP governors and some other heavyweights in the party to another venue for a parallel convention.

    Seeing the straight face he maintained as he departed the Eagles Square venue of the party’ presidential primaries where Jonathan roundly defeated him with open support from Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo in January 2011, I needed no soothsayer to know that President Jonathan had not heard the last from Atiku. Many people had expected Atiku to give Jonathan a good fight in the primary election with the prospect of a bloc vote from northern delegates to the convention after he was adopted by northern elders and leaders. But the election night turned out the longest for Atiku. The confidence his face radiated at the start of business gave way to anxiety and despair as the counting of votes began.

    The pattern of voting ended up a one-way traffic. Jonathan routed the Turaki of Adamawa even in his (Atiku’s) home state According to Professor Tunde Adeniran, the returning officer, 3542 votes were cast during the primaries, out of which President Jonathan polled 2736. He was trailed by Atiku with 805 votes while Mrs. Sarah Jubril got one vote, apparently the one she cast for herself. If Atiku suspected that he was manipulated into defeat, he had no way of protesting at the election venue. He walked away quietly and bided time to get even.

    If Atiku’s swing from one party to another is a sign of desperation as now perceived by many, the desperation has less to do with his presidential ambition than the chance to take his own pound of flesh after the humiliation he suffered at Eagle Square. Atiku is on a vengeance mission. A vengeance mission devoid of desperation only has a remote chance to succeed, for desperation is the highway that leads to the city called vengeance. Fortunately for him, the President played into his hands with unguarded use of power and the tactless way he and his men handled the crisis that was foisted on the party by its chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur.

    The governors, in sympathy with Governor Murtala Nyako, whose political structures in Adamawa State were demolished by Tukur and replaced with his as soon as he became the party’s chairman, had demanded his immediate removal. But President Jonathan would not have any of that. And rather than pacify the governors or stoop to conquer like Obasanjo did when he had a similar experience with governors at the presidential primaries of the PDP in 2003, he opted for brute force, seeking to weep them into line.

    The result has been continued escalation and diversification of the crisis, which culminated in Governor Rotimi Amaechi’s defeat of Jonathan’s candidate, Governor Jonah Jang, at the recent chairmanship election of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum. Rather than accept defeat, Jonathan and the governors in his camp decided to recognise Jang as a factional chairman of the forum. Lost on Jonathan and his men was the bad precedent that was being set with the recognition of an illegal chairman of the governors’ forum. The precedent produced its first offspring with the emergence of two factions of the PDP last Saturday. Concerned Nigerians can now only pray that the trend does not continue into the 2015 elections.

  • Forum flays Atiku’s PDP faction

    A socio-political youth group, Southern Youths Forum (SYF), has criticised former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, seven governors, three former governors and some federal legislators for walking out on President Goodluck Jonathan at the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) convention held at the Eagles Square in Abuja at the weekend.

    The group is made up of members from the 17 southern states.

    Speaking with reporters yesterday at the Conference Centre of the University of Ibadan (UI), Oyo State, SYF Convener Mr. Odeyemi Oladimeji described the Atiku faction’s attitude as “political rascality”.

    Oladimeji said: “Their action is disrespect of the Office of the President, who happens to be the leader of the party. It is a normal thing to have rancour in a party but the aggrieved members should have handled it maturely.”

    He said the activities of the Atiku faction were aimed at “heating up the polity” and distracting Jonathan.

    Oladimeji restated the group’s commitment to Nigeria’s unity.