Tag: Baba Ijesha

  • Yomi Fabiyi: Why I’m involved with Mohbad, Baba Ijesha

    Yomi Fabiyi: Why I’m involved with Mohbad, Baba Ijesha

    Yomi Fabiyi is an established Nigerian actor, director and producer. He rose to fame after serving under the tutelage of the late comedian cum actor Babatunde Omidina, aka Baba Suwe. He is a filmmaker, and an activist and has been actively involved in distancing his colleague, Baba Ijesha, from a rape allegation. He was also at the forefront of getting to the roots of what caused the death of rising singer, Ilerioluwa Aloba, aka Mohbad. He spoke with The Nation Assistant Entertainment Editor, GBENGA BADA on varied issues in this interview.

    You were among the very few who supported Baba Ijesha during his travails, tell us about it all and the state of the case at the moment.

    He lost in part. He was discharged and acquitted of the molestation charge, as there was no evidence of him having intercourse with a child. It was established that nothing of that sort happened. The only issue remaining is the setup orchestrated by Princess. That refers to the two-count charge against him.

    If that’s the case, why is he still in prison?

    The remaining two-count charges established that they were acting together, but at some point, it was not acting. It was real contact and because the girl was not up to 18. But of course, it’s still subject to appeal at the Supreme Court because the girl was not 14 at that time, and even the Lagos State Government that was filing against Baba Ijesha did not know the age of the girl. There was no documentary evidence to prove the age of the girl. What I was fighting for is not for Baba Ijesha himself, it’s against child abuse. It is unheard of that someone’s daughter was abused or any minor, then the person is asked to submit their body to be sexually abused again. You cannot want your child to go through PTSD because you want to gather evidence. No police officer should do that. No judge will give such an order. And these are the things that I’m fighting for as a society that we must not allow. The gift we owe every child is protection and the truth about the whole case is that it is an organised crime. Princess didn’t have a camera in her house before, she later installed a CCTV camera. She asked the girl to sit down and let him touch her. She coached the girl. Even coaching a minor is punishable by life imprisonment. You can’t coach a child or a minor for sexual abuse. It is child pornography. It’s interesting how far they went, even recording it. All these were the things I was fighting for, not necessarily whether Baba Ijesha was guilty or not. But at the end of the day, when we look at everything, we realise that children are meant to be protected. Unfortunately, everyone was looking in a different direction instead of focusing on the real issue. It’s quite sad.

    Are you still in touch with Baba Ijesha?

    Of course.

    Do you visit him regularly?

    Not regularly. You can’t be going to prison to visit regularly. But we contact each other because we have a friend in the prison. So we talk regularly. And in the past, he has asked me for people’s contacts; to call him, tell this person to call me, tell that person to call me. If I have money, I send it to him as well. It’s always constant communication.

    When was the last time you saw him?

    A few days before my birthday, I went to invite him because I was sending invitations to all my colleagues. I felt like, just because he’s in prison doesn’t mean I shouldn’t share the same invitation with him. And when I took it down there, I was invited to the office of the Controller of Prisons, who asked why I was bringing an invitation to him. I said it was just to help his mental health because, at the end of the day, my conscience was telling me, should I ignore him just because he’s in prison while inviting people I don’t even know? I just wanted to share with him and say, ‘With faith, maybe you’ll be out before then.’ The Controller said they had to look at the logistics, if I was applying for him to be brought to my birthday, what was the advantage? And that they had to honour me. But I said no. So, when they received the invitation, the pack, everything, the sweets, everything I gave to other colleagues, I took it down to him. But after seeing the stress I went through, I told myself, You know what? I will only come here when it is very necessary.

    READ ALSO: FULL LIST: Nigeria, others not indebted to IMF

    What was his reaction when he got the invitation?

    It was natural for him. He felt, ‘If they didn’t set me up for flirting, I should be rejoicing with you that you even remembered me and brought this.’ Though, at some point in the early stage, he didn’t understand. He was like, ‘What are you trying to do?’ Until I explained to him that my conscience is my own policeman. Then he appreciated it. And, you know, he called me to pray for me. I have two people in the industry who reached out to him. A couple of our colleagues, even those who were bold, called me, saying they wanted to check up on him and asking where they could find him. And I led them through how they could reach him. It’s quite funny, but we are human. Setting up grown adults for flirting just because you want to punish someone, or because there’s something attached to that setup, knowing the person will lose his career and everything, that’s exactly what we don’t want in our society. When they arrested Baba Ijesha, a few days later, the police ran a test on the same girl and found sperm on her. That led to the arrest of one Damola Adekola and the security guard of the house, Okele. Those two are at large, and the police refused to go after them. And the sad reality is the girl will look at it that in the same house, these are the people having sex with me. You claim to be my foster mother, yet you didn’t go after these people. It was in this same house that you invited your friend and then accused me of having sex. Meanwhile, the real people having sex with me are still working for you.

    Do you see yourself as being controversial?

    I would say that given how we were brought up, people struggle to understand how an actor can dedicate his time to a humanitarian cause like this. The easiest way for them to interpret my personality is by labelling it as controversial. But I don’t need to beg people or try to convince them that I’m not controversial just because I stand up for certain issues. Let them hold onto that title if they want, until, perhaps, their own children become enlightened and start fighting for the same causes I stand for. When that time comes, will they also call their children controversial for fighting for the rights of others? The truth is most of us were not raised to stand up for the rights of others. And when you do, the oppressor will always try to label you. Some believe that being a celebrity means staying ‘clean’ and avoiding anything that could ‘stain’ your name. But if you fight for justice, there will always be someone on the other side who gives you a label, because most people love to oppress and get away with it. And when you confront them, telling them that their actions are unacceptable and an abuse of human rights, they’ll question what a human right is. The reality is that many people don’t even know their rights. So, those who don’t understand what I stand for may perceive it as controversial.

    You have two children, one in South Africa and one from your wife. Are you officially divorced, or just separated?

    I was never married to her. I have only been married once in my life. I have two baby mamas.

    How do you feel about the situation? Do you feel a certain emptiness? The first woman alleged that you initially rejected the child, and now she has blocked you from seeing them. I notice that when you post about the child’s birthday, you use an old picture. Meanwhile, with your second child, you had a well-publicised naming ceremony.

    I do keep in touch with my child. A lot of things started happening in the media, and honestly, the only thing I would have done differently is to pay closer attention to the personalities of these women. I have a penchant for loyalty, I am a loyal person. The only thing that can truly upset me is disloyalty. But if I see loyalty in someone, I can go to great lengths for them. Nothing can separate us. And that’s the thing, only a few women are truly built with loyalty. Many believe in love but not in loyalty. When people say that behind every successful man, there’s a woman, they often fail to complete the statement. It should be an acutely loyal woman, one who will stand by that man through thick and thin. That’s why only a few marriages last. It’s not just about me; think about it, how many marriages have truly stood the test of time in the last 20 years? Many people make the mistake of prioritising physical attraction. I made that mistake, too, falling for appearances instead of looking deeper into character. But for a marriage to last, what keeps you holding on isn’t just love; it’s the certainty that no matter what happens, the person will stand by you. Unfortunately, that is something I have yet to find in the women I have been with. And that is sad.

    Regarding your children, there have been claims that you rejected one of them at first. What’s your stance on that?

    Let’s be clear, I never denied my child. If I have sex with a woman as an adult and she tells me she’s pregnant, my first instinct is to accept it. I don’t fight over children with women. I have a personal philosophy: a woman owns the child. If a woman wants me in the child’s life, I will be there 100%. But if someone tries to use the child as a tool to punish me, I won’t accept that. I refuse to be manipulated in that way.

    In a recent interview, Wunmi claimed that you hate her. What do you have against her?

    First of all, this isn’t even a conversation I like entertaining because, at the end of the day, the only victim here is Mohbad. Everything else is secondary. Mohbad lived a difficult life, and his death was suspicious. The police themselves confirmed that he was injected by an unqualified person, which led to his death. That alone makes it a homicide case. And yet, despite this, certain key individuals, his wife, his brother, and his uncle, were never treated as suspects, even though they were the last people with him. Now, let’s talk about the three-second video. Mohbad’s younger brother personally told me he had a video of a fight between Wunmi and Mohbad. He described how Wunmi pushed him until he hit his head on the floor. I asked for proof, and he sent me a three-second clip. I took it to the police, but they refused to release the full video. Why? Later, another eyewitness, Zumo, confirmed that there was indeed a fight, but he claimed Wunmi was fighting him instead. That doesn’t add up. Why would a wife be fighting her husband’s friend? And then Zumo later admitted that no, it was actually Wunmi and Mohbad fighting. The problem is people are quick to paint her as a helpless widow, but the truth is she was present when Mohbad died. Until she is properly investigated and cleared, I will keep asking questions.

    What is your ultimate goal in all of this?

    Justice for Mohbad. I want the Lagos State Attorney General to compel the police to release the phone they’ve been hiding. That phone contains evidence that could lead to the truth. And trust me, I would bet my life on it.

    Whose phone is it?

    Adura claimed he owned it, then said he sold it to Damola who just so happened to be present when Mohbad was taken to the hospital and pronounced dead. That phone is key, and I don’t understand why the police are protecting it. At the end of the day, this isn’t about personal grudges. It’s about truth and justice. And I won’t stop pushing until we get it.

  • Sexual Assault: Appeal Court affirms five-year conviction of Baba Ijesha

    Sexual Assault: Appeal Court affirms five-year conviction of Baba Ijesha

    The Court of Appeal, Lagos Division yesterday affirmed the judgment of a Lagos State High Court, which sentenced Nollywood actor, Olanrewaju James, popularly called Baba Ijesha, to five years imprisonment for sexually assaulting a 14-year-old minor.

    The appellate court in its lead judgment delivered by Justice Folashade Ojo, who presided over the case, found the appellant, Baba Ijesha, guilty on counts 4 and 5, where he was accused of indecently touching a minor and sexually assaulting her.

    Other members of the panel, Justice Abdullahi Bayero and Justice Paul Bassi, aligned themselves with the lead judgment.

    The Lagos State Government arraigned Baba Ijesha on a six-count charge bordering on indecent treatment of a child, sexual assault, attempted sexual assault by penetration and sexual assault by penetration.

    In her judgment, the trial judge, Justice Oluwatoyin Taiwo (rtd) of the Ikeja Domestic Violence and Sexual Offences Court, had on July 14, 2022 sentenced Baba Ijesha to five years imprisonment over sexual assault of a minor.

    The court found Baba Ijesha guilty of indecent treatment of a child and sexual assault of a minor between 2013 and 2014, which is contrary to Section 135 of Lagos State Criminal Law 2015.

    Justice Taiwo exonerated him of the offence of sexual assault by penetration which deals with allegedly sexually assaulting the minor by penetration with his car key seven years ago and attempted sexual assault by penetration during another encounter with the minor on April 22, 2021.

    The judge held that the prosecution successfully proved counts two and three that he indecently placed the survivor on his lap and rubbed his penis on her body.

    Dissatisfied, Baba Ijesha, through his counsel Mr. Kayode Olabiran, approached the Appeal Court, praying it to allow the appeal and set aside his conviction and sentence.

    The appellant argued that the prosecution failed to prove that he (Baba Ijesha) sexually assaulted the victim, contending that the appellant  merely acted a script that he was invited to act.

    “The Appellant was set up. The Appellant is an actor. He acted in a script that he was invited to act by his colleague (PW1), Damilola Adekoya,” he argued.

    Delivering judgment on the appeal yesterday, Justice Folashade Ojo set aside the appellant’s conviction on indecent treatment of a child and sexual assault of a minor which allegedly occurred between 2013 and 2014, describing the testimony of PW1 (Damilola Adekoya) as hearsay.

    Justice Ojo, however held that on the event that occurred on April 19, 2021, the evidence of PW1 (Damilola Adekoya) was an eyewitness account, adding that an eyewitness account remains credible and one of the most effective ways to established commission of an offence.

    Besides, the court held that the appellant voluntarily confessed to the crime of the event of April 19, 2021, and did not challenge the statement of (PW1), Damilola Adekoya, throughout the proceedings.

    Justice Ojo noted that the appellant made extra-judicial statement at Sabo Police Station Lagos State on April 19, 2021, and another statement at the State Criminal Investigation Department, Panti on the 28th of April 2021, which were tendered in evidence.

    Read Also: 2,659 jostles for NNPC foundation opportunities

    The court held that in the two statements, the appellant admitted that he indecently touched and indeed molested PW2 while she was alone with him in PW1’s (Damilola Adekoya) apartment.

    Justice Ojo held: “The law is certain that there is no other evidence other than admission in commission of an offence.

    “From the totality of the evidence of PW2, it can be safely inferred that as at the date of the victim’s testimony, she was at best 15 years old and a child by virtue of Section 261 of the Child’s Rights Law of Lagos State, 2015.

    “It is significant to note that the appellant did not challenge PW2 on the evidence she gave. It is in view of all these that I hold that the prosecution established that PW2, the victim of the offence was a child at the time of the alleged offences in 2021.

    “I have carefully looked at the record and unable to agree with the appellant that he was merely acting a script. The interaction between PW2 and the appellant on the 19th April, 2021was not a theatrical performance of make-believe but a personal encounter between the two of them.

    “Moreover, PW2’s (victim) body language supported by her oral testimony and documentary evidence clearly show that she attempted to distance herself from the appellant.

    “The most inference to draw from appellant’s action in searching the entire house immediately after PW1 left with her visitors and sexually assaulting PW2 is that he intended to commit the offence, and did commit the offence.

    “It’s trite that factual findings of the trial court involving the credibility of witnesses are accorded almost respect. Trial courts have the advantage of first-time observation, which allows them to assess witnesses’ demeanour and manner of testifying during the trial.

    “On the event of April 19, 2021, it is my firm belief that the evidence of PW1 does not amount to hearsay; she was an eyewitness.

    “My conclusion is that the evidence presented by the prosecution before the trial court on the offence of indecent treatment of a child, and sexual assault committed by the appellant on the 19th of April 2021 is compelling and sufficient to justify the appellant’s conviction.

    “In conclusion, I have no hesitation in affirming the appellant’s conviction for the indecent treatment of a child and sexual assault.

    “The appellant indecently touched PW2’s body in a sexual manner, in violation of Section 135 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State 2015. His actions constitute sexual assault against PW2.

    “I am of the view that the respondent discharged the burden proving its case beyond reasonable doubt against the appellant on the allegations of April 19, 2021, and I so hold.

    “I have no reason to interfere with the findings of the trial court on the event of April 19, 2021.

    “In all, I hold that this appeal succeeds in part and it is accordingly allowed in part.”

    The court ordered as follows: “The appellant’s conviction and sentence to five years imprisonment for the offence of indecently touching a child contrary to Section 135 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State 2011 (count 2 of the charge) is set aside.

    “The Appellant’s conviction of 3 years imprisonment for the offence of sexual assault of a child contrary to section 261 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State 2011 (count 3 of the charge) is set aside.

    “I affirm the conviction and sentence of the appellant to 5 years imprisonment for the offence of indecent treatment of a child contrary to section 135 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State 2015 (count 4 of the charge)

    “The appellant’s conviction and sentence to 3 years imprisonment for sexual assault contrary to section 263 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State 2011 (count 5 of the information) is also affirmed.

    “The sentences for counts 4 and 5 are to run concurrently.”

  • Sexual assault: Appeal Court affirms 5-year conviction of Baba Ijesha

    Sexual assault: Appeal Court affirms 5-year conviction of Baba Ijesha

    The Court of Appeal, Lagos Division on Friday, June 28, affirmed the judgement of a Lagos State High Court, which sentenced Nollywood actor, Olanrewaju James, popularly called Baba Ijesha to five years imprisonment for sexually assaulting a 14-year-old minor.

    The appellate court in its lead judgement delivered by Justice Folashade Ojo who presided over the case found the Appellant, Baba Ijesha guilty on counts 4 and 5, where he was accused of indecently touching a minor and sexually assaulted her.

    Other members of the panel, Justice Abdullahi Bayero and Justice Paul Bassi aligned themselves with the lead judgement.

    The Lagos state government arraigned Baba Ijesha on a six-count charge bordering on the indecent treatment of a child, sexual assault, attempted sexual assault by penetration and sexual assault by penetration.

    In her judgement, the trial judge, Justice Oluwatoyin Taiwo (rtd) of the Ikeja Domestic Violence and Sexual Offences Court, on July 14, 2022, sentenced Baba Ijesha to five years imprisonment over the sexual assault of a minor.

    The court found Baba Ijesha guilty of indecent treatment of a child and sexual assault, of a minor between 2013 and 2014, which is contrary to Section 135 of Lagos State Criminal Law 2015.

    Justice Taiwo exonerated him of the offence of sexual assault by penetration which deals with allegedly sexually assaulting the minor by penetration with his car key seven years ago and attempted sexual assault by penetration during another encounter with the minor on April 22, 2021.

    The judge held that the prosecution successfully proved counts two and three that he indecently placed the survivor on his lap and rubbed his penis on her body.

    Dissatisfied, Baba Ijesha through his counsel Mr. Kayode Olabiran, approached the appeal court praying it to allow the appeal and set aside his conviction and sentence.

    The Appellant argued that the prosecution failed to prove that he (Baba Ijesha) sexually assaulted the victim, contending that the appellant  merely acted a script that he was invited to act.

    Read Also: There’s no evidence Baba Ijesha slept with victim- Yomi Fabiyi

    He argued “The Appellant was set up. The Appellant is an actor. He acted in a script that he was invited to act by his colleague (PW1), Damilola Adekoya.

    Delivering judgment on the appeal yesterday, Justice Folashade Ojo set aside appellant’s conviction on indecent treatment of a child and sexual assault of a minor which allegedly occurred between 2013 and 2014 describing the testimony of PW1 (Damilola Adekoya) as hearsay.

    Justice Ojo, however held that on the event that occurred on April 19, 2021, the evidence of PW1 (Damilola Adekoya) was an eye witness account adding that an eye witness account remains credible and one of the most effective ways to established commission of an offence.

    Besides, the court held that the Appellant’s voluntarily confessed to the crime of the event of April 19, 2021, and did not challenge the statement of  (PW1), Damilola Adekoya throughout the proceedings.

    Justice Ojo noted that the appellant made extra judicial statement at Sabo Police station Lagos State on 19th of April 2021, and another statement at the State Criminal Investigation Department, Panti on the 28th of April 2021, which were tendered in evidence.

    The court held that in the two statements, the appellant admitted that he indecently touched and indeed molested PW2 while she was alone with him in PW1’s (Damilola Adekoya) apartment.

    Justice Ojo held “The law is certain that there is no other evidence other than admission in commission of an offence. 

    “From the totality of the evidence of PW2 it can be safely inferred that  as at the date of the victim’s testimony she was at best 15 years old and a child by virtue of Section 261 of the Child’s Rights Law of Lagos State, 2015. 

    “It is significant to note that the appellant did not challenge PW2’s on the evidence she gave. It is in view of all these that I hold that the prosecution established that PW2, the victim of the offence was a child at the time of the alleged offences in 2021. 

    “I have carefully looked at the record and unable to agree with the appellant, that he was merely acting a script.The interaction between PW2 and the appellant on the 19th April, 2021was not a theatrical performance of make-believe but a personal encounter between the two of them. 

    “Moreover, PW2’s (victim) body language supported by her oral testimony and documentary evidence clearly show that she attempted to distance herself from the appellant. The most inference to draw from from appellant’s action in searching the entire house immediately after PW1 left with her visitors and sexually assaulting PW2 is that he intended to commit the offence, and did committed the offence.

    “It’s  trite that factual findings of the trial court involving the credibility of witnesses are accorded almost respect. Trial courts have the advantage of first-time observation, which allows them to assess witnesses’ demeanour and manner of testifying during the trial. 

    “On the event of April 19, 2021, it is my firm belief that the evidence of PW1 does not amount to hearsay, she was an eye witness. My conclusion is that the evidence presented by the prosecution before the trial court on the offence of indecent treatment of a child, and sexually assault committed by the appellant on the 19th of April 2021 is compelling and sufficient to justify the appellant’s conviction.

    “In conclusion, I have no hesitation in affirming the appellant’s conviction for the indecent treatment of a child , and sexual assault. The appellant indecently touched PW2’s body in a sexual manner, in violation of Section 135 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State 2015. His actions constitute sexual assault against PW2.

    “I am of the view that the respondent discharge the burden proving it’s case beyond reasonable doubt against the appellant on the allegations of April 19, 2021, and I so hold. I have no reason to interfere with the findings of the trial court on the event of April 19, 2021. 

    In all, I hold that this appeal succeed in part and it accordingly allowed in part. 

    The court ordered as follows “The appellant’s conviction, and sentence to 5 years imprisonment for the offence of indecently touching of a child contrary to Section 135 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State 2011 (count 2 of the charge) is set aside.

    “The Appellant conviction of 3 years imprisonment for the offence of sexual assault of a child contrary to section 261 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State 2011 (count 3 of the charge) is set aside.

    “I affirm the conviction and sentence of the appellant to 5 years imprisonment for the offence of indecent treatment of a child contrary to section 135 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State 2015 (count 4 of the charge)

    “The appellant’s conviction and sentence to 3 years imprisonment for sexual assault contrary to section 263 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State 2011 (count 5 of the information) is also affirmed.

    “The sentences for counts 4 and 5 are to run concurrently”.

  • There’s no evidence Baba Ijesha slept with victim- Yomi Fabiyi

    There’s no evidence Baba Ijesha slept with victim- Yomi Fabiyi

    Actor Yomi Fabiyi has continued to defend his embattled colleague Baba Ijesha on his alleged rape case.

    The Nation reported Baba Ijesha was arrested and sentenced to five-year imprisonment for raping a minor, who is the adopted daughter of popular comedian Princess.

    Giving an update on the case, Fabiyi claimed that there is no evidence that Baba Ijesha slept with the girl; which was why the judge didn’t sentence him to life imprisonment.  

    Fabiyi stated in a recent interview that Baba Ijesha’s appeal process is still ongoing in court.

    He further stated that Princess called Baba Ijesha to shoot a skit, and the girl also made a similar statement in court, adding that the man who slept with the girl was walking freely, and her age wasn’t 14, as many claimed.

    “Baba Ijesha’s appeal process is still ongoing in court. There was no evidence that he slept with the girl; that was why the judge didn’t sentence him to life imprisonment. 

    “He was called by Princess to shoot a skit, and the girl also said in court that she was called to shoot a skit. 

    “The person who actually slept with the girl is walking freely. The girl’s age is not 14. They never gave the court her birth certificate. We are waiting for the appeal court judgement,” he said. 

  • Appeal court reserves judgment in Baba Ijesha’s conviction

    Appeal court reserves judgment in Baba Ijesha’s conviction

    The Court of Appeal in Lagos State has reserved judgment in the appeal filed by Nollywood actor, Olanrewaju James, alias Baba Ijesha, challenging his conviction by an Ikeja High Court over the sexual assault of a minor.

    The three-man panel of the appellate court, led by Justice Folasade Ojo, reserved the appeal for judgment yesterday after listening to arguments of the appellant and the respondent.

    Other members of the panel are Justice Abdullahi Bayero and Justice Paul Bassi.

    In his notice of appeal, Nollywood actor prayed the appellate court to set aside the judgment of the lower court.

    During the hearing of the appeal yesterday Olanrewaju’s counsel, Kayode Olabiran, told the court that the appeal was filed on June 1, 2023.

    Read Also: Tinubu approves routing of 20% palliatives through religious, traditional leaders

    He argued that the prosecution could not prove that he sexually assaulted the victim.

    Olabiran said: “The charge itself is centered on defilement of a minor but the prosecution couldn’t prove the victim’s age. The appellant was set up. The appellant is an actor. He acted in a script that he was invited to act by his colleague (PW1), Damilola Adekoya a.k.a Princess.

    “Damilola Adekoya asked the appellant to come and act a script. It is in the statement of PW1, at Panti Police Station, unknowingly to the appellant there was a CCTV in the sitting room.

    Whatever we watched in that movie was a script by the producer and the video of the scene of the acting was tendered by the prosecution.

    “Based on his confessional statement as at the day of the arrest, he was under duress and there were so many people beating him, and so he confessed to the offence.”

    Olabiran, however, urged the court to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the lower court.

    The Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), Babajide Martins, urged the court to dismiss the appeal for lacking in merit. He argued that the appeal by the appellant was a misconception.

    Martins also urged the court to affirm the judgment of the lower court delivered on July 14, 2022, which convicted Baba Ijesha of indecent treatment of a child and sexual assault.

    On the victim’s age, Martin submitted that the victim said she was born on October 6, 2006, which puts her age at 14, in 2013, when the offence was committed.

    “At the time she gave evidence in 2021, she was 17 years old, which still makes her a child,” he argued.

    Justice Oluwatoyin Taiwo (rtd) of an Ikeja Domestic Violence and Sexual Offences Court, on July 14, 2022, sentenced Baba Ijesha to five years imprisonment over the sexual assault of a minor.

    Justice Toyin convicted and sentenced the actor after he was found guilty of four out of six counts, preferred against him by the Lagos State government.

  • JUST IN: Yoruba actor Baba Ijesha appeals conviction

    JUST IN: Yoruba actor Baba Ijesha appeals conviction

    Nollywood actor, Olanrewaju James, popularly known as Baba Ijesha, has asked the Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, to set aside his conviction by a Lagos State High Court over the sexual assault of a minor.

    Justice Oluwatoyin Taiwo (retd.) of the Ikeja Domestic Violence and Sexual Offences Court, on Thursday, July 14, 2022, sentenced Baba Ijesha to five years imprisonment over the sexual assault of a minor.

    But dissatisfied with the judgment, Baba Ijesha approached the appeal court to challenge his five-year jail term.

    Read Also: Embattled actor Baba Ijesha loses father

    Baba Ijesha through his counsel, Kayode Olabiran on Tuesday, April 23, told the appeal court that his client was set up and that he acted according to a script that he was invited to act on by his colleague.

    “The Appellant was set up. The Appellant is an actor. He acted in a script that he was invited to act by his colleague (PW1), Damilola Adekoya,” he said.

    But the Director of Public Prosecution, Dr Babajide Martins, urged the court to dismiss the appeal for lacking in merit and also a misconception.

    He urged the court to affirm the judgment of the lower court.