Tag: Babangida

  • Babangida and his autobiography

    Babangida and his autobiography

    By Mike Kebonkwu

     A fortnight ago, the deity and oracle of Minna, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida came down from his sanctum on the Hill Top Mansion and sauntered into Abuja, the federal capital territory.  Although infirm with age, life has been kind to him even at the winter of life.  His presence still elicits tremor in the political firmament in Nigeria.  The presentation of his autobiography was a roll call of who’s who in the ruling elites, with captains of industries, clergies, traditional rulers and politicians.  It was encomium all the way on the wheelchair bound general and ex-military leader and self-styled president.  Life has cast a shadow on the one time sabre rattling general who once possessed the power of life and death.   

    It was an occasion for the launch of his autobiography, “A Journey in Service”.  There was great expectation that the autobiography was going to fill the yawning gap in all the speculations about his life and career as military president and especially, the event of the annulment of June 12 presidential election which was adjudged as the freest and fairest in our political history.  Lo and behold, it was not to be as many people went away disappointed that the former military head of state still chose to hide behind one finger.  It is a story of heroic exploit in self-glorification.  

    For the record, I have not read the autobiography but hopefully, will do.

    One thing I am persuaded about is that there are no epidemics of amnesia or dementia in Nigeria; but there might well be selective memory lost. Babangida lived a lie in both his military and political lives which veiled his persona.  On his autobiography, “A Journey in Service”, one is wont to ask, service to, or for whom? 

    For those who came to eulogize him, understandably, it was a payback time to a political godfather that made them in politics and business.  My first insight to the man Babangida was in his biography by the ace journalist, Dan Agbese titled, “Ibrahim Babangida – the Military, Politics and Power in Nigeria”.  In the book, I saw a brilliant and ambitious young man on a personal odyssey manipulating people and religion as cat paw to pull chestnut from the fire.   Babangida is a northerner but not of the Hausa-Fulani stock.  His acceptance into the northern oligarchy was achieved through solid personal achievement in his meteoric rise in the military hierarchy to the top brass and head of a military government after a successful coup d’état.

    Babangida was a great military leader, manipulative and full of guile. He understands power and the Nigerian psyche.  He did not miss the opportunity to play one group against the other, using people and dumping them.  He recognized the polarizing role of religion and took Nigeria into the Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC) in utter disregard to our secularity and diversity just to win the heart of northern establishment.  He called himself the Evil Genius but he was the ultimate evil; like the ‘Devil on the Cross’, in the world of Ngugi Wa Thiongo by that title. 

    During the book launch, he raked in over N16 billion and pledge for a Presidential Library in his honour which has become the fad.  Babangida does not need the money.  He is so rich that even Forbes cannot locate and estimate his net worth.   Babangida was generous with our commonwealth spirited from our treasury and made a clique in the elite rich and the nation broke.  For eight solid years, Babangida manipulated everybody; taking Nigeria through rigmarole and an endless political transition that was designed to fail at a huge cost.    

    Read Also: Nigerian Consumers Embrace Inverter Technology Amid Power Challenges

    All the guests at the book launch were VIPs that came to honour him; they had no bad words for him; he was a great leader!  That is understandable because he was a benevolent benefactor to them during his years of locusts as military leaders.  In and out of government, his Hill Top Mansion in Minna became a shrine for politicians for endorsement and hefty handouts to support their political ambitions without discrimination; demonstrating the unity of the ruling elite.  That was what you saw during the book launch. 

    Was Babangida’s service in his ‘Journey in Service’ to Nigeria?  Roads, streets and institutions are named after him.  I am yet to see any national institution or road named after Chief Gani Fawehinmi for his entire struggle for the masses of this country, and his footprint in the judiciary, fighting for justice.  It is not too much to name the Supreme Court Complex after Fawehinmi but we will prefer to dismiss him as an agitator and an angry activist with other tribal arguments.  Nigeria is yet to identify her heroes but prefers to celebrate career criminals with official imprimatur.

    It is customary with my people in Agbor in Delta State that when people are old, they are expected to speak the truth and make peace with God and man and atone or expiate for every wrong as a rite of passage. That is not in Babangida.  

    What are the legacies of Babangida?  It is to his eternal credit that that he brought about the erosion of discipline as defining feature in the military;  giving unmerited and unqualified privileges to some junior and middle level officers against their superiors. He institutionalized corruption in Nigeria and everybody has a price.  To those opposed to him, he wooed them, befriended and destroyed them.  When he wanted to use the ace educationist with Spartan discipline, Tai Solarin, he first dressed him in a fine apparel of white ‘babariga’ and cap to match and poured palm oil on him in front of the purpose-designed Peoples’ Bank of Nigeria.  He sold Nigeria to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank and introduced the suffocating ‘Structural Adjustment Programme’ (SAP).  Many Nigerian students were shot and killed during the Anti-SAP protest.  Nobody called on him during the book launch to account for the blood of those Nigerian youths. 

    What about Nigerians killed during June 12 protests across the country and numerous bomb explosions?  What about the parcel bomb that killed Dele Giwa; did his autobiography expose those behind it?  He wasted huge resources to conduct an election which he annulled.  If that crowd at his behest were not suffering from memory loss, why did they not interrogate the inner recesses of his conscience and use the opportunity to demand for unreserved apologies to Nigeria and Nigerians?

    And the man Babangida looked Nigerians in the face and wrote in his ‘A Journey in Service’ that it was Abacha and his clique that influenced the abortion or annulment of June 12 election; his subordinates and juniors as a military head of state with everything at his behest and beck and call. That is a lie from the pit of hell!  Babangida understands the dynamics of power game and was ultimate Machiavelli personified.  In the military at his time and era, nobody could have stood on his path and lived to tell the story.  He killed his childhood friend Mamman Vatsa after the 1986 Coup d’état.  If Abacha was a stumbling block, he could have done away with him one way or the other.  It is cowardly and immoral to lie against a dead man.  Babangida could have retired Abacha and his clique if they existed and heavens would not have fallen.  What about the over $6 billion oil windfall that disappeared without trace during his regime for which the maverick musical maestro, Fela Anikulapo Kuti waxed an album?   Today, our leaders gathered to honour him with cymbals and minstrel! 

    Babangida is an unrepentant master of circumlocution and a vile schemer and super dribbler that was nicknamed Maradona.  As the saying goes, the leopard does not change its skin.  Babangida is as charming as he is deceitful; with half-truths and outright prevarications.  This was the reason why he could not take responsibility and blamed the dead for his perfidious and treacherous act of annulment of June 12 which remains a stain and the darkest moment in our political history.  What he needed was a fine detergent and laundry of his image and reputation which was sullied like crimson but failed to take the occasion to do. By now, Nigerians should know their hero, statesmen and patriots.  We may attempt to rewrite history but at the twilight and winter of life, we should reconcile with humanity and God and speak the truth which is the only rite of passage.

    •Kebonkwu Esq, an Abuja-based attorney, writes via mikekebonkwu@yahoo.com

  • June 12 Annulment: Post confession, but without anapology from him, how should Nigerians see Babangida?

    June 12 Annulment: Post confession, but without anapology from him, how should Nigerians see Babangida?

    Abiola, his wife, Kudirat, alongside his many businesses; a NADECO chieftain, Alfred Rewane; business woman Suliat Adedeji and several others were consumed in the political convolution that Babangida’s perfidy set off, which completely engulfed Nigeria.

    He ought to be aware that these  tragic events can never be wished away merely through a trifle acknowledgement of wrong-doing, but by a major act of seeking  national forgiveness, coupled with corresponding acts of reparation; whether financial or otherwise. Nothing less would do”.

    A Premium Times Editorial.

    My first, and only, meeting with General Ibrahim Babangida  was at his opulent hilltop castle in Minna, Niger state, a few years ago in the company of  members of the Board of a Federal institution in the state, when we paid him a courtesy call.

    Although already hobbled by radiculopathy – a condition he allegedly

    got serving Nigeria on the war front – he actually once told a CNN reporter that he still has a bullet lodged in his body. I could not miss his gaiety, affability and charm; all of which were copiously on display. He was winsome and, when the Chairman introduced me as a columnist with The Nation on Sunday, he literally grabbed me, pulling me towards himself for some small talk.

    The ever irrepressible charmer!

    To know General Babangida, no matter how fleetingly, is to be  unwilling to roast him the way many have done since his book launch this  past week.

    Unfortunately, his gargantuan sins against God and humanity make it absolutely impossible for one to stay on that narrow and straight road. General Babangida offended, not only man, but God.

    His story is, therefore, a  tragi – comedy – a man so gifted, yet so unremittingly conflicted; that only God in His infinite mercy, not man, can forgive him his many sins against Nigeria and humanity.

    Babangida evokes strong emotions. For most, he is the symbol of the country’s tumultuous past, a past marked by nasty militarism, political upheaval, systemic corruption and economic stagnation.

    In recent years, however, he has attempted to rebrand himself, coyly seeking redemption, and forgiveness, even if the words “I regret” are too heavy for him; the more reason his efforts are like pouring water on a duck – fruitless.

    The catalyst for his latest attempt at transformation was his recent  confession, during his book launch, regarding the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election.

    For years, he has denied any involvement in the annulment, but in a surprising turn of events, he publicly acknowledged his role in the gross act.

    The admission has sparked a huge national conversation, with many Nigerians grappling with how to process it, especially as he seems too  conceited to really, meaningfully, apologise to a nation he has severally trampled upon.

    Most commentators have, understandably, taken the retired general to the cleaners while on the other hand, some are willing to see his  confession as an act of courage and a  willingness to confront the demons of his past as well as take responsibility for his actions though  his failure to apologise directly, and fully, rather than take cover under some linguistic razmataz, robbed him of the sympathy of most Nigerians.

    In a country where public officials rarely admit to any wrongdoing, Babangida’s acknowledgment of his role in the annulment would have been a refreshing change, were he not unnecessarily too important in his own eyes.

    His traducers are, of course, far more skeptical, viewing his confession as a calculated move designed to rehabilitate his image and secure his legacy. They argue that his admission of guilt is too little, too late, and that it does not erase the harm caused by his malevolent actions.

    Read Also: June 12: Olanipekun berates Babangida for not apologising to Abiola, family

    Also, they argue, Babangida’s role in the annulment of the June 12 election was not an isolated incident. His military regime was marked by widespread human rights abuses, including the suppression of free speech and the detention of political opponents.

    In this context, his confession can be seen as an attempt to deflect attention from his broader record, to focus on a single issue, rather than confront the full scope of his torrid actions.

    So, how should Nigerians see Babangida post his confession?

    The answer is complex.

    While his admission of guilt is a step in the right direction, it is only the beginning of a long process of reckoning and accountability.

    Ultimately, Nigerians must approach Babangida’s confession with a critical eye, recognizing the extent of his thoroughly inhuman misdeeds, as well as, both the significance of his admission and the limitations of his apology.

    By doing so, we can begin to build a more nuanced understanding of our country’s past; one that acknowledges the complexities and contradictions of figures like Babangida. That would, without a doubt, lead us to a fair and just conclusion as to how we believe history will, inevitably, judge him.

    One Nigerian who has begun that process, even before the billions – Naira deluge of a book launch and his confession and efette apologies, is Professor Steve Egbo who, a whole 24(2001) years earlier, has written a tome on the  general with conclusions that have more than a fair chance of representing the retired general’s epitaph.

    With an eye on space constraint then , let us quote Professor Egbo at some length in his book:’Political Soldiering : Africa’s Men on Horseback”,  especially pages 84 – 94.

    Wrote Egbo: “Many have reacted to Babangida’s so called autobiography. Many more will still react. As a response to his obstinacy and lies, I have decided to produce a brief excerpt from my book, “Political Soldiering : Africa’s Men on Horseback”, published 24 years ago. This will serve as my personal response to Babangida’s false narratives. His attempt to rewrite history in his own image is just a proof of who he is.

    How Babangida’s private emotions, ideas and plans were foisted on the nation, how the nation’s resources were subjected to a plethora of abuse and misuse, and how the nation remained exceptionally receptive to para-psychological manipulations for a period of eight years vastly go beyond conventions and traditional wisdom.

    For Babangida, politics is not just “the art of the possible”, it is the art of ruling a people through deception, empty promises, lies and intimidation. For him, while politics remain the process by which people compete for the control of the instruments of favor, it must involve “the use of fraud”.

    For the smiling General and the perfidious faithlessness he represents, the best politician is a juggler, or better still a sorcerer, full of tricks, inconsistencies, nihilism and misathropy. Babangida saw himself as the Charles De Gaulle of our time.

    He believes himself to be a strong man, a man of action with a strong dose of egoism, pride, toughness, and cunning.

    This belief best explains the reason why he took Nigeria on a jolly ride for so many years. He told Nigerians that as political nonentities, they must learn the rudiments of democracy at his feet.

    It was a long lecture, scheduled to last eight years or  till eternity.  However, it was a very sad lecture because at the end of it all, Nigeria learnt nothing but lost everything. The energies, the resources and the time channeled therein went down the drain”.

    That I believe is how Nigerians should see, and remember, General Ibrahim Babangida, the self – proclaimed “evil genius”, alias Maradona.

  • June 12: Olanipekun berates Babangida for not apologising to Abiola, family

    June 12: Olanipekun berates Babangida for not apologising to Abiola, family

    Former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and Life Bencher, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) has chastised former Military Head of State General Ibrahim Babangida over the recent launch of his autobiography in which he expressed regret on the annulment of June 12, 1999 Presidential election.

    The Presidential election was believed to have been won by Bashorun M.K.O. Abiola.

    Olanipekun said Babangida’s autobiography as it relates to the June 12, 1999 election was full of contradictions.

    Olanipekun stated this in a lecture he delivered yesterday in honour of Pastor E. A. Adeboye to mark his 83rd birthday at the headquarters of the  Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) Mowe, Ogun State.

    Olanipekun noted that despite all the regrets expressed by Babangida over the annulment of the election, there was neither remorse nor apology to the family of Abiola.

    “Conspicuously, throughout the unveiling of the former military president’s autobiography and the ‘pomp and pageantry ‘ that appeared to engulf the occasion, there was no word of ‘apology’ either to the late M.K.O. Abiola or his family or Nigerians who the former military president admitted that their will was subverted.”

    Olanipekun contended that what Babangida did was treasonable “and it is still treasonable.

    “There has been no remorse, no apology, no contrition, no reparation and no entreaty to Nigerians for forgiveness or pardon.

    “Abiola himself died while in detention, his wife Kudirat was killed, his business was ruined, his family was plunged into disarray, several Nigerians lost their lives while some were killed by the agents of the state, including Pa Alfred Rewane”, he lamented.

    Olanipekun said that for Nigeria to attain her full potential in terms of stability and prosperity, the present structure of the country must be restructured.

    Read Also: Still on Babangida’s June 12, 1993 ‘truth’

    “I am of the view that this amoebic configuration or contraption would not lead us far,” he said.

     During panel discussions, the Chairperson of Oyo State Anti-Corruption Agency,  Justice Eni Esan (rtd), said, “I want to commend Chief Wole Olanipekun for his incisive, lucid and very wonderful lecture. He has talked comprehensively about Justice and equity”

    She identified the multifaceted problems plaguing the country and noted the problems had been there for several years and what Chief Olanipekun did with his treatise was to proffer solutions to these problems, adding that if the country must rise above its present challenges, practical steps must be taken to toe the solution enumerated by Olanipekun.

    ” I agree with Chief Olanipekun on the need for a new constitution. If the foundation is destroyed,  what would the righteous do? We are merely treating the symptoms and neglecting the root causes of our problems.

    “The country must be decentralized so that the grassroots can be developed.

    She blamed the political class for the rot in the system, noting that the reforms must start with the cleansing of the system that encourages corruption

    “There are challenges to the implementation of these solutions. The political elites will resist reforms. It may imperil their interest and they may want to resist the change”

    She described other factors mitigating the growth of the nation as religious and cultural beliefs,  adding that these “antithetical beliefs fuel biases in different areas in the society”

    “Some parts of the country do not believe in education. We need re-orientation in the country.”

    Another discussant, a retired Deputy Inspector General of Police, Pastor Leye Oyebade also applauded the guest speaker for bringing to the fore the hydra-headed problems the country is facing at this crucial time.

    He noted that there was an urgent need to build institutions that would promote law and order.

    “There is a need to build institutions and make them function and judiciary is very key in this regard. We need to gather the stakeholders in the Justice administration sector investigation, prosecution and the correctional sector. A more reformation approach in the Justice Administration sector is desirable now”

    He noted that the lack of political will has impeded the overhauling of the constitution adding that political will would change the narrative and it was urgently required of our political leaders.

  • Still on Babangida’s June 12, 1993 ‘truth’

    Still on Babangida’s June 12, 1993 ‘truth’

    Actions, inactions and misdeeds surrounding the elections of June 12, 1993 will remain deeply etched in Nigeria’s history. It was a watershed moment in the country’s political journey. It wasn’t a make-believe event conjured up by a genius filmmaker. This date marked a turning point where lives were snuffed out, dreams were shattered, and peace was obliterated. Even after more than three decades, the events surrounding that day continue to evoke intense passions. It was a story of betrayal and outright theft of Chief Moshood Kasimawo Olawale Abiola’s presidential mandate by military runners..

    Nigerian citizens who lived through that dark chapter do not treat the events lightly. They don’t laugh off the nightmare of that period as the attendees in Abuja did last week when General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida (rtd.) tried to tell his own version of the truth regarding Nigeria’s political collapse under his reign as military President. For years, many Nigerians had hoped Babangida would finally come clean about his actions before his time runs out. But did that happen? It was too unlikely! The event, with its lively atmosphere, had the feel of a gathering where a group of perpetrators celebrate their bloody deeds at the graves of their victims—32 years after the fact. The occasion wasn’t only about flowery praise for Babangida; it also involved raising an astronomical sum of N17 billion during the launch of his autobiography, A Journey in Service. Whether this stands as the world or Africa’s record for the highest-grossing book launch is still up for debate, but one thing is clear: it certainly takes the crown in Nigeria’s book-launching history. As his supporters said, Babangida’s friends gathered to mark his 83rd birthday. And also spit deliriously on the shallow graves of the victims of that tragic moment in Nigeria’s political trajectories!

    But beyond the lavish fanfare, the book failed to meet expectations. Many had hoped it would provide answers, bringing clarity to the unanswered questions surrounding his eight years of military dictatorship. Instead, the book fell disappointingly short. Those who read it found it to be pure Babangida—shifty and evasive—skirting around key issues. For those who sought closure, the book proved even more frustrating. It presented a man who seemed to live in total denial, refusing to show any remorse or offer an apology, especially in relation to the June 12 annulment and the tragic events that followed. Babangida’s actions led to the death of Abiola, with his family, civil society activists, critics, and countless innocent Nigerians caught in the crossfire. His refusal to express any regret left many wondering if there would ever be accountability for the horrors of that era.

    Babangida’s so-called ‘acceptance of responsibility’ for what happened after his departure—particularly for the atrocities committed under General Sani Abacha—felt hollow. Expressing remorse or apologising, however, was too difficult for him. His cold response to the murder of journalist Dele Giwa, who was killed in 1986, only confirmed his detachment from the truth. Babangida’s dismissal of the question, “Who killed Dele Giwa?” with arrogance, instead of addressing it directly, was a display of sheer defiance. Despite numerous accounts implicating his aides in the murder, he feigned ignorance. That was his ‘truth’, and he seemed determined to stick to it.

    Babangida’s manner of speaking about his actions has long been characterised by this same evasive approach. A particularly revealing instance occurred during an interview with CNN’s Christian Purefoy. Babangida’s handling of Purefoy’s attempts to get him to apologise for annulling the 1993 elections showcased his well-rehearsed evasions. It is important to note that the interview was conducted 17 years after that unfortunate annulment of the election. Here’s an excerpt from that exchange:

    CNN:: You annulled what has seemed to be the freest and fairest election in Nigeria in 1993. Do you regret annulling the elections?

    IBB: You must admit, this man ran the freest, the best election in the history of this country.

    CNN: But then you annulled it.

    IBB: We had to do what would be in the best interest of the country at that time and I accepted full responsibility.

    CNN: How could annulling elections be in the best interest of the country?

    IBB: Don’t forget, as a government, I have more in terms of information about what is likely going to happen. Stability of the country is first and foremost. I knew what I was going to leave behind.

    CNN: But you left behind Abacha; after you annulled the elections, one of Nigeria’s worst dictators came to power.

    IBB: No, he stabilised this country. It didn’t break up. That is credit to him.

    CNN: So, do you feel – looking back – that you regret annulling the elections?

    IBB: Did I? I said it was wrong.

    CNN: So, do you regret annulling the elections?

    IBB; I thought people should understand when you accept responsibility, he is saying blame it on me, and not on any other person.

    CNN: What do you feel is the responsibility of that blame on you?

    Read Also: Beyond Babangida’s Abuja crowd

    IBB: Nigerians are sensible. Nigerians do understand. After taking a long time, they read back and in retrospect, they say “Wait a minute. I think we judged him unfairly. We judged him harshly.”

    CNN: Have you ever apologised to Nigerians for annulling those elections?

    IBB: I told the Nigerians it was wrong. I told the Nigerians “Please, don’t kill anybody, kill me.”

    CNN: Do you feel you should apologise to Nigerians for those annulled elections?

    Read Also: Babangida and his 1966 non-Igbo coup epiphany

    IBB: Those elections were annulled seventeen years ago. What I keep telling Nigerians is for Christ’s sake, let us move forward.

    CNN: Why are you running again? Why do you want to become the President of Nigeria again?

    IBB: We all, every Nigerian should aspire to be the president of this country. That is the first thing and anybody who thinks he has something to offer this country… don’t forget I gave my life; I carried a bullet in me just for the sake of this country.

    CNN: In the past elections, politicians have been involved in paying off young men, stuff ballot boxes in the Delta, arm young boys to put in their politicians in to power. Are you ready to do that to win the election?

    IBB: No, I’m just a candidate. I’m not in the position to ask young men to fill up the boxes, because that will be illegal. The government, however, promised, assured us that it will conduct a free, transparent, each vote will count, and there will be no forgery.

    CNN: Do you think that is the case? Do you think that’s what’s going on right now?

    IBB: I think I have no option but to accept that the government is going to do it. I said I was going to conduct a free and fair election, and I did.

    This response, which praises Abacha for “stabilising” Nigeria, glosses over the devastating consequences of Babangida’s actions. He conveniently forgets that it was his annulment of the election that paved the way for Abacha’s bloody reign. Still, Babangida continues to praise himself as someone who “sacrificed” everything for the country. This idea of sainthood has been perpetuated by Babangida over the years, despite the evidence that suggests otherwise.

    Looking back on that interview and Babangida’s long history of dodging accountability, it’s clear that his “truth” has been carefully constructed. Thirty-two years after June 12, 1993, his version of events is now laden with an increasingly diluted narrative, tailored to suit those he deems “sensible” Nigerians. However, critics remain unconvinced, especially since Babangida has now publicly admitted that Abiola won the election by meeting all the requirements: majority votes and the necessary geographic spread. Still, many question Babangida’s unwillingness to take responsibility for the crisis he triggered. He had the power as Commander-in-Chief to reverse the annulment but chose not to. Critics point out that his so-called regret rings hollow when he had the chance to right the wrongs.

    Many see Babangida’s ‘truth’ as a mere collection of half-truths and lies. While it’s understandable that he may want to sanitise his image in his autobiography, genuine remorse can only come with full accountability. Those who were part of his regime and are now telling their own stories continue to challenge the narrative Babangida has crafted. His autobiography has left those searching for closure back at square one: the quest for truth remains unfulfilled.

    It is frustrating that, after all these years, the story of June 12 is still told with so much distortion, coloured by biases and lies. Is there any hope that we will ever read a book that will finally provide answers to the lingering questions? Will we ever get closure, or will we remain trapped in this cycle of evasion, with Babangida’s autobiography leading us nowhere?

  • June 12, annulled dreams and the unending agony

    June 12, annulled dreams and the unending agony

    June 12, 1993 marked a significant setback for Nigeria, harking back to the January 15, 1966, coup-d’etat. This unfortunate event pushed the country back by at least a century, primarily due to the suspension of the 1963 Republican Constitution. Although the masterminds behind the coup never explicitly stated that they had abolished the constitution, the consequences of its suspension continue to manifest in Nigeria’s persistent underdevelopment.

    Ayo Ademiluyi, a civil rights lawyer and political activist, recently pointed out that the General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida government, similar to previous and succeeding military administrations, was characterized by diarchy. This system of governance, which combines the military top brass and parts of the political establishment, was more pronounced under IBB, as Babangida is known, than any other military administration. This diarchy was on full display during the publication and public presentation of a book, titled ‘A Journey in Service: An Autobiography of Ibrahim Babangida’, and fundraising for the Presidential Library, where startling revelations about Babangida’s military rule came to light.

    A gentleman on the podium stated that he and others present owed their success not to entrepreneurial spirit, but rather to state capture and favours. In contrast, entrepreneurs like Adeola Odutola, Louis Odumegwu Ojukwu, and Aminu Dantata from the previous era achieved success through genuine entrepreneurial zeal and innovation. Unfortunately, under Babangida’s regime, state favours became the primary means of economic advancement, leading to a society that is uncompetitive

    The concept of state capture, which originated in South Africa, was exemplified in Nigeria during the IBB era. However, for Nigeria to make progress, it should focus on promoting entrepreneurship among its citizens. Notable examples include Bayo Ogunlesi of Global Infrastructure, Olugbenga Agboola, Iyinoluwa Aboyeji and Adeleke Adekoya of Flutterwave, as well as Shola Akinlade and Ezra Olubi of Paystack. The new generation banks, led by individuals like Atedo Peterside and Fola Adeola, are also worth mentioning. Instead of promoting entrepreneurship, the IBB book presentation unfortunately celebrated an era marked by ‘man-know-man’ and ‘padi padi’ arrangements, commonly referred to as state capture. This approach will not make Nigeria competitive, create much-needed jobs, catalyze growth, or achieve sustainability.

    One of the most troubling aspects of the June 12, 1993, election saga is how Babangida inadvertently relinquished his authority as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. By refusing to uphold the mandate of the free and fair election, Babangida exhibited a cowardly cop-out, as noted by Reuben Abati in his column. Abati’s critique, however, stopped short of drawing a more profound conclusion. A more incisive analysis would have contrasted Babangida’s actions or inactions with those of Chile’s democratically elected President Salvador Allende Gossens, who made the ultimate sacrifice for his principles on a fateful night in 1973.

    In a tale of two leaders, Salvador Allende, a medical doctor-turned-president, stood in unambiguous contrast to General Ibrahim Babangida, who rose through the military ranks. When faced with a coup, Allende’s commitment to his people and his mandate was unwavering. Despite an American plane waiting to whisk him to safety, he opted to fight alongside his Chief of Staff and eleven ministers, refusing to give up their mandate. It’s one of the most remarkable arts in recent political history. So, who’s a ‘General’? Allende, a trained medical doctor, or Babangida, who entered the army straight from secondary school?

    Lieutenant Colonel Adekunle Fajuyi’s ultimate sacrifice for Major General JTU Aguiyi-Ironsi during the 1966 military coup in Nigeria also exemplified the enduring power of loyalty and duty in the face of overwhelming adversity. So, there’s no point in blaming General Sani Abacha, Augustus Aikhomu and others, who are no longer here to defend themselves; and dead men tell no tales! What’s more? IBB has simply shot himself in the foot, for, certainly, he has not presented himself as a Commander-in-Chief!

    The entire book presentation was clearly a jarring celebration, utterly disconnected from the somber reflections that events like the Holocaust or Soweto Massacre demand. As Peterside aptly noted, such tragedies cannot be commemorated amidst joviality. This is a very bad taste, which should not have happened. In sane climes, the occasion would have been an opportune moment to establish a Trust Fund for the countless individuals who suffered irreparable losses – lives, limbs, and livelihoods – due to the annulment. Many of these brave souls are still alive, struggling to rebuild their shattered lives.

    In this context, President Bola Tinubu, himself a victim of the annulment, has a unique opportunity to make amends. By setting up the Trust Fund, he can provide long-overdue rehabilitation and support to those who risked everything for democracy. This gesture would honour their sacrifices while allowing him to forge his own path, distinct from the shadows of the past, and create a more just and compassionate society. The last word is that, June 12, 1993, allowed the genie to escape from the bottle. All manners of long dormant and suppressed agitations came out of June 12 across the six geopolitical zones and the political will to resolve these issues has still not been found.

    In his 1852 book, ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon’, Karl Marx famously remarked: “History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.” As Marx pointed out, and as Babangida demonstrated, June 12, 1993, was a tragic event and the scars are still showing with broken limbs, disrupted lives and people suddenly becoming orphans. On the other side of the coin, the book presentation and the launch of a proposed Babangida Presidential Library was a pure farce.  

    Read Also: June 12 and IBB’s say nothing book

    Now that the book presentation has again highlighted the shame of a country, IBB can still hold his head high, not because of any personal merit, but because Nigeria’s flawed system often enables leaders to deflect accountability. This phenomenon is deeply ingrained in our national psyche, where the failures of leaders are frequently downplayed or even celebrated. Here, our justice system remains defective, yet society inexplicably applauds it. Nigeria’s complexities are well-known to those familiar with our unique brand of ‘Nigerianness’ – a reality marked by pervasive shock, anxiety, uncertainty and chaos. Our nation has become a contested territory, where the lives of countless individuals are being squandered amidst this turmoil.

    IBB’s ‘invented’ excuses have been a means to an end, but the question remains: what is that end? Now that he has exhausted his justifications for past inadequacies, what’s next? This raises questions about accountability and the lack of genuine introspection. But, wait a minute, the attendance of notable figures like Yemi Osinbajo, Nigeria’s former Vice President, and Bola Tinubu, the current president, at IBB’s event is also perplexing. While Tinubu’s presence might be attributed to diplomatic obligations, Osinbajo’s attendance is harder to justify, given his reputation as a democrat. Moreover, Tinubu’s participation in the laugh-it-off competition with the evil genius, a man often regarded as one of Nigeria’s most notorious leaders, is particularly jarring.

    Agreed, the dead are dead, and nothing can be done about that again! Twenty-six years after Nigeria’s return to democracy, it is essential to reflect on the sacrifices made by individuals like Abubakar Umar, who relinquished their military commissions, and others like Ambassador Musbau in Mushin-Lagos, who went totally blind during the agitations, all in support of the June 12 movement. How does the democratic system honour their memory and sacrifices? A former warlord reportedly advised Abacha to “hang” MKO Abiola, the winner of the June 12, 1993, presidential election, for treason. Ironically, his wife is now a Minister in Tinubu’s cabinet!

    So, ‘eni to ku ni tie gbe! Indeed, he who is dead has lost it all!

    May the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, grant us peace in Nigeria!

  • Beyond Babangida’s Abuja crowd

    Beyond Babangida’s Abuja crowd

    The make-up of Babangida’s Abuja crowd during the public presentation of his autobiography- ‘A Journey in Service ‘last week was in character with a leader who like ‘Maradona’ takes delight in devious scheming. On hand to give him solidarity were five of his fellow former military Heads of State who see manipulation of the governed as great asset. They all believe that government doesn’t need to ask what the governed want. Why are they leaders if they cannot dream for their people?

     The second group is made up of former products of Babangida’s school of democracy; he personally christened them ‘new breed’ politicians. They were from the onset forbidden from making contact with neither the past nor their corrupt leaders. Today, some are in the private sector while others have become part of our current governing class. The military is their role model and for them, government is about sharing spoils of war. They didn’t have problem raising N17billion towards the building a presidential library for their godfather, ex-President Babangida, accused by detractors of institutionalising corruption in Nigeria.

    Babangida, the self-styled evil genius, often obsessed with self-preservation, loves none but self. He is as selfish as he is self-centred. He is a leader with no abiding faith. Babangida was the leader who carried out a palace coup against his principal he accused of not carrying people along in decision making only for him to take IMF loan roundly rejected by Nigerians as shown by the result of a national survey he commissioned. Despite experts’ advice and general rejection of the Structural Adjustment Programme, it was embraced by Babangida even as the result was the turning of our country into a dumping ground for foreign manufactured goods from all over the world. And finally, the evil genius, thinking he knew what we want, took a multi-cultural and multi-religion nation like Nigeria into OIC without consulting Nigerians.

    This is why I think his last week act of contrition over his role in the June 12 1993 fiasco during the public presentation of his autobiography- ‘A Journey in Service’ was an assault on sensibilities of thousands of Nigerians beaten by and detained by the police or killed by soldiers while demonstrating in Lagos and across Nigeria against Babangida’s coup against the nation.

     For anyone who is familiar with the style of the ‘Maradona’ who dribbled the academia, the media that made him, and the traditional institutions that bestowed on him honours without end across Nigeria including the (Opu Omu Alabo), the chief war leader of Rivers, the Oka ome Eme (a man of his words of Enugu) and the Comforter of the Igbos), it is not difficult to dismiss his last week act of contrition over his June 12 1993 coup against Nigeria an assault on sensibilities of Nigerians

    And if one may ask, what is the Maradona apologizing for after blaming everyone else for the coup except self? As if the evil genius thinks he is still the Commander-in-Chief 32 years after Nigerians angrily chased him out office, he is identifying those Nigerians should hold responsible for the 1993 coup many believe he masterminded but executed by his friends. He has identified, Arthur Nzeribe, the Association to Better Nigeria (ABN), he admitted was his friend as the one who secured an illegal midnight judgment that threatened the conduct of the election; he named his Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Clement Akpamgbo who in clear violation of Decree 13, which barred any court from interfering with INEC’s conduct or scheduling of the elections, he said misadvised government and  Akpamgbo’s godson, Justice Ikpeme, whose Abuja High Court granted the ABN an injunction stopping NEC from conducting the June 12 elections.in the dead of night. Babangida also wants Nduka Irabor sanctioned. According to him the June 12 elections “was annulled on June 23, 1993 through “a terse, poorly worded statement from a scrap of paper, which bore neither the presidential seal nor the official letterhead of the government, read out by Nduka Irabor”.

    Unfortunately, Babangida forgot that in spite his current denials and buck passing, he validated, all the above decisions he now says were not approved through a public broadcast and press conference where he also laid out plan for his Interim National Government contraption.

     Sadly, Babangida, a common trickster thinks no one sees though his subterfuge. The other five perfidious generals who were out with him last week suffer from the same affliction

    But how did we get here?

    We are an endowed nation. At independence, Nigeria was seen as the hope of the black race. The East was rated as having the highest growing economy in the world, The West had television ahead of Belgium and Germany and was through welfarist policies including free education and free health services, was on the verge of creating an egalitarian society. Our dreams and hopes came into an abrupt end when ethnic irredentists turned the Nigerian Army into an army of balance of terror in 1966.

    It is precisely because Babangida style is not different from those of other Nigerian former generals that ruled us like conquered people that I want us to look beyond his Abuja crowd and interrogate how total disrespect for Nigerians by our successive military leaders from Aguiyi Ironsi to Abdulsalami Abubakar has brought the nation to her knees.

    Read Alao: Why Nigeria intervened in Liberia’s civil war, by Babangida

    First let us take a journey through memory to see how we got here.

    There was a military insurrection in January 1966. Ironsi who emerged as the new leader of the country in a moment of madness promulgated Decree 34 of 1966 that overnight turned a multi-cultural Federal Republic of Nigeria into a unitary state. Unitarism was a social system long canvassed by the Igbo ethnic group.

    The response of the north to unification was the July 1966 vengeance coup that led to the killing of many Igbo military officers, massacre of Igbo people in the north and eventual civil war.

    Gowon played the ethnic card by allowing himself to be railroaded into power in breach of espirit de corps of the military which favoured Brigadier Babafemi Ogundipe, then the most senior surviving military officer as Head of State. Of course, there wouldn’t have been any civil war but for Gowon’s refusal to abide by the terms of the Aburi Accord.

    Obasanjo also betrayed the country when he, as an umpire in the 1979 election, chose to support Shehu Shagari. The rest of the country viewed Obasanjo’s action as a form of payback to the northern hegemonic power that allowed him to succeed assassinated Murtala Mohammed in 1976.

    Buhari actually believed he could rule Nigeria without Nigerians’ consent.  In 1984, he treated northern politicians with kid gloves while he sent their southern counterparts who, as government, officially cornered contract commissions to build universities and health facilities for the mass of their people in Edo, Ondo, Ogun and Lagos to prison years ranging from 100 to 200.

    Besides stealing the country blind, Abacha, the maximum dictator ruled the country on his own terms. He waged war against Abiola and his Yoruba people while preparing himself for self-perpetuation

    Abdulsalami, besides imposing the 1999 Constitution regarded by many as Decree 24 as it was never discussed by Nigerians, believed he and other northern military officers that brought Obasanjo  out of prison, and imposed him as Yoruba preferred candidate and went on to work for his victory, have neither patience or respect for the sensibilities of the Yoruba people.

    The net effect of this on the nation was that at the birth of the fourth republic in 1999, there were no politicians with experience in parliamentary democracy or even or even the party system. What we had were military-baked new breed politicians that saw only the outgoing soldiers as role models.

    This was why Ayo Opadokun, a former NADECO chieftain, speaking on the legacies of Ayo Adebanjo and Pa Edwin Clark who died after lifelong struggle on Channels Television last week said he holds exception to being told our current political class are politicians. To him as well as to many other Nigerians, they are military apologists who since 1999 could not even guarantee the status of citizenship Nigerians enjoyed under colonialism especially in terms of constitutional engineering.

    As a way forward, Opadokun says President Tinubu who understands and has been part of the struggle for nation-building should engage the leaders of ethnic nationalities, the owners of Nigeria.

    I think it is time to stop playing the ostrich and let those who claim they don’t know the meaning of restructuring that it is a quest to return our country to a federal arrangement which most multi-cultural societies in the world believe guarantees unity in diversity.

  • Babangida and his 1966 non-Igbo coup epiphany

    Babangida and his 1966 non-Igbo coup epiphany

    Sir: If a 20-year-old student researcher had found, after methodical research, that the 1966 so-called Igbo coup was not an Igbo coup after all, that 20-year-old researcher would have been celebrated as an instant national hero. But when Ibrahim Babangida, an 83-year-old insider and eye witness to that 1966 event, makes similar declaration, he should not be viewed as a hero and truth teller; instead, the question should be asked: when did Babangida become aware of that piece of truth?

    Why has it taken Babangida almost 60 years to tell a piece of truth that he has known from day one? Even if he thought he would not have been believed if he had spoken his truth the day or months or a few years after the coup, because he didn’t think he had the clout, what about the eight years during which he occupied the highest seat and had the loudest megaphone in the country?

    Why did Ibrahim Babangida sit on a vital and critical piece of truth for 60 years? The Igbo had suffered and continue to suffer existentially as a result of the conspiratorial lies about that 1966 coup. Babangida knew that. He knew the truth in 1966, just as he knew the truth in 1976, 1986, 1996, 2006, 2016. He knew the truth in 2024. He knew the truth in the eight years he ruled the country as a military dictator. Why now? Why in 2025?

    Ibrahim Babangida has been around and has watched millions of Igbo killed, suffer incalculable property and economic losses, suffer the injustices and inequities of political isolation and marginalization, all because of the conspired and concocted lies of the 1966 coup being masterminded by young Igbo officers. Babangida knew the truth right from the jump but he chose to watch the lies fester and suppurate into a national cancer. Heck, he even took part in the civil war against the Igbo.

    Read Also: Natural Gas is bridge to Nigeria’s industrial future, says Optimera Energy

    So, what is an 83-year-old Babangida trying to accomplish by coming clean with all these confessional truths – the 1966 coup, the June 12 elections and MKO Abiola? Is Babangida’s inevitable mortality staring him in the face? Like the coward that he has admitted to being on this side, is Babangida also petrified of life of torture and torment on the other side? Is that what this whole epiphanous nonsense is about?

    The verdict is already in on Ibrahim Babangida’s caricature of a memoir. It is a vain desperate but disgusting attempt at revisionist history not worth any drop of ink wasted in publishing it. Nigerians are unanimous on that verdict. Well, almost unanimous, because you still have folks like Arthur Eze who made a complete fool of himself with that rambling and incoherent display at the book launch. Such an ignorant and disgraceful display of sycophantic and fawning desperation.

    So, even with his belated admissions and confessions, Babangida is not a hero, he has never been a hero, and will never be a hero. His comeuppance awaits, if not already upon him.

    But what about General Olusegun Obasanjo? What about General Jack Yakubu Gowon? What about General Muhammad Buhari? They are Babangida’s still-living historical contemporaries. Like Babangida, they saw 1966 coup up close and, perhaps, personal. Like Babangida, they have, at different times, ruled Nigeria after the 1966 coup. They have wielded the loudest megaphones in the country. And they have watched the Igbo bear the burden and suffer the consequences of a vile and malicious lie.

    Why didn’t they tell the truth about the 1966 coup? Why didn’t they debunk the deadly lie? Why haven’t they done that still? Gowon is 90-years-old; Obasanjo is 87, and Buhari is 82. What are they still waiting for? Will they take the truth, their truth, to their graves? We wait, as only time will tell.

    •Dr. Vitus Ozoke,United States.

  • Babangida’s June 12 confession: Can Nigerians ever forget his atrocious rule?

    Babangida’s June 12 confession: Can Nigerians ever forget his atrocious rule?

    • By Mobolaji Sanusi

    On Thursday, February 21, 2025, despotic retired General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida launched his book titled: “A Journey In Service-An Autobiography.” The book is obviously an attempt to appease almighty God, not any human being.

    As he revels in the twilight of his life and with the mindset that he’s currently enjoying an age bracket where going the mortal way is imminent, the fear of eluding aljannah if necessary atonement is forsaken here on earth cannot be overlooked.

    At his book presentation that was well attended by all known notable living victims of his misrule in Abuja, the demonic military ruler in Nigeria’s political history, for once , publicly expressed halfhearted contrition to wit: “I regret June 12. I accept full responsibility for the decisions taken and June 12 happened under my watch. Mistakes, missteps happened in quick succession. That accident of history is most regrettable. The nation is entitled to expect my expression of regret.”

    With those carefully crafted words in Babangida’s usual deceptive language come a sense of nostalgic feelings about an avoidable act of a military power monger that threw the country into a yet-to-be-overcome democratic and economic rigmarole.

    For Babangida, other power mongers and living creatures, time teaches the value of life but people only change when faced by compelling experience of life’s reality. The dawn of Babangida’s sad reality has arrived during his 83rd birthday celebration. And the truth about the acknowledgment of his criminal annulment of June 12, 1993 Presidential election that Bashorun Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola convincingly won has just been made by him. He has dodged this reality in his bid to preserve his pride and already badly dented leadership reputation for decades.

    In a country with contemporary generation of youths that lacked a veritable sense of their history, the depth of Babangida’s book launch might be taken with levity. To them, it’s not difficult to dismiss it as a routine, frequently embarked upon by political leaders masquerading as authors to garb history in their preferred clothes colour.

    What’s not impossible from the foregoing is the likelihood that Niccolo Machiavelli had Babangida and perhaps other Nigerian political gladiators in mind when he opined several decades ago: “Everyone sees what you appear to be, few experience what you really are.” For Nigerians that are old enough when Babangida was an imperial military ruler, the truth that his book launch audience failed to throw on his face is that he is one power-obsessed political monster who ruled this country and nearly ran it politically and economically aground.

    Read Also: Forgive Babangida over June 12, Ozekhome begs Nigerians

    With the assemblage of brilliant minds that he surrounded himself with during his imperial reign in power, he espoused astounding policy philosophy that he never embodied empirically. In actual fact, Babangida is an embodiment of the widely known cliche of leading by precept rather than example.

    Currently, the stark reality staring IBB in the face is reinforced by the fact that at the apogee of his political power, he failed to trust his instincts which are altruistic messages from his soul. He gleefully succumbed to pleasures of the flesh. And with his conscience giving him sleepless nights over his misrule over Nigeria and especially misdeeds to MKO Abiola, he has now grudgingly through his autobiography come out to half heartedly confessed the sad truth of how he deprived Nigerians the opportunity of having a president in Abiola that holds, till date, the record of winning an untainted election ever in the anal of presidential elections in this country.

    Rather than make direct regrets and pointed plea for forgiveness from his country patriots, IBB was busy passing buck on General Sani Abacha and Aikhomu through his secretary that he claimed released the annulment press statement while away in Katsina state, without his imprimatur. This is despite his knowing that both were not alive to defend themselves.

    Unfortunately and obviously in a deliberate strategic timing by Babangida, he ensured that most of those he orchestrated the devilish June 12, 1993 presidential annulment saga with; that could corroborate or debunked his lies including Arthur Nzeribe, Abimbola Davis, , Clement Akpamgbo, Justices Dahiru Saleh and Bassey Ikpeme, Professors Humphrey Nwosu and Omo Omoruyi and more importantly General Sani Abacha and Vice Admiral Augustus Aikhomu are all dead. That is vintage Babangida for young Nigerians to know.

    What is actually a take away from the chapter in his book dwelling on his journey to nowhere political transition policy is for Nigerians to stay away from IBB’s deceptively buck passing presentations by his acting like a victim in a problem he willfully created, inflicting indescribable anguish and despair on Nigeria/Nigerians in the process.

    IBB, through his gap-toothed deceitful smiles during his rulership of this country was loved but not trusted by millions of discernible Nigerians.

    Babangida’s recent confession is a confirmation of Benjamin Franklin’s aphorism that: “Life’s tragedy is that we get old too soon and wise too late.” The tragedy of IBB’s life and times as military ruler of this country is that he’s getting wise the fact. That is, after his willfully dastard political orchestration.

    Alexander the Great once said: “In the end, when it’s all over, all that matters is what you’ve done.” What matters to Nigerians with a dispassionate sense of history is that true statesmanship and reliable leadership are all over for IBB.                  All  that matters to us is not his belated confession but how he unforgettably messed up our political turfs with insincere policies and economic terrain through his insincere foreign induced Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) that led to devaluation of the Naira and abysmal craze for seeking and obtaining looted loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

    What is on records is that Nigerians tried to stop IBB’s political transition and economic journey-to-nowhere.

    Yours sincerely was at the time on the streets with other patriots to protest against his inimical policies and political abracadabra. Yours sincerely joined other patriotic journalists, writers and activists to write damning articles, editorials in newspapers but the ‘evil genius’ and his team of tyrants ignored us. No wonder that Thomas Paine once admonished that “A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.” Babangida and his team foisted themselves on us and held themselves accountable to none of us. Such a ruler’s narrative on June 12 annulment or plea for regret should not be believed.

    Despite Babangida’s dubious confession, his being weighed down by the pain of June 12 Presidential Election annulment regrets may yet not abate considering that this also led to his ignominiously being forced to step aside from power nearly 33 years ago.

    We can’t easily forget his statement that he was “not only in government but also in power. A statement he made to sternly warn millions that were and are still June 12 Presidential Election devotees protesting against his decision at that time. Babangida was ready to burn this country down even if he was to rule over its ashes with his undeniable obsession for power at that point in history.

    Seeing the way that especially victims of Babangida’s destructive torment are heaping glowing praises on him at his book launch, yours sincerely keeps reflecting over what the reactions of late patriots like MKO Abiola, Gani Fawehinmi, Beko Ransome-Kuti, Dele Giwa, Kudirat Abiola, Bagauda Kaltho and millions that were martyrs of struggles against Babangida’s tyranny will be in their graves.

    This in my humble view is the worst scenario created at the evil genius 83rd birthday book launch. Babangida might take solace in the divine injunction stating that “to err is human but to forgive is divine.”

    For most Nigerians with conscience, the injustice of June 12 criminal annulment and the cruel elimination of MKO Abiola can be aptly summed up by the words of Thomas Aquinas to wit: “No evil can be excused because it is done with a good intention,” not even on any phantom national security report. Herein lies the futility of Babangida’s half hearted regret at his book launch.

    • Sanusi, a journalist/corporate legal consultant wrote in this piece from Lagos.
  • IBB’s ‘Journey in Service’

    IBB’s ‘Journey in Service’

    Last Thursday’s public presentation of former military leader Ibrahim Babangida’s over 400 pages autobiographical book, ‘A Journey in Service’ unprecedentedly brought together all living Nigerian heads of state and presidents, except Muhammadu Buhari. Given how controversial the author’s reign was, it was thought he would never write his biography, despite promising to damn the consequences and publishing it. In the end, Nigerians waited for about 32 years to get the chance to read him, his thoughts, leadership, controversies, and justifications. No book has been so awaited, and no gathering in the past one or two decades has been so striking. There were many suppositions about him and his time in power; now, nearly all those suppositions have been dispelled. What is left, as the pages of the book unfurl before its readers, may not exactly meet the high expectations of a long wait.

    Other than the reviewer, former vice president Yemi Osinbajo, a professor of law, no one was sure on Thursday that any other person had read the book. In the next few weeks, thousands of people will have direct access to the book, and probably read it, for the author as well as the publishers, Bookcraft, have not gone to any length to restrict access to the book. It is widely available online. The purpose of writing the book was, therefore, obviously not to make money from its sales; it was to get as many people as possible to read it. It will be read in millions of homes, if not for its stylistic elegance, then perhaps for its revelations; or if not for what it reveals or fails to reveal, then perhaps to accentuate the displeasure millions of sceptics who wrote the former military leader off more than 30 years ago have felt for a long time.

    Former president Olusegun Obasanjo warned Gen. Babangida to expect harsh criticisms and blowback over the book. There would be tonnes of blunt, scathing and unflattering dismissals, he said languidly, in contrast to the jaunty steps with which he mounted the platform to give his goodwill remarks. All past and present leaders who said a few things about the author (whether he ghosted the work or not) had been mostly laudatory, whether anecdotes, wisecracks, or allusions. It is in the nature of tributes, either at birthdays or book launches, to be giddy and lyrical about the subject, sometimes saying things the speaker himself would find shocking to his practiced modesty. Prof Osinbajo tried valiantly to balance his review by appointing his allusions to do the work of giving the ‘on the other hand’. But his witticisms seemed more expiatory of the former military leader’s misrule than serve as a harmless and even rhetorical counterpoise. On his own, Chief Obasanjo, who has studiously refrained from speaking about MKO Abiola and June 12, took refuge in his warnings to the author to expect the worst. In the process, he masked and coded his displeasure behind his reservations, and generally sounded unenthusiastic about either his presence in the hall or what the book managed to reveal or hint.

    So many commentators have excoriated Gen. Babangida based on newspaper and social media snippets as well as the author’s brief remarks. They dismiss him, all over again as they did in the past, as overrated, both as a military general who displayed lack of courage in the face of his subordinate’s mutinous manoeuvres, and as a head of state who saturated the country with futile social and political experiments without deeply, positively and fundamentally effecting the fortunes of the country. He touched a number of individuals, mostly businessmen and jobholders, and they have remained eternally grateful; but he did little else. Indeed, of all those who have commented so far on the book outside the launch venue, there does not seem to be any who thought him a hero or a role model. They wish he had not written the book. Great reviews of the book will perhaps come in the weeks ahead, as soon as readers overcome the shock of what took place at the Transcorp Hilton venue. But the reviews are unlikely to be salutary or sympathetic to a man, general and leader who is at once stoical and Machiavellian.

    Read Also: Tinubu pledges support for fintech sector

    Gen. Babangida is also unlikely to care about the hostile and trenchant reviews, for he is too smart and sensitive not to know that he is robustly reviled in many parts of the country, especially in the South and Middle Belt. If he couldn’t be bothered by the unlawful dissemination of the book online, why would he wince at scurrilous attacks against his person or his leadership? For the nine years or so he was in office, and despite his best efforts to curry approval and heroic worship, he received bucketfuls of abuse and hostility. Yet, he bore everything with perfect equanimity. He is now in his twilight years, and he senses without saying it that the verdict of posterity is already sealed, and has in fact been sealed since 1993, regardless of whatever private exculpations he got from his supporters. At this point, therefore, the smooth-spoken and pretentiously genial general has lost all sense of caring. Given the platitudes reportedly redolent in his book, instead of honest admission of truths and uncomfortable facts and revelations, not to say the many reiterations of his presumptions and justifications, he obviously does not hope the book would deodorise his image. He meant the book for other purposes.

    That purpose was contained in the unveiling of his presidential library prototype, a concomitant of the book launch. The complex will cost billions of naira, N17bn or so of which was publicly raised last Thursday. It spoke to his popularity among a class of wealthy people, and the enduring fascination foes and friends alike still have for him, that when he called for donations, they overwhelmed him with cash. As they lathered him with donations and pledges, they also spoke fondly and wistfully of his time in office. He may not be able to explain his talismanic hold on this class of supporters, but he has an instinctive grasp of what he continues to mean to millions of Nigerians, particularly from the North. However, Southerners are so pissed off with him that they loath his book launch and describe as it as gratuitous insult to the sensibilities of ‘Nigerians’. Some of them are in fact so angry with him over how tragically his 1993 betrayal set the country back by many decades, that they do not trust him to tell the truth about his time in office or imagine he could ever be so altruistic as to care what fate befell the country.

    Yes, many people will take the trouble of reading his book in the weeks and months ahead, not because they care about him or think he has the capacity to analyse the country’s existential issues beyond his jaded philosophies and simplistic exonerations, but because they want to satisfy their curiosities, to find out whether he is not much worse than they had imagined. They will want to read for themselves whether they can find any context in the book to explain the widely presumed dichotomy between his regrets or acceptance of responsibility, which he offered fulsomely, and apologies for the poll annulment and execution of Gen. Mamman Vatsa, which he didn’t give explicitly. Many authors wracked by conscience often hide behind lexical facades; readers will want to peruse the book for themselves to see whether they could detect any stirring in his enfeebled gait, let alone his conscience.

  • Forgive Babangida over June 12, Ozekhome begs Nigerians

    Forgive Babangida over June 12, Ozekhome begs Nigerians

    Constitutional Lawyer and Civil Rights activist Prof. Mike Ozekhome has appealed to Nigerians to forgive former Military President, Gen. Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida for annulling the June 12, 1993 presidential election. 

    Babangida admitted in his book released on Thursday, February 20 that Chief MKO Abiola actually won the election, saying forces beyond him compelled him to annual the election. 

    In a statement titled: “Babangida’s confession and atonement: quo vadis,” Ozekhome said Nigerians should “let the wounds heal; let the heart melt; and let the spirit of national triumphalism prevail.”

    According to him:”I have carefully read and listened to former Nigerian military president, General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida’s public remorse and regrets over the atrocious annulment of the June 12,1993 presidential elections. He did this 32 whopping years later. 

    “I want to very quickly say that it takes a man with strong guts and balls and a man who has become repentant, born again and has seen the face of God to publicly recant his earlier wrongful deeds and offer public apology to the entire nation. This was no doubt meant to heal the wounds and balm wounded and bruised hearts. 

    “The polls, the best, most transparent and credible elections, ever held in Nigeria till date,were meant to end decades of military d The annulment threw Nigeria into turmoil and widespread unrest, protests, maiming and killings. 

    “This forced Babangida to “step aside”; the enthronement of the Ernest Shonekan’s Interim Government; and the arrest and detention of Chief Moshood Abiola, the presumed winner who later died in Aso Villa in questionable and suspicious circumstances. 

    “Of course, General Sani Abacha who was his second in command later sacked Shonekan in a bloodless coup. For years, IBB prevaricated on the annulment, claiming he did it in the best national interest. 

    “But on Thursday the 21st of February, 2025, Babangida during the presentation of his memoirs, “A journey In Service”, pointedly regretted in the public: “I regret June 12. I accept full responsibility for the decisions taken and June 12 happened under my watch. Mistakes, missteps happened in quick succession. That accident of history is most regrettable. The nation is entitled to expect my expression of regret. 

    “And wait for it:: he acknowledged for the first time that Abiola won the elections fair and square, trouncing his major opponent, Alhaji Bashir Tofa.

    “I want to salute Babangida for having the courage and humility to own up like a man; that everything that happened during the June 12 crisis took place under him as the head of state and the president who was also the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. 

    “I salute him for acknowledging that his government which actually organised unarguably the freest, fairest and most credible elections in the electoral history of Nigeria when it introduced option A4 from electoral books that were hithenlrto unknown to Nigeria or to the world. 

    “But unfortunately, regrettably like he now admits, he again turned around to annul the same elections in a way that was most bizarre, curious and unnatural.

    Read Also: IBB under fire over new position on June 12

    “To me, that he has come out to open up to doing something wrong and egregious to a bleeding nation should be appreciated. I believe that Nigerians should forgive him because to err is human and to forgive is divine ( Eph 4:32 ). 

    “I personally have now forgiven him because I was also a victim of the June12 crisis. It threw up all manners of challenges to me as a person, where in my very youthful age; in my thirties, I found myself marching on the streets of Lagos every day- from Ikeja bus stop roundabout, to Ikorodu road; up to Tejuosho market; from there to Ojuelegba, Surulere; to Mushin; to Shomolu and Igando, Alimosho. 

    “Everyday, we were on the streets, protesting the mindless annulment. Some of us were killed in process; some were lucky enough to escape abroad on self exile. But some of us- very few indeed- refused to flee our dear country; we stayed back. 

    “We stared at the military eyeball to eyeball. We challenge authority and spoke truth to power. We challenged impunity and repression. I suffered several detentions across different detention centres. 

    “I virtually could not find means of livelihood for my youthful family because I was profiled, my phones bugged and no briefs were coming in. But I personally forgive him because it takes tons of guts to make public confession of having erred and atone for same as he has now done.

    “It is confession that leads to penance and penance leads to restitution and then forgiveness. If Babagida were to die today, I believe that he will see the face of God because he has prayed God to forgive him; and he has prayed Nigerians to forgive him.

    “Beyond that historic and epochal mistake of the annulment of the June 12 election which constitutes his original sin,let me place it on record that Babangida is one of the greatest presidents that Nigeria ever had in terms of his ingenuity, rulership mantra; ideas for national resurgence; ideas that contributed greatly to nation-building. 

    “These were aside the IMF-induced loans and pills which he introduced and which we again valiantly fought against successfully. 

    “Babangida it was who gave birth to the Federal Capital Territory and laid the solid foundation for virtually everything you see there today. His government was peopled by intellectuals and not by half illiterates and quacks. He recognized and used intellects. 

    “He was luminous and he built bridges of understanding, friendship and brotherhood across Nigeria. Nigerians,please, accept IBB’s confession and forgive him his sin of annulling the June 12,1993 elections. Let the wounds heal; let the heart melt; and let the spirit of national triumphalism prevail.”