Tag: Bala Usman

  • Remembering Bala Usman

    Remembering Bala Usman

    • By Bishir Dauda Sabuwar

    Sir: Today, Tuesday, September 23 marks 19 years since the demise of a historian par excellence, and a social crusader, Dr. Yusufu Bala Usman.

    Bala Usman was a critic of capitalism and neo-liberalism. He wrote and presented many seminal papers in which with facts and figures, he identified neo-liberal economic policies as inappropriate to African countries, including Nigeria. He also interrogated and challenged theories put forward by western and liberal scholars. For instance, in his classic book, For the Liberation of Nigeria, Dr. Bala argued that poverty in Nigeria cannot be explained by the theory of scarcity. According to him, the dog eats dog system that exacerbates exploitation of the masses, fuels corruption and filthy wealth accumulation by a class of tiny elites, is the reason for widespread poverty in Nigeria. He rightly accused the Nigerian ruling class of being agents of imperialism. They are intermediaries who fed fat on the national cake through exploitation and expropriation.

    When Nigeria under the military dictatorship of Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, wanted to collect IMF loan, Dr. Yusufu Bala Usman was amongst the foremost activists who expressed genuine resistance. He authored a book titled: Nigeria Against the IMF: The Home Market Strategy. He condemned the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) with its attendant massive job losses, currency devaluation, collapse of the manufacturing sector, dependency, among others.

    Read Also: Senate, House opt for joint probe of oil sector

    Instead of Nigeria’s continuous implementation of copied policies that over time failed to work, Dr. Bala proposed an alternative economic system which he called “Home Market Strategy”. This involved shifting from focusing more on exporting raw material to the western capitals to a more inward-looking oriented economy whose focus was more on harnessing local resources to meet local needs. He coherently showed how Nigeria could become a self-sufficient nation in everything.

    The home market strategy is very relevant even today and if it is implemented, will lessen Nigeria’s dependency on foreign products, break the vicious debt circle, revive our manufacturing industries, strengthen our currency, etc.

    I hope our leaders at all levels will study the Home Market Strategy and make use of the lofty recommendations therein to tackle the challenges facing our country.

    •Comrade Bishir Dauda Sabuwar,

    Unguwa Katsina.

  • Bala Usman elected vice chair of IMO committee

    The Managing Director of the Nigerian Ports Authority, Hadiza Bala Usman, was at the weekend unanimously elected as vice chairperson of the Facilitation Committee (FAL) of the International Maritime Organisation, (IMO).

    A statement by NPA’s General Manager, Corporate and Strategic Communications, Jatto Adams, said her tenure is from 2019-2020. The IMO is the United Nations agency responsible for the safety and security of shipping and the prevention of pollution by ships.

    Bala Usman, who is also Vice President, African Region of the International Association of Harbour and Ports (IAPH), was formally elected and inaugurated at the end of the week long 43rd Session of the FAL Committee in London.

    The Facilitation Committee, which is currently chaired by Mrs. Marina Angsell from Sweden, works together with the 173-member states of the organisation to ensure the observance of all the conventions and protocols that ensure the safety and security in the shipping business as well as the environment. She promised to work with other members of the committee to sustain the IMO ideals.

  • Apapa gridlock: Fed Govt may revoke port concession agreement

    As stakeholders blame shipping companies, others for bedlam

     

    The federal government might revoke the seaports concession agreement it entered with terminal operators during the administration of President Olusegun Obasanjo.

    Minster for Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi said this on Thursday during the stakeholder meeting on the lingering bedlam occasioned by activities of truck drivers to and fro Apapa seaport.

    The meeting which was chaired by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo (SAN), was held at the headquarters, Western Naval Command  (WNC), Apapa.

    According to Amaechi, he would submit the issue to the Federal Executive Council  (FEC) for a possible revocation of the concessions because the concessionaires were not sticking to the terms of operation.

    He said: “Concessioners not sticking to terms of agreement. We might have to go back to the FEC to ask for a revoke of the concessions. We are currently reviewing the concession agreement.”

    Meanwhile, stakeholders at the meeting blamed the shipping companies, tankfarm owners as well as the federal ministry of works for the congestion, noting that while the company and tankfarm operators had refused to operate holding bays for their trucks, the ministry was too slow in repairing bad portions of the roads.

    Read Also: Apapa gridlock: Lagos suspends approval for tank farms

    They also accused the shipping companies of deliberately fuelling the traffic through its demurrage policy, which makes empty containers flood the roads so that they could beat deadlines and collect their money.

    According to the Managing Director, Nigerian Port Authority (NPA), Hajiya Bala Usman, the shipping companies were acting in disregard of the law.

    She said: “The attendant disregard by shipping companies to patronize holding bays cannot be tolerated. Shipping companies are not above the law in Nigeria and they must act in accordance with the law.

    “We have sanctioned three shipping companies, which are among the largest operating in Nigeria. We withdrew their licenses for 10 days. Upon the review of their 10 days suspension, it was extended to additional five days. Presently, they do not have vantage services within Nigeria.

    “We have noted the concerns about empty containers. What we need to do is ensure that the same volume of containers that come into the country go out.

    “Shipping companies have over the years, made Nigeria a dumping ground. They have also instituted a fee where by, every importer is rushing into the port to drop their containers or risk losing their money.

    “Shipping companies are refusing the operationalisation of holding bays. Ordinary, when you import goods, the empty containers should be returned to the holding bays of the shipping companies. It is their responsibility to move it from the bays to the port.

    “The shipping companies are not above the law. We will keep sanctioning them until they comply and operationalize their business. The container repositioning fee they newly introduced is not acceptable. “The Vice President has written to us demanding clarity and we have cleared that nobody should pay for empty container repositioning. We need to define a location and day, possibly Saturdays and Sundays, where empty containers are moved into the port locations in preparation for them to be taken out to the vessels.

    “Nigerian government would not continue to absorb the cost of your none operationalisation of holding bays. Sixty percent of the trailers on our roads are empty or hawking. They come out without having any business and hope to secure one. “So, NPA is working on licencing trailer parks. In fact, only trailers from such parks can come into the port. We have received four proposals on that and we are working in collaboration with Lagos State Government. The trailers would be at the parks and only come out when called upon.

    “Then, truck owners’ association must ensure compliance of their members. Any truck found idle on the road would be impounded and the association dealt with.”

     

     

  • Bala Usman: NPA committed to improving Delta ports

    Bala Usman: NPA committed to improving Delta ports

    The Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA)  remains commit-ted to improving the patronage of Delta ports to boost public revenue, its Managing Director Ms Hadiza Bala Usman has said.

    Speaking with The Nation on the sideline of the just-concluded stakeholders’ forum organised by the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) in Warri, Delta State, Ms Usman assured shippers, exporters, stakeholders and other operators that the agency will stimulate economic activities in the area.

    She said the meeting was part of the Federal Government’s efforts through the NPA, NIMASA, the Nigerian Shippers’ Council and other agencies to reposition the seaports for rapid economic activities.

    Sources at the Delta port told The Nation that NPA has repaired some of the Tug Boats and a Pilot Cutters to facilitate trade and boost efficiency at ports.

    Delta Shippers’Association (DELSA) President Dr Austin Egbegbadia said the Delta ports are strategically located to enhance the growth and development of the economy.

    Egbegbadia identified the following as the potential of the port: The distance for moving cargoes to catchment states of Anambra, Imo, Enugu, Edo, Kogi, Abuja, Benue, Katsina and Kano is short compared with other operational ports; it gives the shippers the benefits of choice as Delta port manages four standard location, despite the challenges; the port can generate its cargoes and has excellent delivery of cargo; its turnaround time for vessels is excellent; quick identification and documentation of cargoes and security of cargoes is guaranteed and adequate modern facilities to handle various cargoes are assured by the concessionaires.

    While allying the fear of importers and exporters, he said the group had decided to promote the ports to boost merchant shipping and add significant value to the economy of the region as far as non-oil exports are concerned.

    “Some of the challenges we are facing is the erroneous perception that the Delta ports are unsafe to both local and international investors. This hype is largely fermented by mischievous elements whose sole purpose is to draw some sort of gain by such derogatory news,’ he said.

    Egbegbadia called for the dredging of the Escravos Bar that leads into the Warri ports, saying this would lead to job creation and wealth creation.

    Meanwhile, the government is set to automate ports operations across the country, NIMASA Director-General, Dr Dakuku Peterside has said .

    Speaking at the stakeholders’ meeting, Peterside said this would assist the government to reduce human contact and corruption, and promote transparency in the industry.

    The theme of the event was: “Implementation of Executive Order One (1) – Ease of Doing Business in a secure maritime environment”.

    In a communiqué at the end of the meeting, the stakeholders agreed on the following: The Ministry of Transportation and its agencies should explore alternate financing windows, such as the establishment of Maritime Bank to address the financing gap created by the unsuitability of lending rates of banks for the shipping business; revive NIMAREX as a platform for bridging the gap between the shipping industry and prospective international investors to provide impetus for growth and investment.

    Others are that government agencies should address the challenge of under-declaration of cargo at ports to plug revenue leakage. It should seek the dredging of the Escravos Bar to facilitate the access of large dry cargo vessels into Warri ports, they added.

    The stakeholders said the government should collaborate with the maritime communities to rely on their  knowledge and intelligence for fighting maritime crimes, such as piracy, sea robbery and vessel hijack.

    For manpower development and capacity building, the stakehol-ders said the government should consider a return to the former system, where the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), National Inland Waterways Agency (NIWA) and the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) contributed to the training of Master Mariners who are 180 with over 75 per cent above the retirement age.

    They also said the government should establish transit parks for trucks waiting to access the ports and implement an automated call-up system that prevents their proliferation around the ports to resolve the gridlock in Apapa.

     

  • El-Rufai warns IPMAN members against unruly behaviour

    El-Rufai warns IPMAN members against unruly behaviour

    Gov. Nasiru El-Rufai of Kaduna State has urged members of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria ( IPMAN ) in the state to end the bickering among them and live in peace.

    The governor said in Kaduna when he received newly elected officials of the association who paid him a courtesy visit that the government would not condone any breach of the peace.

    According to him, it is mandatory for members of the association to be given the opportunity to elect their leaders, saying those not satisfied with the election should seek redress in court.

    “Those who are not satisfied with the election should to go to court instead of causing chaos in the state,’’ the governor said.

    El-Rufai stressed that peace was vital for the progress of the association and assured of the government support to the new leadership.

    Earlier, the new state IPMAN Chairman, Alhaji Bala Usman acknowledged that the association was unable to hold election for a long time due to internal crisis.

    He however said with the elections held on Oct. 21, the association was now poised to contribute more meaningfully to the state economy.

    Usman expressed gratitude to the governor for ensuring that the election was peaceful, and pledged that the association would henceforth pay its annual ground rent to government without delay.

    The chairman pleaded with the governor to intervene on their behalf, for the reopening of their secretariat sealed by the management of Kaduna Refining and Petrochemical Company, due to the prolonged crisis in the association.

    Other officials elected include Alhaji Garba Jega as Vice Chairman and Mr Solomon Ehizogie as Secretary.

    NAN

  • Towards the economic liberation of nigeria: Bala usman’s enduring relevance

    Towards the economic liberation of nigeria: Bala usman’s enduring relevance

     We gather today in deep respect and appreciation. This nation owes an unredeemable debt to DR. YUSUFU BALA USMAN.  His love for Nigeria had no exception.

    He cared for us all, the great and the lowly, the rich and the modest, the arrogant and the humble, those from the North, South, East and West. Moslem and Christian.

    The beam of his keenintellect was only equalled by the glow of his humanity.

    1. It has been a decade since the great teacher, researcher, thinker, writer, polemicist, nationalist and pan-Africanist left us to enter into eternity on September 24, 2005.

    Yet, the light of his incandescent life continues to shine brightly, showing present and future generations the path to personal and national greatness.

    This unique and distinguished institution, the Centre for Democratic Development, Research and Training (CEDDERT) founded by Dr. Bala Usman is an enduring testament to his rare spirit and vision.

    I commend the management and staff of CEDDERT for holding aloft Bala Usman’s banner of commitment to truth, equity, human nobility and justice.

    1. I thank the organisers of this event for considering me worthy to deliver this keynote address. It is an unalloyed honour.

    Let me say that Dr. Bala Usman was no stranger to me.

    I recall with nostalgia how hard he worked and how we joined hands in common purpose to help achieve the late Chief M.K.O. Abiola’s emphatic victory in the historic June 12, 1993, Presidential election.

    So committed was Bala Usman to democratic restoration in Nigeria that he translated Chief Abiola’s manifesto, ‘Farewell to Poverty”, into Fulfude.

    4.Reflecting upon that momentous election which might have changed the course of our history had it been allowed to hold, I must sound a caution for our times.

    Bala Usman would have been pleased by the result of this year’s contest. It presents a chance for Nigeria to renew its march toward progress based on the ideals Usman espoused.

    This change requires more than a change in policies; it requires a change in politics; it requires a change of heart.

    5.While we have put forth a new government, too many of us who should be allied in changing the prospects of this nation have failed to put forth a new politics.

    They remain mired in the broken ways of yesterday, placing every conceivable personal interest above the national concern.

    Had we allowed such blindness to rule us, we never would have accomplished the historic merger that led to election victory and this opportunity for progressive change.

    What we accomplished was based on a matrix of sacrifice and cooperation. I have sacrificed much for this day to come to pass.Thus, I want this day to endure.

    I have done so by placing the welfare of Nigeria above my own advancement. I have done so because it is a lesson Bala Usman taught us every day of his life.

    Those who consider themselves his students should do so not only while reading his books but also in our actions.  The proof of our collective endeavour is not to be found in the word but in the deed.

    We must remain united in cause – the development of this nation — and must do so from beginning to end.

    6.You see,  Dr. Yusufu Bala Usman was an intellectual not for the sake of intellectualism. He was an intellectual because he understood knowledge was the most vital weapon a besieged nation and its people could acquire.

    Knowledge dismisses the fetters of poverty that many people come to mistake for the natural order of things.

    His love of people and wisdom led him to see the economy we were given was not the economy intended for us.

    We had become the victims of an unfair economic architecture arising from an unjust history.

    1. Bala Usman accepted a profound, unique mission. He sought to emancipate us from the yoke of the past, all the time warning that old forms of oppression would give birth to new forms of the inhumane contest for dominion of man over man, nation over nation.

    Colonialists might leave; but the injustice they spawned would reshape itself into the imperfections of an independence nominally gained but superficially evolved.

    Nigeria was declared a nation. But of nationhood, little was to be found.

    We were an independent country but our economy remained the appendage of others. We lived in the shadows of global forces that mocked our economic freedom and democracy.

    The nation trembled and stumbled because we were always unsure, afraid or both.

    We never knew whether the shadows were our own harmless reflection or that of a force with motives and means sinister to our development.

    8.The title of this address, “Towards the Economic Liberation of Nigeria: Bala Usman’s Enduring Relevance”, is patterned on Bala Usman’s 1980 landmark publication ‘For the Liberation of Nigeria’.

    In that book, he wrote: “Whatever specific issue or subject they may deal with all these lectures and articles have a single and common engagement.

    They are all about the liberation of the people of Nigeria from western imperialist domination at the national and international levels.”

    Dr. Bala Usman’s activities as an academic and activist were motivated by his ardent commitment to the complete political and economic liberation of Nigeria as the precursor for the emancipation of Africa and the black man everywhere.

    1. Ideas he espoused over the decades apply with ever-greater force today. Here I give clear warning.

    I do not aim to pay gentle tribute to man so that you may politely applaud once I sit down. Then we all depart upon our merry way as if nothing profound awaits our economic future.

    Or, worse, as if the works of Bala Usman are intellectually stimulating but have no practical application to the situation at hand. I reject that notion.

    The truth always has relevance. Meanwhile there are many great untruths this nation must erase before they turn our desire for a better Nigeria into something counterfeit.

    Unless we embrace the truths that shaped the prescriptions of Bala Usman, Nigeria will remain a land of false mirrors, where we look at ourselves but see something else, a land of past potential but with its future gone astray.

    Look, we have expended much too much money to purchase the poverty we now endure. Poverty should be much cheaper than what we suffered to pay for it.

    10.Whether his thoughts on the Economic Crisis facing Nigeria, or the Manipulation of Religion for political advantage or his analysis against foreign economic oppression as espoused in his stance against the IMF loan in 1985,

    Bala Usman traded only in truth and honesty at a time when neither honesty nor truth was the expected currency of our political discourse.

    For decades, Nigeria has danced in close confines with economic disaster. In the past, higher oil prices allowed us to dodge the worst.

    We have survived but not thrived. Improvised but not planned. Spent but not invested. Laughed, drank and feasted but did not build, construct or maintain.

    Now, Nigeria has collided into a wall, merciless and immovable.  The present downturn in oil prices may be more than a slump in the business cycle.

    Global economic, geopolitical and technological currents suggest the price drop may be a long-lasting secular development.

    11.To maintain market share and influence on the global market, Saudi Arabia keeps production high and prices low.

    Should Saudi Arabia slacken production in a material way, North American production may escalate and even seek to capture a share of the export market from Saudi and Russia.

    We also note that China is investing considerably in domestic and renewable energy sources. All this means that oil supply is high while demand has flat-lined due to flaccid global economic activity. We will be collateral damage in all of this. However, to us, the damage will not feel collateral. It will be central and it will be hard.

    Even during the best of times and high oil prices, the economic model upon which Nigeria is based has poorly served us. That model has precluded broadly-shared development.

    The only things its continuity promises are perpetual poverty for most Nigerians and the forfeiture of the best of our economic promise.

    Nigeria needs economic liberation.

    Before we can free our economy, we must free ourselves of the economic myths consigning us to our current predicament.

    To achieve this objective we must return to Dr. Bala Usman. Confronted by the harsh realities of dwindling national revenue occasioned by crashing oil prices, saddled with collapsed infrastructure and an abused and wary citizenry, Nigeria demands a new paradigm.

    Here, I must give the Nigerian people their just due.  They had a stark and important choice to make during the 2015 election.  They could have re-elected the government in place. This would have been the easier thing to do.

    Yet, in matters of state and governance, the easiest thing is rarely the right one.  Re-electing that administration would have lowered the curtain on our future.

    The last government had become threadbare of ideas. They intended to handcuff the people to the mast of austerity, then command that we ride out the storm. Their hope was that the storm would quickly pass.

    They forget that economic storms are mostly man-made. Thus, it takes man to unmake them.

    12.President Buhari is an earnest leader who seeks to give Nigerians the lives we deserve by giving us a the vibrant economy and uncompromised security.  My faith in his commitment to help the people is deep and abiding.  He is on the right path and I have faith that he will continue to follow it.

    That said, the task before us, is grave and daunting.  With oil prices having declined so steeply, the question becomes how must the federal government shape fiscal policy so that we achieve optimal economic production and employment under the given circumstance?

    Last year, I published an open letter to then President Jonathan. My critique of his economic policies was informed by the fact that the Nigerian economy had entered a critical stage.

    His government was set to foist austerity on the people.  This equated to pulverizing their already bruised economic circumstance.

    Although, we were in the throes of an election, I thought it is vital that we offer even our opponent the best advice we could give.

    He was our president at the time and our overall welfare was in the balance.  His failure would be our deepening poverty. Today because he didn’t heed the genuine advice we are faced with a threatening depression.

    Let me recall my opening statement.

    “No matter who is in power, we must do whatever is in our capacity to do, to steer the nation away from economic woes. The people have suffered too much hardship already”.

    I submitted that Nigeria’s economy was indistinguishable from one in the state of a chronic depression.

    1. The contours of the economic challenge facing government must be clearly postulated so that we see the vastness between where we are and where we should be.

    The first order of business is fiscal in nature. Do we continue to peg our naira expenditures to our dollar intake or do we affix our domestic expenditure to a measure more apt to grow the economy?

    To continue to link the government’s naira expenditure to dollar intake is to allow the decisions of foreign actors to hold undue influence over our fiscal policy. There is no logical necessity that foreigners’ taste for oil must determine our fiscal expenditures.

    While no economy is completely independent, this linkage amounts to servitude so restrictive that it is as if the colonial tether was never severed.

    Some will say the dollar linkage is fiscal prudent or they defend the practice by asserting this is the way we have always done it. But haven’t we also always fallen short?

    This is not prudence. It is the strange vocation of being pennywise yet pound foolish. Perpetuating this linkage will confine us to the single-commodity economic model in such a manner making us further delude ourselves that we must adhere to this linkage even more. All the while, our national privation will become our main growth industry.

    The second order of business has to do with the extent to which government helps direct and encourage private sectors activity. Do we allow ourselves to be slaves to the forces of the market even though we know that the market itself is not free?

    Or do we engage in some level of national industrial, infrastructure and employment planning, as has every large and important nation that has ever achieved prosperity – from England, to the United States to China?

    Regarding fiscal policy, I advocate the close dollar linkage be explicitly broken. The last I looked, Nigeria operates a Naira-based economy, not a dollar-based one.

    The last I looked, the federal government has the sole power and sovereign right to issue naira or financial guarantees based thereon. It does not need the approval of the American Federal Reserve, the Bank of England or of the host of global oil buyers.

    There is no innate legal or moral restriction strictly limiting the amount of Naira or the value of Naira-denominated guarantees placed in the system to spawn employment to match the amount of dollars collected via oil sales.

    Oil is a passive asset in the ground. When cash-strapped yet in need of more revenue presently, a nation should also consider issuing guarantees on the future oil shipments on a price certain paid now; or selling a portion of its equity in the joint ventures.

    Some may call this a variant of an oil futures. Whatever it is called, it should be considered particularly as a measure to improve our foreign currency position.

     

  • Bala Usman: The manipulation of religion in Nigeria

    It is remarkable that the late Dr. Bala Usman’s book, ‘The Manipulation of Religion in Nigeria: 1977-1987’, was published in April 1987. Yet, over two and a half decades after, the problem of religious intolerance and violence remain as virulent and destabilizing as ever in contemporary Nigeria. Interestingly, the prologue to the book is an instructive excerpt from a speech made on 22nd June, 1981, by Alhaji Abdulkadir Balarabe Musa, who was then Governor of Kaduna State and it reads: “Our state is at the heartland of the northern parts of this country, in every sense of history and culture, economically and politically. But we do not belong to the retrograde north of feudalists, slave-holders, crooks, parasites and foreign agents. We are of the cultured north of democracy, liberation and social progress for all the people of Nigeria”. This prologue reflects the spirit in which Bala Usman’s book was written. Incidentally, Dr. Usman served as Secretary to the Kaduna State Government during Governor Balarabe Musa’s tenure. Like his earlier book, ‘ For The Liberation of Nigeria’, which we reflected on last week, ‘The Manipulation of Religion in Nigeria’, is a collection of lectures, essays and letters written and delivered over a decade on the question of religion and the national cohesion, viability and stability of Nigeria. It must be said that these two books were attempts by Dr. Usman to reach beyond the Ivory Tower and enable a wider cross section of Nigerians to understand and appreciate the real roots of their country’s protracted socio-economic and political underdevelopment. Those who are interested in Dr. Usman’s more academically substantial work in his sphere of specialization, history, will have to consult the relevant journals and his more theoretically rigorous publications.

    Some of the incidents of religious violence that Dr. Usman analysed and clinically dissected in his book include the Maitatsine uprising in Kano City from 18th to 29th December, 1980 leading to the loss of 4,177 lives; the Bulukuntu riots in Maiduguri from 28th to 30th October, 1982 with a death toll of over 400 persons; the acrimony that attended the Sharia debate in the run up to the second republic; the attempt to read religious meanings into the assassination of General Murtala Mohammed and the riots in Kaduna from Friday, 29th to Saturday, 31st October, 1982 as well as the violent demonstration in Sabon Garin, Kano by the Muslim Students Society on Saturday, 30th October, 1982. Dr. Usman’s commentary on the last incident is significant and deserves to be quoted in full. In his words, “…Only two people were killed according to newspaper reports. But the great significance of this incident is that it involves for the first time, the calculated destruction and burning of Christian churches in what seems to be a violent assertion of the ‘Islam Only’ slogan painted all over the streets of Zaria in an aggressive demonstration by the Muslim Students Society in 1980. The attack on and destruction of Christian churches in Sabon Garin Kano, marks the highest and most dangerous, point this systematic manipulation of religion has reached in its opposition to the unity of the people of this country”. This dispassionate analysis reflects the fierce patriotism and selflessness of Bala Usman, himself a Hausa/Fulani and Muslim.

    Over two and a half decades after the publication of Dr. Bala Usman’s book, the attack on churches in various parts of the North has become routine courtesy the Boko Haram insurgent group. Religious fundamentalism both of the Muslim and Christian varieties have become more deeply entrenched in Nigerian society. But does Dr. Usman’s theory of manipulation still explain the phenomenon of religious intolerance and violence in contemporary Nigeria? I believe it does even if the context and mechanisms of the manipulation have changed in a number of ways. Bala Usman defines manipulation as “essentially controlling the action of a person or group without their that person or group knowing the goals, purpose and method of that control and without even being aware that a form of control is being exercised on them at all”. Thus, Dr. Usman links the manipulation of religion in Nigeria to the ever deteriorating material living conditions of millions of Nigerians and the few ruling class elements who benefit from the unjust status quo. According to him, “Within Nigeria, millions of Nigerians are increasingly realising that the present economic and social system in this country has nothing for them except landlessness, indebtedness, unemployment, destitution, disease, illiteracy and chronic and pervasive insecurity”. He thus sees the perpetrators of this exploitative and iniquitous system as the prime perpetrators of manipulation who “cover themselves with religious and ethnic disguises in order to further entrench division among our people”.

    Since Dr. Usman penned these words, Nigeria has slipped into a deeper socio-economic morass. Unable to find a way out of a quagmire that is largely a function of their own greed and parasitism, factions of the ruling class, easily resort to manipulating ethnic, religious and regional sentiments to legitimate their otherwise tenuous hold on power. Is this not the best way, for example, to explain the ferocity with which some northern governors at the beginning of this political dispensation in 1999 pursued the Sharia agenda in utter contempt for the supposed secularity of the Nigerian State? Are those who willingly turn themselves into suicide bombers on behalf of Boko Haram not victims of the kind of manipulation Bala Usman talks about? Are the king-pins of Boko Haram themselves within Nigeria not most likely unwitting victims of external religious extremists who perceive the Nigerian ruling class as siding with neo-imperial forces in the war against terrorism and are thus working clandestinely for a religious-driven implosion of the country? Is it not a strong possibility that the millions of ordinary Muslim northerners who reportedly have some sympathy for Boko Haram, not victims of a psychological manipulation that convinces them that their existential material conditions will dramatically improve with the emergence of a theocratic Islamic state?

    If Dr. Bala Usman were alive today, he would certainly not be silent in the face of the on-going Boko Haram debacle. He would use his intellectual prowess to explain the foundational issues to the masses and help ensure the restoration of sanity. For instance, after the 6th March, 1987, religious riots that rocked most of the major cities and towns of Kaduna resulting in the destruction of churches, mosques, hotels, cinemas, businesses and vehicles, Dr. Usman mobilized 21 other academic colleagues at the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, to issue a strongly worded statement published in the New Nigerian on the 20th March, 1987, and The Guardian on the 25th March 1987. The academics were unequivocal in their demand: “We call on the Federal Military Government to shed all ambiguities and hesitation, and to declare and reaffirm that the Nigerian State is SECULAR and one of its most fundamental responsibilities is to protect the right of every citizen and resident to practice the religion of their choice. We call on the Federal Military Government to implement this decisively and clearly by identifying publicly and punishing according to the law, all the rich and powerful individuals who are known to be behind the campaign of violent religious politics aimed at destroying our country…We are convinced that the sinister and utterly reactionary forces behind this campaign of violent religious politics with the aim of destroying our country are made up of a tiny oligarchy determined to maintain its power, wealth and privileges at all costs including violent and well organized mobs in the name of religion”. Some two and a half decades after, do these words not still speak to us so poignantly today?

  • Bala Usman: The man who saw tomorrow

    It was the radical and unrepentantly progressive journalist, Mr. Kayode Komolafe, who sometime in 2005 intimated me about the tragic death of the great Marxist historian and political economist, Dr. Bala Usman, whose encyclopaedic knowledge, incisive, unpretentious analysis and passionate commitment to social justice had such a decisive impact on a whole generation of Nigerian intellectuals, thinkers and writers. Although I was not privileged to be his student at the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, where Dr Bala Usman researched, wrote and taught all his life, his writings played a crucial part in my mental development and progressive social consciousness. I was indeed undergoing my national youth service in Lagos when I came across Dr. Usman’s land mark book, ‘For The Liberation of Nigeria’ which had actually been published in 1980. As the title of the work suggests, it was a collection of about thirty lectures and articles about diverse aspects of Nigerian national life and unified by the single minded commitment to “the liberation of the Nigeria from western imperialist domination at the national and continental levels”. The book was my most constant companion throughout my service year and for long after. In one of the chapters, Dr. Usman admonished his readers: “Be theoretical! Be Coherent! Be Committed! The point I want to make is that when you go to work and in your life, never be afraid or ashamed of coherently analysing any problem and taking it down to its fundamentals and proposing solutions which relate to this. Do not be afraid or ashamed of being theoretical, as long as you are coherent and guided by patriotic commitment. You will make mistakes but you can learn if you are genuinely committed”.

    Over three decades after the publication of this book, I am amazed at the continuing relevance of Dr. Usman’s ideas and critiques to the problems that continue to plague contemporary Nigeria. He was indeed a man who saw tomorrow. For instance, it is now fashionable for oil producing states and communities to fight for so-called resource control even to the extent of blackmailing the rest of the country without, for the most part, demonstrating any necessarily more judicious or honest use of the vast resources accruing to them. Yet, as far back as 1971, in a characteristically trenchant review of L.H. Schatzl’s book, ‘Petroleum in Nigeria’ thoroughly exposes the maldevelopment of the country’s petroleum sector and the conscienceless exploitation of the country by the oil multinationals in connivance with fraudulent Nigerian public officials. In the words of Bala Usman, “This sensational information about how we have been cheated of millions of pounds is not as significant as what Schatzl reveals about the role, or more accurately lack of role, of the petroleum industry in the Nigerian economy. Put against the great potentialities of the oil industry as a generator of both industrial and agricultural growth in the whole of our country, what we have gained so far from the industry is paltry. The government in the seven years 1958 to 1966 received a sum of 68.7 million pounds, cash, since that time this sum might now total up to 150 million pounds. A few Nigerians (actually about 5,000) have got jobs, mostly semi-skilled and unskilled. A few contractors have made a fortune. But the price of petroleum products from petrol and kerosene to fertiliser, drugs and nylon have gone up. The crude oil is sucked out of our sub-soli, piped straight to the tankers and taken to Britain and Western Europe to feed their expanding refineries and petrochemical works and fuel their industries”. Yet, Dr. Usman wrote these words in 1970! How much have things really changed?

    Even as far back then, Dr. Usman had condemned in clear terms the criminal flaring of the country’s natural gas resources by the oil multinationals. According to him, “But the 257 million barrels of crude oil drained out of Nigeria in the years1958-1965 has at least given the government the paltry cash sum of 68.7 million pounds. But the billions, literally billions of cubic feet of natural gas which has come out of some of the drilling sites has simply been burnt off; ‘flared’ in the language of the oil combines; or in plain language, wasted, irrevocably lost to our country. The E.C.N. and a few factories around Port Harcourt use less than 5 per cent of this gas. The rest is burnt off despite its high quality as a fuel (it has90 per cent methane content higher than even North African natural gas”. Decades after these home truths were uttered, how much has really changed in the management of the Nigerian oil industry?

    Dr. Bala Usman along with Dr. Segun Osoba wrote a minority report of the draft constitution, which was eventually jettisoned for the majority report that formed the constitutional basis for the presidential constitution of the second republic. It is now obvious that the authors of the minority draft were far more prescient as the constitutional basis of the second republic was fundamentally flawed and the problems of corruption, instability and irresponsibility that ruined that dispensation far worse than the woes of the first republic. Commenting on the confidence reposed by the Constituent Assembly on a powerful executive presidency as a panacea to national unity and cohesion, Dr. Usman with characteristic perspicacity declared “The justification they give for making the office of president so powerful is that her will provide effective government and become a focus of national loyalty. But it is not clear how this effectiveness and loyalty will develop if there are no provisions to ensure that the president will be elected and operate during his term as somebody who, with his team, stands for a definite political programme and policies. Unless this is ensured the president will be seen as standing for nothing more than his personality and ultimately his place of origin”. Is a supposedly unifying presidency not today the source divisiveness and instability as Dr. Usman had rightly predicted? In 1987, Dr. Usman published another collection of essays titled ‘The Manipulation of Religion in Nigeria (1977 – 1987). We will next week examine the relevance of his ideas, diagnoses and prescriptions to the current challenges of religious intolerance, fundamentalism and violence particularly in northern Nigeria.