Tag: Ban

  • BAN gives ailing members N14.8m

    BAN gives ailing members N14.8m

    Brothers Across Nigeria (BAN), known for humane services, has given cheques of N4,951,000.00 each to ill three members.

     The beneficiaries are Banjo Olu in Ogun State, Ageh Daniel in Rivers State and Onokpite Ufuoma in Delta State.

    The assistance is part of welfare for members to offset their medical bills and recuperation.

    A few months ago, BAN presented N28.6 million to five families of deceased members.

     BAN also assists members with interest free funds to invest in businesses. Members apply for such loans through BAN Empowerment Commission. It is also collateral free.  

    Read Also: PDP will not exceed four years in Osun, says APC council chair

    These deeds are not limited to members, it reaches the larger society and host communities of its chapters worldwide.

    BAN is reputed for giving to the society through Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Nigeria and internationally.

    The organisation has been in existence since 1972 as a university organisation and has grown into an international organisation operating in over 50 countries.

  • Experts seek ban on computer hardware importation

    Experts seek ban on computer hardware importation

    The government of President Bola Tinubu should toe the path of the Indian government which recently imposed restrictions on import of laptops, tablets, all-in-one personal computers and ultra-small computers and servers with immediate effect.

    This is in the spirit of product nationalism, whereby countries promote patronage of home-made products and services to boost local productivity, create more jobs, encourage proficiency, and discourage capital flight.

    Read Also: Ousted president pleads for help

    In addition, this would help build faith in Nigeria which is President Tinubu’s new sermon.

    Some Nigerian technocrats and ICT professionals have recommended the India’s policy for the government, arguing that a ban on importation of computers and allied hardware is what is needed to give a boost to the indigenous companies producing the same products in-country, some of which are struggling.

     A Fellow of Nigeria Computer Society (NCS) and former President, Institute of Software Practitioners of Nigeria (ISPON), Mr. Chris Uwaje, said President Tinubu should adopt the Indian policy as well as make it mandatory that foreign computer manufacturers set up local production facilities in Nigeria in partnership with indigenous computer companies.

    To further encourage such partnership, he recommends that such new manufacturers should be given pioneer status incentives of a minimum of five to seven years.

    Another ICT expert, Mr. Dotun Ali-Balogun urged President Tinubu to mandate that all government ICT operations are run on the technical strength of locally assembled computers.

    His thought was corroborated by two other digital geeks, Messrs Michael Ikeogwu and Ayodele Ogundele who posited that now is the best time for the Federal Government to adopt Buy-Nigeria policy in ICT as a way of discouraging capital flight and encouraging local productivity.

    The new India policy is exactly what the Tinubu government should do, says Ali-Balogun.

    “The Federal Government should adopt a policy that bans importation of computer hardware especially those that are already being assembled in Nigeria. This will not only help boost local production, it will encourage efficiency in local production, create jobs, direct and indirect, through the entire value chain, including marketers, support services and logistics,” he said.

    Nigeria has a couple of indigenous computer hardware assembling companies, with some of them having technically proven products in terms of standards. Available data lists local computer and allied products makers to include RLG, Beta, Data House Technologies, Zinox, Acti-Tech Limited, among others.  While it can be argued that most of them are struggling and may lack capacity to meet local demand, the same cannot be said of Zinox which has since its roll out in 2001 as Nigeria’s first truly globally-certified computer brand gone ahead to execute mega ICT projects.

    Zinox has over the years shown capacity both in Nigeria and offshore, delivering technically-demanding mega projects all globally acknowledged as excellent. In 2006 and 2011, Zinox executed two of the most time-critical ICT mega projects ever to be undertaken in Africa with the introduction of the card reader technology and the Direct Data Capture (DDC) machines respectively on behalf of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). It replicated the same by delivering light-years-ahead technology for the National Population Commission (NPC) for the soon-to-be-organised first digital census in Nigeria.

    It has also executed major projects offshore in Guinea Bissau, The Gambia and the Arab nations through partnerships.

    It will be recalled that under President Olusegun Obasanjo, a directive to Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) was enforced and many MDAs including the Central Bank of Nigeria, Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), INEC, Federal Inland Revenue Services (FIRS), among other parastatals and tertiary institutions had their operations standardized with Zinox computers. It was also the standard systems for Shell, Chevron and other private equities, including multinationals.

    Again, under Obasanjo as President, Zinox powered the 8th All Africa Games codenamed COJA 2003 hosted in Nigeria; the 18th Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) hosted by Obasanjo in Abuja between December 5 and December 8, 2003, and many more. The Obasanjo directive paid off as many indigenous computer assembling companies ramped up production, improved the technical efficiency of their products and created more jobs with concomitant creation of economies of scale.

    Statistics from the International Trade Centre showed that $1.09 billion was spent on software acquisition and importation of computer services into Nigeria in five years from 2016 to 2020.

    The breakdown showed that software and computer services worth $123.89m were imported in 2016, the figure jumped to $216.57million in 2017, $257.55million in 2018 and dipped to $159.28million in 2019, before rocketing to $336.43million in 2020.

    In recent years, indigenous ICT companies have demonstrated capacity in both software and hardware engineering such that multinationals like Microsoft, Oracle, Google, IBM are beginning to show more interest in recruiting young Nigerians.

  • Ban imported tomato paste, don tells govt

    A Professor of Horticulture and Landscape Management, Goke Bodunde, has called on the government to ban imported tomato paste and other agricultural produce that do not meet set standards.

    Delivering the 59th Inaugural Lecture of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (FUNAAB)  titled: “Unveiling the beauty of an unforbidden fruit”, Bodunde said some imported paste contain up to 50 per cent starch before dilution in Nigeria where an additional 15  per cent starch is often added.

    With yearly demand for tomato standing at 2.45 million metric tons (MT) per year compared to the 1.8 million MT produced, Bodunde said a scramble to satisfy the market had led to unethical abuses detrimental to human health.

    “This is the story of some of the tomato paste and puree imported into Nigeria, 91.1 per cent of which according to NAFDAC (2015), failed to meet the required standard,” he said.

    “It is noteworthy that most of the pastes are imported as concentrates in drums and big cans from Italy, India and China. They are usually diluted, packaged and finally canned by various canning industries in Nigeria”.

    The don attributed the country’s poor yield of the fruit to the importation of substandard tomato paste and consumption of rotten tomato fruits called esha in tomato markets of Southwest.

    He said Nigeria had the poorest yield performance of tomato in the world with about four to five tonnes per hectare (t/ha), compared to Egypt’s 39.7t/ha and South Africa with 78.7t/ha.

    Bodunde also said environmental and management factor was responsible for the country’s low yield which is two per cent of the total world’s total despite being widely cultivated.

    On the way forward, the don recommended that the university, which is endowed with huge human and material potential, could promote interest in research along the tomato value chain.

    He suggested that universities and research institutes should encourage researchers’ adoption of crop commodities for crop-based research to reap the benefit of comparative advantage of in-depth knowledge of individual crops.

    Bodunde strongly advocated for investment in tomato canning industry by the public and private sector, as well as the promotion of research-industry linkage and funding for research by the three tiers of government.

  • CPC enforces ban on shisha, tobacco, others

    The Consumer Protection Council has begun an awareness campaign on the National Tobacco Control Act (NTCA) across major cities in Nigeria where cigarettes and shisha are openly sold. The agency’s officials, accompanied by police officers – visited the popular old Ojota motor park in Lagos and nearby garages, as well as some lounges and bars, to enforce the prohibition of shisha.

    Earlier, the agency had conducted the same exercise in Abuja and Port Harcourt accompanied by officers of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC). The Head, Surveillance and Enforcement Department, Federal Competition and Consumers Protection Commission (FCCPC), Lagos Office, Anyanwu Carmellus, pointed out that the council is mandated by law to enforce all enactments aimed at protecting consumers, like the NTCA, and mindful that tobacco products pose grave health risks to consumers, the agency resolved to enforce all the enforceable provisions of the Act.

    “However, we also considered it necessary to sensitise tobacco dealers and the public to the provisions of the law before we commence full enforcement,” he added.The National Tobacco Control Act (NTCA) 2015 regulates and controls the production, manufacture, sale, advertising, promotion and sponsorship of tobacco products in the country.

    The regulations according to him, included the prohibition of the sale of tobacco products to and by anyone below 18 years; ban of sale of cigarettes in single sticks, cigarettes must be sold in packs of 20 sticks only; smokeless tobacco shall be sold in a minimum of a pack of 30 grammes; ban of sale or offer for sale or distribution of tobacco or tobacco products through mail, internet, or other online devices.

    ‘The rest were the prohibition of interference of the tobacco industry in public health and related issues; prohibition of smoking in public places; prosecution of the manager of a public place who permits smoking; prohibition of tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship; and tobacco products’ compliance with the specified standard for content as set out by the Standards Organisation of Nigeria’.

     

  • Group claims credit for ban of Falz’s song

    An Islamic group; the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), says it is behind the ban of ‘This Is Nigeria’, a popular song by Folarin Falana, aka Falz the Bahd Guy.

    The National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) on August 6, August 2018, announced its ban of the song in a letter signed by its Zonal Director, Igomu Onoja.

    According to NBC, a part of the song – “This is Nigeria; look how we living now everybody be criminal” has been tagged “vulgar” and the song is now declared “unfit for radio.”

    MURIC, which had had a long battle with the musician since the song was released is happy with NBC’s verdict, claiming the NBC had reacting based on petition it wrote to the agency.

    The Muslim group had long given Falz a deadline to remove the video of ‘This is Nigeria’ from the airwaves, a warning which the singer had rebuffed.

    They claimed that some scenes in the video are “offensive” as they tend to ridicule their religion.

    Falz on the other hand felt their allegation was baseless as the girls in hijab dancing ‘Shaku Shaku’ in the video represents how entertainment is a distraction from everything that is happening in the society.

    Claiming responsibility for the eventual ban, the group in a statement by its director Ishaq Akintola, said: “We asked Falz to withdraw the video or we would sue him. Instead of showing remorse he dared us. We knew he could delay the court case for years because he is a lawyer and he would use every trick in the books to frustrate us. That was why he was boasting.

    “Therefore, instead of going to court, we decided to ambush him by sending a petition to the video board. This week, the NBC banned the video and others like it.

    “He should be the one to go to court now if he likes. Let him go and show how brilliant he is in court.

    “He and his fans laughed at us when we complained about his provocative and vulgar video. But there is no doubt that he who laughs last laughs best. It is hoped that Nigerian artistes will borrow a leaf from this episode.”

    The group used Fela Kuti’s activism as a point of reference, saying “Fela Anikulapo Kuti used his songs to fight military dictatorship and other ills in the Nigerian society, but he never attacked Muslims or Christians.

    “Neither did he incite Nigerians against any ethnic group. He criticised religious groups but never in a vulgar manner and he never exposed Muslims or Christians to ridicule.”

  • Ban on scavengers in the FCT

    Sir: The recent ban on scavengers popularly known as Baban Bolas in the FCT once again brings to the fore the dictum that every malfeasance has an end date. For scavengers in the FCT, the end game has simply come to their unwholesome activities because the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) has proscribed illegal refuse collection from residential and other areas, limiting the group to only the approved dump sites in both the city and the Area Councils.

    Much as there have been mixed feelings over this recent development, it is pertinent to point out that scavenging the world over has grown past going from house to house to scatter people’s bins. It is done only at dump sites and there is nothing wrong in the FCT deciding to also follow suit. Abuja residents are witnesses to how the activities of these scavengers are posing a threat and making life difficult for the residents. Under the guise of scavenging from refuse bins in neighbourhoods across the city, the Baban Bolas have been involved in many criminal activities from petty stealing to armed robbery, vandalism of public utilities and other forms of crime and criminality.

    Kudos must therefore be given to the FCTA for responding to the outcries of many FCT residents and imposing this ban because many valuables have been lost to scavengers in the territory, as well as vandalism of public utilities and robbery activities that carried their footprints.

    Those against this ban need to understand that government is not trying to stop the business of scavengers but merely moving to bring sanity and orderliness to the business. It is also to the benefit of the scavengers themselves because going to the approved dumpsites will save them time and reduce the laborious task of moving from place to place and sometimes getting knocked down by moving vehicles.

    Government needs to put policies in place to allay the fears expressed by this group about the ripple effect the decision will have on their members such as loss of jobs and shortage of supply of scrap metals to iron smelting companies both at home and abroad. Government should also endeavour to always carry them along in any new development as regards the practice of their trade.

     

    • Danladi Akilu,

    Durumi II, Gudu District, Abuja

  • Rivers to ban street trading

    Some traders at Diobu in Port Harcourt, yesterday, appealed to the Rivers government to provide affordable stalls before enforcing its ban on street trading.

    They spoke to News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) following the seven-day ultimatum banning trading on Bishop Okoye Street in Diobu.

    According to them, it’s unfair for government to drive them out of business without providing an alternative place.

    A trader, Mrs Kechi Wechie, who sells vegetables, appealed to the government not to be hasty about banning trading on Bishop Okoye Street.

    “We are aware that we trade on the road; but we have nowhere to go from here, we implore the government to help us.

    “What we do here is petty trading, we will be happy to access affordable stalls with the assistance of government,’’ Wechie said.

    Another trader, Miss Anita Welekwe, a plantain seller, told NAN that banning trading on the street without another provision would “put food off the tables of many families’’.

    “Many of us trading here are the bread winners in different ways.

    “ I tell you that many families will go hungry if we are stopped from doing our businesses,’’ Welekwe said.

    Archibong Matthew, a grinding machine operator, expressed concern about the notice government has given traders to quit the street.

    “It is from proceeds of my activities here that I assist my younger ones in school; I pray this notice will not be enforced.

    “I will be the greatest victim, I wonder the excuse to give to those that depend on me, I beg the government to change its mind,’’ he said.

    NAN reports that some residents of Mile 3, Diobu, had appealed to the government to stop traders from selling on Bishop Okoye Street.

    They alleged that the traders were display fish, vegetables and other edibles in the open on the filthy street.

    They alleged that they had stopped buying from the  traders, for fear of being infected by disease from such items.

  • Cautious optimism over proposed ban on palm oil import

    Cautious optimism over proposed ban on palm oil import

    Prompted by the need to boost local production and halt the huge import bill for palm oil, valued  at N116.3 billion in 2017, the National Assembly has renewed the push to ban the importation of palm oil and its allied products. It is envisaged that this will conserve foreign exchange, create jobs and boost the economic diversification push. However, with palm oil refineries operating at 30 per cent installed capacity, there are fears that without first addressing the product’s demand/supply gap, the proposed ban will amount to putting the cart before the horse, Assistant Editor CHIKODI OKEREOCHA reports.

    The Senate, has renewed the call to ban the importation of palm oil and its allied products. It came at an auspicious time, which was, perhaps, why it enjoyed an overwhelming support of members of the Upper Chamber of the National Assembly and, indeed, operators and stakeholders in the palm oil value chain.

    Although the fresh push to ban the importation of the product came at a time the Federal Government’s diversification agenda, anchored on increased agricultural production and export, was gathering momentum, the move has come under scrutiny by some experts and critical stakeholders.

    Some of them, who spoke with The Nation, described the proposed ban as a welcome development. They were, however, quick to point out that at the 30 per cent installed capacity of the crude palm oil refineries, banning the importation of the product without first addressing its demand/supply gap would be tantamount to putting the cart before the horse

    For instance, the General Manager, External Affairs, PZ Cussons Nigeria Plc, Mr. Muhammed Tahir, said he supports the move to ban the importation of palm oil into the country as this would boost local production. He, however, told The Nation that at present, the crude palm oil refineries operate at about 30 per cent installed capacity.

    The implication of this, he said, was that there was the need to ramp up local production by addressing the issues around the supply of crude palm oil to the refineries. According to him, at 30 per cent installed capacity, the refineries cannot meet demand by individual and industrial users. To him, addressing the demand and supply gap for palm oil is important before banning its import.

    The upper chamber of the National Assembly, recently started fresh move to ban the import of palm oil and its allied products. Waxing patriotic, Senator Francis Alimikhena of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Edo State, said the importation of the product was a threat to the government’s campaign on diversification.

    The lawmaker, who sponsored the motion, titled: “Urgent need to halt the importation of palm oil and its allied products to protect palm oil industry in Nigeria” and also led the debate, recalled with nostalgia that Nigeria, before the 1970s, was a global powerhouse in palm oil production and export.

    Alimikhena, however, lamented that the country lost her leadership position in the global palm oil trade, forcing her to import about 450, 000 tons of palm oil to the tune of N116.3 billion in 2017 alone. He, therefore, insisted that the government must reverse this trend.

    The lawmaker was right. Nigeria was the world leading producer of palm oil in the 1950s and mid-1960s. She was reportedly supplying about 645,000 Metric Tons (MT) of palm oil yearly to markets across the world and boasting an enviable global market share of about 43 per cent.

    Palm oil alone accounted for 80 per cent of Nigeria’s export earnings. It also created millions of direct and indirect employment opportunities for Nigerians. Malaysia, one of the Asian emerging markets, was even said to have obtained the oil palm seedling with which she built her thriving oil palm business from Nigeria.

    Although the Asian Tiger has since refuted this claim, it, nonetheless, underscored Nigeria’s towering status and visibility in the global palm oil industry. Curiously, from controlling over 40 per cent market share, Nigeria has since lost her grip on the business. She  accounts for a paltry seven per cent of total output.

    Malaysia and Indonesia have since surpassed Nigeria as world’s leading palm oil producers and exporters, retaining the second and first position, respectively. Sadly, Nigeria, as at 2016, fell to an unenviable fifth position.

    While Indonesia produces 32 million tons of palm oil, Malaysia boasts 17.7 million tons. And they have been exporting palm oil products to Nigeria. The country, which was once the bride of the international palm oil business, is now a net importer of palm oil to meet her growing domestic demand.

    Africa’s largest economy has between 450, 000 and 500, 000 tons annual palm oil supply shortage, made up of about 300, 000 tons of Technical Palm Oil (TPO) for the production of soap and about 200, 000 tons of Special Palm Oil (SPO) used in the food industry.

    The fact that much of these are  being met through imports, with the attendant humongous loss to Nigeria in foreign exchange is something Alimikhena and, indeed, other concerned stakeholders cannot comprehend hence the current wave of campaign to reverse the trend.

     

    Private operators support ban

    This time, the public sector (Senate) is in the vanguard of the renewed push to return Nigeria to its glory in palm oil production and export. However, the imperative of repositioning the sector to contribute to diversification is not lost on the private sector, which includes farmers, refinery operators and companies that utilise palm oil as raw material for production.

    To them, the proposed ban bode well with the private sector’s age-long agitation to embrace the Backward Integration Policy (BIP) to encourage local production and ultimately, create jobs and conserve foreign exchange. This was why, for instance, the Plantation Owners Forum of Nigeria (POFN) has thrown its weight behind the move.

    The Forum through its Executive Secretary, Mr. Fatai Afolabi, said the Senate’s move deserved the commendation and support of all Nigerians. According to him, the importation of palm oil and allied palm products were threats to Federal Government’s campaign on diversification of the economy through increased agricultural production and exports.

    Afolabi was particularly peeved that Nigeria, which once held sway in palm oil production and export, imported about 450,000 tons of the product valued at N116.3 billion last year. He, therefore, urged the Federal Government to halt the importation in order to boost local production.

    As far as POFN and indeed, other private sector operators are concerned, Nigeria has no reason spending scarce resources importing the product when Mother Nature has strategically positioned her to call the shot in global palm oil production and export.

    For one, Nigeria and indeed, most parts of Africa, especially West Africa, lie in the world’s oil palm belt – a region which produces the best results for oil palm plantations. Also, she was, and is still, endowed with enormous human resources and fertile arable land to support large scale cultivation of palm oil.

    According to experts, Nigeria’s all-year-round hot weather, a lot of sunshine, abundant rain, rich, deep, flat and permeable soil, among others, are some of the features that make Nigeria most suitable for cultivation of oil palm plantations.

    While hot temperatures allow the oil palm to grow many leaves and, as a result, produce more fruit, oil palms need a lot of sunshine to grow well. It also needs access to water and mineral salts deep in the soil to do well hence the need for a permeable soil like Nigeria’s.

    But, sadly, the country has evidently failed to translate these huge advantages into maintaining a strong position in palm oil production and export.

     

    Where Nigeria got it wrong

    According to experts, Nigeria put the wrong foot forward and lost its economic bearing when she turned her back on agriculture following the discovery of crude oil in commercial quantity in the 70s. Before independence, agriculture was Nigeria’s economic mainstay, with more than 70 per cent of the population engaged in the sector.

    Alimikhena observed, for instance, that apart from various food crops produced in the country, Nigeria was a major producer of palm oil/kernel, cocoa, groundnut and rubber. But following the discovery of crude oil in commercial quantity, agriculture was neglected, while attention was shifted to oil.

    While acknowledging that Nigeria is endowed with the land and manpower to boost palm oil production, the lawmaker noted that the focus should be directed towards returning to pre-independence status in palm oil production. “We have no business importing palm kernel or any oil palm product from any country,” he pointed out.

    Alimikhena said the focus should be directed towards returning Nigeria to pre-independence status in palm oil production, noting that importation was hurting the local palm industry and depleting the nation’s foreign reserve.

    He also said it was threatening the industry’s viability into which many Nigerians have sunk huge sums of money in support of government’s export promotion drive. He expressed hope that if the palm oil industry is fully developed, it will guarantee mass employment and boost the nation’s foreign exchange earnings.

    Some of his colleagues in the Senate could not agree less, with Senator Theodore Orji (Abia-PDP), saying, for instance, that there was need to establish a special fund to encourage local production of palm oil.

    Orji expressed concern that many oil production plants were moribund. While pointing out that palm oil used to be a major income ear      ner for the country, he said unfortunately many plants are dead.

    For Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu, the importance of reviving the palm oil industry cannot be over-emphasised. He, therefore, said there was need to properly position the sector to play its role as one of the major income earners for the country. He added that reviving the sector will boost employment.

    However, those  critical of the fresh move to ban the importation doubt if the Federal Government has the political will to do so let alone follow up with the introduction of policies targeted at encouraging local production.

  • Why we recalled five rusticated students, UNIBEN VC

    Why we recalled five rusticated students, UNIBEN VC

    -denies ban on campus fellowship

    Vice Chancellor of the University of Benin, Professor Faraday Orumwense, yesterday explained why the institution recalled five students who were rusticated for protesting against increment of various fees.

    Prof. Orumwense said the students were not rusticated for protesting but for attempting to disrupt the University’s 47th Founder’s Day and 43rd Convocation ceremonies.

    Orumwense who denied banning campus fellowship said the five students were recalled after intervention from various groups and well-meaning individuals.

    The five students who were members of the institution’s Student Union Government are President of UNIBEN SUG, Osamudiamen Ogbidi, Justus Aidenagnon, Innocent Momodu, Goodnews Ehiabhi and Benjamin Majekodumi.

    Three of them were rusticated for one academic session while two of them were rusticated for two academic sessions.

    They were also barred from holding any office in the campus or participating in student union activities.

    Prof. Orumwense noted that the protest by the students on November 23 was uncalled for and designed to serve the illegitimate purpose of portraying the institution in bad light as well as disrupting the academic calendar.

    He insisted that the Chancellor of the institution, HRH Muhammad Sanusi II, the Sarkin Kano, was not involved in the determining of new charges but the responsibility of the institution’s Governing Council.

    The UNIBEN VC said the new charges were meant for new students and not old students, adding that the protesters pelted the convoy of Sanusi with sachet water.

    Read ALSO: NANS protests rustication of five students from UNIBEN

    According to him, “On November 23rd, the students demonstrated during the last convocation and that led to the closure of the university for some weeks. After Senate waded into the matter, committees were set up to find out the remote and immediate causes of their protest. Some were exonerated and others were rusticated for one or two years.

    “The students charges that were increased were meant for the new students and when the students complained to the Dean of Students. The Dean allowed the council to look into their complaints before they went on protest.

    “Several groups waded in that we should pardon them. So many groups pleaded for their return. We saw them as our children and having looked at pleas from various groups, we took a keen look at the punishment meted on them and they have been called back to return to their studies.

    “We have met some of their requests, we have reduced the hostel charges and others. They are our children. We have told them to go and sin no more.

    “There is no ban on Christian fellowship in UNIBEN. It is not true.”

  • Nigeria likely to ban flavoured cigarettes

    Nigeria likely to ban flavoured cigarettes

    Nigeria is set to ban the sale of flavoured cigarettes.

    This follows the conclusion of the review of the Nigeria Industrial Standard (NIS) 463:2014 for Tobacco and Tobacco Products – Specifications for Cigarette in Abuja by the technical committee on Tobacco and Tobacco products.

    A key resolution of the committee according to a source is that characterising flavours, strawberry, banana, apple and menthol amongst others shall not be used in the manufacture of cigarettes in Nigeria. This will also apply to imported cigarettes after the reviewed standard is approved.

    Other countries where flavour in cigarette and other tobacco products have been prohibited include Brazil, Canada, Ethiopia and Uganda while menthol cigarettes will be banned in the European Union, Turkey and Moldovia from May 2020.

    However, Head of public Relations at the Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON) Mr. Bola Fashina said the technical committee resolutions were still mere proposals, subject to approval by the Standards Council.

    In the UK, there’s a four-year phase-out from 2017 before a final ban on menthol cigarettes in May 2020. There is evidence that menthol relax the airways and the flavour masks the harshness of the smoke, therefore making younger people to find it easier to smoke.

    The FDA had since 2009 banned flavoured cigarette in the USA, including candy, spice, herb, cola, fruit and coffee flavours. CThe law in the USA defines a cigarette as any rolled tobacco product- regardless of the wrapper – “likely to be offered for purchase too consumers as a cigarette.

    Brazil’s National Health Protection Agency (ANVISA) announced the ban on use of additives in cigarettes and other tobacco products on 13 March 2012. The Board of ANVISA declared that additives, including flavourings such as mint, chocolate, cinnamon and fruit mask the bad taste of tobacco, reduce coughing, facilitate drag, and help develop dependence. It believes that additives act as a means of luring young people into starting and maintaining use of tobacco products.