Tag: Benjamin Netanyahu

  • Netanyahu’s missteps hand Palestine diplomatic victory

    Netanyahu’s missteps hand Palestine diplomatic victory

    Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing an unprecedented barrage of criticism from analysts and former officials who accuse him of isolating the country internationally and paving the way for global recognition of Palestinian statehood. Some argue his refusal to end the Gaza war has effectively “created a Palestinian state through mistakes.”

    The backlash intensified after Britain, Canada, Australia and Portugal formally recognized Palestine, bringing the tally of UN member states taking that step to 153.

    More European governments, including France, Luxembourg, Malta and Belgium, are expected to follow the trend widely described in Israel as a “political tsunami.”

    Netanyahu has dismissed the recognition, insisting “a Palestinian state will never be established,” while Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich urged the immediate annexation of the occupied West Bank. But many Israelis now say such rhetoric has left the country dangerously isolated.

    Read Also: Shettima showcases Nigeria’s $200b energy transition potential at UNGA 80

    Nir Kivens, a commentator for the Hebrew outlet Walla, argued that Netanyahu’s government squandered Israel’s standing since October 2023.

    “Recognition is a prize for Hamas, but it was Netanyahu’s government that created the prize committee,” he wrote, adding that Israel’s position is now “worse than that of Hamas itself.”

    He warned that annexing the West Bank would mark “the end of Israel as a Jewish democratic state and the start of an apartheid state,” predicting that eventually even Washington could align with European leaders now backing Palestinian statehood.

    Limor Livnat, a former communications minister from Netanyahu’s own Likud Party, wrote in Yedioth Ahronoth that the prime minister “made every mistake possible,” above all rejecting calls to end the war and secure the release of Israeli captives.

    “On Oct. 7 the world was with us,” she said. “But the longer the war dragged on, Hamas rose from the rubble and ran a successful propaganda campaign against us.” She accused Netanyahu of prolonging the conflict “to preserve his rule,” leaving Israel shunned “in politics, culture and sport.”

    Livnat added that images of devastation in Gaza had reshaped global perception.

    “No one asks who started it anymore. We are seen as tormenting hungry women and children.”

    Political analyst Moria Asraf of Israel’s Channel 13 said the latest recognitions underscored “a weakening of Israel’s ties with Western allies and a deepening isolation.”

    She noted Netanyahu will address the UN General Assembly this week and then meet US President Donald Trump, where possible responses, including annexation or closing foreign consulates, are expected to be discussed.

    “Instead of long-term strategy, the government falls back on talk of annexation, pouring fuel on the fire,” she said.

    Even Netanyahu conceded this month that Israel is sliding into “a kind of isolation,” telling Army Radio the country must prepare for “an economy that is self-sufficient.”

    Since Oct. 7, 2023, Israel has been carrying out a genocide in Gaza, killing more than 65,300 Palestinians, most of them women and children.

    The onslaught has displaced hundreds of thousands alongside a blockade on humanitarian aid that has led to famine and claimed the lives of at least 442 Palestinians, including 147 children.

    Those efforts include a new road map for eventual Palestinian statehood in territories Israel seized in the 1967 Mideast war, and moves by several Western countries to join a global majority in recognizing such a state before it has been established.

    Britain, Canada and Australia formally recognised a Palestinian state on Sunday, joining nearly 150 countries that have already done so, and France is expected to follow suit at this week’s General Assembly.

    But the efforts to push a two-state solution face major obstacles, beginning with vehement opposition from the United States and Israel. The U.S. has blocked Palestinian officials from even attending the General Assembly. And Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is opposed to Palestinian statehood, has threatened to take unilateral action in response – possibly including the annexation of parts of the West Bank.

  • U.S., allies differ as more countries recognise Palestine

    U.S., allies differ as more countries recognise Palestine

    • UK, Germany warn Israel against West
    • Bank annexation

    After Britain, Australia, Canada and Portugal recognised Palestinian statehood Sunday, the gulf between United States and traditional allies became wider yesterday on the issue as world leaders converge on New York for the annual United Nations General Assembly.

    United States called the recognition of a Palestinian state by key allies “performative.”

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also rejected the recognitions as well as the idea of Palestinian statehood, and vowed to respond.

    Six more countries — France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Malta, San Marino and Andorra —announced their recognition of Palestinian statehood at a French- and Saudi-hosted United Nations summit on the two-state solution.

    Read Also: Akpoti-Uduaghan: NLC, Afenifere fault Senate stand on Natasha’s resumption

    The summit co-host, French President Emmanuel Macron, at the beginning of the planned three-hour session at the United Nations, said: “We must do everything within our power to preserve the very possibility of a two-state solution, Israel and Palestine living side by side in peace and security.”

    But, the U.S. and Israel shunned the meeting.

    However, UK officials yesterday changed a travel advisory map to explicitly include Palestine alongside the West Bank and Gaza.

    The update, changing ‘Occupied Palestinian Territories’ to simply Palestine, was made as the London government announced its recognition of the state.

    The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office map now has Palestine with the West Bank and Gaza below in brackets. Some Israeli government ministers are pushing the Jewish nation to annex part of the West Bank in response to the wave of recognitions, which they say reward the Hamas-led massacre of October 7, 2023, that sparked the war in Gaza.

    At the weekly government meeting on Sunday, Netanyahu said Israel will fight at the UN and other international forums “against the slanderous propaganda aimed at us,” as well as the calls to create a Palestinian state that he said “will endanger our existence and constitute an absurd prize for terrorism”.

    He vowed the international community “will hear from us on this matter in the following days,” a possible reference to internal discussions about annexation of the occupied West Bank. Netanyahu has not said publicly what he intends to do, but in a video statement on Sunday evening he said that Israel’s response would come after he meets US President Donald Trump next week.

    Also yesterday, UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said that the British government has warned Israel not to annex parts of the West Bank in retaliation for Britain and other Western countries’ recognition of Palestinian statehood.

    A spokesperson for the German government, which has held off on recognising a Palestinian state, also said in a statement that there must be no further annexation of Palestinian territories by Israel.

    Israel has controlled West Bank since the Six Day War of June 1967, and its settlements there are considered illegal by most countries except United States.

    Saudi Arabia, with which Israel has sought to normalise relations, has reportedly warned that annexation of the West Bank would have “major implications.” The UAE, with which Israel has relations, has also called annexation a “red line.”

    Speaking to the BBC ahead of the two-state solution summit yesterday, Cooper said she has “been clear” in conversations with her Israeli counterpart Gideon Sa’ar that Britain’s recognition of Palestinian statehood was in Israel’s interest, and that Israel must not respond by annexing parts of the West Bank.

    “I have been clear to the Israeli foreign minister [and] we have been clear to the Israeli government that they must not do that,” said Cooper. “We have been clear that this decision that we are taking is about the best way to respect the security for Israel as well as the security for Palestinians.”

    “It’s about protecting peace and justice and crucially security for the Middle East, and we will continue to work with everyone across the region in order to be able to do that,” she said.

    Cooper added that the UK had a moral obligation to keep the two-state solution alive even as “extremists on all sides” wanted it dead.

  • Israel sends Mossad director to Qatar for Gaza ceasefire talks

    Israel sends Mossad director to Qatar for Gaza ceasefire talks

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is sending the director of the Mossad foreign intelligence agency to ceasefire negotiations in Qatar, his office said Saturday, in a sign of progress in talks on the war in Gaza.

    It was not immediately clear when David Barnea would travel to Qatar’s capital, Doha, for the latest round of indirect talks between Israel and the Hamas militant group, but there is U.S. pressure for a deal before the presidential inauguration on Jan. 20. Barnea’s presence means high-level Israeli officials who would need to sign off on any agreement are now involved.

    Read Also: Climate action planning, implementation must include women, says minister 

    Just one brief ceasefire has been achieved in 15 months of war, and that was in the earliest weeks of fighting. The talks mediated by the United States, Egypt and Qatar have repeatedly stalled since then.

    Under discussion is a phased ceasefire, with Netanyahu signaling he is committed only to the first phase, a partial hostage release in exchange for a weekslong halt in fighting.

    Hamas has insisted on a full Israeli troop withdrawal from the largely devastated territory, but Netanyahu has insisted on destroying Hamas’ ability to fight in Gaza. On Thursday, Gaza’s Health Ministry said over 46,000 Palestinians have been killed in the war, the majority women and children, though it doesn’t say how many were fighters or civilians.

    Also being sent to Qatar are the head of Israel’s Shin Bet internal security agency and military and political advisers. Netanyahu’s office said the decision followed a meeting with his defence minister, security chiefs and negotiators “on behalf of the outgoing and incoming U.S. administrations.”

  • Why Netanyahu is still on top

    Why Netanyahu is still on top

    By Yisrael Medad

    Over 14 months have passed since hordes of Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists brutally invaded Israel’s Western Negev communities, killing 1,200, kidnapping 250, and committing other heinous crimes. It was like a throwback to 627 CE, when the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza surrendered to Muhammed’s forces. In that case, all the men and one woman were beheaded and the rest of the women and children were enslaved, except for a few converts. In Be’eri, Sderot and Nir Oz, no one was even given the choice to convert.

    The October 7 attacks resulted in enormous devastation, both physical and psychological, and monumental surprise. The public reverberations of anger, frustration, and shock at the failures of the military and the government were palpable. Yet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has remained in power.

    US President Joe Biden is out of the political picture. There’s a new prime minister in England, and France’s president is tottering. Bashar Assad has fled Syria. Meanwhile, Israel’s prime minister continues to serve. He does so despite the attacks on October 7, despite the hostages still held in Gaza, and despite the cries from the parliamentary opposition and the anarchists who protest on Kaplan Street.

    How and why has he succeeded?

    A central complaint of the anti-Netanyahu crowd is that he “lacks a strategy and a plan” or that he “lacks a vision.” Those claims have been proven false. Although the Israeli military began its campaign slowly, it is now obvious that there was a plan from the beginning. The generals simply needed someone to force them put into practice a plan they had probably previously rejected as it ran against their mindset that Hamas had been deterred and was an ineffective military force.

    The person who forced the military to adopt that plan was the prime minister. If former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant hadn’t been overly concerned with his own future (hiring his own lawyer to protect him from charges of war crimes), the partnership between the two would have been more successful in the field.

    Moreover, that criticism smacks of sour grapes. At the root of the criticism is that Netanyahu did not adopt the self-destructive strategy that the opposition wanted him to follow. An example of such a self-destructive strategy was Yair Lapid’s government surrendering Israeli territory to Lebanon under the threat of Hezbollah’s Hassan Nasrallah.

    Read Also; TARABA CHURCH CRISIS: Warring parties in fresh battle for control of headquarters

    As for the genuine problem of the Qatari money permitted into Gaza to prop up Hamas, Rafi DeMogge (the pseudonym of a researcher who writes on political demography) had an answer for that in a piece published in Mosaic on October 21. He acknowledged that Netanyahu went along with the popular conception that transfer of Qatari funds to Gaza would protect Israel’s security, but he also said that the prime minister had no real alternative. He noted that even the Bennett-Lapid government did not “make any meaningful change to Netanyahu’s decade-old Gaza policy.”

    To think that the prime minister could have nixed that financial flow prior to October 7 is naive. He would have faced the sloganeering of his opponents that he would be inviting a war. It was, as usual, Hamas that allowed him to finally unleash the Israeli military’s withheld power. The situation in Lebanon illustrates that success is often the result of political leadership overriding the politicization of the army chiefs.

    On the issue of the hostages, Netanyahu has benefited from most of the population realizing that Hamas, not Israel, has been the recalcitrant partner in possible release deals, something even American diplomats have admitted is the case.

    Another aspect that indicates his success is the economic situation.

    This past week, Globes reported record figures for mergers and acquisitions in the Israeli tech industry over the past year. A new report from Vintage Investment Partners indicates that merger and acquisition deals set a new peak of $10.5 billion, 22% higher than the previous peak of $8.6 billion in 2021. Even a cursory reading of business media sites indicates that all the bleak prophecies of Israel’s economy did not come to pass, even if the situation is not perfect.

    True, Israel will need to invest huge amounts in rebuilding the Western Negev and northern Israel, as well as in shoring up small businesses and industry. Nevertheless, the prime minister is still orchestrating a firm and reliable economic balance for the country. Financial suffering in Israel has been limited, and the people realize that.

    Netanyahu has also displayed diplomatic leadership and expertise in presenting the Israeli narrative, two skills that are appreciated by the electorate. It is quite possible that his performance since October 7 assisted Donald Trump’s showing in the election by providing his supporters with an additional reason to vote against the Democratic elite, which is perceived as weak and “woke.”

    Anti-Israel actions on college campuses and in the streets of American cities were seen as threatening to average Americans. When Americans saw the Israeli prime minister’s firm stand and considered his strong friendship with Trump, they were further convinced to lend Trump their support for Israel’s sake. No other Israeli politician could have achieved that.

    That same situation also convinced Netanyahu’s Israeli coalition partners not to rock the boat too much. Moreover, the onslaught of genocide and war crimes charges from the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court shored up his base and provided him with another layer of public support.

    His errors and the various court cases concerning his personal affairs have not outweighed his apparent brilliance in managing the affairs of state. Even the delay in releasing the hostages has not affected his political standing. His appearances both on the international stage and within Israel’s political and security spheres have been successful. And now, with the developing situation in Syria, few would wish him to leave office.

    Netanyahu has proven that Israel has a strong leader in the face of continuing terror, an increasingly anti-Zionist Europe, and the developing security situation. And that is what the people want.

    • This article was first published in www.themedialine.org

  • Trump congratulates Israeli PM Netanyahu after polls

    U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday congratulated Benjamin Netanyahu for his election performance, as it became clear the Israeli prime minister would get another term.

    Trump, who is perceived as a staunch supporter of the Israeli premier, told reporters that a Netanyahu victory would increase the chances for peace between Israelis and Palestinians.

    “I think we have now a better chance with Bibi having won,’’ Trump said before departing the White House.

    Read Also: Trump’s move against Huawei suffers setback

    Netanyahu’s Likud party and its allies are forecast to be the largest bloc in the Israeli parliament, putting him on course for a fifth term in office.

    Trump has moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and recently recognised the Israeli annexation of the occupied Golan Heights.

    He also designated the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps this week as a foreign terrorist organization.

     

  • Trump congratulates Israeli PM Netanyahu after elections

    U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday congratulated Benjamin Netanyahu for his election performance, as it became clear the Israeli prime minister would get another term.

    Trump, who is perceived as a staunch supporter of the Israeli premier, told reporters that a Netanyahu victory would increase the chances for peace between Israelis and Palestinians.

    “I think we have now a better chance with Bibi having won,’’ Trump said before departing the White House.

    Read Also: Trump threatens to shut border with Mexico soon

    Netanyahu’s Likud party and its allies are forecast to be the largest bloc in the Israeli parliament, putting him on course for a fifth term in office.

    Trump has moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and recently recognised the Israeli annexation of the occupied Golan Heights.

    He also designated the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps this week as a foreign terrorist organisation.

  • Brazil moving its embassy to Jerusalem matter of when, not if – Netanyahu

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that Brazil’s President-elect Jair Bolsonaro told him that it was a matter of “when, not if” he moves his country’s embassy in Israel to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv.

    The far-right Bolsonaro, who takes office on Tuesday and is hosting Netanyahu and the leaders of other countries for his inauguration, has said he would like to follow the lead of U.S. President Donald Trump and move the embassy.

    But he has come under intense pressure from Brazil’s powerful agriculture sector not to do so, as it could hurt Brazilian exports to Arab nations.

    Such a move by Bolsonaro would be a sharp shift in Brazilian foreign policy, which has traditionally backed a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    The Arab League had told Bolsonaro that moving the embassy to Jerusalem would be a setback for relations with Arab countries, according to a letter seen by Reuters earlier in December.

    “Bolsonaro told me it was “when, not if” he moves the embassy to Jerusalem,” Netanyahu said on Sunday during a meeting with leaders of Brazil’s Jewish community in Rio de Janeiro.

    “We attach enormous importance to Brazil, and Brazil in the context of Latin America,” he added. “This heralds a historic change.”

    Netanyahu, who met with Bolsonaro on Friday, said that the Brazilian accepted his invitation to visit Israel, a trip that is likely to take place in March.

    Netanyahu is the first Israeli prime minister to visit Brazil.

    After he met the Israeli leader, Bolsonaro said that “we need good allies, good friends, good brothers, like Benjamin Netanyahu.” (Reuters/NAN)

  • Israel bombed Iranian-backed militias in Syria – Netanyahu

    Israel has attacked Iranian-backed Shi’ite Muslim militias in Syria, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday, casting such actions as potentially helping to stem a Syrian Sunni Muslim refugee exodus to Europe.

    Israeli officials have previously disclosed scores of air strikes within Syria to prevent suspected arms transfers to Lebanon’s Shi’ite Hezbollah guerrillas or Iranian military deployments.

    But they have rarely given detail on the operations, or described non-Lebanese militiamen as having been targeted.

    Netanyahu accused Iran, which has been helping Damascus beat back a seven-year-old rebellion, of bringing in 80,000 Shi’ite fighters from countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan to mount attacks against Israel and “convert” Syria’s Sunni majority.

    “That is a recipe for a re-inflammation of another civil war – I should say a theological war, a religious war – and the sparks of that could be millions more that go into Europe and so on.

    Read Also: UN: Netanyahu bows hot as secretary-general makes first regional trip

    “And that would cause endless upheaval and terrorism in many, many countries,” Netanyahu told an international security forum.

    “Obviously we are not going to let them do it. We’ll fight them. By preventing that – and we have bombed the bases of this, these Shi’ite militias – by preventing that, we are also offering, helping the security of your countries, the security of the world.”

    Netanyahu did not elaborate. About half Syria’s pre-war 22 million populations has been displaced by the fighting, with hundreds of thousands of refugees making it to Europe.

    Syria’s population is mostly Sunni Muslim. President Bashar al-Assad is from the Alawite religious minority, often considered an offshoot of Shi’ite Islam.

    Under recent deals between Assad’s government and mainly Sunni rebels, insurgents have left long-besieged areas sometimes in exchange for Shi’ite residents moving from villages surrounded by insurgents.

    The political opposition to Assad says the deals amount to forced demographic change and deliberate displacement of his enemies away from the main cities of western Syria.

    The Damascus government says the deals allow it to take back control and to restore services in the wrecked towns.

    NAN

  • Israel blames Palestinians for cancellation of Argentina friendly

    Israel on Wednesday blamed Palestinian pressure for Argentina’s cancellation of its World Cup  warmup against Israel, a match that had been set for contested Jerusalem.

    The Palestinians accused Israel of using the fixture and the participation of Barcelona ace Lionel Messi to underpin its disputed claim to Jerusalem, which U.S. President Donald Trump recognised in 2017 as Israel’s capital in a break from international consensus.

    The Israeli Embassy in Argentina confirmed the cancellation on Twitter, saying it was saddened by the news following the threats directed at the players.

    The embassy expressed its hope that the players would come to Israel soon.

    “The threats and provocations directed at Lionel Messi, which logically aroused the solidarity of his colleagues and fear of playing the friendly, are no strangers to the daily life of Israel’s civilian population whose sporting stars, to put it simply, have been on numerous occasions the targets of violence and attacks,” the embassy wrote.

    “The friendship between Argentina and Israel, which will soon celebrate its 70th anniversary, is not about a football match. The democratic country and plural state (composed of Jews, Muslims and Christians), will always eagerly await the chance to receive one of the stars of Argentine sport.”

    The match at Jerusalem’s Teddy Kollek Stadium was to be Argentina’s last before they kick off their World Cup campaign in Russia on June 16.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Argentinian President Mauricio Macri on Tuesday night to ask him to persuade the team not to cancel their visit, but a diplomatic official said the chances of salvaging the fixture were very slim as Macri can’t force the players to come to Israel.

    Read Also: Israel Minister threatens to end Assad’s rule

    “Macri has some influence, but it’s their decision and they’re afraid to come in the current climate,” the official added. “Israel is still pressuring them to reverse the decision.”

    In a second conversation Tuesday night, Macri told Netanyahu he had no influence on the matter.

    Culture and Sports Minister Miri Regev received updated from the game’s producer, Danny Ben Naim, on the efforts to reverse the Argentinean decision.

    The minister was informed that since Argentina had announced their arrival for a friendly with Israel, different terror organisation had started sending messages to the players and their family members with explicit threats, as well as images and videos of children’s bodies.

    Addressing claims that the Argentinean team refused to arrive because of the decision to move the game to Jerusalem, the sports minister said: “That’s nonsense which legitimizes terror and the BDS campaign.

    Unfortunately, we have trojan horses in the Knesset who supporting terror.”

    President Reuven Rivlin said in response to the cancellation, “This really is a sad morning for the fans, including some of my grandchildren, but there are values that are even bigger than Messi.

    “I’m very concerned in the politicisation concealed in the Argentinean move. Even in the most difficult times, we made every effort to leave considerations which were not pure sport out of the soccer fields, and it’s a shame the Argentine team failed to do it this time.”

    The visit of twice world champions Argentina has attracted huge interest among Israeli fans, mainly because of Barcelona great Lionel Messi’s planned participation.

    Palestinians celebrated the cancellation.

    In Gaza, people cheered and in Ramallah in the West Bank, the Palestinian Football Association issued a statement thanking Messi and his colleagues for cancelling the game.

    NAN

  • Trump’s gambit Iran: World awaits decision on nuclear deal

    “Insane,” “ridiculous,” “worst deal ever” are some of the descriptions used by US President Donald Trump for the Iran nuclear agreement, which he has bitterly opposed since early in his campaign for the White House.

    The world will soon find out whether Trump’s rants about the 2015 deal will produce a concrete shift in US diplomacy, regarding one of the most important foreign policy issues of his presidency.

    Trump officially has until Saturday to decide whether to reintroduce US sanctions on Iran, which among other things could spell an end to the accord.

    But he has said he will announce his decision at 2.00 p.m. ( 1800 GMT ) on Tuesday.

    In January, Trump renewed waivers for US sanctions on Iran but warned that it was the last time he would do so unless several “disastrous flaws” in the agreement were addressed.

    His ultimatum triggered a 120-day period that ends this weekend.

    There is a growing consensus in the United States that his decision will effectively pull the US out of the deal, and that prospect has been accompanied by a range of speculation over what comes next.

    French President, Emmanuel Macron, said he didn’t know what Trump would decide.

    But after several meetings with the president over a three-day state visit recently he said: “My view is that he will get rid of this deal on his own for domestic reasons’’.

    “The president campaigned on getting out of the deal and I think that he’s going to do so,’’ Lieut.-Gen. William G Boykin said on Thursday on Fox News.

    Iranian leaders already have pledged to abandon the deal if the US withdraws.

    But it could remain in the deal with Britain, France and Germany, along with China and Russia, which have expressed their continued support.

    Meanwhile, UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres, has warned that if Trump withdraws, it could risk war.

    Since Trump issued the ultimatum in January, U.S. and European negotiators have met a number of times to address US concerns within and beyond the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action ( JCPOA ), as the deal is formally known.

    The U.S. side has raised four main issues: Iran’s ballistic missile programme, its involvement in regional conflicts, inspection of Iranian nuclear sites and so-called sunset clauses.

    The sunset clauses, which let some restrictions on Iran’s nuclear programme expire, have proved the most difficult of these.

    The U.S. claims that the clauses provide Iran with a pathway to building nuclear weapons over time.

    Trump has pushed the European partners to search for possible compromises.

    Determined to stay in the deal, the bloc has argued that abandoning it would not help address the ballistic weapons issue or Iran’s role in the region.

    “The JCPOA is a non-proliferation agreement.

    “Other issues of concern are addressed separately,’’ a senior EU official said on condition of anonymity.

    “If the deal falls apart, you would not be in any better position to tackle these issues.’’

    Furthermore, the deal is doing what it is supposed to do, by curbing Iran’s nuclear activities, the official noted.

    If the agreement falls apart and there’s no substitute, he said, it would “probably trigger a nuclear arms race in the region.’’

    The dramatic developments on the Korean Peninsula may also influence Trump’s thinking on the nuclear deal.

    Pulling out of the JCPOA could erode the trust he’s tried to build in the effort to denuclearise the Korean Peninsula, ahead of a planned meeting with the North Korean leader, Kim Jong Un; or it could send a strong message to Pyongyang that Trump is prepared to deliver on his threats.

    Domestic politics could likewise have a role to play, as Trump could be thinking about fulfilling a campaign promise ahead of the November mid-term elections to boost his Republican Party’s chances of maintaining its majority in Congress.

    In recent weeks, Trump has manoeuvred aggressively.

    Read Also: U.S. Ambassador to UN disapproves of Trump’s “communication style”

    He has changed his secretary of state, switching the moderate Rex Tillerson for the more hawkish Mike Pompeo, a fierce critic of the Iran deal.

    He has also brought in John Bolton, a foreign policy hawk, as his national security adviser.

    Pompeo met Israeli President, Benjamin Netanyahu, on his first foreign trip after taking office, stressing that if the Iran nuclear deal cannot be fixed, Trump will withdraw.

    The “full array of threats,’’ including Iran’s missile systems and support for militant groups in Syria, Lebanon and Yemen must be addressed as part of a revised agreement, he said.

    Pompeo also said documents that Netanyahu revealed April 30 show that Iran had a secret nuclear weapons programme for years and lied about it.

    “What this means is the deal was not constructed on a foundation of good faith or transparency,’’ Pompeo said.

    NAN