Tag: bickering

  • Bickering in Bauchi

    SIR: Over the last few weeks, the camps of the Bauchi State governor and that of the Speaker, House of Representatives have had or created reasons to exchange words in the newspapers as to each other’s misgivings about their party, the APC, and governance in the state.

    So far, the camps have allowed the exchange to deteriorate into smear and name-calling campaigns rather than one to be confronted with humility and available facts like the matured groups they ought to be. Furthermore, the local media and polity have been so heated as to call for concern by anyone who wishes Bauchi any good.

    The camp of the Speaker, which was later to be championed by Hon. Ahmed Yerima, has reeled out its grievances as to certain conditions in Bauchi and its state of affairs, which they claim are an indication of poor leadership in the affairs of the state. The governor’s camp has however responded by denying the claims and going further to insinuate any lack of credibility by the claimants.

    In all this, so far, no elder statesman, stakeholder or prominent politician has deemed it fit to lend their voice in the exchange. They should have necessarily waded into the conflict and called both parties to order, at least for the sake of the unity of the party and by extension the interest of the generality of the people of Bauchi State. The party which ordinarily should have come in as a disinterested arbitrator to arrest the drift has already taken sides with the executive. Thus it has lost the   moral authority to intervene and mediate to the satisfaction of both sides.

    In either of these the people of Bauchi State are and will continue to be at the receiving end. They deserve better after the Yuguda phenomenon. Bauchi State and its people should begin to enjoy or at least begin to see some promises of a better future. They have sacrificed and have been patient for the lack of development over the last eight years, and now this.

    Bauchi politicians should know that the people can be tolerant. They have so far been. They can equally sacrifice where they must and also envisage a good ending. Taking them for a ride is what any politician worth his onions cannot afford to do. The state badly needs development in all aspects of the indices. We have been living on the glory of the past. The glory is fast fading unless concrete steps are taken to arrest the decay.

    Politicians should get their acts together. Bauchi State governor, legislators- federal and state, stakeholders at both federal and state levels, must, as a matter of urgency, jettison all forms of bickering and put heads together for the short, medium and long term development of the state.

    As things stand it may not be too late. The people of Bauchi and indeed the nation are watching.

     

    • Abdu AdamuMisau,

    misauabduadamu@gmail.com.

  • Plateau NRA Boss: Internal bickering the bane of Plateau Utd

    Plateau NRA Boss: Internal bickering the bane of Plateau Utd

    Chairman of the Nigeria Football Referee Association, Plateau State branch, Jibrin Bancir has expressed concern at the inability of the state owned club, Plateau United to become the focal point in the Nigeria Professional Football League (NPFL) due to bickering within major stakeholders in the state.

    Bancir stated this at the Rwang Pam Stadium on Thursday evening when he met with the acting General Manager of Plateau United, Pius Hemwan during their final training session before the first league game of the season against Niger Tornadoes slated for today.

    He revealed that if all the major stakeholders had closed ranks and eschewed violence Plateau United would have ranked in the same light with other top clubs in Nigeria.

    Bancir, however, challenged them to put their differences aside and support the state’s darling team so that the good old days when Jos was noted for celebrating greatness and accomplishment.

    Earlier, the acting General Manager of the club, Pius Hemwan had solicited for the support of all critical stakeholders in the game in the state to enable him succeed.

    He urged the state NRA to see his task as a Plateau State project and not hesitate to draw his attention whenever he is going astray so that together they can ensure that the team is counted as a formidable force in the premier league.

    The NRA state boss expressed delight with Hemwan’s visit and assured him of the association’s unalloyed support to ensure a successful campaign in the top-flight and that his doors are wide open at anytime whenever he needs their advice.

    Hemwan also met with the supporters of Plateau United where he pledged to work closely with them while appealing to them to eschew all acts of hooliganism as the team returns to the premier league.

    He informed the supporters club that the LMC has come out with a deliberate policy to reward any team that attracts 5,000 fans or more to the stadium while imploring them to mobilise fans to the stadium.

    Hemwan reminded the supporters club that he is no greenhorn to the new assignment adding that he would repair the team’s old bus to convey them to their away matches as the management’s support for their loyalty to the club all these while.

  • Bickering in Ekiti  community over chieftaincy stool

    Bickering in Ekiti community over chieftaincy stool

    An attempt to fill the vacant throne of the Ogoga of Ikere Ekiti has sparked tension in the second largest town in Ekiti State. While princes and princesses in three ruling houses are opposed to the selection of Adejimi Adu as the Ogoga-elect on one hand, fresh controversy erupted over the actual number of ruling houses in the community. ODUNAYO OGUNMOLA reports.

    Ikere Ekiti, the second largest town in Ekiti State, is currently on the edge on who is the next occupant of the royal seat, the Ogoga throne.

    The last Ogoga of Ikere, Oba Samuel Adegoke Adegboye, joined his ancestors on August 22 last year after reigning for 43 years.

    The town experienced unprecedented development during Adegboye’s reign and grew in infrastructural development and population.

    It is strategically located between two state capitals- Akure in Ondo State and Ado-Ekiti in Ekiti State-and is also popularly referred to as the gateway into Ekiti land.

    The Ogoga throne is one of the most sought-after in Ekiti State because it is a first-class seat that has many privileges.

    The occupant of the throne belongs to the exclusive class of “Pelu-Pelu Obas” who are regarded as the most pre-eminent Obas in Ekiti State and they are 16 in number.

    Ikere is a one-town local government area and the five per cent from the local government allocation goes to the traditional council which is headed by the Ogoga.

    These are some of the perks that make the throne of the Ogoga and other first-class kingship seats attractive.

    As it is normal when a king dies in Yoruba land, there is always bitter struggle among princes of various ruling houses in a bid to occupy the throne.

    Moves to install a successor to Oba Adegboye is turning brothers against brothers and sisters against sisters in Ikere as various interest groups are working hard to ensure that their candidate wins the royal trophy.

    Some kingmakers have selected one of the contestants for the throne, Samuel Adejimi Adu, as the Ogoga-elect, maintaining that his election was in line with the tradition of the community.

    But the selection did not go down well with princes and princess of Ikere who are claiming that Adu did not belong to any of the ruling houses in the town.

    They alleged that the selection of Adu was an attempt to impose him on the community.

    As the crisis rages, allegations of bribery are flying around as some kingmakers are being accused of having their palms greased to favour Adu over other candidates but the concerned kingmakers have denied the allegations.

    Three ruling houses in Ikere Ekiti have called on Governor Ayo Fayose to avert a breakdown of law and order in the community following Adu’s election as the Ogoga-elect.

    The alleged imposition of Adu, whom they claimed is not a member of any of the  three ruling houses eligible to produce the next Ogoga, is already causing tension in the town.

    The Princes and princesses (the Omo Owas) in the three ruling houses of Akayejo, Agabaola and Ogbenuote said the alleged imposition violates the State Chieftaincy Law and the tradition of the town which forbids the enthronement of a non-member of the royal family.

    They called for the annulment of Adu’s selection and commencement of a fresh process of selecting the next Ogoga of Ikere in line with relevant laws of the land, maintaining that the candidate must come from the recognised ruling houses.

    Speaking at a press briefing on Monday attended by all the Omo Owas at the Ogoga Palace, their spokesman, Ebenezer Ojo Ologundoye, claimed that Adu was foisted on the community by members of the Ikere Development Forum (IDF).

    He described the alleged imposition as “illegal, unlawful, unconstitutional and very strange to the Ikere customs and traditions” adding that a faction of kingmakers carried out the selection of Adu.

    Ologundoye revealed that the state government has warned all parties in the kingship crisis to stay action on the selection process but expressed anger that 14 out of 21 kingmakers defied government’s directive and went ahead to select Adu as the Ogoga-elect.

    According to him, the Omo Owas are not happy with the sharp division of the kingmakers into two factions which he said was masterminded by the members of the IDF in their bid to impose their candidate as the monarch of the town.

    The Omo Owas’ spokesman said the flawed selection process may not stand the test of legal scrutiny as the town cannot stand the ignominy of having its Oba removed by the court of law owing to violation of relevant constitutional and traditional laws.

    He said: “To say the least, Mr. Samuel Jimi Adu, is not a member of any of the ruling houses, but surprisingly he is claiming to be a member of Ogbenuote Ruling House, whereas he has no link with that royal family and neither is he a prince at all, which means this selection has no place in history and in law.

    “As a matter of fact, no selection process was conducted by the Ogbenuote Ruling House, some few people just handpicked and foisted on the family some powerful indigenes and this had sparked widespread resentment thereby culminating in some protest letters to the Governor, the State Attorney-General and Speaker of the State House of Assembly, among others.

    “Rather than for the kingmakers to consult the oracle in line with customs and tradition, they came up with a list of 14 kingmakers out of 21 traditional kingmakers.

    “Even two of the kingmakers refused to sign, sensing danger in the high level of partisanship and illegality embarked upon by the kingmakers”

    The families contended that it was alien to tradition of the town for IDF, which was a town development group to dabble into obaship issue, branding such attempt as unconstitutional and brazen display of ego.

    However, 11 out of the 14 kingmakers have unanimously upheld the selection of Adu  as the Ogoga-elect, maintaining that his selection followed due process as stipulated by the extant laws on chieftaincy matters in the state.

    The kingmakers, who flayed media report which claimed that the screening process was fraudulent, insisted that the exercise was carried out through the consultation of the Ifa Oracle and voting in the presence of two representatives of each of the royal houses and a government representative.

    Speaking with reporters on the issue, with the other 10 kingmakers in attendance, the head of the kingmakers, the Sao of Ikere Ekiti, Chief James Omotosho noted that the appointment of an Oba is a sacred matter.

    The High Chief condemned resort to the media by those he referred to as “disgruntled elements” within the town in a bid to win the Ogoga stool, noting that such move was “satanic and aimed at truncating the existing peace in the community for selfish reasons.

    “Fighting a sacred war which one has failed to win through the due ‘process’ by hiring the media is an insult to our tradition and this belittles our revered throne before the whole world.

    “If anyone is boasting of any media affiliation, he should use such connection to recruit our teeming unemployed youths into the media rather than using the media to steal his way into a position God has not given to him”, Omotoso affirmed.

    Omotoso also stated that the claim that the 14 kingmakers which presided over the screening exercise that produced Adu were not the authentic kingmakers was baseless as no one could attain the position of a kingmaker by favour or any form of manipulation.

    He further said: “What do they actually want? The Ifa Oracle was consulted in the presence of everyone. Out of the six contestants shortlisted, his ‘ifa’ was the best.

    “To fulfill all righteousness, we went into voting. He got 11votes while Prince Oyebanji Olajuyin had three, others had no vote. If we are not authentic, how come they subjected themselves to be screened by us?”

    Also, the head of Agirlala-Ogbenuote Ruling House, Chief Abioye Ojo a.k.a Atewologun had bluntly refuted the claim that the Ogoga-elect is not an offspring of the royal family, noting that his father was once a family head of the lineage whose legacies of good leadership and selflessness were immense.

    He frowned at the use of Ogoga palace as a platform for a media campaign by a group of people, a matter which he noted had become an issue of concern and worry among the people.

    Ojo noted that tradition however provided occupying the throne on the interim, before the emergence of a new king to be neutral and not to desecrate the primordial tenets of non-alignment throughout the transition period.

    He said: “Those who are saying those things are rather drunk and beclouded by their thirsts for offices.

    “His father was a family head around 1991.When even he, (the father) died, his children presented to the family a live cow which we all slaughtered and ate to celebrate his father in line with our tradition.

    “If they have a genuine claim, why have they not raised this alarm before his emergence?”

    ln the same manner, the Ologotun of lkere Ekiti , Chief Emmanuel Olajide  under whose directive the Ifa Oracle was consulted according to the  tradition has warned on the need to allow peace to reign in the town and the entire state.

    Olajide said: “The whole exercise took place in my presence. The Secretary to the Local Government, Mr. Wale Olanipekun, the heads and Secretaries of each ruling house were there.

    “Everything was transparent. All these claims are afterthought and not good enough for Ikere and Ekiti State at large. We are tired of crisis in this state. It is our prayer that none of these mischief makers would plunge us into one.”

    Olajide also flayed the bribery allegation leveled against the kingmakers, describing it as spurious and unfounded. He noted that it is the custom to always stigmatise wealthy people in the name of bribery as a result of their economic wherewithal.

    He contended: “Those that claimed that we took bribes should show their proofs. Such accusation is baseless and spurious.

    “If we vote 20 times, we are still going to vote the same man who the Ifa Oracle has chosen. We cannot bend the tradition because of some people’s selfish interests.”

    The kingmakers, who described the state Governor Fayose as a lover of the town, urged the government to announce the result of the screening exercise presented to it in the interest of peace.

    Another dimension has been added to the Ikere kingship crisis as one of the royal households in the community, a branch of the Agirilala Ruling House, has denied the existence of three royal households in the community.

    The Adetoye, Aderiyele and Adeluyi Royal Families of the Agirilala House of Ikere-Ekiti, in a statement made available to newsmen said there were “attempts to misrepresent history and stand fact on its head.”

    They also described the scenario as “an act capable of misleading all descendants of Ogoga and Ikere indigenes at large.”

    In the statement signed by Adedapo Akomolafe for Adetoye family; Moses Jegede for Aderiyele family and Adebayo Afuye for Adeluyi family, the royal families said going by an extant Court of Appeal judgment, “there are only two ruling houses in Ikere.”

    According to them, the old Ondo State Government had, in a White Paper issued in July 1981, approved two ruling houses namely Agirilala and Akaiyejo, adding that “dissatisfied with the government position, the late Chief Samuel Adetifa, the then Akapinsa and a member of Agabaola branch instituted a suit No: HCR/24/82 at Ikere High Court on behalf of Agabaola and Ogbenuote branches.”

    They said the court, presided over by Justice R.O. Fawehinmi, on November 3 , 1988 delivered judgment in favour of the plaintiff “to the effect that there are three ruling houses in Ikere namely Akaiyejo, Agabaola and Ogbenuote.”

    They, however, stated that “government and the late Prince Gabriel Jegede, representing Agirilala Ruling House, appealed against the judgment at the Court of Appeal, Benin in appeal No: CA/B/276/90.”

    They said: ”The Appeal Court in Benin in a unanimous decision on September 28

    1992, allowed the appeal, struck out the plaintiff/respondent’s suit before the lower court and upheld the position of the government White Paper of July 1981 that there are two ruling houses namely:Agirilala and Akaiyejo.”

    According to them, Agabaola and Ogbenuote branches did not appeal against the judgment, therefore the judgment subsists till date,” and contended that since they did not appeal against the judgment since 1992, they could not “suddenly wake up now raking up sentiment claiming that there are three ruling houses.”

    While claiming that “the kingmakers had no power to screen or disqualify any candidate under any guise,” they alleged that “the action of the kingmakers in disqualifying six of the 12 contestants suggested that they were acting the script of their paymaster(s).”

    They also called on Governor Ayo Fayose to “outrightly cancel the already suspended selection process and order a fresh process whereby all the contestants will be presented to the Ifa Oracle” saying this was “to forestall any manipulation.”

    Government has kept a studied silence on the Ikere kingship crisis but the residents are concerned that the earlier it is resolved, the better for all the stakeholders concerned.

  • Needless bickering

    Needless bickering

    •Two parastatals fight instead of working together on the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway

    The recent announcement by the Bureau for Public Procurement (BPP) that the Federal Ministry of Works should be held responsible for the current delay over the rehabilitation of the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway is symbolic of the incompetence that has come to characterise the infrastructural development programme of the Jonathan administration. Officials of the bureau claim that the ministry is yet to approach it for the Due Process Certification, and argue that the BPP cannot be held responsible for the consequent delay.

    It is truly amazing that the two vitally important parastatals are engaging in unproductive accusation and counter-accusation when they should be collaborating to ensure that one of the nation’s most important highways is given the comprehensive rehabilitation that it should have received decades ago. When the Yar’Adua administration took the decision to turn the road into a concession in 2009, there were similar delays over its constitutionality, the question of legislative approval, issues of financing and design. Those interruptions ensured that very little work was done on the expressway before the concession agreement was terminated in 2012.

    The absence of rehabilitation work has taken its toll in lives lost in accidents, wasted man-hours caused by traffic jams, as well as the robberies and assaults and property damage suffered by hapless road-users who have no choice other than to use the expressway. As the BPP and the works ministry quarrel over procedural issues, it seems that the agony is set to continue indefinitely, with all the associated costs to the country.

    Nigeria’s history has been riddled with similar disputes between agencies and ministries over questions of authority. The Bureau for Private Enterprises (BPE) under the leadership of Mallam Nasir El-Rufai was notorious for the disputes it had with ministries, trade unions, private companies and the National Assembly over several aspects of its work. The Federal Road Maintenance Agency (FERMA) spent more energy hampering the road-rehabilitation efforts of the Lagos State Government than it did on working on roads passing through the state.

    While many of these disputes may have been honest disagreements, it is also true that most of them have been motivated by baser considerations of greed and power. In this regard, it is significant that the BPP seems to be more interested in absolving itself of blame for the delay instead of seeking to ensure that it works with the ministry of works to ensure that the preliminary processes are achieved with dispatch. The long-suffering users of the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway are completely uninterested in who is responsible for what: all they want is a safe, functional highway that enables them to travel in safety and comfort.

    This is where the Federal Government comes in. Both the BPP and the ministry are under its authority. Instead of merely looking on while both disgrace themselves in an unedifying quarrel, it should move to ensure that each party does what it is supposed to do in accordance with laid-down guidelines so that the rehabilitation and reconstruction work can go ahead. If necessary, it should wield the big stick: any officer who is found to have failed to perform should be sanctioned appropriately. Nigerians are tired of excuses and explanations. All they want now is action.

     

  • Obama, Romney: bickering for America’s sake

    Obama, Romney: bickering for America’s sake

    President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney are not enemies, but for the sake of America, they are doing battles, writes OLUKOREDE YISHAU

     

    They have agreed on a few things: no military action in Syria, continuing support for sanctions against Iran and withdrawal of America’s military from Afghanistan. But their areas of disagreements are more. This is the tale of two presidential candidates: President Barack Obama and his challenger, former Governor Mitt Romney.

    Obama is today expected in the vital swing state of Ohio, where, according to the latest polls, the president has a slight lead. Romney is ahead in Florida, and Virginia is a dead heat.

    Like Obama, Romney is also stepping up his last-minute campaigns. Like they have done since their campaigns kicked off, they are going to use the next one week to paint each other in bad light.

    Romney will continue to drum it into Americans’ ears that the president has not provided a clear example of American leadership for the world, whether in Syria or Iran or Russia. He is unlikely to also change his position that the president has failed to improve the economy.

    Obama, too, will not abandon his song, which he has been playing to Americans: Romney would be unsteady on the world stage. The president’s employ of sharp and sarcastic language to cast Romney as out of depth is not likely to abate. Not with polls showing that they run neck-to-neck.

    During the last debate, Obama lampooned Romney’s promise to increase defence spending by two trillion dollars and build up the US Navy – a move which Obama claimed failed to take into account the needs of modern warfare.

    Obama said: “You mention that we have fewer ships than we had in 1916. Well, governor we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because that nature of our military has changed.

    “We also have these things called ‘aircraft carriers’ that planes land on, and ships that go under water – nuclear submarines. So the question is not a game of battleships, but what are our capabilities…and how we are going to meet the best of our defence needs.”

    On the issue of Afghanistan and al-Qaeda, Obama and Romney clashed repeatedly, with the president claiming Romney’s strategy was in a constant change of flux and in no way clear.

    The president said: “And you know, Governor Romney, I’m glad that you agree that we have been successful in going after al-Qaida, but I have to tell you that, you know, your strategy previously has been one that has been all over the map and is not designed to keep Americans safe or to build on the opportunities that exist in the Middle East.”

    On Iraq, Obama painted Romney as inexperienced, saying: “I know you haven’t been in a position to actually execute foreign policy — but every time you’ve offered an opinion, you’ve been wrong. You said we should have gone into Iraq, despite that fact that there were no weapons of mass destruction.”

    The president also took Romney on about al-Qaida. Obama said: “Governor Romney, I’m glad that you recognise that al-Qaida is a threat, because a few months ago when you were asked what’s the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said Russia, not al-Qaida; you said Russia, in the 1980s, they’re now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because, you know, the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.”

    “Both at home and abroad, he (Mr Romney) has proposed…reckless policies. He’s praised George Bush as a good economic steward and Dick Cheney as somebody who’s – who shows great wisdom and judgment. And taking us back to those kinds of strategies that got us into this mess are not the way that we are going to maintain leadership in the 21st century.”

    Romney, too, has delivered some upper-cuts on the president. Romney accuses president of ‘weakness’ abroad.

    On his methods for dealing with Russia, he said: “I’m not going to wear rose-coloured glasses when it comes to Russia, or Mr. Putin. And I’m certainly not going to say to him, I’ll give you more flexibility after the election. After the election, he’ll get more backbone.”

    He has also accused Obama of not providing the leadership at the world stage. Romney said: “I absolutely believe that America has a – a responsibility, and the privilege of helping defend freedom and promote the principles that — that make the world more peaceful. And those principles include human rights, human dignity, free enterprise, freedom of expression, elections.”

    He also believes the president has not done much to stop Iran‘s nuclear project.

    He argued that the country was “four years closer to a nuclear weapon” and that Obama has “wasted” the last four years because “they continue to be able to spin these centrifuges and get that much closer.”

    Certainly, the next one week is a crucial one in deciding who carries the day. The candidates realize this and have planned to make the best use of it.