Tag: Bill Clinton

  • Trump revokes pro-abortion law

    Trump revokes pro-abortion law

    U.S. President Donald Trump has revoked the Presidential Memorandum on Mexico City Policy and Assistance for Voluntary Population Planning, which allowed voluntary abortion in the U.S.

    Trump, who has made anti-abortion policy one of his campaign promises, announced the revocation, according to the President’s statement issued by the White House.

    “I hereby revoke the Presidential Memorandum of January 23, 2009, for the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (Mexico City Policy and Assistance for Voluntary Population Planning), and reinstate the Presidential Memorandum of January 22, 2001, for the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (Restoration of the Mexico City Policy).

    “I direct the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to the extent allowable by law, to implement a plan to extend the requirements of the reinstated Memorandum to global health assistance furnished by all departments or agencies.

    “I further direct the Secretary of State to take all necessary actions, to the extent permitted by law, to ensure that U.S. taxpayer dollars do not fund organisations or programmes that support or participate in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilisation.”

    Trump said: “the memorandum was not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person”.

    “The Secretary of State is authorised and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register,” Trump’s statement read.

    With the revocation, Trump has barred U.S  federal funding for foreign NGOs that support abortion, relaunching a battle that has long divided Americans.

    The abrogation came just two days after women led a massive protest march in Washington to defend their rights, including to abortion.

    The decision to ban foreign aid to groups that lobby in support of abortion rights is certain to deepen concern among already apprehensive U.S. family planning and women’s rights organisations, according to observers.

    Stenny Hoyer, a Democratic leader in the House of Representatives, sharply criticised Trump for using his first week in office “to attack women’s health”.

    “It should be no surprise to the millions of women and men who gathered in protest this weekend across the country and around the world that Republicans are focused more on making it harder for women to access health care than on the serious economic and security challenges we face.”

    The restrictions imposed on Monday prohibit foreign nongovernmental organisations that receive U.S. family planning assistance from using a non-U.S. funding to provide abortion services, information, counselling or referrals and from engaging in advocacy to promote abortion.

    They were first put in place in 1984 by Republican president Ronald Reagan.

    Later eliminated by Democratic president Bill Clinton, they were reinstalled by his Republican successor George W. Bush, and annulled again after Barack Obama took office.

    Galvanised by Trump’s November 8, 2016 election, abortion opponents in states where Republicans held power moved swiftly in December 2016 to adopt draconian anti-abortion measures that in some cases pose challenges to constitutional liberties.

    Trump, meanwhile, has pledged to nominate an anti-abortion justice to the Supreme Court, which could lead to overturning Roe Wade, the emblematic ruling that legalised abortion in the U.S. in 1973.

  • ‎How AUN is using technology to tackle illiteracy

    ‎How AUN is using technology to tackle illiteracy

    The American University of Nigeria has being leading the fight against illiteracy in Yola, Adamawa state capital and other states in the North East. Faith Yahaya who visited Yola recently, writes on the school and its effort to reduce illiteracy among school children in the region.

    A survey conducted sometime ago by UNESCO’s showed that despite moves to better the country’s education system, about 65 million Nigerians remain illiterate.

    The pointer here is that we do not need soothsayers to tell us that the statistic is alarming and as a matter of national urgency, we need to work to redress our literacy crisis. The issue of illiteracy especially how to reduce or eradicate it has come up at different fora, but can it be reduced or eradicated?

    There are so many children who are out of school, while those in school right now cannot boast of even getting the quality education they desire, as there are fundamental issues to be addressed. Are the teachers well trained, is the environment conducive and are the policy makers introducing right policy that will encourage better learning?

    The usual maxim we get is that Nigerians or blacks don’t read, but how do we instil the culture of reading into kids when statistics has it that 35 million Nigerian adults are illiterate?

    Another point that has come to fore is the fact that children of illiterate parents are likely to be illiterate themselves, except in rare cases. This is a fact that we are faced with whether we admit it or not. The situation of illiteracy became worse in some parts of the country with attacks by Boko Haram on some communities which left so many displaced.

    To underscore the importance of education, many people have come up with ideas of how illiteracy and poverty which have been the bane of our society can be addressed.

    The former United States of America President, Bill Clinton, said literacy is not a luxury”, but a right and a responsibility”, but how many people have this so called right in Nigeria?

    According to former United Nations Secretary General, Dr Kofi Anan, “Literacy is a bridge from misery to hope. It is a basic tool for daily life in modern society. It is a wall against poverty, and a building block of development. Literacy is a vehicle for the promotion of cultural and national identity”

    Nelson Mandela also said that education is the most powerful weapon which one can use to change the world.

    There is no denying that literacy is vital to the achievement of every growth index but despite this, illiteracy has continued to be problem.

    To successfully confront poverty, disease, religious fanaticism, political chaos, ethnic bigotry, gender discrimination, economic depression among others, collective efforts must be made to enhance the literary level.

    With the continuous increase in illiteracy level, an expert has said Nigeria needs to do a lot if it wants to remain relevant in the world.

    The African Development Information marked the North Eastern zone of Nigeria as the least educated region in the federation with 52.4 percent uneducated males and 61.1 percent uneducated females.

    With this worrisome statistics, an education expert, the President of the American University of Nigeria (AUN), Prof. Margee Ensign stated that the level of illiteracy ravaging the northeast can be eradicated in three years.

    To eradicate illiteracy, Prof. Ensign said policy makers need to adopt technology noting that if it is done, north-eastern Nigeria will wave illiteracy bye. While she also suggested a shift from the traditional mode of teaching which is the use of classrooms and chalkboard or marker to embracing technology, Ensign however stressed that “What is important is the demographics.

    Nigeria is one of the fastest growing countries in the world with a population of about 180 million now. Do you know where the population will be in the next 26 years? Just double it and that will make Nigeria 360million. How are you going to educate the kids that are born everyday? It is really important that policy makers think about it because with the piece of statistics, it is really unfortunate that Nigeria has more children out of school than any other country in the world. Nigeria has millions of illiterates and now with the insurgency, 2 million more have been added to this groups of people. With these statistics, do you think you have time to do things the traditional way? It is not possible but that is what the policy makers are saying.

    The policy makers are saying you should build schools, train teachers but the fact is that, many of the children in schools now don’t get an education that will prepare them to have an income or prepare them to be productive citizens of the country. So, I really believe there is only one way to do it and that is technology and that is why we are pioneering the use of technology in Yola and the Northeast”.

    Besides, since the solution for Nigeria’s rapidly growing population and for education is technology, she agreed that Nigeria can do it well, “It is not the second best solution, I think if we do it well, Nigeria will leapfrog. If we don’t do it in the traditional way, we are going to teach these kids how to learn by accessing information, by having critical thinking skills to evaluate things and they will be the model for the world but we are not there yet because we don’t have approval to do those things and that is why someone needs to shakeup the people at the top really hard. I would love to have the approval to offer this education in a blended format in every major city in this country so that people can learn both online and in person. The research shows that it is the best way to do it. So, it is not the second best solution to use technology but the best but the policy makers are not there yet,” she added.

    She also disclosed that the school initiated a programme called Feed and Read as part of ways to impact knowledge into young kids, noting that It is the children on the street who are learning how to read, half of them are listening to radio while half are on tablet computers. With this initiative, kids learn in matter of months. “With the programme, the children read well, they have confidence and that is how Nigeria is going to change quickly because Nigeria does not have a lot of time and if we don’t educate the 2 million who are out of school in the northeast plus 14 million who are already out of school, we are going to have social unrest for a very long time. So, these people must have education, they must learn how to have

    income, they must learn new skills. We are basically doing model projects in Yola and it will scale them up to the northeast and then they can go anywhere in the country”.

    Having suggested technology as the panacea to eradicating illiteracy, it is high time we look in that direction. At individual level, we need to be better at making parents throughout the country aware of the critical importance learning and education play in their children’s future. A child who can read and write sufficiently will enjoy better employment prospects, better earning capacity, better access to healthcare and be less likely to face social exclusion. Reducing illiteracy should therefore be viewed as an investment, rather than a cost, for both the governments and households. Overcoming illiteracy in Nigeria will require a long-term commitment from governments, NGOs, educators and parents. We can no longer look to just one group to provide solutions or outcomes and that is why we need to work together to implement reforms and programmes like the one suggested by Prof. Ensign.

  • Between Jonathan and Buhari

    Between Jonathan and Buhari

    IR: Great men like John F. Kennedy battled with infidelity as president, Richard Nixon lied his way out of the presidency, Bill Clinton almost got impeached because of acts of impropriety but they were, and are, people, that history cannot do without: they made, are part of, and are history.

    So much has been written about General Muhammadu Buhari, warts and all.  Buhari like many other statesmen is fortunate; he is popular with the teeming population of the underprivileged in society, those that really matter in the electorate process despite elitist blackmail.

    Goodluck Jonathan is also a lucky man; first, he rode to the presidency on pure happenstance and later got his first mandate through goodwill of Nigerians in 2011.

    Whose way will victory go between the incumbent president (PDP) and General Muhammadu Buhari (APC) in the forth-coming presidential elections in February 2015?

    It is clearly a tough call. But some analysts have submitted that barring all untoward circumstances and if we are to have a free and fair contest now, the odds will be against the incumbent.

    He has been equated with Lyndon Johnson who rode to the presidency on the benevolence of the American people after the death of the much loved Kennedy but was too overwhelmed to seek re-election on principle in the end, due to his poor handling of foreign policy (Vietnam).

    Can Buhari provide Nigerians with an experience to take us to seventh heaven? Aren’t Nigerians expecting too much from Buhari? Is there a chance that his much-vaunted, probable victory might be likened to that of Jimmy Carter who defeated Gerald Ford to become president due to his high belief in himself, with only a couple of thousands of votes out of millions less in Ohio, Hawaii and Delaware because the electorate wanted someone with more experience?

    What hope does the incumbent have in western Nigeria with no-nonsense leaders who have been able to strike strategic alliances with the north?

    What hope does President Jonathan have in the north west and north east? The elites from those regions say he has a chance, but they should know better. He would have had a major chance had zoning been allowed to stay in that party. Most elites do not vote, the browbeaten masses do, and these will follow the principle of “group think” to vote for Buhari.

    Certainly President Jonathan will carry the day in the eastern part of Nigeria. Regrettably unlike the West, the East has not totally accepted national politics and are still seething from the plagues of the Biafra war which they accuse the north of directing. He is likely to carry the north-central region that, like the east, are yet to carve a political identity for itself.

    Without a doubt we need a leader who can help define Nigeria for Nigeria. A leader that can stand toe-to-toe with world leaders without a subservient complex, who will be a big brother in Africa, who will go to war if need be to prevent factions from using their territory to plan insurrection against our country. He must be ready to submit himself to microscopic inspection and shirt-front daring religious leaders who pronounce dangerous diktats.

    Someone who understands the power of reason must be ready to enforce the secular make-up of our nation to respect people of all faiths. Someone who knows what politics is all about: solving problems.

    I have long ago made up my mind (even as a non-card carrying member of any political party) to vote Muhammadu Buhari in 2015 if he becomes the presidential flag-bearer of a major party for this simple fact: that it will be detrimental to our democracy if Nigeria becomes a one-party state and if we do not change our leaders from party to party and from time to time.

     

    • Simon Abah,

    Port Harcourt, Rivers State

  • Maya Angelou  remembered at  memorial service

    Maya Angelou remembered at memorial service

    THE family, friends and famous admirers of US author and activist Maya Angelou have held a private memorial service in her honour in North Carolina.

    US First Lady Michelle Obama, former President Bill Clinton and media mogul Oprah Winfrey were among the speakers.

    Mrs Obama said her words sustained her through life, carrying “a little black girl from the South Side of Chicago all the way to the White House”.

    Angelou died at home in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, last week, aged 86.

    Mr Clinton praised Angelou for her belief in dignity, love and kindness, and spoke of a time in Angelou’s childhood when “she could not speak”.

    “And then she developed the greatest voice on the planet,” he said. “God loaned her His voice. She had the voice of God, and He decided he wanted it back for a while.”

    Angelou wrote the poem On the Pulse of Morning and read it at Mr Clinton’s first presidential inauguration in 1993.

    The service was held at Wake Forest University’s chapel in Winston-Salem, where Angelou taught for three decades.

    The family has asked the public to make donations to the Maya Angelou Center for Health Equity in lieu of bringing flowers to the campus.