Tag: Brics

  • BRICS: Nigeria better off as non-aligned nation, says Okechukwu

    BRICS: Nigeria better off as non-aligned nation, says Okechukwu

    The Director-General of Voice of Nigeria, (VON) Mr. Osita Okechukwu yesterday gave kudos to President Bola Tinubu for rejecting the country from joining the BRICS economic group. The founding member of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) said the President deserves the commendation of all Nigerians for not applying to join the emergent grouping.

     At the 15th BRICS Summit in South Africa, the bloc admitted Argentina, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, among other intending developing countries into its folds, thus fuelling speculations that Nigeria’s application was rejected for not meeting some crucial membership criteria. But, in a statement made available to newsmen in Abuja, Okechukwu declared that Nigeria is better off maintaining her decades-old diplomatic standpoint as a non-aligned.

    Read Also: Six countries join BRICS as summit ends South Africa

     He noted that he was thrilled when the Vice President, Senator Kashim Shettima, recently cleared the air and said, “So far, we have not applied for the membership of BRICS. And it is majorly informed by the fact that my principal, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, is a true democrat that believes in consensus building.” The APC chieftain argued that Nigeria is better maintaining her age-long diplomatic policy and standpoint. According to him, “Whereas one has nothing against Brazil, Russia, India, China nor our brothers South Africa that make up the BRICS; however Nigeria stands to benefit hugely if we maintain our age-old standpoint of multilateral diplomacy.”

     He pointed out the worldview origin of BRICS, saying, “records have it that to spur economic development outside the Breton wood system, the BRICS, a bloc comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China and later South Africa, was formed. Ironically, the acronym was coined in 2001 by Goldman Sachs and 2006, the bank opened an equity fund for investors in the BRICS. The group had since established New Development Bank (NDB).”

     On the proposal that Nigeria’s membership of BRICS has economic growth as the main goal, Okechukwu argued that whilst economic growth is important, it should not be at the expense of Nigeria’s cherished freedom and rule of law, which the leadership of the bloc abhors. “Whilst one agrees that BRICS may engender economic growth; however neither the West nor Russia or China is father Xmas. Therefore, our destiny is in our hands. And most importantly, we cannot gloss over our cherished freedom and rule of law which may be in jeopardy in the BRICS alliance. Otherwise, at the last count, the New Development Bank (NDB), a multilateral lending institution set up in 2014, based in Shanghai, had $25bn in recorded assets in 2022, less than a tenth of the World Bank’s total, and not much economic growth was stimulated,” Okechukwu explained.

     Accordingly, he appealed to President Tinubu to maintain Nigeria’s multilateral diplomatic strategy, which allows Nigeria today and in the future to operate and relate freely with all blocs and ultimately guide jealousy our national interest.

  • Two reasons Nigeria is not part of BRICS

    Two reasons Nigeria is not part of BRICS

    Many observers have been asking if the new administration of President Bola Tinubu is likely to join the BRICS group of nations or not. 

    They believe such a membership would be of immense benefits to Nigeria, in addition to signposting her as a respectable force in the comity of nations.

    Nigeria’s vice president, Kashim Shettima, was assigned to represent President Tinubu at the 15th BRICS Summit of Heads of State and Government scheduled for the Sandton Convention Centre, Johannesburg from August 22 to 24.

    The admission of six new countries into the BRICS has further expanded its geopolitical influence.

    Argentina, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates will be admitted as full members from January 1, next year. 

    BRICS is an acronym taken from the first letters of the countries that constitute the group: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa

    It was coined in 2001 by then Goldman Sachs chief economist, Jim O’Neill in a research paper that underlined the growth potential of Brazil, Russia, India and China.

    They are the arrowhead of emerging countries determined to challenge the dominance of the United States of America and its Western allies in global affairs. 

    BRIC entered the scene in 2006 as an alliance of four emerging economies. 

    These nations were identified as possessing significant growth potential and influence on the global stage. Subsequently, South Africa joined the group in 2010, transforming the acronym to BRICS.

    The group is not a formal multilateral organisation like the United Nations, World Bank or the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).

    The heads of state and government of the member nations convene annually with each nation taking up a one-year rotating chairmanship of the group.

    According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), BRICS has evolved into one of the world’s most critical economic blocs, representing over a quarter of the global GDP and 42 percent of the world’s population.

    India, Brazil and South Africa, which are regional powers in their respective continents and make up the other members of BRIC, have their mini agenda. 

    Unlike Russia and China, they do not have any political and economic issues with the US and its allies. The three are countries with entrenched democratic structures which the US favours. Economically, the three have excellent economic relations with the US.

    Read Also: Putin offers to host next BRICS summit in Russia

    Although views are divergent within BRICS on the parameters for admitting new members, about 23 countries had applied for membership. 

    Observers believe Nigeria should be interested in what is taking place at the BRICS arena, as part of finding strategic solutions to Nigeria’s economic problems. 

    In 2014, the Nigerian government took the decision to rebase the Nigerian GDP so that it accounted for all aspects that were not accounted for by the way Nigeria had calculated its GDP until 2014. 

    The result was an 89% expansion in the Nigerian GDP and its jump to the 26th largest economy in the World ahead of South Africa at 34.

    So South Africa was included because it was the larger developing world economy at the time much larger than Nigeria until 2014.

  • Nigeria’s self-styled Macron wants to win power by ending corruption

    First there were the Brics. After coining that acronym in 2001, Jim O’Neill, then chief economist at Goldman Sachs, came up with the “Next Eleven” two years later, identifying 11 economies capable of joining the Brics as the world’s fastest-growing. Fidelity Investments developed this further when, in 2011, it identified the Mint economies, which it said could prove as rewarding for investors over the next decade as the Brics had been in the previous decade.

    The Mints — Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey — have not kept that promise. Indonesia probably has been the most reliable, its economy growing at just under 5 per cent or more in every year since 2011. Turkey and Mexico have delivered variable growth. The worst of the four and the biggest disappointment by far has been Nigeria, which slid into recession in 2016, going on to achieve GDP growth of only 0.8 per cent last year.

    Yet Nigeria boasts vast resources and huge potential. It is the world’s seventh most populous nation and by the middle of the century the United Nations expects it to be the third largest, with its population doubling from the present 200 million. Moreover, that population is urbanising rapidly, with Lagos projected to become the world’s biggest city by population by 2100.

    As well as one of the world’s youngest and fastest-growing populations, Nigeria enjoys vast natural resources, most obviously oil and gas. It owns 2.2 per cent of proven global oil reserves, according to the BP Statistical Review of World Energy, while accounting for 1.3 per cent of global natural gas production. It also boasts generous gold, lead, zinc, coal and uranium reserves.

    Why, then, does Nigeria’s economy underperform so dramatically? The most obvious answer is corruption. Nigeria is ranked 148th out of 180 in the latest corruption perceptions index published by Transparency International. Corruption and poverty go hand-in-hand, poverty is still rising and so is the jobless rate, because GDP growth is not keeping pace with population growth.

    All this will be keenly debated in Nigeria’s presidential election, due in February next year, in which the incumbent, Muhammadu Buhari, will be standing. So, too, will be Atiku Abubakar, one of the candidates of the People’s Democratic Party, the party of former presidents Goodluck Jonathan and Olusegun Obasanjo, under whom Mr Abubakar served as vice president.

    The most intriguing candidate is Kingsley Moghalu, a former deputy governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria and candidate of the Young Progressive Party. A lawyer who worked for the United Nations for 17 years and who was educated in Nigeria, the United States and Britain (he has a PhD in international relations from the London School of Economics), Mr Moghalu presents himself as a thoroughly modern presidential candidate in the mould of Emmanuel Macron.

    Last week, while on a visit to the UK, he said: “One of the major things I am going to do is move away from dependence on oil and move the economy towards innovation. We will have to look very seriously at the philosophical foundations that drive successful capitalist economies, make sure that there’s property rights, make sure that there’s innovation, make sure that there is capital. I shall be introducing a major venture capital fund that is going to fund small businesses and stimulate the economy.”

    Mr Moghalu’s policy prescription also includes more infrastructure investment. He accepts that while Nigeria has benefited from the process of “leapfrogging”, where a lack of landlines has encouraged rapid take-up of mobile technology and a lack of established electricity grids has enabled the rapid adoption of off-grid solar power, that can go only so far: “Nigeria, in particular, has a very high level of mobile phone technology and that’s a good thing, but I don’t think you can apply leapfrogging to every aspect of development. I still think Nigeria needs an industrial base. You can’t go into a post-industrial society, as some people recommend, without having been an industrial society.”

    The would-be president also has controversial views on Chinese investment in Africa. He says that many African nations have not benefited as they should have done, arguing that a lot of the continent’s leaders have lacked the “intellectual soundness” to drive a harder bargain with the Chinese. He argues it has exacerbated debt traps around Africa and increased dependency on foreign loans. Two thirds of taxes raised in Nigeria go on servicing its debts.

    Another key policy of Mr Moghalu is greater equality for women. He argues that Nigeria’s education and legal systems prevent too many women from reaching their potential and is promising a 50-50 gender balance in his ministerial appointments.

    But is Nigeria ready for a technocratic president? Mr Moghalu, who points to his work nation-building in Rwanda, Angola and the former Yugoslavia during his time at the UN, insists that it is. Pointing out that the country has become poorer since it became a democracy in 1999, he argued: “The people of Nigeria are tired of the old, recycled and corrupt political class, which President Buhari’s government represents.”

    Many will wish him luck. If this is to be the African century, the continent’s biggest country must fulfil its economic potential. If it does not and poverty continues to grow, the chances are that an increasing proportion of Nigeria’s growing population will head elsewhere, adding to the global migration crisis.

    .Ian King is the business presenter for Sky News.

  • Venezuela to apply for BRICS membership

    Venezuelan President, Nicolas Maduro, said Thrudady that he has requested the foreign ministry to prepare ground for the country to join BRICS.

    The group is made up of emerging countries, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

    “As we have seen in the past few years the BRICS has motivated many developing nations like Venezuela.

    “That is why I have asked Foreign Minister, Delcy Rodriguez, to advance conversations to join them in the near future,” said Maduro in an interview granted a local broadcaster.

    He said he would propose to the member nations of the left leaning Bolivarian Alliance for the People of Our Americas (ALBA) to become part of the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB).

    The bank has an initial capital of 100 billion dollars.

    Maduro highlighted the quickness of economic decisions taken by the BRICS member nations and the political will of its leaders to advance toward a new world order based on equality and social development.

    The BRICS has become an important platform for exchanges and cooperation among the world’s major emerging economies.

  • And BRICS shun that niggling ‘N’

    We were really out of that league anyway, but illusions of grandeur have almost become our national ethos. First we brand ourselves the ‘giant of Africa’. We boast of a large landmass and an impressively large and ravenously growing population, but we are shy to probe the quality of that population. Is it a mass of hopeless hoi polloi? We have huge hydrocarbon wealth that providence graciously heaped under our soil, but as the joke goes, providence also bequeathed us with very dull scoundrels as princes of the land. Thus for 50 years of crude exploration, we still export crude to import premium fuel, which is the equivalence of exporting gold and buying lead in return. And at premium price too!

    Oh, how illusive can a people be! The other day we woke up from a bad hangover and we simply started singing ‘Vision 20 – 2020’. They said they saw a vision that Nigeria would rank among the top 20 nations in the world by 2020; that is six years from today. Someone actually said that whoever had that dream was suffering from acute malaria infection. But Hardball wagers that it was a case of drunken stupor. But whatever the ailment may have been, the incubus has dissipated and V-20-2020 has been quietly abandoned or conveniently forgotten.

    We also love ranking and feel good grandiosities. Every now and then we inveigle the West’s chief sovereign rating agencies like Fitch to find some way to put in a nice sidebar for us in their ratings of civilised economies. Recently, when it seemed we had emptied our bag of tricks, we reached down and made our National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) to gerrymander some hoary figures in what it called rebasing of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). And voila, Nigeria has suddenly and magically become the largest economy on the continent; ahead of South Africa and Egypt. It’s a hoax, isn’t it?

    But today, Hardball is taking in by the action of the group of countries known as BRICS, which stands for: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Straightaway, these are serious countries with well tracked economies, with strong production and export bases and, most important, with patriotic leaders who will die for their motherland. They are countries with visionary leaders who have primed their economies on a 30 to 50-year trajectory and it is only a matter of time before they catch up with the highly developed countries of the West.

    Sometime ago, our Nigerian jesters tried to smuggle in our niggardly ‘N’ into BRICS to make it into a better-sounding BRINCS. What a laugh, they must have thought: Nigeria that cannot even light up her presidential villa; a country that cannot even protect her most important asset – crude oil. A big-for-nothing country that cannot run her seaport; we will pick ‘N’ for Niger Republic first, at least she can run a refinery or Benin Republic which runs a better port than Nigeria, the BRICS would have scoffed.

    Last week, the BRICS countries launched a new multi-national development bank which will serve as a veritable counterpoise to the World Bank and other huge finance institutions of the West. And say, who wants a Nigger in his woodpile? Besides, BRINCS sounds ominously like BRINKS, doesn’t it?

  • BRICS nations to create $100b development bank

    The leaders of the five Brics countries have signed a deal to create a new $100bn (£58.3bn) development bank and emergency reserve fund.

    The Brics group is made up of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

    The capital for the bank will be split equally among the five participating countries.

    The bank will have a headquarters in Shanghai, China and the first president for the bank will come from India.

    Brazil’s President, Dilma Rousseff, announced the creation of the bank at a Brics summit meeting in Fortaleza, Brazil on Tuesday.

    The halls of Fortaleza’s conference centre were full of whispers about whether or not these Brics nations – which often see one another  more as rivals than friends – could agree a deal on the development bank.

    But challenges were overcome and the announcements were made. Despite their political and economic differences, the one thing these countries do agree upon is that rich countries have too much power in institutions like the World Bank and the IMF.

    Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff’s comments made that feeling crystal clear – the Brics countries, she said, have the power to introduce positive changes – ones that they think are more equal and fair.

    At first, the bank will start off with $50bn in initial capital.

    The emergency reserve fund – which was announced as a “Contingency Reserve Arrangement” – will also have $100bn, and will help developing nations avoid “short-term liquidity pressures, promote further Brics cooperation, strengthen the global financial safety net and complement existing international arrangements”.

    The creation of the Brics bank will almost surely create competition for both the World Bank and other similar regional funds.

    Brics nations have criticised the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund for not giving developing nations enough voting rights.

  • Insights from a rebased economy

    Insights from a rebased economy

    It is amazing what great transformation a little recalibration – beg your pardon, rebasing – has wrought on the profile of the Nigerian economy.

    For two full decades, we tormented ourselves with guilt that the economy was underperforming, what with a GDP that stood at a piddling $283 billion. Following the re-basing, we now know that the GDP actually stands at a roaring $510 billion, pushing South Africa to a distant second in Africa in that department and sending powerful warning signals to the world that the Nigerian juggernaut has finally arrived.

    Our consuming desire, which seemed more an exorbitant declaration intent than a remote possibility, was to enter the ranks of the world’s largest economies, the so-called G20, by the year 2020. Every indication now is that Nigeria will hit that milestone several years ahead of projection. Our planners will now have to rebase Vision 20/20:20 itself.

    Several decades ago, the per capita GDP was a paltry $1,500, which placed Nigeria in the same unproductive bracket as India and Ghana. As if that was not bad enough, some misguided Nigerians developed the pernicious habit of holding up the economies of those two countries as models of growth and stability.

    Now we know that Nigeria’s per capital GDP stands at $2,989, places it well outside their league. The acronym BRIC once designated the rising global economic bloc comprising Brazil, Russia, India and China. Then, it was enlarged to BRICS, to accommodate South Africa and, it would now seem in retrospect, to spite Nigeria.

    With the galloping profile of Nigeria’s economy as revealed by the recent rebasing, global leaders of economic thought are set to drop South Africa from that league and replace it with Nigeria, which they consider more worthy of the distinction. With that change, and in the interest of euphony, I gather from the best authorities that the league will henceforth be known as BRINC.

    Good riddance, then, to South Africa, the upstart that was always thumbing its ungrateful post-apartheid nose at the Big Benefactor up North. Living well, it has been said, is the best revenge. So out with BRICS, and in with BRINC.

    For decades, the conventional wisdom was that the manufacturing sector in Nigeria was in great distress if not positively doomed, and that some industries were relocating to Ghana where the business climate was allegedly more friendly. Everyone blamed the epileptic power supply for the poor state of manufacturing

    The rebasing shows indeed that manufacturing has suffered a decline, but not to the extent of validating the conventional wisdom that the power supply, especially electricity, is a cardinal factor in the calculus of economic growth and development. .

    In the United States where power supply is guaranteed round the clock except in the face of the direst disasters, Wall Street erupts in champagne-drenched celebration and the stock market index rises sharply if the economy manages to record a 2 percent growth.

    But in Nigeria where power is severely rationed if and when it is available, the economy has been growing at a pace more than three time faster than that of the United States. And whereas manufacturing is in precipitous decline in the United States, in Nigeria it has taken only a 50 percent tumble.

    Meanwhile, following the rebasing, it has come to light not merely that the economy has all the while been growing at a dizzying, superheated 7 percent a year.

    It follows, then, that the importance of electricity has been vastly exaggerated.The question must now be asked: Who needs a steady power supply when the economy is growing at such a furious gallop?

    Conventional wisdom has also been upended in many other areas of the economy, following the rebasing. The rate of employment used to be considered an indication of the health of the economy. Employment increased as the economy grew, they said. But the Nigerian example shows conclusively that jobless rate can actually increase sharply or stay stagnant even as economy expands.

    So, why make a fetish of job creation? Why take up all that trouble and expend so much imagination cooking numbers reflecting progress in job creation when the economy is doing just fine without it? Why the national lament that more than half a million persons subjected themselves to accidental death crippling exertions to fill 4,000 advertised positions – why bemoan this when the economy is growing at such a breath-taking pace?

    Again, they used to claim that you cannot build a strong economy without a good road network and sound transportation system. But our rebased economy has just debunked that claim by building the world’s 26th largest economy without freight trains and without anything that can be called water transportation, propelled only by express passenger trains that take a whole day to travel the roughly 240km from Lagos to Ilorin?

    Who really needs all that infrastructure? Certainly not the economy.

    Consider yet another factor that economists are always trumpeting as indispensable to growth and development: stability. As far as I know, nobody has ever accused Nigeria of pursuing, much less attaining, stability. Everywhere you turn – in the neighbourhoods, on the highways, in the professions, in the universities, in the policy establishments, in the motor parks, in police stations and army barracks and even in the precincts of the Presidential Villa, instability reigns.

    To cite practical examples from the policy establishment: One day they are banning rice imports to conserve foreign exchange and encourage local industry. The next day, they undo the ban, saying that only big-time smugglers are profiting from it.

    Again, one day they ban wheat imports and declare that cassava bread will replace wheat bread as the favourite item on the nation’s breakfast table; the next day, they launch a national wheat-production programme.

    But the really exciting thing is that, far from acting as a brake on economic growth, instability has actually been a spur.

    There is no other way to explain the robust expansion the rebased economy has witnessed in two decades of acute instability. It will come as no surprises if it turned out on further rebasing that the North-east and the Plateau-Bauchi axis constitute the fastest-growing and most productive regions in Nigeria.

    In light of these profound insights that rebasing the economy has yielded and many others that I cannot do justice to in this piece, economists will have to rework – beg your pardon one more time — rebase, recalibrate, readjust or re-whatever their old theories and revise the standard texts.

     

    From Himself the Igodomigodo

    “My Own Big Brother,

    “I called your line yesterday to show my cornucopious appreciation to you for your munificent words and the very nice things you said of me in your hebdomadal pantagruelian and yet dialectical didactic (pardon my alliteration) column (“To Patrick Obahagbon, from a kindred soul,” April 7, 2014).

    “The panegyrics coming from a literary avatar and a sui generis lollapalloza that I have admired his inimitable, intrepid and polyvalent style for a period of aeon was an anodyne for me.

    “I thank you for everything and may your utilitarian pen never suffer any hiatus or atrophy.

    “Thanks my Senior Brother. I will keep in touch.”

    Say it for the Hon Patrick Obahiagbon. He never disappoints.

  • Brics of change and hope

    Brics of change and hope

    This week in Durban, S Africa and for the fifth time in recent times, five nations met for a meeting to determine

    their financial fortunes and future by pooling their resources to help themselves, nations in their various environments and ultimately the whole world. The countries are Brazil, Russia, India, China and S Africa now popularly called the Brics nations – from an acronym of the first letters of their respective names. So its not as if one does not know the correct spelling of bricks as in ‘bricks and mortars’ but I reckon it is better to get used as quickly as possible to the vocabulary of change and hope for the developing nations of the world that the community of Brics nations – the leading global emerging markets represent in the present age and time.

    I explore today the promise of the nations in Brics for a new world order in the light of events concerning them individually in recent times as well as the conclusions and strategy that have emerged from their Durban meeting ; and what that portends for the future of the entire world in terms of growth and prosperity. I also share with readers my experience at the 5th Bola Tinubu Colloquium that I attended at MUSON which had as its theme – Beyond the Merger; ‘A National Movement For Change‘ –A New Generation Speaks -to mark the 61st Anniversary of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the former governor of Lagos State and co author of the best selling book, ‘Financialism‘- How the financial system drains the economy.

    Let me track the Brics nation first by events that concern or emanate from their domains this last week or days. First is Brazil which had to close one of the stadia it is to use for the 2016 Olympics because of stadium cover problems but which just signed a 30bn dollar buffer agreement with China which guarantees it that much in times of liquidity crunch or financial crisis like the global melt down of 2008. Next is Russia whose self- exiled Jewish oligarch Boris Berezosky was said to have died from hanging in London according to British police. India as at now is getting negative publicity from the way its authorities have not been able to nail in the bud the menace of rape in its major cities and towns. The Chinese public on its own is enthralled with the emergence of the beautiful wife of China’s new president Xi Jinping on the world stage and her accompanying her husband on the foreign state visits , a rarity for China’s leaders since the purge of the wife of late Chairman Mao after the Cultural Revolution. Also in spite of the euphoria of hosting the Brics nations’ fifth meeting, S. Africa braces itself for the inevitable as the great but legendary icon, Nelson Mandela, is admitted to hospital for respiratory ailment. Indeed at the Bola Tinubu Colloquium last Thursday, I had to hold my breath when the Chairman of the Colloquium, Nobel laureate Professor Wole Soyinka asked for a moment of silence for the dead as I thought he was going to mention Mandela but it turned out he was remembering the late Chinua Achebe and Chief Wole Awolowo who both died recently.

    Let us go back to the Brics nations, this time as a composite unit. Given the organization of the two – day event preceded by a business forum the Brics Summit seemed to be modeled after CHOGM – the Commonwealth Heads of Governments meeting, which Nigeria hosted in 2005. A Brics Business Forum has been formed as such to deepen economic ties between member nations. Most importantly an Infrastructure and Development Bank is to be formed although not immediately but within a year. In a CNN interview India’s Finance Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram handled the announcement of this calmly but masterfully. He told the frantic CNN reporter anxious about the domiciliation of the Brics Development Bank that the planning has commenced and its location will be agreed by member nations. On the issue of a shift of world economic power from US and Western Europe being on the way, as the questioner said, the Indian Minister eloquently and firmly said the shift of global economic power has already shifted from the west to the east especially Asia and there was nothing anyone can do about it. Which really thrilled me no end the way it was said and that brings me to the crux of the matter and that is that the Durban fifth Brics nations meeting which was an important and historic meeting. To me it is indeed similar to the post second world war Bretton Woods agreement of the victorious allies – mainly US, Britain, and France who set up the World Bank and IMF for infrastructural development and loans under ideological conditions of free market economies and democracy for borrowers, a situation which has brought many economies to poverty and misery subsequently on taking the loans. This has culminated in the unfortunate creation of another acronym on debts and dread of defaults for nations now called PIGS- namely Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and Spain now the pauper nations of the euro zone, being bailed out now by Germany, which itself was reconstructed from the ruins of war by funds provided by the US Marshall Plan. So in effect then the Brics Development Bank will rise out of the collapse or withering away of the Bretton Woods Agreement of yesteryears and its aftermath; and from the ashes of the failed IMF loan conditionalities which had no regard for the social costs inherent in loan conditions of layoffs and austerity measures that treated human capital like cold figures and inanimate objects.

    More importantly though the Brics nations in Durban acknowledged and appreciated the efforts of the euro zone to get out of its financial crisis and is willing to learn from it but will not be hurried unduly on the path of economic growth it has chosen, by the western media. The fact that the first foreign state visit of China’s new President was to Russia and on the way to Durban showed cohesion in the workings and strategies of the Brics nations. As at now China is the biggest global consumer of oil and Russia its biggest supplier and oil is a dollar business and even the US whose currency it is, is not a member of Brics. So who is calling the shots in the global oil business other than these two Brics nations? Surely nobody but them and definitely not the US.

    In the case of Russia whose leader Vladmir Putin followed his Chinese guest to Durban so closely, the death of the Jewish oligarch Berezosky may be a sort of relief given the way Putin and his predecessor in office Boris Yeltsin were beholden to the Jewish oligarchs in Russia. In the early nineties when Yeltsin succeeded Gorbachev in the post Glasnost era and the marketisation of the Russian economy was underway in a highly charged and lawless manner, Yeltsin reportedly needed funds to run the Russian economy and win reelection as the Communists were poised to return to power. Yeltsin then evolved the–loans for shares deal –with the seven oligarchs, six of whom were Jews, and included Berezosky and Chelsea football club owner Abramovich. The deal enabled Yeltsin to have funds and win reelection but left Russia’s prize industries – oil, nickel, aluminium – in the hands of the oligarchs who became immensely rich. Putin too agreed to the deal before coming to power but changed his mind on coming to office in 2001 saying that he would separate power from capital and there will not be any political elite from amongst the oligarchs. He then went after those critical of his regime, which forced some like Abramovich and the late Berezosky into exile – and eventual death for Berezosky.

    Lastly let me make some observations on the Bola Tinubu Colloquium which like the Brics nations Durban Summit was the fifth one. Let me state again that apart from that similarity I see a greater similarity in comparing the great Mandela and the man after whom the Colloquium in Lagos has been named. In different contexts and time both have fought bravely for human rights and democracy. Before Mandela was sentenced to 27 years in jail, he told his prosecutors that he believed that only violent action would bring apartheid down and he said it in open court and even his colleagues were afraid he would be hanged but he was given a long prison sentence instead by the racist regime. On coming to power Mandela ruled with magnanimity and did not unleash the weapons of retaliation, nationalization and confiscation of his neighbor Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe, on the whites in S Africa and thus ensured political stability in S Africa till today even as he seems about to make his ultimate rendez vous with mortality.

    At the Bola Tinubu Colloquium Professor Wole Soyinka sounded the alarm that we may be a nation at war without our knowing and it is time to brace ourselves as such, especially with the Boko Haram in the south west. Aside from the Nobel Laureate’s observation however nobody has done more than Asiwaju Bola Tinubu to keep the one party state we have become inadvertently, on its toes in terms of offering alternative leadership and security for our nation and people. He has done this by studying the problems of our unique democracy and coming out with meaningful suggestions and solutions that even his opponents and traducers have to acknowledge in terms of quality except they want to bury their heads in the sand. This is becoming apparent by the quality of his pronouncements on democratic rights, legitimacy, rule of law, the electoral process, federalism as a fiscal concept in theory and in practice in Nigeria , and in the documentation of his role in the democratic struggle against military dictatorship in Nigeria . Here is a leader who has paid his dues in terms of sacrifice, commitment and leadership and is yet not carried away by his immense achievements but is still searching for ways and means to lead in a better way and improve the lot of his nation and people . In this regard I wish him a very happy birthday and find him a worthwhile consolation even as I grieve, perhaps prematurely I hope , on the looming departure of the great Nelson Mandela in S Africa.