Tag: Britain

  • Britain elects youngest MP in 300 years

    Britain elects youngest MP in 300 years

    New MP Mhairi Black is now the youngest elected politician in Britain.

    The last holder of the record died 300 years ago.

    Christopher Monck, 2nd Duke of Albemarle, was 13 when he was elected as an MP in Devon in 1667.

    Speaking after her victory Ms Black said: “Whatever you’re views are on Scotland’s future, I will seek to represent you to the best of my ability.”

    She has unseated one of Labour’s big names, the former shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander, bringing an end to 70 years of Labour rule in the area.

    Newsbeat met Ms Black in Paisley before her election victory.

    There have been a lot of words used to describe her in the last few weeks: fresh-faced, impressive, articulate and a firebrand.

    She certainly seems to be all those things but she’s also a keen musician.

    Ms Black is also being seen as part of the political hurricane that seems to have swept through Scotland in the last few years.

    “The Scottish referendum changed everything for me. Once it came about, we thought this is a real chance to kind of change things,” she said.

  • ‘UK should move to inflation measure’

    ‘UK should move to inflation measure’

    Britain should switch to using a measure of consumer prices which better reflects housing costs as its main gauge of inflation, according to a review published on Thursday.

    The CPIH index, which was launched in 2013, includes more housing costs than the Consumer Price Index which is currently the basis of the Bank of England’s inflation target but does not include items such as mortgage payments.

    The CPIH and the CPI have been the same at the same rate since August.

    The review, carried out for the UK Statistics Authority, recommended that Britain’s statistics office “should move towards making CPIH its main measure of inflation.”

    The review also recommended ending the use of Britain’s Retail Price Index as a basis for contracts, including inflation-linked bonds issued by the government.

  • Britain’s top eight towns

    Virginia Water, Surrey

    Surrey is the most expensive county in which to buy a home, according to a survey by Zoopla of Britain’s top 10 most expensive towns. The county’s Virginia Water topped the list, with an average property value of £1,186,262 and an annual increase of 5.91 per cent.

    Cobham, Surrey

    Average property value: £1,003,400. Annual increase: 6.94%

    Cobham in Surrey takes the number two spot, and is home to the Chelsea Football Club training ground, with many of the team’s players living in large, luxury houses in the area.

    Keston, London

    Average property value: £947,955. Annual increase: 10.81 percent

    Keston sits on the border of London and Kent. Homes range from original 1920’s houses to ultra-modern detached houses with high-spec interior design and technology.

    Esher, Surrey

    Average property value: £931,669. Annual increase: 10.08%

    The historic town of Esher is surrounded by green space and boasts average property prices just under £1 million. Close proximity to the M25 makes this area popular with London commuters.

    Richmond, London

    Average property value: £906,770.  Annual increase: 12.47%

    Richmond is popular with Londoners seeking a peaceful haven away from the humdrum of the city. The town sits on a bend of the River Thames and boasts numerous parks and open spaces.

    Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire

    Average property value: £897,872. Annual increase: 4.79%

    Beaconsfield sits between London and Oxford, and is a quick 20-minute commute from London Marylebone. Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire. Average property value: £897,872. Annual increase: 0.47%. Chalfont St. Giles is an idyllic village in south-east Buckinghamshire, on the edge of the Chilterns., with popular schools and good transport links to London. Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire. Average property value: £815,222. Annual increase: 9.38%

  • Jonathan off to UK

    Jonathan off to UK

    President Goodluck Jonathan on Sunday afternoon left Abuja for a brief private visit to the United Kingdom.

    A statement by the Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Dr. Reuben Abati, said that the President was accompanied on the trip by some of his principal staff and personal aides.

    Jonathan is expected back in Abuja on Monday ahead of official engagements at the Presidential Villa on Tuesday including scheduled audiences with groups from Delta and Lagos States.

  • Britain needs Nigeria

    SIR: France and Britain colonised most countries in the world. For instance, at the apogee of her conquest spree, Britain reportedly controlled over one fifth of the world’s population. Among the major countries that Britain colonised include USA, India, Nigeria, Malaysia and South Africa. These countries currently boost of over 1.8 billion people.  France on her own colonised, among others, Cameroon, Senegal, Togo and Burkina Faso etc.

    The colonial masters notably, Britain, France, Portugal, Italy, Germany and Spain, had in an agreement in 1884 in a meeting called by German Rod Von Bismark shared Africa among themselves in response to a conflict between Britain and France about some parts of Nigeria. These two countries wanted to control the areas that have the largest population and resources in Africa. After the agreement, the two settled their differences and continued with their conquest.

    There are insinuations that France hates Nigeria. Some claimed that France is using her colonised countries to cause havoc in Nigeria. There are claims that France was among the greatest contributors to Biafra during the civil war. Also, Israel and the Vatican were believed to have strongly supported Biafra for different motives. For France, it was to divide Nigeria as that will be advantageous to France colonised countries in Africa. The Vatican motive was because of its notion that Christians were been killed.

    With the current insurgency in the North east, there are also reports that Israel and France are supporting it. Yet, the three countries bordering Borno state are Francophone countries. But if what the people are saying is true, why did Britain and USA maintain a neutral posture on this issue? MI 6 of Britain and CIA of US are among the most sophisticated secret services in the world and it will be wrong for the two powerful countries to pretend not to know what is happening? Ever since, Nigeria has been on Britain and US “special interest areas;” does it mean that they are no longer interested in Nigeria?

    It will be recalled that when there were problems in some Francophone countries like Mali, Burkina Faso, and CAR, it was France that settled it. Now the crisis in Nigeria – if any help is needed, Britain is expected to help even though France has reportedly sent troops to advice the Nigerian army. An international summit has been held in France and Niger republic – which is also a Francophone country, what is really happening? It will be cowardly of Britain and USA to forsake Nigeria and allow France to destroy it. If Britain is no longer interested in Nigeria, she should let us be.

     

    • Comrade Abdulbaqi Aliyu Jari

    Usmanu Danfodiyo University

    Sokoto State.

     

  • Britain, China, France join battle to rescue schoolgirls

    Britain, China, France join battle to rescue schoolgirls

    Britain, Franceand China have joined the battle to rescue the school girls abducted by the fundamentalist sect, Boko Haram.

    They are to deploy their Satellite Imaging capabilities and other advanced tracking technologies to assist Nigeria in rescuing the over 200 girls abducted in Chibok, Borno State.

    The President’s Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Dr. Reuben Abati, broke the news yesterday. He told State House correspondent that the President spoke with the British Prime Minister, Mr. David Cameron, on the phone yesterday after meeting with Premier Li Keqiang of China at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    The United States’ offer to help has also been accepted.

    U.S. President Barack Obama said in a report monitored on television: “Obviously it’s a heartbreaking situation. Outrageous situation. We’ve already sent in a team to Nigeria.  They’ve accepted our help through a combination of military, law enforcement, and other agencies which are going in, trying to identify where in fact these girls might be and provide them help.”

    Abati said: “In furtherance of efforts by the Federal Government to locate and rescue the girls abducted from the Government Girls Secondary School, Chibok, President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan Wednesday requested and received a commitment from Britain to deploy its intelligence gathering resources in support of Nigeria’s security agencies currently engaged in the search and rescue operation.”

    “President Jonathan, who spoke with the British Prime Minister, Mr. David Cameron on telephone after meeting with Premier Li Keqiang of China, who is on an official visit to Nigeria, asked and received a promise of the deployment of British Satellite Imaging capabilities and other advanced tracking technologies  in support of the ongoing effort.”

    “The President thanked Mr. Cameron,  the British Government  and people for their concern over the fate of the abducted girls and their willingness to provide concrete assistance to save the girls from the terrorists who  seized them from their school.”

    According to him, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will liaise with the British Government through its High Commission in Nigeria to work out practical details of the promised support and collaboration against terrorism.

    British Prime Minister David Cameron said: “I’m the father of two young daughters and my reaction is the same as every father or mother in this land or the world. This is an act of pure evil, it has united people across the planet to stand with Nigeria to help find these children and return them to their parents.”

    For the Chinese support, Abati said: “The Peoples’ Republic of China has also offered to assist in the effort to rescue the abducted girls. In talks with President Jonathan earlier today, Premier Li Keqiang promised that his country will make any useful information acquired by its satellites and intelligence services available to Nigeria’s security agencies.”

    “Mr. Keqiang assured the President that China will support Nigeria’s fight against terrorism in every possible way, including the training of military personnel for anti-insurgency operations.”

    Francejoined yesterday the United States and Britain in offering to send security service agents to Nigeria to help rescue the girls.

    With more than 4,000 troops operating between Mali to the west and Central African Republic to the east, Paris has a major interest in preventing Nigeria’s security situation from deteriorating, having previously voiced concerns that Boko Haram could spread further north into the Sahel.

    Having ousted al Qaeda-linked militants from Mali last year, France is planning to redeploy its forces across West Africa this summer to target Islamist groups taking advantage of porous borders between southern Libya, northern Chad and Niger.

    “The President has instructed … to put the (intelligence) services at the disposal of Nigeria and neighboring countries,” Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius told lawmakers.

    “This morning he asked us to contact the Nigerian president to tell him that a specialised unit with all the means we have in the region was at the disposal of Nigeria to help find and recover these young girls.”

    Boko Haram kidnapped more than 200 schoolgirls last month and has threatened to sell them into slavery, causing global outrage and bringing the Nigerian-based group firmly into the international spotlight.

    “In the face of such ignominy, France must react. This crime cannot be left unpunished,” Fabius said.

    A French diplomatic source said Paris had an existing military and intelligence cooperation with Nigeria, but that it was offering an additional “specialised team” from the external DGSE intelligence service.

    “The Nigerian authorities have to get back to us and tell us exactly what their needs are,” the source said, adding that Fabius was due to speak to his Nigerian counterpart later yesterday.

    President Francois Hollande, during a trip to Abuja in February, promised help to fight Boko Haram, saying Nigeria’s struggle was also that of France.

    “This may be the catalyst the international community needs to fight Boko Haram,” another diplomat said.

    In February 2013, the group kidnapped a French family of seven on holiday in northern Cameroon, releasing them months later.

    Hollande at the time denied a ransom had been paid, but a confidential Nigerian government report seen by Reuters said Boko Haram was given the equivalent of $3.15 million by French and Cameroonian negotiators.

    The kidnapping was one of a series of attacks on French targets in West Africa since France launched a military intervention in Mali to oust al Qaeda Islamists who had forged links with Boko Haram.

    Nigeria has complained that the Far North region of Cameroon is being used by Boko Haram militants to transport weapons and hide from a six-month military offensive against them. It has appealed to Cameroon to tighten border security.

    Officials in Niger, where France has based surveillance drones, have also voiced concern about infiltration by Boko Haram across the country’s southern border.

    “We’re already at the forefront of the fight against terrorists in the Sahel and with borders so easy to cross these groups are linked,” one of the diplomats said. “We have knowledge in neighboring countries that can help.”

    Pentagon: no military operations planned yet for Nigeria

    The U.S. will not launch any military operations in Nigeria, it was learnt yesterday.

    The Pentagon is sending fewer than 10 military troops as part of the U.S. effort to help find the girls.

    A Pentagon spokesman said officials have no plans now to launch any military operations.

    Pentagon spokesman Col. Steve Warren said the troops would be arriving in a few days as part of the larger U.S. assistance team to include State Department and Justice Department personnel. The military members will help with communications, logistics and intelligence planning.

    Warren said the U.S. was talking with Nigeria about information and intelligence sharing, but nothing had been decided.

    There are already about 70 military personnel in Nigeria, including 50 regularly assigned to the embassy, and 20 Marines have been there for training.

  • UK sees more scope for refinery closures

    Britain said there was scope for more United Kingdom (UK) refining capacity to close without undermining energy security but set up a new task force to help the struggling sector fend off overseas competition.

    The government’s long-awaited review of Britain’s refining and fuel imports sector comes a week after Murphy Oil said it could be forced to close its loss-making Milford Haven plant in Wales after talks with a potential buyer collapsed.

    In a 44-page report, the Department of Energy and Climate Change said environmental regulation along with the United States shale boom and the rise of new refiners in Asia made it harder for Britain’s seven refineries to compete.

    “Looking to the future, given current overcapacity in product supply there is scope for further rationalisation in the UK without impacting on supply security,” the review said.

    “Government recognises … the benefits of ensuring that refining and imports business sectors are able to operate successfully in the UK, whilst also recognising that ultimately market forces will decide what supply configuration prevails.”

    It announced the creation of a new joint government and industry Midstream Oil Task Force to look at ways of easing the regulatory burden and market distortions to help refiners meet global challenges that have seen their profits dwindle.

    European refiners have struggled with stagnant demand and increased overseas competition which has crushed margins and seen several plants closed or idled in recent years.

    Wednesday’s review into the sector was held after the Coryton plant in the east of England closed in 2012 following the collapse of its owner Petroplus.

     

     

     

     

    That followed the shuttering of the Teesside refinery in 2009, while last year, Grangemouth refinery in Scotland was brought to the brink of closure during a bitter industrial dispute between workers and its owner PetroIneos.

     

    Another 2 million barrels per day of capacity, more than 10 percent of Europe’s total, is expected to shut over the next five years, analysts at Vienna-based JBC Energy have said.

     

    The review said some of that capacity could be British.

     

    “Within the EU itself the UK refineries face particular challenges,” it said. “Some indications to government from industry are that UK refiners can face higher operating costs than equivalent refineries elsewhere in the EU, which has the potential to impact on competitiveness.”

    The challenges facing British refining are structural.

    Older refineries were originally geared to meet gasoline demand. As motorists have shifted to more efficient diesel in recent decades, the sector has been left with a surplus of gasoline and shortage of diesel made up by imports.

     

    The review found this trend was likely to continue, while overall demand for fuel products would fall as Britain moves towards lower carbon sources. Britain’s domestic refineries met 61 percent of overall demand for fuel products in 2012, it said.

     

    That level is healthy by the standards of the International Energy Agency (EIA) whose model for short term energy security, sees domestic cover of less than 55 percent as higher risk.

     

    Broken down into individual products, however, Britain imported a much higher 64 percent of its jet fuel in 2012.

     

    “A mix of domestic and global suppliers, brought about by having domestic refining capacity and a strong import infrastructure helps diversify risk and source of supply, helping ensure resilience to supply disruptions and maintaining security of supply,” the review said.

     

    The government will also establish an industry-owned and operated entity to manage Britain’s emergency oil stocks as it seeks to ensure the UK approach was “efficient and fair for obligated companies in the UK downstream sector”.

     

  • Britain to withdraw 50 Pounds from circulation

    Britain to withdraw 50 Pounds from circulation

    he Bank of England will be withdrawing the GBP50 from circulation, a circular from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) released yesterday said.

    CBN Acting Director, Trade and Exchange, J.O. Ajewole, who signed the circular addressed to all authorised dealers and the general public, said the Bank of England will be withdrawing the GBP50 bill with the portrait of Sir John Houblon from circulation. He said the bill will cease to be legal tender with effect from April 30.

    Ajewole advised authorised dealers in possession of the currency note and who wish to repatriate their stock to avail themselves of the services of Messrs Travelex Banknotes Ltd.

    Meanwhile, Britain had earlier in the week, said a new £1 coin, billed by the Royal Mint as the “most secure coin in the world” is to be introduced in 2017.

    Bloomberg said the move comes amid concerns about the 30-year old coin’s vulnerability to counterfeiting, with an estimated 45 million forgeries in circulation. The new coin is based on the design of the old three penny bit, a 12-sided coin in circulation between 1937 and 1971.

    A competition will be held to decide what image to put on the “tails” side of the coin. In his Budget statement to the Commons, Chancellor George Osborne said: “The prerequisite of sound money is a sound currency.”

    He said the £1 coin was one of the oldest coins in circulation and had become “increasingly vulnerable to forgery”. “One in 30 pound coins is counterfeit, and that costs businesses and the taxpayer millions each year.

    “So I can announce that we will move to a new, highly secure, £1 coin. It will take three years. Our new pound coin will blend the security features of the future with inspiration from our past. In honour of our Queen, the coin will take the shape of one of the first coins she appeared on – the three penny bit.

    The government said it would hold a detailed consultation on the impact of the change on businesses, which may face costs from having to change vending machines, supermarket trolleys and lockers at gyms and leisure centres. Some commentators have raised fears the new piece will not work smoothly in vending machines but the Royal Mint said the coin “will be expressly designed to fit existing mechanisms”. It said the move would increase public confidence in the UK’s currency and reduce costs for banks and other businesses.

  • Mark Carney:  A Canadian  who governs  Bank of England

    Mark Carney: A Canadian who governs Bank of England

    Ibrahim Apekhade Yusuf with agency reports recalls the intrigues that led to the Canadian-born Mark Carney as the popular but surprise choice for governor of Bank of England (BoE) in 2012

    BRITAIN is perhaps one of the countries that have had to outsource the job of the governor of their central banks to an outsider.

    Of course, the decision was taken as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, said was in the interest of the economy.

    When, for the first time, the position was advertised in early 2011, leading to a shortlist of five persons being interviewed, the advert called for a candidate who could: “successfully lead, influence and manage the change in the Bank’s responsibilities, inspiring confidence and credibility both within the Bank and throughout financial markets.

    “The successful candidate will have experience of working in, or with, a Central Bank or similar institution; or will have worked at the most senior level in a major bank or other financial institution. He or she will demonstrate strong leadership, management and policy skills; will have an advanced understanding of financial markets and good economic knowledge. He or she will be a strong communicator, have good interpersonal skills and will be a person of undisputed integrity and standing.”

     

    Headhunting abroad

    But what many Britons probably didn’t know at the time was that Osborne was carefully headhunting for Mark Carney, who was then serving as Governor of Central Bank of Canada.

    Osborne had been chasing Carney since early 2011, when he first floated the idea with the Canadian at a G20 summit in Mexico.

    He had asked him officially in mid August 2011. Carney said no. He still had 18 months left in the job. He didn’t want to do the eight-year term Osborne was stipulating. And that was before one even considered the notion of becoming the first non-UK Governor in the Bank of England’s 318-year history.

    But then, Osborne made another approach. This time around, he sold the prospect more aggressively. He said that if Carney insisted, he would reduce the term to five years after all, the main principle was to have a single term rather than opening up the messy question of reappointment as had happened after Sir Mervyn’s first term.

    This time around, Carney didn’t say no. Outlandish as the prospect of the appointment was, he was interested. Expectedly, Carney was reported to have made a surreptitious visit to London, in time to be interviewed by the Treasury/Bank of England panel and by Osborne himself.

    Carney, a Canadian, whose home town is Fort Smith, in the northwest territories, which is on the banks of the Slave River, has a population of 2,500, where he lived there till he was six years old, when the family moved to Edmonton.He attended Harvard University, where he was the reserve goalkeeper of the ice hockey team.

    His wife, Diana, whom he met at Oxford, has joint Canadian-British citizenship as do their four daughters.

    Critics say he wears his Oxford doctorate on his sleeve and is less than self-effacing. They speculate that his 13 years at Goldman Sachs, which took him to London, Tokyo, New York and Toronto, inspired his smart dress sense and air of authority. Yet, he is not brash, preferring to make few public comments and he rarely agrees to interviews.

    But he made the headlines in the financial press in 2011 when he came under attack from JP Morgan boss, Jamie Dimon, during a meeting of the then G20 Financial Stability Board, set up to tame the banks in the aftermath of the financial crisis.

     

    Vote of confidence for Carney

    Shortly after the choice of Carney was announced as head of the Old Lady, a euphemism for the Bank of England, many Brits and their counterparts in Canada expressed optimism over Carney’s choice.

    To Mr. David Cameron, Prime Minister of Britain, who described Carney as ‘exceptional’ choice, he said he was delighted that Mark Carney has accepted the chance to take the controls at Threadneedle Street.

    The PM said: “I am delighted that Mark Carney has accepted the job as the next Governor of the Bank of England. He takes up the role at an important time, as we put the Bank of England back at the heart of financial regulation, so that we do not repeat the mistakes of the past.

    “His distinguished record on economic policy, the high regard of his international peers and the leadership he has shown on the global economic crisis make him the exceptional person for this job. I very much look forward to working with him from next summer.”

    Carney isn’t the only central banker with a stint at Goldman Sachs on the CV either — Mario Draghi, head of the European Central, also spent several years there.

    And Draghi, of course, was Carney’s predecessor as head of the Financial Stability Board.

    Alistair Darling, the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, also added his voice to the chorus of people hailing the arrival of Mark Carney at the time.

    Speaking on Channel 4 News, Darling said: “I worked very closely with Mark Carney during the financial crisis…He stuck out from other central bankers in his understanding of the crisis and what needs to be done about it. We had to get the best candidate…this is a very good appointment.”

    David Blanchflower, the economist and former member of the Bank of England monetary policy committee, was also on the same page with Darling, saying, “You hire the best person with the best CV, and Carney’s that person.”

    Back in the UK, Liberal Democrat president, Tim Farron, warmly welcomed Carney’s appointment as his tweets suggested: “He is a great choice though. He is widely regarded as the best central bank governor in the world. Big coup for the government…He has a hard job ahead, but he’s very qualified and experienced.”

    The CBI equally welcomed the news that Mark Carney is the next Governor of the Bank of England.

    Katja Hall, CBI chief policy director, said: “His strong track record as the Canadian Central Bank Governor and extensive experience in international financial regulation mean that he is well positioned to guide Britain through challenging economic times. We look forward to working with and supporting him in his new role.”

    The former governor, Sir Mervyn King, who many pundits thought was actually rooting for Paul Tucker, his deputy, cheerfully accepted the decision to appoint Mark Carney.

    In a statement, King said: “He represents a new generation of leadership for the Bank of England, and is an outstanding choice to succeed me. Since Mark became Governor of the Bank of Canada, I have worked closely with him and admired his contributions to the world of central banking, in which he is widely respected.”

     

    Few dissenting voices

    The decision to appoint a Canadian to run the Bank of England was not without some hiccups, as some Brits literally played up the racist card.

    “Why not British? To whom does he owe his allegiance in his heart? Then again, many who sold us off, financially, economically and politically are supposed to be British. Mark Carney is a good choice. However, it is a sad indictment of the UK economics and finance professions that it could not conjure a suitable candidate. Very sad,” as one commentator summed it up.

    Meanwhile, Ann Pettifor didn’t jump on the Carney bandwagon, arguing that his appointment means “more of the same”: “There is nothing in his speeches that indicates that he will help give Britain’s real economy the protection it needs from its over-mighty and still very dangerous banking sector.

    “Nothing, in other words, that indicates the real economy the productive sector will be given priority over the city’s preference for reckless global speculation. Instead, like many others who adopt a “market-based” approach to regulation, Carney prefers to tinker retrospectively with the capital ratios of banks.”

    TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber at the time also reckoned that Carney has an almost impossible task, given the state of the UK economy.

    Barber said: “The Chancellor seems to have outsourced the job of getting the economy moving to the Bank of England but the Bank is now running out of monetary ammunition. Interest rates are about as low as they can get, and quantitative easing, while welcome as far as it goes, is not doing much to boost the real economy.”

    But Osborne replied his critics, saying Carney’s appointment is a sign of Britain’s confidence that we can go and get the best person for the job, across the globe.

    “Canada is a G7 country. It’s one of our allies…it’s hard to think of a closer ally than Canada,” Osborne stressed, adding matter-of-factly that Canada had a rather better crisis than the UK.

    As governor of the Bank of Canada, Carney is thought to have had a “good crisis”.

    Canadian banks weathered the storm better than most, seen in part due to the regulation of the Bank of Canada.

    Osborne adds that Mark Carney is the outstanding, preeminent central banker of his generation, and the right man to take control of the Bank.

    Osborne further revealed that Carney will serve for five years (not the eight years that were advertised), and is keen to appear before the Treasury Committee of the House of Parliament to discuss UK monetary policy, noting that Carney will bring ‘fresh perspective’ to the Bank of England, and help UK businesses and families through the tricky economic times ahead.

     

    How Canadians reacted

    Canadian’s are taking the loss of Mark Carney stoically, up to a point, anyway.

    Jonathan Rose, professor at the Department of Political Studies at Queen’s University at Kingston, Ontario, argued that Carney is taking a backward step: “So sorry to hear about Mark Carney’s demotion to the Bank of England.

    “Canada is losing a super star who could see across political lines for the good of Canada. I’m very sorry to see him go because of his integrity and leadership in the financial world,” said a Canadian.

    Another concurred: “I must say congratulations to Mr. Carney. I am sure that he will be fantastic in his new role. It is sad to see him leave, but love him or hate him; he has done an amazing job.”

     

    Benefits of Carney’s appointment

    Carney’s appointment did not cause any ructions in the financial markets. Amusingly, the pound did hit a two-and-a-half-week high against the Canadian dollar on the news.

  • Central banks in  other climes

    Central banks in other climes

    Ibrahim Apekhade Yusuf takes a look at how the apex bank in other countries work

    CENTRAL Banks operate in different parts of the globe, from the USA, Britain, Germany, Belgium, Canada, Portugal, to Middle East Asia and in Japan, China, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, to Brazil as well as the African continent.

    For sure, most of these countries’ central banks are saddled with the onerous responsibility of ensuring that the economy is on a clean bill of health in terms of monetary policy formulation, among other fiscal functions.

    But by far, the central banks in the USA and Britain remain, in the view of some economic and financial pundits, a model, in part, because of their socio-economic and technological advancement.

     

    The making of Bank of England

    From the middle of the 17th century, England, and London in particular, buzzed with ideas – indeed the era has been dubbed ‘the age of projects’ – but one which kept coming to the fore was the notion of a national bank.

    People sensed that the country was on the brink of a tremendous expansion of trade, but one vital element was lacking: what was needed was a bank or “fund of money” – more liquidity, in modern parlance – to drive the trade of the country. They looked with some envy across to the continent at the example of the Dutch who were then pre-eminent in Europe.

    Central to the success of the Dutch was the Amsterdam Wisselbank, which had been founded in 1609. It provided the motive power for the Dutch economy by lending to the City of Amsterdam, the State in the form of the Province of Holland and trade in the shape of the Dutch East India Company as well as being responsible for coinage and, of course, exchange. Much later, in 1683, it was empowered to lend to private customers. Payments over a certain amount had to pass through it and it therefore was convenient for the important finance houses to hold accounts with it. Thus, not only was it in a position to oversee the Dutch financial scene, it was also able to act as a stabilising influence on it.

    Dutch William had brought to his adopted country, England, an understandable desire to help his native country in its war against the French and this proved to be the catalyst necessary for the idea of a national bank to be accepted, albeit grudgingly by some.

    But it took a London-based Scots entrepreneur, William Paterson, to propose the scheme that eventually found favour: his first, proposed in 1691, had been rejected for several reasons. This was partly because, as he wrote in 1695, “Others said this project came from Holland and therefore would not hear of it, since we had too many Dutch things already.”

    Thus, the Bank of England can be said to have experienced some chequered existence which dates back to its foundation.

    But in 1997, the new government announced its intention to transfer full operational responsibility for monetary policy to the Bank of England. The Bank thus rejoined the ranks of the world’s “independent” central banks. However, debt management on behalf of the government was transferred to HM Treasury, and the Bank’s regulatory functions passes to a new Financial Services Authority.

    Subsequently, in 2013, the Financial Services Act 2012 established an independent Financial Policy Committee (FPC), a new prudential regulator as a subsidiary of the Bank, and created new responsibilities for the supervision of financial market infrastructure providers. The reforms came into force on 1st April 2013 when the Financial Services Authority ceased to exist.

    The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) at the Bank took responsibility for the prudential regulation and supervision of banks, building societies, credit unions, insurers and major investment firms. The PRA’s role was defined in terms of two statutory objectives to promote the safety and soundness of these firms and, specifically for insurers, to contribute to the securing of an appropriate degree of protection for policyholders.

    In promoting safety and soundness, the PRA focused primarily on the harm that firms could cause to the stability of the UK financial system. A stable financial system is one in which firms continue to provide critical financial services a precondition for a healthy and successful economy.

    The PRA worked alongside the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to create a “twin peaks” regulatory structure in the UK. The FCA was a separate institution and not part of the Bank of England. The FCA was responsible for promoting effective competition, ensuring that relevant markets function well, and for the conduct regulation of all financial services firms. This included acting to prevent market abuse and ensuring that consumers got a fair deal from financial firms. The FCA operated the prudential regulation of those financial services firms not supervised by the PRA, such as asset managers and independent financial advisers.

     

    The USA experience

    United States encompasses various bank regulations, from the early “wildcat” practices through the present Federal Reserve System.

    The Federal Reserve System (also known as the Federal Reserve, and informally as the Fed) is the central banking system of the United States. It was created on December 23, 1913, with the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, largely in response to a series of financial panics, particularly a severe panic in 1907.

    Over time, the roles and responsibilities of the Federal Reserve System have expanded and its structure has evolved.

    Events such as the Great Depression were major factors leading to changes in the system.

    The U.S. Congress established three key objectives for monetary policy in the Federal Reserve Act: Maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates. The first two objectives are sometimes referred to as the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate.

    Its duties have expanded over the years, and today, according to official Federal Reserve documentation, include conducting the nation’s monetary policy, supervising and regulating banking institutions, maintaining the stability of the financial system and providing financial services to depository institutions, the U.S. government, and foreign official institutions. The Fed also conducts research into the economy and releases numerous publications, such as the Beige Book.

    The Federal Reserve System’s structure is composed of the presidentially appointed Board of Governors (or Federal Reserve Board), the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks located in major cities throughout the nation, numerous privately owned U.S. member banks and various advisory councils. The FOMC is the committee responsible for setting monetary policy and consists of all seven members of the Board of Governors and the twelve regional bank presidents, though only five bank presidents vote at any given time (the president of the New York Fed and four others who rotate through one-year terms). The Federal Reserve System has both private and public components, and was designed to serve the interests of both the general public and private bankers. The result is a structure that is considered unique among central banks. It is also unusual in that an entity outside of the Central Bank, namely the United States Department of the Treasury, creates the currency used. According to the Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve System “is considered an independent Central Bank because its monetary policy decisions do not have to be approved by the president or anyone else in the executive or legislative branches of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms.”

    The authority of the Federal Reserve System is derived from statutes enacted by the U.S. Congress and the System is subject to congressional oversight. The members of the Board of Governors, including its chair and vice-chair, are chosen by the president and confirmed by the senate. The federal government sets the salaries of the board’s seven governors. Nationally chartered commercial banks are required to hold stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of their region; this entitles them to elect some of the members of the board of the regional Federal Reserve Bank. Thus the Federal Reserve System has both public and private aspects.

    The U.S. government receives all of the system’s annual profits, after a statutory dividend of 6% on member banks’ capital investment is paid, and an account surplus is maintained. In 2010, the Federal Reserve made a profit of $82 billion and transferred $79 billion to the U.S. Treasury. This was followed at the end of 2011 with a transfer of $77 billion in profits to the U.S. Treasury Department.

    The primary motivation for creating the Federal Reserve System was to address banking panics.

    Other purposes are stated in the Federal Reserve Act, such as “to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes.”