Tag: BUHARI

  • Fed govt honours Buhari at national memorial service

    Fed govt honours Buhari at national memorial service

    • …as Akume hails former president’s legacy of discipline, reform, patriotism

    The Federal Government on Sunday held a solemn National Memorial Church Service in honour of the late former President Muhammadu Buhari, with the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Senator George Akume, calling on Nigerians to reflect deeply on the legacies of the departed leader.

    Speaking at the service, which formed part of the official mourning activities, Akume described the former President as a disciplined and principled statesman who led with conviction, integrity, and an unwavering commitment to Nigeria’s unity and progress.

    This was contained in a statement issued by the Director of Information and Public Relation in the Office of the SGF, Segun Imohiosen.

    “Though not perfect, he fought a good fight, finished the race, and kept the faith. His legacy in national security, social protection, and institutional reforms – including the Petroleum Industry Act – will remain part of Nigeria’s development history”, Akume said.

    The SGF also applauded President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for approving the renaming of the University of Maiduguri to Muhammadu Buhari University, Maiduguri, in posthumous recognition of the former President’s contributions to national development.

    Read Also: Buhari family expresses gratitude to Tinubu, Nigerians, global leaders for outpouring of support

    “This gesture is not merely symbolic. It is about inspiring future generations to lead with courage and sacrifice, as President Buhari did,” Akume added.

    The National Memorial Service, held in Abuja, drew a cross-section of high-ranking dignitaries, including the representative of the President of the Senate, Deputy Senate Majority Whip Onyekachi Nwaebonyi, members of the National Assembly, ministers, top government officials, former Secretaries to the Government of the Federation, retired Permanent Secretaries, and other distinguished Nigerians.

    The event was part of a series of national honours being accorded to the late former President, who passed away on July 13, 2025, in London, and was laid to rest in Daura, Katsina State.

    Buhari, who served as Nigeria’s Head of State from 1983 to 1985 and as democratically elected President from 2015 to 2023, is remembered for his austere leadership style, anti-corruption stance, and push for institutional reforms.

    The memorial service capped a week of tributes and ceremonies across the country in honour of one of Nigeria’s most iconic political figures.

  • First Lady leads delegation on condolence visit to Buhari family in Daura

    First Lady leads delegation on condolence visit to Buhari family in Daura

    First Lady Oluremi Tinubu on Saturday paid a solemn condolence visit to the family of the late former President Muhammadu Buhari in Daura, Katsina State, where she led a delegation of spouses of public office holders to commiserate with the bereaved.

     In a post shared on her verified X handle, @SenRemiTinubu, the First Lady expressed heartfelt sympathy to the widow of the former President, Hajiya Aisha Buhari, and the entire Buhari family on behalf of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the women of Nigeria.

     “Today, I paid a condolence visit to Daura, Katsina State to commiserate with the beloved widow and family of our dearly departed former President, Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR,” she wrote.

    Read Also: Presidency slams ADC over Buhari’s burial remarks

     Senator Tinubu was accompanied by several high-profile women, including the wife of the Vice President, Hajiya Nana Shettima; wife of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hajiya Fatima Tajudeen Abbas; wife of the Deputy Senate President, Hajiya Laila Barau; wives of various state governors, ministers, service chiefs and other prominent women.

     Paying tribute to the late President, Senator Tinubu described Buhari as “not only a statesman but a symbol of integrity, discipline and devotion to Nigeria,” adding that “his life was marked by unwavering commitment to nation-building, public service and the welfare of the common man.”

     She further noted that the late leader “served our nation with honour both as a military leader and a democratically elected President.”

    First Lady of Nigeria Senator Oluremi Tinubu, Emir of Daura HRH Dr Umar Farouk Umar, Governor of Katsina State Dr Dikko Radda at the Emirs palace when the First Lady led Wives of Governors, Wives of Ministers, wives of the leadership of the National Assembly, wives of service Chiefs and others on a condolence visit to his palace on Saturday 19th July 2025
    First Lady of Nigeria Senator Oluremi Tinubu, Emir of Daura HRH Dr Umar Farouk Umar, Governor of Katsina State Dr Dikko Radda at the Emirs palace when the First Lady led Wives of Governors, Wives of Ministers, wives of the leadership of the National Assembly, wives of service Chiefs and others on a condolence visit to his palace on Saturday 19th July 2025

     The visit, which included prayers for the peaceful repose of the former President, was a moment of national reflection and unity, with the First Lady conveying the condolences of the Tinubu administration and the Nigerian womenfolk.

     “We pray that Almighty Allah (SWT) grants him Al-Jannah Firdaus,” she concluded in her message.

     Meanwhile, a statement issued by Senior Special Assistant to the First Lady on Media, Busola Kukoyi, said the delegation also visited the gravesite of the late President to offer brief prayers.

     From there, they proceeded to the residence of Alhaji Mamman Daura, a close ally and uncle of the late Buhari.

     At Mamman Daura’s residence, Senator Tinubu described the late President as “an accomplished man who made his family, town, state, and nation very proud.”

     In his remarks, Alhaji Daura expressed appreciation for the honour and solidarity shown by the First Lady and her delegation, acknowledging the respect accorded to the late leader.

     The visit culminated in a call at the palace of the Emir of Daura, His Royal Highness Alhaji Umar Farouk Umar.

     There, the First Lady offered her condolences to the emirate for the loss of one of its most illustrious sons.

     Responding, the Emir reaffirmed the loyalty of the Daura Emirate to the current administration, declaring that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu remains their preferred choice for the 2027 presidential election.

  • Presidency: ADC exploiting Buhari’s death for relevance

    Presidency: ADC exploiting Buhari’s death for relevance

    • Says party dancing on late president’s grave     
    • ‘Attack on state burial insensitive, unacceptable’

    The Presidency yesterday fired back at the African Democratic Congress (ADC) over its statement accusing President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration of exploiting the death of former President Muhammadu Buhari for political image laundering.

    It described the opposition party’s claims as “shameless” and “obnoxious.”

    In a statement signed by the Special Adviser to the President on Media and Public Communications, Mr. Sunday Dare, the Presidency accused the ADC and its leading figures of “disrespecting Buhari and dancing on his grave for relevance.”

    “Let it be said clearly: the ADC is the one exploiting Buhari’s death for political attention, not this government.

    “From Atiku and El-Rufai’s choreographed arrival in Daura — greeted with chants seeking to make political capital from the solemnity of the moment — to this disgraceful press statement, the ADC has shown itself to be utterly shameless,” Dare stated.

    The Presidency dismissed the ADC’s criticism as a “laughable tantrum” and part of a pattern of opportunistic outrage.

     “This is not the first time the ADC — in its pitiful, stuttering attempts at reinvention — has embarrassed itself with hollow, attention-seeking criticisms.

    “A party still grappling with an identity crisis presumes lecturing the President of the Federal Republic on governance, decorum and public accountability.

    “How utterly ridiculous,” the statement read.

     In contrast to the ADC’s allegations, the Presidency insisted that President Tinubu’s conduct during the mourning period was both dignified and befitting of the stature of the late former President.

     “The burial of former President Buhari was conducted with the complete honour befitting a leader of his stature.

    “That is why world leaders showed up, millions of Nigerians tuned in on television and across social media, and even ADC promoters were falling over themselves in Daura, prancing about the Buhari family compound like eager real estate agents scouting new territory,” Dare noted.

     Highlighting the administration’s focus and performance, the statement outlined what it described as President Tinubu’s growing list of achievements, including naira stabilisation, improved oil production, a 60% increase in FAAC allocations, and the restoration of electricity to long-neglected communities.

    Other milestones mentioned include the ongoing Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, the Ogbia-Nembe Road, and the new Sokoto-Badagry Road; student loans under the NELFUND scheme benefiting 400,000 young Nigerians; the creation of regional development commissions and the launch of Nigeria’s first-ever Consumer Credit Scheme.

    Read Also: FAAC shares highest allocation of N1.818tr in June

     “These are not press statements. These are results, tangible, measurable, and ongoing. That is leadership,” Dare declared.

     The Presidency described the ADC as a political “contraption” plagued by internal strife and legal woes, noting that the party has become consumed by “internal squabbles” and is “reduced to issuing these baseless attacks to cling to the fringes of relevance.”

     In a final swipe, Dare stated: “Let it be said without equivocation: Nigerians are not fooled. No press statement — however venomous — can erase the facts of progress.

    “President Tinubu honoured Buhari with dignity in death and continues to honour his legacy through hard work, not hollow words.”

     He urged Nigerians to ignore the “political noise” from what he called “an outfit gasping for attention,” affirming that President Tinubu remains focused on delivering the Renewed Hope Agenda.

     Also reacting in a separate statement on Friday, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) berated the ADC for accusing President Bola Tinubu-led administration of exploiting the state burial accorded the late President Muhammadu Buhari for political gains.

     APC National Publicity Secretary, Felix Morka, said the opposition party must have been shocked by the dignified state burial and the show of compassion and support for his bereaved family by the government and the people, describing the ADC’s criticism as “spooky, unconscionable,” and a reflection of its “duplicity and insensitivity.”

    Dismissing the criticism, Morka said: “ADC has showcased itself to be without any understanding of customary state practice, and lacking empathy and essential humanity.

    “It has cut its own portrait as a party of mindless political dregs, a dump of Nigeria’s internally displaced politicians ready to do or say anything in chase of attention but sinking itself deeper in quicksand of ignominy.

    “That the ADC is blowing up over the state burial of the late President only reflects the party’s duplicity and insensitivity.

    “What would the ADC have had President Tinubu do? Deny the late President Buhari the honour of a befitting state burial? Withhold empathy and support for the bereaved former first family?

    “As a party that can begrudge the dead, the ADC must surely disdain the living.

    “It is unacceptable for the ADC to politicise a solemn moment of national grief, more so as its senseless statement was issued during the week of national mourning for the late President.

    “The party’s reference to heartfelt gestures and activities of the government in honour of the late President as “exploitation” is beyond the pale.

    “It falls far outside the widest and wildest stretch of justifiable opposition politics.

    “Clearly, the party and its villainous leaders have allowed their humanity to be corroded by desperation for inordinate and self-serving power.”

    Eulogising Buhari, the ruling party said the late President lived a life of illustrious service to country as a soldier, military Head of State, a two-term democratically elected President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    The party stressed that Buhari was “just a human being, a father, survived by a loving but grieving family worthy of our collective empathy and support at this difficult time.

    “President Bola Tinubu showed compassion and a deep sense of loss of a friend, close political associate and predecessor.

    “He demonstrated patriotism and leadership by overseeing and participating in honouring the late president who gave so much to our dear nation.”

    The governing party then warned that Nigerians must remain wary of the ADC and its band of political marauders prowling for power with nothing to offer Nigerians except peddling falsehood and vilifying a President who is hard at work for the transformation and progress of our nation. 

    Shehu Sani slams critics of Tinubu’s Buhari tributes

    A former Kaduna Central Senator, Shehu Sani, has hit back at critics accusing President Bola Tinubu of exploiting the death of former President Muhammadu Buhari for political gain.

    In a post on his X handle on Saturday, Sani dismissed the backlash against Tinubu’s actions, arguing that the President had gone above and beyond to honour his late predecessor in ways even Buhari never did for others.

    “The President physically attended the burial of Buhari, met with his family, declared a public holiday, held a FEC meeting in his honour and renamed a university to immortalise him.

    “Something even the late President never did to others, and yet they said he is ‘exploiting the death of Buhari’. What would they have said if he had done none of the above? Politics is something else,” he stated.

    Sani’s remarks come amid a wave of political commentary following Tinubu’s official tributes and national gestures in the wake of Buhari’s passing.

    The former senator, known for his candid views on national issues, noted that the criticism of Tinubu was misplaced and reflective of deeper political sentiments rather than an objective assessment.

  • What’s next for North after Buhari?

    What’s next for North after Buhari?

    With the recent passing away of former President Muhammadu Buhari, a northern political icon, the region faces a power vacuum, shifting loyalties, and the search for new leadership rooted in both integrity and performance. Deputy Political Editor RAYMOND MORDI examines what this development portends politically, and how it would impact the next general election in 2027

    The end of an era

    When Muhammadu Buhari died on July 13, 2025, in London at the age of 82, it marked not just the passing of a man but the sunset of a political era. For millions of ordinary northerners—the Talakawa who live from hand to mouth—Buhari was more than Nigeria’s former president. He was a symbol. A living embodiment of discipline, piety, and incorruptibility.

    In their eyes, he was the leader who rose from Daura to the highest office in the land without compromising his values. To them, Buhari was Sai Baba—a phrase that wasn’t just chanted but deeply felt. His funeral procession in Katsina attracted mourners from across the North: farmers, traders, clerics, and students. For them, his death was personal.

    Thus, Buhari was more than a politician; he was an embodiment of a political mythos that resonated uniquely with the masses of the North. His death leaves a multidimensional vacuum unlikely to be filled in the near term.

    This is because of what he represented to the Talakawa. Buhari’s enduring appeal was not based on dazzling oratory or groundbreaking policies. It was about trust. The man who wore simple babanriga, kept his circle tight, and preached integrity was seen as one of them. His 2015 election win—the first time a sitting president was defeated in Nigeria—was carried on the shoulders of this trust.

    As a result, he commanded a cult-like mass following of about 12 million loyal voters; Buharists who saw him as Mai Gaskiya (the honest one) or the incorruptible saviour of the poor. Even after stepping down as president, his Daura and Kaduna homes became political pilgrimage sites. Knowing that his endorsement could influence votes in the North, coalition builder and former vice president Atiku Abubakar, ex-Kaduna State governor Nasir El-Rufai, and others sought his symbolic support.

    In all the political parties he was associated with since becoming a born-again democrat—including the All People’s Party (APP), the All Nigeria People’s Party (ANPP), the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), and the All Progressives Congress (APC)—Buhari consistently delivered bloc votes from the North.

    Saint or scapegoat?

    However, the late Muhammadu Buhari left behind a mixed legacy. While he launched high-profile anti-corruption probes and recovered stolen funds, critics accused his administration of selective justice.

    In security, despite military gains against Boko Haram insurgents in the Northeast, insecurity across the country has mutated. A new wave of banditry and kidnapping surged across the Northwest, North-Central, and beyond.

    Besides, Buhari presided over two recessions, high inflation, and a weakened naira—conditions that intensified rural hardship. His administration also faced criticism for suppressing dissent and imposing internet restrictions.

    Still, to many in the North, these faults were forgivable—because he didn’t enrich himself. He stood as proof that not all politicians are crooks.

    The succession struggle

    Without Buhari’s leadership, northern politics risks fragmentation. With his death, who now speaks for the Talakawa? Who channels the moral compass he once provided?

    Since nature abhors a vacuum, another leader may eventually emerge to galvanise the region politically. For now, however, the dilemma remains: Should the North rally around a singular moral successor, or build a collective ideological framework rooted in Buhari’s values?

    As various observers have noted, there can be no immediate successor in Buhari’s mould. Nevertheless, symbolic leadership still matters. A figure—or movement—rooted in simplicity, service, and sacrifice could command loyalty across ethnic and party lines.

    Yerima Shettima, President of the Arewa Youth Consultative Forum (AYCF), said the North is yearning for a qualified person to step into Buhari’s shoes. His words: “Our people look for integrity, not flashy politics. Whoever walks Buhari’s path, they will follow.”

    Read Also: Presidency slams ADC over Buhari’s burial remarks

    Dr. Amina Aliyu, a political historian at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State, said, “Buhari had his flaws, but he gave us a psychological reference point for leadership. The question now is whether anyone can inspire that kind of loyalty again.”

    Bashir Tofa Jr., son of the late 1993 National Republican Convention (NRC) presidential candidate, warned that Buhari’s legacy should not be hijacked by opportunists. “Northern integrity must remain a compass, not a campaign slogan,” he said.

    For Hauwa Ibrahim, an Abuja-based civil society activist and policy analyst, rhetoric is no longer enough. “Northern youth now want competence more than nostalgia. That’s the shift,” she said. The North, she argues, requires leaders capable of tackling urgent issues: youth unemployment, insecurity, education, and economic inclusion.

    Contenders for the mantle

    Among the names being floated as potential successors are Vice President Kashim Shettima, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, ex-governors Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso and Nasir El-Rufai.

    Others not in the national limelight—such as longtime Buhari loyalist and former Customs boss Hameed Ali, and Senator Abdulaziz Yar’Adua, younger brother of the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua—have also been mentioned.

    Yet, no figure matches Buhari’s (real or perceived) reputation for integrity. Buhari’s austere lifestyle and military background made him a moral archetype. By contrast, El-Rufai is mired in controversies; Atiku carries corruption perceptions; and Kwankwaso’s appeal remains largely confined to Kano.

    Shettima combines national exposure with northern roots. He is articulate, disciplined, and seen as loyal to Buhari’s ideals. But critics question his autonomy, especially amid rumours he may be replaced as Tinubu’s running mate in 2027.

    So, who will lead the North when the campaign for the 2027 general election begins?

    No second coming

    In the short term, no one will emerge as a “Buhari”—because his moral authority was built over decades of service and asceticism. He unified northern factions through coalition-building and commanded loyalty despite economic challenges.

    Chief Chekwas Okorie of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) believes Atiku Abubakar may play a major role in the next election. “As things stand, Atiku appears to be enjoying the backing of many of Buhari’s foot soldiers,” he said.

    Though Atiku may not enjoy the same cult following, Okorie believes he could influence northern sentiment. “Whether this would translate to victory remains to be seen,” he cautioned.

    Okorie further pointed out that Buhari-era appointees now aligned with the emerging African Democratic Congress (ADC)—where elements from the defunct CPC and defectors from the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) are teaming up to challenge the ruling party—have the means to pursue their ambitions. However, he warned that Atiku ‘cannot be another Buhari’.

    “Regarding the issue of corruption, you mentioned, elite concerns about corruption don’t always shape voter behaviour. Sadly, it’s often ethnic consciousness and grassroots loyalty that determine outcomes,” he said.

    Okorie concluded that a new set of leaders—with different characteristics—is likely to emerge. “Northerners tend to rally around those who have the wherewithal. They believe God chooses those He anoints.”

    The splintered house of Buhari

    Already, Buhari’s base has started splintering ahead of the next general election. Dr. Naseer Kura Ja’afaru, a former lecturer at the Federal College of Education (FCE), Kano, says northerners have mixed feelings about Buhari’s death, and that anyone trying to use his death to campaign during the next general election may not succeed.

    “On the one hand, he enjoyed immense goodwill. On the other hand, he lost it during his civilian presidency due to economic and security failures,” he said.

    Policies like border closure, escalating banditry, and cattle rustling alienated even his home base in Katsina. “You might recall a viral video showing youths in Katsina celebrating his death—an unsettling reflection of lost goodwill,” he noted.

    Dr. Ja’afaru, also a pro-democracy activist, believes no current northern leader can step into Buhari’s shoes. “He cannot have a successor because no one has demonstrated the capacity to do so.”

    Instead, he says future leaders will emerge circumstantially, depending on their ability to address public needs. He added, “Figures like Atiku, El-Rufai, and Kwankwaso carry too much baggage. They cannot embody the Buhari phenomenon.”

    ADC: from fringe to frontline

    The ADC, once a minor party, has emerged as a serious opposition contender. Its evolution into a political home for ex-CPC elements and Atiku-led PDP defectors has been rapid, if rocky.

    Positioning itself as the custodian of Buhari’s grassroots ideals, the ADC aims to consolidate northern votes. However, internal lawsuits and factional disputes threaten its unity. As ex-APC chieftain Salihu Lukman admits, the party still lacks a rallying figure of Buhari’s stature.

    Meanwhile, CPC veterans like Tanko Al-Makura, who remain within the APC, are expected to shore up support for Tinubu. However, analysts say they lack the mass appeal required to succeed in that role.

    Can the APC rebuild without its northern pillar?

    Buhari was the APC’s northern backbone. Without him, the party must reinvent itself or risk losing its base.

    Experts urge the APC to reframe the CPC legacy, not revive it. Emphasising core values like discipline, accountability, and grassroots engagement can help re-establish ideological footing.

    The party could elevate voices like Shettima and other reform-minded northern governors, and more importantly, reach out to the Talakawa through direct engagement: economic empowerment, security reform, and education.

    Institutionalising Buhari’s values through think tanks or foundations might also ground the party symbolically.

    For younger northerners, Buhari’s legacy is fading. Hafsat Sani, a 22-year-old Political Science student at the Bayero University Kano, summed it up: “Our parents loved Buhari because they believed in his honesty. However, we want leaders who can give us jobs, security, and hope. Honesty without performance is not enough.”

    Senior Special Assistant to the President on Research and Analytics, Gimba Kakanda, shares this view. The North, he says, is shifting from personality cults to issue-based politics. “Younger voters no longer seek redeemers. They want substance of vision. Politicians must approach them with humility, not messianic arrogance.”

    Conclusion: legacy for the strongest

    The 2027 election will likely feature fragmented northern votes, with both ADC and APC competing for the remnants of Buhari’s base.

    True successors will be those who tackle the North’s crises—insecurity, poverty, and educational decline—not those who merely invoke Buhari’s name.

    As one analyst put it: Buhari’s legacy now belongs to the strongest. But the arena is crowded, and the throne is empty.

  • Buhari bestrode this space

    Buhari bestrode this space

    Abun duniya abun banza ne.” (‘Worldly things are worthless things.’) This is how, in 2023, Nigeria’s late former President Muhammadu Buhari articulated one of the principles that guided his chequered life from his birth on 17 December, 1942 to his demise on 13 July, 2025. 

    A soldier’s soldier, he fought in the Nigerian civil war which broke out on 6 July, 1967 and ended on 15 January, 1970. A traumatic experience for the nation, Dr. Chris Ngige who served as the Minister of Labour and Employment for all of the two terms of the Muhammadu Buhari Presidency, said in this regard: “The man fought a civil war to keep Nigeria one.” Dr. Ngige, who fought on the Biafran side, also said: “He [Buhari] recounted the experience of how General Danjuma will always send him to where the war was thick knowing fully well that he would not say ‘No.’ And while other officers were taking leave to go home, he will be there for General Danjuma as their Commander.”

    Beyond the civil war, Buhari established his military bona fides when in 1983, as the General Officer Commanding (GOC), 3rd Amoured Brigade, he led his troops to repel Chadian invaders. To underscore the lesson Nigeria’s military set out to teach the intruders, he drove them back about 50 kilometers into Chad, by one account. Understandably, this created some international disquiet. 

    Moreover, in The Gambia, the opposition candidate, Adama Barrow, had defeated Yahyah Jammeh who had ruled the country for 22 years in the 1 December, 2016 presidential election, and the incumbent congratulated the president-elect. However, Yahyah Jammeh later retracted his earlier recognition of the results of the poll and insisted on staying on as President beyond the 19 January, 2017 handing over date. Nigeria spear-headed the international efforts to remove Yahyah Jammeh, and deployed jets and troops for the purpose. Seeing the credible threat of impeding military action, Yahya Jammeh agreed to leave office.

    It was reported that it was then-Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s private jet which was procured to ferry Jammeh and his family out of the country. In his remark to his presidential media team when they visited him in London where he was for medical attention, President Buhari said: “What we did in The Gambia has fetched us a lot of goodwill.”

    Buhari was Chairman of the Petroleum Trust Fund (PTF), Chairman of the Nigeria National Petroleum Company (NNPC), Minister of Petroleum Resources, Military Administrator, military Head of State and civilian President. As Dr. Ngige put it, Buhari “has worked and served Nigeria in areas where even the angel would be tempted to be corrupt.” Yet, he emerged from each office morally above board. His public service has also been signposted by key infrastructure such as the 2nd Niger Bridge, railways, the Lagos – Calabar coastal road, and the Badagry – Sokoto Road, just to mention a few.

    Ngige also noted: “His victory in 2015 over a sitting president, incumbent President Jonathan, is a good lesson for our democracy. … That victory deepened democracy in Nigeria. He showed that if you are in opposition and you preach well and you get your games correct, you can defeat an incumbent. … That victory was historic.” In fact, Buhari’s 2015 victory is the reference point and inspiration for the coalition which has declared its intention to remove President Tinubu from office in 2027.

    Before Buhari, “No work, no pay” was largely an ineffectual labour slogan in the Nigerian university system; but in 2022, it became a live and enforced International Labour Organisation (ILO) principle which got the stamp of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN). Moreover, the Buhari administration, in which the dynamic, sometimes, controversial Dr. Chris Ngige oversaw labour matters, democratised university academic staff unionism by registering the new Congress of University Academics (CONUA) in 2023 to expand the opportunities for choice of union membership by lecturers. As with the “No work, no pay” principle, this decision was predicated upon ILO guidelines and was sanctioned by an NICN judgement.

    Buhari knew how to seize the moment. He acknowledged that Chief MKO Abiola won the June 12, 1993 presidential election, which was annulled by the Ibrahim Babangida military regime, and had been a source of violence and unrelenting ethno-regional disaffection. Buhari also declared June 12 as Democracy Day and a national public holiday, and renamed the National Stadium, Abuja, the Moshood Abiola National Stadium, in honour of the democracy icon. For these actions, Buhari has been receiving annual adulations on June 12 as a champion of democracy. With his death now, these adulations would assume an endearing memorial significance.

    Read Also: FAAC shares highest allocation of N1.818tr in June

    Deservedly, the University of Maiduguri, unarguably the North-East’s intellectual powerhouse, has been renamed “Muhammadu Buhari University, Maiduguri.” This decision is in preference to the suggestion to rename the Federal University of Transportation University, Daura, Katsina State, after him. The decision has avoided holding him up as a local hero. Localising a national icon was one of the reasons for the fierce opposition to the renaming of the University of Lagos after MKO Abiola by the Goodluck Jonathan administration. 

    In the campaigns towards the 2015 presidential election, there were insensitive claims that, following the pattern of Northwest Nigerian Heads of Government dying in office, Buhari would die before the end of his first term. So, when he took ill in 2017 and had to be away from Nigeria for extended periods of time, some of his detractors expected that their morbid predictions would come true. In fact, Buhari himself was widely reported to have said: “I have never been so sick.” In spite of the severity of his condition, Buhari denied his detractors the medal of clairvoyance. Indeed, some of them who had been so categorical about his not returning from London or their much younger relatives died before his arrival.

    Amazingly, the frail Buhari who left Nigeria returned months later as a spritely, remarkably younger Buhari. And his traducers were so astounded that the only excuse they could give for what they thought was his metamorphosis was that the Buhari who left Nigeria for London had actually died and been buried. According to the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, Nnamdi Kanu, in a 3 December, 2018 YouTube video, “Jubril is an impostor. They brought him in to act and behave like the dead Buhari.” In one attempt to justify the ludicrous claim, attention was being drawn to the shape of the ears of the original Buhari and Jubril of Sudan.

    In a humorous reaction in the same video, President Buhari responded to a Nigerian at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Poland who sought to know whether he was the real Buhari: “A lot of people hoped that I died during my ill health. Some even reached out to the Vice-President to consider them to be his deputy because they assumed I was dead. That embarrassed him a lot and of course, he visited me when I was in London convalescing… It’s [the] real me [that’s standing before you]; I assure you.”

    Besides “Jubril of Sudan,” there are other expressions by and about Buhari which would serve as his memorial. On Tuesday 10 May, 2016, without knowing that the comment could be picked up by others, then-British Prime Minister David Cameron told Queen Elizabeth II that Nigeria was “a fantastically corrupt” country. Asked by a journalist whether he was going to demand an apology for the undiplomatic put down from Cameron, Buhari said wittily: “I’m not going to demand any apology from anybody. What I’m demanding is the return of assets [stolen from Nigeria and kept in Britain] … What would I do with apology? I need something tangible.”

    Probably the most popular and most enduring of President Buhari’s soundbites related to his wife’s politically vocal nature. On a trip to Germany, asked what her political affiliation was, the President said: “I don’t know which party my wife belongs to, but she belongs to my kitchen, and my living room, and the other room.” “The other room” has since become a folk euphemism in Nigeria.

    When his time was ripe, since, as the Qur’an says, “Every soul shall taste of death,” President Buhari left Nigeria for the United Kingdom on 27 February, 2025, and breathed his last there on 13 July, 2025. Delivering his funeral oration at a special, expanded meeting of the Federal Executive Council on 17 July, 2025, President Tinubu, quite rightly, said: “President Buhari was not a perfect man – no leader is – but he was, in every sense of the word, a good man, a decent man, an honourable man. His record will be debated, as all legacies are, but the character he brought to public life, the moral force he carried, the incorruptible standard he represented, will not be forgotten. His was a life lived in full service to Nigeria, and in fidelity to God.”

    President Buhari’s imperfections served as a canvass which showed so clearly how so much more imperfect some others around him were. Nothing revealed this more clearly than the criticism that he gave those who worked with him unrestrained freedom of action. That some of these aides performed below par or overreached themselves or swarm in impropriety was a betrayal not just of the President or the nation, but of nature itself which has made us to come to expect that growing up was morally and ethically refining or that grown-ups didn’t need bottle-feeding or micro-managing.

    President Buhari’s death creates an opportunity for us as a nation to begin to re-examine our democratically-elected Presidents, especially, of the Nigerian Fourth Republic, and from an amalgam of their relative positive qualities, set a standard for the ideal future Nigerian president. Noteworthy in this regard are President Olusegun Obasanjo’s reputation as a hardworking leader and President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua’s exquisite conscience which made him acknowledge that there were legitimate ethical questions to be raised about the 2007 elections that brought him to office, complemented by the willingness to correct the identified moral challenges in subsequent elections.

    Also of key importance are President Goodluck Jonathan’s uncanny respect for the will of the electorate and his aversion to election-related bloodshed; President Buhari’s transparent honesty, love for the common people and the desire to bring out, unforced, the best in each of his appointees to public office; and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s methodical, sharply-focussed, long-term preparation for office, the courage to take necessary, even if unpopular, decisions, and his uncommon capacity for the consensual deployment of presidential powers.

    As a fitting closing testimony to Nigeria’s late President Muhammadu Buhari, President Tinubu said: “Mai Gaskiya, The People’s General, the Farmer President – your duty is done.”

  • President Muhammadu Buhari in retrospect

    President Muhammadu Buhari in retrospect

    Femi, you are an uncommon columnist with irreproachable integrity.

    You are your own man … that’s what your writings say, loud and clear – Akogun Tola Adeniyi, on my soon to be out Book: Simply a Citizen Journalist.

    Everything considered, President Buhari was a great Nigerian leader, indeed, a titan.

    As former President Ibrahim Babangida did not fail to mention  in his tribute to him at his passing, President Buhari was:”quiet yet resolute, principled yet humble, deeply patriotic, and fiercely loyal to Nigeria,” to which, according to IBB,”he gave his best”.

    I wish to commiserate with the people of Katsina state, the entire peoples of Nigeria, especially the immediate family of the late President and Commander- in – Chief of the Armed Forces of Nigeria, President Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR.

    May the Almighty God grant him eternal rest.

    As a chronicler of events, and a trained historian to boot, I wrote copiously about President Buhari’s persona and government.

    I, therefore, not unexpectedly, had a torrid time trying to select three from my over fifty articles which dealt, in great detail, with his administration between 2015 and 2023.

    I will only plead with my editor to please grant me some extended space to put these 3 articles out for the reading public.

    In: ‘Is President Buhari Just Plain Unconcerned Whatever Happens to Nigeria or Nigerians’, of 3 January, 2021,  I wrote as follows:

    ” So much is wrong with Nigeria that I personally no longer  know  what to think or believe. Indeed, I no longer know what to write, having severally repeated myself on issues which, not only I, but even well known friends of President Buhari, the likes of the Emir of Katsina and His Eminence, the Sultan, have had cause to  speak about of recent concerning where the President has landed  Nigeria.

    Even as every organisation with the minutest connection to the North – Coalition of Northern Groups, the Arewa Youth Consultative Forum, NEF, ACF etc –  now equates the minutest criticism  of the Buhari government to regime change,  it cannot but be heartwarming that the usually forthright NEF spokesperson,  Dr. Hakeem Baba-Ahmed, could still permit himself to say the following: “There are many grounds to question the competence and sensitivity of President Buhari’s administration. Even his most ardent supporters, if he has any, that is, will wish he has shown greater respect for inclusion and accountability of those he chooses to trust with power. The nation is paying a heavy price for mediocrity and ineffectiveness in key areas of decision-making under President Buhari”.

    With truisms like this, one would not mind  putting  up with the obsequiousness of Presidential spokespersons, and those other hangers on who are now so dim- witted they cannot offer the President some honest viewpoints even as Nigeria regresses daily under his watch.

    Read Also: FAAC shares highest allocation of N1.818tr in June

    I am presently so completely tanked out having written  a whole year too early, on the topic: Annus

    Horribilis on 29 December, 2019 which would have been most appropriate today, pandemic aside.

    Readers will, therefore, please forgive me as I go back all the way to my archives to fetch an article that not only encapsulates the times, but generated so much furore, and trended on social media for well over two weeks.

    Published, 15 December, 2019, ‘What Is Happening Mr President’, was also deliberately misinterpreted by those who either are mischief makers or who, because they do not understand the English language, permitted themselves to be easily lured into thinking that I was on an errand for a particular politician who they say had an axe to grind with the President. 

    I had  no alternative than to urge them to go and read my column from inception which, incidentally, went back to COMET, and so debuted long before The Nation.

    That article will now be edited for space constraint.

    Happy reading.

    For those who may not know, I have more than established my bona fides as a supporter of President Muhammadu Buhari. When he was not anywhere sure he would emerge the APC Presidential candidate for 2015, I  wrote about  him as follows: “Nigeria, in its current dire straits, needs Buhari more than he needs Nigeria”.

    This was repeated in a book by the late Prof Tam David West when he wrote: “Buhari: The Politics Of Age, October 14, 2014:”Nigeria, in its current dire straits needs Buhari more than he needs Nigeria.” -Femi Orebe,“The Nation On Sunday”, September 28, 2014 Page 18”.

    I write  that to show  not just  where I stand on the Nigerian political spectrum, but to let President Buhari  himself know that in asking what are bound to be absolutely uncomfortable questions, they are not coming from enemy territory, but from the tortured  soul of a supporter of his, who has been at the receiving end of those Nigerians who claim I was one of those who sold them ‘a pig in a poke and  the most tribalistic Nigerian President ever’.

    In fairness to the critics, I have  often personally wondered  as to how the President still manages to sleep, if he is able to, after he must have taken a hard look at how the North has come to so completely dominate the Nigerian public space under his watch  to the extent that one would be right to say Nigeria  is under a Northern stranglehold.

    Worse really, is the fact that this seeming internal colonialism shows no signs of remission as various stratagems are still ongoing; examples being the Water Bill currently at the National Assembly, as well as  the case of the Federal Commission on Nomadic Education, which though has failed, maximally  in its core function, given the number of out- of -school children in the North, but is now doing everything  to insinuate itself into  the contentious grazing reserves matter which is aimed at sexing up the country’s demographics in favour of the Fulani.

    As I wrote earlier, these views of your government are now being shared by core Northerners.

    But like  one time House of Reps member, Dr Junaid Mohammed,  U S- based, Farooq A. Kperogi, has  rightly  described your government as ‘Government Of Buhari’s Family, By His Family, And For His Family’.

    He wrote more: “Before he was sworn in as President in May 2015, Muhammadu Buhari, without prompting from anybody, publicly told his immediate and extended family members to stand back from his incoming government. He even warned that any family member who used his name to peddle influence would face dire consequences”. ”I was so impressed by this declaration that in my May 16, 2015 column titled “6 Reasons Why Incoming Buhari Government Fills Me with Hope,” I isolated it as one of the six reasons I thought Buhari’s administration would “represent a qualitative departure from the legalised banditry that has passed for governance in Nigeria for so long.” Specifically, he continued : “Buhari’s symbolic but nonetheless significant gestures like telling family members to steer clear of his government and telling aides to obey traffic laws inspire me. I remember the President saying all that and I was beside myself with joy. You would, indeed, have ridden a horse in my belly. But all those soon  dramatically changed that the First Lady had to cry out, protesting what she called a hijack of your government. I thought that was impossible”.

    The rout is complete.

     I am aware that the First Lady  had once observed that you do not know many of  those working in your government,  but that notwithstanding, I think it is necessary I remind  your Excellency, that Nigeria presently has no less than 250 ethnic groups’, divided into  6 geo – political zones . Under no circumstances should these things happen as they are  totally unconscionable and a matter of great discomfort  for those of us still supporting you in this part of the country. It is extremely nauseating  that a part can so horribly dominate the rest when those others are no slaves.

    No genuine supporter of yours in the South can be happy, or roll out the drums for this state of affairs  as they are  not only unthinkable, but totally ungodly. It is  even worse, given Nigeria’s current realities of mass poverty and unremitting insecurity.

    Unfortunately, Nigerians are not hearing a word from APC leaders in other parts of the country who toiled with you in forming the party on which  you rode to power, thus heedlessly, and selfishly, disappointing those they led to  the party.

    Whatever you can do to correct these ungodly acts will be of great help, not only to your party, as it will  molify the people somewhat,  and most probably, secure a positive legacy for you.

    Otherwise all  your  contributions to Nigeria, at this extremely difficult time, may come to naught, which I pray, God forbid”.

    The second selected article is:’President Buhari’s 2nd Term: Where WillI The Votes Come From’ dated  17 September, 2017. 

    It reads:”When on Sunday, 17 September, 2017 I wrote the article below, my intention was to rouse President Mohammadu Buhari, free him from the suffocating grip of a mafia whose mindset is cast in the 17th century, and wake him up to the reality that he is President of  a multi- ethnic, multi-religious and, a culturally diverse country of  over 200 million people. That those hopes have largely been dashed became  obvious to me after the totally unconscionable appointment of a Northerner to replace the former Yoruba Director – General of the National Intelligence Agency, thus completing the banality of Northerners’ complete control of the Nigerian security apparatti, the effect  of which we now see in the shambolic way the security agencies are treating the murderous Fulani herdsmen.

    If the article was advisory then, things have so degenerated now that if APC is to have any hope of victory in 2019 , the Buhari government must be rescued from that un-elected cabal.

    “My prayer had always been that God will restore President Muhammadu Buhari to perfect health, to  such an extent his health will not even be an issue in the 2019 elections.

    That prayer has largely been answered in the affirmative.The question to now  ask is: where will the votes come from to earn him a second term? To answer that question, let us examine the man and his government.

    Relying exclusively on what I knew of contestant Muhammadu Buhari up until 2014/15, and seeing how then President Goodluck Jonathan had firmly enthroned systemic corruption in the country, I wrote  shortly before the APC primaries of December, 2015, that Nigeria needed Buhari more than he needed her.

     But can I, in all honesty, say that today? 

    President Buhari showed very early in his administration that he was not going to be his own man when, in what many saw as a dig at Ashiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, a man who gave a leg and an arm for his victory, he said he was for nobody, but for all, as if  anybody said  he should be beholden to Tinubu.

    By the time he ended his ‘search’ for his ministers – some 6 months after – his relations, and assorted Hausa/ Fulani/Kanuris, to the near  total exclusion of Nigerians from other ethnic groups, have taken over the government. That the country’s entire security architecture is in the hands of Northerners must have been the icing on the cake.

    If that was resented in the Southwest which had been crucial to his election, what about the North Central geopolitical zone which the progressives won for the very first time ever?

    Political pragmatism should have informed the President to encourage the party to cede the senate Presidency to the nPDP after CPC and APC had taken the Presidency and the Vice presidency, respectively. That is how, very easily, the extremely polarising executive –legislative face off  which has since haunted the party, and the government, could have been avoided. The President did no such thing. Today, the National Assembly is controlled by the ruling party only in name.

    How then have these avoidable missteps affected President Buhari in the performance of his duties, and how, in turn, will they affect election 2019?

    The President has recorded considerable achievement in the discharge of his promises to the electorate on anti corruption and the fight against the all pervading insecurity he inherited from President Jonathan, even though some critical, but avoidable, challenges remain. While inter agency squabbles have significantly hampered the anti corruption war, despite EFCC’s  successes, the judiciary has been most unhelpful, with some judges, despite ACJA, still granting unreasonably long adjournments, and giving rulings that show they don’t care a hoot if Nigeria goes to the dogs.

    The judiciary, especially some judges and a few, quite identifiable members of the senior bar, have constituted themselves into a bulwark of support for corruption’s ferocious fight back.

    Similar mitigating challenges also trail the war against insecurity, especially Boko Haram which remains not only a potent enemy of state, but one on which so much money is being  wasted.

    Kidnappings, armed robberies, serial killings etc continue to  be the bane of every Nigerian citizen. Cost of living is high just as youth employment gnaws at the heart of most parents.”

    All these should tell President Buhari he has his job cut out for him from now on.

    Nor can a resurgent PDP, which is already stoking the embers of citizen’s malcontent, be taken for granted. In this respect, President Buhari must realise that Nigerians have very short memories. Yes, PDP is a party of buccaneers, yes they stole the country blind, yes, they literally turned the country into Somali and Southern Sudan combined, but hey, if Nigerians are still this hungry by 2019, the electorate will not remember that it was President Jonathan who turned the CBN to an Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) and got, on his instructions, a 2.1Billion dollars earmarked for the military completely incinerated by his acolytes.

    How has the Buhari government fared on such key subjects as Education, top posts of which are also dominated by the North, Healthcare delivery, Housing, road infrastructure etc? Why so many strike in our institutions of higher learning and how come labour has become so unduly restive?” 

    When the above was written, the  Benue genocide and the Taraba bloodletting were  still aeons away. Police men have not yet become game for Fulani herdsmen, with our security agencies looking askance. An arrogant, Emirs -backing, miyetti Allah, confident the government would never lift a finger to check its murderous excesses, was still talking largely in whispers. Not now, when they are in the open, killing and maiming; burning villages and farmsteads, and telling state governments what laws they can, and cannot enact.

    Happily, President Buhari still has  some time, though not much, on his hands, to rouse himself, re brand, restrategise, and begin to run an inclusive government. He must ensure that these murderous killers are brought to justice, as killers must  get their comeuppance; albeit, through the  due process of law.

    The President must wean himself off his excessive ethnicity. It is as unjust, as it is unexplainable in a multi-ethnic society. He must see every part of the country, especially the thoroughly shortchanged Southeast, as deserving of fairness and equity”.

    Finally, the third article, captioned as ‘When Is a Failed State’ of 6 August, 2021.

    I wrote therein as follows:”The more I look at Nigeria, the more agonised I become. This gets worse when I look at her trajectory since 2015, a year Nigerians had believed would be the very beginning of our redemption from PDP’s 16 -year stranglehold – 1999 – 2015. How wrong this has proved?

    The Economist of London writes:”Nigeria now confronts six or more internal insurrections. Her inability to provide peace and stability to its citizenry has tipped the hitherto, very weak state, into failure”.

    The question that then arises is: were Nigerians wrong in 2015 when, on the election of President Muhammadu Buhari, they started to smell redemption from the quagmire which 16 years of the PDP threw them into?

    My answer would, undoutedly,  be that Nigerians had more than enough reasons to believe that given President Buhari’s incandescent personal integrity, his experience in government and the many years he tried to be voted president, Nigerians were not wrong.

    Yet, Nigeria is where it is today. 

    Why?

    The Economist touched on this very germane question when it wrote further: “A country plagued by acute corruption problems, and with the unremitted crude oil revenue scandal of 2014 still fresh in the people’s minds, many were eager for a change; the type never seen before. Here, after all, was a retired army general, one already experienced in governance, with a great strength of will, and supremely considered tough enough to take on the nation’s cabal of hardened criminals. He, indeed, had promised, during the campaigns, to appoint only technocrats to head the country’s departments and to see off the Boko Haram insurgency. For a nation lacking basic amenities such as power,  despite its huge energy resources, the choice could, in fact, not have been easier. To most Nigerians, therefore,  General  Buhari, with all his integrity was the man for the moment”.

    Nor was the Economist alone, as yours truly was sanguine enough to have earlier written, on these pages, that Nigeria needed candidate Buhari more than the obverse.

    As the Economist did not fail to mention, disappointment was not long in coming, adding that in “less than a year of his assumption of office, the economy which had  grown at an average rate of 7%  between 2011-2014, had plummeted into recession. He had taken 6 months to appoint a cabinet and far more to appoint heads of agencies and boards, just as he increased import duties on the most basic of commodities in a bid to raise government revenue”.

    Worse, however, was the unbelievable insularity that underpinned his appointments. His cabinet was presumably inferior, in the decision making process, to the  more powerful, thoroughly shadowy kitchen cabinet of alleged blood relations, and those loyal  friends and allies of his long political odyssey, irrespective of their individual competences, beyond hegemonic ties. In consequence of all these, the Economist went on, “the country’s currency lost 70% of its value, unemployment rose from 6.5 to 26%, commodity prices tripled across many quarters and the state-regulated premium motor spirit prices were hiked by 67%. Today the Naira exchanges for more than 500 to one dollar”.

    Nigerians, out of respect for  the president, could still have borne their increasing poverty with equanimity. After all,  Nigeria has been categorised as the poverty capital of the world. But the indescribable insecurity  changed all that.

    In every part of the country, you are  no longer  safe on farms, highways, forests, schools, but worst of  all, in your own homes, from where you or your children can be summarily  plucked, with the government hardly batting an eyelid.

     Even when hordes of literal sucklings, pupils aged below 10 years, were kidnapped from their schools in the North , the government still managed to feign complete ignorance leaving the parents to face the ordeal.

    Today in Kaduna, Zamfara and Niger states, like any state at all, I am not sure any parent sending a child to school in the morning can say with any certainty that the child would return home. Between Boko Haram and bandits, schools have truly become ‘haram’.

    While the meddlesome Sheik Gumi, and his entourage could make tourist -like soree’s to bandits’ hideouts,  kidnapped children could still spend days upon days – one was 55 days – and men and women of our security forces would be forbidden from attacking the rogue, non state actors. It has, in fact, been reported that bandits, some of who recently  shot down a fighter jet, do have more sophisticated weapons than our security forces. Is the Economist not correct about our status as a failed state when  bandits could shoot down a fighter jet, and hold their kidnapped victims for as long as they choose? What exactly stops the government from declaring a fullscale war on them or, j in the alternative, seek external help? Is it correct to assert that religion and ethnic consaingunity are behind government’s failure to tame insecurity?

    There is also the question of the ease with which Fulani herdsmen literally live above the law, maiming, killing and kidnapping at will.

    Let us now end this article with the views of Dr Hakeem Baba – Ahmed, the NEF spokesperson, as he expressed them in an expansive interview with The Nation newspaper of Saturday, 31 July, 2021.

    Question: “On a final note, despite all the criticism, are there any positives you see in six years of the Buhari administration?

    Dr Baba- Hamed: “No! And I say that with a lot of regret. If there were, I would  say so. I was among the tiny group of people who contributed to putting this man in power, and there were huge expectations.We genuinely believed that President Buhari would  fix  security, the economy and tackle corruption; that he would give this country a new lease of life, show leadership and be different from Jonathan’s PDP administration”.

    “We had very high hopes, particularly those of us in the North who were at the receiving end of Boko Haram insurgency at that time.We didn’t see any of those things. We have seen decline in the quality of leadership, we have seen decline in security, we have seen decline in the economy. If today I tell you, there are families in the northern part of the country in the rural North, which grows its own food and eat it, families that eat one meal a day, people will find that unbelievable, but it is the truth. If I tell you that there are women in some villages in parts of the North who sleep on trees at night because they are afraid that bandits will come in the night to take them away, people may not find that believable, it is the truth. If I tell you children leave home for  school and their parents are not sure whether they will come back and that a large number of parents are removing their children from school in the north which desperately needs children, particularly the girl child, to stay in school, some people will say that is not true. But, it is the truth.That is the reality we live in. If I tell you there are communities in the South that Northerners cannot go to, some  people will say it is not true, but the reality is that it is true. That is what the six years of Buhari administration has done to Nigeria”.

    “It gives no pleasure, believe me honestly, I wish  he  has done the opposite, so that, I can be proud and say thank God, all the efforts we had put in 2003, 2004, 2005 has borne fruits, that we have shown that we can actually produce a good leader that would make a difference, but he has failed to do this and my major concern now is that, I am worried that  the same administration is working to put another administration in power and the PDP is not any better. PDP just wants to wrestle power from President Buhari and do exactly what Buhari is doing, that is the tragedy for this country”.

    There you have it dear readers. But unlike Dr Baba – Hamed, do not judge President Buhari.

    Allow History to do that.

    Erratum

    Dr John Kayode Fayemi’s 60th birthday was on February 9, 1965.

    Apologies for wrong date quoted in last week article.

  • Buhari: Remember six feet

    Buhari: Remember six feet

    Nigeria would be great again the day our leaders start to remember that they don’t have death in their pocket

    Even as an unrepentant critic of the Muhammadu Buhari administration, I concede that the man was great in death. As a journalist, why I am a natural critic of Buhari as president is not far-fetched.   At his first coming as military head of state in December 1983, the then General Buhari, among other things, promulgated the infamous Decree Four that was for all intents and purposes, a press gag law. The problem with that decree was that it was not after the truth but more concerned about not embarrassing public officials. No true journalist would like a regime that came up with such a draconian idea.

    That was why, when, during the Sallah of 2014 (I think) when we were catching fun in the house of a commissioner-friend in Lagos State, we discussed a series of issues over exotic wine and sumptuous meal. The 2015 elections were around the corner then. We were enjoying ourselves when a former commissioner in the state literally fouled the air, as it were, when he touted Buhari as a possible presidential candidate. Mind you, over 95 percent of the about 12 of us in the sitting room are journalists. Our reaction was spontaneous NO WAY. Thank God, we didn’t say that would only happen over our dead body, dejected as we were that such a satanic idea could have come from a senior colleague. Otherwise, we would have been forced to swallow our words when Buhari later became president.

    We debated the matter. In the end, the senior colleague asked one simple question: what did we think was Nigeria’s worst challenge then? Of course that was a simple question that even a pupil in kindergarten could answer. Indeed, it was not a matter of what we thought, but a matter of what was the main problem. We all answered: corruption. Then the next logical question: who did we think could solve the problem? Was it Atiku Abubakar? We were all silent because none of us believed Atiku had the guts to fight corruption. At the end of the day, we all grudgingly agreed that it was Buhari, given his stance against corruption when he was military head of state between December 1983 and August 1985.

    At that point, it became clear that Buhari was going to be the candidate of the three political parties that eventually formed the All Progressives Congress (APC) –the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), and the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP).

    The 2015 general election finally came and Buhari won, defeating the incumbent President Goodluck Jonathan in the first such election where an incumbent president would be defeated in the country.

    He was sworn in and the rest is history.

    A lot has been said about his performance in office, so I wouldn’t want to dwell much on that. Rather, I want to make this a somewhat philosophical piece for our present leaders, particularly those of them who act and talk as if they already have death in their pocket.

    Read Also: Presidency slams ADC over Buhari’s burial remarks

    Nonetheless, I said that Buhari was an analogue president who came in a digital age. I said that much while he was president, so, if I say it now, I cannot be accused of speaking evil about the dead. Whatever that is supposed to mean even? For me, that would be one of Buhari’s biggest mistakes. That was why, right under his nose, one of his top officials (or were they many?) could have owned 753 duplexes in the same Abuja that he was living without him knowing. A digital president would have got wind of that. The sad part of it was that when some of us called his attention to some of the barefaced corruption and cluelessness that defined his presidency, Buhari never listened. Our voices were like that of John the Baptist in the wilderness. As a matter of fact, I was so frustrated at some point that I was always saying that his top officials must have got the original of whatever they used to cast a spell on him because that was the only thing that would have made a president so aloof in the circumstance.

    As I said, I am not writing to praise Buhari or to bury him. I leave the question of whether he did well or not to posterity. This piece is more of one for introspection on the part of Nigeria’s current leaders.

    I watched a substantial part of the man’s burial live on television on Tuesday. I was fascinated by what I saw, particularly the place called his house where his remains were eventually buried. It was too modest for comfort, given the status of the man Muhammadu Buhari, ex-this, ex-that; former governor, former Minister of Petroleum, former chairman, Petroleum Trust Fund (PTF), among others. What many of our politicians would call lucrative appointments that they would be ready to die for. Indeed, many Nigerians who eye public office would have mansions as head of the least rewarding of these institutions.

    And, to those of you who would be asking or wondering what of his house outside Nigeria, the man had answered your question before he died. “In one of my meetings with King Charles III, he asked me an interesting question if I had a house in England, and I replied that I don’t have a house, not an inch, anywhere outside Nigeria,” then President Buhari said while receiving Letters of Credence from the High Commissioner of the United Kingdom, Richard Hugh Montgomery, and his counterpart from Sri Lanka, Velupillai Kananathan, at the Presidential Villa in Abuja in May 2023, shortly before he left office.

    For me, this counts not just for something but for a lot, especially in a country where corruption is rampant and many people see public appointments as avenues for corrupt enrichment and personal aggrandisement.  When we see what some local government chairmen own just after four years in office, you wonder what product they are producing that is yielding so huge profit to provide the kind of comfort they sustain. Governors are in a world of their own.

    Buhari is dead and gone for aye. But I was somewhat touched when I read in the social media that Aisha, his wife, said after the man’s death that he asked her to apologise to Nigerians that he might have offended. And, as if to be answering the question of where precisely Buhari told her that, Aisha said: “Ever since he left office, he often told me that if he passed away before me, I should kindly ask Nigerians to forgive him for any wrongs he might have committed during his time in power.”

    Again, whether Buhari did well in office or not, he had a befitting burial. I doubt if there has been any Nigerian leader that had received the kind of befitting burial that the man got in recent years, and within so short notice. He died at about 4.30pm on Sunday, July 13, in a clinic in London and, his remains were committed to mother earth about 48 hours later in his hometown, Daura, Katsina State. Yet, it was as if he had died a long time ago and there was adequate time to prepare for his burial. Credit for this goes to the present government that did the needful in the circumstance.

    Everything, including the weather cooperated on Tuesday that he was buried. There was no rain even as the usually hot Katsina State had a relatively low temperature that made the occasion somewhat more of a pleasant experience for the mourners and guests that thronged the town of Daura from where Buhari hailed, to pay their last respects to him.

    My people would say “o ye Buhari, egan ni hee” (Buhari’s burial was grand unless we want to badmouth it)!

    Those who might have been wondering whether it was true he really had over 12 million votes on two of the four occasions he contested for the office of president must have seen it was for real and not the kind of fluke that usually attends such claims by politicians. He had six million in one and 15 million in another; that was when Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu (now president) intervened to boost his popular votes in the south. But for this, Jonathan would have had a better spread of votes and Buhari would have lost.

    I don’t want to be dragged into this unnecessary debate about Tinubu’s contribution to Buhari’s victory in 2015. But sometimes, not to do that would allow those wanting to turn history upside down to gain an undeserved and fallacious upper hand. As a matter of fact, I was also at a meeting of a few persons in the thick of Buhari’s illness where Tinubu said and I quote: ”Buhari, even on a stretcher”, unapologetically making his position known at a time many had written Buhari off.

    Be that as it may, the truth is; the man, Buhari, had the crowd. And when I say the crowd, I meant a genuine mammoth crowd of believers as against the rented crowds that many a politician is reputed for in this part of the world.

    Indeed, what kept running on my mind as I watched his interment live was that this could have been anybody. Here was a man who twice led this country, first as a military dictator and later as a democratically elected president, motionless. His body was wrapped with cloth just like any other person, and he was dropped six feet underneath like any other mortal, a sad reminder of the fact death is indeed a leveller. No special provision was made to import soil for his burial. No burial tourism.

    If our leaders reflect deeply on such occasions, this country would be a far better place to live in. They would realise that all these rat race for political office, stupendous wealth and fame would end the very day death comes knocking. I want to become this, I want to become that automatically comes to an end.

    I am here talking to today’s leaders in the country, from local government chairmen to governors and ultimately the president. They should all remember six feet. If they do, they will always do the rightful and Nigeria would be a better place for us all, even as their names would be etched in gold. That way, nobody would need to solicit for forgiveness for them when they die because they would have earned genuine commendation from Nigerians.  

    Definitely, it is not possible to please everybody at the levels of national service that Buhari operated. Nobody can walk without his head shaking, unless he has a stiff neck. What is important is for the office holder to do something good for the greater majority. Government policies must necessarily produce both positive and negative consequences. For instance, Tinubu government’s decision to remove fuel subsidy put an end to some people’s access to easy money without lifting a finger, and such people would never see anything good in the government. But the government should not worry about that, in so far as its decision serves the interest of the greater majority.

    That is the most profound lesson for them from Buhari’s death.

  • The movement of transition

    The movement of transition

    Last week, on Sunday to be precise, Nigeria lost two of her most famous sons. Even for a nation inured to endless mysteries and political perplexities, the astrological signals and significance of these departures could hardly be missed. It was like a double meteor falling off the skies in quick succession. Nigerians had hardly taken in the import of the passing of a former ruler of the country in faraway London where he had sought medical refuge only to be informed that a frontline traditional ruler had also joined his ancestors, this time in the privacy of the royal bedroom.

     General Mohammadu Buhari was a notable soldier and civil war hero who became a military head of state and was removed by his colleagues for his strong-willed inflexibility and inability to transcend primordial and provincial proclivities. A man of adamantine resolve, he later became a civilian ruler of the country after three unsuccessful attempts. In the case of Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona, he was a stellar and outstanding product of Nigeria’s durable and resilient traditional institution, becoming the Awujale  at the youthful age of twenty six in 1960 and going on to rule over his people with courage and forthrightness for the next sixty five years. After some youthful indiscretions, he settled down to rule his people with much royal flair and firmness.

    It was, as they say in this clime, the end of an era. But it is much more profound than that. It was a historic watershed for Nigeria. It was the culmination of the movement of transition in a particular direction which makes reversal in the former direction totally impossible having exhausted its historical and material possibilities. As enunciated by our former teacher Professor Oyin Ogunba, a liberal humanist and scholar of distinction, the movement of transition stresses the absolute contiguity between the world of the living and the world of the dead in the Yoruba cosmology. But it is a one-way traffic or as Amos Tutuola will put it in his colourful English: it is a journey to the land of the “unreturnable”. The dead have expended their visa and cannot return to the world of the living. This is why certain deaths are symbolic of a collective closure and the culmination of a particular phase of existence in a particular nation. It is the unforced and unhurried exit of certain historical forces and exceptional personalities that have dominated and determined the fortunes of their country for good or bad. They are what Charles de Gaulle, thinking of himself, called “sacred monsters”.

     The case of the late Awujale is more straightforward and less complicated. The nasty posthumous spat with traditionalists who wanted to take control of the royal remains notwithstanding, he was a beneficiary of more benevolent historical forces and a benign conjuncture. His was a cohesive society with core values shaped by the history and culture of his industrious and enterprising people. Among the various sub-nations of the cultured and cosmopolitan Yoruba people, the Ijebu people stand out for the solidity of their worldview, the rigour of their traditional institutions and the breezy confidence with which they deal with existential and historical exigencies. They have been living in the same domain continuously for over a thousand years and they have never been militarily subdued except once when overconfidence and lack of discretion allowed vastly superior British artillery to overrun their ramparts ending in a humiliating rout at Imagbon in 1892. They quickly recovered the initiative   after taking to heart the lesson that ancient amulets are no match for modern bullets.

      There can be no doubt that Oba Sikiru Adetona left Ijebu-Ode a much better, more prosperous and culturally thriving place than he met it, with his people more united, more vibrant, more accomplished and forward-looking. Thanks to his cousin, Mike Adeniyi Adenuga the Globacom mogul, the annual Ojude Oba gathering has been transformed into a global cultural extravaganza which has brought world-wide fame and recognition to his domain. He had met Ijebu-Ode a rural municipality and had transformed it through sheer determination and the force of his towering personality to a thriving modern city with well-paved roads, majestic edifices, amenities, first class institutions and a slew of industries. Nothing that could add lustre and prestige to his beloved town escaped his attention and searching scrutiny. A personal example will suffice. After the burial of Toun Onabanjo in 2011, yours sincerely in the company of some notable Yoruba leaders, repaired to his palace.

     It was our first and last meeting. After introduction, the Awujale concentrated his gaze and attention on the columnist bemoaning the fact that one was one of those Ijebu children lost to the diaspora. Even after Chief Segun Osoba had told him that one was from a village in Osun State, the revered monarch insisted on our departure that the columnist must return home to put something on ground. Such was his charismatic charm and the goodwill he radiated. By the time he joined his ancestors last Sunday, the late king had been transformed into a supranatural personage of transcendental courage and immanent integrity, a mighty oak and auroch among men. Little wonder that the entire Ijebuland had been thrown into deep mourning and depression.

    Read Also: FAAC shares highest allocation of N1.818tr in June

     Unfortunately, the same thing cannot be said about the general from Daura who left his country far more bitterly divided, polarized and impoverished than when he met it as a self-professed born again democrat and civilian leader. In death as in life, General Mohammadu Buhari split his country and people centrally. While the Nigerian ruling class and its global cohorts showered effusive encomiums and fake testimonials on him, the teeming masses of Nigerians across ethnic and religious lines were not impressed. They jettisoned the cultural admonishment not to speak ill of the dead as nothing but feudal veto and autocratic overreach.

    Angry callers jammed switchboards condemning him as an ineffectual political leader and his reign a massive rip-off and hypocritical scam. Never in living memory, except the passing of General Sani which was met with widespread celebrations and wild jubilation in some sections of the country, has a Nigerian leader met with such hostility and scarification in death. They accused him of not walking his talk on corruption, of leaving Nigeria with a worse security nightmare and of compounding the problems of ethnic, religious and cultural diversities in the country. Yet others hailed him for his infrastructural feats which are unequalled and unprecedented in the annals of the country and his massive empowerment schemes which turned out a classic instance of Stone Age economics compounded by a fiscal fiddling of the Exchequer.

     These divergent and countervailing opinions point at something more fundamental: a deeper structural misalignment of the nation which Buhari was fundamentally incapable of perceiving. He was a systems man and not a system changer or disruptor. His was a narrow and circumscribed feudal worldview in which all the issues were already settled and in which everybody was supposed to know his place. Having such a man as a leader in a roiling postcolonial menagerie of combustible contradictions is a cruel set-up. But power hungry while being politically maladroit Buhari was a willing martyr and accomplice. He allowed himself to be set up while also setting up the country and its teeming expectant populace. Under the spreading colonial chestnut tree of political perfidy, you sold me and I sold you.

    A man of more cultivated social habits, wider reading regimen and sharper political instincts would have seen through the fog from a mile off. Throughout his life, there was a lingering whiff of spite, resentment and scornful contempt as if he could not live down the haughty condescension of the blue-blood feudal Brahmins who looked down on him as belonging to an inferior caste of forest dwellers and the humiliation of having been toppled by his own junior colleagues. After he was elected the president of the country, a senior military colleague and former benefactor was known to have remonstrated with him that it was time to forget and forgive those who had wronged him in the past. He was said to have looked up in consternation at his former boss before exploding: “Including Ibrahim?” Yet it was the same Ibrahim whose magnanimity and generosity of spirit made sure no harm came his way on the night he was arrested and dethroned.

    Nigeria is not a unified or homogeneous country. Its contradictions have not been simplified and unbundled to a simple confrontation between the haves and the have-nots. Those, including this writer, who invested unrealistic hopes in the general from Daura have not been fair to him or the country. We had unfairly surmised that with his populist mystique, his aura of authority and messianic infallibility he would be the avenging avatar that would drag the north by the scruff of the neck screaming and kicking into the portals of modernity. But General Buhari is not a Colonel Mustapha Kemal Ataturk; neither is he a Colonel Gamal Abdel Nasser or even Colonel Muammar Ghaddafi for that matter. This is because Nigeria is neither Turkey nor Egypt or Libya. We must always modify our expectations based on the internal configuration and the state of nationhood of each country.

    General Mohammadu Buhari has given it his very best shot. He was not a rebel or a radical but a former herd-boy made good. In an engrossing play of irony, his military superiors who in 1976 upon the assassination of Murtala Mohammed foreclosed his appointment as Chief of General Staff, Defense Headquarters on the patriotic grounds that based on his political clumsiness such an appointment might imperil a sterling military career merely opened a surer path to political preeminence for him. General Obasanjo and General Danjuma could not see far into the turbulent future. Both Buhari and Shehu Yar’Adua, the man who acceded to the post, were classmates in Katsina Provincial College but there is no evidence of deep friendship between the two. The two military brass hats ended up in partisan politics with Yar’Adua perishing in Abacha’s Gulag while Buhari went on to become a twice elected civilian president.

      With the transition of General Buhari last Sunday, we have reached the end of an era; a critical threshold in the history of the nation and the culmination of events which began fifty years earlier with the overthrow of General Yakubu Gowon and the ascendance, military dominance and political hegemony of the civil war officers, those heady warriors who believed that because they fought for the unity and preservation of the country, they also had a right to control the political and economic destiny of the nation. They have left their deep marks on the tumultuous history of the nation. It has taken half a century for the nation to discharge its debt of obligation to them. But now, Nigeria has entered a new phase.

  • UN condoles with Nigeria over death of former president Buhari

    UN condoles with Nigeria over death of former president Buhari

    United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, on Friday, paid a heartfelt tribute to Nigeria’s late former President Muhammadu Buhari, and personally conveyed the UN’s solidarity with the government and people of Nigeria.

    According to a report by the News Agency of Nigeria  (NAN), Guterres, during his visit to Nigeria House in New York, described Buhari as a leader whose unwavering dedication to Nigeria, Africa and global cooperation will stand as his enduring legacy.

    Guterres signed the condolence register during his visit.

    “On behalf of the United Nations, I extend my heartfelt condolences on the passing of His Excellency, Muhammadu Buhari,” Guterres wrote in the register.

    “President Buhari will be remembered for his steadfast commitment to selfless service, his leadership in advancing peace and stability across the African region and his dedication to strengthening institutions in Nigeria.

    “President Buhari was also a great supporter of the United Nations and a strong voice for multilateralism, solidarity and sustainable development around the world.”

    The UN chief concluded his condolence message: “In this moment of loss, our thoughts are with his family, the Government and the people of Nigeria.”

    Speaking afterwards, the UN Chief reflected on his working relationship with Buhari and praised his lifetime of service.

    “I had the privilege to work with President Buhari and I will say, I am a great admirer of his extraordinary work.

    “Not only in defence of the interest of his own country, Nigeria but in his commitment to the African continent, to sustainable development and very particularly to the United Nations and multilateralism.”

    Speaking about Buhari’s contributions to West Africa’s peace and security, Guterres described the late Nigerian leader as a crucial stabilising figure for the region.

    Read Also: Presidency slams ADC over Buhari’s burial remarks

    “I think President Buhari has been a leading personality in defending the interests of West Africa and in a very difficult context, in affirming Nigeria’s leadership,” he said.

    The UN chief affirmed that Buhari’s contributions to West Africa’s peace and security “was of course very much appreciated.”

    Guterres extended the UN’s sympathy to Buhari’s family, the Nigerian government and people, assuring that the world remembers him as a true servant-leader whose legacy will inspire generations to come.

    The Chargé d’Affaires, Permanent Mission of Nigeria to the UN, Mr Syndoph Endoni, thanked Guterres for the condolence visit.

    Endoni said the condolence visit highlighted Buhari’s standing as a statesman whose voice carried weight far beyond Nigeria’s borders.

    Amb. Bola Asaju and the Head of Chancery of the Mission, Mr Razak Lawal, were among the officers who received the UN chief during his condolence visit.

    Buhari died on Sunday at a London hospital at the age of 82 and was buried in his hometown in Daura, Nigeria on Tuesday.

  • YSFON pays tribute to late President Buhari

    YSFON pays tribute to late President Buhari

    The Youth Sports Federation of Nigeria (YSFON) has joined millions of Nigerians in paying a glowing tribute to the late Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari, describing him as one of the greatest supporters of grassroots sports in the country.

     President Buhari, who ruled both as a Military Head of State from 1983-1985 and Civilian President from 2015-2023, died last Sunday in  a London Hospital at the age of 82 and was buried on Tuesday in his hometown,  Daura, Katsina State, according to Islamic rites

    Read Also: NFF  names Mary Akinsola  Super Falcons’ Media Officer

    In a condolence message personally signed by its National President, Dr. Nasiru Gawuna, the Federation noted that President Muhammadu Buhari was a symbol of discipline and public service, saying that his belief in youth empowerment and national unity inspired many, including those in the sports sector.

    “It’s on record that under his leadership, sports became a strategic tool for diplomacy, economic development, and youth engagement and indeed one of his last acts in office on May 28 2023 was signing the National Sports Commission Act 2023 into law.”