Tag: BUHARI

  • Don’t blame Buhari for budget crises – Gbajabiamila

    Don’t blame Buhari for budget crises – Gbajabiamila

    The Majority Leader of the House of Representatives, Hon Femi Gbajabiamila, has urged Nigerians not to blame President Muhammadu Buhari for the problems in the 2016 budget.

    Gbajabiamila, who said this while receiving leaders of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) in his office in Abuja at the weekend, said civil servants should be held liable for the crises.

    He said: “I’m going to absolve the President, but I’m not going to absolve the people that put it in. Why I absolved the President, I will tell you.

    “The job was done by civil servants, it has always been done by them (civil servants).

    “The President does not sit in a ministry, he doesn’t know what’s going on there or what they need or do not need.

    “The argument will be that the buck stops at his desk and he must take responsibility, I agree with that. But the point is that he delegated responsibilities. Under the constitution he has the right to delegate his work to ministers. And he delegated the issue of budget and planning to the minister of Budget and Planning.”

  • Buhari fires 13 varsity VCs

    Buhari fires 13 varsity VCs

    •Appoints replacements, re-constitutes governing councils

    •CSOs kick over sack

    The National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN) and the 12 Federal Universities established by the Jonathan administration now have new vice chancellors following the unexpected removal of the incumbents by President Muhammadu Buhari.

    The president also approved the reconstitution of the universities’ governing councils.

    No reason was given for the action which drew the instant ire of some civil society organisations (CSO’s).

    The CSO’s claimed that the Governing Council of NOUN of which Professor Vincent Tenebe was a member is the only body empowered to remove him.

    Replacing Tenebe is Professor Abdallah Uba Adamu, who until now was of the Department of Mass Communication, Bayero University, Kano.

    Professor Auwal Yadudu, who served as Special Adviser on Legal Matters to the late military head of state, General Sani Abacha is the new Vice Chancellor of Federal University, Birnin Kebbi.

    He was until now of the Faculty of Law, Bayero University, Kano.

    A former head of the Department of International Relations at the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Prof. Kayode Soremekun is the new Vice Chancellor of the Federal University, Oye-Ekiti, Ekiti State, while Prof. Fatima Batoul Muktar of the Department of Biology, North West University, Kano is the VC of Federal University, Dutse, Jigawa State.

    The rest are: Prof. Haruna Abdu Kaita, Federal University, Dutsin Ma, Katsina State; Prof. Andrew Haruna, Federal University, Gashua, Yobe State; Prof. Magaji Garba, Federal University, Gusau, Zamfara State; Prof. Alhassan Mohammed Gani, Federal University, Kashere , Gombe State; Prof. Muhammad Sanusi Liman, Federal University, Lafia; Prof. Angela Freeman Miri, Federal University, Lokoja; Prof. Chinedum Nwajiuba, Federal University, Ndifu-Alike, Ebonyi State; Prof. Seth Accra Jaja, Federal University, Otuoke, Bayelsa State.

    Education Minister Adamu Adamu merely said in a statement yesterday that : “The President, Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces  and Visitor to all federal universities, President Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR, has approved the appointment of new vice chancellors for the 12 under-listed Federal Universities and the National open University of Nigeria with effect from Friday, February 12, 2016.”

    The Ministry in a separate notice said the president had approved the reconstitution of the governing councils of the new 12 Federal Universities with immediate effect.

    The chairmen of the new councils are scheduled to meet with the minister tomorrow in Abuja.

    However, the Coalition of Civil Society Groups protested the VCs’ sack in a letter to President Buhari.

    The group said the action contravened the provisions of the Universities (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act No.11 of 1993 (as amended) by decree No.25, 1996 and further amended in 2003 and 2012 respectively and other agreements as contained in the 2009 FGN staff union agreement.

    The petitioners claimed that four out of the 12 new VCs are from Bayero University, Kano alone, which in their view violates the federal character principle.

    They said: “while this does not come as a surprise owing to the influence of one of the Special Advisers to the Minister of Education in orchestrating the appointments of his friends and cronies without following due process, we are, however, concerned about the constitutional breach and the resultant litigation battle this action may cause, which in turn may generate unnecessary distractions to your focused administration.

    “While we are not unmindful of the fact that you would have acted on the recommendation of the Minister of Education in approving their removal, it is pertinent to know that in the pursuit of ambition driven by unguided passion and greed, impunity becomes inevitable as the end irrespective of the means is all that matters and in this case, the removal of these Vice Chancellors is the outcome of an unguided passion and greed by the Minister of Education and his Special Adviser.

    “The constitution is quite clear on the procedures to be followed in the appointment and disengagement of Vice Chancellors and none of these procedures were followed in the above case.

    “The appointment of Vice Chancellors is a tenured appointment, which presupposes that every appointee is expected to serve the prescribed number of years as stipulated by the Acts governing the institutions.”

    The coalition said none of the Vice Chancellors was allowed to complete his tenure and all were removed without following due process of the law.

    The CCSG argued that if a Vice Chancellor must  be removed from office before the expiration of his tenure, it is only  the Board of the Governing Council that is  empowered to recommend or effect such removal.

    The group said: “In the above case, the Minister already dissolved the Board of the Governing Council with the statutory powers to recommend or effect the removal of a Vice Chancellor from office thereby making the removal of these Vice Chancellors illegal, null and void.

    “In appointing new Vice Chancellors or any public officer for that matter, it is an offence and a breach of the Federal Character principle for one third of the total appointees to come from a particular state.

    “The action of the Minister is greeted with sadness as it is considered a breach of the provisions of the University Amendment Act or legislation and to a large extent a gross violation of the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which guarantees universities autonomy in Nigeria.”

    The letter was signed by the coalition’s chairman, Etuk Bassey Williams and Secretary-General, Ibrahim Abubakar.

    However, Prof. Michael Faborode, the Secretary-General, Committee of Vice-Chancellors (CVC), has said the tenure of vice-chancellors of nine Federal Universities will expire on Feb. 15.

    He told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) yesterday in Abuja, that it would not be fair to say that the vice-chancellors were sacked.

    According to him, “The tenure of the vice-chancellors of nine of these universities expires on Feb. 15. It will be unfair to say that they were sacked; they have exhausted their tenure; when your tenure is not renewed; it does not mean you are sacked. I do not know the reasons why the vice-chancellors of the other three universities were affected.”

  • Be patient with Buhari, Uche appeals  

    Prelate of the Methodist Church Nigeria, His Eminence Dr. Samuel Uche, has begged Nigerians to exercise patience with the current administration in its determination to fight corruption and fix the nation.

    He told our correspondent on the sidelines of the 3rd edition of toward a new Nigeria and an Evening with the Chairman, Christian Association of Nigeria, South West Zone, Archbishop Magnus Atilade organised by Breakthrough Media at the Holy Cross Cathedral, Lagos last week.

    Captains of industries, public office holders and development experts participated at the event with the theme role of the church in nation building.

    There were awards for deserving Christians including the National and International Coordinator of Christian Pentecostal Mission (CPM), Rev Mercy Ezekiel;  General Overseer of Harvesting Faith Ministries, Dr. Dare Olaoluwa and  Chairman, Island Club, Lagos Island, Chief Owolabi Martins, among others.

    Uche said it was too soon to casting aspersion on the new administration just eight months after assumption of fund.

    The President, he said, is working hard to recover stolen funds and deliver on their numerous promises.

    Uche stated: “I will assess this new government after one year of their stay in office. They have just started.

    “Let us believe that they are setting the pace to work and need a little time.”

    Uche, who lauded the anti-corruption stance of this present government, said: “Nigerians should be patient with President Buhari as he is trying to recover stolen funds.

    “I believe that they are saving the recover funds to develop the country in no distance time.”

    Atilade charged church leaders to speak the truth to power while laying godly examples for others to follow.

    He took a swipe at some church leaders after money and lucre gains, saying the gospel is not for personal enrichment.

    According to him: “Let us promote good works, mirror the society, expose bad eggs, fight corruption, teach church growth, protect the church interest, influence government policies and advocate and persecution of human rights, people interest and welfare.”

  • Where exactly did Buhari go wrong?

    President Muhammadu Buhari is in deep problem with a set of social media-savvy critics who just would not see anything good in what he does, says or refuses to say. Good intentions or not, it is one battle the President seems condemned to lose if recent events are anything to go by. By the way, this set of critics is doing everything within its reach to make sure that Buhari beats the unenviable records set by former President Goodluck Jonathan as self-acclaimed “most criticised leader’ in the world. To them, every step taken to recover stolen loot, address the gaping infrastructural deficits, strengthen the dwindling fortunes of the Naira, make government transparent and accountable or empower institutions to discharge their responsibilities without fear or favour by Buhari often manifests the crying incompetence of his leadership. That’s the illogical logic they subscribe to. If they are not attacking his policies, they swoop on his gait, his body language or even the hidden message encrypted in his traditional attire. They have become powerful leeches that not only stalk the President but also test the inelastic patience of the former no-nonsense military Head of State.

    Do not get me wrong. No one is saying that the President should not be criticised, harangued or even vilified in order to make him walk his talk. Even ordinary Knucklehead enjoys doing that. What is condemnable is the disturbing trend in which criticism now flourish in the waters of mischief and banal calumny. While I acknowledge the need to caution the President against making statements that may project the country in bad light, it is despicable that certain elements who are yet to come to grasp with the reality of a Buhari Presidency would stop at nothing to grind his nose on rocky stone. It is even more dangerous when otherwise respectable individuals ingloriously peddle falsehood – all in an attempt to denigrate a man they love to hate. Like I once noted on this page, no citizen should be under any compulsion to love or hate any particular leader. However, what I found repulsive is the way and manner the characters that have coalesced to nail the President have been going about their vengeful campaign.

    Buhari may not be anyone’s poster boy for oratorical prowess but he has not been found wanting in articulating his points. Slow in his pitch and sometimes drab in speech with diction that tests the wit of the most patient interviewee, Buhari has never failed to articulate his points to the best of his understanding. And so, when the social media went viral with the news that Buhari had done the unpardonable by labelling all Nigerians as criminals in an interview he granted a British newspaper, “The Telegraph”  during his last visit to the United Kingdom, I had to tread on the path of caution.

    A full transcript of the interview on the newspaper’s website includes President Buhari’s statement that: “Some Nigerians claim is that life is too difficult back home, but then again some Nigerians have also made it difficult for Europeans and Americans to accept them because of the number of Nigerians in different prisons all over the world accused of drug trafficking or human trafficking. I don’t think Nigerians have anybody to blame. They can remain at home.”

    At least, common sense, which is a rarity among his growing band of traducers, dictates that one ought to go through the ‘vexatious’ interview before taking a position. It is pointless to note that if Buhari had specifically described all Nigerians as criminals, as some allege, he would have automatically become the nation’s Number One criminal at the world stage. This thinking, more than anything else, fired my interest in sourcing for the full text of the controversial interview especially when the issue had become a hot topic on the Twitter handle of a serving Senator who prides himself as making common sense, oftentimes outside the Red Chamber.

    In a society where tasteless rumour catches faster than wild fire, it did not take long before these ‘patriotic’ Nigerians came up with the hash tag “###I am a Nigerian, I am not a criminal” which turned out to be the greatest hoax of this year. At least, for now. And so, right before our very eyes, a silly, denigrating kite flown by a delusional relevance-seeking senator about the leader of his country resulted in the herd mentality in which common sense took a flight and buffoonery was writ large on the canvas of hatred. They were out to criminalise the President’s statements but they ended up fooling themselves. By the way, how come no one bothered to take some time off the lunacy on the social media to find out if their target of bile actually label over 160 million Nigerians criminals? Could it be because of a blind desire to see Buhari fail?

    Curiously, Buhari said many things which those who would want him to roast in the sun ignored. Naturally, he couldn’t have been playing to their script when he said all efforts to negotiate the return of the abducted Chibok girls had come to naught because the security forces do not have “any evidence of a credible leadership” within the deadly Boko Haram sect as there was “conflicting information on the status of Abubakar Shekau”, it’s most prominent leader in the Jonathan era. Those answers were simply not the ones the opposition sought, to  latch on with the aim of demonise the President.  Not even Buhari’s veiled response to questions regarding the form of foreign military interventions that the country would get could elicit the kind of excitement one had expected from this band of critics. It mattered not that the President told the foreign media that Nigeria-trained soldiers now battle the insurgents with some degree of successes unlike in the past where the government hired mercenaries from South Africa and other countries. Yet, these were the same Nigerian soldiers who “had a good record across West Africa” before allocations to the military find their way into private pockets culminating in the current probe of $2.1bn arms money allegedly diverted by former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd.). As far as they are concerned, Buhari was merely ranting when he expressed regrets about “how the mighty has fallen.” Who cares if it stays fallen forever anyway?

    So what exactly could have drawn their ire and led to the twist in the tale in that interview? Well, they were miffed that the President failed to tell a lie or, at most, justify the craze by some Nigerians to seek asylum abroad under the pretext that their lives were under threat back home. Asked if it was “legitimate” for this set of Nigerians to use migrant routes to the UK to claim asylum saying that their lives were under the persistent threat of the Boko Haram insurgents, Buhari retorted: “Some Nigerians claim is that life is too difficult back home, but then again some Nigerians have also made it difficult for Europeans and Americans to accept them because of the number of Nigerians in different prisons all over the world accused of drug trafficking or human trafficking. I don’t think Nigerians have anybody to blame. They can remain at home. Their services are required to rebuild the country. If their countrymen misbehaved, the best thing for them is to stay at home and encourage the credibility of the nation.”

    To the senator who started it all and his twittering community, the President stands condemned for daring to deplore the criminal intents of those tarnishing an already battered image in which hundreds of our fellow citizens are serving terms for different kinds of offences. For them, common sense demands a diplomatic dribble around the question. Instead of “criminalising” all us, he could have blamed anyone else but Nigerians for risking their lives through illegal routes to get to Europe, for engaging in the dangerous world of drug trafficking, for packaging vulnerable young girls for sex slavery across the globe, for laundering billions of dollars for privileged Nigerians in high places, for engaging in shady businesses and all other dangerous ventures. As a President of Africa’s largest gathering of black people, he should have kept mum about the fact that, as at May 2015, prisons in Asian countries are swarming with over 130 Nigerians on death row over drug related offences; that the UK harbours a former influential state governor in Nigeria in its prison facility; that some are languishing in the same facilities in the United States and even in some African countries.

    That, I presume, is where Buhari missed it. He is a complete failure when it comes to living in self-deceit. His greatest undoing remains his brash commitment to saying the truth. He needs to spice it up with what those who felt criminalised by his responses would rather call diplomatese – covering the lie with some sweet fragrances of untruth. Buhari needs to learn the art of wowing his audience with hollow sophistry that leads to nowhere. For now, he is yet to learn the logic in that principle as being espoused by the senator and his deluded followers. And that’s why it would take more than a denial for The Presidency to wash off this latest allegation that he criminalises a whole nation. But it is not too late to make amends. The path to self-delusion can begin as soon as the President resumes duty. When next he flies to Europe and asked questions touching on whether Nigerians have an image problem abroad, he should fire back with an emphatic “No” instead of the long-winding response he gave in The Telegraph’s interview where he said: “Certainly. But we are on our way to salvage that. We will encourage our countrymen to stay at home, work hard and make a respectable living at home.”

    He could, if he wants, add that the people back at home have been salvaged from the shackles of poverty and are living like kings and princesses in an atmosphere devoid any deadly attacks by terrorists, arsonists and pure criminals. That’s the only way to assuage the fears of the pretentious lot that wax lyrical on the social media about common sense logic that they never get to live in real life. Unfortunately, it’s that sort of political correctness that has left us in this quandary as the criminals run when no one is pursuing them. Do they give a damn? Shame!

     

     

  • Tributes as Olubadan is buried

    Tributes as Olubadan is buried

    Two years after he attracted the same for his centenary birthday, the late Olubadan of Ibadan, Oba Samuel Odulana Odugade 1 on Friday attracted the creme-de-la-creme of the society to the city as his body was interred.

    The presence of top political leaders, leaders of thought, captains of industry, academia and traditional rulers practically shut down the city for hours, while Oba Odulana’s funeral ceremonies lasted.

    Eminent personalities from all walks of life joined the chief mourner, Governor Abiola Ajimobi, to bid the monarch farewell.

    Leading the dignitaries was President Muhammadu Buhari, who was represented by his deputy, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo.

    Also in attendance at the church service were governors Rauf Aregbesola (Osun) Akinwumi Ambode (Lagos) and Ibikunle Amosun (Ogun ).

    Oyo State Deputy Governor, Chief Moses Alake-Adeyemo, also joined his boss to receive guests.

    The Minister of Communication, Barr. Bayo Shittu, and his Ministry of Health counterpart, Prof. Isaac Adewole, also joined the service.

    Others included a former Governor of Osun, Senator Isiaka Adeleke; Chief Harry Akande, wife of a former Oyo State Governor, Alhaja Mutiat Ladoja and Chief Adeniyi Akintola (SAN).

    Others are the Speaker of the state House of Assembly, Hon. Michael Adeyemo; state Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief Akin Oke; senators, members of the House of Representatives and prominent Ibadan elders.

    Other dignitaries at the service included former governors of Oyo State, Gen David Jemibewon, Otunba Adebayo Alao-Akala and Chief Omololu Olunloyo.

    Emeritus Prof. Oladapo Akinkugbe; former Head of Service of the federation, Prof Oladapo Afolabi; President, Christ Apostolic Church (CAC), Pastor Abraham Akinosun; Archbishop of the Catholic Church, Ibadan Diocese, Archbishop Leke Abegunrin; Chief Akin Olujimi (SAN); Sen. Soji Akanbi; members of the Olubadan-In -Council and members of the Oyo State House of Assembly were also in attendance.

    The service was held at the Cathedral of St Peter’s, Aremo, Ibadan, where the late monarch worshipped till old age.

    Paying glowing tributes to the late traditional ruler, President Buhari called on Nigerians to emulate the exemplary lifestyle of Oba Odulana, describing him as an epitome of honesty and dignity.

    He said the departed monarch exhibited the fear of God throughout his lifetime.

    In his remarks, Governor Ajimobi also extolled the virtues of the late monarch.

    He said Oba Odulana possessed exemplary attributes.

    Ajimobi said Oba Odulana left indelible marks in politics, civil service, military and other leadership positions he was privileged to occupy before his ascension to the throne.

  • If Buhari is frugal, he should learn to lead like José Mujica

    If President Muhammadu Buhari, his executive cabinet, the judiciary and eighth National Assembly possess the capacity to be truly humane and progressive, they would seek greater understanding of their role as Nigerian public officers and more importantly, attain true purpose and direction by the wisdom and example set by former Uruguayan President, José Mujica.

    Mujica, 77, served as leader of Uruguay between 2010 and 2015. He was elected in 2009 but he had no interest in taking on the grand presidential lifestyle. As president, he reportedly donated 90 percent of his salary to the impoverished and small scale entrepreneurs. He scorned the vulgar opulence characteristic of contemporary presidencies like Nigeria’s, to live in a farmhouse, off a dirt road in Montevideo; there he and his wife worked and still work the land themselves, cultivating chrysanthemums for sale, having declined to live in the opulent presidential palace or use its staff. He also scorned the official presidential motorcade.

    The austere leader earned $12,500 a month but reportedly kept only $1,250 for himself. “I do fine with that amount; I have to do fine because there are many Uruguayans who live with much less,” Mujica disclosed in a newspaper interview.

    While in power, he rode a 1987 Volkswagen Beetle car. In 2010, the value of the car was $1,800 and represented the entirety of the mandatory annual personal wealth declaration filed by Mujica for that year. In November 2014, the Uruguayan newspaper, Búsqued, reported that he had been offered $1 million for the car; he said that if he did get $1 million for the car, it would be donated to house the homeless through a programme that he supports.

    Mujica was able to improve quality of life for the citizenry via populist economic policies. Uruguay thus enjoyed an impressive GDP considering it’s the second-smallest nation in South America. He was known for speaking his mind, defending basic human values and attacking the dark sides of modern life. He did so in a remarkable speech at the sustainability summit in Rio de Janeiro four years ago. In September 2013, Mujica reiterated his philosophy of leadership and humanity to the United Nations General Assembly, with a very long discourse devoted to humanity and globalization.

    The speech called on the international community to strengthen efforts to preserve the planet for future generations and highlighted the power of the financial systems and the impact of economic fallout on ordinary people.

    As a Colombian newspaper said, it was ‘the speech world leaders did not want to hear, but is shared by the rest of the world.’ The speech has been called poetic, prophetic, romantic, lyrical and flat out weird. It’s not exactly your 16-minute TEDtalk, but it definitely projected ideas worth reliving.

    Excerpts of the speech:

    “We have been talking about sustainable development, about rescuing the masses from the claws of poverty…What is it that flutters within our minds? Is it the model of development and consumption, which is shaped after that of affluent societies? I ask this question: what would happen to this planet if the people of India had the same number of cars per family as the Germans? How much oxygen would there be left for us to breathe?

    “More clearly: Does the world today have the material elements to enable seven or eight billion people to enjoy the same level of consumption and squandering as the most affluent Western societies? Will that ever be possible? Or will we have to start a different type of discussion one day? Because we have created this civilization in which we live: the progeny of the market, of the competition, which has begotten prodigious and explosive material progress. But the market economy has created market societies. And it has given us this globalization, which means being aware of the whole planet.

    “Are we ruling over globalization or is globalization ruling over us?…Today, man does not govern the forces he has unleashed, but rather, it is these forces that govern man and life. Because we do not come into this planet simply to develop, just like that, indiscriminately. We come into this planet to be happy. Because life is short and it slips away from us. And no material belonging is worth as much as life, and this is fundamental.

    “But if life is going to slip through my fingers, working and over-working in order to be able to consume more, and the consumer society is the engine-because ultimately, if consumption is paralyzed, the economy stops, and if you stop economy, the ghost of stagnation appears for each one of us, but it is this hyper-consumption that is harming the planet.

    “And this hyper-consumption needs to be generated, making things that have a short useful life, in order to sell a lot. Thus, a light bulb cannot last longer than 1000 hours. But there are light bulbs that last 100,000 hours! But these cannot be manufactured, because the problem is the market, because we have to work and we have to sustain a civilization of “use and discard”, and so, we are trapped in a vicious cycle. These are problems of a political nature, which are showing us that it’s time to start fighting for a different culture.

    “I belong to a small country well endowed with natural resources for life. In my country, there are a bit more than three million people. But there are about 13 million cows, some of the best in the world. And about 8 or 10 million excellent sheep. My country is an exporter of food, dairy, meat. It is a low-relief plain and almost 90% of the land is fertile.

    “My fellow workers, fought hard for the 8 hour workday. And now they are making that 6 hours. But the person who works 6 hours, gets two jobs, therefore, he works longer than before. But why? Because he needs to make monthly payments for: the motorcycle, the car, more and more payments, and when he’s done with that, he realizes he is a rheumatic old man, like me, and his life is already over.

    “And one asks this question: is this the fate of human life? These things I say are very basic: development cannot go against happiness. It has to work in favor of human happiness, of love on earth, human relationships, caring for children, having friends, having our basic needs covered. Precisely because this is the most precious treasure we have; happiness. When we fight for the environment, we must remember that the essential element of the environment is called human happiness.”

    Mujica is a farmer. Buhari is a farmer. The difference between both men’s touted simplicity is that, while Mujica practiced what he preached by scorning the trappings and vulgar luxury of presidential office, President Buhari curiously, is unable to do so. Nonetheless, Buhari represents Nigeria’s best hope at the moment, amid the pack of hounds masquerading as ‘Change Agents’ in the presidential cabinet and National Assembly.

    In these hard times, Almighty Eledumare help Buhari navigate his way through the luxury-traps and political landmine hindering him from steering the nation’s ship to the promised land. If he could truly aspire to a simple life like Mujica’s, he may enjoy the citizenry’s unflinching support at taming the gluttony and alleged excesses of his colleagues in the National Assembly.

    And let’s hope the younger generation of Nigerians are able to present worthier replacements for the Buhari generation or what Nobel Laureate, Wole Soyinka, aptly described as the ‘Wasted Generation’ come 2019.

  • Who is afraid of Buhari and Tinubu?

    SIR: So much has been said and written about Sir Ahmadu Bello and Chief Obafemi Awolowo. These two were great men who led their people with vision. The north is yet to have the good old days of the Sardauna and the West still bask in the euphoria of Awolowo’s state policy in education and the economy. Awolowo’s numerous books on national statehood are in the public domain. It says a lot about him, and his pristine principles.

    Had these two ruled further and lived longer, they might have been celebrated, truly so, for their fountain of knowledge and greatness needed for the country’s growth. As great as these leviathans were however, they didn’t see eye-to-eye on national policies, each asked their supporters to “watch my six” as they say in the military. It might have been better if the supporters had ‘watched the six’ of the nation as opposed to the region.

    Little wonder the Sardauna chose to remain a premier instead of prime minister, ostensibly to avoid moving to Lagos and running affairs of the nation from the West. Little wonder Awolowo only travelled to the north a handful of times.

    Great leaders have their own moment of ascendancy to the heights and while on the pedestal, their spirit soars to their destined apogee. They consciously radiate dutifulness, responsibility and decency in ways alien to mortal man. They bear in mind fraternally that “matter and spirit are completely different elements” and they do not allow self to be driven by philistinism, the banality that has destroyed many a small man.

    The prevailing reality in Nigeria today is that there are few heroes and heroines. True heroes exhibit commitment to a cause, goal, an idea that is accepted by those who celebrate the hero as worthy. Often, however, the yardstick for determining heroes is not clear, and jingoists have cashed in on this to deceitfully robe contenders on ethnic or regional basis, and so a Muhammadu Buhari and Asiwaju Bola Tinubu may be heroes to many and villains to others. “One man’s hero” it is said, “may be another man’s villain.”

    Heroism, ordinarily, is as a function of deeds, it also relates to time and space.

    Why should anyone be afraid of Buhari and Tinubu? These two, even though have not established universities, written tomes of books like Chief Obafemi Awolowo and Sir Ahmadu Bello, to many are greater than them for the reason that they have been able to unite the north and west in ways that those luminaries could only have imagined.

    Buhari and Tinubu showed statesmanship by rallying the national troops for national growth forgetting the age-old chasm that had been created regionally. Authentic heroes pursue a cause; which must gladden the hearts of all and heroes act out heroic script without fail.

    Many do not want to live in the still calm of life because they know that “Great necessities call out great virtues.” These virtues include appreciation of reality and distinguishing between phantoms and reality. They include the abandonment of the petty route of “fanning the embers of hatred and exacerbate our already complicated problems in the country”.

    Tough order indeed that only few progressives can handle. Buhari and Tinubu are two of the greatest pantheon of political greats in this dispensation and both can alter the democratic stake in 2019

     

    • Simon Abah,

    Port Harcourt, Rivers State.

     

  • Buhari resumes work at Aso Villa

    Buhari resumes work at Aso Villa

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Thursday resumed work at the State House, Abuja, after a six- day vacation.

    A statement issued by the President’s Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina, said Buhari, in compliance with Section 145 (1) of the Nigerian Constitution, has sent a formal notice of his resumption to the Senate President and the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

  • Group urges Buhari to disband AMCON, save Ajaokuta

    A resident of the Progressive Miners Association of Nigeria (PMEA) Suuday Ekozien has urged President Buhari to disband the management committees in Ajaokuta steelý, as a means of reviving the plant.

    Ekozien added that ýwhat is presently happening in Ajaokuta is abnormal because what Ajaokuta needs is a complete restructuring, close down the place, all the concessioning because all the other litigation boils down to ownership responsibility.

    He stated this yesterday in Abuja, while speaking with journalists on the means of revivingý the steel complex and solid minerals sector as a whole.

    He added, “If we truly want to change, what should be done in the case of Ajaokuta is, instantly disband whatever you call management and technical committee in place within one week and not one year.

    “One year is too much, this is just like the case of justice delayed is justice denied this is because the challenge to the revival and development of the sector has been as a result of lack of ownership responsibility which is fully rested on the President.”

    Recalling the Ministers interaction with the senate committee on solid minerals, Ekozien said “it is a shame to the nation and I agree with him, as a professional in the field and to compound the issue AMCON is paying frivolous salaries on monthly basis to workers that are not productive”

    “What Ajaokuta needs is an emergency, drastic action, close down the whole place, put security in the place, have a retrospect, have a current assessment and then un bundle the problem that has been impeding the functioning of Ajaokuta and Ajaokuta will function.

    “What is going on in Ajaokuta is abnormal, what Ajaokuta needs is a complete restructuring, close down the place, all the concessioning and all the other litigation boils down to ownership, responsibility, none of these people have put in money into that place, what they are doing is access stripping. Anybody it is concessioned to strip every asset there metallurgical coke that was imported into Ajaokuta during the Shehu Shagari regime, cannot be found there any longer, everything has been sold off, not used here in Nigeria but exported out of the country because the current steel rolling mills we have in the country currently is purely recycling”

  • Buhari didn’t call Nigerians criminals – Presidency

    Buhari didn’t call Nigerians criminals – Presidency

    The Presidency on Tuesday night described as misconstrued, the various interpretations of President Muhammadu Buhari’s comments during an interview he granted the UK’s Telegraph newspaper on February 5.

    It also insisted that President Buhari didn’t call Nigerians criminals in the interview.

    A statement issued by the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Malam Garba Shehu, said the wave of negative reactions trailing the President’s remarks about the reputation of Nigerians abroad was due to incomplete understanding of President Buhari’s point.

    He said: “President Buhari was asked about the flood of migrants from Nigeria and the fraudulent applications for asylum put in by people desperate to leave their motherland at any cost, and it was this question that elicited his response.”

    To know the truth about the matter, he encouraged Nigerians to avail themselves of a full text of the interview already available on the Telegraph’s website.

    He said it was preposterous for anyone to imagine that the President of Nigeria would describe all the citizens of the country he leads as criminals, when he himself is a Nigerian–obviously not a criminal–and when there are many Nigerians of honest living making their country proud all over the world.

    Shehu, however added: “Unfortunately, there are also Nigerians giving their country a bad image abroad, and it is to those Nigerians that the President referred to in his comments,”

    Stressing that people may play politics and online games with the President’s comments, he said the fact of the matter remains that Nigeria’s reputation abroad has been severely damaged by her own citizens.

    He said: “These Nigerians who leave their country to go and make mischief on foreign shores have given the rest of us a bad reputation that we daily struggle to overcome.”