Tag: BUHARI

  • Buhari to ministers: You must be agents of change

    Buhari to ministers: You must be agents of change

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Thursday charged the ministers- designate to ensure they key into the goals of his administration and be the agents of change that will transform the country.

    Buhari spoke during the opening session of a two-day Presidential Retreat for the 36 ministers- designate at the old Banquet Hall of the State House, Abuja.

    The theme of the retreat is: “Delivering Change: From Precepts to Practice.”

    The President also told the ministers- designate to observe the rule of law and shun impunity in the conduct of government activities.

    Stressing that they must count themselves privileged to have been chosen to serve among millions of Nigerians, he said the retreat was aimed at getting them acquainted with the direction of his administration.

    Buhari also reminded them of his campaign promises of fighting corruption, insecurity and revamping the economy.

    He also charged the ministers- designate to work together as a team.

    While reiterating his resolve to diversify the economy, he said their achievements should be counted based on the number of Nigerians that are moved out of poverty.

    “Avoid wastes and conserve resources,” he said.

    He told them the official channel of communication between them and the Presidency in line with the requirements of the Presidential system is through the office of the Chief of Staff.

  • What Buhari told elected officials

    What Buhari told elected officials

    The meeting was an unusual one. The venue: State Banquet Hall. Garba Shehu, who sat beside, refused to tell me why President Muhammadu Buhari should want to address the governors, members of the National Assembly and members of the Houses of Assembly at the same time. Where would the others sit, since the governors and members of the National Assembly had taken up everywhere? Garba merely volunteered: “I can assure you that all arrangements are in place. I believe that this will be one of the most historic meetings convened by a Nigerian leader since independence and didn’t invite you here for nothing.” Then the proceeding began, well, almost began.

    The first surprise was Buhari‘s appearance. He wore a casual evening dress and strolled in with Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, even before most people were seated. There was no state protocol anywhere, as he exchanged banter with people who either walked up to him, or whom he approached as he moved around. He had a small microphone pinned to his top, so, his exchanges could be heard all around the hall. Someone jokingly remarked to him that security was lax around him and he replied that he had no need to complicate his life by dragging security personnel around him in what he considers a family meeting. He then went on to observe that any of his ‘elected compatriots‘ who, after the welter of gruelling screening before entering the Banquet Hall, still represented a security threat to him personally or anyone else in the hall was welcome to do his worst – since they would all be losers. Everyone roared with laughter.

    Then, without warning, the massive screens strategically positioned around the Banquet Hall came alive. One after the other, alternating live photographs of the various Houses of Assembly came up. They were all in session or, to be quite exact, they were all convened but their respective speakers were not presiding over any proceedings. The speakers and principal officers of the respective Houses sat in the open plenary. Conclusion: the 36 Houses of Assembly were wired up, via video conference facilities, to be part of the presidential evening.

    Again, I turned to Garba and observed that, like me, no one seemed to know why they were called together. Again, he said that all was well and that the reason would soon become clear. I found the entire thing roundly perplexing, because there was neither programme of events, nor any flier that would give some hint as to what one should expect. Worse still, there was no Master of Ceremony. So, I sat back, knowing that whatever was afoot would unfold in the course of the evening. Then the President began his address, but not from any high table. Only the Vice President, the Governor of Kaduna State, the Senate President and the Speaker of the House of Representatives sat with him on one of the circular tables in the hall.

    “Good evening fellow compatriots, he began. “This is not a formal meeting of any sort. I have only invited you here as fellow Nigerians who were elected by their respective constituencies to stand forth for them, speak for them, protect their interests and serve the fatherland as custodians of what is best for the common good.

    “This means that the qualification for being part of this meeting today is primarily the fact of having been lawfully elected by accredited Nigerian voters. In choosing this forum and format to share some thoughts with you on some of the most serious challenges facing us as elected representatives, I merely wish to share my concerns and perplexities as someone who has been elected like you to serve”. Everywhere was quiet, dead quiet.

    Then the President asked: “What do you think most Nigerians expect from those they elected into office? Varied answers were given, but it all revolved around the idea of better living conditions, greater security and improvements in social infrastructure. But one of the governors pointed out that the people also assume that elected representatives and leaders are duty-bound to give them money and violate the rules to please them, whenever anyone came with one tale of woe or the other. The President acknowledged all the views as right and went on to elaborate on the comment about the wrong demands and expectations of some sections of the citizenry.

    His words: “The leader is, first and foremost, a standard-bearer and custodian of the right values for the people. He is to lead them in the right direction, for their own good, and not follow them wherever their appetites direct them. Does a herdsman not lead his cattle away from the cliff edge, instead of just following his grazing cattle? Would a father give a child poison simply because such a demand is made of him?” he asked rhetorically.

    He continued: “Corruption is not just embezzlement of public funds. It is first and foremost a distortion of values. It is fuelled not only by the impunity of public office holders, but by an emergent national political culture that treats the national treasury as a slush fund that the various federating units should take turns to plunder. I want us, as elected defenders of the rights of Nigerians and as those entrusted with their fate and fortunes, to realise that the fight against corruption is actually a fight to restore and reinstate the culture of `rule keeping` in everything we do as a people and as a nation.”

    Everywhere was quiet. Then Buhari went on to talk about education, national orientation, the collapse of various institutions of state and much more. Forthwith, he asked another question, this time a rhetorical one: “Do you agree with me that even with all the money in the world, the traumatised people of this country need more of values than funds to regain their full integrity as a people? Please do not feel that I am patronising you, or presuming to know better than anyone here. You can see that I have come with no prepared speech. I am just another Nigerian who, like everyone else, must one day stand before God to give account of how he served this nation when it fell to his lot to give leadership. Anyone who is over 40 years of age, as we all are, should have a sense of primary responsibility towards maintaining a sustainable society”.

    He urged everyone to disagree with him on any point, as he bared his mind on all matters of state. “We have developed and maintained a culture of consumption for decades. Several of my elected compatriots who are governors will retire to absolute luxury, with a lifestyle unrelated to the earnings and economic stature of their respective states, or their local economies. Are we not actually complicating our lives and further distancing leadership from the people and from the culture of leadership we all grew up with? Should we, as responsible adults, leading a struggling nation, not feel embarrassed by `retirement benefits` approved by various Houses of Assembly for governors? Should we help in creating a society that is neither healthy nor sustainable from the standpoint of natural justice, equity and good conscience?

    Then the President moved on to talk about our national symbols. “That will give you a fair idea of how far we have travelled on the road to national disorientation”, he said. “Our children do not know the meaning and actual details of the Nigerian Coat of Arms. It is the same with their teachers. Most state governments, federal ministries, federal and state parastatals and even divisions of the armed services parade a national Coat of Arms decked out with yellow horses. Yellow horses? Who has ever seen a yellow horse anywhere in the world? Nigeria`s National Chargers are white in colour and it should be so indicated everywhere. This may seem a small point, but it is not. In war, troops follow their standard- bearers and use it to rally. An army that fights under all manner of signs, and which accepts whatever rag or shape that is waved at it as a rallying symbol, is finished.”

    The President urged a return to simplicity and truth at all levels. “A local government chairman is a custodian of value for his people, the same way that the president, the governors, the school principals, the market leaders, etc. are custodians of value. The leader is like a pure spring of water. The people will drink dirty water, suffer from ailments or even die, if all that comes out of this spring is bad water,” Buhari said.

    He said that the citizens should stop beating their chest to say ‘yes, Buhari should deal with the terrible leaders so that we can have a better society‘, but they are still demanding dirty water (wrong values) from the few good leaders (pure springs) who are on the right path.

    After over four hours of sustained exchanges, including questions from some of the Houses of Assembly, the event came to a close. Most of the people left in silence. As I turned to Garba and Femi Adesina to ask how the exchange could be replicated for schools and leadership down-liners all over the nation, I woke up. What, it was all a dream?

     

  • Whither is Buhari really taking Nigeria?

    President Buhari, and many spokespersons for his presidency, are saying that the Buhari presidency will eliminate corruption and strengthen the unity of Nigeria. That Buhari is seriously set against corruption is not in doubt. That he is already weakening corruption in significant sectors of the public service is self-evident – and that is a commendable accomplishment. But the millions of Nigerians who wish that Nigeria should attain true unity, survive as a country, and go on to prosper, are waiting to hear what President Buhari intends to do about a sustainable basis for the unity of Nigeria. I am sure that most Nigerians regard this as more important than the war against corruption.

    For a start, by appointing nearly all the non-ministerial officials of his presidency from the North and virtually excluding parts of the country, Buhari has aroused fears among very many Nigerians about his true intentions for Nigerian unity. Anyone who wants to know how worried Nigerians are becoming about this should just look in the media, especially the social media on the worldwide web. This is not a partisan issue at all; as many members as non-members of Buhari’s party are voicing concern. Even some northerners are voicing concern. The growing question is this: Is Buhari leading us back to the same old path of “unity” that was designed to be enforced by an Arewa North domination? Certainly also, it does not help that the formal organization of the president’s party, the APC, is given scant regard in the president’s actions. Does this portend that the president will be leaning mostly on some hidden back-door advisers and organs of his own, rather than on the political party that procured the votes of Nigerians, the party that promised CHANGE to us all? Does the quest for unity, for democracy, and for accountability, not demand that the open, constitutional, and formal establishments and processes of governance be openly upheld and employed for our country’s government?

    But there is a much more important issue – namely, the constitutional structure of our federation. I mean the need for restructuring our federation in such a way as to ensure harmony among our various peoples, and in ways to ensure that each federating unit of our federation shall be able to develop its resources competently, provide for its citizens, conquer poverty among its citizens, and make its own kind of contributions to the overall prosperity of our country. I am not urging President Buhari to implement, or not implement, the decisions of the National Conference that his predecessor organized. What I urge him to do is to recognize that this issue of sane restructuring of our federation is the issue that will determine whether Nigeria shall be stable, and whether Nigeria shall survive as one country; and then I urge him to do something about it immediately. In all his public utterances, including his address to the country on its 55th anniversary, he has artfully evaded making any kind of statement on this issue. He must not continue to evade it. His whole legacy hangs on what he does about it.

    The basic truth of our country’s existence is that ours is a country consisting of many different nationalities – each living in its homeland, with its own culture, desires, and self-image. In recognition of these facts, the founding fathers of our country bequeathed to us at independence a federation in which the federating units (called regions) commanded the powers with which to develop their domains. By using those powers, those regions pushed our country admirably along the path of progress and prosperity.

    Unfortunately, the political leaders controlling federal power at independence wanted the Federal Government to have unrestrained control over the regions – because they wanted their own particular Hausa-Fulani ethnic nation to control all of Nigeria. They started by disrupting the Western Region. They did succeed in disrupting the Western Region, but the effort generated unexpected side effects, and Nigeria’s whole governmental system more or less crashed. That gave the military the audacity to take over. Under the mostly northern military command, a northern political and military axis gradually distorted the federal structure, subdued all powers and all resource control to the federal establishment, and subdued the federal establishment to northern control. The Federal Government became a ponderous, incompetent and hugely corrupt entity presuming to micro-manage all aspects and all corners of Nigeria, and the states became mostly impotent entities incapable of doing much for the well-being of their citizens. In the context of this monstrosity, corruption took over the life of Nigeria, and poverty and hopelessness became the lot of the overwhelming majority of Nigerians. And this is how matters still stand today.

    The demand for the restructuring of our federation is therefore a desperately important demand. It is about how to restore progress to our country and give all Nigerians a chance to hope again. Ultimately too, it is about whether our Nigeria will, or will not, survive as a country.

    Those who are involved in this mission of saving Nigeria by demanding federal restructuring must never cease pointing out the example of India, a country that is very similar to Nigeria in ethnic composition. At independence in 1947, inter-ethnic conflicts threatened to break up India. The far northern provinces seceded and became independent countries of Pakistan and Bangladesh, and the rest of the country seemed to be headed towards disintegration. Large numbers of Indians who wanted their country to survive embarked of a vigorous demand for a proper structuring of the Indian federation. The Indian politicians gradually yielded to these voices and saved their country by sensibly restructuring their federation on the basis of ethnic nationalities, and by devolving a lot of powers and resource development to the states. The larger nationalities became states; contiguous small nations joined hands to form states. India became a union of 28 states, each state designing its own internal structure and constitution. India then redistributed powers between the federal and state authorities, giving to the states control over their resources, and much more to the states than to the union in all revenue allocation. India did not only survive; it began to prosper.

    Some of those who oppose the restructuring of the Nigerian federation usually voice the accusation that a desire to break up Nigeria, or to secede, is the real motive behind the call for the restructuring. Many who make such accusations are just “smart” politicians playing clever games – politicians who are using these accusations to hide their secret personal or ethnic agendas and vested interests. They are merely trying to obstruct.

    However, there are some Nigerians who honestly and sincerely fear that using our nations as basis for the states of our federation could lead to secessions and the breaking up of our country. Some prominent Indians had the same kind of fear about India in the early 1950s too; but those fears have never materialized. Instead, India stabilized and grew stronger, because the nationalities became more comfortable about being part of India. Most Nigerians who want their nations to secede from Nigeria today are simply tired of Nigeria’s confusion, insane inequalities, corruption, and conflicts. If Nigeria becomes a more orderly and stable country, most of today’s desires for secession are likely to vanish – similar to what happened in India.

    In summary, there are two options facing us Nigerians.  If we leave our federation as it is now concocted, with an irrational states structure and a federal authority that controls all aspects of our lives and virtually all our country’s assets, the obvious contradictions, and the inevitable deprivations and conflicts, will break up our country sooner or later. If we courageously do what the Indians did, and restructure our federation, using our nationalities as basis for state formation, and giving significant amounts of responsibilities, resources control and funding to the state authorities, the chances are that our country will survive and thrive.  This is a matter over which every Nigerian must step forward and speak up. President Buhari must take the lead.

  • Nigeria fully committed to peace in Africa – Buhari

    Nigeria fully committed to peace in Africa – Buhari

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Wednesday said all efforts to achieve political stability and maintain peace in Africa will continue to receive Nigeria’s full support.

    Buhari made the remark while speaking at an audience with Special Envoys of President Pierre Nkurunziza of Burundi, at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    The President, in a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu, said under his leadership, Nigeria will remain at the forefront of efforts to achieve enduring peace, security and progress in all African nations.

    This, he said, was because whatever happens elsewhere in Africa affects Nigeria directly or indirectly.

    He said African leaders must all do their best to achieve greater peace, political stability and security within their countries so that they can give more attention to the urgent task of improving the living conditions of their people.

    Thanking the envoys, Maj.-Gen. Evariste Ndayishimiye and Ambassador Dieudonne Kwizera, for briefing him on recent political developments in Burundi, President Buhari was optimistic that all stakeholders in the country will resolve their differences peacefully and learn to work together for the development of their country.

    He welcomed ongoing efforts by President Nkurunziza towards peace and national reconciliation in Burundi.

  • Why all ministers won’t get portfolios, by Buhari

    Why all ministers won’t get portfolios, by Buhari

    President gets list of confirmed nominees

    Retreat for incoming cabinet members

    All is set for the inauguration of the Federal Executive Council (FEC) following President Muhammadu Buhari’s receipt of the list of ministers-designate from Senate President Bukola Saraki.

    The would-be ministers will begin a retreat in Abuja tomorrow to prepare them for the task ahead, it was learnt yesterday.

    They may be sworn in next week as the retreat is expected to end on Friday.

    President Buhari did not indicate when they will be sworn in when he received Saraki in Abuja yesterday.

    He, however, said not all the ministers-designate would get portfolios.

    Buhari thanked Saraki for the Senate’s clearance of his nominees, adding that he followed constitutional provision in picking his team.

    The Constitution, he said, stated that there must be a minister from each of the 36 states.

    “That was why I limited the number to 36”, the President noted, adding:

    “The Constitution said there must be one member of the cabinet from all the states but the Constitution did not say I must have 36 ministries.”

    He said the country could not afford a large carbinet because of the prevailing economic realities.

    The economy, he said, had been battered, explaining that he was being factual by saying it as it is and “not to scare investors as the opposition is claiming”.

    “Any investor who is interested in investing in Nigeria will know about the economy. So, when I talk about the position of the economy, I am also looking for investors,” Buhari said.

    Earlier, Saraki said: “Mr. President, we finished the screening of the last batch of the ministers on Thursday and we waited for the adoption of our votes and proceedings today (yesterday) which we finished this morning.

    “I want to formally present the list of the 18 ministers who have now been cleared to you and that makes a total of all your 36 nominees that have been cleared by the Senate.

    “I was just engaging the Senior Special Assistant (SSA) to check in the records when last that happened. So it must be a credit to the nominees that were submitted and also a credit to the Senate.”

    Speaking with State House correspondents, Saraki said the screening and confirmation of the nominees were faster because of the quality of those presented by Buhari.

    “Secondly, it is the fact that we put in the time to vigorously put the nominees to answer the questions and at the end of the day we found out that most of them met the requirement and the Senate was satisfied.”

    On having ministers without portfolio, he said: “Well I think before we had ministers of state in the past, I don’t think there is anything new, there was minister for special duties which really doesn’t have a portfolio.

    “I think the key issue is being in the cabinet; is being a part of government and those that would have the responsibilities of ministering are those that at the end of the day would do that.

    He said the issue of his trial at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) did not come up.

    “Did you think that will come up in this kind of situation? No it didn’t come up,” he said.

     

  • Washington Post article: Five ways Buhari can save Nigeria

    Washington Post article: Five ways Buhari can save Nigeria

    AN international affairs fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, Matthew Page, has identified five things President Muhammadu Buhari can do to get Nigeria back on track.

    In an article published in the Washington Post, he said the President must “carefully clean the house”, reduce the number of parastatals, “tame the white elephants”, rein in sub-national debt and legislate for the long run.

    On tackling graft, Page said Buhari’s reform agenda probably faces its greatest threat from corrupt, old-school politicians within the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    “The U.S. Department of Justice has accused one sitting APC governor of helping former dictator Sani Abacha steal at least $458 million from state coffers. Buhari should neutralise some of the APC’s shadiest figures, who could emerge as ‘veto players,’ as described in Carl LeVan’s recent book,” he said.

    On parastatals, he said  Buhari has an opportunity to realise immediate savings by eliminating or merging some of the more than 500 federal parastatals and boards, which he said were used by past presidents to cultivate national political allies and provincial cronies.

    “Buhari may also want to disband some nice-to-have but non-essential parastatals in light of competing priorities and current fiscal constraints.  Does Nigeria need to spend more than $4 million annually on a Center for Space Transport and Propulsion?” he wrote.

    According to Page, industry experts were worried that Buhari’s bid to revive oil refineries and steel mills might end up like other white elephant projects where state-owned enterprises were funded for long periods, even if they incur huge losses.

    “Instead, he should address the graft, inconsistent policies and opaque privatisation deals that experts say turned these industries into white elephants in the first place,” he suggested.

    Page said as Buhari tries to put Nigeria’s public finances back in order, the 36 states’ balance sheets are sinking deeper into the red, with his administration having bailed out 27 cash-strapped ones to the tune of $2.1 billion. He believes states’ borrowing trends were risky and needed to be addressed.

    On the need to legislate for the long run, Page said: “Nigeria will need to feel the ‘Buhari Effect’ (the sense, evident in a recent New York Times article, that there is a new sheriff in town) long after the president’s tenure is over.

    “The best way for him to protect his legacy is to partner with the National Assembly to enact legislation enshrining key reforms.  With few other politicians like him on the horizon, Buhari should put his legacy in writing.

    “A good place to start would be an act prohibiting the use of ‘security votes.’ Both a definitive article by Uche et al. and a 2007 Human Rights Watch report illustrate how these secretive budgetary line items are used by officials at all levels of government as slush funds.

    “Even Nigeria’s leading anti-corruption agency had a $1,000,000 security vote included in its 2014 budget. Buhari has his work cut out for him.”

  • Ouattara’s victory is for unity, stability – Buhari

    Ouattara’s victory is for unity, stability – Buhari

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Monday night called President Alassane Ouattara of Cote d’Ivoire to congratulate him on his election victory.

    According a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu, Buhari, in the telephone conversation,  described the election as a “major victory for democracy’’.

    He also praised Ivoirians for the peaceful conduct of the election, noting that it was a clear indication that the people of the West African country are prepared to live with one another in peace and harmony.

    President Buhari told President Ouattara that his re-election for a second five-year term was an opportunity to continue leading Cote d’Ivoire along the path of greatness, peace and tranquility.

    He wished Ouattara a successful second term in office.

  • Saraki presents confirmed ministers’ list to Buhari

    Saraki presents confirmed ministers’ list to Buhari

    The Senate President, Bukola Saraki, on Tuesday formally presented the list of 36 ministerial nominees screened and confirmed by the Senate to President Muhammadu Buhari at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    Saraki arrived the seat of power about 3:00pm along with the Special Adviser to the President on National Assembly Matters (Senate), Ita Enang and the Special Adviser to the President on National Assembly Matters (House of Representatives), Suleiman Kawu.

  • Buhari urged to audit terminal operators

    Buhari urged to audit terminal operators

    •Firms accused of violating concession agreement •N10b realised yearly in demurrage, storage charges

    PRESIDENT Muhammadu Buhari has been urged to direct the Ministry of Transport,  Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) and Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE) to conduct performance audit of the concession of seaports  to determine their progress and challenges since 2006.

    The concessionaires, it was learnt, make huge amount from service charges and also rake-in over N10 billion annually, from storage and demurrage charges on importers and clearing agents without a corresponding improvement on their terminals.

    In 2016, it will be 10 years since the ports concession agreement was signed by NPA and the operators.

    A senior official at the Federal Ministry of Transport (FMoT), who asked not to be named, said some operators had not added value to their services and terminals since the ports were handed over to them.

    Most of the terminals, he said, were stocked with old equipment inherited from the NPA, adding that most of the inherited buildings are dilapidated and serving no purpose apart from occupying space that would have been converted  to cargo delivery and process procedure.

    Huge demurrage and other sundry factors, he said, are making the ports uncompetitive and unattractive for business.He therefore urged Buhari to address  the problem.

    The uncompetitiveness of the ports, the official said, has made it difficult for them to attain world-class status.

    More than nine years after the NPA surrendered its cargo handling functions to private terminal operators, the official said, things are not looking good.

    The ports, according to him, are still burdened with bureaucratic glitches, periodic technical blackouts and duplication of processes by a plethora of government agencies at the port.

    NPA, according to him, is well focused on its agenda to facilitate trade and reduce cost. The problems created by the concession, the official said, is hampering the robust injection made by the management of the authority into port operations.

    President Buhari, the official said, should see the problem as one of the key issues  to address while carrying out his reform programme for the maritime sector next year.

    The Federal Government and the NPA, he said, need to carry out competence and performance audit on each of the terminals, see where they have erred in law and apply sanctions where applicable.

    Investigation conducted by The Nation revealed that the terminal operators are collecting demurrage and storage charges both at weekends and public holidays, which is against the agreement  signed with the NPA before the terminals were concessioned to them in 2006.

    Article 1 of the concession agreement, exclusively obtained by The Nation, showed that importers are only expected to pay on “Business Days.”

    Business days, according to the agreement “means a day on which commercial banks in Nigeria are not authorised or required to close.”

    Efforts, the official disclosed, are on by the NPA, the Nigeria Shippers’ Council (NSC) and other critical stakeholders to reassess the gains of ports sector reform and make recommendations for refocusing and fast-tracking it in line with the Change Agenda of President Buhari’s administration.

    “In spite of the reforms carried out by the Obasanjo administration, Nigerian seaports still lag behind world-class ports in Africa and elsewhere, with respect to speed of cargo clearance, demurrage charges and ease of evacuation of cargo from the ports.

    “With a throughput of more than 90 million metric tonnes in cargo, there is something to cheer about this robust initiative of the NPA.

    “But we make bold to say that it is not yet uhuru, because  the system is burdened by bureaucratic glitches, periodic technical blackouts, and duplication of processes by a plethora of government agencies, which lead to rising demurrage charges and avoidable pains to many port users.

    “Figures from the Nigeria Shippers’ Council show that importers and clearing agents pay between nine and N11 billion annually for storage and demurrage charges alone.

    “Even after clearing their cargo from the Lagos ports, the poor state of roads leading to the ports make evacuation a nightmare for importers, other port users and residents of the areas,” he said.

    The official expressed the need for various government agencies at the ports to work together, speed up the clearing process and eliminate duplications in their roles. This, he said, will radically reduce the cargo dwell time to between two and three days.

    An importer, Mr Teslim Fatoki, urged the Federal Government to stop port concessionaires from charging demurrage during weekends and public holidays when banks are not opened for business.

    Fatoki called for rapid and radical expansion of existing facilities at the Lagos ports and the need to build new seaport to halt cargo diversion to ports of neighboring countries

    “The Buhari administration must ensure that port facilities of world class standard are provided to meet up with the demands of stakeholders in the maritime industry.

    “Government and NPA must embark on performance audit of the concessioning programme of the sea ports with a view to examining progress recorded almost 10 years since its commencement.

    “We need new investors that will add value and efficiency to our port system through the provision of modern cargo handling plants, equipment and technology, so as to make our seaports are competitive, user-friendly, efficient, cost-effective and attractive to stakeholders in the maritime industry,” Fatoki said.

     

  • Jonathan meets Buhari at Aso Rock

    Jonathan meets Buhari at Aso Rock

    Former President Goodluck Jonathan on Monday met briefly with President Muhammadu Buhari at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    The closed door meeting, which lasted for about 10minutes, was held at the new Banquet Hall.

    President Buhari accompanied Jonathan to his waiting vehicle at the end of the meeting.

    The ex-president didn’t speak with journalists during the duration of his visit.

    No official statement has been issued concerning the visit at the time of filing this report.