Tag: Bukola Saraki
-
Saraki describes his resignation call by Oshiomhole as joke
Senate President Bukola Saraki on Wednesday described a statement credited to All Progressives Congress (APC) chairman Adams Oshiomhole, asking him to resign his position as the Senate President on moral ground as a joke.Speaking with reporters in Ilorin, the Kwara state capital on the sidelines of the sixth remembrance prayer for his late father, Dr Olusola Saraki, the Senate President said that Oshiomole has no locus standi to talk about morality in today’s Nigeria’s politics.Said he: “That must be a joke coming from Oshiomole talking about moral ground. I think Oshiomole has no locus standi to talk about morality today. Oshiomole is somebody, who has been told to have been collecting not even naira but dollars from candidates and he is being accused by his party’s aspirants and Governors. I don’t think he has any moral ground, even to continue to be in politics not to talk about being a Chairman of a party.“I remember in those days even Oyegun, they never accused him of something like this. I have left that party. I’m sure the President, based on integrity, knows the right thing to do. So, on moral ground, he cannot speak on moral ground.Also speaking on Saturday by-election in Irepodun /Ekiti /Oke Ero /Isin federal constituency, Saraki decried huge deployment of policemen and sudden change of divisional heads of police in four local government areas for the by-election.“You see, the mistake we sometimes make, we forget that Nigeria is a big nation in this global world, not only in the context of Africa. We provide leadership. An action that we take that tries to suggest that we are not civilised with rule of law and processes, doesn’t augur well with the image. Today, the President is the President of ECOWAS likewise the Chairman of INEC as chairman of electoral bodies in Ecowas, even show that we are a responsible country.“So, when the Inspector General of Police(IG) begins to do things like this without following due process, it is not good for our country. And that is what we always stand for. And all those who supposed to caution him should ensure that due process is followed in thing like this.“We have been doing bye- election here, I have never seen where the Divisional Police Officers( DPOs), are being transferred. We have been doing bye-elections here, I have never seen where 200 or 300 security personnel are being deployed. It is not about Kwara, it is about the country. It is about how the world sees us. It is about how we provide leadership in the continent. And we keep on saying that people like these are not doing the President any good. The people at the end of the day will speak, and they should allow people to exercise their rights, vote in peace and vote their wishes and should not do anything that create fear or break law and order.“In spite of all these, I see PDP winning the election because we are on ground. There is no doubt about it. If you go round, you will know who is on ground. And you will see that in the results. They should allow people to exercise their rights”, he said. -
Saraki reiterates Senate’s commitment to passage of Police Reform Bill
The President of the Senate, Dr Bukola Saraki, has reiterated Senate’s commitment to fast-tracking passage of the Nigerian Police Reform Bill.
Saraki gave the assurance in a statement by his Special Assistant on New Media, Mr Olu Onemola, on Tuesday.
He said that the passage of the Bill would help to create a more responsive and efficient Police institution for all Nigerians, particularly with current security challenges.
“Guaranteeing the safety of the lives and property of Nigerians remains a fundamental concern for all members of the 8th Senate.
“As the representatives of Nigerians, all senators agree that there is a need to make our Police more responsive and effective to meet our security demands.
“In putting together the updated version of the Police Reform Bill, we have consulted widely, involving serving and former members of the Nigerian Police Force, private sector, members of the civil society and legal experts.
“These consultations have been done in a bid to ensure that this Bill is not only comprehensive in its coverage, but effective in building stronger institutional guidelines for our police,” he said.
The president of the senate also noted that the bill was aimed at amending the existing framework between the Police Service Commission and the Nigeria Police Force.
Read Also: 2019: Saraki confident of Atiku’s victory
He added that the bill would create community police fora at the state level to ensure closer oversight and participatory policing by the public.
He also said that the bill would ensure divisional and state police boards, which would be responsible for maintaining partnerships, promoting communication and building cooperation between communities and the police.
“These new incorporation to the bill touch on issues that will address the professionalism that should be enforced in the Nigeria Police Force.
“This is why it is our fervent hope that by the end of November, Nigerians across the country will be able to celebrate the passage of this bill.
“Our determination to fast-track work on the bill informed the recent decision to change the chairmanship of the Senate Committee on Police Affairs.
“The mandate given to the new leadership is to ensure that the bill which has passed second reading stage quickly goes through public hearing and committee stages so that we can pass it in the next few weeks,” Saraki said.
-
2019: Saraki confident of Atiku’s victory
The President of the Senate, Dr Bukola Saraki has said that he’s confident of the victory of the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar in the 2019 presidential election.Saraki, who is also the Director General of the PDP Presidential Campaign Council, assured that, given the mounting support by Nigerians, Atiku will coast to victory in the February 2019 presidential election.
Saraki was said to have stated this while inspecting the Legacy House headquarters of the PDP Presidential Campaign Council in Abuja on Tuesday.
Read Also: Thugs chase aggrieved Atiku supporters
A statement by the spokesman for the PDP, Kola Ologbondiyan said Saraki made the assertion while being conducted round various offices at the party’s campaign headquarters by the PDP LNational Chairman, Prince Uche Secondus.The President of the Senate was quoted to have promised to effectively harness and coordinate all efforts and lead the party and its candidate to victory in the elections.
“Since the emergence of Atiku Abubakar as PDP Presidential candidate, there has been renewed hope among Nigerians towards actualizing their collective quest to rescue our nation from the misrule of the incompetent, divisive and deceptive President Muhammadu Buhari-led All Progressives Congress (APC) administration.
“Already, Atiku Abubakar’s candidacy has reunited Nigerians across board and reawakened our collective consciousness towards the restoration of purposeful leadership and national productivity, irrespective of ethnicity, religion and political affiliations.
“The PDP therefore urges Nigerians to continue in mobilising for the election and be ready for an issue-based campaign that offers solutions to the myriad of security, economic and social problems the Buhari administration has plunged our nation into”, the statement added.
-
Atiku under fire over ‘extravagant trip’ to Dubai
The New Agenda for Positive Change, a civil society organization has taken a swipe at the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar for reportedly holding a strategy session with over 400 members of his team in Dubai, UAE.The Dubai meeting had in attendance, Atiku’s running mate, Peter Obi; the Senate President, Bukola Saraki.Also in the meeting were ex-Ogun Governor, Gbenga Daniel; ex-aide to former President, Reno Omokri, Bayelsa East Senator, Ben Bruce among several others.Reacting, however, the group said the development was a sad reminder of Atiku’s extravagant lifestyle, elitist mindset to governance which his years out of government had Nigerians to forget.Raymond Clarke Amuna, President of the group, said the development was an indication to his dangerous tendency to hand Nigeria over to foreign interests, with Dubai being his latest preference.Amuna in the statement challenged the PDP candidate to explain to Nigerians how he intends to run a domestic-oriented economy for the masses with the kind of lavish lifestyle of taking his strategy team with over 400 members to Dubai.Read also: Atiku will reduce fuel price, says PDP
He warned that a vote for Atiku would definitely signal a return to the era where even bottled water is imported into the country and Nigerians will again be conditioned to believe that only things that are foreign are good.According to him, “Each time Atiku Abubakar considers slinking to Dubai he should be mindful of how the opulence of the desert city warps his sense of proprietary. He has never returned from his Dubai trips lucid enough to accept the reality in Nigeria possibly because his guilty conscience pricks him to know that the PDP could have done better for Nigeria in its 16 years of misrule.“There are various exotic venues in Nigeria that he could have used and have members of his team spend money to boost the local economy but he decided to expend his N20 million annual income in ferrying Peter Obi, Secondus and other clowns in his circus to Dubai for the strategy session. It is therefore not surprising that his team issued the statement castigating the government for planning to use the proceeds of privatization to fund the national budget.“The first thing of note is that Atiku Abubakar, a onetime Vice President (1999 to 2007) and by default the Chairman of the National Economic Council (NEC) at the time, was the originator of privatization or in layman’s term selling government owned enterprises, businesses and assets. It was under him that the chant of “government has no business in business” or “government is incapable of managing businesses” first gained ground and have remained a part of our collective psyche today.“This is why even as the nation continues to explore the diversification of its revenue source under President Muhammadu Buhari, people have been conditioned to the point that no one is thinking of creating enterprises that will address unemployment and revenue sources simultaneously.“Secondly, Atiku Abubakar spoke from experience. He is not sure that the national assets in question would be allocated to him and his cronies as it was done under his watch when he held sway over the privatization of most of the country’s assets.“He is therefore definitely waiting until such a time when he is certain that he can acquire the same assets for pittance. His media organization ranted on about how the assets to be sold were built by the PDP without being able to list a single one of them, which implies that the PDP candidate is claiming what he did not achieve.Furthermore, the PDP Presidential Candidate is unmindful of the reality that the proceeds will be managed differently from the 16 years that his party was in power. It is publicly known that even the small money for which national assets were sold under his watch ended up in individual’s pockets. He thinks that the current government will, like the PDP, steal the proceeds of privatization. But this is where he is wrong because he can see for himself that the remnant of the nation’s resources that were not looted by the government Atiku Abubakar served in and successive PDP government have been put to good use.” -
PIGB: NASS to mount pressure for presidential assent — Saraki
President of the Senate, Bukola Saraki says the National Assembly will continue to mount necessary pressure to get presidential assent on the Petroleum Industry Governance Bill (PIGB).
Saraki spoke at a dinner as part of activities at the ongoing 24th Nigerian Economic Summit in Abuja on Monday.
The News Agency of Nigeria reports that the dinner which ended late in the night, was attended by trade experts, industrialists, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) operators and financial experts among other dignitaries.
According to Saraki, the resolve by the legislature to mount pressure to ensure the bill gets presidential assent has become necessary, given its importance to development of the oil and gas sector in Nigeria.
News Agency of Nigeria reports that President Muhammadu Buhari had withheld assent on the PIGB following its passage by the National Assembly.
The President had also communicated its decline of assent to the PIGB 2018, citing constitutional and legal reasons in the bill.
The Senate president said that it was unfortunate that the bill had not been assented to, adding “we took it as a responsibility to drive that bill to a level it has never been in a decade’’.
“That bill, a lot of people when we started said we cannot do it, but we demonstrated we have the political will and the commitment to do it.
“We passed the governance bill and it went to the executive.
“What I expected considering the kind of work that was done was for us both arms to seat down, because the issues that were raised are not issues that are not surmountable.
“Unfortunately, after so many months, the bill has come back with query that can easily be trashed out in a day session.
Read Also: Akpabio to Saraki: Senate leadership must change
“Those in the petroleum sector will agree with me that they have never seen the engagement we saw in the governance bill.
“Secondly, we had the fiscal bill and we have taken it to the point that has never been archived, but I believe a lot of the operators will want to ask what will happen to the fiscal bill if the governance bill was not assented to.
“Our intension is to go back to the executive and seat down with them in the interest of Nigeria.
“This is a very good bill as most operators and the technical people in the sector commended it.’’
He said the observation made on the bill was not enough reasons to stop its assent because of the huge positive impact it would make in investments in the sector.
“Because as you know, there is no serious investment going in the oil and gas sector because people are not sure of what to expect.’’
On cost of governance, Saraki said it was huge but added that there were some wastages that could be reduced.
The Senate president said the fight against corruption must be transparent, and credible, adding that effort should also be made to prevent it.
“For example, the main area where we produce our major revenue is mainly in the oil and gas sector.
“But when you look at corruption cases, I am not sure you will find many of the cases in that sector, the fight is so selective.
“But if it is transparent, you should start from where you are producing your large source of revenue.
“Because if you can tackle corruption in the sector, there will be less leakage down the line.
“For example today, we are back to spending close to 3.6 billion dollars petroleum subsidy, so apart from the national assembly, which anti-corruption agency is looking at that?
“The point I am making is that there should be a transparent process and approach in fighting corruption.
“If we can make the petroleum sector most efficient which accounts for large revenue, government will be more efficient.
-
Alleged contempt: Saraki concedes, pays Omo-Agege’s entitlements
*Case against Senate, its President withdrawn
The Senate President, Bukola Saraki has evaded the trouble of being subjected to trial for contempt as he conceded to the request for the payment of Senator Ovie Omo-Agege’s withheld entitlements.
The information that Saraki has authorised the payment of Omo-Agege’s entitlements was made public on Thursday by his (Omo-Agege’s) lawyer, Alex Izinyon (SAN).
Izinyon made the disclosure at the resumption of proceedings in the contempt case initiated against Saraki and the Senate by Omo-Agege, before the Federal High Court, Abuja.
Omo-Agege (representing Delta Central) initiated the contempt proceedings over allegation that Saraki and the Senate refused to obey a portion of the court’s earlier judgment ordering that he (Omo-Agege), who was earlier suspended, be paid his entitlements.
The Saraki-led Sanate had, earlier this year, suspended Omo-Agege, which suspension the court, in a May 10, 2018 judgement, set aside, ordered his reinstatement and the payment of all his accrued benefits for the period of the suspension.
Omo-Agege later returned to the court with a contempt case against Saraki and the Senate, claiming that while they reinstated him, Saraki and the Senate withheld his entitlements in disobedience to the court’s judgment.
On the last adjourned date, October 11 this year, Izinyon prayed the court to hear his client’s committal application against Saraki and the Senate, who were absent in court.
But instead, Justice Nnamdi Dimgba said he would give Saraki another chance to either “remedy the alleged wrong” or appear in court to defend himself, and adjourned to October 18.
Read Also: Court grants Shittu’s prayer to serve NYSC processes
On Thursday, when the case was called, Saraki was also absent. But he and the Senate were represented by a lawyer, Efut Okoi.
Izinyon told the court that his client was paid his entitlements on October 12, 2018, barely 24 hours after the court elected to accord Saraki another chance to either right the alleged wrong or attend court to enter defence in the contempt case.
Izinyon said after the last proceedings, he ensure that Saraki was served with the court order of October 11, along with a letter from his chambers informing him of Thursday’s date.
He added that on the next day, on October 12, a Special Assistants to Saraki informed him that his client has nine cheques waiting for him.
Izinyon said he received the cheques on behalf of his client and acknowledged receipt.
He said Omo-Agege acknowledged that there was a shortfall of N6m when the cheques were handed to him, Izinyon said when notified, the Senate President’s aide acknowledged that the Omo-Agege’s claim was correct.
He added that the Saraki’s aide admitted that the shortfall was from an error in computation. He said the error was promptly rectified and the N6m paid to his client.
Izinyon said, with the development, there was unnecessary to proceed with the contempt case.
He applied to withdraw the contempt case, and application Okoi did not object to, following which Justice Dimgba struck the case out.
-
Drama in Senate over $3.8bn subsidy fund
There was mild drama on Tuesday in the Senate over the management of over $3.8 billion fuel subsidy fund by the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).
Senators were at each others throat following accusations and counter accusations of alleged compromise in their line of duty.
There was also allegation of subterranean plot to source campaign funds from the oil behemoth.
Senate Minority Leader, Senator Biodun Olujimi, sparked the controversy when she raised the alarm over alleged mismanagement of huge subsidy fund.
Olujimi (Ekiti South) told her colleagues that it was dangerous to allow just two people in NNPC, the Group Managing Director (GMD) and the Executive Director in charge of Finance, as the sole controllers of huge subsidy fund.
The fund, she said, has been curiously renamed “Fuel Subsidy Under-Recovery Fund” for a purpose that has not been explained to Nigerians.
She recalled that NNPC has been severally requested to submit subsidy budget to the National Assembly for consideration and approval.
A request, the lawmaker said, has been resisted by the NNPC without reason.
She insisted that the Senate cannot sit by and allow only two people to continue to manage over $3 billion oil subsidy funds.
Olujimi who came under a point of order, reminded the upper chamber that attempts to compel NNPC leadership to do what is right by submitting a budget to the National Assembly on subsidy payment, has failed.
Read Also: Senate condoles with family of slain Red Cross worker
The amount involved, she reiterated, was “too huge for only two people to control and manage without appropriation.”
Olujimi said, “I need to bring this issue to the attention of the Senate. The NNPC is operating an illegal fund on subsidy. As a Senate, we are the true representatives of the people. We cannot sit back and allow this to continue to happen.
“I am bringing this to the attention of the Senate so that we can look at the issue. Let the various committees, especially the Senate Committee on Petroleum (Downstream), look into this issue. Let them investigate and tell us what the position on ground is.”
She prayed the Senate to mandate its committee on petroleum (downstream) to cause the NNPC to come before the senate to explain what has happened to the fund and the new terminology formulated to manage the fund.
Senate President, Bukola Saraki, agreed.
Saraki asked Senate Leader, Ahmed Lawan and chairman, Petroleum Committee (downstream) Senator Kabiru Marafa to inter face with those involved and report back to the Senate within four days.
He said that “the issue is too serious and the money involved too huge to be left just like that.”
Saraki said: “When we passed the budget, I said the executive needed to bring subsidy budget. In the light of the enormity of this, we will direct the Leader and chairman of Downstream to summon those in charge. They need to get back to us in four days. I don’t want this issue to be partisan. I want us to speak on the basis of fact. I don’t want us to take up this issue and people will begin to see it as a partisan issue.”
Some Senators were however not comfortable with the inclusion of the committee on Petroleum as part of those to investigate the matter.
Senator Mohammed Ali Ndume suggested that since committee on Petroleum has oversight function over NNPC, it should be left out of the probe.
The Borno South Senator re-echoed what Senator Buka Abba Ibrahim murmured that the Petroleum Committee might have compromised on the issue.
Apparently for emphasis, Ndume said that his proposal that the Petroleum Committee should not be part of the investigation stemmed from the insinuation by Ibrahim that the Petroleum committee might have compromised in the course of its oversight duty.
He said, “Issues like this should be looked at seriously. When these things happen, the committee should know. I suggest that the Leader and other people who are not members of the committee should look at this. The committee may have compromised. We should set up an ad-hoc committee to look into the issue.”
Marafa felt injured by the comment that members of his committee might have been comprised by officials of the NNPC.
The Zamfara central lawmaker said that he would not be bothered if his committee was disbanded.
He said that it would not be out of place to say that those proposing the setting up of ad-hoc committee in place of a standing committee have other motives.
He did not stop there. Marafa said that those behind the proposal for ad-hoc committee were actually gunning to generate campaign funds ahead of the elections in 2019.
There was uproar on the floor. Many senators attempted to shout him down. He persisted.
Marafa said that Ndume must also asked to withdraw his statement that members of his committee have been compromised.
He said that Ndume must not only stop at withdrawing the statement but also tender an apology to them.
He said, “I feel insulted. If the Selection Committee agrees today to dissolve our committee, I will not have any problem with that. They have the right to do that. But for anyone to just accuse us that we have been compromised, I think it is an insult.
“I know that those advocating that an ad-hoc committee be set up to investigate the issue are out to generate campaign funds for their election next year. They are free to do so. I will not stop them. But no one should malign us and accuse us of compromise.”
Saraki attempted to restrain Marafa.
Marafa refused to apologize.
He insisted that Ndume must first tender unreserved apology and withdraw his statement.
Sensing total break down of law and order in the chamber, Ndume told his colleagues that Buka Ibrahim had given him the authority to apogise and withdrew his statement.
Marafa followed and withdrew his statement. He also apologised to his colleagues for what many considered a sweeping statement.
The matter did not end there as the Senate Leader protested Marafa’s statement.
He declined to serve in the yet to be constituted committee.
Lawan said that he was declining his nomination to head the probe team to protect his integrity.
Although he did not mention Marafa, Lawan said that it took him several years to build his integrity and reputation and will not want anybody to soil his name.
Saraki and his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, requested Lawan to reconsider his decision.
The Senate President said that the Senate cannot afford to handle the issue haphazardly.
He said that “the country cannot be running a subsidy fund of $3.8 billion without knowing who is doing what.”
-
The rejected stone
Next year’s General Elections, particularly the presidential election, is beginning to become all the more interesting with the entrance into the race of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar as the flag bearer of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). The ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) will be in grand delusion if it underrates the capacity of the former vice president to worm his way into the hearts of Nigerians. Well, if you like, you may call them gullible Nigerians. While you reserve the right to so refer to them, it should also be realised that ‘gullible’ is only an adjective. Both the gullible and the not-too-gullible are entitled to one vote each once they are of voting age. And, at any rate, is today’s world not being governed largely by gullibility? If not, what would a Donald Trump be doing in the White House in America? Coming back home, why would a governorship contest between APC’s cerebral Gboyega Oyetola and PDP’s governorship hopeful in the hotly contested Osun State governorship election, Ademola Adeleke, renowned for his entertainment prowess, almost have gone the way of Adeleke but for providence?
For now, we can only console ourselves by hoping that the other front runners in the October 6 PDP National Convention which produced Atiku as winner would renege on their promise not to back whoever won the primary. But if they remain in the PDP fold, then the opposition party is likely to produce a formidable side to reckon with when the election comes. Make no mistake about it; those who ensured Atiku’s victory at the primary knew what they were doing. It was high-wire politics both from within the PDP and from without. To snatch the presidency from Buhari is too big a role for Lilliputians like Senate President Bukola Saraki. Atiku is more like it. That was their reckoning; and everyone of them in the race seemed to have accepted it that way because there is a common enemy that they all want out of power: Buhari, for very obvious reasons. Many of them who have survived the government so far cannot be sure of being lucky if President Muhammadu Buhari returns.
But that is not to say that the Buhari government has not played into their hands several times. It would however be a tragedy of monumental proportions if the PDP gives the ruling APC a good run for their money during the presidential election, or even has a better showing in the election outright. Indeed, it is not good enough if we have a repeat performance of Osun governorship election at the presidential election next year. I mean the APC has to win the election, if it must, convincingly at first attempt. The party will have itself to blame if PDP gets so close as to warrant a rerun. It would be worse for the APC to be crying foul while the PDP is running away with the trophy. Yet, if any of these frightening scenarios plays out, President Buhari should accept responsibility. It would amount to sheer scaremongering if a ruling party is the one weeping that the opposition rigged it out.
Trust former President Olusegun Obasanjo, he has swiftly endorsed Atiku, his one time political foe. What this endorsement of his former vice (yes, vice!) tells us is that in politics, there are no permanent friends or permanent foes, but permanent interests. We know that Obasanjo and Atiku had both gone their separate ways even while the latter was Obasanjo’s deputy in the Obasanjo administration (1999-2007). As a matter of fact, some account had it that Obasanjo prostrated for Atiku to get his second term when it seemed that his return ticket was under threat. Yet, it was Obasanjo that routed for Atiku while the latter was governor-elect in his Adamawa State. But, Obasanjo, who many believe neither forgives nor forgets, has not failed to demand his pound of flesh from Atiku whenever the opportunity presents itself.
Only a few months ago, Obasanjo had vowed that nothing would bring him close to Atiku again, at least politically, and that as a matter of fact, God would not forgive him if he did. This was a vow to which Atiku too replied that if his former boss had any issues with his creator, he should go sort them out with Him. Obasanjo seemed to have eaten his words and has now anointed Atiku as his presidential preference in next year’s election. The former president even waxed biblical in pardoning Atiku. He said with Nigerians voting for him, next year, “It will be with the hope or assurance of a Paul on the road to Damascus Conversion. After all, change and conversion are of man. I believe that with a contrite heart, change is possible in everybody’s life and situation.”
Again, just as this piece was being put together on Friday, I stumbled on a World Bank report that ranked Nigeria 152nd out of 157 countries. I know the government is going to react to this negatively rather than do introspection to see where its economic policies in particular require tweaking. That was the way the immediate past Goodluck Jonathan administration dismissed all such reports instead of doing something to change the situation for better. I wonder why government officials suddenly become paranoid about such reports when what is required is to do the rightful. But, the World Bank is not the only institution that is saying that something is wrong. The Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, has warned that Nigeria may remain the world’s poverty capital even as former United States envoy John Campbell parroted what has always been known about Nigeria being Africa’s troubled giant.
What one would expect is informed reaction to such statements and assertions from the seat of power. For instance, two take-aways from Chief Obasanjo’s statements when Atiku called on him centred on ethnicity and the economy; stupid! Again, Obasanjo said nothing new. These have remained sore points of criticism of the Buhari administration since its inception. What one expects is for the president’s aides not to dismiss these with a wave of the hand because they reflected the government’s style for long. Presidential aides or government officials who want to take on these allegations should tell us what has changed, instead of making it look as if the allegations are entirely baseless.
Moreover, APC should dwell more on its own achievements rather than keep telling Nigerians that Atiku is corrupt. They have been hearing that for years. This is sad to say though; but the point is that not many people see the government’s anti-corruption war in the same light as they saw it in 2015. Not a few have the feeling, rightly or wrongly, that there is little difference among the parties corruption-wise.
Honestly, this is not about sentiments. Notwithstanding my reservations about Obasanjo, the APC cannot want us to believe that his views now count for nothing. When he tore his PDP membership card about four years ago and pitched his tent with the Buhari team, the event was widely celebrated by the then opposition party and the then presidential hopeful’s handlers.
Nothing I have said foreclosed anything happening because, as they always say, ‘it is not over until it is over, especially in politics. President Buhari and the APC still have about four months to change the tempo of the game. They still have an ample opportunity to step up their performance in order to secure a straight, incontrovertible victory at the polls.
We need no one to tell us that this might jolly well be Atiku’s last opportunity at the presidency. He will be 72 next month; and if he loses the election, he has to wait till 2023, by which time he would be about 76 years old. Buhari became president at about the same age (72). But, going by the new mantra of not-too-young-to-run, a 76- year-old aspirant could be considered too old to run for the country’s number one seat by 2023. If Atiku sees this as his last chance, he would put everything into it. So, unless a miracle happens, the next elections would be tough. It is one in which virtually everyone concerned would put in their all to secure victory. If anything, Atiku is a veteran in the country’s political arena; he understands the game. Not only that, he also has deep pockets and he would spend as if spending is going out of fashion. Atiku has probably attained all that he craved for in life; fame, wealth, influence. Perhaps the only thing after his heart is the presidency. He would do everything to get it.
At this juncture, what I expect the APC to do is to collate all the criticisms against it; distill them and provide credible answers/solutions to them, irrespective of whether the claims are true or false; it is all about perception. The government could be swearing that certain things are not the way they look; if Nigerians are not sufficiently persuaded, whatever the government says will amount to nothing. This is where the Buhari government has to be careful. It should stop talking to itself; it should as a matter of fact listen more because that is the way it would not delude itself that there is no cause for alarm when in fact, nothing is under control. Just as I said after the Osun State governorship election, an election that the ruling party should win hands down at the very first ballot should not become a subject of controversial rerun just on account of delusion.
Like Governor Ayo Fayose of Ekiti State, shortly before meeting his political waterloo at the last governorship election when his dream of choosing his successor crashed under his very eyes, many Nigerians will be in great pains if APC, by omission or commission, allows the PDP that Nigerians rejected less than four years ago to become the cornerstone, and so soon. Most poignantly, that would not be a good emblem for the Buhari government’s anti-corruption crusade.