Tag: capital punishment

  • Capital punishment for kidnappers

    SIR: It is gratifying that the Senate has begun the process of the enactment of a law that will prescribe capital punishment  for kidnapping across the country. In a motion entitled “National wakeup call”, the Senate seeks to end a national opprobrium that has become endemic because of legal lacuna assailing prosecution.

    If this commendable bill sails through, it would be one of the best legislative endeavours to be enunciated by the eighth National Assembly.

    The next and a more exigent bill would be on corruption or stealing of public funds. Whereas the last president attempted to create a suspicious dichotomy between stealing and corruption, no translucent mind would buy into such dichotomy.

    Corruption has assailed the past, the present and the future of Nigeria perhaps more than any other known infraction since independence. It has placed Nigeria permanently on global hall of infamy. It has significantly reduced life expectancy, caused a geometric scale of Internally Displaced Persons, escalated unemployment rate and blighted the potential of Nigeria to join the comity of developed nations.

    The NASS will engrave its legacy in gold if corruption is made to attract capital punishment.

    However the bill must seek to graduate punishment according to the quantum of the perpetrated sleaze.

    Any sleaze in the region between half a billion and one billion naira should attract death penalty; N100 million to N500 million to attract life jail; N100 thousand to N500 thousand to attract 10 years imprisonment and one naira to N100 to attract one year imprisonment.

    Whereas  this type of legislative activism could trigger vulnerability among NASS members, the redeeming effect can translate each member into a national hero while posterity would indelibly inscribe this heroism in the consciousness of generations unborn.

     

    • Bukola Ajisola,

    Victoria Island, Lagos.

  • Lawmaker advocates capital punishment for looters

    Deputy Whip of the Lagos state House of Assembly, Hon. Omotayo Oduntan has said the death sentence for kidnappers should also be extended to public office holders who embezzled money to serve as a deterrent to others

    Oduntan made the call during a chat with Assembly correspondents in a programmed tagged, ‘Time out with the press’ organised by correspondents for lawmakers in the House at the Assembly complex Thursday.

    According to her, if capital punishment is introduced for public officers who dip their fingers in the national till it will reduce embezzlement.

    The lawmaker who represents Alimosho 2 also advised that such public officials who embezzled the type of humongous sums of money that is being reeled out on a daily basis by newspapers needs to be taken to psychiatrist hospital to have their brains examined to see if they are normal.

    She said, accumulation of such huge sum of money and property that will last up to their fifth generation would only make their children wayward and unserious “because they have so much money to play around with and at the end of the day the children end up not being useful to themselves, their parents, anybody and the society at large.”

    On death sentence for kidnappers, she said she is in support of the death sentence as prescribed by the National Assembly members.

    She however advised the Federal Government to provide more jobs for Nigerians as joblessness is partly responsible for the increase in cases of kidnapping.

    “Joblessness is partly responsible for the spate of kidnapping; by the time somebody graduates from school and stays at home jobless for three to ten years, they take to kidnapping to survive.

    “If more jobs are provided kidnapping will be on the decrease, because joblessness is part of the reason why people take to kidnapping after waiting for three to ten years without job, they resort to kidnapping,” she said.

  • Why we want capital punishment for looters, by NLC

    Why we want capital punishment for looters, by NLC

    The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) yesterday insisted on capital punishment for corrupt public office holders.

    It opposed life imprisonment for treasury looters, saying the country was not ripe for it.

    NLC President, Comrade Ayuba Wabba, spoke with newsmen in Ilorin, the Kwara State capital, during a condolence visit to former vice president of the union, Issa Aremu, on the death of his mother, Hafsat.

    He said: “We must canvass for capital punishment. It is only people who are stealing that will go against it.

    “If we are campaigning for capital punishment and people are kicking against it, we must be consistent because people are reaping from where they have not sown.

    “Except we begin to do the needful, it will be difficult to change our society. If you have followed up our argument, we have said clearly that part of why we are in this quagmire of challenges is that a lot of people have appropriated the resources that we need to drive development.”

    Wabba went on: “Schools are not developing; there are no drugs in hospitals. People have helped themselves and Nigerians are suffering.

    “So we have the right to demand good governance and accountability. The major problem in Nigeria is corruption.”

    He said workers kicked against plea bargaining because “it will be an incentive to encourage treasury looters because the loot will be too much so that during the process of plea bargaining, they may just part with little.”

    On factionalisation within the union, he said the rift has been settled.

    He explained: “The disagreement has been settled by the grace of God. We have settled and we are pushing ahead with a very strong force that all of us are, workers, citizens of this country will be happy with and you have seen the action we took, the protest which was for good governance and against corruption.”

  • NLC insists on capital punishment for treasury looters

    NLC insists on capital punishment for treasury looters

    The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has insisted on capital punishment for corrupt public office holders in the country.
    The labour union said it is opposed to life imprisonment for treasury looters, adding that the country is not ripe for that.
    NLC President, Comrade Ayuba Wabba spoke with reporters in Ilorin, the Kwara state capital on Saturday during his condolence visit to former NLC vice president, Issa Aremu on the death of her mother, Hafsat.
    “For us change means food on the table of the ordinary Nigerian person and not money in the pocket of few. Today many people are living below $1 per day and over 70 per cent of Nigeria are living like that. Change means changing this equation where there will be food in the table of all Nigerians; where our children can go to public schools.
    ” Most of the people in authority went to public schools. What we are saying in essence is that we must canvass for positive change.
    “We must canvass for capital punishment. It is only people who are stealing that will go against it. If we are campaigning for capital punishment and people are kicking against it, we must be consistent because people are reaping from where they have not sown. Except we begin to do the needful, it will be difficult to change our society.
    “If you have followed up our argument, we have said clearly that part of why we are in this quagmire of challenges is that a lot of people have appropriated the resources that we need to drive development,” the NLC President stated.

  • No, to capital punishment

    No, to capital punishment

    •But treasury looters deserve stiff and long jail terms, after a swift but fair trial

    The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), led by its President,  Ayuba Wabba and Trade Union Congress (TUC), under its President, Bobboi Bala Kaigama, have thrown their weight behind President Buhari’s fight against corruption.

    At a rally both Labour movements held on September 10 in Abuja,  not only did they advocate jail terms for looters, they also called for capital punishment for corrupt officials, as obtained in China and India.

    Mr. Wabba noted that corruption had badly damaged the core of Nigeria’s national existence, which called for a decisive action to prevent the nation from the brink of disaster.

    On the NLC’s support of capital punishment for corrupt Nigerians, Mr. Wabba said, “if such capital punishment can happen in China, India and South Africa, it can also happen in Nigeria; whatever measure that will address the issue of this mind-boggling corruption in the country, NLC will support it”.

    Mr. Wabba was particularly sad because he felt that massive corruption in the polity had deprived Nigerians good standard of living, and therefore supports the establishment of anti-corruption courts to try cases of corruption in the country. He then asked the Federal Government “to ensure that all the funds illegally looted from the treasury are traced and the looters brought to book”.

    TUC’s Mr. Kaigama, on his part, was especially worried about the inability of governors to pay workers for months on end, while pointing out that Nigeria had not experienced such long bouts of salary non-payments in the last 20 years.  He said that state governments had to rely on federal bailouts, before they could pay monthly salaries, was very bad, sad and scary.

    Comrade Kaigame declared: This sad scenario “is due to massive corruption in the country”. He therefore supports the enactment of laws for fighting corruption, and also that all public officers must declare their assets henceforth.  Calling for special anti-corruption courts, Mr. Kaigama called for the abolition of joint accounts for states and local governments, adding that such accounts are often abused by state governments.

    Organised Labour’s rather grim view on corruption is understandable.  The high level of corruption in Nigeria today is abhorrent.  Its spread and scope are alarming and threatening.

    Given the danger corruption poses to our survival as a people, and how it has promoted poverty and underdevelopment, we quite sympathize with Labour’s stand, canvassing death penalty for those found guilty of corruption.

    Still, we are philosophically opposed to death penalty — not for corruption  alone but for any offence.

    First, we believe death penalty is not the solution, although it would appear to send out dire signals to would-be looters.  So, instead of killing the corrupt — and given the epidemic, the number of the doomed will add up to a tidy sum — they should be jailed after conviction, and their loots recovered.

    So, nobody  found guilty of looting should be allowed to go scot free to enjoy his/her loot. But this can only be effective if the trial system is fast and swift, without losing the rigour of prosecution, and fairness of trial.  That way, the acused, the immediate victims of  his sleaze and the general society will get justice.  The moment looters of the public till know they face long years in jail, with its attendant shame and disgrace, we will start getting positive change.

    Still, even with a fair, fast and credible judicial process, prevention is still better than cure.  So,  we advise iron-clad preventive measures, that makes it almost impossible to steal public funds, not to talk of escaping with the loot.

    ‘We are philosophically opposed to death penalty — not for corruption  alone but for any offence’

    It is good and appropriate that the NLC, as a pressure group that should at all time keep government on its toes in a democracy, is back to its crusading turf. But while we appreciate the effort of the NLC in its support of the fight against corruption by the Buhari administration, we advise that Organised Labour should sustain its regained crusading zest.

    In order to be credible and convincing and therefore effective, we believe that charity must begin at home.  That means  the NLC must put its house in order, doing some soul-searching and self-cleansing, so as to rid its own rank of corruption.

    Anything short of this would surely weaken the credibility of the NLC and the TUC in their welcome support for President Buhari’s anti-corruption crusade.

  • Nigeria did no wrong on capital punishment

    SIR: For a long time now, the propriety or otherwise of the death penalty has become an issue of controversy not just in Nigeria but in the international community. Beyond the realm of secularism, death penalty is also a matter of serious concern in the realm of religion. This is borne out of the fact that the killing of a human being by another under any circumstance is viewed as a grave sin unto God.

    The argument against the death penalty has been that it violates the fundamental human rights of the convict to dignity of human person; this is because the condemned convict undergoes a very degrading psychological situation before and during the execution of the death sentence. It has also been argued that the continual retention of the death penalty in the statute books has not deterred the least of criminals on the streets.

    While some of these arguments remain faultless on paper, a question that must be answered is the practicability of these theoretical postulations in the Nigerian context. No matter how beautiful some of the submissions against death penalty may appear to be, one thing that would always remain about them is their imperialistic colourations, the fact that they are a subtle continuation of the colonisation of Africa by imperialists. Some of these arguments have found haven in the mouths of many not because of their kind-heartedness and forgiving spirits, but because the urge to join the international bandwagon has become irresistible partly due to financial gains and other factors.

    In the midst of the seemingly international community’s negative perception of the death penalty, Nigeria must be commended for its courage in making its official position known to the United Nations to the effect that Nigeria will continue to apply the death penalty in its criminal justice delivery system. Playing the cards plain and sincere was the best thing the federal government could have done on the issue.

    The position of the federal government admits of no fault in view of the need to consider the Nigerian context critically before keying blindly into some international resolutions. Any international position on issues of this nature must not be absorbed hook, line and sinker unless such position has been tested with the local country situation and found to be of potential benefit to the polity. As far as this issue on death penalty is concerned, the making of a positive move towards the abolition of the death penalty or doing something similar to that will only encourage more potential criminals and increase the crime wave in the society, the fact that the application of stiff penalties (including the death penalty) have not deterred many individuals from committing heinous crimes is a pointer to the fact that if such penalties are abolished, the sky would be the stepping stone for some criminals.

    The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (As amended) clearly recognises the death penalty as a form of punishment. The Supreme Court of the land has also accorded judicial imprimatur to the validity of the death penalty as a valid form of punishment under the Nigerian Criminal Justice system. What more?

    The clamour for the abolition of the death penalty is not a bad one after all. However, it is too early at the moment for Nigeria to make a positive move in that direction, the ever increasing rate of terrorism, kidnapping and armed robbery will make such a move a countrywide suicidal mission. While a future policy change on this may be productive, it is safer for the country to continue to retain its current position on the issue.

    • Vincent Adodo, Esq.

    Ilorin