Tag: caution

  • ‘Caution your husbands’

    The wife of the governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Oyo State, Mrs. Angela Folarin, has urged women to caution their husband against thuggery.

    Mrs. Folarin spoke yesterday after collecting her Permanent Voter Card (PVC) at the office of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Akanran, Ona-Ara Local Government Area.

    According to her, no political office seeker will allow his child to be a political thug or get involved in any activity that would cause violence and disorder in the state.

    She said there was a need to maintain a peaceful atmosphere before, during and after the  general elections.

     

     

     

    Mrs. Folarin advised community leaders and traditional rulers to stop their youth and children from being used by politicians.

  • General elections: Need for caution

    SIR: History being a body of facts of past events is supposed to be guide to the present. History, it is often said, repeats itself. However, one significant repercussion of history repeating itself is the higher cost attendant to that repetition.

    The unfolding melodrama of election date shift is very instructive and when such incident is placed side by side with what happened before with similar similarities, one may be able to decipher what may likely be the result.

    Therefore, we need to do some excursions into the past.

    The rigging of the 1964-65 elections in the former Western Region in Nigeria became the precursor of the 1966 coup and its aftermath led to the avoidable Civil War in Nigeria. The costs in terms of financial and human resources, the massacre of innocent Nigerians as well as the attendant internal emotional disharmony and psychological trauma of that era must never be contemplated or repeated. Some of the people who ignited the unfortunate saga paid for their crimes but the majority of the people who suffered were innocent.

    The Gowon era in Nigeria was the most glorious. After the Civil war, General Yakubu Gowon introduced the Reconciliation, Rehabilitation, and Reconstruction policy popularly known as 3RS. It was the era of mass reconstruction and development. General Gowon through Professor Adebayo Adedeji brought National Development Plans which were properly supervised. Gowon promised to handover to an elected government in 1976. Sometime in 1974 Gowon reneged on his promise and declared that 1976 was no longer realistic. That marked a turning point and Tai Solarin wrote an article titled “The Beginning of the End” and so it was with Gowon which the end of Gowon came in 1975. Those who spearheaded that saga had their fingers burnt.

    Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida (IBB) ran the affairs of Nigeria for eight years from August 1985 giving himself a coup as a birthday gift. He made use of many Nigerian good brains and evolved a culture of political sagacity. He adopted the two party system and Option A4 for elections. Babangida’s end finally came with the annulment of the June 12, 1993 elections. Adjudged to be the freest, most credible and most peaceful, the MKO/Kingibe ticket beat all centrifugal forces – religious bigotry, tribal animosity, north-south dichotomy and all embers of disunity. It showed that Nigerians could and can live in peace and can make choices of their own when allowed. A group of wicked people who never meant well for this nation scuttled that progress.

    From the historical facts above, one comes into unassailable conclusion that those who reneged on their promises have always had an unenviable end: Gowon, Babangida and this may extend to anyone else. Obasanjo was able to survive in 1979 when he handed over as scheduled. Nigerians even had to call him back in 1999 and he only missed the repercussion of backsliding when he quickly retraced his steps when some sycophants were urging him on for a third term.

    Our current crop of leaders will do well to learn from the above.

     

    • Olusegun Olatubosun,
  • ‘Oyo PDP chieftain calls for caution’

    ‘Oyo PDP chieftain calls for caution’

    A Chieftain of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), in Oyo State, Alh. Adebisi Olopoenia has cautioned the leader of the party in Eruwa, Chief Moses Fagbohun who recently stated in an interview that  Seyi Makinde was the best governorship aspirant in the party.

    Olopoenia is a stakeholder in Ibadan North East Local Government where Makinde hails from.

    He told reporters in Ibadan, the state capital, that Fagbohun should not have uttered such statement because it is capable of causing disunity among the governorship aspirants in the party.

    “As an elder, he should not have said one governorship aspirant is better than the other because it could cause crisis and bring about disunity within the party. If any of the aspirants are giving him anything to solicit for his support, he should have keet his view to himself and wait for the party’s primaries coming up on December 8. I wonder why he was comparing Makinde with other aspirants, insisting one has better electoral value than the other.

    “We have several governorship aspirants in the race. Why should he be condemning the others; it doesn’t justify Chief Fagbohun as a good leader of the party. He was at the declaration rally of former Governor Adebayo Alao-Akala and he saw the large crowd that turned out to support him, whereas he wasn’t at Makinde’s to know his electoral value,” he said

    Olopoenia noted that Chief Fagbohun is not a mainstream member of the party because he travels abroad most times.

    He added: ”He stays in Eruwa for two weeks and travels abroad for four months. So, I wonder how such person will know the best governorship aspirants in Ibadan?”

  • Eagles’ preparation for World Cup: Bosso, Ochiagha caution Keshi

    Eagles’ preparation for World Cup: Bosso, Ochiagha caution Keshi

    A Former Flying Eagles Head Coach, Ladan Bosso, on Tuesday advised Stephen Keshi to be cautious of decisions that might affect his team’s preparation for the FIFA 2014 World Cup in Brazil.

    Bosso spoke against the backdrop of Keshi’s decision to exclude Osaze Odemwingie and Ike Uche from the Eagles’ World Cup squad. He told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja on telephone that the exclusion of the players could be a blessing in disguise for the country as it prepares for the World Cup.

    According to Bosso, Keshi should use the Mexico friendly to find a replacement for both players and others who may not be fit to represent the country in Brazil.

    “We still have enough time to try more players. If any player is not measuring up to the expectation of the coach, then, there should be room for more invitation. The coach has been working with the team and we all know that the team has been succeeding without those players.

    “If I am the coach of the team, I will be conscious of what I am doing. However, it depends on the tactical approach of the coach, especially orientation and re-orientation of the team to enable it perfect every strategy for the World Cup,’’ Bosso said.

    He urged Keshi not to to be influenced by anybody or group.

    On his part, Emma Ochiagha, Vice-Chairman of the Imo State Football Association urged Keshi to use the Mexico friendly to perfect strategies and tactics ahead of the World Cup. He urged the team to exhibit the same standard it exhibited in the 2-2 draw recorded against Italy in an earlier friendly, noting that the Eagles can match any team.

    “We don’t have time to test more players; it is now a question of blending the players we have and then fine-tuning our strategies and tactics, that is what Keshi should be doing now. When you look at the performance of Victor Moses, there are fears that we need better strikers that can fit into his position because he is not doing much in Liverpool now.

    “This is worrisome to any sports person in Nigeria. But that does not mean that everybody will be tried for some of these replacements; there is no time for that,’’ Ochiagha said.

    He, however, expressed regret over the exclusion of Ike Uche from the squad after he played a major role in Nigeria’s qualification for the World Cup.

    “I don’t know why we reward people who worked for us with negative things. This is a player who worked very hard for us to qualify and at this point in time he is being found not worthy to go to the World Cup.

    “I am not in support of that, Ike Uche has a role to play and he is doing well in his club; I don’t know why he should not be allowed to play,’’ Ochiagha added.

    NAN reports that the Super Eagles will take on Mexico national team in an international friendly on Wednesday at the Atlanta Dome, Georgia, U.S.

    Both teams are expected to use the encounter as a buildup for the World Cup which will hold from June 12 to July 13 in Brazil.

  • A lunch date Jonathan should have granted with caution

    A lunch date Jonathan should have granted with caution

    Health experts believe that people eat for two reasons: for pleasure and to assuage hunger. In African setting, eating together is a symbol of truce where warring parties are involved. That is why supporters and admirers of President Goodluck Jonathan and former President Olusegun Obasanjo must have rejoiced when the two statesmen had lunch together at the presidential villa penultimate Friday, after bouts of verbal exchange.

    Jonathan would most probably not be anywhere near his present position without Obasanjo’s influence. His fortuitous emergence as the Bayelsa State governor, vice president and president were all made possible by Obasanjo’s political influence. He was minding his business as the deputy governor of Bayelsa State before the former governor of the state, Diepriye Alamieyeseigha, jumped bail in the UK after he was arrested by the Metropolitan Police for money laundering. The then President Obasanjo, who was in the heat of his anti-corruption campaign, piled pressure on the Bayelsa State House of Assembly to impeach Alamieyeseigha, paving way for Jonathan to step in as governor.

    It was also Obasanjo who nominated Jonathan as the late President Umaru Yar’Adua’s running mate. As fate would have it, Yar’Adua died midway into his first term, and Jonathan fortuitously became the president. And while Jonathan dilly-dallied on declaring his interest in vying for the presidency after serving out Yar’Adua’s tenure, Obasanjo came out and publicly urged him to throw his hat in the ring, in spite of the zoning arrangement in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). In the ensuing battle for the presidential ticket of the party, Jonathan defeated the consensus candidate of the North, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, before going on to win the election.

    In a clear instance of the instability of human relationships, Obasanjo and Jonathan fell apart after the former publicly criticised Jonathan’s handling of the destructive activities of the Boko Haram sect in the northern part of the country. At the 40th anniversary of Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor’s call to ministry at the Word of Life Bible Church, Warri, Delta State in November last year, Obasanjo had carpeted Jonathan for not deploying soldiers to invade the towns that harboured members of the sect and crush them like he (Obasanjo) did in Odi and Zaki Biam in Bayelsa and Benue states respectively after some militant youths in the communities allegedly killed policemen and soldiers deployed there to keep the peace.

    A few days later, Jonathan seized the opportunity of an interview he had on national television to dismiss Obasanjo’s invasion of Odi as nothing, but a monumental failure because the soldiers who invaded Odi only succeeded in killing and maiming innocent souls, while the real culprits escaped. From then on, both parties seized every available opportunity to throw words at each other before the surprise lunch they had together at the Presidential Villa.

    As would be expected, many supporters of Obasanjo and Jonathan hailed the development as an end to the feud between them. But the more discerning of Jonathan’s supporters, who are familiar with the antecedents of Obasanjo in such matters, have reasons to panic. A reputation for which the former president would never be found wanting is his ability to turn a lunch date with his political foe into regrettable moment. So recurrent is this aspect of his political life that observers now say he who Obasanjo wants to punish he first gives dinner.

    And instances of this abound. In January 2005, a lunch date supposedly designed to reconcile Obasanjo and the then PDP Chairman, Audu Ogbeh, became the latter’s albatross. Obasanjo had fallen out with Ogbeh over a letter Ogbeh wrote, accusing the presidency of worsening the political crisis in Anambra State. After several meetings were convened by party chieftains to reconcile the two, Obasanjo rode in the same vehicle with Ogbeh to the latter’s house where they feasted on pounded yam and egusi soup. Thereafter, Ogbeh went on national television and announced that whatever misunderstanding he had with Obasanjo had been settled. Less than a week later, Obasanjo struck. He went to Ogbeh’s house and told him to resign as party Chairman.

    Before then, there had been the celebrated quarrel between Obasanjo and the late former Senate president, Dr. Chuba Okadigbo. A politician of immense political clout, Okadigbo had carried on his leadership of the Senate with little or no deference to Obasanjo, a situation that provoked a kind of personality clash between the two statesmen. After a series of quiet but bruising confrontations, a truce was brokered between them, following which Obasanjo was on hand to commission a new residence that was built for Okadigbo. At the commissioning ceremony, they had dinner together and Obasanjo even danced with Okadigbo’s wife. A few days later, Obasanjo brought his training as an engineer to bear by engineering Okadigbo’s impeachment and the then Senate president was removed.

    Other politicians who have suffered the similar fate in Obasanjo’s hand include the immediate past governor of Ogun State, Otunba Gbenga Daniel, and former vice president, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar. After a serious disagreement between Obasanjo and Daniel over the latter’s successor, some Yoruba elders decided to intervene as Jonathan prepared to take his campaign train to the South West in the build-up to the 2011 presidential election. Consequently, the Yoruba elders, including Chief Afe Babalola; Chief Kessington Adebutu; Chief Kenny Martins; the Olubara of Ibara, Oba Jacob Omolade; and former governorship aspirant of the party, Dr. Femi Majekodunmi, stormed Obasanjo’s residence with Daniel and supposedly worked out a truce. Daniel was said to have prostrated for Obasanjo who, in response, declared that his sins were forgiven. And to demonstrate the fact that he had truly forgiven Daniel, Obasanjo reached for his pocket and brought out a kolanut which they shared and ate. Today, Daniel is like a fly caught in the spider’s web as he fights the battle of his life with forces that owe their existence to the former head of state.

    The emergence of the presidential campaign posters of the Jigawa State governor, Sule Lamido, and his Rivers State counterpart, Rotimi Amaechi, days after Jonathan and Obasanjo had lunch in Aso Rock, is seen by many as a concomitant of the incident. Any need for more proofs?