Tag: CCT

  • Saraki disowns suit against CCT

    Saraki disowns suit against CCT

    Senate President Bukola Saraki yesterday dissociated himself from a suit initiated by Timipa Jenkins Okponipare at the Federal High Court, Abuja seeking to restrain the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) from proceeding with his trial.

    In a statement by his lawyer, Mahmud Magaji (SAN), Saraki said he has never instructed Okponipare to institute such a suit on his behalf.

    The statement reads: “We do not know the complainant in the purported case. Dr. Saraki has not instructed any lawyer to file a suit in the Federal High Court, Abuja, or any other court, wherein a purported issue of fundamental human rights to challenge the case before the CCT was filed. We hope the reported case is not arranged to target the decision which the CCT is billed to deliver tomorrow (today) concerning the competence of the Tribunal chairman, Mr. Danladi Umar, to continue presiding over the Saraki case.

    “We call on members of the public to know that Dr. Saraki will explore all legitimate avenues to prove his innocence of the charges filed against him before the CCT but he will not be a party to abuse of the court process in whatever manner.”

     

  • CCT ready with verdict on Orubebe, Saraki

    CCT ready with verdict on Orubebe, Saraki

    The Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) has fixed judgment for September 21 in the case of false asset declaration involving ex-Niger Delta Affairs Minister Godsday Orubebe.

    The tribunal, in a statement yesterday, also scheduled ruling for October 5 in an application by Senate President, Bukola Saraki, seeking an order for the disqualification of the tribunal Chairman, Danladi Umar, in his (Saraki’s) trial for false asset declaration.

    The tribunal, will, on September 28, hear the case involving former Councillor from Kogi State Musa Mubeen. It adjourned to September 29 the case involving three serving permanent secretaries from Jigawa State – Zakari Umar, Muhammad Musa and Muhammad Mu’azu.

    Orubebe was tried on a one-count charge of false asset declaration. He was initially arraigned on November 9, 2015 on a four-count charge.

    He was accused of failing to declare his asset and accepting bribe. He pleaded not guilty to the charge. After some delay, the prosecution amended the charge, reducing the counts to one.

    The single count reads: “That you, Godsday Peter Orubebe, on or about June 29, 2011, while being a minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in charge of the Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this honourable tribunal, did make a false declaration of assets to the Code of Conduct Bureau when you failed to declare Plot 2057, Asokoro District, Abuja on assumption of office on September 26, 2007, and on leaving office (at the end of your tenure) on June 29, 2011, and you hereby commit an offence contrary to section 15 of Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act Cap 15 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 and punishable under section 23(2) of the same Act.”

    Orubebe was re-arraigned on the amended charge on March 8, 20176.

    The prosecution, led by former Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation (DPPF), Mohammad Diri, opened trial on April 7, by calling its sole witness, Samuel Madojemu, an official of the CCB, and its case on April 24.

    Orubebe conducted his defence on June 2, by calling two witnesses, including himself. The other defence witness was Akinwumi Ajibola, who described himself as a lawyer and managing director of Givention Properties Limited.

    The tribunal initially fixed June 30, 2016, for judgment, but later rescheduled it to September 21.

     

  • CCT postpones judgment  to July 19 in Orubebe’s trial

    CCT postpones judgment to July 19 in Orubebe’s trial

    The Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) has postponed the judgment scheduled for yesterday in the false asset declaration case against former Niger Delta Minister, Godsday Orubebe.

    The tribunal rescheduled the judgment for July 19. The postponement was informed by the absence of the tribunal Chairman, Danladi Umar, who is said to have travelled out of Abuja.

    The tribunal on June 2, this year, chose June 30 for judgment in the case involving the ex-Niger Delta minister.

    The tribunal chose the date yesterday after Orubebe concluded his defence, having called two witnesses, including himself.

    Orubebe was on November 8, 2015, arraigned on a four-count charge of false asset declaration and bribery by the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation.

    The prosecution, on March 8, this year, announced an amendment to the charge, reducing the counts to one.

    Orubebe pleaded not guilty to the amended charge of false asset declaration when he was re-arraigned.

    The single count  reads: “That you, Godsday Peter Orubebe, on or about June 29, 2011, while being a minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in charge of the Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this tribunal, did make a false declaration of assets to the Code of Conduct Bureau when you failed to declare Plot 2057, Asokoro District, Abuja, on assumption of office on September 26, 2007, and on leaving office (at the end of your tenure) on June 29, 2011, and you hereby commit an offence contrary to Section 15 of Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act Cap 15 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 and punishable under Section 23(2) of the same Act.”

    While testifying as the second defence witness yesterday, Orubebe explained that he failed to declare the plot in 2011 because he had sold it to his landlord before he made the last asset declaration while leaving office.

    Led in evidence by his lawyer, Selekowei Larry (SAN), Orubebe, who said he sold the barren plot at N10 million, explained that he also did not declare it when he assumed office in 2007 because it was not allocated to him then.

    He said the land was allocated to him by the Federal Government, as a minister, through the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) minister. He said he never visited the plot because it was in an undeveloped part of Abuja, and that he sold it to pay his rents, at N5 million per annum, for two years (2009-2010 & 2010-2011).

    He regretted that he was subjected to trial for an “empty plot of land in a bush,” which, he said, was allocated to him by the government in which he served.

    When asked by Larry why he did not declare the plot  when he assumed office in 2007, Orubebe said: “As at September 26, 2007, when I first declared my assets, I never had a property named Plot 2057, Asokoro District, Abuja. So, I could not have declared it as I was coming in as a minister.

    “On June 29, 2011, when I was temporarily disengaged from the Federal Executive Council, because the FEC was dissolved, before I was reappointed, I never also had a property known as Plot 2057, Asokoro District, Abuja. So, I could not have declared a property that was not mine.

    “As at when I was dis-engaging, I could not declare the land, because it was no longer mine. But I declared other property, including land that were given to me by the government that I served,” he said.

    Explaining how he sold the land, Orubebe said: “On June 29, 2011, Plot 2057, ordinary empty land in a bush, that was given to me by the Federal Government that I served, via an offer letter from the minister of the FCT. I decided to give it out to my landlord, Barrister Akinwumi Ajibola, the managing director of Givention Properties Limited, to settle my two years’ house rent.’’

     

  • FG faults Saraki’s fresh application on CCT chairman

    FG faults Saraki’s fresh application on CCT chairman

    The Federal Government on Wednesday faulted the fresh application filed by the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, seeking the disqualification of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) Chairman, Danladi Umar, from the Senate president’s trial for false asset declaration.

    The government, in its counter-affidavit filed against Saraki’s application by the lead prosecution lawyer, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), said the statement credited to Umar during the June 7 proceedings and on which basis Saraki was asking the CCT chairman to withdrawal from the trial, was quoted out of context.

    Saraki had filed the application through his lawyer, Kanu Agabi (SAN), on June 13, accusing Umar of making a remark showing his bias against him (Saraki) during the June 7 proceedings.

    The CCT chairman had warned the defence against employing delay tactics to frustrate proceedings at the tribunal.

    The government in its counter affidavit argued that should the CCT chairman disqualifies himself based on Saraki’s application, the tribunal would have taken over the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal in deciding the appeal.

    It noted that Umar, on the said June 7 sitting, stated clearly that “his mind is open to do justice to this matter and that he has no prejudice against any of the parties.”

    It added: “The statement quoted in the affidavit in support, allegedly made by the chairman of the honourable tribunal was quoted out of context without referring to the statement made by the chairman to the effect that his mind was open to do justice to this matter and that he has no prejudice against any of the parties.

    “Since the charge was filed on September 17, 2015, the defendant has employed all forms of delay tactics to ensure that this matter is not expeditiously heard and to frustrate the prosecution of this case.”

     

  • CCT frowns at delay by Saraki’s lawyers

    CCT frowns at delay by Saraki’s lawyers

    •Condemns inaccurate media reports

    The Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) has frowned at what it described as the delay tactics being employed by lawyers to Senate President Bukola Saraki in his on-going trial for false asset declaration.

    Saraki’s legal team consisting of about 100 lawyers, including about 10 Senior Advocates, has spent 11 days on the cross-examination the first defence witness, Michael Wetkas, and was yet to conclude.

    The tribunal has also expressed discomfort over what it called  incidents of misrepresentation of proceedings in the media.

    Tribunal Chairman, Danladi Umar, who spoke at the resumption of proceedings yesterday, said the tribunal was equally bothered by the concern expressed by the prosecution that the defence was deliberately delaying proceedings.

    At the commencement of proceedings, lead prosecution lawyer, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN) complained that the defence was unduly delaying proceedings having spent 11 days cross-examining a single witness presented by the prosecution.

    Umar said: “I am not happy at the delay tactics by the defence counsel. And I must say this thing out, that this delay tactics will not reduce the consequences the defendant will meet from this tribunal at the end of the trial if he is found guilty.”

    Lead defence lawyer Kanu Agabi (SAN) told the tribunal that the defence team was not comfortable with the tribunal chairman’s view on the allegation of delay made by Jacobs.

    “From the defence side, we are not worried about the law and facts that will be placed before this tribunal by the prosecution. But we are worried about enemies, who may wish to use this tribunal to achieve their ulterior motive.

    “As the tribunal Chairman, we love you, we respect you, but we are afraid of consequences, especially as just stated by this tribunal this morning. Our fears have been reinforced, but we pray against consequences that are against natural justice,” Agabi said.

    On the issue of misrepresentation, Umar was particularly angered by some media reports to the effect that the tribunal had adjourned Saraki’s trial indefinitely.

    “Journalists should be punished for publishing falsehood. It is a criminal offence. If I have my way I would bring back Decree 2 of the olden days to take care of the irresponsible journalists in this country.

    “How can they dare to publish that we have adjourned the trial of this defendant (Saraki) indefinitely? It is the height point of irresponsible journalism. But I thank God for them that we are in a democratic era and that is why they are doing what they are doing now.

    “They are embarking on sensational journalism to sell their newspapers at the expense of truth. That is not journalism, but a serious crime that can lead them to jail,” Umar said.

    Agabi, who agreed with Umar on the need for the media to be accurate in their report of proceedings, said he admires journalists a lot, because of their contributions to the enthronement of democracy in the country.

    He said what Nigeria needed now was peace and not Decree 2. He urged Nigerians should pray for peace rather than anything that can disturb the peace of the nation.

    Another member of Saraki’s legal team, Paul Usoro (SAN) later cross-examined Wetkas.

    Under cross-examination, Wetkas insisted that Saraki procured undeclared properties through bank loans of over N2.5billion.

    When asked if he found any economic and financial infractions in the activities of Skyview Properties Limited (a company linked to Saraki), Wetkas said: “The only thing we found out during investigation is that, both Plots 2481 and 2481 Cadastral Zone, Maitama, Abuja were residential properties, and that loans were taken by Skyview from Guranty Trust Bank to develop the properties.

    “The loan was in two tranches of N1.8billion and over N700million. When we interview the Managing Director of Skyview, he said the transactions were at the instance of the defendant, and that the property belongs to the defendant, that formed our basis of the ownership,” Wetkas said.

    When asked if he ever confronted Saraki with their findings, Wetkas said he never did.

    At this point, tribunal Chairman indicated his intention to adjourn proceedings on the ground that tribunal members had an engagement outside the tribunal premises.

    Agabi and Usoro however sought a long adjournment. Agabi said he had written the tribunal about an appointment he has with his physicians.

    Usoro also said he was engaging on a trip to Ghana. The tribunal later adjourned to June 15 for continuation of trial.

  • CCT frowns at delay by Saraki’s lawyers

    CCT frowns at delay by Saraki’s lawyers

    The Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) has frowned at what it described as the delay tactics being employed by lawyers to Senate President, Bukola Saraki in his on-going trial for false asset declaration.

    Saraki’s legal team consisting of about 100 lawyers, including about 10 Senior Advocates, has spent 11 days on the cross-examination the first defence witness, Michael Wetkas, and was yet to conclude.

    The tribunal has also expressed discomfort over what it called incidents of misrepresentation of proceedings in the media.

    Tribunal Chairman, Danladi Umar, who spoke at the resumption of proceedings Tuesday, said the tribunal was equally bothered by the concern expressed by the prosecution that the defence was deliberately delaying proceedings.

    At the commencement of proceedings, lead prosecution lawyer, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN) complained that the defence was unduly delaying proceedings having spent 11 days cross-examining a single witness presented by the prosecution.

    Umar said: “I am not happy at the delay tactics by the defence counsel. And I must say this thing out, that this delay tactics will not reduce the consequences the defendant will meet from this tribunal at the end of the trial if he is found guilty.”

    Lead defence lawyer, Kanu Agabi (SAN) however told the tribunal that the defence team was not comfortable the tribunal Chairman’s view on the allegation of delay made by Jacobs.

    “From the defence side, we are not worried about the law and facts that will be placed before this tribunal by the prosecution. But we are worried about enemies, who may wish to use this tribunal to achieve their ulterior motive.

    “As the tribunal Chairman, we love you, we respect you, but we are afraid of consequences, especially as just stated by this tribunal this morning. Our fears have been reinforced, but we pray against consequences that are against natural justice,” Agabi said.

    On the issue of misrepresentation, Umar was particularly angered by some media reports to the effect that the tribunal had adjourned Saraki’s trial indefinitely.

    “Journalists should be punished” for publishing falsehood, “it is a criminal offence. If I have my way I would bring back Decree 2 of the olden days to take care of the irresponsible journalists in this country”.

    “How can they dare to publish that we have adjourned the trial of this defendant (Saraki) indefinitely? It is the highest point of irresponsible journalism. But I thank God for them that we are in a democratic era and that is why they are doing what they are doing now.

    “They are embarking on sensational journalism to sell their newspapers at the expense of truth. That is not journalism, but a serious crime that can lead them to jail,” Umar said.

    Agabi, who agreed with Umar on the need for the media to be accurate in their report of proceedings, said he admires journalists a lot, because of their contributions to the enthronement of democracy in the country.

    He said what Nigeria needed now was peace and not Decree 2. He urged Nigerians should pray for peace rather than anything that can disturb the peace of the nation.

    Another member of Saraki’s legal team, Paul Usoro (SAN) later cross-examined Wetkas.

    Under cross-examination, Wetkas insisted that Saraki procured undeclared properties through bank loans of over N2.5billion.

    When asked if he found any economic and financial infractions in the activities of Skyview properties limited (a company linked to Saraki), Wetkas said: “The only thing we found out during investigation is that, both Plots 2481 and 2481 Cadastral Zone, Maitama, Abuja were residential properties, and that loans were taken by Skyview from Guranty Trust Bank to develop the properties.

    “The loan was in two tranches of N1.8billion and over N700million. When we interview the Managing Director of Skyview, he said the transactions were at the instance of the defendant, and that the property belongs to the defendant, that formed our basis of the ownership,” Wetkas said.

    When asked if he ever confronted Saraki with their findings, Wetkas said he never did.

    At this point, tribunal Chairman indicated his intention to adjourn proceedings on the ground that tribunal members had an engagement outside the tribunal premises.

    Agabi and Usoro however sought a long adjournment. Agabi said he had written the tribunal about an appointment he has with his physicians.

    Usoro also said he was engaging on a trip to Ghana.

    The tribunal later adjourned to June 15 for continuation of trial.

  • Prosecution witness absence stalls Saraki’s trial at CCT

    Prosecution witness absence stalls Saraki’s trial at CCT

    The absence of prosecution witness stalled proceedings in the trial of Senate President Bukola Saraki, at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) on Wednesday.

    First prosecution witness, Michael Wetkas, an operative of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), who Saraki’s lawyers had cross-examined for about 10 days, was expected to continue giving evidence in the matter on Wednesday.

    The proceedings scheduled for Wednesday was however put off by the CCT on the strength of a letter from the lead prosecution lawyer, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), informing the tribunal of the absence of its witness.

    Jacobs sought adjournment to later days because Wetkas was engaged as a prosecution witness in the trial of former Governor of Jigawa State, Sule Lamido and others before Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    The CCT, however, did not give any date for resumption of proceedings in the Senate president’s case.

     

  • Reps whittle  down CCB,  CCT’s  powers

    Reps whittle down CCB, CCT’s powers

    The House of Representatives has amended the Act setting up the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT).

    The Senate had previously stepped down the consideration of the bill due to public outcry for coinciding with  the trial of its President at the Tribunal.

    The amendments were contained in the report of a bill for an Act to amend the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act, 2004 that was considered and adopted yesterday at the Committee of the Whole House.

    Paragraph (e) was added tomSections 3 of the Act to read: “Upon complaint(s) of any breach or where it appears to the Bureau that there is a breach of the provision or this Act, the person concerned shall be given particulars of such non compliance or breaches to explain before any reference to the tribunal”.

    Accordingly, the Code of Conduct Bureau  (CCB) would no longer have powers to immediately refer a matter to the CCT, unlike what currently subsist.

    Section 1 (4) was deleted and replaced with “The Chairman and members shall serve for a term of five years subject to renewal for one further term only”.

    Section 4 (2) was also amended to substitute the word “President” with “the National Assembly” as the one to appoint members of staff of the Bureau and exercise disciplinary control over them.

    However, the House would still require the concurrence of the Senate before it could be forwarded to the President for assent.

  • Reps amend CCB, CCT Act

    Reps amend CCB, CCT Act

    The House of Representatives on Tuesday made several amendments to the Act setting up the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) and Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT).

    The Senate had previously stepped down the consideration of the bill due to public outcry that followed the move.

    The amendments were contained in the report of a bill for an Act to amend the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act, 2004 that was considered and adopted on Tuesday by the Committee of the Whole House.

    Paragraph (e) was added to Sections 3 of the Act to read: “Upon complaint(s) of any breach or where it appears to the Bureau that there is a breach of the provision or this Act, the person concerned shall be given particulars of such non compliance or breaches to explain before any reference to the tribunal.”

    Accordingly, the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) would no longer have powers to immediately refer a matter to the CCT, unlike what currently subsist.

    Section 1 (4) was deleted and replaced with “The Chairman and members shall serve for a term of five years subject to renewal for one further term only.”

    Section 4 (2) was also amended to substitute the word “President” with “the National Assembly” as the one to appoint members of staff of the Bureau and exercise disciplinary control over them.

    However, the House would still require the concurrence of the Senate that had previously stepped similar bill down before it could be forwarded to the President for assent.

     

  • Prosecution closes case in Orubebe’s trial

    Prosecution closes case in Orubebe’s trial

    The prosecution team in the trial of ex-Minister of Niger Delta Affairs, Godsday Orubebe, closed its case at the Code of Conduct Tribunal on Tuesday.

    Orubebe is being tried on a one count charge of false asset declaration at the tribunal.

    He is accused by the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) of failing to declare his ownership of a landed property in Abuja.

    The prosecution called one witness to testify against the ex-minister on Tuesday.

    The prosecution witness, Samuel Madojemu, an official of the CCB, in his evidence-in-chief on April 7 gave details of how his agency discovered a property owned by the ex-minister in Abuja which he allegedly refused to disclose.

    Madojemu said Orubebe failed to declare the property identified as Plot 2057, Asokoro District, Abuja, when he served as a minister between 2007 and 2011.

    He said Orubebe submitted five asset declaration forms to the CCB between 2007 and 2011.

    Copies of the forms were admitted by the CCT as exhibits.