Tag: centenary

  • Centenary celebration

    Centenary celebration

    What we need is sober reflection, not festivity

    Apparently, the decision of the Federal Government to celebrate the centenary of the amalgamation of Northern and Southern Protectorates of Nigeria was arrived at, without rigour. The amalgamation was a unilateral decision of Lord Lugard, representing the British colonialists, without any consultation with the indigenes at the time. The driving consideration was the economic and administrative conveniences of the colonial enterprise that he championed. Now, it is that subjugation of our people, their culture and humanity, fought against by our forbearers up to the 1960 Independence that we want to celebrate.

    No doubt, 1914 is a landmark in our colonial history. But at its centenary anniversary, what is required is a somber reflection, instead of a celebration of our subjugation by a foreign power. The share absurdity of this enterprise is a manifestation of the neo-colonialist instincts of the Nigerian leadership. Regrettably, this instinct runs deep, as majority of our past Presidents and Heads of State were at the formal launch of the year-long celebration. Unfortunately, the current President presents the anniversary as a manifestation of our common desire to stay together. Using a strange hyperbole, he likens the celebration to a centenary of a marriage, forgetting that a forced marriage is an absurdity and a nullity in law.

    The President and his compatriots, in their misplaced patriotic fervour, seek to substitute symbol for content. Yes, we agree that 1914 was the year two British protectorates were joined to form Nigeria as a nation, but will it not be fairer to ask, for whose benefit? It is even more unfair to our distinct humanity, to celebrate an act forced on us by a foreign power, despite the misgivings at the time. Or, is it possible that our leadership is not aware of the illustrious history of our various ethnic nationalities, conquered and subdued by the British military might, which culminated in the marriage that the President referred to?

    As a people, 1914 does not signpost any valour, heroism or might exhibited by our people that deserve to be celebrated. On the contrary, what we seem to be rolling out our drums for, is the culmination of the British conquest of the culture and peoples stretching from Sokoto to Eko, Ijaw to Kanuri, and several other nationalities that the conqueror eventually named Nigeria. That is why as a people we should rather be examining the intrinsic terms, conditions, liabilities and other nuances of the marriage – if we may use the presidential hyperbole – that has been foisted on us, when we were not in a position to resist. Such a reflection, in our view, will be no less patriotic, particularly considering the current challenges of our nationhood.

    This lack of reflection is also evidenced by the bogus programmes earmarked for the anniversary. Ranging from the mundane to the impossible, the organisers are promising to use the anniversary to solve major infrastructure and millennium development goal deficits that have challenged the country. While claiming that private capital will be used to actualise the programmes, the planners have promised to deliver a new city gate, a new town, hospitals, roads, scholarships, lottery and several other promises, to entice Nigerians. The range of promises and programmes have left many Nigerians wondering how a government that has failed to deliver on its promises with the humongous public funds at its disposal over the years, will now within a year, aggregate private capital to solve these deficits.

    Experience shows that what will likely happen is that this anniversary programme will be turned into a bazaar for our government officials and their collaborators. Even the tale of using private funds will not stick, as Nigerians are aware that through official policies our conniving businessmen are fraudulently enriched in order to fund programmes of their benefactor governments. Nigerians had also been disappointed in the past by policy somersaults and shenanigans by their leaders and will not be surprised if there exist subterranean budgets for some of the programmes that they claim will be privately funded. Even our National Assembly cannot be trusted not to change its mind midway, about not being ready to fund the anniversary programmes.

    To restore our national honour and self worth, we urge those presently in government to use the anniversary to galvanise a fresh start for our country. Considering our current enormous challenges as a nation, there is a need for a renegotiated Nigeria, based on our freewill and mutually agreed tenets for peaceful co-existence. If we must celebrate our nationhood, the 1960 Independence is the only worthy anniversary closest to the restoration of our dignity and agreement to live together. The hallmarks of the colonial period should be left for the colonialists to celebrate.

     

     

     

     

  • Centenary Celebration Flag-off

    Centenary Celebration Flag-off

  • Afenifere chieftain: Centenary celebration not necessary

    Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG) chieftain Mr. Dipo Famakinwa has objected to the proposed centenary celebration, saying that it lacks justification.

    He told our correspondent in Lagos that Nigeriia has not become a nation, since it was forcefully amalgamated by Lord Fredrick Lugard in 1914.

    Famakinwa said the celebration may become another jamboree, urging Nigerians to reject the proposals.

    The ARG chieftain wondered why the federal government was planning to devote its time and energy to funfair at the expense of governance for nine months.

    He argued that, if Jonathan Administration had lived up to expectation, Nigerians would have been enthusiastic about the celebration.

    Famakinwa lamented the lack of focus by the government, adding that the President who had ruled out a Sovereign National Conference was proposing a celebration of imaginary unity.

    He said: “What is Nigeria celebrating at 100? Is Nigeria a nation or nation-state? Are we living in peace,unity and harmony? Instead of discussing the basis for peaceful co-existence, government is proposing a jamboree. We need to tell the President that centenary celebration is not the answer to the problem of under-development in Nigeria”.

    Famakinwa urged the President to reflect on the prediction by an international agency that the country may disintegrate, if certain measures are not taken.

    He added: “The answer lies in the convocation of a national conference to resolve the outstanding issues gernmane to peaceful co-exixtence”.

  • Anyim: centenary celebration not to promote PDP administration

    The Secretary to the Federal Government (SGF), Senator Anyim Pius Anyim, yesterday highlighted the benefits of the Centenary celebration, stressing that it would boost employment.

    He said the proposed Abuja Centenary City project would provide jobs on a large scale.

    Anyim dismissed insinuations that the celebration is designed to shore up the image of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the President Goodluck Jonathan administration ahead of the 2015 general election.

    The former Senate President said the focus is the consolidation of the unity of Nigeria.

    He said: “In the next two months, we shall start celebrating Nigeria, not any administration. We will celebrate Nigeria as our collective destiny. We are holding consultations with the stakeholders. In February, we will aggregate the views. The grand finale is January 2014, but we are starting in 2013. The event is not to celebrate government. It is private sector-driven. However, government will fund its participation in it.”

    Anyim, who was in Lagos for meetings with stakeholders on the project, allayed fears about power outage and insecurity during the celebration.

    He said: “In the next few weeks, power generation, distribution, management and payment of bills will leave the hands of the government. Companies that won the bids have been announced and the private sector will keep power supply steady.”

    The SGF said insecurity would not pose a challenge to the celebrations, warning against unnecessary exaggeration of the security situation.

    Said he: “The challenge of insecurity, particularly terrorism, is not peculiar to Nigeria. Our country, which overcame civil war, militancy in the Niger Delta and the menace of hoodlums in Lagos, will resolve the Boko Haram insurgency.”

    Noting that the celebration is coming at a time when an international agency had predicted that Nigeria would disintegrate in 2015, Anyim said the citizens should prove the agency wrong by concretising its unity and harmony.

    He added: “We are in a transformational era and the element is a radical departure from the past. The celebration will be a major milestone in Nigeria. We have been chided by the rest of the world. Though we are the largest and most educated in black Africa and our youths are innovative, the train of growth and development has been slow. It behoves the leadership to have the vision and mission to move the nation forward. This is the mission of the Jonathan administration.

    “The forces of disintegration are trying to divide Nigeria. We must find a unity of purpose. Religious, cultural and political differences must be set aside through cultural fusion. Let us use the celebration to bring out the valuable assets of Nigeria.”

    Anyim explained the import of the Abuja Centenary City, which he said would occupy 1,000 hectares. He said the residual components would be 20 per cent, adding that this would prevent its regression into the status of a ghost city. He also said it would be a commercial, technological and tourist centre worthy of pride, adding that the proposal would attract 15 billion US dollars investment.

    Anyim said the success factors would be a free trade zone, duty free regime, tax holiday, chartered status, offshore status, efficient infrastructure and security.

    He added: “Total government commitment to provide a conducive environment in the city is imperative for the success of this important initiative.”

  • Jonathan’s 2014 centenary celebration request splits Reps

    Members of the House of Representatives yesterday debated a request on Nigeria’s proposed centenary celebration.

    President Goodluck Jonathan had written the House asking for an interaction with the lawmakers on the programme of the celebration as proposed by the Executive.

    The proposed celebration is to mark the 100 years of the amalgamation of the Northern and Southern protectorates.

    House of Representatives members were of the opinion that the celebration would be a huge waste of the country’s scarce resources and that besides, the President has no basis for the request due to his refusal to brief the House on the state of security in the country as requested by the House in an earlier resolution to the Executive.

    The debate began following the presentation of the letter from the President by Speaker Aminu Waziri Tambuwal.

    The letter dated January 10 requested the House to permit the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Senator Anyim Pius Anyim, to inform members of the preparation for the centenary celebration so far.

    Deputy Minority Leader, Sumaila Kawu (Kano/ANPP), noted that the letter was a breach of privilege of the House since President Jonathan refused to honour invitation from the House last year.

    “Mr. President refused to honour our invitation in the past. So we cannot honour his own too,” he said.

    He was supported by the Minority Leader, Femi Gbajabiamila (Lagos/ACN), who condemned the proposed centenary celebration, describing it as “an economic drain.”

    He said the House should shun the proposal from the Presidency as a response to the President’s ‘refusal’ to appear and brief the House on the issue of security as resolved by members last year.

    Said he: “A centenary celebration could cost this country billions. If we are saying there is no money to implement budgets, I don’t see why a centenary celebration should be a priority.

    “Respect should be reciprocal. We should ignore the letter the way he ignored our resolution last year summoning him to brief us on insecurity, because respect begets respect.”

    Some lawmakers saw Gbajabiamila’s position as extreme.

    Emmanuel Jime, (Benue/PDP),expressed the need for positivity regarding the centenary celebration, saying it’s an opportunity to showcase the country’s unity.

    But Abike Dabiri-Erewa (Lagos/ ACN) differed.

    She noted: “There is no big deal or an issue to be made out of the decision by the Presidency to mark 100 years of our unity.”

    Linus Okorie (Ebonyi/PDP) cautioned the House on its hard stance, saying: “The House should not constitute itself as an opposition against the presidency on every issue.”

    The Speaker postponed the debate after advising members to be restrained and await another period when they would be opportune to take a decision on the request.

  • Nigeria’s centenary and poor reading of history

    Nigeria’s centenary and poor reading of history

    Like everything else about Nigeria, government policies and programmes are designed usually by a brain trust or snickering policy wonks and either rammed down the throats of the people or railroaded through a squirming but ultimately conniving legislature. Fuel subsidy removal policy, renaming of universities, toll gate erection or destruction, Malian adventure, and now, a most inconceivable centenary project, are just a few bewildering examples. Last year, during his visit to Trinidad and Tobago to attend that Caribbean country’s Emancipation Day celebrations, President Goodluck Jonathan disclosed that Nigeria would be marking its centenary. It is not certain where the idea came from, considering that that anniversary, with its deprecatory Lugardian connotation, had never really been marked with anything resembling pomp and circumstance.

    But having announced it, and even invited his host, Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar of Trinidad and Tobago, to the celebration, it became an imperative for Jonathan and his unwilling countrymen to remember Lord Lugard’s amalgamation feat in a grand manner. And with that self-abasing decision, the semantic line between Nigeria’s amalgamation and Trinidad’s emancipation became blurred. After all, they both end in ion, and they are first and foremost objects for national mafficking. That one is pejorative and the other ennobling was inconsequential to the decision.

    Only three days ago, during a church service to mark the Armed Forces Remembrance Day, Jonathan was still bemoaning his countrymen’s misreading of Nigerian history simply because critics spoke pessimistically and derisively of Nigerian leaders. A few days after the president delivered his misplaced homily on age and divorce, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator Anyim Pius Anyim, was in Lagos reiterating the preparedness of the government to inspire the celebration of the 1914 amalgamation, a date when Lugard, without consulting the ‘natives’, forcibly merged the Northern and Southern protectorates. But afraid to be tagged a spendthrift government, especially at a time of mounting economic turmoil and spiraling debts, Anyim says the celebration will be private sector-driven.

    But even if the money can be found at no cost to the country, what of the idea behind the celebration itself? Does it make sense? Is it ennobling to celebrate a colonial idea whose consequences have proved so denigrating and so troubling? If we embrace amalgamation and elevate it unquestioningly as Jonathan’s government is doing with a year-long celebration, why shouldn’t we also celebrate the Berlin Conference (Congo Conference) of 1884-1885? It is truly shocking that the Jonathan government shows a very poor understanding of Nigerian history. Not only does it fail to appreciate great historical events that have shaped the country and its people for ill or for good, it also woefully fails to understand its many nuances, its many subtle but cataclysmic twists and turns. No one has business presiding over the affairs of Nigeria who doesn’t know the country, its past, its cultures, and its hopes.

    Trinidad and Tobago quite sensibly celebrates Emancipation Day. If we go ahead to celebrate amalgamation, we would be incontestably foolish. If the Jonathan government needs a national celebratory distraction, it should ask historians to fetch one or even a dozen for it. Surely, our historians can find a great, noble, uniting and inspiring event in our history around which our pride could coalesce. We hope this obstinate government is not too proud to back down from subjecting us to international ridicule, ridicule so deep and profound that it gives the unsavoury impression Nigerians never went to school, and didn’t study history; or that if they did, they were too dimwitted to gain profitable knowledge.

     

     

     

  • Government College,  Bida centenary

    Government College, Bida centenary

    For two days early December last year, Government College, Bida, where I had my secondary school education between 1965 and 1969, celebrated its centenary. As you can imagine it was a great homecoming for many of the students of the school which, by sheer longevity alone, has produced some of the most pre-eminent citizens of this country.

    The celebration was prefaced by the sad and sudden demise of one of the school’s most eminent old boys, Ambassador James Tsado Kolo, Waziri Doko. JT, as his friends called him, was among the pioneer senior staff of North West State, today’s Kebbi, Niger, Sokoto and Zamfara states. A humble, diligent and upright gentleman, he rose to the rank of permanent secretary in the old state and eventually served as the Secretary of the Niger State Government before he ended his civil service career as an ambassador.

    Ambassador Kolo was billed to deliver the keynote lecture about the journey to date of his alma mater on the night of December 7, the first day of the celebration, and had indeed prepared his paper. He died at 74, apparently from heart failure, a little over two weeks before the lecture and a day after the very day the centenary organising committee put out the first newspaper advert announcing the programme of the event.

    In the end it fell on his old teacher as a secondary school student, Professor Jonathan O. Ndagi, himself one of the most eminent educationists in the country and pioneer Vice-Chancellor of the Federal University of Technology, Minna, to deliver the lecture. The occasion was chaired by former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Alfa Modibbo Belgore, who though not an old boy, had sentimental ties to Bida as the closest childhood friend of Alhaji Umaru Sanda, the late Etsu Nupe, whose late father, Alhaji Muhammadu Ndayako, was one of the emirs in the North to plant the seed of Western education in the otherwise conservative and hostile region.

    As you’ll expect Ambassador Kolo’s history of his alma mater was full of reminiscences about the good, but at times not-so-good, old days of diligent and stern teachers, simple but delicious meals, notably nyanboci, the Nupe staple food of tuwon shinkafa served with bean soup or gbegiri soup as the Yoruba with their affinity with the Nupes, would call it, and of the senior boys all too often lording it over their juniors, etc.

    The one thing Chief Obafemi Awolowo, the pioneer premier of Western Nigeria, was justly famous for was his policy of free education in his region. In a sense his Northern compatriot, Sir Ahmadu Bello, was one better than the chief; JT Kolo and his fellow pupils not only enjoyed free education, they were actually paid to learn. For, in addition to free tuition, primary and secondary school pupils in the North right up to the seventies enjoyed free meals and free uniforms, and received allowances which were princely sums in those days. Such was the great store the great Sardauna put on education and such was the strength of the momentum of his legacy.

    As the college celebrated its centenary its good old days seemed light years away. Although academically it was not in the premier league, to use a football metaphor, it produced a few odd brilliant students that went on to set academic records in other schools. One such student was Malam Yunusa Paiko whom Professor Ndagi singled out from the audience for mention in the course of reading Ambassador Kolo’s lecture. To date Malam Yunusa’s record of six distinctions in West African School Certificate examination in 1959 remains unbroken. He went on, according to Professor Ndagi, to set a similar record in King’s College, as a Higher School Certificate student where he made three straight A’s.

    Modest as the school’s academic record is, it has produced more than its fair share of the country’s most pre-eminent citizens. It holds the record as the only secondary school to have produced two military leaders of this country –Generals Ibrahim Babangida and Abdulsalami Abubakar – both of them Class of ‘62. The same class has also produced the single highest number of senior military officers in the country. These officers, with the exception of Colonel Sani Bello who was retired as military governor of Kano State, left the military as major-generals. These were Muhammadu Magoro, now a senator, Muhammed Gado Nasko, a former minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Sani Sami, the current Emir of Zuru in Kebbi State and the late Mamman Vatsa, he too one time FCT minister. Another exceptional classmate of theirs was Garba Duba who retired as a three star Lieutenant-General.

    The trail blazer for them all, however, was Lieutenant-General Muhammadu Wushishi who was their senior by two years. Along with the late Colonel Ibrahim Taiwo, the military governor of the old Kwara State who was killed in the coup attempt against General Murtala Muhammed in 1976, and late Col Garba Dada Paiko, they were the first to be enlisted into the army by their old teacher, Alhaji Tako Galadima, as Nigeria’s first minister of state for the army.

    The military, however, was not the only sector in which the early products of the school proved their mettle. In the judiciary, broadcast, banking, bureaucracy, academia, and among traditional rulers many of its students have come to occupy prominent positions. In the judiciary, for example, a recent former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Idris Legbo Kutigi was a student (Class of ’54) and its head boy. Then there was Justice Abdullahi Mustapha, one time president of the Federal High Court. Again there is the current Chief Judge of Niger State, Justice Jibrin Ndajiwo, and before him a few other chief judges. This is not to mention many serving judges at various levels of that arm of government.

    Among traditional rulers the school has produced the late Lamido of Adamawa, Sarkin Sudan of Kontagora, Alhaji Sa’idu Na Maska, the longest serving emir of Lapai, Alhaji Muhammadu Kobo, who was both student and teacher in the school, the current emir, Alhaji Umaru Bago II, the late Ohinoyi of Ebiraland, Alhaji Muhammed Sani Omolori, the current Sarkin Zazzau of Suleja, Alhaji Awwal Ibrahim and Sarkin Sudan of Wurno, Alhaji Shehu Malami.

    Several of these old boys, along with some of their teachers, notably Professor Ndagi, Sheikh Ahmed Lemu – now famous for his hard hitting speech during the submission of the report of his presidential committee that investigated the 2011 post-election violence – the late Professor Albert Ozigi, also a prominent educationist, and the ageless Malam Iliyasu Bida who is most likely in his eighties but is always looking 60, came up for award on the second day, December 8, of the centenary.

    Of the seven categories of awards on that day, the most interesting and telling for me was the Special Award that went to two of the school’s pioneering students – both of them females. Telling because, first, mixed schools were rare, if not unheard of, in these parts at that time. This apparently explains why the old boys of the school who initiated the establishment of their association in October 1975 chose to name it Bida Old Students Association (BOSA). Second, I thought the award was interesting and telling because the elderly Hajiya Jibabatu Mohammed, who, of the two recipients of the award, was present in person to receive her award, spoke such perfect English in accepting her award you would be pardoned if you thought she attended some of the best schools in England; you would never imagine that all she got was Middle School education between 1945 and 1948, when the school’s status as mixed came to an end.

    Certainly, it would make you wonder whatever happened to Western education in the country, especially in the North which had been a laggard in that field.

    However, even by the school’s rather modest academic performance, the last result of its WAEC was exceptionally dismal; out of 200 of its students who sat for the exams in June, less than half a dozen had four credits and above.

    All stakeholders in the school – students, teachers, parents, old boys and the state government – must share in the blame for the terrible decline of the college. But the least blameworthy are the old boys for the simple reason that under the chairmanship of Col Sani Bello, BOSA has done virtually all that any group can do to restore the past glory of the college. Along with his team, he has used a judicious combination of carrots and sticks to get many of the high-net-worth old boys to rehabilitate the schools buildings, infrastructure and equipment.

    So successful was he as chairman in the last five years that the school today stands out among its contemporaries like Barewa College, Zaria, Rumfa College, Kano and Government College, Keffi, as probably the best in these three areas.

    If the old boys are the least to blame, the worst culprit must be the state government. Like most states in the country, especially in the North, education seems to be Niger State’s least priority, whatever the state authorities, going all the way to its self-styled chief servant, Dr. Muazu Babangida Aliyu, may claim to the contrary.

    And unless the state authorities begin to give primary and secondary schools their due and unless there is transparency and efficiency in the handling of what goes into the sector, things can only get worse than the dismal record of the school in recent times no matter what anyone else does or says.

     

     

     

     

  • Govt to build new Abuja City for centenary celebration

    Govt to build new Abuja City for centenary celebration

    A new city near the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja is to be built to mark Nigeria’s centenary celebration in 2014, Minister of Information Labaran Maku, said yesterday.

    According to him, the project which will be private-sector driven, was approved at yesterday’s Federal Executive Council. He spoke to reporters after the eight-hour meeting presided over by President Goodluck Jonathan.

    Nigeria, as a geo-political entity, came into existence following the amalgamation of the Northern and Southern protectorates in 1914 by the British.

    The minister said the project might take up to 10 to 15 years to be completed.

    Maku explained that the celebration is important for the country.

    He said: “The new city that has been proposed as part of our centenary celebration is entirely private sector driven. Let that be very, very clear. This is absolutely private sector driven with private sector investment.

    “All that government will do is to provide an area through the FCT, agree on a proper design and then it will be taken up completely, totally by the private sector.

    “The only government facility that will be there will be an arcade for the celebrations.”

    The Presidency also clarified the planned N2.2billion presidential Banquet Hall, saying what it intended to build is not a replacement of the old one but a multi-purpose hall.

    Minister of the Federal Capital Territory Bala Mohammed said “it is not a substitution or a duplication of what we already have as the main banquet hall which is not going to serve the purpose for which we are building the multi-purpose hall

    “The facility is a multi-purpose hall where the president will host his colleagues or other persons of similar importance when they visit the Presidential Villa’

    He also argued that “the existing banquet hall is not user friendly as there are so many components that are absent and we are trying to procure some things to add to the facilities that would be available in this proposed mini multi-purpose hall that would be close to the President’s office”

    The minister said contrary to public held view, the budget for the banquet hall was in the statutory budget of the FCT, saying that it is not true that the project was not in the FCT budget.

    “I wish to clear the misconception that we don’t have a provision in the budget and to explain that the FCT operates two budgets. One, the National Priority Budget, certainly that item is not on that. The development of Abuja can be done either from the National Priority Budget or FCT Statutory Budget.

    “It is in the FCT Statutory Budget and we have quoted all the subjects, I don’t have them up head and that is why we do the procurement and we got the no objection and everything. So, it is not true that this is not in the FCT budget.”

    On the development of the new City”, the FCT Minister said this was in line with government policy of unbundling the FCT to private initiative.

    He said about 16 companies would be investing about 4billion dollars in the development of 10 districts in the smart city.

    Also, the council approved the contract for feasibility studies for two new standard rail lines.

    Transport Minister Idris Umar said the feasibility studies which will be awarded to consultants are the Coastal rail line will take off from Benin to Sapele, Warri, Yenegoa, Port Harcourt, Calabar, Akamkpa, Ikom and Obudu cattle ranch with 673km at a feasibility cost of N334 million.

    The second rail line of 280km at a feasibility cost of N144 million and it will be from Ajaokuta through Lokoja, Abaji and to Abuja.

    He added that the scope of work to be carried out by the consultants are extensive and will include among others a detailed survey of the alignment of the tracks and also to provide a platform for a private, public partnership on the project