Tag: chairman

  • PDP leaders fight dirty over race for chairman

    PDP leaders fight dirty over race for chairman

    Leaders of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) remain divided ahead of the party’s December 9 convention.

    The convention, which is billed as the panacea for the multifarious crises rocking the party, seems to be a harbinger of another major disagreement.

    Prof. Tunde Adeniran, a chairmanship aspirant, has petitioned the party over the list of the panelists who will conduct the ward delegates’ election, saying they are Uche Secondus’ men. Secondus is also running.

    Another aspirant, Chief Olabode George, yesterday advised Caretaker Chairman Ahmed Makarfi to resign “forthwith” because “he has been severely compromised … he is already tarred and soiled in the muddy waters of partisan prejudice. He can no longer play the role of a neutral arbiter”.

    George’s campaign organisation, in a statement, accused Makarfi of destroying the PDP for personal gain.

    But Makarfi urged George not to blame his frustration on him, adding that it is because he had not done George’s bidding that he launched an attack against him.

    The statement signed by Director-General of the George Campaign, Alhaji Ibrahim K. Aliu, said: “Apparently spurred by personal ambition of contesting for the Presidential office in 2019, Makarfi is brazenly allying with a particular aspirant in the Southsouth to deliberately distort the process, muddle equity and invariably destroy the democratic process for transient personal gains.”

    “Makarfi’s action, to put it mildly, is sickening, untoward, blatantly tendentious, totally stripped of the typical moral high ground that often defines a well-meaning, God-fearing arbitrating leadership.

    “Everywhere you look, Makarfi is planting the agents of his favorite Southsouth candidate to stage manage warped and skewed congresses in an undisguised mockery of all the normative patterns of our founding fathers whose enduring forte about equity, justice and fairness is now being flung into the gutter. In a way, Makarfi is evidently resolved to repeat the farcical malady that characterised the debacle in Port Harcourt last year.

    “We have equally resolved that we will not be led along this ruinous path again. Never.”

    “Makarfi should now do the most honourable thing by walking away and face his ambition squarely. He cannot use a privileged non-elective position to wangle undue advantage to his own side. It is patently unacceptable.

    “ We need to redeem our party by being faithful to the great ideals of our founding fathers. We really believe that elders of the party across the nation should summon an emergency summit to deliberate on the right way to restrategise our party and rectify the wrongs on the ground.

    “All the elders across the zones must take it as a priority that this party can only be redeemed and restore to its winning ways when we are all sincere, genuine, and anchored on the path of salvaging righteousness”.

    Accusing George and Adeniran of crying wolf where there is none, Makarfi, in an sms to our correspondent’s enquiries, said George and a few other chairmanship aspirants mounted pressure on him to micro zone the chairmanship to the Southwest to favour them but that he resisted.

    “I have refused to do so because I don’t have the power. Only the National Executive Committee (NEC) can do that.

    “I saw a letter today alleging that five out of about 160 congress committee members are aligned to a particular candidate.

    “Assuming that is so, then how about the remaining 155 members? Who are they aligned to? They should just campaign hard to win.”

    Power brokers in the PDP may have resolved to mobilise support for Prince Uche Secondus based on some political calculations.

    A party source who spoke with our correspondent in confidence on Tuesday, said key stakeholders were of the strong opinion that a national chairman from the Southwest would easily be overwhelmed by the All Progressives Congress (APC) machinery in the zone.

    According to them, with the APC controlling five of the six states in the Southwest, it would be difficult for a PDP national chairman from the zone to make any meaningful impact in the zone.

    “More so, we can’t say for sure that we are going to retain Ekiti State, which is the only PDP state in the Southwest come 2018. So with the situation on ground, it will be politically-unwise for PDP to elect a national chairman from the Southwest,” the source said.

    Secondus defends his candidature

    Chairmanship aspirant Uche Secondus has denied that the Ahmed Makarfi-led National Working Committee is working in his interest.

    Secondus dismissed the insinuation that he was drafted into the race by Rivers State Governor Nyesom Wike and Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose.

    He said he only consulted widely by selling his candidacy to governors, former governors, critical party leaders and delegates, thereby having an advantage over others.

    The aspirant said although he vied for national deputy chairman at the botched Port-Harcourt convention, the dynamic nature of politics made him to seek the highest party office.

    He denied the allegation that the Makarfi interim leadership was working for his emergence, saying that it lacked substance.

    Secondus said while other contenders were mounting visible campaigns across the regions, he consulted underground and secured the support of those that matter in the party.

    He lamented that some aspirants decided to mount campaigns of calumny and blackmail against him because he had been ahead of them in consultation and mobilisation.

    Acknowledging the sentiments that the slot should have been micro-zoned to the Southwest, the former acting chairman said the consideration that the party should be led by a competent person who can deliver in 2019 displaced the sentiment.

    He said: “I will deliver my state and my zone in 2019 election and other leaders will deliver their states and zones, and our party will win the election.”

    Secondus said the campaigns against him were borne out of the fact that he had become a candidate to beat at the convention.

    He chided those criticising him for allegedly misappropriating party funds, saying that their allegations were unfounded.

    Secondus directed them to the party secretariat for a thorough investigation and verification from the party’s treasurer and director of Finance.

    He said he had abstained from the love of money, based on the moral instruction of his mentors, including the late Senator Melford Okilo and Pa Dappa Biriye.

    Secondus added: “I can describe myself as a founding chieftain of the party. I have been there from the beginning. I was a state chairman. I was the national organising secretary. I had served as the national deputy chairman and acting national chairman. I know the party and the challenges facing the party.”

    He described himself as the most qualified person to steer the affairs of the party, recalling that he had served as acting national chairman, following the exit of Alhaji Adamu Muazu as chairman.

    Read Also: PDP chairman poll consensus bid fails

     

  • Fayose: aspirants for chairman must unite

    Fayose: aspirants for chairman must unite

    •‘There must be shadow poll’

    Ekiti State Governor Ayo Fayose has urged Southwest aspirants for  national chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to unite before the national convention in Abuja.

    The governor noted that the region may lose its slot for the party’s national chairmanship, if the aspirants refused to work together and choose a candidate.

    He said presenting a candidate would brighten the region’s chances.

    Fayose suggested the conduct of a shadow election among aspirants to enhance the zone’s chances of winning the position.

    The governor spoke at the weekend while hosting one of the aspirants, former Ogun State Governor Gbenga Daniel, at the Government House in Ado-Ekiti, the state capital.

    He noted that presenting one contestant will brighten the chances of the zone to clinch the position on December 9.

    Daniel, who supported Fayose’s suggestion of a primary among aspirants from the zone, said he had the exposure, experience, contacts and acceptability to occupy the office and lead the party to victory in elections.

    Fayose said: “We need to get a consensus candidate from our zone to clinch the post. We should not go to the convention as a divided house.

    “I see nothing bad if we get all delegates from the Southwest to vote in a shadow election for their preferred candidate. Then, whoever emerges would be supported by all during the convention.

    “If we propose that and majority of aspirants agree, whoever does not agree would be seen as having no follower at all. I can’t work against you or your interest.

    “We have too many aspirants from our zone, and it is not only us (Southwest) that will decide who becomes the national chairman of our party. It will be decided by every member from across the country.

    “As for my position as the chairman of the PDP Governors’ Forum, I am only a voice there. Agreed that the governors will play a crucial role in determining who wins, but if I say something, I can’t force it down my colleagues.

    “It is only advisable that we get our house in order. All aspirants from our area, apart from dividing the votes in the region, are also dividing the votes in the North too. We all know that our party is the party to beat in the country.”

    The governor promised not to work against the interest of Daniel or any other aspirant in the zone or work against interest of the zone.

    Daniel said: “Fayose’s suggestion is a good idea. If our party leaders and members support it, I am ready for it. Majority of aspirants only have the experience of being political appointees. I have contested and won elections twice.

    “As a governor, you know what it is to contest and win elections. I have traversed all nooks and crannies of this country, and I am well accepted.

    “Our party needs somebody like me, who has the contacts and the experience to lead it. We are going to contest against incumbent in many states and even at the presidential level. So, we must be up-and-doing. I am assuring our members that I will lead the party to victory in coming elections.”

  • Senator advises intending travellers

    The Chairman, Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs, Senator Monsurat Sunmonu has appealed to Nigerians seeking to travel to other countries of the world to be good ambassadors of the country by shunning all vices and activities that would portray them in bad light as such portrayal would send dangerous signal about Nigeria among the comity of nations.

    The lawmaker representing Oyo Central in the Senate made the appeal as a result of increasing rate of maltreatment and deportation of Nigerians, pointing out that the government at any level cannot stop anybody from travelling abroad, provided the requirements of such visa had been met.

    According to her, instead of stopping people from travelling abroad, what the government would do is to educate and advise any Nigerian travelling abroad to understand the nature, conditions and culture of the country as well as the need to abide by the laws of the land they are travelling to.

    In a chat with reporters, Sunmonu, who was the Speaker, Oyo State House of Assembly expressed happiness that one of the bills she introduced on the treatment of gunshot victims without police reports has been helping the relevant agencies in their investigations as well as saving many innocent lives.

    She added that apart from legislative functions, she has also attracted and facilitated many projects to her constituency pointing out that, the feats recorded so far and the support of her people were enough to earn her another ticket for the Senate seat in 2019.

    She said: “We cannot stop anyone from travelling. Those in our missions have been told to look after our people abroad. But what we are also doing is to encourage Nigerians not to lose hope in Nigeria.

    “Before you travel to any country in the world, you have to obtain the country’s visa and upon obtaining such visa, there are conditions in those countries. So, if you are being caught working that means you are violating their laws. There are rules for employment visas all over. But when you engage in criminal activities, then you will be arrested and jailed.”

  • PDP chairman: Governors battle ex-governors, others

    PDP chairman: Governors battle ex-governors, others

    PDP chairman: Governors battle ex-governors, others

    Secondus gains more support

    The battle for Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chairman continued at the weekend with governors insisting on their  right to back a candidate.

    They said they might unveil their candidate before the December 9 convention.

    The governors, who have been criticised by some former governors for plotting to impose a candidate on the party, however, said their backing for a candidate would be without prejudice to other aspirants.

    They would like the party to allow the delegates to vote and determine who should lead them.

    They faulted the position of some former governors, members of the Board of Trustees (BOT), members of the National Caucus and ex-ministers who wanted behind-the-scene deals for some candidates.

    But there were indications that a former Deputy National Chairman of PDP, Prince Uche Secondus, may be the favourite candidate.

    The governors, sources said, joined issues with a former National Chairman of the party, Sen. Ahmadu Ali, a BOT leader, Prof. Jerry Gana, ex-Deputy President of the Senate Ibrahim Mantu and other leaders at the Caucus meeting of the party in Abuja.

    The foundation leaders warned the governors against impunity and taking sides in order to get the best for the party.

    But some of the governors challenged some of the BOT leaders, ex-governors and Caucus members that they brought impunity into the party which made it to lose the 2015 election.

    A source at the session said: “The governors were unhappy that the body language of the elders was tilting towards a consensus for Prof. Tunde Adeniran from the South-West.

    “They warned the leaders against ‘working to the answer’, as the case in the past. They also vowed to resist any plot to impose a candidate.”

    Ekiti State Governor Ayo Fayose was said to have been more forthcoming at the session.

    He was quoted as saying: “The governors have the right to support a candidate as party members/ leaders but all candidates should go for the election and the delegates will vote.”

    In a tactical reference to Adeniran’s candidacy, Fayose reportedly said the governors could not stick out their necks for a candidate whose ward did not even know he is contesting for national chairman.

    The source added: “A former governor of Niger State, Babangida Aliyu, also advised the session to allow the delegates to elect a new chairman for the party.”

    The governors later asked aggrieved ex-governors, BOT and caucus members to also choose their own candidates for the election at the National Convention.

    A BOT member, who spoke with our correspondent, said: “Our fears border on the fact that we may have a highly monetised national convention. These governors have London-Paris Club refund to throw at delegates to impose a candidate on PDP. We simply advise them to allow a free process instead of being parties to the contest.

    “We also have the choice either to remain in the party or quit if they have their way. The governors are not after a free and fair process, they want to hijack the party ahead of 2019 presidential race.”

    Another source said the PDP governors may back Secondus.

    A governor, who spoke with our correspondent last night, said Secondus enjoyed the support of most of his colleagues from the Southsouth, Southeast and some leaders from the Southwest.

    Secondus and other candidates may battle for the votes of Northern delegates.

    The governor said: “Most of the governors, especially those from the Southsouth and the Southeast, are trying to build consensus around Secondus who is experienced in party management.

    “We do not have time on our side as a party to put in place a national chairman who will learn on the job.

    “But we agreed that we will not impose Secondus, he has to vie for the office with other candidates. We want the delegates from all the 36 states and the FCT to elect our new chairman.

    “If at the end of the day our choice of Secondus is wrong, the delegates will decide.”

  • ‘Why Babangida is Unity Bank’s chairman

    ‘Why Babangida is Unity Bank’s chairman

    Aminu Babangida, son of former Military Head of State, Ibrahim Babangida, was appointed the chairman of Unity Bank based on merit, considering his entrepreneurial skills and capabilities.

    His vast knowledge, unrelenting gift of perception and excellent moral fibre enhanced his appointment by Unity Bank as well as ratification of his employment by Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

    This makes him the country’s youngest bank chairman ever, at 40 years. Despite his youthfulness, Aminu is blessed with a wise head on his young shoulders.

    Unity Bank nurtured no inhibition appointing Aminu as its chairman. The ex-Military President Babangida’s son looked every inch intimidating on paper, thus beating other candidates.

    Aminu exudes the common core of entrepreneurial depth, tact and other personal and social abilities, which have proved to be key ingredients of his brilliance and emotional intelligence.

  • Lagos PDP mourns caretaker chairman

    Some chieftains of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) yesterday described the death of the party’s Caretaker Chairman in Lagos State, Chief Babatunde Solanke, as shocking.

    News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Solanke died on Saturday at the Lagos State Teaching Hospital (LASUTH) after slumping at a hotel in Ikeja, the state capital.

    The deceased had scheduled a meeting with some chieftains of the party.

    He has been buried in his hometown, Abeokuta, Ogun State capital.

    NAN reports that Solanke was appointed caretaker chairman in August by the party’s national leadership, following dissolution of the state executive.

    The dissolution followed a leadership tussle between two factions in the state chapter.

    He was mandated to conduct congress to elect an executive within three months.

    A former factional Chairman of the party in Lagos State, Mr Moshood Salvador, said he was devastated by Solanke’s demise.

    He recalled that the deceased sent him a text message at 3 pm on the scheduled meeting.

    Salvador described Solanke as a gentleman, who was committed to PDP’s unity and progress.

  • Why Nigeria’s economic growth is slow, by bank chairman

    First Bank Plc Chairman Mrs. Ibukun Awosika has explained why there is slow economic growth in Nigeria.

    She said the national economy may not improve unless women empowerment is given a priority.

    Addressing the opening session of the International Law Students Association Conference at the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Awosika said statistics of gender distribution of Nigeria’s population indicate that women account for 48 per cent of the working population.

    Speaking on the theme of the conference: “Rethinking the role of women in modern day Africa,” she maintained that lack of empowerment provision for such a high number of people expected to contribute positively to the national economy, no doubt, would have negative impact on the general wellbeing of the populace.

    Mrs. Awosika said: “Almost 50 per cent business potentials of Nigeria are locked up because women were not empowered. Every Nigerian must be ready to lead right within his or her space. Women should work towards retaining values in them over a long time.”

    She noted that the society seemed to be deliberately working against giving women the needed support to operate.

    Mrs. Awosika added that as long as the status quo remains, the country may continue to record poor economic growth.

    The bank chairman noted that the long held belief that women with good economic means or career cannot keep home-front should be discarded.

    According to her, despite being married for 27 years and facing daring challenges of keeping her marriage, she said she has managed to combine effectively managing her home and career.

    She said: “I was three years old in my business when I got married. And I have been married for 27 years. You can be a successful career woman or business owner and still keep your home-front intact. Women constitute 48 per cent of Nigeria’s workforce. If that huge number is left with no meaningful contribution, economy cannot grow.

    “Women can manage business successfully, but we need to empower them. I urge you all to follow your dream with passion, the result is always big. The place of your birth is beyond your control, but what you make of your life is what matters.”

  • It was the wonderful work of God that Buhari came into office when he did -86-yr-old ex-Perm Sec Fasuan  who shares birthday with Nigeria

    It was the wonderful work of God that Buhari came into office when he did -86-yr-old ex-Perm Sec Fasuan who shares birthday with Nigeria

    Chief Oladeji Fasuan, an elder statesman and rallying point in the struggle for the creation of Ekiti State, has had the privilege of serving as the chief executive of the largest government-owned business conglomerate in the old Western Region. He has also served as a permanent secretary in the old Ondo State as well as a federal commissioner of the Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) and Chairman of Ekiti Council of Elders, among other high profile positions. Fasuan, who will clock 86 tomorrow, shares birthday with Nigeria as well as Ekiti State. The octogenarian spoke with ODUNAYO OGUNMOLA on the striking coincidence of his birthday with state and country, the struggle for creation of Ekiti State, the performance of the Buhari administration and the current cries for the restructuring of the country, among others.

    First of all, congratulations on your birthday, as you will be clocking 86 tomorrow. How does it feel to share birthday with both your country and your state?

    I thank God that I am alive and in reasonable health, because there is nobody in perfect health. As for my birthday, which comes up on October 1, it is a wonderful coincidence. I had thought that I was born on September 6, 1931 until a few years ago when I saw my father’s handwritten diary that I was born, according to him, on ‘1 Oktomba 1931’. He wrote it in his diary in Ekiti dialect.

    It is so coincidental. It is the work of God. As you said earlier, I share birthday with Ekiti and with Nigeria. It is a coincidence I never dreamt I could have, and it is the work of God, because God has a way of paying back or rewarding honest and conscientious commitment in our environment.

    Can you share with us some of your notable experiences whether at school in Christ’s School, Ado-Ekiti, Fourah Bay College, Sierra Leone or in your distinguished public service career?

    There are so many things I cherish and some of these things have been highlighted in two of my books. My life has been one of positive accidents. For example, I went to Christ’s School by accident. It was sometimes in July 1945 when I was in Elementary Four at St. Andrew’s School, Are-Ekiti that my teacher forwarded my name to (Archdeacon) Dallimore of Christ’s School to write entrance examination to Christ’s School in July, 1945. And he sent it not out of goodwill or best wishes for me. He wanted to punish me, according to him, for being at all times frivolous in the class. But the punishment turned out to be a direct blessing. So I wrote the examination in July and by August, the result came out and I came out in a unit among the Ekiti contestants. I could have ended up in Standard Six and come out as a pupil teacher but I veered off to secondary education by accident.

    Throughout my life, there have been positive accidents, so I remember them. Secondly and most importantly, I was a Director in what was then called Western Nigeria Development Corporation (WNDC), which later became Industrial Investment and Credit Corporation (IICC), Cocoa House, Ibadan. It was the predecessor of the Odua Investment that we have today. I was the number two in the hierarchy of the IICC. I was the Director of Investment, next to the Chief Executive Officer. When (Major General David) Jemibewon came in 1975 as the governor of Western State and Gen. (Olusegun) Obasanjo was in Lagos as the military head of state, he had a policy to shed what they called “excess load” in the public service, civil service proper, the parastatals, the judiciary and even the academia. Many people were let go. The criteria were old age, incompetence or lack of integrity or overstaffing.

    Jemibewon asked the chief executive to name who should go at Cocoa House, using those four criteria. And to be fair to him, he did not send my name. But later when they insisted that there must be some people who missed some of the four criteria, he then decided to send my name. But he forgot that barely six months earlier, I was promoted a director. So, Jemibewon asked him in another letter why I should go, having regards that I was promoted a director barely six months earlier. He recanted, saying that it was a mistake; that Fasuan should not go, that Fasuan was honest, that Fasuan was diligent and that there was no overstaffing. Jemibewon became violently angry and wrote that the man must go now, that the man was dishonest and Fasuan must take his place now. That was how I became the chief executive of the corporation.

    It was the first time in history when there would be no interview or no competition. For somebody who wanted to denigrate me and put me to shame, he was not only reprimanded, he was sacked and they asked me to take his place. So, I went through that kind of thing in life. The only thing I didn’t become by accident was permanent secretary because I was overdue for it. I received more than 50 telegrams, all of them saying, ‘congratulations for this belated promotion,’ because I was already on Grade Level 17 as General Manager, Ondo State Investment Corporation, which was number the one corporation by performance.

    And finally, the Ekiti State project. I started that idea in this living room in May 1991. I had retired in 1986 when I reached the statutory age of 55. But I thought what would I be doing for the rest of my life? When we got to Ondo (State), so many questions arose that made me believe that there should be a new political entity in this area. I collected a number of friends and collaborators and I was struggling for the next six years. We engaged the leadership of the Obas, led by the Ewi of Ado-Ekiti, who was barely three months old on the throne. We gave all the leadership that was required. We were six in the Western Region asking for states. Six requests, and we were going to be given only one slot.

    There were requests for Ijebu State; for Coastal State, a state along the coast from Ikorodu to Agbabu; we had requests for Ibadan State; Oduduwa State; Oke Ogun State and Ekiti State. In terms of material wellbeing, we were the least. But in terms of sheer brilliance and commitment, none of them surpassed us. So out of six, the then Provisional Ruling Council (PRC), chaired by Gen. Sani Abacha, approved our status among five other applications on the 1st of October, 1996.

    That was the climax of my public service to date and I thank God for it. It was the grand finale and not ante-finale.

    October 1 marks the 21st anniversary of the creation of Ekiti State. Have the dreams of its founding fathers been realised?

    I must be frank, there were many things that we had in mind, the first being development at our own pace, using the raw materials that abound in Ekiti State, especially human and material resources. We thought we were monolithic and homogenous; all of us were a sub-clan of the Yoruba nation. From Ikere to Efon Alaaye on this side, from Ikere to Imesi Lasigidi on the other side, no majority, no minority. This is quite different from other parts of Western Nigeria where there are four, five or six sub-ethnic groups. The Ekiti people consist of one sub-ethnic group. We had high hopes. Unfortunately, in many areas of life, our hopes have not been realised. I must be frank with you, as of today, the thing we mostly thank God for is that Ekiti is in being and that as long as there is a country called Nigeria, there will be a state called Ekiti. From that imperative, we can thank God.

    But for the records, I need to say this: one of the things that one can be proud of in the new political entity called Ekiti is the commitment of certain elements in our society in the development of the environment, and one outstanding personality in that category is Afe Babalola. The university which he built here by whatever definition and qualification is one of the rarest investments by any single individual anywhere in the world. I understand Afe had options to site it in Ibadan with free land and other beneficial variables, but he opted to install that institution in Ekiti. I think if we were still part of the old Western Region, Western State or old Ondo State, he wouldn’t have the heart or the audacity to install such a multi-billion naira institution here. So, this is one of the successes of the idea of Ekiti State, apart from himself being a substantial part of that struggle.

    The Muhammadu Buhari Administration is more than two years in office now. You are apolitical and whatever view you express now people will tend to believe you. What is your assessment of the performance of the Buhari Administration since May 29, 2015 when it came into power?

    I think one has to be very, very fair. Before Buhari came in, there was a lot of rot. There were no physical bouts; people fighting themselves rather than Boko Haram. But the Nigerian nation was on the brink. The corruption in this country had no precedent. Of course, the revelations in the last 12 months support this. The mud, the filth and everything bad is so much that it would take an angel to clean them in few years. Certainly, Buhari is not an angel just as you and I are not angels. The only thing he has above many people is commitment. Many people have high integrity as he does but few people can achieve his level of commitment. So it was the wonderful work of God that Buhari came into office at the time he came. You can see the revelations: people locking up billions of naira in kitchens, in makeshift toilets, offices, everywhere. Apart from the money they steal out of the country, only three days ago, I read in the papers that many of the property that has been seized or assessed or being proposed to be seized from the former Minister of Petroleum Resources was N70 billion. Now, there has never been a time that Ekiti has more than N2 billion as its monthly allocation. Variously we got between N1.2 billion and N1.5 billion. Imagine N70 billion traced to a single person. That is all the allocations put together for two to three years for Ekiti State. That was where we were coming from and how do you expect a human being, Buhari or whoever, to clear that rot within two years, elevate the economy, orientate Nigerians and re-orientate them again? It takes time.

    When you want to achieve something either as a politician or ordinary Nigerian, you have a list of priorities. You re-examine these priorities from time to time. What was number one yesterday could be number three today and vice versa. That is what the man is doing. I appreciate him and God will give him life to lead this country even more.

    There have been clamour for in many quarters for the restructuring of the country, especially since the Buhari Administration came to office, with some observers noting that such clamour did not arise during the immediate past administration. The question is how do we go about this issue of restructuring?

    You have raised an issue which is very germane; that why are people now raising it during the current administration? Critical question. The people who lost out yesterday are in the forefront today. Restructuring has many political interpretations, the main one being we have been marginalised, let’s weaken the Federal Government; let’s take more from the centre to the state. Two, let’s manage our own resources, for our fortunes and misfortunes; if we have some fortunes left, we donate to the centre. This is self-serving on the part of our people across the Niger.

    But our people here, they have been indoctrinated. The people in the West have become artificial socialists. When we were part of the West, development was not even; it was concentrated in what now constitutes Ogun State because we were led in large measure by technocrats and politicians from Ogun State. There was a period we had 12 permanent secretaries in the West, eight of them came from Ijebu and Abeokuta provinces. So, Ondo and Ekiti had been marginalised for all time. I repeat, Ondo and Ekiti had been marginalised. And the people crying for restructuring now, they want us to revert to regionalism. That in itself is not bad. What is bad is that they want us to knock at Ibadan before we could go to Abuja; create an intermediary administration.

    On the other side of the Niger, the reason for restructuring, which is barely one year old there, is that they think, quite wrongly, that they are being marginalised. I did my research in the last three years and I knew that prior to two years ago, clearly 72 per cent to 75 per cent of all political appointments, of all senior management appointments in all federal parastatals, particularly in finance institutions, were from South South and South East. Less than 20 per cent went to the North and less that 5 per cent to the West. There was no cry of marginalisation for six years; no cry of restructuring. Now the grapes are sour. Let us be honest with ourselves.

    There is nothing wrong with restructuring. My own idea of restructuring is that certain things that are being done and certain functions that are being done, certain constitutional issues that are attached to the Federal Government should be given to the states to handle. But to create intermediary administrations again or to try to put together two or three states ought not to happen. In the past, our eyes have seen ‘red’ in the West. Those of us from Ondo and Ekiti States, our eyes have seen ‘red’ and we don’t want to see red again.

    What of the agitations for self-determination? How do we address them, especially the latest Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) uprising and the likes?

    Well, this again emanates from selfishness. Some people have suggested that the young boys and guys clamouring for Biafra Republic are now in effect asking for separation. They are looking for balanced appointments in the Federal Government. That’s all. If Buhari today arranges a table to be surrounded by the contestants and re-divides positions among the ethnic groups, there will be nothing like that again. It’s a subterfuge, a blackmail to say we want more positions from the Federal Government. Although one has to admit that the appointments are more lopsided in favour of certain areas in the North. Taken together, all the time, it is the West that loses. The South South and South East had their days. The North is now having its day. When Obasanjo was there, he distributed things evenly, despite that, the Yoruba were not better off. Obasanjo has conscience. He didn’t concentrate appointments and resources in one particular region. That was the only interlude we had. T the others were self-serving regional administrations.

    Another issue that has occupied the public domain of recent is the issue of the National Assembly. A good number of Nigerians believe that the National Assembly is taking so much resources of the country and that the nation does not need a bicameral legislature. What is your take on this as an elder statesman?

    This is very interesting, not only do I share the view that we don’t need a bicameral legislature at the centre, I will even advocate a part-time legislative arrangement. Today, there is a gulf between what they say they earn and what they really earn. I was very much disturbed last week when I saw the Acting Chairman of the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC). I was once a Federal Commissioner there. I was one of those who sat down and devised salaries and allowances of all political office holders, from councillorship to presidency and judicial officers. There was nobody in any position that earned more than N1 million per month, all allowances put together.

    The acting Chairman of that Commission went on air last week. You could see his body language because he was talking through his nose. Excuse my language, stating the approved and recommended one by the Commission to the National Assembly. But nobody asked him, ‘Mr. Acting Chairman, these are your recommendations, but what is on ground?’ All he said, nobody earns more than N2 million, but in actual fact, the papers say they are earning more than N14 million. Some people say it is between N21 million and N24 million per month. Okay, if these figures are not so, if they are not correct, why is it difficult for them to lay their cards on the table? I keep on wondering.

    I think the President of this country or the Head of the Public Service of Nigeria honestly have the right to call on the Clerk of the National Assembly and say ‘come with your pay slip or pay sheet.’ Call the Head of the Public Service of the Federation or the President of this country should call on the ordinary Clerk of the National Assembly, lay bare on the table what your people earn. It still agonises me that is it beyond the President of this country or the Head of the Public Service to do that? I hope one day, somebody will do it. I have a fear, and it is as we move dangerously towards the brink, the number of the educated unemployed is increasing progressively. I fear that one day, one million unemployed graduates will just march on the National Assembly and sack it. That will be a tragic day for Nigeria. I hope it doesn’t happen. But the solution lies within.

    Nobody seems to be honest about it. You cannot say you are honest with the fact that the legislature is so independent and now constitutes a government within government. You cannot say it is another country by itself that cannot be held accountable. What kind of Constitution is that? That is not right. It means some of the people in the Presidency, I mean the executive, are not honest themselves. If they are honest, they will be able to say no. Let’s call this thing by its name. You this people, open your books, let us see what you earn, full stop!

    Then how can we get it right in governance in Nigeria, either in the executive, judiciary or legislature from the grassroots level to the Presidency?

    You must have been reading in the last few months what happened to the executive, prime ministers, presidents of many countries in the Americas, in South America, the Carribbeans, even the Europeans where heads of state and governors have been jailed or have been removed or impeached. A tragedy that is called Nigeria is the impunity created by presidents and governors not being accountable. What do you call it? Constitutional immunity. If a president or a governor goes about with a cutlass, cutting everybody’s head around him, nothing can happen to him. That is day one of our restructuring. Remove the immunity. Let everyone be equal under the law, then I as president or governor will know that I am not superhuman and that I am not a special creation. That I am as ordinary as every other creation on the street. Until we do that, Nigeria is not going anywhere. We are going to jump up and jump up without moving forward, because when you see what some people are doing in the North, in the East and even in the West, squandering money on the imponderables, things that are not important. So we have to re-order and rewrite the Constitution and remove the immunity clause which breeds impunity.

    As a respected elder statesman in Nigeria and in Ekiti State, you are full of experiences here and there. What would you like to be remembered for by the time your Maker calls you home?

    Broadly speaking, I will like to be remembered for what people think about me. But as far as I can see myself, I say things as they are. If there is a dispute between my own biological child and somebody from Kaura Namoda or Port Harcourt, whichever, I say things as they are. I have no double standards in my life. I am trying to raise my children in that way and I try to put it into my family members. Go straight, walk straight and talk straight. I leave it to the coming generations to decipher my life pattern and then give it a name after me.

  • A storm brews at LASU  over dismissal of lecturers

    A storm brews at LASU over dismissal of lecturers

    The sack of the chairman, vice chairman and 13 other members of the Academic Staff Union of Universities of the Lagos State University (ASUU-LASU) by the institution’s management last Friday may be the beginning of a fresh crisis in the institution. The union has vowed to take the battle further. Members of the university community are polarised over the management’s action, reports ADEGUNLE OLUGBAMILA.

    THE academic Staff Union of Universities-Lagos State University (ASUU-LASU) chapter is set  for battle with the institution’s management. It is blowing hot five days after the university management kicked out 15 of its members, including its Chairman, Dr. Isaac Akinloye Oyewunmi, and the Vice Chairman, Dr. Adebowale Adeyemi-Suenu.

    The union has also complained about their alleged harassment by LASU security officers since their dismissal.

    According to a statement signed by the university’s Acting Public Relations Officer (PRO), Ademola Adekoya, the offences of the lecturers and two non-teaching staff, who were  sacked last Friday, ranged from demanding bribes, result/grades falsification, doctoring of certificates, defaulting of conditions of their training leave bond, and dishonesty.

    While Oyewunmi, a senior lecturer in the Department of Human Kinetics, Sports and Health Education, was accused of demanding a N50,000 bribe from 2003 modular year students of Political Science Education on the sandwich programme, Adeyemi-Suenu, a senior lecturer and Acting Head, Department of History and International Studies, Faculty of Arts, was dismissed for altering the results of 12 students of the department who had already been advised by the university’s Senate to withdraw during the 2015/2016 academic session.

    According to the management, Adeyemi-Suenu also got the boot for changing the results of some final year students and stragglers outside the scope of the departmental decision, as well as awarding grade point of 2.0 to two students in an examination they did not sit for.

    Oyewunmi’s problems started last October when the management received a one-page petition titled: ‘Save our Soul petition against Dr. Isaac Akinloye Oyewunmi’, and signed by one Abiodun Adebola Jolaosho, that accused the ASUU chairman of using a front to demand N50,000 from Political Science Education students on the Sandwich Programme to process their results.

    Oyewunmi denied the allegations. In his response to management, Oyewunmi said the petition was designed to tarnish his image and that of ASUU because of the battle the union fought and won under the immediate past management.

    On Thursday, January 5, this year, the university wrote him to appear before a fact-finding panel to clear his name. A month later, the university again wrote him to appear before an investigative panel.

    Aside those dismissed, Dr. John Olufemi Adeogun, an Associate Professor, from Oyewunmi’s department, was demoted for ‘acts bordering on dishonesty’.

    The non-teaching members of staff affected were: Mr. Emmanuel Baoku Babatunde, a Senior Security Officer, who was demoted for allegedly sabotaging the university’s security operations; and Mr. Ramon Ajose Alli, a former head machine operator, who was sacked for collecting N20,000 to assist a student substitute his falsified result in his personal file with another result.

    Adekoya told The Nation on phone that the LASU management and Governing Council premised their decision on integrity of the investigative panel as well as  statements of the accused who were given a fair hearing.

    He said the management would stop at nothing to sanitise the 33-year-old institution.

     

    Workers’ reaction

    The workers are divided over the management’s decision. While some are lauding the Prof Lanre  Fagbohun-led management,  which came on board last January for its boldness in ridding the institution of perennial corruption, others see it as victimisation of the ASUU members, which they termed as going too far.

    ASUU-LASU Secretary Dr. Tony Dansu ter said Oyewunmi and Adeyemi-Suenu were still the union’s chairman and deputy, irrespective of the management’s decision.

    Dansu described the dismissal of the two union leaders as management’s tactic aimed at silencing the union for its insistence on checks and balances.

    “As much as we know, both Dr. Oyewunmi and Dr. Adeyemi-Suenu still remain our chairman and vice,” Dansu told our reporter on phone on Tuesday.

    “They (management) are not victimising Oyewunmi or Adeyemi-Suenu, but ASUU,” Dansu added.

    While Dansu could not vouch for the 13 others punished along with Oyewunmi and Adeyemi-Suenu, he defended the duo.

    He said: “I am not a member of that panel, so it will be difficult for me to say so of those people.  But as far as that of our chairman and his deputy are concerned, the union actually saw it coming. We knew it was a ploy by the management to crackdown on the union for our insistence on checks and balances.

    “Do not forget that there was a time ASUU-Lagos Zone held a briefing and raised some salient issues that management had not  address till date.

    “I can tell you authoritatively that up till the (last) Thursday sitting, Council did not deliberate on matters of our members, which bordered on discipline. It was on that day members received the report, which we believed should have been distributed to them ahead so each individual could have ample time to study it before the meeting.

    “We were also told the report on Oyewunmi, Adeyemi-Suenu and two other members were not presented in hard copy. Council simply projected it and members hurriedly took final decision on it. Imagine such a matter that ended in dismissal being treated with such levity?

    “The letter was dated Thursday, September 7; but by 10am on Friday, security officers stormed the secretariat and ordered the chairman to leave.

    “We are not saying the management has not taken their decision, but the university is a public place and the fact that you sacked a staff member does not mean he should not be allowed to move in or out of the university. Our chairman was harassed by security officers that almost prevented him from entering the university premises on Monday. The same happened to our vice chairman on Tuesday and we had to mobilise to prevent that.”

    But Adekoya denied the union’s allegations against Council.

    “The chairman of Council is a man of integrity, who would not dare do such.

    “In many organisations, except where an employee resigns, once you are dismissed, the management of that organisation will declare you a persona non grata. On the other hand, you are considered a security risk, if you force your way into such premises unauthorised.

    “For instance, Adeyemi-Suenu, disguised himself and sneaked into the premises, ran into ASUU secretariat and locked himself in. As a law-abiding institution, the management will not allow any individual to incite people to violence and that is exactly what we are doing.”

    Another source, who did not want to be named for fear of victimisation, said he did not see LASU winning the war.  He, however, said ASUU should not fight the matter in court but allow the lecturers involved to do so individually.

    “I want to say if you have looked at the history of litigations in LASU, they hardly win their cases in court and I think this one may not be too different because I suspected that the punishment against ASUU leadership was politically motivated.

    “However, I will advise that only individual members of ASUU who are convinced they were being victimised should go to court and not as a union because we suspect that some of them are actually guilty of the allegations.”

    Another lecturer, who also pleaded not to be mentioned, blamed ASUU for failing to embrace the olive branch extended by the management.

    “Ibere ija laa mo; a kii mo opin ija”, (You only know the beginning of battle, but not the end) the source said in Yoruba.

    “I can confidently tell you that ASUU is the cause of this problem because it refused to embrace the olive branch the management extended to it.

    “At the time this management came on board last year, there were lots of disenchantment and bad blood by workers, many of who had been denied their promotions and other entitlements.

    “The vice chancellor called the leadership of the unions and appealed to them to forget the past and move on. He even promised that we would all get our outstanding promotions and other entitlements, and I can tell you that as at today, management has fulfilled virtually all those promises.

    “We had to tell the leadership of our union to heed management’s advice since we have got what we wanted; but ASUU kicked, saying those who created problems under the immediate past administration must be punished. Some of those people have since been dealt with by the management are the ones who are now fighting back.

    “I heard that on Friday, one of them was driving around campus victoriously and boasting that what we have seen was just a tip of the iceberg and that more heads would roll. Many of us know it’s not the management’s fault, but those people who had been dealt with are  seeking revenge.”

    On his part, Oyewunmi said his dismissal was engineered by politics.

    “I initially did not wish to speak, Oyewunmi said in a phone call on. “But as soon as the news broke, there were flurry of calls and, at that point, I was wondering whether reporters would think I was speaking for myself or on behalf of the union. So, I decided to keep mum.

    ‘’But one thing I would say is that this issue was politically motivated. Nonetheless, ASUU is an organised body that would review the situation and react at the appropriate time.”

    On the dismissal of Alli, the machine operator, a former NASU leader in the university, who pleaded anonymity, described management’s verdict as too harsh when juxtaposed with the offence committed.

    The source said: “Management’s decision against Mr. Ali to me was too harsh compared to the allegation against him.

    ‘’They (management) said he collected N20,000 to help a student. This is a staff member who had put in 33 years into the service of LASU; that means, he actually was a pioneer staff member of this university since it was established in 1984.

    “I expected them to have tempered justice with mercy. I learnt that the union leadership initially wrote to them (management) on the issue and later we heard that the committee that sat on his case recommended termination of appointment. How that later turned to dismissal still beats our imagination.”

    Meanwhile, a group, Young Alumni Association, has praised the management for its boldness.

    Their commendation is contained in a statement signed by a former LASU Students’ Union President, Adeyemi Wasiu Onikoro, and tagged: “Dismissal of Drs. Oyewunmi, Adeyemi-Suenu and 13 other lecturers – A bold step for Nigerian universities to emulate”.

    The group urged the management not to rest on its oars until it rid the institution of all bad eggs.

    “Unsurprisingly, many LASU students have taken to the social media to applaud the university authorities while urging them to prosecute other bad eggs in the system. Their message shows frustration and relief. Their hard work must start paying off.

     

     

     

  • Lagos Assembly lauds govt over schools

    Lagos Assembly lauds govt over schools

    Chairman, Committee on Education of the Lagos state House of Assembly, Hon Lanre Ogunyemi has praised the state government for providing a condusive enviroment for smooth resumption of pupils for the new academic session in public schools.

    He gave this commendation when he led members of the committee on a visit to Lagos State Model College, Ajah to observe the resumption of schools for the 2017/2018 academic session.

    The lawmaker said they were impressed with what they saw during the surprise visit.  He said with the provision of modern infrastructure by the state government, the schools, teachers and pupils were ready for the new academic session.

    “Despite coming early and unannounced, we met the students and teachers on ground, a clear indication of their readiness for the new academic session,” he said.

    Ogunyemi also donated N300,000 to the college on behalf of his daughter, Dr. Olubukola Ogunyemi, who a former pupil of the school.

    The lawmaker, who represents Ojo Constituency 2 in the Assembly, used the opportunity to call on private organisations in the state to support the government on education.

    “We are calling on more corporate organisations and wealthy individuals to support the government in education, and look into our riverine areas to support education there,” he said.

    On Monday, many schools across the state made extra efforts to receive their pupils and get them ready for academic activities.

    To encourage pupils to show up on the first day of resumption, a teacher Oduduwa Government School, Papa Ajao, Mushin, who simply referred to himself as Mr Rahim, said they were made to write tests

    “We conduct a pre-resumption test so that the pupils can know what will be involved in the term and also introduce them to their new class teachers and new classes, as well as so many other things that can bring to success of the school”.

    Not many pupils showed up at the Ovie Children School, Mushin, a situation the head teacher, Mr. Olasukanmi Fayola, attributed to the heavy downpour.

    “Due to the heavy down pour, pupils did not show up as expected but this term is full of lots of activities that will not only build the children mentally but teach them how to be better citizens.  Everything being taught in school will be used in their day-to-day activities.

    The reverse was the case at Crown Gate Nursery And Primary School, Somolu, where Head Teacher, Mrs. Anthonia Okunlola said the turnout of pupils was high.

    “Despite the heavy downpour a lot of students turn out well to school and new students were enrolled in d school”.

    Ahead of resumption, she said the school: “renovated and decorated the classrooms… the teachers also prepared their lesson notes; and we also had meeting to discuss areas we are lacking.”