Tag: change

  • Change begins with who?

    SIR: The social reorientation campaign #ChangeBeginsWithMe launched by President Muhammadu Buhari came with mixed reactions, as some think the President is the only one responsible for the change he promised Nigerians, and some have the opinion that change is an unconditional collective task for everyone.

    Even though, President Buhari was the one that promised to bring the change, that does not mean we should not do our parts in bringing changes in our own lives for good. I agree with the theory of “Charity Begins at Home”, and the President should take this as a challenge to do more and promote the changes he wants to see in people through action.

    But, whether the President changes or not, we need to change too. Change here entails identifying what you are doing that is not right and replacing it with better option. This can be in public and private life. So, change is a personal project for everybody.

    The change we seek requires systematic and deep social changes, which entails changing norms of the people. A random act by one person can become a social norm for the entire population, and this act can be good or bad. So everyone can be a change agent. Who knows your random act might become a norm, so your action must be good always. People tend to consider and act tasks as normal behaviour when they grow up seeing people performing the task. That what makes them feel comfortable, otherwise they will feel excluded.

    Change cannot happen on its own, not without mobilizers. Change is the collective responsibility of everyone, and it cannot happen without the people. Change from worse to better, change from being unpatriotic to being patriotic, change from being irresponsible to being responsible, and change from silence to speaking, change from not doing anything to action etc. The change agents are the ones who refused to be cynical about what they can get done.

    It is now up to the people, how do we help our neighbourhood and communities? How do we spend our extra income? Do we help others live to their potentials? Have we stopped collecting that little bribe? Did we quit that ghost job? How honest are we? Do we know what our elected public leaders get and spend? How can our voices matter in governance?  Have we called our members of parliament and tell them what we want?  Have we checked on them if they are doing their jobs?  The change requires bigger actions, and the big action requires all of us. Together we can keep changing this country for the better, and this is achieved through this campaign.

     

    • Dr. Ahmed Adamu,

    Umaru Musa Yar’Adua University,Katsina.

     

  • How YALI will bring change to Africa

    How YALI will bring change to Africa

    Recently, I was among the 122 youths selected to attend the Young Africa Leadership Initiative (YALI) Regional Leadership Centre West Africa Accra Ghana for a leadership training initiated by the President of the United States (U.S.) Barack Obama to help young Africans to be exemplary leaders.

    The initiative is to promote collaboration among the African countries towards bringing a transformation on the continent. Obama believes in the zeal of the youth to drive change in a continent plagued by leadership crisis. He believes if the youth are given the necessary support, they would change the condition of their countries.

    The training brought together nine African countries, which include Nigeria, Ghana, Sierra Leone, Gambia, Liberia, Togo, Cameroun, Burkina Faso and Cote d’Ivoire. Participants were made to stay together in the same place, so that they could engage in cross-cultural discussion to appreciate their diversity.

    The training focused on specific issues that could help to bring transformation to Africa, ranging from leadership, entrepreneurship, public policy, agriculture, Information Technology and cultural diversities. We had experienced facilitators, both from Africa and the U.S., who enlightened us deeply on these different aspects.

    The two most important aspects that were emphasised are leadership and entrepreneurship. This was so, because the common problem most countries in Africa face is leadership. Attention was particularly focused on leadership, because the organisers wanted the participants to know the true meaning of leadership. To make them entrepreneurs, the participants were mentored on how to start successful business to reduce unemployment. After the training, take-off grant was given to participants who presented best entrepreneurship idea.

    It has been said that the major problem hindering development of Africa is leadership. Africa is blessed with amazing resources and climate suitable for its growth. Other continents rely on our natural resources for development. But, its leaders have cornered and converted these natural resources to personal resources.

    In the course of the training, the participants were made to understand that leadership is not about taking dominion over others. Rather, it is about helping others to become the best in the society. Leadership is about service. We were made to understand that it is not until you get to a post that you become a leader; you become a leader from the point you take responsibility for your actions and decisions to make society worth living for the people.

    Youths must understand this, because a lot of attention is now focused on them. The older generation has failed us by handing over a bad system to our generation. We need to change African story bring about transformation. But if the youth don’t have a changed and renewed mindset about leadership, how will they bring the desired change to a continent plagued by corrupt leadership? This is what YALI focused on.

    A herd of sheep being led by a lion can make a change, compared to group of lions being led by a sheep. The youth need to brace up for the challenges ahead. If the youth want a corruption-free system, it starts from their individual activities. You can’t expect a new result when you adopt old ways of doing things. If we want new results, we must be ready to adopt a new system and mechanism. The change we desire will be achieved when we change our mindset and our perspective about things.

    Leadership is about character and character is about what you are doing when nobody is looking at you. A good leader is someone who has a positive character. The corrupt leadership plaguing the continent is as a result of character of people in the position of authority. Focus of the youth must be on how to bring transformation to Africa.

    Entrepreneurship is a panacea to youth unemployment. Youths need to start thinking beyond white-collar jobs. We need to acquire relevant skills, knowledge and expertise that will help us to be problem solvers and not part of the problems. To put African economy on the right track, we need those who can think solutions to problems and not those who will only complain about the problems and do nothing about it.

    Entrepreneurs are those who think solutions to problems. They are innovators who bring new technology, infrastructures and channels that will help to make life easy. Entrepreneurs are employers of labour and the more employers of labour we have among the youths, the less youth unemployment we will have in Africa. Africa needs more entrepreneurs and this can only be done when African youths are enlightened and encouraged to go into entrepreneurship.

    Africa is an important continent and that is the reason why foreign countries believe so much in the continent. There are lots of opportunities for growth and development that can bring about paradigm shift in leadership in Africa. Soon, institutions and new innovations will be emanating from Africa as a result of YALI training. This will go a long way in bringing the needed transformation to Africa.

  • How YALI will bring change to Africa

    Recently, I was among the 122 youths selected to attend the Young Africa Leadership Initiative (YALI) Regional Leadership Centre West Africa Accra Ghana for a leadership training initiated by the President of the United States (U.S.) Barack Obama to help young Africans to be exemplary leaders.

    The initiative is to promote collaboration among the African countries towards bringing a transformation on the continent. Obama believes in the zeal of the youth to drive change in a continent plagued by leadership crisis. He believes if the youth are given the necessary support, they would change the condition of their countries.

    The training brought together nine African countries, which include Nigeria, Ghana, Sierra Leone, Gambia, Liberia, Togo, Cameroun, Burkina Faso and Cote d’Ivoire. Participants were made to stay together in the same place, so that they could engage in cross-cultural discussion to appreciate their diversity.

    The training focused on specific issues that could help to bring transformation to Africa, ranging from leadership, entrepreneurship, public policy, agriculture, Information Technology and cultural diversities. We had experienced facilitators, both from Africa and the U.S., who enlightened us deeply on these different aspects.

    The two most important aspects that were emphasised are leadership and entrepreneurship. This was so, because the common problem most countries in Africa face is leadership. Attention was particularly focused on leadership, because the organisers wanted the participants to know the true meaning of leadership. To make them entrepreneurs, the participants were mentored on how to start successful business to reduce unemployment. After the training, take-off grant was given to participants who presented best entrepreneurship idea.

    It has been said that the major problem hindering development of Africa is leadership. Africa is blessed with amazing resources and climate suitable for its growth. Other continents rely on our natural resources for development. But, its leaders have cornered and converted these natural resources to personal resources.

    In the course of the training, the participants were made to understand that leadership is not about taking dominion over others. Rather, it is about helping others to become the best in the society. Leadership is about service. We were made to understand that it is not until you get to a post that you become a leader; you become a leader from the point you take responsibility for your actions and decisions to make society worth living for the people.

    Youths must understand this, because a lot of attention is now focused on them. The older generation has failed us by handing over a bad system to our generation. We need to change African story bring about transformation. But if the youth don’t have a changed and renewed mindset about leadership, how will they bring the desired change to a continent plagued by corrupt leadership? This is what YALI focused on.

    A herd of sheep being led by a lion can make a change, compared to group of lions being led by a sheep. The youth need to brace up for the challenges ahead. If the youth want a corruption-free system, it starts from their individual activities. You can’t expect a new result when you adopt old ways of doing things. If we want new results, we must be ready to adopt a new system and mechanism. The change we desire will be achieved when we change our mindset and our perspective about things.

    Leadership is about character and character is about what you are doing when nobody is looking at you. A good leader is someone who has a positive character. The corrupt leadership plaguing the continent is as a result of character of people in the position of authority. Focus of the youth must be on how to bring transformation to Africa.

    Entrepreneurship is a panacea to youth unemployment. Youths need to start thinking beyond white-collar jobs. We need to acquire relevant skills, knowledge and expertise that will help us to be problem solvers and not part of the problems. To put African economy on the right track, we need those who can think solutions to problems and not those who will only complain about the problems and do nothing about it.

    Entrepreneurs are those who think solutions to problems. They are innovators who bring new technology, infrastructures and channels that will help to make life easy. Entrepreneurs are employers of labour and the more employers of labour we have among the youths, the less youth unemployment we will have in Africa. Africa needs more entrepreneurs and this can only be done when African youths are enlightened and encouraged to go into entrepreneurship.

    Africa is an important continent and that is the reason why foreign countries believe so much in the continent. There are lots of opportunities for growth and development that can bring about paradigm shift in leadership in Africa. Soon, institutions and new innovations will be emanating from Africa as a result of YALI training. This will go a long way in bringing the needed transformation to Africa.

  • Plus ça change

    Plus ça change

    THIS column assumes that the Federal Executive Council (FEC) cleared the re-launched national re-orientation campaign thematically anchored on Change Begins With Me, and that in particular President Muhammadu Buhari was briefed and was satisfied with the programme of action drawn up by the Ministry of Information, the campaign’s owner and parent. As many commentators, critics and supporters of the re-launched campaign have indicated, the All Progressives Congress (APC) government will not be the first to embark on a campaign to change public attitude to life, governance and public service. And so whether ethical revolution or national orientation, Nigerian governments are skilful in producing slogans and mantras whose conceptual foundations are sometimes amateurish and often war against facts and reality.

    On Thursday, the president kick-started the campaign with what some commentators have described as a rousing, appropriate speech on attitudinal change and re-orientation. If the reader is accustomed to scratching the surface of things, with little or no taste for plumbing the depths of complex and enigmatic issues, the speech is a satisfying piece of elocutionary barnstorming. It could of course be improved here and there, and more syntactic grace added to imbue it with life and resonance, but it fared no worse than the blather even Shakespeare himself unloaded upon his customers. It is the curse of the Ministry of Information that with every change in government, and with no one able to exorcise the ghost of superficial change created and unleashed by the Shehu Shagari presidency in the 1980s, its ministers find it compelling to concoct boondoggles of their own.

    There is nothing wrong with campaigns, for one way or the other there will always be campaigns to change anything disagreeable, either by force or by moral suasion. It is to the credit of many past governments, and indeed President Buhari who once embraced coercive change, that they seemed reluctant to employ genocidal tools in midwifing change like the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia did. Therefore, no amount of criticism, ridicule or resistance can dissuade the Ministry of Information, either under a conservative or progressive government, from indulging its romantic pastime of campaigning for attitudinal change. It is a waste of time to try. But if they exercise their right to formulate campaigns, especially on the back of the nation’s money, critics also reserve the right to draw attention to the futility of the exercise. The campaigns failed in the past, though they were sometimes backed by force or propaganda; there is nothing now to indicate they stand any chance of success.

    The Frenchman, Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Kar, coined a fitting epigram in the 19th century to capture the wastefulness and futility of such idealistic campaigns. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même, he moaned. Roughly translated as ‘The more things change, the more they remain the same”, it suggests that when change comes at all, it sometimes does so gradually and incrementally, almost imperceptibly. Yet, whether revolutionary or incremental change, over the centuries and from the experience of many nations, the status quo has yielded only few inches to the most assertive campaigner. Ask Napoleon Bonaparte; and ask Karl Marx. If the life and ideals of revolutionaries do not convince you, then ask Britain itself, that most famous of conservative nations whose political system, not to say its unwritten constitution, stands as a palladium of immovable change and stifling, suffocating status quo.

    If President Buhari and the Information ministry have learnt anything from the failures of the past, they have not admitted the rest of the country into that secret. Perhaps when the Information minister finally deconstructs the whole exercise, more Nigerians will become persuaded. But so far, there is little room for optimism. Given all that the president has said on the impending campaign to re-orient national attitudes and values, it is hard to see what indeed has changed — no pun intended. There is nothing in the president’s speech, absolutely nothing, to suggest that anyone in the executive arm or the ministry attempted a fundamental appreciation of the problem they hoped would yield to their ethical assault. Without a conceptual statement of the problem, and with apparently no conceptual tools to transform the intended change from its limiting and metaphoric existence, how on earth do they hope to create a new and ideal society?

    President Buhari merely restated the symptoms of Nigeria’s diseased past and present. But the nation ought to have got a gleamer of understanding of what he thinks is really the problem with the national attitude. Had he been able to fairly accurately state the conceptual foundation of the issues that war against the needed new national ethos, Nigerians might be fairly confident that the solution they dream about would not remain the chimera past governments had embraced and choked on for nearly 60 turbulent years.

    Here is the president’s prognosis. “There is no doubt that our value system has been badly eroded over the years. The long-cherished and time-honoured, time-tested virtues of honesty, integrity, hard work, punctuality, good neighbourliness, abhorrence of corruption and patriotism, have given way in the main to dishonesty, indolence, unbridled corruption and widespread impunity.

    “The resultant effect of this derailment in our value system is being felt in the social, political and economic sphere. It is the reason that some youths will take to cultism and brigandage instead of studying hard or engaging in decent living; it is the reason that some elements will break pipelines and other oil facilities, thus robbing the nation of much-needed resources; it is the reason that money belonging to our commonwealth will be brazenly stolen by the same public officials to whom they were entrusted; it is the reason a motorist drives through red traffic lights, it is the reason many will engage in thuggery and vote-stealing during elections; it is part of what has driven our economy into deep problem out of which we are now working hard to extricate ourselves. Every one of us must have a change from our old ways of doing things, we cannot fold our arms and allow things to continue the old way.

    “We must resist the temptation to fall back on the same partisanship, pettiness and immaturity that have poisoned our country for so long. Let us summon a new spirit of responsibility, spirit of service, of patriotism and sacrifice, Let us all resolve to pitch in and work hard and look after, not only ourselves but one another, What the current problem has taught us is that we cannot have a thriving army of rent seekers and vested interests, while the majority suffers.”

    Nigerians have never been in doubt how their country’s ills manifest symptomatically. Nor have they ever lacked adequate platitudes to hurl at the combustible follies and foibles that manifest as their country’s soft underbelly. What befuddle them, on the contrary, are the conceptual foundations of those ills, and how to engineer the right tools to combat them. Driving through red lights is a little part of the symptoms, certainly not on a scale anyone should consider a major problem. Embezzling public funds is done everywhere, and majority of people would steal or cheat if half the chance offers itself; the difference in Nigeria is the quantum, a quantum that is symptomatically enabled and driven by impotent institutions. Political malfeasance is not Nigeria’s exclusive preserve, nor is it the cause of the ills a re-orientation programme can affect with platitudinous change. For every problem the president has identified, there is nothing in it remotely suggesting amenability to the balm of re-orientation he and the Information ministry wishes to apply.

    It is of course possible to strengthen institutions and identify better law enforcement methods to curb many of the tendencies the president identified in his speech last week. But neither he nor those whooping for his speech will get the new society they so wishfully dream about just because they have managed to tackle many of the ills afflicting the society. When President Shagari concocted his ethical revolution, he also inundated the country with platitudes, scratched the surface of the ills and assailed them with half-hearted ethical regimen. No government since then, not President Buhari when he was military head of state with his War Against Indiscipline (WAI), nor ex-head of state Ibrahim Babangida with his Mass Mobilisation for Social Justice, Self Reliance and Economic Recovery (MAMSER), nor yet Sani Abacha whose dissoluteness wholly and powerfully counteracted his rebranded War Against Indiscipline and Corruption (WAIC) campaigns. In his speech, President Buhari scoffs at the ‘theoretic’ exercise of fighting societal ills, probably suggesting that the problem transcended the clumsy theorising of arm-chair idealists. But whatever he has said so far has not given any indication he and his fellow programmers even have a practical appreciation of the problem or the tools to tackle it.

    This columnist has said it repeatedly, but has unfortunately been misunderstood, that what ails Nigeria fundamentally is that neither the government nor the people have a vague, not to talk of clear, concept of Nigeria, and so cannot think of developing a distinct Nigerianness so sorely needed. This terrible detachment has created a vacuum that is being filled by all manner of crazy schemes, including the jaundiced ambition of ethnic and religious irredentists, and the cracked and distorted dreams and visions of myopic politicians and leaders. On this page, President Buhari had often been advised to first produce a concept of the country he wishes to lead and to bequeath. He has not done it. Instead, by a combination of suspect anodynes and jaded templates, he has foisted upon himself, and by extension the nation, a close-knit structure of aides and advisers so insular as to be unable to conceive and enthrone the breathtaking expansiveness and ideology a modern, multicultural and heterogeneous society needs to thrive and function.

    There is no statesman, no great leader, no man with a sense of history, who has affected his nation or empire so thoroughly as President Buhari hopes to do with Nigeria, judging from his speech on re-orientation, that has not first formulated and injected into the body politic a fundamental concept of his country. It is that concept that will form the pivot on which everything without exception turns. It is that concept that differentiates the French from other Europeans, the German from the rest, the Briton from other Islanders, the American, Russian etc from yet other peoples. And it is on such a concept that the exceptionalism of great nations is built and nurtured. If the president and his Information ministry still can’t understand this, then let them go and read the history they have avoided and despised for so long, the history so near under their noses that it emits the fame and raison d’etre of the Oyo Empire, Sokoto Caliphate, Benin Empire, Kanem-Bornu Empire, and so many more.

    In forming Nigeria, the British spurned the lessons of the nation-building cataclysm (the Spring of Nations) that convulsed Europe in 1848. They, therefore, carved Nigeria after their own disingenuous expediencies, eviscerated the country of the proud, independent and gifted souls that gave its peoples hope and being, and distorted this country’s noble histories midwifed through the magnifying glasses of the iconic Oduduwa, the scholarly Shehu Usman Dan Fodio, the audacious Alafin Abiodun, the extraordinary Tsoegi, the enigmatic Mai Idris Alooma, and the celebrated Eweka I, etc. The vacuum thus created has become so deep and encompassing that it is difficult to see how campaigns and platitudes will reform a police force so poorly funded that it cannot but be evilly inventive in resolving their financial woes, a military force built on the retrogressive tradition of lording it over the people in all manner of depressing abnormalities, a civil service treated contemptibly and brusquely by the ruling class and must fend for itself outside the law, an unfeeling political class that seeks advantage over one another, even if elections had to be ingeniously postponed, and health and education systems so barren and disconnected from the people that its functionaries are incapable of embracing any other ambition but that of self.

    The national re-orientation campaign theme is ‘Change Begins With Me’. However, reading through the president’s speech, and extrapolating from what the Information ministry might be doing or contemplating, the government really hopes the campaign would begin not with the rulers, but with the ruled. The ‘Me’ in their campaign is a subterfuge. But whether the campaign begins with those in office or the hapless people subjected to gross misrule, both the rulers and the ruled would be chasing a chimera if they do not appreciate that no change can take place of the quality and structure they campaign for until Nigeria knows who it is (identity) and what its ambitions in the world are (vision). No past president has shown that requisite depth of understanding, and none has done so even now; no, not President Buhari, nor the ‘theoretic’ and highfalutin denizens of the Information ministry. Until Nigerians get a sense of a country they understand and love, and are willing to die for, all campaigns will be nothing but tilting at windmills.

  • Tunde Soleye changes ways

    Tunde Soleye changes ways

    AT a time when happenings flow one after the other like waves upon the pebbled shore, the best thing to do is adopt a protean attitude which adapts to changing circumstances. Foremost medical doctor, Tunde Soleye, seems to embody the principle of changing with the times.

    In a time of recession and scaled-back luxuries, the maverick social event patron has scaled down his presence at A-list events and night outs. Whereas he was the darling of the occasion in robust times, the amiable former beau of ex-beauty queen Nike Oshinowo is rather withdrawn these days.

    It was gathered that the man with the glamorous beard has become more circumspect about where he is seen in relation to his advancing years. As maturity sets in, Soleye carefully selects his outings and intelligently picks his friends while making sure to step back far from the madding crowd.

    Where he once delighted in the rush of the cocktail and the dance floor, he mostly stays indoors and makes do with the intellectual delight that introspection offers.

  • The change Nigeria truly needs

    SIR: For Nigeria to move forward, we need to change and move beyond a number of things, beginning with our unproductive mind-sets and defeatist cultural dispositions. The criminal thinking of “the oil in the Niger-Delta belongs to Kano” or “let’s all share the money Lagos State makes from its wealth creation activities” or “the lush green farmlands of Plateau State belongs to Bayelsa state farmers”, is asinine, petty and unproductive and the truth is that they do not. This sort of thinking is the premium product of a lazy person or society.

    For our beloved Nigeria to succeed and grow, it MUST amend the 1999 constitution to free up our potentials, via the devolution of power to the states to enable them become effective contributors to the national commonwealth, through the exploitation and maximisation of their comparative advantages instead of having them remain perpetual parasites and impoverished dependents of a currently struggling taskmaster.

    The new political-economic system of Nigeria must ensure that states finance their recurrent expenditure from their internally generated revenue (IGR); this will ensure fiscal discipline on the part of our rock star governors. The situation where a former governor of Bauchi State had 600 plus aides, whom he financed with his state’s share of the proceeds of oil revenue – located in the Niger-Delta, must stop and only the adoption and practice of political and fiscal federalism will ensure that.

    When the governor of a state has to think of ways to develop and grow his state’s economy and IGR, he will have little time for folly and frivolity. Lagos State has succeeded because it was forced to look inwards after its federal allocations were withheld by the Obasanjo government over disagreements between the duo, vis a vis the creation of new local governments by the Lagos State government.

    Lagos began to broaden its tax base, became more fiscally disciplined, invested heavily in infrastructure and sundry capital projects and security, to attract and retain both local and foreign investments and today the internally generated revenue of Lagos is able to meet 70% of its needs, with federal allocation accounting for less than 30%.

    Furthermore, the legal and regulatory framework governing the oil and gas sector needs to be reviewed, in other words, the Petroleum Industry Bill which has lingered at the National Assembly for almost 10 years needs to be passed into law. A lot has been said about the revolutionary nature of this bill and it’s nationalistic intent, we must pass this bill into law in our own interests, the urgency of this action is more imperative at this time of dwindling economic fortunes.

    If Nigeria is to move forward then we must reconstruct our national political-economic architecture, and remove this system that subjugates economic development to sentiments and petty ethno-religious considerations, as the imbroglio surrounding the PIB has shown us.

    Nigeria currently practices a system that ENABLES corruption and ENSURES bad governance and we need to change that. Nigeria cannot continue to trust and depend on the good intentions of the men and women we elect into political office. We must evolve and develop a system that incentivises hard work, merit, good governance and sanctions stupidity, prebendalism and nepotism, irrespective of the good intentions or lack thereof of the political operators we elect.

    Nigeria runs a system that ensures that those who refuse to work, not only eat, but eat MORE than those that work, and this injustice has been our bane and the major, if not the sole reason we have been burdened with poor nay despicable leadership across all tiers of government in Nigeria since the return of democracy.

    This must CHANGE.

     

    • Barrister UgochukwuAmasike,

    Lagos.

  • Can we ever change?

    My ears are full. The noise over Nigeria’s poor outing at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games is deafening. The reasons range from the serious to the laughable and the ridiculous. Were we expecting medals, when only a few of our athletes are world-ranked?

    Nigeria will always fumble at big sporting tournaments, unless we adopt a model which accommodates the sports calendar year budget, not the fiscal budget we run here. The reason is simple. Countries that excel in events such as the Olympics don’t operate a yearly budgetary system like ours in sports. What they have is a sports calendar system where cash is earmarked by the government over four years, which is the time limit between big tournaments, such as the Olympics, World Cup etc.

    A critical example why we should run the sports calendar system is the politics being played between Sports Minister, Solomon Dalung, and the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF). Dalung begs NFF to pay Samson Siasia and NFF General Secretary, Mohammed Sanusi says Siasia’s outstanding wages have been delayed by the new government policy – TSA. Dalung keeps quiet instead of urging Siasia to wait a bit longer. Most ministers like Dalung make issues out of NFF’s affair, yet worse things happen in the other 28 sports federations. We haven’t heard Dalung cry out the way he is doing with the NFF for all the cases of humiliation to other federations’ contingents who were refused entry visas to compete, leading to Nigeria being walkover in major competitions.

    Dalung, unlike other ministers, is the problem with our sports. Anytime we have major soccer competitions, he creates problems where there are none. He is fueling the Siasia salary saga as if he doesn’t have the powers to pay him from the ministry’s contingency cash and then withdraw at source from NFF’s monthly subventions which pass through his ministry.

    We need to ask the minister if it was wrong for the NFF chiefs to impound the official vehicle driven by the coach’s wife. What does the rule say about those who can drive an official vehicle? Does it include the wife driving it in her husband’s absence? Is there any rule that gives the official’s wife permission to drive his official car when he is away on national assignment? Honourable minister sir, you know the truth. You are the problem with our sports, with the derisive decisions you have taken since your assumed office.

    Dalung denied knowing about the Dream Team VI’s stay in Atlanta only to swallow his vomit. It didn’t matter if he knew that NFF employed Rohr as Super Eagles manager. Basketball and table tennis federations, for instance, have foreign coaches grooming. Need I waste space to celebrate their feats?

    Dalung’s meddlesomeness in NFF’s affairs is the reason we didn’t win a gold medal at the Olympics. Dalung’s comments about the NFF have been awful, making it impossible for the federation to generate revenue to drive its operations outside government funding like it is done in other climes.

    Dalung must tell Nigerians what he did with these anomalies listed below to see if he has been fair with the NFF. For instance, Turkey denied visa to the Nigerian wrestling team to participate in the Rio Olympics qualifying tournament. Funds prevented the women team from participating at the 2016 World Championship in Malaysia. The men’s team sponsored themselves to the tournament.

    The Nigeria Taekwondo Federation (NTF) admitted that lack of funds hindered its preparation for the 2016 Olympic qualifying tournament. This stopped the team from fielding quality athletes for the Rio 2016 Olympic Games, for the first time in the last four editions of the games.

    The Spanish embassy in the country refused to issue entry visas to the national women U-17 basketball team, which was billed to feature in the 2016 world championship hosted by Spain.

    Lack of fund stalled the Handball Team’s participation in the 2016 Nations Cup in Egypt. Dalung, sir, if all these had happened in NFF, its members would have been languishing in cells.

    We have in the last ten years had over nine sports ministers, who discarded the jobs done by their predecessors. Policy summersaults is chiefly responsible for the dearth of talent hunting programmes. In the past, National Sports Festivals were held in years preceding any major competition, such as the Olympics. Governors now jostle to host it to win it. Several events are dropped because the host cannot provide the facilities or have states hoping to use those medals to win the multisport event marooned. The National Sports Festival was a carnival, where new talents emerged to replace ageing stars. Athletes now beat their chests to have attended several Olympics because the nursery has been destroyed. Schools sport is dead because it isn’t in their curriculum. The open spaces and parks around the cities where kids recreate have been built up. Schools hardly have play grounds. There are no more Colleges of Physical and Health Education to produce the games masters and mistresses who teach the kids the rudiments of games.

    The Ministries of Education in the states are idle. Sports councils are relics, simply because most governors don’t think that sport is central to their programmes for the people. It is customary for some states not to attend national sports competitions, with the state governors not perturbed. I digress!

    Those who excel in competitions run models learned from others. But the common dominator is the sports commission idea led by technocrats with business-minded ideals that help to raise funds outside government. Countries with such a model only get cash from government for competitions. The cash, needless to say, come as when due. What we have in Nigeria is a situation where sports, which is a money spinner, is kept as an arm of the Youth Ministry. Isn’t it the youth that participates more in sports? Isn’t it the youth that have the energy to burn in sports? If we engage them, won’t that create more jobs for people across the 774 Local Government Areas?

    For those yearly sporting events, these countries have evolved cash-driven initiatives anchored on sports lottery schemes, which mostly is all encompassing in the sense that everyone participates in contributing cash to the scheme. Besides, these countries’ governments create the enabling environment for sports to thrive by providing the facilities, which will go a long way in attracting the attention of blue-chip companies to contribute their quota towards stabilising this industry.

    Companies don’t jump into sporting events for the fun of it. They are into any enterprise for business. In the case of sports, the people oil the operations, making it imperative for companies to deploy their CSR personnel to consider some sports for support, most times because their top men play the games. But the government can make many companies bankroll sports if they offer big rebates to them. Tax reliefs, for instance, help these companies’ books at the end of the year, since they are in business to make money for their shareholders.

    The Nigerian Paralympians will always do well because many of them are record holders. They are the ones to beat. Ironically, they don’t prepare well for competitions like their able-bodied counterparts. We have a systemic problem which can only be resolved, if we are professional in the administration of the industry. After the Olympics and Paralympics, nobody remembers the athletes until it is time for another tournament. I digress.

    Indeed, 209 countries were at the Rio Olympics. The multi-sport event is the platform for the best among the best to compete. A competition for champions, not upstarts. It isn’t a podium to celebrate mediocrity, which was what Nigeria’s presence at the Games meant, given our usual shambolic outing at big sporting events.

    Perhaps it is time for our sports administrators started considering the option of making each region concentrate on producing athletes in areas where it has comparative advantage over others.

    For instance, Plateau state is known for its high altitude; hence, the state should be made to produce athletes for the long distance races and marathon. The South-South region, blessed with huge water resources, should produce swimmers; the North, known for men with good heights, should be encouraged to produce basketballers, high and long jumpers. There may be raw talents, but grooming them over a period of four to eight years, with adequate exposure to local and international training and competition, will do the magic.

    The sports ministry, backed by the might of the government, can have an arrangement with corporate bodies for sponsorship of such discovered talents. This will take a huge financial burden off the government, which will only reciprocate sponsorship deals with tax holidays or rebates for the sponsoring firms.

    I align with President Muhammadu Buhari if he is happy with our outing in Rio. The president was definitely comparing notes with what happened in 2012 Olympic Games in London. Nigeria didn’t win any medal in England. The bronze in Brazil is good but the president knows better, considering our status at the Olympics when things were right.

     

    Where is that (Nigeria)?

     

    I’m a proud Nigerian. I get easily irritated when the media celebrate foreigners who don’t recognise us simply because they are achievers for other countries. It typifies what the late Afrobeat king, Fela Anikulapko Kuti (the Ebami Eda of exciting memory) tagged colonial mentality in one of his songs.

    Most of these so called Nigeria-born kids have single parentage and perceive any link of them to our great country as a taboo. Little wonder, they are quick to ask when Nigeria is mentioned to them: where is that? We must learn how to develop our talents at the grassroots by providing the facilities for them to train. This has been the missing link between homegrown talents and those “foreigners” we annoyingly call Nigerians. This must stop.

    Nigeria is too big to be tagged “where is that?” not with the exploits of our compatriots in all fields of human endeavour. It is the reason their so-called parents find it difficult to convince them to play for us. They come up with all kinds of reservations, as if we are in a jungle.

    Many of these so-called Nigeria-born won’t represent us except they can’t secure a place in those countries. But we hurry to admit them to compete. And the results are there for everyone to see especially in athletics.

    We must never run to them. The future of our sports is here, not with any Nigeria-born tokunbo athlete. If they must compete for us, it must be done on their own volition.

  • Is this the change we voted for?

    The last couple of weeks have witnessed the heaviest public criticism of the Muhammadu Buhari administration since he came to power.  Much of it has been on account of the unresolved social and economic problems facing the country.

    Unfair criticism of the Buhari administration especially on account of escalating prices of foodstuff and the liberalization of the currency exchange needs to be challenged before it overshadows the commendable job the President has done in fighting terrorism as part of overall effort to secure the country, reducing corruption and yes, arresting the economic slide before it sinks the nation.

    Wherever they go these days, in London, Dubai, Beijing, Washington, New York or Tokyo, Nigerians get the good feeling of being asked the question, how is President Muhammadu Buhari?

    It is a proud moment for many citizens that the country is being perceived differently now that it has a different kind of leader creating a positive buss abroad, the kind of sentiment that can lead to foreign investments when properly capitalized upon.

    The lavish praise the President gets abroad and the wide public support he enjoys among the lower segment of the local population is, by contrast, given a short shrift in the local press, mainstream and online. At its lowest point, this unambiguous media rebuke has created a wave of sympathy for anyone with a view that runs counter to the President’s.

    Boko Haram terrorist leader, Shekau or the pipeline vandal form the Delta region is more likely to get newspaper front pages today than the Minister of Labour, Governor EmekaNgige or the Finance Minister Kemi Adeosun talking about jobs creation in the economy.

    I don’t say that media criticism is not reflective of the feeling of the citizens.

    President Buhari has himself on numerous occasions admitted that the change mantra has brought with it pain and suffering which he likened to the pains of labour. It is a passing phase.

    When they ask the question, is this the change we voted for, the critic forgets how far we have come from the scam-tainted years of the PDP rule.

    How many people have given a thought to the possibility of Nigeria doing something that the combined strength of Europe and America have failed to do?

    There are many today who take for granted the declared victory over the Boko Haram terrorists, forgetting the reign of the bomber who made it almost impossible for regular attendance in Churches and Mosques in many of our cities, including the Federal Capital City, Abuja.

    Victory over Boko Haram has brought peace not only to Nigeria but to the countries in the Lake Chad region.

    The world leaders are still at work trying to contain the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, ISIS, which threat sadly continues to become more potent.

    Everyone living in Nigeria knows that there is a major movement against corruption as part of the ongoing change. This war has forced the return to the treasury of billions of Naira and millions of Dollars stolen by past officials.

    On account of this war, government suspects that the biggest trigger of the opposition to the change agenda is the army of the corrupt. With the enormous resources at their disposal; money that is unearned, these forces are ready to throw in everything to gag the Buhari administration.

    When he assumed office, President Buhari said he understood the outcry of Nigerians and was determined to right those wrongs. I will remind of his inaugural speech where he said: “At home we face enormous challenges. Insecurity, pervasive corruption, the hitherto unending and seemingly impossible fuel and power shortages are the immediate concerns. We are going to tackle them head on. Nigerians will not regret that they have entrusted national responsibility to us.  We must not succumb to hopelessness and defeatism. We can fix our problems.”(Emphasis added).

    He has said times without number that his government is dedicated to the poor. As can be seen from the 2016 budget, this is a government that is determined to hugely empower the disadvantaged groups- the poor, the jobless, the widows and the orphaned children including those of the North-East.

    As a listening government, the President was prepared to open the door to additional food imports but given the processes involved, the turnaround in any such import of commodities would have taken a long time as to coincide with the harvest of home grown grains and cereals now in progress. The market would have been deluged and the local grower given the short end of the stick.

    Calls on Hausa radio by a rabble-rousing section of the opposition for the “reopening of borders” to “allow food come in” are redundant and mischievous because all the county’s borders remain open till date.

    Following the budget, the administration has begun rolling out several social welfare programmes. The direct cash transfer to the poorest of the poor, the school feeding and the recruitment/skills training of about one million jobless citizens are such an example.

    In addition to hard work, all leaders need luck on their side to create what is sometimes seen as economic miracles. As leader, President Buhari never had the luxury of high oil prices as did his predecessors in office.

    When he first emerged as the military Head of State, General Buhari saw oil price, the mainstay of the nation’s economy sink to as low eight Dollars a barrel.

    He rolled up his sleeves, worked on diversification strategy of the economy only to be eased out of power just as they began to take hold. Thereafter, his successors abandoned these efforts.

    On his second coming, this time as a democratically elected leader, the collapse of oil prices has challenged President Buhari to quicken efforts towards the diversification of the economy with emphasis given to agriculture and solid minerals mining. Every crisis, it is said, is an opportunity. Not so in Nigeria. This is a country that inherited massive technological inventions from Biafra, yet failed to take it forward. We must not lose this opportunity to diversify the economy and our foreign earnings presented by the present oil crisis.

    As the country hopes for a bumper harvest this year, government is taking steps to ensure that no farmer will sell at a loss or fail to find markets for their harvests. Grain silos are being readied nationwide to receive excess produce for warehousing to ensure food security, avert market glut and price collapse. By this, government will ensure a minimum guaranteed price.

    In dealing with challenges of the economy, the administration is devoting attention to ridding the country of its notoriety as a difficult place of doing business.

    The government has been making quiet but significant progress in this area, thanks to the leadership given by the National Economic Council under the Vice President and the combined efforts of the Ministries of Trade and Investment, Finance, Interior, Foreign Affairs, Budget and Planning and the Customs under new leadership.

    Everyone in this sector is doing everything in their power to boost up Nigeria.

    President Buhari’s infrastructure initiatives will see country making progress with intractable projects such as the Second Niger bridge, the East-West expressway, the green field Lagos-Abuja expressway and important national railway projects, Lagos-Calabar and Lagos-Kano which had been on the drawing boards for as long as anyone can remember.

    These projects will be counted among the accomplishments of the administration alongside the 4,000 MW Mambila power plant which the President has declared a national priority. Government has also taken several bold steps to boost renewable energy. It has opened the door for a new conversation on the environment with decisive steps towards the clean-up the Ogoniland in the Niger Delta.

    The removal of subsidies on the petrol products has saved the government more than two trillion Naira annual expenditure.

    President Buhari’s foreign trips have brought many things to the country. He has energized our foreign policy. Beyond the enormous goodwill reaped from “resetting” age-old but damaged relations with neighbours and distant partners and friends, the President has attracted foreign development assistance and direct investments (FDI). It is generally accepted that good foreign relations bring foreign direct investment. So much is currently being done one year into the administration. This is in spite of the world economy being sluggish and recession-stricken.

    It bears repeating that President is a different kind of leader, who just happens to be a victim of the tyranny of high expectations. He has brought positive intention, commitment, honesty and personal integrity into governance. This is why the country’s poor hold him so dear; this is why the world is in love with him.

    His knack for prudent spending and effective management of resources is in the belief that this country can only prosper when there is transparency, reduced corruption and a drastic cut in bureaucratic red tape.

    His decision to have a small cabinet, reducing government ministries from 46 to 24 has the effect of relieving the treasury of the burden of salaries, allowances and miscellaneous expenses now being counted in billions of Naira.

    President Buhari should be credited for the unblemished record of his ministers. This is a government that has stayed above scandal for a year.

    If all of these are not desirable changes, to be appreciated and adored, it is hard to know or determine what some of our critics want.

    As to the question of these leading to a resurgent economy, it all means that in a democracy everything takes times. The President needs our support with understanding and patience. No matter how hasty a president wants to bring changes, there is no magic wand in that office to make everything change from bad to good or make all of us prosperous with a wave of the hand. This change is on course. It requires patience.

     

    Shehu is Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity.

  • Change is here: The National Assembly must never again be allowed to get away with stealing public funds

    Change is here: The National Assembly must never again be allowed to get away with stealing public funds

    According to Abayomi who has been fighting this oddity since 2002 and has a
    case in court about it,  there is nothing like constituency project since the National
    Assembly has NO power, whatever, to insert any project in a budget.

    Whoever hasn’t seen the CHANGE in town will not recognise a cyclone if he sees one. Isn’t it the saying that there is honour even amongst thieves? When was it Nigerians ever saw anything like this hurricane convulsing the House of Representatives?  Apparently, even with all the emphasis on CHANGE during the Buhari campaign, our legislators never believed that a new Sheriff had hit town. How would they, with Saraki riding roughshod, not only over the APC but significantly insulting the president in the process?  Nor had Dogara a whiff of it either, but he was smarter, and a lot more respectful. So he soft-pedaled and aligned with the party. But collectively, they believed that what Ndume called their internal mechanism – read chop and clean mouth – would still be the order of the day.

    So  off they went,  padding  and padding, believing they could make the Buhari budget in their own image and,  like in President  Jonathan’s  days, every machete was out, cutting slices of a budget that  they knew was going to be funded through massive external  borrowing. But who cares?  If you believe the Dogara side of this roforofo fight, you will have the following: “For reasons that were not noble and not in the Public Interest, Hon Abdulmumin had initially inflated the Budget by adding about N250b more to the total figure as submitted by Mr President. This, the NASS leadership out rightly rejected as a form of financial recklessness and inability to appreciate the dwindling resources available to government necessitating that we act prudently” I can hear Nigerians asking  these con artists  when exactly they started being, not only  so  people -friendly, but  caring and  responsible. If they were half as considerate in an economy where so many are hurting, they would long have stopped being amongst the highest paid legislators in the world as I would show below. Confident that  they would successfully pad  the Buhari  budget,  change or no change, since this has been a  long running practice in the National Assembly,  dating back to the  Obasanjo era  when  that President hauled some  of them  before the  courts,  Abdulmumin alleged that the House leadership “fraudulently shortchanged  the House by taking away N40 billion out of the N100 billion allocated for constituency projects and distributing same to  themselves even   without  the approval of the House”. It did not stop there as, according to Jibrin, “10 standing committees of the House inserted over 2000 projects worth N284 Billion”, into a budget President Buhari was agonising over its funding. Rationalising this public odium, however, hear how the Chairman, House Information Committee, Abdulrazak Namdas insulted Nigerians. According to him “given the workings of the budget process, the House cannot be accused of padding because there is nothing like that.’ In his puerile explanation, this same man, who Tunji Abayomi, a doctorate degree holder in Law. recently  took through a learning process on budget making on Channels TV, said  the following: “Section 4 empowers the National Assembly to make laws for the good governance of the federation while Section 59 confers on the Legislature final say on the budget. “Section 80 (4) on the other hand, which confers on the legislature absolute power of control over public funds, states: “No money shall be withdrawn from the Consolidated Revenue Fund or any other public fund of the Federation, except in the manner prescribed by the National Assembly”. And the cheek of it: “The word manner confers absolute legislative discretion. “When, therefore, the National Assembly appropriates funds in the budget, it can never under any circumstances or guise be deemed or regarded as tinkering or padding’. What impudence, what banality, both anchored on a stultifying ignorance!

    If this fellow was not such a poor student, he should not have forgotten the most elementary of what Dr Abayomi taught him: simply, that Budget making is an EXECUTIVE function and that it is the ONLY subject about which the Nigerian constitution specifically specifies the modus. According to Abayomi who has been fighting this oddity since 2002 and has a case in court about it,  there is nothing like constituency project since the National Assembly has NO power, whatever, to insert any project in a budget. Therefore, the only way legislators can help their constituencies is by lobbying the Executive branch to have projects inserted in the budget. To do otherwise, I hope they now know, is to sleep walk to jail.

    A stitch in time…

  • Using varsities to drive change

    Government policies in Nigeria are rarely informed by rigorous research. More often than not, it does appear that planning is done amid the near absence of hard facts. This aversion for information-based planning partly explains why most incumbent governments overturn the policies of their predecessors while introducing new and often conflicting policies. This practice is not costless as the masses bear the brunt of such policy inconsistencies.  More disturbing however is the origin of the ideas driving these policies. For the most part, indigenous researches are taken to be inferior to imported/expatriate evidences. These imported policies mostly are misfits due to the lack of proper grounding in the peculiar realities of the Nigerian context. The world over, successful countries are typically those that prioritize the researches from their universities and other research institutions. This they do by allocating sufficient funds to these institutions.  In these countries, research outputs are not only critical drivers of their economies but also the harbinger of rapid transformation in technology, infrastructure and the like. Little wonder that our gluttonous politicians run to these places with our stolen money for holidays.

    It is incontrovertible that we can neither grow nor develop without funding policy-inclined researches. There is, therefore, a correlation between research outputs and economic transformation. Evidences of the societal functionality of this important nexus abound with Israel, China, USA, UK among others reaping the dividends from research. The proponents of the “Change” mantra need to drive it beyond mere rhetoric by committing adequate funds to research. Developed countries base their policies on researches which proffer solutions to identified problems. It is the same research that makes technologically advanced societies to develop products like phones with ‘torch-light’, rechargeable lanterns which become major consumption items for our own economy. Through this, they rake in substantial foreign earnings into their countries. Another case in point is the fairly recent ‘Ebola’ episode. Recall that it was easy to transport medical doctors infected with the deadly ‘Ebola’ back to Emory Hospital, USA, where they were treated. Of course, this was a specialized institution where huge financial resources had been invested into researching uncommon diseases. To be factual, Nigeria in particular and Africa in general needs to fund research to understand its economies in order to be able to solve the seemingly intractable problems of insecurity, health, agricultural productivity, low ranking of universities, militancy and the rise in insurgent citizenship.

    The foregoing and allied issues took center stage when Leading African Development Economist and Vice Chancellor of University of Ghana, Legon, Professor Ernest Aryeetey delivered the 67th Interdisciplinary Discourse of the Postgraduate School, University of Ibadan on the topic “”Developing Research Universities for Africa: Some New Approaches”. He stressed the need for Nigeria and Africa to invest in university research in order to have globally competitive economies. He noted that low investment in research-focused universities accounts for why many African universities are lowly ranked and cannot be globally competitive. According to him, it is impractical to contemplate competing with Harvard, Cambridge, London School of Economics and other top rated universities if Nigeria, and Africa at large, is not ready to invest massively in boosting the research capacities of its universities. By implication, Africa must therefore consciously and concertedly develop research universities that will help in providing sound knowledge economy for its transformation and positive change. Professor Aryeetey averred that universities must specialize either in teaching or conducting research noting that not all universities should be combining teaching with research. He noted that African universities must collaborate and carry out researches on problems facing the continent. He further noted that some progress is being made along this route with the formation of African Research Universities Alliance (ARUA).

    To quote him verbatim, “Having research focused universities is important but expensive but the end product is total transformation and economic growth. Innovation comes from research which leads to transformation. We need to pay more attention to research in Africa. Our governments complain of low ranking universities and want us to compete globally but can they do what Harvard, Yale and Princeton universities are investing in research? They must invest in research to have their economies change and the continent can be competitive with the rest of the world. We need to change the face of infrastructure in our universities and attract leading scholars through attractive incentives and train more faculties that can conduct transformational research. African problems are of different nature. Our problem is about low productivity in agriculture, health but we must conduct researches that will solve our own problems. We must formulate policies based on researches conducted by African researchers not on imported policy from another clime which is at variance with realities on the continent. It is sad that Africa accounts for a disappointing one percent of world research outputs at present.”

    Since there is a strong and positive relationship between research outputs and economic growth, Nigeria through President Buhari and other African governments must fund research for the transformation of Africa. Otherwise, it will be difficult for the continent to experience transformation. Aside the dismal performance of government on this metric, how many of our industries fund researches? These private sector entities rather sponsor singing competitions, beauty pageants and so on. Some of these musicians, whose songs encourage anti-social behaviours (like rape, cybercrime, kidnapping), get lucrative endorsements deals as brand ambassadors for private organisations. Politicians even enlist these entertainers during electioneering campaigns with those who are called ‘Honourables’ dancing enthusiastically. At the other end of the continuum, one ponders what happens to ‘First Class’ graduates. Except for dedicated newspapers that now conduct interviews with them, there seems to be no deliberate effort to invest in nurturing them. The usual script is that Nigeria waits for you to either waste away or sweat-to-glory and become a global citizen before claiming you as their own (this rings loud in the labeling of the likes of Wole Soyinka and Chimamanda Adichie in federal government advertisement of Nigerians doing well across the globe).

    On the part of our universities, they also need to conduct researches that meet the needs of our environment and thereby build the requisite trust that will attract patronage both from the public and private sectors. Additional government funding will encourage researching alternative sources of power, security, low cost health equipment, ICT among others. This proactive approach should be conspicuous in the intent and actions of government. Such pragmatism is a far better substitute to the present penchant of the ruling class for shedding crocodile tears at convocation ceremonies. They expend ample speech time on low ranking of Nigerian Universities without speaking to funding lapses and the yet-to-be fulfilled N1.3trilion NEEDS assessment intervention fund agreed to with the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) following the strike in 2013. Close to three years after that agreement, nothing has changed except that the blame game has come in diverse shades. Without a doubt, ASUU strikes have been an integral contributor to the little achievements we can itemize on our campuses. Nonetheless, the lukewarm attitude of the union as well as its reactionary roles on education and other national issues are aspects that require urgent attention by the leadership of the body at all levels.

    Funding research will drive growth and development. President Muhammadu Buhari needs to hire an assistant on ‘Research Monitoring’ who can relate with universities and convert many research projects on departmental, faculty and library shelves to realistic transformational policies. Change by word of mouth is and will perpetually remain theoretical. Only the practical recognition of the role of universities in national development will suffice for the kind of progressive change our nation desperately needs.

     

    • Dr Tade, a sociologist wrote via dotad2003@yahoo.com