Tag: charge

  • Nwakali, Iheanacho charge Eaglets

    Nwakali, Iheanacho charge Eaglets

    Chidiebere Nwakali and Kelechi Iheanacho, the two protagonists in the 2013 FIFA World Cup-winning Golden Eaglets, have made an appeal to the present set to keep the flag flying and ensure qualification for the 2015 African Under-17 Championship to be hosted in Niger.

    The duo that moved to Manchester City after the World conquest in the United Arab Emirates made the clarion call in a telephone conversation with an official of the team on Sunday.

    “How are the boys doing sir? began Nwakali whose junior brother, Kelechi is the captain of the present set.

    “I hope they are pushing hard in training, please let them know that they have to fight their way and qualify for the African tournament.

    “Is Kelechi doing well too? Please, give my best wishes to the entire team” he added before allowing his roommate and compatriot,Iheanacho to speak.

    “Long time sir and how is the team doing?” Iheanacho, the 2013 U-17 Golden Ball winner asked rhetorically. “I believe all is well with everyone, please greet the players and officials; and we are wishing your team all the best.”

  • Jadeja facing misconduct charge

    Jadeja facing misconduct charge

    England team manager Phil Neale has charged India’s Ravindra Jadeja under Level 2 of the International Cricket Council’s code of conduct.

    The allegation relates to the altercation between Jadeja and England bowler James Anderson as they made their way off for lunch on day two of the first Investec Test at Trent Bridge.

    India decided on Tuesday to charge Anderson at Level 3 – under which guilt is punishable by up to a four-Test ban – and the England and Wales Cricket Board immediately made clear its intention to send a counter-allegation against Jadeja to Dubai.

    On Wednesday afternoon, the eve of the second Test at Lord’s, the ICC acknowledged receipt.

    A press release read: “The ICC today confirmed that England team manager Phil Neale has charged India’s Ravindra Jadeja under Level 2 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel for an alleged incident that took place on the second day of the first cricket Test at Trent Bridge.

    “The alleged offence has been reported under Article 2.2.11 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which states: “Where the facts of the alleged incident are not adequately or clearly covered by any of the above offences, conduct that either: (a) is contrary to the spirit of the game; or (b) brings the game into disrepute.”

    All Level 2 breaches carry a fine of between 50-100 per cent of a match fee or a possible one-Test ban.

     

  • Ex-council chief debunks fraud charge

    Ex-council chief debunks fraud charge

    There is tension in Orumba North Local Government Area of Anambra State. At its centre are the former chairman of the transition committee of the council, Emeka Aforka, his former councillors and some politicians in the area.

    Some members of Aforka’s transition committee have accused him of fraudulently diverting funds. Some 21 members who served with him during the Peter Obi administration submitted a five-page petition to Governor Willie Obiano.

    Aforka dismissed the charge, saying his performance as transition committe chairman speaks for itself.

    But in the petition, his accusers  called on Governor Obiano to probe the former council chief because of the address he presented while handing over to the newly elected chairman of the council, Okey Enekwe.

    The address, which Aforka submitted to Enekwe, listed some of the projects he initiated and completed throughout his two years and seven months in office.

    In their petition, the members of the committee alleged that most of the projects Aforka claimed to have completed were nonexistent, saying that all he did was deceive the public.

    Our correspondent gathered that the former council chief had some misunderstandings with his political godfather from Awgbu who convinced Obi to appoint him chairman.

    It was gathered that Aforka incurred the wrath of his master when he refused to pay some debts owed by his boss immediately he left office, an obligation he was said to have been carrying out while in office.

    The projects which the opposition listed as nonexistent included Ndiokolo Health Centre, construction of Eke-Oko and Afor-Ufuma markets.

    Others were palliative measures that curtailed the Amaokpala erosion menace which for many years threatened the lives of the people of the community.

    Also, in Afor-Udo Market in Nanka community, modern toilets were constructed for the convenience of the traders including the procurement and installation of a transformer at Eziokwe village in Ndikelionwu community.

    It was gathered that the only project the former council chief did not complete was the Oronata Bridge after its flag-off.

    Another allegation raised by the group was that they were paid N25,000 as monthly salary in the council by their former chairman instead of the approved N120, 000.

    Some of the leaders of different communities who spoke with our correspondent on the issue said the petition allegedly aimed at stopping Aforka’s towering political height.

    “The composition of the petition and the allegations raised against him showed a clear gang-up to tarnish his image. But let me tell you that everybody in this local government is happy and should be grateful to that young man,” Chief Okwudili Okafor said.

    As a result of these allegations, some of the traditional rulers in the local government area have risen in defence of their former council chief.

    For instance, the traditional ruler of Amaokpala, one of the communities that make up the council area, Igwe C. O. Okeke who said he is in possesion of a copy of the petition said: ”Nobody will ever perform a miracle; he did his best for the people of our local government, especially in my community where he did palliative work on the devastating erosion that has given us  headaches in this area.

    “One fact is that you cannot satisfy everybody no matter what you do. It is a common thing among our people to criticise but Emeka Aforka did perform well.”

    Also speaking Igwe M.C Okechukwu of Awgbu, praised Aforka, even as he listed some of the projects he did in some of the communities, especially in Awgbu. Some of the projects he listed included schools, markets and healthcare centre, among others.

    According to the monarch, those projects were there for people to see, adding that their prayer was to have another person that could perform like him.

    Others who spoke to our correspondent said the former council chief performed well, even as they described the allegations as frivolous and unfounded.

    The former members of the transition committee in the area, numbering 17 led by the ex-deputy chairman representing Ufuma Ward 2 Hon. Sam Mba, said those bent on rubbishing the legacies of the past administration were acting on their own.

    “We are aware that the petition was sponsored and it was written in bad fate, spiced with lies and distortion of facts to discredit not only the former council administration but to label the APGA-led government as a failure in Orumba North.”

    The said petition was allegedly written by one Ernest Igboanugo who was said to be a member of the cabinet of the former local government administration.

    However, one of the signatories, who did not want his name in print, told our correspondentin Awka that Aforka was a smiling hangman in office who denied them of their entitlements.

    Besides, he said the projects he claimed to have done were all painted sepulture to deceive the public. He regretted working under him.

    Speaking with our correspondent, Emeka Aforka described the allegations against him as mischievous, character assassination and calculated attempt by some individuals to undermine his integrity.

    His reaction was contained in a letter he wrote to Governor Obiano in which he said he was very aware of an attempt by an unnamed stakeholder in the local government to smear his image because of his popularity.

    Aforka said when he was in office; he had cordial relationship with members of his cabinet and questioned why a petition should emanate, three months after he left office.

    The letter was attached with payment vouchers signed by members of his committee to disprove their allegation that he paid them N25, 000 monthly salaries.

    The chairman of the APGA youth wing in the local government, Sunday Ileka, told our correspondent that the disagreement of the major stakeholder who are fighting Aforka stemmed from the sharing formula of APGA positions in the area.

    The refusal of Aforka to be part of the injustice, according to him, was the reason for his travails.

    He said the stakeholders invited nine people for a meeting in a hotel in Awka where he made it clear that the party leader in the area must come from his ward and that was where myself and Aforka disagreed, thus, the battle” Ileka said.

     

    QUOTE

    Nobody will ever do miracle; he did his best for the people of our local government, especially in my community where he did palliative work on the devastating erosion that has given us headache in this area…One fact is that you cannot satisfy everybody no matter what you do. It is a common thing among our people to criticise but for Emeka Aforka, he did perform well

  • Who is in charge?

    Who is in charge?

    •Enugu State Governor Sullivan Chime owes the people a duty of adhering to provisions of the constitution as he jets out to seek medical treatment again

    Public officers have a duty to uphold the tenets of the constitution. At the inauguration of federal and state governments, the chief executives are made to swear to be scrupulously guided by the letters and spirit of the constitution. But, no sooner do they assume office than they engage in serial breach of the grundnorm.

    In Enugu State, Governor Sullivan Chime has ignored provisions of section 190 of the constitution that bind him to hand over the reins of government to the deputy governor “whenever he is proceeding on vacation or is otherwise unable to discharge the functions of his office…” The governor is mandated in such circumstances to transmit a letter to the Speaker of the state House of Assembly and, by that token, empower the deputy governor to assume all the powers of the governor as acting governor until he returns and transmits another letter to the House to report that he is fit and back to discharge such functions.

    The office of governor under the 1999 constitution is highly regarded and invested with so much powers and duties. Apparently in realisation that it must be kept running at all times, the makers of the constitution insisted that anyone contesting election to the office must have a running mate who would assume office with him as deputy governor. Both are sworn in to jointly serve the people.

    It is despicable that some governors flagrantly flout this unambiguous provision of the constitution by refusing to hand over to their deputies whenever they find themselves unable to discharge the functions of office, either on account of ill-health as is the case in Enugu, or when on annual vacation as is the case in other states.

    It could be argued that Chime might not have known that he would need to be flown out of the country for treatment, and that the time was therefore too short to transmit the needed letter to the Speaker, however, the fact that the Secretary to the State Government has been performing functions otherwise reserved for the governor is an indication that the governor has returned to an all-too-familiar path. It does not matter what the relationship between the two men is at the moment. The supreme law of the country leaves the governor no discretion in the matter. Unless and until a deputy governor is removed from office, he remains the number two citizen and is the alternate governor. He derives his powers, functions, duties and privileges from the people who elected him along with the governor, and the constitution.

    While wishing the Enugu State governor speedy recovery, we remind him and others breaching the law that anyone who disregards the constitution has committed an impeachable offence, and call on the state House of Assembly to swing into action by insisting that the deputy governor, Mr. Sunday Onyebuchi, assumes office as acting governor as soon as it is clear that Governor Chime is unlikely to return to office within the period allowed by law.

    Besides, the secrecy surrounding the health status of government officials is unhealthy. As of the time of this article, the governor or his staff has not issued a statement on his state of health. This kicks against transparency in office. When a man seeks votes, he becomes a public official and signs off much of his privacy. In other countries, bulletins are issued on the state of health of high officials who have to seek solutions to serious medical conditions.

    In recent times, Mrs. Hilary Clinton, as the American Secretary of State, made known her medical status and followed up by announcing that she would be standing down at the end of President Barack Obama’s first term. Nigerian officials must learn to toe the lines of probity, accountability, due process and the Rule of Law at all times.

  • Police charge Immigration boss for false information

    Police charge Immigration boss for false information

    The police have charged a Chief Superintendent of Immigration, Mr. Unaowo Ime Nta, to court for alleged fabrication of false evidence against the Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation (NTDC).

    According to the Police First Information Report (FIR) filed before the Chief Magistrate’s Court, Zone 6, Abuja, Nta, on May 10, 2010 wrote a petition against the NTDC Director-General, Otunba Olusegun Runsewe.

    He alleged that Runsewe forged some documents to defame some suspended directors in the NTDC.

    But investigation by the Force Criminal Investigation Department (FCID), Police Headquarters, proved otherwise.

    It was shown that Nta never attended any board meeting at the NTDC and that his complaint could not be substantiated, an offence contrary to Section 157 of the Penal Code.

    The police said the only nexus between the petitioner and the corporation was that he was posted to the corporation to represent the Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS) as a desk officer.

    In the Legal Advice by the Commissioner of Police (Legal/Prosecution) of the FCID and signed by Yahaya Abubakar, an ACP, the police recommended that Nta be charged for false information.

    In the advice obtained by our correspondent, Abubakar said: “The person who alleges must prove in line with sections 135, 136 and 137 of the Evidence Act. But since the complainants’ case can not be substantiated, the police have no option than to charge the complaint/suspect for false information as a deterrent to others of his likes.”

    He also directed that a letter be written to the Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS) on the development.