Tag: CJ

  • Nyako seeks court’s leave to sue CJ

    Former Adamawa State Governor Murtala Nyako has urged the Federal High Court in Lagos for leave to apply for an order of mandamus against its Chief Judge, Justice Ibrahim Auta.

    The order of mandamus is to compel him to release the case file in Nyako’s suit seeking to nullify his impeachment.

    The plaintiff had filed the suit alleging breach of his fundamental right to fair hearing by the seven-man investigation panel, which indicted him of 16 counts of gross misconduct leading to his impeachment on July 15 last year.

    Adamawa State House of Assembly, the chairman of the investigation panel, Buba Kaigama and Inspector General of Police Suleiman Abba are the respondents.

    Nyako had petitioned the National Judicial Council (NJC) and the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Mahmud Mohammed to probe Justice Auta for allegedly stalling judgment.

    He said Justice Bilikisu Aliyu of the court’s Yola Division heard parties in the suit on February 2 and adjourned till February 12 for judgment, only for the chief judge to call for the file.

    But the court’s Chief Registrar, Mrs Rosemary Oghoghorie, said on February 17 the case file was not seized but that Justice Auta only called for it to clear a petition dated February 3 sent to him by a party in the suit.

    “Until the case file is treated, it will not be released. The judge handling the case has not responded to the petition and until that is done, the case file will not be released. That is the right procedure to follow,” she said.

    Nyako, in his fresh application, said the seizure of the case file by Auta was intended to delay the judgment till after May 29 when his tenure would have elapsed, thus rendering the case a mere academic exercise.

    Nyako’s lawyer, Olukoya Ogungbeje said: “All efforts to make the respondent (Auta) return the case file for the judgment of the court to be delivered proved futile.

    “The respondent (Auta) has connived and colluded with the respondents in the case to deny the applicant justice. The suit is time-bound as the tenure of the office of the applicant is due to expire on May 29, 2015.

    “The plot is to obstruct the wheel of justice, forestall the delivery of the court judgment and postpone the evil day till after May 29, 2015 when the tenure of the applicant would have expired. The respondent is bent on frustrating the case of the applicant in a bid to render the outcome of the case academic.

    “The respondent, who ought to be fair, independent and unbiased, is now being used as a tool by the respondents to frustrate the case of the applicant, render the outcome of the applicant’s case academic and deny the applicant of justice.

    “It would be in the interest of justice to urgently hear and grant this application.”

    Auta was sued both in his personal and official capacities. The application is numbered FHC/CS/217/15 and dated February 26.

    The case has not been assigned to any judge and no date has been fixed for hearing.

  • CJ tasks Customary Court judges on ADR

    Customary Court judges have been urged to incorporate Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms in the adjudication of cases, reports ADEBISI ONANUGA

    No fewer than 76 customary court judges in Lagos State participated  in one-day workshop organised by the Lagos State Judicial Service Commission (JSC) on alternative dispute resolution (ADR).

    It had the theme: “Traditional Dispute Resolution in Nigeria: How relevant in Modern Days?”

    Those who spoke at the workshop include the Chief Judge, Justice Oluwafunmilayo Atilade; the Attorney-General, Ade Ipaye, serving justices of the state high court and lawyers, among others.

    The two business sessions were chaired by the Head of Administration of the High Court of Lagos State, Justice Opeyemi Oke and a Commissioner of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), Mrs. F. O. Iwajomo respectively.

    Justice Atilade, who was represented by Justice Kazeem Alogba, said what is known today as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) was the traditional way of resolving disputes.

    She urged customary court judges not to lose sight of the system in the dispensation of justice.

    Atilade said the system has become relevant in the modern day as a method of ADR that is fast spreading across the world.

    The CJ urged the judges to ensure that nothing hampers the relationship between litigants.

    She preferred relationships while dispensing justice in line with the objectives of the traditional way of delivering justice.

    Justice Atilade said when disputes are resolved amicably, the parties resume thier friendship, adding that this has helped to ensure peace in the homes and society at large.    “If the society is not at peace, if the homes are not at peace, then it would snowball on to every other activity in the society.

    “That is the way you should look at your jurisdiction and your work in the society. If you take it that way, then you would appreciate your essence in your office and in the delivery of justice in the justice sector,” she said.

    Lagos Attorney-General, Mr Ade Ipaye said any mechanism that facilitates dispensation of justice will always be counted as relevant.

    Ipaye described dispute resolution as part of the culture of every people.

    “Human beings, in the attempt to live together will experience conflict and as such, the people have always devised a way to resolve conflicts, Nigeria not being an exception,” he said.

    He said it was important for the customary court judges not to lose sight of the traditional way of dispensing justice amicably and in a friendly atmosphere.

    JSC’s Executive Secretary Mrs. Ayodele Odugbesan recalled that in the past, disputes were resolved traditionally at the Oba or Baale’s palace through discussions.

    According to her, in order to regularise the processes, it became necessary to codify the customs, traditions and the proceedings through the customary courts.

    “The judges sit down, the parties also sit down to discuss, they don’t go the whole hog of trial but they always settle amicably,” she noted.

    Justice Yetunde Idowu said customary courts can no longer exercise jurisdiction on issues relating to children in view of the provisions of the Child Rights Law that confers jurisdiction solely on family courts.

    Mrs. Bolaji Daodu defined the type of ADR that operates in the customary court  and traditional systems as arbitration, mediation, reconciliation and negotiation and that they have a binding effect on the parties.

  • Adoke, CJ seek commitment from judges

    Adoke, CJ seek commitment from judges

    Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Mohammed Adoke (SAN) and the Chief Judge of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Justice Ibrahim Bukar have urged judges to remain committed to their code of conduct and other virtues expected of judicial officers as courts in the country begin their legal year.

    They spoke in Abuja at an event to mark the beginning of the legal year of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    The AGF, who assured of the Federal Government’s commitment to reforming the criminal justice system for effectiveness, disclosed that both chambers of the National Assembly have passed the much awaited Administration of Criminal Justice Bill, now awaiting harmonisation. The Bill seeks, among others, to end delay in criminal trial by courts.

    Justice Bukar observed that this was an era of increasing challenges, requiring that all those involved in justice administration must do their best to see that justice does not elude anyone.

    He said: “At times such as this, we take pride in the fact that the rule of law remains an indefatigable pillar of our society. If we are able to continue our sustained struggle to see that justice does not elude anyone, then we would have been able to do all that the society expect from us.”

    Adoke, who was represented by a Senior Special Adviser, Prof Peter Akpeh (SAN) said the Federal Government has put in place necessary measures to secure all judges in view of the importance of their roles.

    Justice Bukar said the management of the High Court of the FCT, under his leadership has put in place necessary measures to ensure speedy adjudication of cases, boost staff morale and improve the performance of judges and other judicial officers within its jurisdiction.

    He said during the last legal year, judges were exposed to international training and the jurisdiction of the Magistrate and District Courts were expanded to enable them attend to more cases, while issues affecting other staff were attended to.

    Justice Bukar noted that 14, 969 cases were disposed, while 11, 606 are pending before the court out of the 26,575 cases recorded in the court during  the last 2013/2014 legal year, of which, 6, 946 were brought forward from the preceding year.

    On steps to enhance speedy administration of criminal justice, Justice Bukar said: “We have designated all the court houses in Apo to attend to criminal cases. Consequently, moving inmates around the FCT has become needless as with one stop, all inmates can be before their court.”

    He lent his voice to the call for an increased funding for the judiciary, while urging judges to continuously update their knowledge in order to discharge their duties satisfactorily.

    Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), who spoke on behalf of the body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs), commended the court for its achievements, urging it to speed up the delivery of rulings and judgments.

  • Nasarawa panel begins sitting as CJ rejects lawmakers’ request

    Nasarawa panel begins sitting as CJ rejects lawmakers’ request

    Nasarawa lawmakers have lost a major battle in their push to impeach Governor Tanko Al-Makura.

    Chief Judge (CJ) Suleiman Dikko has declined to disband the seven-man panel investigating the 16 allegations against Al-Makura.

    The panel held its inaugural sitting in Lafia yesterday in line with its mandate in Section 188(7) (b) of the 1999 Constitution.

    Panel Chairman Yusuf Shehu Usman said its session would be made public for residents to have first hand knowledge of the governor’s responses to the allegations.

    Al-Makura has engaged a nine-man legal team to defend his integrity  having complied with Section 188(5) of the 1999 Constitution, the Chief Judge said he could no longer interfere with the impeachment process.

    A source said: “There was no way the Chief Judge could stop the impeachment proceeding which had begun with the inauguration of the panel. So, he chose to allow the process to go on since the court is always there for the aggrieved.

    “He said disbanding the panel will lead to anarchy as those who are supporting the governor will accuse him of bias.

    “The CJ feels he has fulfilled his constitutional obligation; it is left to the panel to decide the prima facie of the allegations.”

    Al-Makura has argued that the CJ can no longer disband the panel.

    The governor, who spoke through his lawyer, Chief Udechukwu Nnoruka Udechukwu, (SAN), said the lawmakers’ call for the dissolution of the panel “is ridiculous.”

    Udechukwu, who is leading a team of lawyers, including Olufunke Aboyade (SAN) for the governor, spoke yesterday on the telephone from Lafia, Nasarawa State.

    He contended that under the constitution, the lawmakers could not ask for the disbandment of the panel, stressing that even the CJ, who constituted it, could no longer disband it, unless a court of competent jurisdiction orders him to do so.

    The senior advocate noted that impeachment is strictly governed by the Constitution, and the steps are contained in Section 188 (1) to (11) of the Constitution.

    In his view, the 20 lawmakers, who are behind the impeachment are acting in bad faith, motivated by base political considerations.

    “The Legislature can ill afford to propagate impunity and desperation,” he added.

    The members of the panel, inaugurated last Friday, are: Yusuf Shehu Usman (chairman), Mohammed Sabo Keana, Reverend Joel Galadima, Alhaji Abdu Usman, Samuel Chaku, Mohammed Sani Usman and Pastor Daniel Chaga.

    The state government yesterday asked the lawmakers to go to court if they are aggrieved over the composition of the seven-man panel.

    It said the Assembly could not approbate and reprobate at the same time on a constitutional issue.

    The government made its position known in a statement by the Senior Special Assistant (SSA) to the governor on Public Affairs, Hon. Abdulhamid Kwarra.

    The statement said: “Section 188 (subsection 5) of the 1999 Constitution as amended states

    that the Chief Judge of the state shall at the request of the Speaker of the House of Assembly appoints a panel of seven persons who in his own opinion are of unquestionable integrity, not being members of any public service, legislative house or political party.”

    “Nasarawa State government is of the position that the Assembly cannot probate and re-probate on a matter that is before His Lordship, the Chief Judge of the state.

    “Should the members of the state House of Assembly be aggrieved with the compliance of the Chief Judge of Nasarawa State with the provision of Section 188

    sub-section 5 of the 1999 Constitution, the right thing to do is for the House to go to the

    court of law to challenge the composition of the investigative panel”.

    On the relocation of the Assembly members to a guest house in Karu Local Government Area, the statement added: “The sitting was not in conformity with any democratic requirement because no rule of the House permits the sitting of the Assembly anywhere in the state to conduct legislative affairs. The sitting was, therefore, ill-motivated, illegal and of no effect whatsoever.

    “More so the Supreme Court has made a definitive declaration that the House of Assembly can only conduct its legislative functions in legally designated place in the state capital (Balonwu Vs Obi 2007 NWLR PT1008/488).”

    A lawyer, Chief Jibrin Okutepa (SAN), said the “purported proceedings held in Karu, and the resolutions passed by the 19 members were non-binding on any system”.

    “They have no right to question the constitution of the panel by the Chief Judge. They have no powers over the CJ, if they have grievances arising from the action of the CJ in the CJ’s compliance with the provisions of Section 188; they have the option to go to court.”

    Members of governor’s nine-man-man legal team are: Chief U. N Udechukwu (SAN), lead counsel, Olufunke Aboyade (SAN), Prof. Ernest Ojukwu, Mr. Kehinde Aina, Esq; O. O. Adeleye, Esq, Olatoye Akinbode, Abdulwasi Musah, , C. I. Mbachu and Jamin Nwosu.

  • Nasarawa CJ under pressure to disband impeachment panel

    Nasarawa CJ under pressure to disband impeachment panel

    Desperate to impeach Nasarawa State Governor Umaru Tanko Al-Makura, lawmakers sat yesterday outside Lafia, the state capital, with a mace allegedly procured from the National Assembly.

    The Assembly held the session against the advice of President Goodluck Jonathan that the lawmakers should halt the impeachment.

    At the curious sitting, members of the Assembly asked the Chief Judge, Justice Suleiman Dikko, to disband the seven-man investigative panel looking into the allegations against the governor.

    The members of the panel, inaugurated last Friday, are Yusuf Shehu Usman (chairman), Mohammed Sabo Keana, Reverend Joel Galadima, Alhaji Abdu Usman, Samuel Chaku, Mohammed Sani Usman and Pastor Daniel Chaga.

    The Assembly, The Nation learnt was uncomfortable with the composition of the panel, which the Chief Judge set up in line with Section 188(5) of the 1999 Constitution.

    The section states: “Within seven days of the passing of a motion under the foregoing provisions of this section, the Chief Judge of the state shall at the request of the Speaker of the House of Assembly, appoint a panel of seven persons who, in his opinion, are of unquestionable integrity, not being members of any public service, legislative house or political party, to investigate the allegation as provided in this section.”

    In spite of the fact that the panel is made up of non-partisan members, the dissatisfied lawmakers relocated to Karu Local Government Area, near their new base in Abuja, to sit.

    The lawmakers asked the Chief Judge to disband the seven-man probe panel which they  alleged was “tilted in favour” of the embattled governor.

    A source said: “They rejected the composition of the panel by claiming that it would not be able to look into the allegations against the governor without bias.

    “They have asked for the reconstitution of the investigative panel by the Chief Judge who had insisted on substantial compliance with the law.

    “They wanted the CJ to raise a panel made up of only PDP members or those who have an axe to grind with the governor. But the Chief Judge appointed panel members with unquestionable integrity.”

    According to the source, the game plan of the lawmakers is to create a stalemate which will not allow the panel to sit for three months as required by Section 188(7) (b) of the 1999 Constitution. “They want impeachment by ambush because they are afraid of the outcome of the panel”, he said, adding:

    “The idea behind yesterday’s sitting was to create an impression that the Assembly ordered the Chief Judge to disband the panel and recall the report on expiry of the constitutional period allowed for the panel and go ahead with the impeachment.

    “They are aware that the impeachment process ends constitutionally if the panel clears the governor of any wrongdoing on the 16 allegations of misconduct levelled against him.”

    It was gathered that some Abuja-based PDP leaders were behind the pressure on the lawmakers to go ahead with the impeachment.

    But it was not immediately ascertained on how the lawmakers procured the mace to sit in Karu.

    A highly-placed source said: “Some top members of the upper chamber of the National Assembly provided the logistics and the venue at the neighbouring Karu Local Government Area that was used during the sitting.

    Al-Makura’s spokesman Abdulhamid Kwarra said: “I want to tell you that these people are desperate to remove the governor. The mace that was used today is not that of the State Assembly but the National Assembly.”

    “Members of the Assembly have stopped using the President’s name but are now dropping the names of the Senate President and other members of the National Assembly from Northcentral Zone.”

    But the governor’s Special Adviser (Special Duties) Mohammed Abdullahi, said: “ I doubt whether the Senate President will condescend so low to support the subversion of the Nigerian Constitution…If truly he does, it’s unfortunate!”

    Armed boys yesterday invade the Nasarawa State House of Assembly complex in Lafia and beat some of the lawmakers.

    The youths laid a siege around the complex and attacked the members, who they thought came around in connection with the impeachment move against Governor Al-Makura.

    The protesters demanded the immediate suspension of all impeachment proceedings.

    People who work in the building were barred from the Assembly Complex.

  • Lagos new CJ to be sworn in next month

    Lagos new CJ to be sworn in next month

    History will be made in Lagos State next month when Justice Funmilayo Atilade succeeds her sister Justice Ayotunde Pillips as the new Chief Judge.

    Justice Phillips bowed out on Saturday on attaining the mandatory retirement age of 65.

    Justice Phillips and Justice Atilade are daughters of the late Justice James Williams, who was a judge in Lagos.

    It was learnt that Justice Atilade may be sworn in before the new legal year 2014, which begins on September 2, to mark her first major official assignment and outing.

    Sources said the in-coming chief judge would appear before the House of Assembly for screening in a few days. All handing over processes were completed last week by Justice Phillips.

    Justice Atilade will become the 15th Chief Judge of Lagos State and the fifth woman to occupy the post.

    Her female predecessors include Justice Rosaline Omotosho, who occupied the office between 1995 and 1996. She was followed by Justice Ibitola Sotiminu (2001 and 2004); Justice Inumidun Akande (2009 – 2012) and Justice Phillips (2012-2014).

    Justice Atilade was born in London on September 24, 1952. She attended Ladi-Lak Institute in Yaba, Lagos Mainland; Anglican Girls Grammar School, Surulere, 1965 and 1969 and Queens College, 1970 and 1971.

    She proceeded to the University of Lagos in 1972 and graduated in 1975 with a Law degree. She passed out of the Nigerian Law School in 1976.

    Justice Atilade was State Counsel, Federal Ministry of Justice between 1977 and 1979; Principal Legal Officer, Nigerian Ports Authority 1979 to 1981; and a Senior Magistrate Grade 1,  1981 to 1996. She was appointed a judge on July 19, 1996.

    She became the Head Judge in June 2012, also occupied by her sister, Justice Phillips before her elevation as the chief judge.

    One of the most important professional courses attended by Justice Atilade  is Administration of Courts in the United States between June and July 1990.

    She is a member of the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA), International Bar Association (IBA) and Ikoyi Club 1938.

    Jusice Atilade, whose hobbies include travelling, aerobics and music, has three children.

  • Ondo CJ withdraws tax circular

    Ondo CJ withdraws tax circular

    The Ondo State Chief Judge, Justice Olasehinde Kumuyi, and the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA)have agreed on the need to stop the implementation of the tax circular.

    This is coming two months after lawyers started boycotting courts over the circular.

    The circular insisted on production of tax clearance as a compulsory pre-condition for bail of accused persons standing trial.

    The decision was reached at the end of the meeting called by the CJ at Judges’ Recreation Centre, Alagbaka, Akure with leaders of the NBA in the state.

    Members of the Bar also agreed to suspend the two months old boycott of Courts.

  • Benue CJ praises agency’s contribution to justice reform

    The Chief Judge of Benue State and the state’s Solicitor General (SG) wn case in full and that he will be denied the right to fair hearing. For this reason, this application cannot sail through. Consequently, it is accordinglyand Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Justice,  Justice Iorhemen Hwande and Mrs Christy Anageende have praised the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) over its support in enhancing reform in the state’s justice sector.

    They spoke at the recent action planning workshop for the Benue State’s justice sector held in Makurdi by the UNODC under the “Support to the Justice Sector in Nigeria” project funded by the European Union (EU).

    The state’s CJ, who was represented by Justice Aondover Kaka’an said EU and UNODC’s support is uplifting the judiciary and enhancing the quick delivery of justice in Benue State.

    UNODC’s Outreach and Communications Officer, James Ayodele in a statement, quoted the Benue CJ as saying “UNODC supported us in establishing the Judicial Research Center (JRC), and with the resources in the center the judges are able to access information that will enhance their work and help them dispense justice without delay.

    “Due to the implementation of the action plan drawn up in 2008 with support from UNODC, we have increased pro bono services to individuals who cannot afford the services of a lawyer and this has enhanced smooth hearing of cases by the courts and reduced the number of awaiting trial inmates in prisons,” he said.

    Ayodele also quoted  Mrs Anageende as saying “I know the importance of this work planning workshop and I want to appreciate the efforts of the European Union and UNODC. I have no doubt that Benue State will benefit immensely from this workshop and the project.”

    The focal person for the EU-UNODC justice project in the state, Justice Polycarp Kwahar said “some of the reforms we included in the 2008 work plan looked impossible. For instance, the establishment of the JRC; it was capital intensive, but with the support of EU and UNODC and the effort of the Chief Judge we were able to establish it.”

    The National Project Officer Justice Sector Reform at UNODC, Mrs Ugonna Ezekwem, said Benue State is particularly important to the EU and UNODC because of its outstanding performance during the last EU-funded project implemented in the state.

    “A lot of the reforms implemented in Benue State with support from EU-UNODC during the previous justice sector reform project have been sustained and the activities in the 2008 action plan are still being implemented, so we are very happy to be back here to advance these reforms.

    “Action planning will encourage the justice sector in supported states to plan strategically for reforms and to monitor and evaluate their performance over a period of time,” Mrs Ezekwem said.

    Ayodele explained that under the EU funded project, UNODC is supporting the development and implementation of state-level action plans for justice sector reforms in nine states and the Federal Capital Territory of Nigeria.

  • CJ: NDIC, judiciary cooperation paying off

    The cooperation between the Nigeria Deposit Insurance  Corporation (NDIC) and the judiciary is yielding result, Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Ibrahim Auta has said.

    The exclusive designation of judges to handle NDIC cases has resulted in timely dispensation of judgments and sustained the competence and specialisation of designated courts, he said.

    Speaking at a sensitisation seminar for Federal High Court Judges organised by NDIC in Abuja, Justice Auta said judges had been exclusively designated to handle NDIC cases.

    He pointed out the seminar had enlightened the bench on the mandate and activities of the corporation which, according to him, had resulted to more proactive and accurate adjudication of insolvency disputes.

    Also speaking during the conference, NDIC Chief Executive Officer, Umaru Ibrahim said the corporation will continue to collaborate with the judiciary in the discharge of its mandate to enhance financial system stability, , has said.

    In his keynote address with the theme: “The challenge to deposit insurance law and practice”, Ibrahim said NDIC observed that the public had a wrong perception of its statutory mandate.

    Hence, he said, time and valuable resources were invested to reverse the trend through effective and continuous public awareness and close collaboration with key stakeholders.

    Ibrahim recalled the corporation’s sponsorship of a similar seminar last year where about 53 judges of the Federal High Court participated.

    He said the corporation was not oblivious of the fact that some judges that benefited from the last seminar had been elevated to the Court of Appeal or had retired and new ones appointed.

    He said the second run of the seminar was organised by the corporation to consolidate on the gains of the previous edition and to strengthen its relationship with the courts in the interest of bank depositors and Nigeria’s financial system.

    Justice Auta added that the exclusive designation of judges to handle the NDIC cases had resulted in timely dispensation of judgments and sustained the competence and specialisation of designated courts.

  • Mind your conduct, CJ tells magistrates

    Mind your conduct, CJ tells magistrates

    Lagos State Chief Judge, Justice Ayotunde Phillips has sworn in 12. She advised them to respect their new office and mind their conducts. ADEBISI ONANUGA reports.

    At this point, you must realise that you have moved to the Bench. You have left the Bar. Those lawyers you used to gossip with, about the magistrates and about the judges, are now going to gossip about you.  So, remember all you said about us when you were on that side. Now they would say those things about you. You just have to pray that they have  good things to say about you and not bad things.

    “From this moment on, the clock starts to tick for you and your reputation is beginning to get formed and if you start off either as lazy or indolent or on a good note , that exactly is going to be your stigma until you retire. So you have been warned.  So, you are expected  to be mindful of your conduct and utterances henceforth and be dedicated to their new job.

    “I implore you, therefore, to ensure prompt and regular sittings at 9am, comport your self in a dignifying manner suited to your job template  and ensure that your social activities are regulated and suited to your new role. “

    With these words , the Chief Judge of Lagos State, Justice Ayotunde Phillips, swore into office 12 new magistrates in the state judicial system.

    Justice Phillips further said: “The standard expected of a judicial officer as espoused by the Code of Conduct for judicial officers would therefore, be embraced and observed by your honours. You must therefore familiarise yourselves with the Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers as this would serve as your steering wheel as you navigate the often turbulent judicial terrain.

    “The Code of Conduct specifically applies to all categories of judicial officers in the federation, including magistrates and provides standards for judicial activities, social relationship, administrative duties, occasional activities etc. The knowledge of the rules of this law book would prove invaluable in the years to come.  You would also soon come to realise that your reputation would precede you as court users easily tagged law officers as knowledgeable, incorruptible, trustworthy, efficient, rude, indolent or corrupt,” the Chief Judge stressed.

    The new magistrates comprise 10  women and two men. Their addition has increased the number of magistrates in the state to 119.

    They are: Feyikemi George; Abimbola Davies; Adenike Onilogbo; Funmilayo Dalley; Oluwatosin Ojuromi; Adenike Adepoju; Olanike Olagbende; Oluwabunmi Osibajo; Kofoworola Ariyo;   Adeola Erinle; Mr. Owolabi Lateef and Mr. Atanda Layeni.

    The swearing-in, which held penultimate week at the court room of the Chief Judge in Ikeja, had in attendance the Head Judge, Justice Funmilayo Atilade;  the Executive Secretary of the Lagos State Judicial Service Commission, Mrs. Ayo Odugbesan;  former Lagos  State Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Prof. Yemi Osibajo and his brother who once served in Ogun State, Mr. Akin Osibajo;  Lagos State Commissioner for Youth Hon. Waheed Oshodi; the State High Court Chief Registrar, Mrs.  Olamide Akinkugbe and her deputy in-charge of Administration in Ikeja, Mrs. Abisola Soladoye,  among others.

    Justice Phillips told the new magistrates that they were being sworn-in at a time when the work-load of magistrates have increased tremendously. “I dare say you would have a lot of work to do because there has been an increase in your jurisdiction to try tenants and landlord cases and criminal matters up to N10million,” she said.

    According to her, Section 28(1)(b) of the Magistrate Court Law 2009 particularly support the expansion of their jurisdiction adding, “this section provides that magistrates shall exercise jurisdiction in landlord/tenant matters where the annual rent overload does exceed N10million, but the claimants may in addition claim arrears of rent  in respect of the fact that the total claim does not exceed N10million.”

    She said their appointments would help to decongest the courts and ensure speedy and prompt dispensation of justice especially as it relates to pre-trial and awaiting trial syndrome in the prisons. “This is one area where I hope your honours would pay particular attention as quite a lot of work is in progress in ensuring  a minimum number of awaiting trial inmates in our courts,” she said.

    Justice Phillips told the new magistrates that Section 3 of the Magistrate Court Law 2009, provides a long list of offences triable under 17 various legislations in the state.

    She said: “These cases in addition to your regular jurisdiction would keep you extremely busy to justify your appointment at this time.”

    The new magistrates, she said, were selected from the best crop of the learned minds who applied for the position.  She expressed confidence that they would excel as magistrates in the state because they were picked from the best of the crops.

    To build their confidence in themselves about their new assignments, Justice Phillips recalled some of the best jurists who were also magistrates at some point in their career and rose to the exalted offices of the Chief Justice of the Federation. She listed them to include Justice (Sir) Darnley Arthur Alexander, retired state Chief Judges  such as Justice Joseph Adetunji Adefarasin,  Justice Olusola Thomas and Justice Adesegun, who were magistrates before they were elevated  to become Chief Judges.

    “So, you see, the sky is the limit for you if you apply yourself to your job.                                                                                                                                                         I urge you therefore, to be above board.  Section 2(2) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), provides that judicial powers  shall be vested in the courts,” she said.

    She said the section  which relates to Section 6(c) of the Constitution provides that the House of Assembly shall make laws. The combined effect of these two sections, according to her,  is that magistrate courts being one of such courts, where House of Assembly makes laws,  fall within the purview of this Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution.

    According to her, this fact is further reinforced by the Lagos State Magistrate Court laws, Section 4(2) thereof, which provides that all magistrates in Lagos State shall serve as judicial officer to the exclusion of other functions except as may be provided by law.

    The Chief Judge said the state judicial service commission has developed a training  curriculum for the new magistrates  to afford them the opportunity of learning skills required for their new office. She also enjoined them to empower themselves with the requisite skills for the job including, but not limited to the Lagos State Magistrate Courts Law 2009, the Administration of  2011, the Tenancy law as well as the Evidence Act and the Constitution, stressing that a mastery of them would ensure a hitch-free and smooth transmission from the bar to the bench.

    Responding on behalf of his colleagues, Mr. Lateef thanked the Chief Judge  for finding them worthy of the appointment. He  assured that they would do their utmost best to ensure fair and speedy dispensation of justice in the state and would not erode the confidence reposed in them. He said they would   be worthy examples of the magistrates in the state.