Tag: CJN

  • Don’t blame judges for delayed cases, says CJN

    •’Executive, Legislature should establish special courts’

    CHIEF Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Walter Onnoghen has exonerated judges for being the sole cause of delay in court cases.

    He spoke yesterday with State House correspondents after meeting with President Muhammadu Buhari at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    According to Justice Onnoghen, the responsibility of investigation and prosecution rest squarely with independent bodies.

    He explained that the responsibility of judges was to decide on the cases brought to them.

    To this end, he noted that it was unfair to blame judges for not expeditiously trying cases when they were always ready to listen to cases brought before them.

    The establishment of special courts for speedy adjudication of special cases, he said, was the prerogative of the executive in conjunction with the legislature.

    The judiciary, he said, only provides the manpower to handle the special courts.

    The CJN said he was at the State House to meet with the President, who had returned from the Commonwealth of Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in London and also to inform him on developments in the judiciary arm of government.

    Justice Onnoghen said: “I am here to felicitate with Mr. President. As you are aware, he has just returned from the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting at the head of Federal Government delegation and there is also the need for regular interaction to keep him abreast of latest development in the judiciary.”

    On the claim that the judiciary was not doing enough to ensure speedy trial of cases, he said: “Now, l believe that you know, with your experience of many years of practice that there has never been situation in which any case was taken to court and decided upon and the judge was not there to listen to the case or having finished hearing, he refused to deliver judgment.

    “So, when cases are not tried expeditiously and the judge is there, ready to listen to the case, you come and for one reason or the other, you take a date to adjourn the case, and the courts grants the adjournment, which is normal during proceedings, you cannot turn round and blame the judge for that.

    “These are the basic things that everybody must know. We must all work together and cooperate for the system to move forward. But if you keep thinking that the judiciary is the culprit in this delay process, you are not telling the whole story.

    “It is not the judiciary that would go and arrest someone before looking for evidence; it is not the judiciary that would go into investigations. No, we do not operate the inquisitional mode of justice as it is practiced by the French. Our own is that an independent body must investigate, prosecute while the judge decides.”

    Justice Onnoghen hailed the judges for doing good jobs despite some pockets of blames.

    “So far, so good. Under the circumstances, I must admit that so far, so good.

    “It is in order to enable you know the workings of the system that I set up the COMPRECO (Commission for the Prevention of Corruption) Committee. All along, everybody is passing buck, left, right and centre. The prosecutor is saying, ‘no it is not our responsibility; we are not the cause of the delay’. The investigator is saying, ‘l am not the cause’. The judge will say, ‘I am not the cause’.

    “So, the people must know who is actually causing the delay. That is why I set up that committee. And it is made up of the defense counsel, the prosecutor and the judiciary under the NJC.”

    On the claim that the judiciary was not on the same page with the executive in the ongoing fight against corruption, the CJN said the judiciary has good working relationship with other arms of government, especially the executive in the fight against corruption.

    He said: “I have answered that before and l still say the same thing. We are on the same page with the executive as well as the legislature. There are three arms of government and these three arms constitute the government. The government is not only the executive neither is it the legislature but it is the embodiment of the three.”

    Asked when special courts would be set up to try corruption cases, the CJN said: “It is the executive that has the prerogative in conjunction with the Legislature to establish courts under our constitution. It is not the duty of the judiciary nor that of the Chief Justice of Nigeria. If a special court or any court for that matter, the powers that decide to establish them, the judiciary will run it by providing the manpower required to run it.”

    He said the judiciary was working hard to decongest the nation’s prisons in its prisons reforms even as he noted that the prisons were populated by awaiting trials inmates.

    Justice Onnoghen added: “You are seeing everything being done on the issue. Next week, we are continuing with our action. But there is something you should know about prison decongestion. Now, there is the aspect about the constraints by the physical constraints in respect of the prison itself, how many people were to be contained in one prison, how many were there and how many are there now.

    “Secondly, you should also know that the actual prisoners are fewer compared with the total number you see there, which is mainly awaiting trial and that is where the aspect where prison decongestion is working on and l can assure you that this is being handled.”

     

     

  • Senate reports judge to CJN

    The Senate yesterday resolved to write to Chief Justice of  Nigeria(CJN) Justice Walter Onnoghen, over alleged excesses of some judicial officers in cases involving arms of government.

    Senators decided to draw the attention of the CJN to the ruling of an Abuja Federal High presided over by Justice Ahmed Mohammed which restrained the National Assembly from overriding President Muhammadu Buhari’s veto on the amendment of the Electoral Act, 2018.

    Justice Mohammed on Wednesday ordered parties in the suit not to take steps that would affect the res (subject) of the suit.

    The Court restrained the National Assembly from further action on amendment of the Electoral Act pending the determination of a suit filed before it by Accord Party.

    It further ordered parties to the suit to maintain status quo antebellum, at least between now and the next adjourned date, Tuesday.

    The Senate said that it was wrong for the court to stop the National Assembly from taking further action on the Electoral Act Amendment Bill.

    The resolution followed the adoption of a Point of Order raised by the Minority Leader, Senator Godswill Akpabio on the court order.

    Akpabio said: “I have perused the Constitution and I cannot see anywhere that the court has the power to stop the proceedings of the Senate.

    “If this is allowed, it therefore means that in future the court can stop the National Assembly from appropriating and the country will have no budget for that year.

    “Separation of powers is a core of democracy so there is need for the Chief Justice to caution legal officers on issuing such orders geared towards interfering with other arms of government.’’

    Senate Leader Ahmed Lawan said “Institutions should rather do things that should enhance our democracy. The issue at stake does not require court intervention because this is democracy at work. The court should hands off what we do in the National assembly. it is when we have finished and we have a law that the court feels that there are issues that they can interpret.’’

    The Senate leader added that though he voted against the Bill, the time was not ripe for the court to come into the matter when a law had not been made for its interpretation.

    Senate President Bukola Saraki  “The issue is clear and the principle is clear; what is important is building democracy and building our institutions.

    “We will come and go but the institutions will remain. So it is imperative that everybody must work towards sustaining the institutions. We will express our concern to the Chief Justice of Nigeria.’’

    When the matter was put to vote, it was overwhelmingly supported.

  • Judiciary saved Nigeria from collapse, says CJN

    Judiciary saved Nigeria from collapse, says CJN

    •Onnoghen asks judges to be abreast of law

    CHIEF Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Walter Onnoghen argued yesterday that without the timely intervention of the judiciary in trying times, the country would have collapsed.

    Onnoghen, who stressed the importance of the judiciary in the country’s continued existence, urged judicial officers (judges and justices) to always be abreast of the present state of the law to ensure effective justice dispensation.

    The CJN noted that public confidence in the judiciary and its legitimacy would remain threatened where judicial officials were unable to appropriately interpret the law.

    He spoke in Abuja yesterday at the opening session of a workshop for judicial officers from the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and Federal High Court on provisions of the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development (NOGICD) Act.

    The workshop, with the theme: “The role of the judiciary in the effective development of Nigerian content in the oil and gas industry”, was put together by the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB), the National Judicial Institute (NJI) and a private entity, Juris Law Office.

    Onnoghen said: “Nigerian judiciary is instrumental in ensuring stability in the oil and gas sector by interpretation of the relevant laws to the industry.

    “I make bold to say, without any fear of contradiction, that the Nigerian Judiciary is a key partner in ensuring stability in the oil and gas sector by interpretation of the relevant laws to the industry.

    “Indeed, the adjudicatory duty of a judge can only be performed optimally when he remains up-to-date with the emerging developments and trends in jurisprudence pertaining to the oil and gas sector.

    “You must be seen to be knowledgeable in the law and be in charge of your courts to ensure speedy resolution of disputes which in turn serves to assure investors and other major players in the oil and gas industry that their investments are safe,” Onnoghen said.

    The CJN, who hailed recent policies in the oil and gas sector, said such reforms were informed by government to promote local content in the provision of technology and manpower to the downstream sector.

    Onnoghen said the workshop was intended to ensure that judicial officers  were abreast of the role of the Judiciary in dealings with issues in the oil and gas sector.

    One of Onnoghen’s processors, Justice Alfa Belgore, noted that the NCDMB had before now, deplored the carrot and stick approach in enforcing compliance with the local content law administratively.

    He said with the enactment of the law on local content, it was now appropriate for the judiciary to use stick in line with the rule of law to ensure total compliance.

    NJI’s Administrator, Justice Rosaline Bozimo was of the view that judicial officers were required to possess adequate knowledge and skills on oil and gas to efficiently adjudicate on the cases that may come before them.

    Bosimo, who was represented by NJI’s Secretary, Abubakar Maidona, urged judicial officers to be proactive in the discharge of their constitutional duties by not allowing technicalities stand in the way of substantive justice, especially with regard to oil and gas disputes, which result to  huge financial costs to litigating parties.

    NCDMB’s Executive Secretary Simbi Wobote urged the judiciary to assist his agency to achieve its objective of creating wealth for local businesses and jobs for teeming populace in line with the law.

  • Osinbajo, CJN, Saraki for NBA Criminal Justice conference

    Osinbajo, CJN, Saraki for NBA Criminal Justice conference

    Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo (SAN), Senate President Bukola Saraki and  Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Walter Onnoghen are among dignitaries expected at the fifth NBA Criminal Justice Reform Conference.

    The three-day event, which will hold in Asaba, Delta State from March 21 to 24, is organised by the NBA Criminal Justice Reform Committee chaired by Chief Arthur Obi-Okafor (SAN).

    House of Representatives Speaker Yakubu Dogara, Chief of Army Staff Gen.  Tukur Yusuf Buratai, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman Professor Mahmood Yakubu and Delta State Governor  Ifeanyi Okowa, among others, are expected to speak at the event.

    Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Acting Chairman Ibrahim Magu, Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) Executive Secretary Prof Bolaji Owasanoye, and a professor of law Yemi Akinseye-George are among those expected.

    Osinbajo will present the keynote address at the showcase session on the theme: Criminal Justice in Nigeria: the journey so far.

    Former NBA President Mr Joseph Daudu (SAN) will chair the first session on “unlocking the innovations of criminal Justice legislation in the country”.  Chief Judge of the Federal Capital Territory, Justice Ishaq Bello, will be the keynote speaker.

    The second session will focus on “arrest, remand and awaiting trial syndrome in criminal justice: fixing the jigsaw to end prison congestion”. It will be chaired by the Chief Judge of Delta State, Justice M. Umukoro. Former Delta State Deputy Governor Prof Amos Utuama will be the lead speaker.

    Day two of the conference will commence with break out sessions, which will examine different perspectives of criminal justice administration. Panel A, to be facilitated by Prof. Akinseye-George, will examine the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015.

    Panel B, to be facilitated by Mr. Charles Ajuyah (SAN), will examine the ACJA and interlocutory proceedings. Panel C, to be facilitated by Mr. Akingbola Hanadeniran, will look at disclosure protocols under the ACJA.

    Former NBA president Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) will chair the fourth session, which will examine the topic: “Corruption: EFCC, Special courts to the rescue”. Lead speakers include Magu and Prof Owasanoye, who was nominated as ICPC chairman, but is yet to be confirmed by the Senate.

    Former United Nations (UN) Rapporteur on Human Trafficking, Prof. Joy Ezeilo, will chair the fifth session on “human trafficking and transnational  crimes: institutional and legal remedies”.

    Discussants will include National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP) Director-General Julie Okah-Donli and Gen.  Buratai.

    Panelists will include Immigrations Comptroller-General, Mr. Mohammed Babandede, State Security Services (SSS) Director-General, Lawal Musa Daura, National Intelligence Agency (NIA) Director-General Amb. Mohammed Dauda and Chief Anthony Idigbe (SAN).

    Chief Judge of Anambra State, Justice Peter N.C. Umeadi, will chair the sixth session on “prosecution and punishment of electoral offences in Nigeria”.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Corruption: CJN unfolds 13 reforms as judges get travel guide

    Corruption: CJN unfolds 13 reforms as judges get travel guide

    THE judiciary is not relaxing the efforts to restore its pride, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, has said.

    Backlog of cases, delayed proceedings and corruption allegations agaisnt officers are some of the stains the institution has been battling to remove.

    Unfolding 13 reforms designed to sanitise the judiciary and rid it of corruption, the CJN said he must henceforth approve all overseas’ trips by judges.

    The CJN, who spoke yesterday at the “Dialogue of organs of government on campaign against corruption and reform of the justice sector at the Presidential Villa in, Abuja, said all travels outside Nigeria by judges will now be with his permission after an application would have been made.

    The forum was organised by the Prof Itse Sagay-led Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC).

    Onnoghen also directed the court at any level to award punitive cost for frivolous litigation or delays caused by counsel.

    In the reforms, judges are now all to go to work and sit in their courts from Monday to Friday from 9am to at least 4pm.

    He listed the reforms in an address read by the President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa.

    Onnoghen said:  “In the recent past, the judiciary has been accused of corruption along with the allegation that when complaints of corrupt practices and unprofessional conducts are brought before the National Judicial Council (NJC), the Council shields or delays investigating the allegations so levelled against judicial officers.

    “Without considering the merit or otherwise of the criticisms, it goes without saying that the judiciary, like every other human institution, needs a rejigging every now and then to improve the functionality of the institution towards a speedy delivery of justice.

    “I have recently authorised the issuance of a set of reforms which ultimate objective is the speedy and transparent delivery of justice.

    “The delay in our justice delivery system is of great concern to me. This unacceptable situation inevitably dictates the need for a thorough and comprehensive reform of our justice sector to ensure access to justice at affordable costs and within a reasonable time

    “Such a reform agenda must of necessity require the cooperation of the three arms of government, namely; the Executive, the Legislature, and the Judiciary, as well as other relevant stakeholders

    “The reforms I have introduced cover a wide range of issues; from establishing new modalities for appointment of judicial officers, to tightening judicial discipline regulations, and fashioning out a speedy way to clear backlog of cases, among others.

    “Clearly, any unnecessary delay of justice is equally an act of corruption. Therefore, to enhance speedy dispensation of justice, we are ensuring that the Rules of Court Procedure must contain a provision for the award of punitive cost by the court for frivolous litigation or delays caused by counsel.

    “In the same vein, I am reviving and strengthening the Inspectorate Division to go round the country and ensure that, in line with Public Service Rules, all judicial officers go to work and sit in their courts from Monday to Friday from 9am to at least 4pm.

    “And, in line with the NJC’s Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers, I have directed that travels outside Nigeria should be with the permission of the Hon. Chief Justice of Nigeria, after an application would have been made.

    “For enhanced performance, all Judges of Lower Courts in the country have been directed to submit Returns of Cases quarterly to the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) for assessment as it is done by the National Judicial Council (NJC) in respect of serving Judicial Officers of Superior Courts of Record.

    “The area of appointment, all judges of lower courts and other public officers such as chief registrars and secretaries, among others, are henceforth required to write examinations and be interviewed, in addition to submission of copies of their judgments to the NJC when they are to be considered for judicial appointment.

    “For members of the Bar who seek judicial appointments, the President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) will, in addition to the requirements in the NJC Guidelines on Appointment of Judicial Officers, assist the NJC with a separate assessment report on all NBA candidates being considered for judicial appointment.

    “In the area of discipline, members appointed to serve in any fact-finding committee will henceforth be expected to complete their investigation and report their reports within 21 days.

    “And, considering the increasing number of petitions written against judicial officers, we will constitute more committees to investigate the allegations therein.

    “We have a lot more in our agenda to strengthen and reposition the judiciary, but suffice it to say that fighting corruption is not the responsibility of any particular arm of government but that of every citizen of Nigeria.

    “Corruption or any other form of injustice, for that matter, thrives in a culture of impunity. To carry out a successful campaign against corruption, we have to fight the culture of impunity which is an attitudinal phenomenon. If we allow the rule of law to reign, then there will be a dramatic reduction in corruption and injustice.

    “Corruption starts with a decision by an individual or a group of individuals to do the wrong thing. It is as simple as that. Corruption is never an accidental act. The person who commits a corrupt act has an option to do the right thing.

    “As a democracy, Nigeria is guided by the Rule of Law where the Constitution is the ground norm. It is pertinent to mention that there is no ambiguity concerning the role of the judiciary in our Constitution. It is an arbiter between parties. The core issue in the mind of an arbiter is for justice to be done and seen to be done.

    “Corruption in the judicial arm of government happens if an arbiter, in this case a magistrate, a judge, a justice or a panel, having heard from all parties and having determined where justice lies, decides to do the wrong thing by giving judgment to favour a particular individual or party over another.

    “On the part of the judiciary, the NJC under my watch has constituted the Corruption and Financial Crimes Cases Trial Monitoring Committee (COTRIMCO) under the chairmanship of Hon. Mr. Justice Suleiman Galadima, CFR, JSC (rtd), to serve as a check on the excesses of some bad eggs in the Judiciary. I am confident that in due course of time; our efforts to rid the Judiciary of questionable persons shall yield results.

    “To match words with action, we did not just set up COTRIMCO but we have devoted a 20 per cent of our already lean budget in the Judiciary to the committee to ensure their mandate is effectively executed.

    “I have also issued a directive to all heads of courts to designate some courts in their jurisdictions as Special Courts to handle corruption cases. This is a step in the right direction as lingering corruption cases will be expeditiously dispensed with.”

    He reminded Nigerians that their collective efforts would be required to tackle the monster called corruption.

    Onnoghen said: “Every individual must resolve to do the right thing, at the right time and without compulsion if we are determined to fight the scourge of corruption to a successful finish.

    “Whatever solutions the experts will proffer at the end of this dialogue, let me add this, establishing a reward system in all strata of our society to encourage the good in us, will go a long way to encourage the values of honesty, hard work and integrity.

    “More importantly, we must, as a nation, humble ourselves in prayer, turn from our evil ways and find our way back to God.”

    The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Anti-Corruption, Chukwuka Utazi, said: “There is too much lip service to the fight against corruption. We need to do more to strengthen our anti-corruption agencies to discharge their duties to all whether you are in the ruling or opposition party.”

    On his part, Justice A.D. Yahaya of the Court of Appeal said: “If PACAC was not there, Nigeria would have been at the worst end in corruption.

    “We keep talking about corruption. It is so endemic and it is alarming. The problem is the indiscipline with us. I am sorry for this country; I do not see any light at the end of the tunnel unless we face the campaign against corruption, the way it should be faced.”

     

    The Reforms

    • Establishing new modalities for appointment of judicial officers
    • Tightening judicial discipline regulations
    • Fashioning out a speedy way to clear backlog of cases
    • Speedy and transparent delivery of justice.
    • Rules of Court Procedure now to contain provision for the award of punitive cost by the Court for frivolous litigation or delays
    • Reviving and strengthening the Inspectorate Division to ensure judicial officers go to work and sit in their courts from Monday to Friday from 9am to at least 4pm.
    • President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) to assist the NJC with a separate assessment report on all NBA candidates being considered for judicial appointment.
    • All Judges of Lower Courts and other public officers such as Chief Registrars and Secretaries, among others, are henceforth required to write examinations before being appointed
    • To constitute more committees to investigate allegations against judges
    • All Heads of Courts to designate some courts in their jurisdictions as Special Courts to handle corruption cases
    • 20% of Judiciary Budget to be devoted to Corruption and Financial Crimes Cases Trial Monitoring Committee (COTRIMCO)
    • All travels outside Nigeria by judges will now be with the permission of the CJN after an application would have been made.
    • All Judges of Lower Courts in the country have been directed to submit Returns of Cases quarterly to the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC)
  • CJN commiserates with family of late Justice Musdapher

    CJN commiserates with family of late Justice Musdapher

    The Chief Justice of Nigeria ( CJN ), Justice Walter Onnoghen, has condoled with the immediate family of former CJN, Justice Dahiru Musdapher, who passed on early hours of Tuesday in a London hospital.

    Mr Awassam Bassey, Special Adviser on Media to the CJN, disclosed this in a telephone interview in Abuja.

    Bassey said the CJN had directed the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court to officially send his (Onnoghen) condolences to the immediate family of the late jurist.

    “The CJN had visited the late Justice Musdapher while on admission in a London Hospital. He has described his death as painful and a lost to the judiciary,’’ Bassey said.

    Read also: Ex- CJN Dahiru Musdapher dies at 75

    Musdapher was appointed the Chief Justice of Nigeria in 2011.

    He did serve as Chief Judge of the Kano State Judiciary from 1979 to 1985, and a member of the Court of Appeal from 1985 until 2003.

    The late jurist retired from the bench five years ago on attaining the mandatory retirement age of 70.

    He hailed from Bani Ya’muusa clan in Babura town in Babura Local Government Area of Jigawa State.

    NAN

  • CJN warns against  unguarded  comments

    CJN warns against unguarded comments

    Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Walter Onnoghen has expressed discomfort about public criticism of  the Judiciary for the confusion over the disputed Anambra Central Senatorial District seat.

    The CJN said since the case was still in court, it was wrong for members of the public to cast aspersions on the Judiciary for its handling of the case and others such cases.

    Justice Onnoghen, in a statement yesterday by his media aide, Awassam Bassey, said it  was contempt of court for anyone to discuss any matter pending in any court of law, and that the punishment for contempt may include a term of imprisonment.

    The statement said: “The Hon. CJN wishes to remind the general public that it is contempt of court for anyone to discuss any matter pending in any court of law in the country. The punishment for contempt may include a term of imprisonment.

    “To make matters worse, in such discourse, the language being used in describing the judgments of the courts is not only ungentlemanly, degrading and contemptuous, but amounts to uncharitable insults which should not be encouraged in any decent democracy.

    “It is in the light of the above that the Hon. CJN continues to encourage parties and the general public to use only lawful means in the pursuit of remedies for their real and imagined grievances.”

     

     

  • NJC receives 1,124 corruption cases, says CJN

    NJC receives 1,124 corruption cases, says CJN

    Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Walter Onneghen yesterday said the National Judicial Council (NJC) had received a list of 1,124 corruption cases from various jurisdictions.

    Onnoghen stated this in Abuja at the inauguration of the Corruption and Financial Crime Cases Trial Monitoring Committee (COTRIMCO).

    The CJN said the cases were received from the jurisdictions in compliance with the NJC directive.

    “The Heads of Court were directed to compile and submit a compendium of corruption cases being handled by their various jurisdictions.

    “I also directed them to designate a court or more in their jurisdictions, depending on the volume of such cases, solely for the trial of such cases,’’ he said.

    The CJN advised members of the committee to help eliminate delays and its attendant effects on the speedy disposal of corruption cases.

    “Needless to say that the nation expects so much from this committee, going by the avalanche of positive responses and recommendations that have greeted its setting up.

    “We, therefore must do all we can to justify this high level of public confidence reposed in the committee.

    “The committee is expected to among other things propose practical directions for my consideration and approval in order to complement the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA),’’ Onnoghen said.

    The NJC on Tuesday appointed retired Supreme Court Justice Suleiman Galadima as the Chairman of the committee to replace

    Justice Ayo Salami who excused himself as chairman.

    The CJN said: “The committee was initially billed to be headed by His Lordship, Hon. Justice Ayo lsa Salami, OFR, former President of the Court of Appeal. Having earlier given his consent, we regret that His Lordship is unable to assume the Leadership of the Committee for personal reasons.

    “We do hope however that His Lordship, Hon. Justice Ayo Salami, OFR, will in the near future, be available to offer the judiciary in particular and the nation in general the benefits of his wealth of experience.”

    Members of the committee are Chief Judges of Borno State, Justice Kashim Zannah; Imo State, Justice P.O. Nnadi; Delta State, Justice Marshal Umukoro; and Oyo State, Justice M. L. Abimbola.

    Also named among the members are the current President of the Nigeria Bar Association, Mr. Abubakar Mahmoud, and some of his predecessors – Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), Mr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), Mr. Joseph Daudu (SAN). and Mr. Augustine Alegeh (SAN).

    Others include two members of the NJC, Dr. Garba Tetengi (SAN) and Mrs. R.I. Inga; representative, Non-Governmental Organisations, representative, Ministry of Justice, and the representative, Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria.

    The Secretary of NJC, Gambo Saleh, will serve as the secretary of the committee.

    Galadima expressed delight on their appointment to serve, adding that the committee would not fail the nation.

  • FG to win anti-graft war – Sagay

    FG to win anti-graft war – Sagay

    The Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Prof. Itse Sagay, on Thursday expressed optimism that the Federal Government would win the ongoing fight against corruption.

    Sagay, who is a constitutional lawyer, said this in Lagos.

    He spoke on recent directive given by Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Walter Onnoghen, to judges, asking them to ensure success of the anti-graft campaign.

    Sagay said the CJN should undertake in-depth study of judicial officers, with a view to fishing out “bad eggs” in order to give the war against corruption the needed push to succeed.

    He said the war was multifaceted requiring thorough work, and expressed optimism that the government would surmount every obstacle clogging the wheels of justice.

    “We are very concerned about the judiciary because without them, we simply kiss the anti- corruption war goodbye. So we must have a competent judiciary otherwise, they will keep messing up corruption cases.

    “A number of judges take decisions and interfere with ongoing corruption cases which in my view indicates their hostility for the anti- corruption war.

    “The government is very much aware of some of these practices but as you know, this is a law abiding government which believes so much in the rule of law and allows itself to be guided by it.

    “I am optimistic that government will achieve victory in its war against corruption; so for the new legal year, I urge the Chief Justice of Nigeria to look keenly at his officers and those who are found incompetent, should be eased out of the system.

    “More so, if we can get the National Assembly to pass the Special Criminal Court bill into an Act, then, it will be settled that only qualified judges with ‘established’ reputation for integrity, honour and honesty will be appointed there,” Sagay said.

  • Now, the CJN is talking!

    The current Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, arrived at a most inauspicious time in Nigerian judicial history.

    Apart from sectional, North Vs South, bickering over his appointment — no thanks to his rather long acting period — he debuted at the height of perceived unparalleled graft in the judiciary.

    Indeed, so thick was the negative perception of the Judiciary, among, to use that legal-speak, “right-thinking members of the society”, that a columnist with The Nation weighed in with a rather irreverent piece: “His Lordship, the rogue”!

    In the classical times of the Nigerian judiciary, with the likes of “Socrates” Justice Chukwudifu Oputa, pristine “whistle-blower” on “billionaire judges”, Justice Kayode Eso, legal Titan and one-time Chief Justice of Botswana, Dr. Akinola Aguda, Justice Andrews Otutu Obaseki and other Titans of yore, pulling the strings during that golden era, that would have been an intolerable affront.

    But that piece met a country in foul and baleful mood, despite denials and rationalizations from the Bench and the Bar: the judiciary was a haven for baron judges and lawyers, that saw Justice as just another line in soulless racketeering!

    The CJN came in; and his body language, for quite some time, was that of one who would rather err in defending the status quo, rot, warts and all; than jump in as a flaming and ferocious angel, waving the fiery sword of reforms.

    To his left was the Buhari Presidency, charging the CJN and his National Judicial Council (NJC) with culpable indifference, in its anti-corruption war; inside and outside the Judiciary.  The tormentor-in-chief was Prof. Itse Sagay, the chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC).

    To his left was the impatient media — or at least, a section of it — which quickly made up its mind that the Judiciary was colluding with crooks to evade justice; and that the CJN’s body language was not about to change anything.

    The CJN was right in the middle, dodging, so to speak, the flak!

    Well, Hardball can happily report, things appear to be changing.  The CJN just not only read the riot act that judicial corruption would no longer be tolerated, he also outlined clear policy frameworks to walk that tough talk.

    At the inauguration of new silks, the Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs), the CJN announced the formation of new criminal divisions, from the high courts nationwide, to specially sit on corruption cases.  As the CJN was laying out his new plans, he thundered it would no longer be business as usual, for corrupt judges and lawyers.

    Though it’s early days yet — for implementation is usually a long walk from policy intentions, at least in these climes — Prof. Sagay is excited enough to thumb up the CJN and his new talk.  Not a few media analysts and commentators too, would likely feel upbeat at the new turn of events.

    Now, the CJN is talking!

    But even with this initial excitement, Hardball must warn that the CJN must back his rigorous talk with even a more vigorous walk.  Nigerians cannot wait for the conviction, after fair but speedy trials, of looters of public funds, who have beggared Nigeria and dispossessed Nigerians.

    That would be a fitting legacy for his tenure.