Tag: Committee

It is legitimate for Nigerians to express their disapproval of the conduct of the legislature and its members if they feel discomfited on any issue but what is certainly not acceptable is for some individuals to hide behind that prerogativeto dodge their own responsibilities to the nation or to even pursue personal vendetta.

One of such recent developments is the orchestrated media campaign against the Senate Committee on Customs, Excise and Tariff. About afourth night ago, I was in attendance at a public hearing organized by the committee in conjunction with that of (senate)  marine transport on the activities of some of the operators –both public and private – in that sector.

I was quite impressed with the way the session went, especially how the committee chairman, Senator Hope Uzodinma, handled proceedings. Anybody who witnessed that event would testify that the committee meant well but that it was bound to be misunderstood at best, or even be resisted by those who have vested interest in the organizations being investigated by the senate (through the joint committee) on a N30 trillion scam in the import and export circle.

One of the government agencies being investigated is the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) on the allegeddisappearance of over 282 vessels from Nigerian ports without a kobo collected from them. Consequently, the investigating committee invited the current chief executive officer of the organization,HadizaBalla-Usman, to appear before it to answer somequestions relating to the matter. Four times the committee has invited her and four times she turned down the invitation.

Incidentally Ms. Bala-Usman is about the only head of the government agency that hasso far failed to honor the senate’s invitation.Perhaps out of frustration,the committee chairman last week disclosed that the senate may be forced to issue an arrest warrant for heads of the defaulting organizations if they fail to appear at the next meeting.

Not unexpectedly, there are now attempts tointimidate the senate to stop the investigation.But it is being done in a most tactless manner. The NPA management, led by Bala-Usman seems to have chosen to make it a personal matter between it and the joint committee chairman, Senator Uzodinma.

Worse, their supporter in their chosen path, retired army Colonel Abubakar Umar, handled the matter badly.

He first went on a fairy tale on howUzodinma’s company imported rice and declared it as yeast. But when the Comptroller-Generalof the Nigeria Customs Service, another retired army Colonel, Hamid Ali, seized the goods, Uzodinma, according to his narrative, dragged him, to the senate plenary where Ali was, according to Umar, humiliated for not putting on his Customs service uniform.

Umar went on tolinkthe NPA matter with the face-offs between the senate and the Acting Chairman of the Economic andFinancial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ibrahim Magu, over the well-knownmatter concerning the latter’s confirmation.

But I ask: how is the issue of 282 missing vessels connected with Magu’sconfirmation or even the riceallegedly imported by Uzodinma? In his length press statement,Umar acknowledged that the senator’s rice is in the custody of the Customs; meaning that it is not among the items that disappeared from the ports.

Both by the design and default, Umar has painted Ms Usman as someone who is unwilling to take responsibility for things happening in the agency she is superintending. At a time when the buzz phrase is “not–too–young– to rule” or something like that,MsBala–Usman’s attitude to her job does great damage to her fellow youths and their current campaign to be given more opportunities in public office.

Worse, it puts the 35% affirmative action for women in great jeopardy. At her age (40), sheis expected to be bold and not attempt to hide under the indiscretion of a biguncle.It is not all youths in Nigeria who hanker for big responsibility that have a big uncle that can rush to the press with anill-conceived statement on their behalf.

And in trying to protect his daughter’s friend, assuming that is Umar’s main motivation,witness the superfluity with which he wrote: “The experience of HadizaBala–Usman, the new M.D of the NPA, is particularly sad. The more she tries to fight to reduce graft and perfidy, the more determined they seem to mobilize against her, to neutralize her and see her back”

If I were Usman, I would reject the use of such hyperboles to describe her testimonial in a job she has spent barely one year in. At what point will she stop fighting? Rather than “fight”, she should learn to build confidence in herself and the people she will come across in the course of her career.

Even more interesting is that Umar, in his enthusiasm to paint a gory picture, claimed that the NPA boss is also being fought because she is a woman.He wrote:”Unashamed, they question the wisdom of appointing a woman to such a post”.

As far as I am concerned, Umar has inadvertently let the cat out of the bag. Uzodinma does not come from a culture where people disapprove of the appointment of women to top positions.

Umar’s other goof is what he said about thedredging of the Calabar port, even though like the riceand Ibrahim Magu matters, it has nothing to do with vessels that disappeared.Yes, a company in which Uzodinma has interest, Messrs Niger Global Engineering and Technical Co. Ltd,is the junior partner in a joint venture company, the Calabar Channel Management Company – that is handlingthe dredging of the Calabar port,the NPA being the senior partner.But that project is not part of the ongoing investigation by the senate.

In other words, it is not part of the reasons Bala-Usman is being invited by the senate. So, bringing it up is just in a bid to rake in evidence to nail Uzodinma as an individual, not even to stand up to a perceived high handedness by the senate itself.How cheap?

This is more so as the company in reference was incorporated in 1995 and the contract in question advertised and procured in 2004, seven years before Uzodinma became a senator.

Interestingly, Umar in his statement claimed that “both the NPA subsidiary called Calabar Channel Management and … Niger Global Engineering and Technical Co. Limited were incorporated in 2014 just for this deal”.Umar went ahead to allege that the contract was awarded without due process and that faced with a rash of petition, “the NPA management under MsBala-Usman decided that national interest would be better served if the JV scheme as well as the so-called dredging project are terminated”.

National interestindeed! If Hajia Usman could summon the courage to unilaterally cancel a project of that magnitude, how is that she could not pick up the same courage to appear before a senate committee to answer mere questions? What happens to the potential beneficiaries of a fully dredged Calabar port which project, when completed, is expected to change the face maritime industry in Nigeria? Was the matter brought back to the federal executive council since no mention of that was made in Umar’s epistle to the Nigerian press last week?

Writing on the subject in the Daily Sun of Friday August 11 2017, one MajeedDahiruclaimed that the Jonathan administration handed over the Calabar port project to Messrs Niger Global Engineering and Technical Company Limited for asking. Apart from that the claim is a mere platitude, Dahiru is also a victim of the ill-conceived and hurriedly-put-together war against Uzodinma.

Had he conducted a simple check, he would have discovered that the Calabar port dredging project was advertised and procured in 2004, six years before Goodluck Jonathan became president and seven years before Uzodinma became a senator.

Thus like Umar, Dahiru is also being used to mislead the Nigerian public. But perhaps a more important question to ask is, if it took presidential intervention, even if it was a wrong step, to get the project started, is Usman now arrogating to herself presidential powers since, as admitted by Umar, she terminated the project entirely on her own volition.

If she has acquired so much power that she could unilaterally determine what is in “national interest”in just under one year in office; then it means that Umar is painting a wrong picture of her.It means that she is not at the receiving end as he wants us to believe.My advice is that the retired Colonel leaves this lady alone to do her job and grow.