Tag: Confusion

  • Confusion as building collapses in Lagos

    Confusion as building collapses in Lagos

    There was confusion in the Agege area of Lagos State, Nigeria yesterday as a another building caved in, and crumbled in the country’s commercial capital.

    The Nation learnt that the rain, which started around 11:45 a.m, was still falling when we heard a loud bang and came out of our houses to see the affected house in rubbles. It is an old house that was probably built about fifty years ago. Motorists and pedestrians were trapped while rescue operation lasted. Occupants of the affected house were seen struggling to salvage some of their belongings in the rain.

    “The rainwater penetrated into d foundation of the mud-constructed house that have been built over 50 years ago. Lagos State Building Control Agency has commenced marking of about 30 houses on the street with the intention of carrying out integrity tests on them immediately. This is necessary to ascertain the state of the remaining houses on the street,’ another source added.

    But more confusion broke out when youths from the area trooped out and stopped LABCA officials from marking the houses. Unable to withstand the large number of the protesting youths, the officials left with a promised to return on Monday to carry out the test.

    “At about 12:30 p.m on Saturday, a building, located at 14, Ijaye street, Alhaja One bus stop, near Abiola Market, Agege,  collapsed. No one was hurt as emergency rescuers and neighbours responded quickly. But the incident caused panic amongst residents of the area. But normalcy have since returned to the area after men of the Lagos Building Control Agency (LABCA) moved in to evacuate occupants immediately,” an eyewitness said.

  • Conflicting court orders stir confusion in Enugu

    In order from an Enugu High court and another from a Magistrate Court have thrown two claimants to the ownership and control of a petrol station in the New Haven, Enugu into confusion. The police are also mystified.

    The High Court in Suit No: E/70/2008 Mr. Bede Azubuike Agu and First Bank had on August 8, 2011 made an order of interim injunction restraining “the bank, its servants, agents, and/or privies from selling, giving effect to any purported sale, executing and/or purporting to execute any document in furtherance of any sale and/or perfecting and/or purporting to perfect any transaction relating to any purported sale of the service station of the Plaintiff situate at No. 195 Chime Avenue, New Haven, Enugu.”

    The court further restrained the bank its servants, agents or privies any person claiming through or from it from interfering with the plaintiff’s use of the service station.

    The plaintiff, Mr. Bede Azubuike, had approached the court seeking among other reliefs an order restraining First Bank from selling, auctioning, alienating or advertising for sale his landed property situate at No: 195 upper Chime Avenue, New Haven Enugu covered by Certificate of Occupancy No: LU/EN/39 and registered as No: 98 Page 98 in Vol. 975 in the Land registry.

    In a statement of defence and counter-claim, the bank prayed for other reliefs including an order for the immediate sale of the mortgaged property (the fuel station) and repayment of the principal sum and interest of the loan from the proceed of the loan.

    While the matter and order subsisted in the High Court the Plaintiff and owner of property Mr. Bede Agu was served with a claim dated 24th February 2012 emanating from an Enugu Magistrate Court in Suit No: MEN/125/2012 asking him to deliver possession of his fuel station describing him as a squatter and asking him to deliver possession of the said petrol station a certain Pinnacle Oil and Gas ltd, believed to have secretly bought the station from the bank.

    When the matter which was between Pinnacle oil and Mr. Bede Azubuike Agu came up at the Magistrate Court presided over by His Worship F.C Chukwu on April 2, 2012 Mr. Agu pleaded not liable to the claim of Pinnacle Oil and Gas ltd on the ground of his ownership of the fuel station sought to be recovered from him.

    He further produced his title documents evidencing his ownership of the fuel station but the court insisted that the issue before him does not border on title rather claim for possession or recovery of premises.

    Mr. Agu later filed a formal application praying the court to stay further proceedings on the grounds that the fuel station sought to be recovered from him was his bona fide property, that the fuel station was presently a subject matter of Suit No: E/70/2008 and that there was a subsisting order by the High Court in the same suit.

    The Magistrate Court dismissed the application and at the end of the hearing during which Pinnacle Oil and Gas ltd as well as Mr. Bede Agu gave evidence of conflicting claims of ownership of the fuel station the court by a judgment delivered on March 5, 2015 ordered Mr. Bede Agu to deliver immediate possession of the fuel station to Pinnacle Oil.

    Although Mr. Bede Agu has commenced process of Appeal and also filed and served a formal motion for stay of execution of the judgment of the Magistrate Court crisis has been brewing following alleged attempts to recover the fuel station.

    Both parties and even the police in Enugu are at a crossroads over what should be done bearing in mind that both orders of the two courts are dealing with the same subject matter.

     

  • Confusion over alleged order to probe Atiku, Tinubu, Amaechi, Saraki

    Confusion over alleged order to probe Atiku, Tinubu, Amaechi, Saraki

    The polity was gripped  by fresh tension yesterday  following the emergence of a  curious watch list purportedly sent to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) by the Presidency.

    The  EFCC dismissed the list as fake and  said it did not emanate from it.

    The list  alleged to be from the Chief of Staff to the President, Brigadier General  Jones  Arogbofa  (rtd) directed the EFCC to  probe  key opposition figures in the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Peoples Democratic Movement (PDM).

    They are ex-Vice-President Atiku Abubakar; Asiwaju Bola Tinubu; Speaker Aminu Tambuwal; Sen. Bukola Saraki; Governors Rotimi Amaechi, Adams Oshiomhole, Aliyu Wammako, Rabiu Kwankwaso, Abdulfatah Ahmed,  and Sen. Danjuma Goje.

    Others are the Governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress(APC) in Taraba State, Sen. Aisha Jummai Alhassan; the Governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Movement(PDM) in Adamawa State,  Dr. Ahmed Modibbo(Ex-Executive Secretary of UBEC); and a former Minister of Education, Prof. Ruqayyatu Rufai; Executive Secretary, PPPRA, Farouk Ahmed; CBN Deputy Governor (Operations ),  Suleiman Barau; Managing Director, NPA,  Habib Abdullahi; DG, NCAA, Capt. Mukhtar Usman; MD of NDIC, Umaru Ibahim;  GED, Business Development of NNPC, Attahiru Yusuf; and the GED, Commerce and Investment of NNPC, Aisha Abdulrahman.

    The list which the social media quoted with relish yesterday has generated serious controversy  despite the denial of the EFCC. Some political commentators and members of the opposition parties were of the view that nothing “ is beyond the presidency.”

    ” We have nothing to hide. Why have they waited till now if their motive is genuine ? Atiku and Tinubu left office in 2007 ,Goje and Saraki ceased to be governors in 2011,  they have all been in the country and nobody has invited them for questioning as regards their time in office. We know the game they are up to, “ a leading opposition politician said yesterday.

    The purported  memo directed EFCC to  ”clandestinely investigate the personal and official finances of the following present and former government functionaries and report back by the 16th of March.

    But the EFCC disowned the said letter in circulation, and claimed that it did not emanate from it.

    The Head of Media and Publicity of EFCC, Mr. Wilson Uwujaren, told reporters in Abuja that the memo was not only fake but was intended  to  ”create the impression that President Goodluck Jonathan wants to use the EFCC to witch-hunt opposition figures.”

    “The EFCC has not received such a letter from the presidency and it has not got any directive to witch-hunt any person and this commission under the leadership of Mr. Ibrahim Lamorde does not engage in vendetta. We do a professional job; we are not tele-guided by anyone or group.”

    Uwujaren  showed reporters  a memo  from the Presidency,pointing out the difference  between the features on the ‘genuine’ and  ‘fake’ letterheads.

    The APC had,  on February 28, raised the alarm  that its leaders were “being targeted by the Presidency  and the PDP in a planned  security clampdown ahead of the forthcoming elections.”

    It said at the time that the clampdown would be carried out by  the Department of State Security (DSS).

    The aim was to  scuttle or rig the elections in favour of the ruling party,it said,adding that under the alleged plan, the DSS  had “directed its state commands to compile and submit a list of stake holders  and key communicators of the opposition party in all the local government areas across the country.

    “The state commands were also directed to identify polling units and wards that are dominated by the opposition party’s supporters,especially in the units they scored above 60 per cent during the 2011 general elections.

    “Three thousand and eight officers and men of the DSS have been shortlisted to undergo intensive training in shooting and weapon handling in preparation for the operation.”

    The APC  also said warrants of arrest may have been procured in respect of those to be taken into custody ,and detention facilities  prepared for them.

    It was gathered that security agencies have been directed to  start digging deep into the past records and activities of  those for arrest with a view to “uncovering  their negative antecedents that could be used against them.”

    Also on Thursday,Asiwaju Tinubu alleged plans by the Presidency and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to eliminate or frame him up in a murder case before the coming  elections.

    His Media Office  said in Lagos that the motive  was  to halt the momentum the APC presidential standard bearer, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, is gathering, ahead of the March 28 and April 11 elections.

    It said  the Presidency and the PDP  were out to implicate the eminent politician and remove him from circulation with a view to weakening his  political influence nationwide and undermine his leadership in the politics of Southwest geo-political zone, which is perceived as the deciding factor during the presidential election.

    “ This part of the plot has two options. The first is  to employ trained snipers to attack Tinubu or assassinate him out right. This plan is consistent with the warning made by former President Obasanjo in his now famous 2014 letter to President Jonathan. Those within the PDP favouring this approach argue that when Chief Bola Ige, a powerful politician, was murdered, heavens did not fall, although the former President, is a Yoruba man,” it said.

    “The second option is more crafty. The PDP will seek to resuscitate the case of the murder of Funso Williams, a former Lagos State governorship candidate, by blaming Tinubu for the killing. They are already coaching inmates and others. They are offering them the promise of early release and money, if they will make statements implicating Tinubu in the Williams murder. The Presidency intends to rush through this process with the hope of putting Tinubu out of circulation by trapping him in a contrived criminal process, until the elections are over.”

    Chiding the PDP for desperation, the Tinubu media office said the ruling party resorted to the option of planning to liquidate Tinubu, following the failure of its design to fracture the APC.

    It added: “The PDP and Jonathan Presidency had recently tried to fracture the APC by offering Tinubu the position of the Vice President in an interim government, if he would agree to part company with the popular Buhari.  Once Tinubu rebuffed the offer to participate in the interim scheme, the Presidency decided to change tactics. It would no longer try to entice Tinubu with sugar, but would now move to silence and, if necessary, neutralise him.”

    Noting that the APC National Leader has caused President Jonathan’s team sleepless nights during the electioneering, it said the hostility against him peaked, following his rejection of the offer to participate in the proposed interim government.

    Tinubu, according to the media office, has asserted himself as a legitimate opposition leader through his prolific, robust and strident criticism of government’s socio-economic and security policies.

    It stressed: “They blame him as the man who is most responsible for placing them in their current electoral quandary. They believe without Tinubu’s efforts, the successful merger of the political parties into the APC would not have occurred and they would not be facing possible defeat at the hands of this new party.

    “The PDP faces its stiffest competition ever in 16 years and the person they blame the most is Tinubu, the major actor, who is seen as the strategic mind of the new party and one person who must be stopped at all cost. General Buhari has since been pencilled down for similar character assassination and vicious insults alongside other leaders of the APC.”

    The media office recalled previous plots to dent Tinubu’s image by dredging discredited claims of illicit wealth to silence him.

    It said when the plot to disgrace the former governor at the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) collapsed, the Presidency and the PDP opted for new plots to throw the APC into disarray to brighten its prospects of winning the election.

    The media office said that Tinubu will not take these threats, plots and revelations lightly because of what it described as the government’s capacity for devilish acts.

    At his press conference yesterday,Uwujaren also denied  allegations by the Director, Media and Publicity, of the Muhammadu Buhari Campaign Organization, Mallam Garba Shehu, that the leadership of the EFCC was corrupt and insensitive to the welfare of staff.

    He said there was never any disagreement between the Chairman of EFCC, Mr. Ibrahim Lamorde and the Secretary to the agency, Emmanuel Adegboyega Aremo.

    He said: “The EFCC is alarmed by this claim. The chairman of the Commission is respected in the law enforcement circles for his integrity and professionalism. He values his reputation which he built over the years and, it will be a great disservice to seek to rubbish him on the altar of politics. “There is no evidence of corruption, either in the past or present, against the EFCC chair.”

    Uwujaren said the EFCC staff were not being owed salaries.

    The EFCC last night issued a statement asking the public to ignore what it called  a fake letter from the Chief of Staff to President Goodluck Jonathan in circulation.

    The commission released an authentic letter from the Office of the Chief of Staff to draw attention to the difference    between the  ‘genuine’ letterhead  of the Presidency and the   ‘fake’ one purportedly from Aso Villa.

    The commission’s  spokesman, Mr. Wilson Uwujaren,in a stamen said “The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC wishes to alert the public about a letter supposedly from the office of the Chief of Staff to President Goodluck Jonathan, mandating the commission to initiate discreet investigation against some prominent political figures in the country.

    “The commission urges the public to discountenance the said letter as it is forged document, intended to mislead the people.

    “The features of the letter are markedly different from that on a genuine letter from the office of the Chief of Staff to the president.

    “As evidence that this is a clear forgery, we reproduce below the fake letter alongside a copy of an authentic letter from the same office.”

  • Confusion in Presidency, PDP over Obasanjo

    Confusion in Presidency, PDP over Obasanjo

    * Jonathan woos Kwankwaso, Wammako, Gemade, Goje, others

    The Presidency is in dilemma over how to handle former President Olusegun Obasanjo following calls for his expulsion from the Peoples Democratic Party(PDP) for alleged anti-party activities.

    The PDP is also ruing the defection of five of its governors and other stalwarts to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Some top shots of the ruling party and presidency officials have already launched secret moves to reopen talks with the governors.

    They want them back as part of the last minute strategy to swing the tide of public opinion in favour of President Goodluck Jonathan.

    The initiators of the peace talks, according to sources familiar with the development, are trying to prevail on the affected governors not to make things difficult for the President such that he could win between 25 and 40 per cent votes in their states.

    But the Presidency and the PDP are confused about what to do with ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo following recommendation   by some party bigwigs, including Ijaw leader Chief Edwin Clark that the ex-President should be expelled.

    Some ex-PDP chiefs being wooed  are Governors Rabiu Kwankwaso (Kano);  Aliyu Wammako (Sokoto); Abdulfatai Ahmed (Kwara); ex-Governors Segun Oni, Olagunsoye Oyinlola, Danjuma Goje, Bayo Alao-Akala, Rasheed Ladoja, ex-PDP National chairmen like Audu Ogbeh, Barnabas Gemade, Kawu Baraje, ex-ministers Labaran Maku, Samuel Ortom and others.

    It was gathered that though Governor Sule Lamido has not defected, the presidency and PDP are worried that he is yet to show enough commitment to Jonathan’s re-election bid.

    Investigations revealed that only Governor Rotimi Amaechi is being sidelined in the discreet lobbying because of what a source described as a “South-South” challenge.

    It was learnt that the peace initiative followed moves to prevent any possible run-off poll with the presidential candidate of the APC, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari.

    Some of these defectors are being begged to collapse their structures with PDP to ease victory for Jonathan on February 14.

    A highly-placed PDP source said: “There is no point pretending, we are feeling the impact of those who have defected from our party to the APC.

    “If they had remained in the party, it would have been a walk-over for Jonathan at the polls during the presidential race.

    “We have discovered that our major obstacles are those who have left PDP because they are masters of the game in their own right.

    “This is why some forces in the presidency and the PDP are making last minutes moves to engage them to have a rethink and work for Jonathan wherever they are.

    “We know that after the elections, we will embark on massive reconciliation to bring back everybody under the same umbrella.”

    Another privileged source said: “Emissaries are being sent to some of these defectors in the overall interest of the party.

    “This is the kind of rapprochement that the late Chief K.O. Mbadiwe would describe as ‘Accord Concordiale’. The PDP does not want to lose the poll.

    “The party has the war chest to win the elections but it needs votes to seal its victory at the first ballot.

    “Besides the defectors, the party is worried about the siddon look attitude of leaders like Governor Sule Lamido and others.

    Contacted, the National Publicity Secretary of APC, Chief Olisa Metuh, said: “Officially, I am not aware but I must restate that our doors are open to returning and new members.

    “We know that most of these people who defected from PDP to APC are not happy where they are. They are free to come back.

    “They have left a land flowing with milk and honey for the desert. They have left a party where they were major stakeholders to a party where only one or two people take decisions.”

    As at press time, there was confusion in the presidency and PDP on what to do with ex- President Olusegun Obasanjo whom some party elders had accused of alleged anti-party activities.

    While some elders like Chief Edwin Clark wanted Obasanjo expelled, majority favoured that the ex-President should be ignored.

    A member of the NWC said: “The President has engaged Obasanjo like a father; it is left to him to chart his part.

    “But do not forget that he said he cannot dump a party that made him the President of Nigeria.

    “We are still hopeful that he will temper Justice with mercy. We will reconcile him too with the party.”

    Another NWC member simply quipped: “I don’t discuss personality, I face issues. I cannot talk on ex-President Obasanjo.”

  • Confusion over consensus in Kebbi

    Confusion over consensus in Kebbi

    Kebbi State All Progressive Congress(APC) has resolved to adopt one governorship aspirants from each of the three senatorial districts before electing one candidate, who will be its flag bearer in next year’s elections.

    The Chairman of the Consensus Committee, Alhaji Suleiman Argungu, told reporters  in  Birnin-Kebbi that the party would finally present only one candidate for the election.

    He explained that 10 aspirants, who had indicated interest in the position, are expected to agree on one candidate from their senatorial zone.

    “This would enable the party to avoid distraction and pool resources together to other governorship candidates from other parties,”he said

    Argungu said that Kebbi North Senatorial District has adopted Alhaji Ahmad Sama, adding that the Kebbi South and Central are expected to present their candidates.

    “The All Progressive Congress(APC) would continue to explore avenues to ensure that the party emerge victorious at the governorship election through internal democracy, transparency,”he added.

     

  • Ivory tower of decay, confusion

    Ivory tower of decay, confusion

    •Sorry state of Bayelsa federal polytechnic 

    From a citadel of learning, the Federal Polytechnic, Ekowe, the only polytechnic owned by the Federal Government in Bayelsa, the state of President Goodluck Jonathan, has gradually become the Ivory Towers of decay, corruption and confusion.

    The polytechnic is located on the bank of the River Nun in Southern Ijaw Local Government Area. It has a mandate to produce middle and high level manpower in Aqua Agriculture, Oil and Gas, Applied and Enviromental Science programmes.

    The institution’s journey to destruction started last year during the tenure of its former Rector, Dr. Eneyi Ekpebu. The school then erupted with allegations of financial fraud against Ekpebu and the then bursar, Mr. James Neminebor.

    The school was said to have only admitted 48 students since its establishment in 2009. Despite its lean student population, the school reportedly maintained 100 employees on its payroll.

    It was discovered that the institution might have been crippled by inefficient management and perhaps gross and deliberate financial misappropriation. It was as if some persons vowed to destroy the institution by making it their personal cash cow.

    Irked by the development, the Senior Staff Association of Nigeria Polytechnics (SSANP), engaged Ekpebu, the bursar and other management staff in a protracted labour dispute.

    The union wrote petitions to the then Supervising Minister of Education, Mr. Nyesom Wike, detailing the woes of the institution and calling on him to bring sanity to the polytechnic.

    They complained among other things of infrastructural decay, unpaid arears of salaries, allowances, minimum wage, first 28 days allowance and implementation of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) and pension scheme.

    Maybe, as some persons said, the minister was embroiled in the politics of Rivers State and turned deaf ears to the cries of SSANP. Ekowe continued to burn. The crisis claimed its first casualty, Mr. Frank Moses, a 35-year-old senior administrative employee of the institution.

    Moses was assassinated in his home in Yenagoa. SSANP accused the rector of killing Moses alleging that the deceased became a target for exposing N1bn fraud in the institution and for dragging the rector to court over allegations of embezzlement.

    Petitions were further written to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) by the union. Ekowe suddenly became a campus of reproach as officials of the anti-graft agencies turned their satellite on it.

    In fact, officials of the institution including the former Rector, Dr. Douglas Ekpebu, were summoned by the EFCC. They were invited to appear before the EFCC in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, as part of investigations into alleged financial scam in the polytechnic.

    Ekpebu was requested to come along with the institution’s Bursar, Mr. James Neminebor; Head of Audit, Mr. Denson Ojigbare; Mr. Abadani Woyengikuro; and Mr. Zechariah Owutuamor.

    A letter of invitation dated January 20, 2014, and signed by the EFCC’s Zonal Head, Mr. David Inyang, said the rector and other officials would be interrogated by the Officer in charge of Economic Governance.

    The letter reads: “This office is currently investigating a case involving your school in which the need to obtain certain clarifications from you and some of your officers have become imperative.”

    The letter also requested them to come along with a list of academic and non-academic employees showing their ages, sex, state of origin among other things from 2009 till date.

    The rector and others were also requested to furnish the agency with the list of all contracts awarded and executed by the institution from 2009 to date.

    The contract list, according to the invitation, must show “contract sum, contract type, date of award, status, contractors, locations, award letters and bill of quantities.” Other requirements are “mode of payment, vouchers, cash books, income and expenditure, and cheques from 2009 to date.”

    The investigations continued until Ekpebu proceeded on his terminal leave after the expiration of his tenure.

    The Governing Council, on February 20, appointed Mrs. Emilian Bribena as Acting Rector.  Bribina, before her appointment, was the Librarian.

    Despite the change in the mantle of leadership, the rot in Ekowe has festered. Sadly, the institution has been abandoned and it was allowed to become a thick forest.

    Now, administrative and academic activities are grounded at the school. Vegetation, long shrubs and grass have overgrown many buildings and facilities in the school. Some of the buildings are in disuse and are locked.

    Academic, non-academic, senior and junior members of staff are no longer reporting for duty at the polytechnic.

    “The ugly situation has left the students in a very terrible condition in the campus,” a source, who pleaded for anonymity, said.

    “The school clinic is locked up due to the fact that all the drugs have expired. No lectures are going on, there’s no medicare and what have you,” he added.

    Indeed, indications emerged during the week that Ekowe was going from bad to worse. The acting rector’s desire to bring changes to the university appears to have been frustrated by a cabal. The acting rector was said to have uncovered a grand conspiracy to keep the polytechnic wailing in its knees. She has petitioned the EFCC in respect of the discovery.

    The acting rector in the petition accused the Acting Registrar, Mr. Woyengkuro Abadani; the Bursar, Mr. James Nimenebo, whose tenure was said to have expired; the immediate past Registrar, Mr. Williabo Apelebiri and the Chairman and some members of the Governing Council of conniving to swindle the institution of funds running into hundreds of millions of naira without her knowledge and authority.

    The petition was dated October 23 and titled, “Petition on Gross Mismanagement and Embezzlement of the Funds of Federal Polytechnic Ekowe and addressed to the Zonal Head, EFCC, Port Harcourt, Rivers State.

    She alleged that the bursar cunningly made himself the compulsory signatory to the polytechnic accounts right from the beginning of her appointment in order to perpetuate the embezzlement of the school’s funds.

    She said : “They have made the functioning of the Polytechnic difficult due to the cabal and syndicate this trio – the Chairman of Council, the Bursar and the present falsely appointed Ag. Registrar have formed.

    “Sir, it may interest your Commission to note that  the Chairman of Governing Council never responded to any of the distress calls or letters written for his intervention as Chairman of Council because he is their backbone and the kingpin behind the financial woes of the Federal Polytechnic.

    “The bursar should produce my approvals for every withdrawal he has made so far for salary and overhead accounts and other accounts of the Polytechnic.

    “By Section 9, Sub-section 2 of the Polytechnic Act, Laws of the Federation 1993, ‘the Bursar is responsible to the Office of the Rector for the day-to-day administration and control of the financial affairs of the Polytechnic’.

    “In order to fulfill the tenements of administrative law, I issued the Bursar queries and even reminder without any response. I have also chronicled these developments to different federal quarters without any immediate response.”

    She added that the trio held a kangaroo tender board meeting, awarded contracts to themselves and later tried to force her to sign the document.

    “ I humbly petition that the finances of the Polytechnic be investigated between January 20, 2014 to date. That the Bursar should bring all his financial books and approvals given to every withdrawal and posting/transfer he has made so far.

    “The Bursar has ceased being the Bursar of the Polytechnic as his tenure expired since 27th of September, 2014 without any renewal known to me.

    “By regulation, he was meant to have proceeded three (3) months to this time on terminal leave. I have directed him to handover to the next most senior officer in his department (Mr. Steve Otobo) in writing but he has refused to hand over because he wants to continue in his craft with his cohorts”, she said.

    She prayed the commission to apprehend the suspects and prosecute them for fraudulent conversion of Polytechnic funds and for misrepresenting her as being present in a crucial Tenders Board meeting as the Chairperson of that board to award hundreds of millions to their personal companies whereas she was not present at that purported meeting.

    She insisted that the persons mentioned in the petition should be prosecuted for the forgery of documents relating to the tender meeting; gross misconduct and abuse of their offices as public office holders against anti-graft laws of the country.

    She said: “They should be prosecuted for threat to my person and family by using different pseudo names and fake GSM numbers to send threat messages and threat calls to my family members due to my holding of the truth against them in terms of the financial crimes they commit and keep committing till this moment.

    “And they have gone berserk now because I have written to freeze all the Polytechnic accounts.”

    Following the moves by the rector to sanitise the institution, Niger Delta Report gathered that the the Chairman of the Governing Council was plotting to replace her.

    But the students are appealing to President Goodluck Jonathan, the ministry of education and other responsible agencies to quickly wade into the crisis rocking the institution in the interest of their future.

    They have also suggested radical change in management and maybe compulsory retirement and prosecution of persons accused of stalling institution’s progress. They have also asked the persons mentioned in the petition to explain their roles in the scam.

    When contacted, the bursar, Mr. Mimenabo, asked the Niger Delta Report to direct its enquiries to the Public Relations Officer.

     

  • Confusion in indigenous languages’ adverts

    As the world celebrates International Languages Day, a lead translator at XML Language Services Limited, Olugboyega Adebanjo, examines the use and misuse of indigenous languages in advert copies.

    The bedrock of ads in languages is translation. As the copywriter writes the copy in English, the translator writes the copy in Nigerian languages. Suffice to say: what a copywriter is to the English-Nigerian audience, is what a translator is to the non-English Nigerian audience. For emphasis, what a copywriter is to the English-Nigerian audience, glish Nigerian audience.

    Moreover, a translator “must, therefore, have a mastery of the two languages and of the subject matter of the work, thus expressing his own personality in it. It follows that to translate is to create,” Translation Rights and Translators’ Rights by The World Intellectual Property Organisation et al. It is the expression of “his own personality” that equates him with a copywriter.

    And the icing on the cake, as postulated by Tsehai Wada of the Addis Ababa University (AAU), is: “Translators as mediators between cultures have much responsibilities than authors (copywriters) (bracket added).” It is the dearth of this understanding that ruins ads in Nigerian languages. Such ruins are the translations of ‘SIM’ as ‘phone’, ‘registration of SIM’ as ‘registration of name’, ‘scratch’ as ‘peel’ etc. by the telecom operators.

    Another of such ruin is the translation of a popular brand of phone slogan – Be Original, Buy Original. A Yoruba radio ad of the phone simply translates and renders the slogan as an-an la n rin, Ra Ojulowo. The first thing to note is the inconsistency in the translation of the word ‘original’ as an-an la n rin and Ojulowo. While Ojulowo is apt translation of the word ‘original’, an-an la n rin is ‘to walk in a straight direction’. In context, the translation reads ‘Walk in a Straight Direction, Buy Original’.

    Absolutely, no correlation, and it is sheer confusion – no clarity. Besides, would J Ojulowo be apt translation of Be Original? But that would be the Yoruba of a non-Yoruba stock. Be Original is best translated as Fran Nnkan Ojulowo which means ‘to like something original’. If you like something original, then you can be said to Be Original. Absurdity of this nature is bounteous in ads in Nigerian languages. The absurdity is in sync with Fred Allen’s (a late American humourist) witticism that “An advertising agency is 85 per cent confusion and 15 per cent commission.” Indeed, the agencies (in connivance with the advertisers) sell 85 per cent confusion to us in order to line their pockets with 15 per cent commission.

     

    Why the confusion?

    Deliberate evasion of translation process by advertisers and advertising agencies. Proof reading – a second person and independent perspective to translation – completes the cycle of the process. The process would remain detracted, just as it is today, if the services of mavens are not employed. A voice over artist, a radio or TV presenter, or a Yoruba, Igbo or Hausa orator is not a translator.

    A translator is first a linguist, and native speaker of a language. It is only a linguist who has the knowledge and depth on the grammar and stylistic usage of a language. Native speaker? Yes! A Yoruba or Edo man who speaks Hausa is inapt to do Hausa voice over. If anything, his pronunciations will betray him. Could the N20,000 (or less in some cases) being paid as the price of translation of a script in the advertising sector be justifiable? Based on my earlier assertion, if translation is seen as a copy in another language, and that is what it is, the question is: Would N20,000 be paid for a copy of any sort in English?

    The price defies economic logic in relation to the Advertising Standard Panel’s vetting approval of a script at N20,000 – the least. Come to think of it, you never know when you will be paid the money (for translation). Based on comments from at least two different A-rating agencies, it takes between three months and one year. The disinclination of the Nigerian state to regulate and protect this form of art remains a concern.

     

    Who is vetting what?

    I really find it difficult to believe that Advertising Standards Panel (ASP) – Advertising Practitioners Council of Nigeria (APCON) statutory committee – empower to vet ads do vet ads in Nigerian languages. If it does, one thing is clear: the linguistic incompetence of its members in Nigerian languages. Page 3 of the Vetting Guideline says, “The Vetting Guidelines apply to the entire contents of an advertisement, including words….” There is an urgent need for ASP to employ the service of experienced linguists and translators to help them take ‘care of words’ in Nigerian languages.

     

  • Confusion in Adamawa: Ex- Deputy Governor denies resignation

    There was a twist to the Adamawa State  crisis yesterday following denial of resignation by ex-Deputy Governor Bala Ngilari.

    Ngilari claimed that he was forced to send a letter to the ex- Speaker of the House of Assembly, Umaru Fintiri, who is now the acting Governor.

    There were indications last night that some forces in Abuja and Adamawa  State were pushing for the inauguration of Ngilari as the Acting Governor instead of Fintiri, who was sworn in on Tuesday.

    The sacked Governor Murtala Nyako last night said Ngilari had not resigned and should be made acting Governor.

    Ngliari reportedly opened up on how  the deputy speaker now the acting Speaker,  Kwamoti Laori invaded his official residence with a group of soldiers and ordered him to tender his resignation letter as “directed  from above.”

    The embattled Deputy Governor was quoted as saying: “The truth is that I have not sent any letter of resignation to the governor up till now because the representative of the House of Assembly  only came to my house yesterday asking me to tender my resignation and he asked me to address the letter to the speaker of the Assembly which I did.

    “When  the lawmakers led by the deputy speaker met and asked me to write the resignation, I wrote it to the governor but later on they came and said that I should change it and addressed it to the speaker.

    The sacked  Governor of Adamawa State, Murtala Nyako, demanded the reinstatement of his deputy as the authentic acting governor of the state.

    Nyako made the demand in a statement in Yola through his Director of Press and Public Affairs, Ahmad Sajoh

    The statement said: “Our attention has been drawn to the purported resignation of the deputy governor of Adamawa state, Barrister Bala James Ngillari which was supposedly read on the floor of the State House of Assembly.

    “We wish to state categorically that Section 306 (5) of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended requires that the deputy resigned not to the House of Assembly but tothe Governor. As at the time the supposed resignation was said to have been tendered in the House, Murtala H Nyako was the governor of Adamawa state.

    “No such was written to him, none was received by him and none was approved by him. It should therefore be known that in the eyes of the law, the deputy governor has not resigned. Barrister Bala James Ngillari is still the Deputy Governor of Adamawa State.

    “This clarification is necessary to avert another subversion of the constitution, since the order processes relating to the impeachment saga have all been in contravention of the constitution and the law.We wish to observe that the continued abuse of the constitution and the law of the land will spell doom for our democracy.”

     

  • Questionable confusion

    Questionable confusion

    •The court must find out the source of misrepresentation of its order on Diezani’s suit

    THE orchestrated confusion over the actual order made by the Federal High Court, in the suit brought by the Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Alison-Madueke, to frustrate the summons extended to her by the House of Representatives, over the alleged N10 billion bill on jets, is embarrassing. So, we share in Justice Ahmed Mohammed’s angst that a simple ruling of the court that the defendant, the House of Representatives, should be put on notice, has been misrepresented by the House spokesman, Zakari Mohammed, to mean a restraining order against the House in the performance of its constitutional responsibility. That is scandalous, and there is need to find out who engineered this misinformation.

    Rightly, the court has summoned the House to explain the source of this misinformation, as counsel to the minister and the House have both denied knowledge of such an order by the court. But even more importantly, the court must ask itself: what is the substance of the suit brought by the minister to it? If as we suspect, the minister is on mere frolic, to frustrate a clear constitutional prerogative of the House of Representatives to investigate and expose corruption, inefficiency and waste in the administration of laws within its legislative competence, the court has no business allowing such a frivolous suit on its cause list.

    Even as the confusion lingered, it is reassuring that the Speaker, Alhaji Aminu Tambuwal, has assured Nigerians that the probe on the incredulous sums allegedly expended by the minister on chartering private jets for her trips, has not ended. Indeed, it must not. For, how can the House of Representatives which is clearly mandated by the provisions of sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 constitution to conduct such a probe it has told Nigerians it shall do, over the Alison-Madueke’s saga, turn around to do otherwise? The claim by the House, that a court has issued an order, which the court has openly denied, puts the integrity of the House in question over its determination to conduct the investigation.

    It is bad enough that such humongous sum has been allegedly wasted by the minister and her cohorts. But it will be heart-rending were a constitutional watchdog, like the House of Representatives, give itself out as either not giving a damn about such serious allegations of corruption, or of having been compromised by that rapacious agency of government.

    The House and indeed Nigerians are not unaware of the grave opacity pervading the Ministry of Petroleum Resources, neither are they unaware of the great length the ministry is reputed to usually go, to ensure that its activities are never opened for scrutiny. It is public knowledge that efforts in the past to bring the ministry to be publicly accountable never succeeded, and unless the House moves swiftly, the general impression will be that this probe has suffered a similar fate.

    While we acknowledge the rights of individuals to approach the court to ventilate their claims, we are surprised at the minister’s resort to court in this instance. After all, unless she has something to hide, the issue at stake was ordinarily the propriety of the costs she incurred as a public official, which should be in the public domain. Notably, the House is not in a position to convict, merely to expose corruption and make necessary laws to correct any defect. So, what is the haste by the minister, to stop a mere investigation for? On our part, we urge the court to quickly dispense with the matter, in the overriding interest of public policy.

  • Confusion in PDP over Oyinlola’s fate

    Confusion in PDP over Oyinlola’s fate

    Barely five months after the reinstatement of its sacked National Secretary, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, there is still confusion in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) on the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

    President Goodluck Jonathan and the National Chairman of the party, Alhaji Adamu Muazu, are said to be in favour of the party obeying the court order.

    But some leaders of the party and the Ogun State Executive Committee of PDP are opposed to it.

    The dilemma forced the PDP National Chairman to meet with Oyinlola behind closed doors last Thursday.

    It was, however, gathered that the leadership of the party sees the solution in prevailing on the Ogun State Executive Committee of PDP to withdraw its pending appeal at the Supreme Court to address the Oyinlola challenge facing the party.

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja in November, last year, reinstated Oyinlola as the National Secretary of the PDP.

    The three-man panel, chaired by Justice Amiru Sanusi, upturned the January 11 judgment of Justice Abdul Kafarati of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which sacked Oyinlola.

    Justice Kafarati said Oyinlola’s nomination and election as the National Secretary were invalid.

    Sources told The Nation that attempts by the party to comply with the judgment of the Court of Appeal were resisted by former National Chairman Bamanga Tukur who wanted the case to run its full course.

    There are fears that the stalemate might affect the party’s preparations for the 2015 poll if it is not addressed.

    It was learnt that if the Supreme Court does not consider the appeal of some leaders of Ogun State Executive Committee of PDP, the party might run into trouble as all actions taken by the incumbent National Secretary, Prof. Wale Oladipo, would be illegal.

    Some of the critical issues, which may be affected, are:

    •All decisions taken by the National Executive Committee (NEC) and the National Working Committee (NWC) since Oyinlola was removed from office;

    •Emergence of Muazu at a NEC meeting might be invalid because Oladipo summoned the meeting. Unless a mini-national conference is held to rectify the constitutional breach, Muazu may be a victim of this power play;

    •Nomination forms of all PDP candidates for 2014 and 2015 elections signed by the incumbent National Secretary would be invalid since he is no longer the substantive occupant of the office; and

    •PDP may be seen as disrespectful of the Judiciary.

    A top source said: “We are worried about the overall implications of not respecting the judgment of the Court of Appeal because anything done by the present National Secretary is so far illegal.

    “There is confusion on Oyinlola’s fate. Some leaders have alleged that since he was one of those who formed the short-lived New PDP, we should not reinstate him.

    “The fact is that some of those who formed the nPDP, including governors, have returned to the party. A court had also declared the nPDP as illegal because there was no crisis in PDP to warrant such factionlisation.

    “Our concern is about the importance of the National Secretary to our preparations for 2015. We cannot build something on nothing. This is why we are pleading with our leaders to allow wise counsel to guide our decision.

    “Some of our leaders are saying that we should rectify any constitutional lapse on Muazu’s emergence at a mini-National Convention in May. The biggest problem is the Office of the National Secretary. Legally, Oyinlola is the National Secretary but in terms of political expediency, it is Prof. Oladipo.”

    A source in the NWC said: “The last time we discussed Oyinlola’s matter was during the tenure of Bamanga Tukur. We could not go far because he had a particular disposition to it.

    “The new PDP National Chairman is addressing this challenge, but he has not tabled it before the NWC.

    “I knew Oyinlola was around last Thursday and Muazu had some discussions with the reinstated National Secretary.

    “Everyone in the NWC is hoping that Muazu would find a solution to this issue.”

    Another source in the party said: “From the look of things, President Goodluck Jonathan and Muazu are disposed to deference to the order of the Court of Appeal to reinstate Oyinlola.

    “The party leadership is only trying to manage the situation on how to prevail on PDP leaders from Ogun State, who went to the Supreme Court, to withdraw their case.

    “As it is now, Oyinlola has no case before the apex court, it is those PDP leaders who should be magnanimous to put the past behind them since the Court of Appeal had given a verdict.”