Tag: Constitution amendment

  • Senate dumps devolution of powers to states

    Senate dumps devolution of powers to states

    Four key constitution amendment proposals were rejected by the Senate on Thursday.

    The four rejected critical proposals included the devolution of powers to states, deletion of the Land Use Act from the Constitution, state creation and boundary and 35 per cent affirmative action for women.

    Also rejected was the recommendation to alter section 25 of the constitution to guarantee a married woman’s right to choose either her indigeneship by birth or by marriage for the purpose of appointment or election.

    A total of 97 senators were in the chamber for the historic vote.

    In all there, Constitution review committee formulated 33 bills, 29 passed, while four others failed.

    At least two-third of the 109 senators were required to pass any of the 33 bills except the bill on procedure for overriding the presidential veto in Constitution Alteration which requires 4/5 of the 109 senators present and voting.

    On devolution of powers to states, the review panel said that (Devolution of Powers) –“This seeks to alter the Second Schedule, Part I & II to move certain items to the Concurrent Legislative List to give more legislative powers to states. It also delineates the extent to which the federal legislature and state assemblies can legislate on the items that have been moved to the Concurrent Legislative List.”

    A total of 95 senators voted. While 56 voted yes, 48 voted nay and one abstained. The proposal failed to meet 2/3 required for it to pass through the process.

    On removal of the Land Use Act from the constitution, the committee said “Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, (Fourth Alteration) Bill, No. 32, 2017 (Deletion of the Land Use Act from the Constitution) – The Bill seeks to alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 to delete the Land Use Act from the Constitution so that it can be subject to the regular process of amendment.”

    A total of 90 senators voted. While 46 senators voted yes, 44 others voted against the bill, thus rendering the proposal unacceptable.

    On state creation and boundary adjustment, the review panel proposed, “(State Creation and boundary Adjustment) – This essentially seeks to alter section 8 of the Constitution to ensure that only democratically elected local government councils participate in the process of state creation and boundary adjustment.  It also removed ambiguities in the extant provisions to enhance clarity with respect to the procedure for state creation.”

    A total of 90 senators voted on the proposal. While 42 senators voted yes, 48 others voted against it. It failed to meet the required 2/3 votes required for it to pass through the process.

  • Constitution amendment: Reps fix minimum age for presidential aspirants at 35

    Constitution amendment: Reps fix minimum age for presidential aspirants at 35

    • No second term for VP, D-Gov who succeed dead incumbent
    • Road cleared for independent candidates
    • Local governments to get financial autonomy
    • 35 percent appointments reserved for women

    Future presidential elections in the country may be thrown open to interested Nigerians from the age of 35 and above, if constitution amendment proposals now before the House of Representatives are adopted.

    The current minimum age for qualification for the office is 40.

    Besides, Nigerians from the age of 25 years may also be allowed to seek election into the state assemblies and the House of Representatives, down from the present 30 years.

    These are some of the highlights of the report of the fourth alteration of the 1999 Constitution laid before the House by the Lasun Yusuf- headed Constitution Review Committee last Thursday.

    The report is scheduled to be  considered and adopted through electronic voting on  Tuesday and Wednesday after which  the House will proceed  on its annual recess.

    The age qualification provision comes under a bill entitled “An Act to alter the provisions of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,1999 to reduce the age for qualification for the offices of the President and Governor and membership of the Senate, House of Representatives and the State Houses of Assembly, and for other related matters.”

    It is the brainchild of a coalition of 53 Civil Society Groups which presented it to the House as the “Not too young to run bill.”

    The report seeks to bar any person who was sworn in as President or Governor to complete the term of the elected President or Governor from being elected to the same office for more than a single term.

    It stipulates that the President must, within 30 days of taking the oath of office, swear in his ministers and in the case of governors, their commissioners.

    This, apparently, is to discourage a situation where cabinets are not formed for months.

    In addition, the president in sending his list of ministers to the Senate for confirmation, indicate the portfolio of each nominee.

    It requires the President to deliver the State of the Nation address before a joint session of the National Assembly on the first legislative day in the month of May every year

    The report recommends that 35 percent of persons appointed as Ministers or commissioners shall be women while there is also provision for independent candidates.

    In a move to stop legal disputes arising from elections to drag on for too long, every pre-election matter shall be filed in court not later than 14 days from the date of occurrence of event, decision or action complained of in the suit.

    A new subsection 12 proposes that an appeal from a decision of the court on pre-election matter shall be heard and disposed of within 60 days from the date of filing the appeal.

    The Council of State is proposed for expansion to include all former Senate Presidents and Speakers of the House of Representatives that were not removed through impeachment. This is to ensure fair representation by the three arms of government.

    Section 82 of the report stipulates that the President “may authorize the withdrawal of money in the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federation for the purpose of meeting expenditure necessary to carry on business software government for a period not exceeding three months or until the coming into operation of the Appropriation Act, whichever is the earlier.”

    The intention is to encourage early presentation and passage of Appropriation Bills.

    Section 150 seeks to separate the office of the Attorney General of the Federation from the office of the Minister of Justice.

    The report makes no provision for the Joint State/Local government account as it currently obtains.

    Thus, revenue allocation from the federal purse goes directly to each local government.

    A new section specifically says no unelected person will be recognised by any authority and shall not be entitled to any revenue allocation from the Federation Account or the State government nor exercise any function exercisable by a local government council under the constitution.

    Election into the local governments is for a three year-tenure expiration period for elected persons to the Council

    Certain items were moved from Exclusive List to Concurrent List in the Second Schedule.

    These include national parks, pensions, gratuities and other – like benefits payable out of Consolidated Revenue Fund, post, telegraph and telephones, and stamp duties.

    The federal government is to retain exclusive rights to environmental issues relating to, arising from, partaking to and connected with oil and gas exploration, mining activities and other forms of energy exploitation, extraction, transportation and processing.

    The federal government is also to have exclusive legislative rights to environmental issues relating to coastal management and Exclusive Economic zone.

    It also retains rights to Railway, inter-state railway regulations while State Assembly may make laws for the establishment of State railway transportation.

    On electricity, the report proposes in the Second schedule 14 (b) that State Assembly may make laws for the State with respect to “the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity within that State or in collaboration with any other State.”

    These are also provisions for financial autonomy for State legislature and  immunity for lawmakers from civil or criminal proceedings “in respect of words spoken or written before the House or a Committee thereof.”

    It requires the President to deliver the State of the Nation address before a joint session of the National Assembly on the first legislative day in the month of May every year

  • ‘Councils’, state legislatures’ autonomy top constitution amendment list’

    Deputy Senate President Senator Ike Ekweremadu said yesterday that financial autonomy for the state legislatures  and local governments are part of the key issues being considered in the constitution amendment exercise.

    He described financial autonomy as “the single most important constitutional empowerment required by state Houses of Assembly for effective leadership in the interest of democracy and development”.

    A statement by his media aide, Uche Anichukwu said Ekweremadu spoke at the consultative forum for building consensus among stakeholders on local government autonomy organised by the Partnership to Engage and Learn (PERL) in Abuja yesterday.

    It came on a day the Vice Chairman of the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria and Speaker of the Enugu State House of Assembly, Uchenna Ubosi, said that the Conference of Speakers had resolved to support the autonomy for local governments and state assemblies.

    It said Ekweremadu, who spoke on the topic: “Providing effective leadership for the state Houses of Assembly: Leveraging the ongoing constitution review exercise,” emphasised that the autonomy of the local governments was tied to the independent of the state assemblies and understanding of the governors.

    Anichukwu quoted Ekweremadu to have said: “Section 7 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) empowers the states, through their Houses of Assembly, to make laws establishing Local Government Councils, their structure, composition, finance, and functions. Therefore, the independence and efficiency of the leadership of state assemblies are key to the just and efficient exercise of these functions”.

    It said the Deputy Senate President, however, regretted that undue executive and political party interferences in some states bring debilitating influences to bear on the leadership recruitment process of the legislature.

    “The issue of presiding officers must be settled by the parliamentarians themselves in accordance with Section 92 (1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which provides that ‘There shall be a Speaker and a Deputy Speaker of a House of Assembly who shall be elected by members of the House from among themselves’,” Ekweremadu said.

    He said imposition of leadership on any State Assembly would render it “ineffectual, pliable, and sometimes, a lame duck that is ever willing to do the master’s biddings”.

    He cited the example of the 2010 Constitution amendment exercise when the state Houses of Assembly “refused to approve financial autonomy for themselves even when they voted in support of financial independence for the National Assembly.

    Ekweremadu, who chairs the Senate Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution, said: “The result is that while the National Assembly is no longer at the mercy of the Executive arm for its funding, the state assemblies could be easily arm-twisted by starving them of funds, if they refuse to do the biddings of the Executive”.

    On local government autonomy, he stated: “We are making efforts in the ongoing Constitution review exercise to strengthen governance at the grassroots by amending Section 7 of the Constitution to properly situate the local governments as a third tier of the government of the Federation.

    “We are working to make elaborate provisions for their funding, tenure, election, and to clearly delineate their powers and responsibilities. For instance, we seek to abolish the Joint State-Local Government Account in line with popular demand by Nigerians”.

    Ubosi assured the National Assembly that the conference had resolved to support the local councils’ autonomy and financial independence of state assemblies to make them more effective.

     

  • ‘No constitution amendment at RCCG’

    ‘No constitution amendment at RCCG’

    The Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) is not amending its constitution to reflect any leadership changes, the church stated yesterday.

    RCCG Head of Media and Public Relations, Pastor Segun Adegbiji, made the clarification following a report on Friday which suggested that there was an ongoing constitution amendment from its governing council.

    He said: “Yes, we do have a constitution. The governing council has the liberty and power to amend it if it so wishes. But I didn’t say they were amending it. We are not amending the constitution on structure.”

    On Thursday, the church dismissed insinuations that RCCG General Overseer, Pastor Enoch Adeboye, had resigned as the General Overseer of the RCCG, following his appointment, last Saturday, of Pastor Joseph Obayemi as National Overseer of RCCG Nigeria.

    Adegbiji explained that Adeboye, fondly called ‘Daddy G.O.’, remains the head of the RCCG, and Obayemi, like other National or Country Overseers around the world, reports to the G.O.

    He said: “Daddy G.O. does not make such an important decision without consulting the Church Council, and most importantly, God. That decision has been made and it does not in any way affect his position as the General Overseer of the RCCG.”

    The PRO said the appointment became necessary partly because of the RCCG’s rapid growth and expansion, adding that the plan for a national or country overseer for RCCG Nigeria began before the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) implemented its now suspended Corporate Governance Code.

    FRC Executive Secretary, Mr. Jim Obazee, a former RCCG pastor, was removed by the government on Monday.

    Adegbiji also stated that the RCCG Governing Council still had Adeboye as leader, and Obayemi and six other Assistant General Overseers and two special assistants as members.

  • Senate and constitution amendment: Matters arising

    Senate and constitution amendment: Matters arising

    Assistant Editor, Onyedi Ojiabor, reports on the submissions the Senate Committee on Review of the 1999 Constitution made during the week

    Activities marking further alteration of the 1999 Constitution heightened during the week following the submission of the highlights of areas covered in the ongoing constitution amendment efforts.

    Senators who claimed not to know that the consideration of the areas of the constitution mapped out for amendment has reached advanced stage were jolted into action.

    Deputy Senate President and Chairman, Senate Committee on Review of the 1999 Constitution, Senator Ike Ekweremadu, who made the submission, gave explanation on the status of the constitution amendment.

    The submissions, explanations, and the areas covered in the proposed amendment were revealing.

    The proposed creation of a mayoral seat for the Federal Capital Territory, (FCT) Abuja, although long overdue, may turn out one of the thorny and prickly areas of the amendment.

    Financial autonomy for State Houses of Assembly, which was earlier turned down by the same State Assemblies the National Assembly attempted to rescue from the stranglehold of state governors, may sail through this time around.

     The proposed abolition of State-Local Government Joint Account is likely to be stoutly opposed by governors who see allocation to local government as free money to play with.

    The areas covered included local government administration, distributable pool account, authorization of expenditure, political parties and electoral matters, and financial autonomy of state legislatures.

    Status of the Federal Capital Territory, nomination of ministers and commissioners, the legislature, and judiciary, devolution of powers and local government change of name were other areas also covered in the proposed amendment.

    The Senate Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution was constituted on 22nd December, 2015 and inaugurated on 13th January, 2016 with a clear mandate to reprocess the aspects of the fourth alteration bill that had gained national consensus and enjoyed huge good-will from the general public, states, Non-Governmental Organisations and international development organisations.

    Ekweremadu told the Senate that between the period of the committee’s inauguration and 8th December 2016, over 15 constitution amendment bills were referred to the committee.

    Some of the bills, he said, dealt with issues already covered by the fourth alteration bill, while a few others dealt on governance issues that have agitated the minds of Nigerians, were considered by the committee.

    To streamline the work of the committee, Ekweremadu said they disaggregated amendments proposals and clustered them into bills according to their thematic classifications.

    On local government administration, Ekweremadu said Section 7 of the Constitution was amended here.

    The amendments in the section, he said, were essentially meant to strengthen local government administration in Nigeria by elaborately providing -a uniform 3-year tenure for elected local government council officials; that local governments without a democratically elected council shall not be entitled to any revenue from the Federation Account.

    Ekweremadu said the amendments, amongst others, were believed will ensure effective service delivery and insulate local governments from undue and counter-productive interferences from state governments.

    On distributable pool account, Ekweremadu said Section 162 of the Constitution was amended to  Provide for national savings of 50 percent of oil revenues above the bench mark for a particular year and 10 percent of any non- oil revenue paid into the Federation Account. Or such other percentage not less than that provided in this section as the National Assembly may determine in the Appropriation Act of a particular year. Provide that any such savings as stipulated in this section will be distributed in accordance with the prevailing revenue sharing formula and in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution provided that the savings shall not be distributed in any period less than ten years from the date of a particular savings.   Abrogate the State Joint Local Government Account and paying monies due to local government councils directly into their respective accounts. Define the fund of the state government; that is, internally generated revenue from which a portion shall be paid into the Local Government Allocation Account.

    On authorisation of expenditure, he said that Sections 82 and 122 of the Constitution were amended to reduce the period within which the president or a governor may authorize the withdrawal of monies from the Consolidated Revenue Fund in the absence of an appropriation act from six months to three months. Ekweremadu explained that essentially, the amendment will compel early presentation of budget proposal by the executive arm of government thereby giving the legislature sufficient time to scrutinize such proposal.

    On political parties and electoral matters, Ekweremadu said Sections 134 (4) & (5), 179 (4) & (5) and 225 were amended to – extend the time for conducting presidential and governorship re-run elections where no clear winner emerged from seven to 21 days to give INEC sufficient time to plan, considering the logistics that is required such as printing and transporting new ballot papers for the elections. Empower the INEC to de-register political parties for non-fulfillment of certain conditions such as breach of registration requirements and failure to secure/win presidential, governorship, local government chairmanship or a seat in the national or State Assembly elections.

    On financial autonomy of state legislatures, he said Section 121 of the Constitution was amended to guarantee a first line charge funding of State Houses of Assembly from the consolidated revenue fund of the state. The same alteration was made during the Third Alteration but was controversially rejected by State Assemblies.

    On status of the Federal Capital Territory, Ekweremadu said under this head, Sections 256, 299, 300, 301 and 302 of the Constitution were amended to create the office of an elected Mayor for the FCT with powers to administer the FCT as if it were a state of the federation by exercising all functions presently administered by the Minister of the FCT. FCT indigenes have been agitating for the creation of a mayoral seat to be created for the FCT. The Federal Government opposed the creation of mayoral seat for the FCT.

    On nomination of ministers and commissioners, Ekweremadu said Sections 147 and 192 of the Constitution were amended to Ensure that the president and governors designate and assign portfolios to persons nominated as ministers or commissioners respectively prior to confirmation by the Senate or State House of Assembly; Provide a period of 60 days within which such nominations shall be forwarded to the Senate or State House of Assembly following inauguration; and provide 35% representation for women in the appointment of ministers and commissioners.

    On the legislature, he said Sections 51, 67, 93 and 315 were amended to  Create the National Assembly Service Commission and the State House of Assembly Service Commission and empower the National Assembly and State House of Assembly respectively to provide for the powers and structure of the commissions through subsequent legislations, and make it mandatory for the president to attend a joint meeting of the National Assembly once a year to deliver a State of the Nation Address. Remove the law-making power of the executive arm of government under S. 315.  The extant provision is starkly contrary to Section 4 of the Constitution which confers law-making powers exclusively on the legislature.

     On the Judiciary, Ekweremadu said Sections 233, 237, 247, 251 and Part I of the Third Schedule of the Constitution were amended to- Provide for all appeals from the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court to be by leave of the Supreme Court except in the case of Interpretation of the Constitution, death sentences and fundamental human rights. Allow two justices of the Court of Appeal sitting in chambers to dispose any application for leave to appeal after considering the records of proceedings if the justices believe the interest of justice does not require an oral hearing of the application. Establish a criminal division of the Federal High Court to try electoral offences, terrorism cases, economic and financial crimes cases. Provide for appeals from the decisions of the National Industrial Court to the Court of Appeal. Provide for 12 Justices of the Court of Appeal to be learned in Labour and Employment Matters for the purpose of hearing appeals from the National Industrial Court. Improve the quality of representation in the National Judicial Council. Put the Code of Conduct Tribunal under the control of the judiciary instead of the executive.

    On devolution of powers, Ekweremadu said Second Schedule, Part I and II of the Constitution were altered to decongest the Exclusive Legislative List to give more powers to states.

    He explained that alteration will enhance the principle of federalism and good governance.

    The amendment specifically substituted “Post and Telegraphs” with “Post and Telecommunications”, and moved Pensions, Prisons, Railways, Stamp Duties and Wages from the Exclusive Legislative List to the Concurrent List and added Arbitration, Environment, Healthcare, Housing, Road Safety, Pensions, Land and Agriculture, Youths, Public Complaints to the Concurrent List.

    On local government change of name, he said the First Schedule was further amended to change the names of local governments as follows:  “Afikpo North” and “Afikpo South” to “Afikpo” and “Edda” respectively; “Egbado North” and “Egbado South” to “ Yewa North” and “Yewa South”;  “Obia/Akpor” to “Obio/Akpor.”

     Ekweremadu explained that in line with the committee’s decision to disaggregate constitutional amendment proposals into different bills, they consolidated and clustered amendment proposals into appropriate thematic and sectional heads.

    He further explained that while some amendment proposals were incorporated into existing Senate Bills, others were grouped thematically.

    He posited that additionally, some amendments that could not fit into any of the above classifications were produced as stand-alone bills.

    Those stand-alone bills, he said, contain amendment proposals which we deem contentious, hence the need to isolate them from other proposals.

     “These clusters are given different short titles such as Fourth Alteration Bill No.1, 2, 3, etcetera.  The reason for this is to ensure that the rejection of a group of sections dealing with an issue does not affect other clusters dealing with different unconnected issues.

    “This is to forestall the unsavory experience of the Fourth Alteration Bill as passed in the 7th Assembly, which after satisfying the provisions of section 9 of the 1999 Constitution as amended was not assented to by the then President,” he said.

    Ekweremadu sought the indulgence of this Senate for more time to harmonize with the House of Representatives and present a unified report for ease of consideration.

     No doubt, the submission of the category of the amendments will go a long way to ginger more Nigerians to take more active part in the amendment process.

    Issues covered in the amendment are matters of interest that are bound to attract due attention to make the alteration of sections of the Constitution worth the while.

    After the Senate and House of Representatives conference session to harmonise areas of disagreement, the battle ground will shift to State Houses of Assembly.

    For any proposed amendment to succeed, at least 24 states of the federation must endorse it.

  • Constitution amendment: Life pension for presiding officers divides Senators

    Constitution amendment: Life pension for presiding officers divides Senators

    •Lawmakers seek abolition of joint Local Government Account

    Senators are sharply divided over a proposal for a life pension for presiding officers of the National Assembly and their counterparts in  the State Houses of Assembly.

    The proposal seeks to create a life pension for the Senate President, Deputy Senate President, Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, and Speakers and Deputy Speakers of state assemblies after vacating office.

    The disagreement was one of the highlights at a two-day Senate retreat on the amendment of the 1999 Constitution concluded yesterday in Lagos.

    Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu who is also chairman, Senate Committee on Constitution review, had made a case for the establishment of life pensions for the principal officers of the two chambers of the National Assembly after their tenure in office.

    The proposal which had been  adopted during the aborted fourth alteration of the constitution generated instant mixed reactions from the lawmakers.

    A good numbers of the Senators kicked against the proposal while some others who supported it said it should be limited to only presiding officers of the National Assembly and their counterparts at the State Houses of Assembly.

    Ekweremadu said: “This has nothing to do with an individual. It is about the institution. Let us not politicize it. Nobody elected the Chief Justice of Nigeria, but he enjoys pension. But if we cheapen our own institution, so be it. Let us not make this a personal thing.”

    Senator Eyinnaya Abaribe in his contribution opposed the proposal.

    The Abia South lawmaker said: “If there must be pension for principal officers, it should cut across. We were all elected from our various constituencies. I think we should not milk the nation dry. We should put selfish interest aside and put that of the nation first.”

    The Senator representing Lagos Central, Senator Oluremi Tinubu also spoke against the proposal.

    She said, “I think principal officers have had enough. I know some Senators that have served and they sometimes come back to ask us for help. Principal officers drive a fleet of cars and they have other entitlements. They should not earn extra money when they leave office.

    “In the last Assembly, we in the minority tried to raise our voice against it. You are first, second and third among equals. Some of us do not even have cars, but principal officers have so many. I think we should drop that idea.”

    But Senator Stella Oduah (Anambra North) threw her weight behind the proposal.

    She said: “Those in the Executive enjoy life pension. Let us stand by our leaders. They should enjoy these benefits. They act on behalf of us. They are equal to the executive and the judiciary and should therefore enjoy the same benefits.”

    Former governor of Zamfara State Senator Ahmed Yerima Sani also supported the proposal.

    He said: “After being elected by all the lawmakers and their constituencies, they should enjoy pensions. Governors who spend just four years in office enjoy it. Principal officers should enjoy it too.”

    Senate Leader, Senator Mohammed Ali Ndume opposed the proposal.

    Ndume said: “The case of the state governors and their deputies is different. They were elected by the public. But we elected our principal officers. To me, I believe that the benefits of the office of the Senate president and other principal officers are too much. They are just first among equals

    “I am against any excessive privileges given to the Senate president or the Speaker. All of us were elected. If we are doing anything, it should be for all members of the National Assembly.”

    The Senator representing Kebbi South, Senator Bala Na’Allah spoke in favour, saying: “Nigeria operates three arms of government. They are supposed to be independent. The Chief Justice of Nigeria takes pension and gratuity when he retires. He gets a house too. This is a serious matter. All Justices of the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court get gratuity.

    “Are you saying we should exclude ourselves as an arm of the government? They are institutions created by the government. The Senate president and other presiding officers should benefit.”

    When Ekweremadu put it to a voice vote those who supported the proposal carried the day.

    After counting the votes, 22 voted in support while 13 voted against the proposal.

    Some others abstained.

    Senator Godswill Akpabio who was apparently displeased with the outcome of the voting said: “If you ask me to vote to have life pension for principal officers, I will say yes. The counting you are doing is not right. The governor of a state and the president cannot stay in office for more than two terms. But for a Senator, he can stay in office for 35 years.”

    Akpabio who gave the example of a former Senate President, David Mark asked, “Are we saying that he will receive life pension while serving as a senator now that he is no longer a presiding officer?”

    Although the proposal was adopted, it still has to be ratified or thrown out by the Senate in plenary where the report of the retreat will be debated.

    Also at the retreat, the Senator voted to abolish the operation of Joint state and local government account.

    Some Senators believed that state governors are using the joint account to impoverish the local governments in their states.

    They insisted that the local governments should receive the funds directly from the federation account.

    A senator who is a former governor said that paying money directly to the local government chairmen meant creating more governors in a state.

    A total of 24 Senators voted to abolish the joint account while eight others voted in support of its retention.

    Most former governors in the Senate voted in support of retention of the joint account

    The proposal will also be ratified or thrown out by the Senate in plenary.

    The Senators also voted overwhelmingly against independent candidacy.

    Their reason was that the country cannot manage it.

  • Reps may reduce age for eligibility into elective offices – Dogara

    Reps may reduce age for eligibility into elective offices – Dogara

    The reduction of age for eligibility into elective offices will be considered in the next constitution amendment to allow youths to participate fully  in the political process., the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon Yakubu Dogara has said.

    Dogara who made the disclosure while Speaking with students from various universities across the country at the National Assembly, also charged youths to participate more actively in politics by breaking voters’ apathy, and electing leaders who will secure their future and interests.

    His words: “I am acutely aware that young people often find themselves on the fringes of the political process. We need to develop a structured manner of involving our students and youths in the political process. I think it may not be out of place to lower the age qualification for certain elective offices in the next constitutional amendment exercise.”

    He said political apathy among young people, is translating to low voters’ turnout, adding that such an attitude must change.

    “Many young people are not involved in voting during elections which threatens the representative nature of our democratic institutions,

    “This country belongs to you but it’s under the stranglehold of men and women of a generation that have overreached itself. The truth is that nothing will be ceded or conceded to your generation without a fight. In this endeavor, your voices mean nothing if you don’t have the votes.

    “Therefore, all students in Nigeria must not only register to vote and cast their votes during elections, they must also ensure that their votes, count. There is  no other better way by which you will earn respect for yourselves and ensure that the gifts you have taken to the university to polish ultimately benefit your generation.”

    Dogara however urged the students to seek a balance between student unionism, activism and academic excellence.

    “Young students like you possess abundance of passion, drive and the spirit of adventure thus risk taking comes naturally to the young. The idealism of youth must, however, be tempered by the need to excel academically in school. Any student who places activism over academics will sooner than later be left behind by his classmates. You must therefore strike the right balance between activism and academic and social progress.”

    “I believe strongly that the culture of peaceful protest, demonstrations and general activism is not only necessary in a democratic state but is in fact a constitutional right. This ensures accountability of government to the people. Resistance to tyranny, crusade for justice and good governance require courage, patriotism and ideological purity.

    “It was Martin Luther King, Jnr, who said that: “freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor, it must be demanded by the oppressed”. Indeed, ‘the man dies in all who keep silent in the face of tyranny’, to paraphrase Prof Wole Soyinka. The culture of protest that I endorse must be uncompromisingly peaceful and non-violent. It must be based on selflessness and not aided by ambition or corruption. It must be for the right reasons and procured only by the purest of motives.

    “It must not be based on propaganda and misinformation. It must be non-partisan. Students should never allow themselves to be used by politicians to score political points or by state or non-state actors to pick sour grapes on their behalf.”

    On the issue of youth unemployment, the Speaker assured the students that the House takes youth unemployment in Nigeria as a top priority “which is why as part of the Sectoral Debates of the House of Representatives, it is engaging the executive on how to diversify the economy and create jobs for our people.”

    The Senate leader, Senator Ali Ndume who represented the Senate President Bukola Saraki said it was important for the students to learn the workings of the Parliament

    He added that Leadership begins at the level of the students. The young ones, he said, are the leaders of tomorrow and hope of the country. He urged them not to be derailed.

  • Constitution amendment: We didn’t pocket N8b – Ekweremadu

    Constitution amendment: We didn’t pocket N8b – Ekweremadu

    Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, on Sunday said members of the Constitution amendment Committee of the 7th Senate did not pocket N8 billion as claimed by a report.

    Ekweremadu, who was chairman of the committee, said “fathom pocketing of public funds is a figment of the imagination of those behind the report.”

    He noted that the 4th Alteration of the Constitution by the National Assembly was not a failure as the report claimed, saying rather the Alteration was sabotaged by vested interests in the Presidency in order to abort some fundamental alterations.

    Ekweremadu said these in a statement issued by his Special Adviser on Media, Uche Anichukwu.

    He said the clarification became necessary following a report by an online medium that members of the National Assembly Constitution Amendment Committee pocketed N8 billion in a failed constitution amendment exercise.

    The statement said, “The Office of the Deputy Senate President wishes to state categorically that there was no ‘pocketing’ of N8 billion by members of the Committee on Constitution Review in the 7th Senate chaired by Senator Ekweremadu.

    “Such fathom pocketing of public funds is a figment of the imagination of the peddlers and their paymasters. For emphasis, the Senate Committee on Constitution Review does not have any account domiciled with the Guarantee Trust Bank as alleged by the report.

    “For clarity, constitution amendment as an expenditure item is covered by the Appropriation Act of each year and disbursed by the appropriate bureaucracy of the National Assembly for the purpose it was appropriated in accordance with extant rules.”

     

  • Constitution amendment: Senate  fails to override president’s veto

    Constitution amendment: Senate fails to override president’s veto

    THE question whether the National Assembly will override the veto of former President Goodluck Jonathan on the Fourth Alteration of the 1999 Constitution was laid to rest yesterday.

    Senators of the Seventh National Assembly, at their last session, finally failed to override the former president’s decision.

    The upper chamber, which ended the Fourth Session of the Seventh Senate yesterday, decided to postpone the touted veto override.

    Although the motion titled: “Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Fourth Alteration) Bill 2015 (SB.547) Veto Override”, was listed as the first business of the upper chamber, it was curiously dumped by the senators.

    The item was against the name of the Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, who was chairman, Senate Ad-hoc Committee on Constitution Review.

    Senate Leader Senator Victor Ndoma-Egba moved that the item should be taken in another legislative day.

    Unfortunately, another legislative day for the Senate would be the inauguration of the Eight Senate probably on June 9th, 2015.

    It is not clear why the Senate decided to defer the veto override to another legislative day. But observers were worried that the billions of naira spent to prosecute the constitution amendment would have been a waste of resources.

    Former President Jonathan had, while withholding assent to the Constitution Amendment Bill, claimed that the National Assembly did not follow laid down constitutional procedures in passing the Bill.

    The matter later went to the Supreme Court, which asked parties to the suit to settle out of court.

  • Constitution: Senate finally fails to override Presidential veto

    Constitution: Senate finally fails to override Presidential veto

    The question as to whether the National Assembly will override the veto of former President Goodluck Jonathan on the Fourth Alteration of the 1999 Constitution was laid to rest on Thursday.

    The Senate finally failed to override the presidential veto at its last session on Thursday.

    The upper chamber which ended the Fourth Session of the Seventh Senate decided to postpone discussion on the matter.

    Although “Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Fourth Alteration) Bill 2015 (SB.547)-Veto override” was listed as the first business of the upper chamber, it was curiously dumped by the Senators.

    The item was against the name of the Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu who was chairman, Senate Ad-hoc Committee on Constitution review.

    Senate Leader, Senator Victor Ndoma-Egba, moved that the item should be taken in another legislative day.

    However, another legislative day for the Senate would be the inauguration of the Eight Senate probably on June 9.

    It is not clear why the Senate decided to defer the veto override to another legislative day, but observers were worried that the billions of naira spent to prosecute the constitution amendment would have been a waste of resources.

    Former President Jonathan had, while withholding assent to the Constitution amendment Bill, claimed that the National Assembly did not follow laid down constitutional procedures in passing the Bill.

    The former President specifically said there was no evidence that the National Assembly complied with the provision of the constitution that the Constitution should be altered by the four-fifth majority.

    He said that instead of using four-fifth majority, the National Assembly used two-third majority to alter the Constitution.

    The matter went to the Supreme Court which asked parties to the suit to settle out of court.