Tag: Constitution

  • Attempts at auctochthonous constitution

    The Nigerian people have been dealt a double whammy, in the closing days of the Jonathan presidency. As things stand, both the new constitution from the Jonathan’s national conference and the national assembly arranged fourth constitutional amendment,may become relics of our political history. Tragically, the relics would have been accumulated at humongous costs to the tax payers. While the legislative enterprise cost about 4 billion naira, the executive business is said to cost not less than 7 billion naira. The monies were substantially spent to smother our duplicitous political elites; who gathered at the variously organised jamborees, even as the organizers appear to know they were merely playing poker, with our commonwealth.

    With the presidency and national assembly controlled by the same political party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP);it is a measure of the party’s lack of discipline that they choose to work at cross purposes. President Jonathan’s so called master stroke – the constitutional conference, has now turned out a mere smoke bubble. Yet at that time, the hopes of long suffering Nigerians were heightened that at last, Nigeria was about to have something close toan autochthonous constitution. Even when the president choose to heavily induce the selected members, with sums that beggars any patriotism, (a whopping 12 million naira, per person), many still invested hope in the conference.

    On their part the national assembly which refused to give a legislative imprimatur to the conference, also refused to entertain any budgetary allowance for it. To show to what dubious use the so called executive-wide votes can be put, Jonathan’s men were able to raise the billionsneeded to excessively pay-off, the 492 conferees, which this column called thenan ensnarement into “the gang of national treasury looters”. Because the tension which had risen following President Jonathan’s determined presidential ambition, suddenly ricocheted, as the selected troublesome elites busied themselves with sharing the billions; Bishop Matthew Kukah made the famous quip, that Jonathan has dealt his opponents ‘a master stroke’.

    As may be obvious now, the Jonathan’s master stroke was only successfully aimed against the national patrimony. Meanwhile, the quality of the men and women gathered by Jonathan, gave many the hope that something positive may yet come out of the exercise. After several weeks, the conference submitted a report which commentators claimed would revolutionize the political and socio-economic laws of the country; which no doubt is more unitary than federal. Unfortunately, instead of Jonathan’s presidency moving with speed to implement the recommendations that require mere executive actions, and also submit a bill on others to the national assembly, it choose to set up another committee over that report. Of course, all efforts to get Nigerians to give Jonathan a second term, with a promise to implement the recommendations if re-elected,have turned a mirage.

    On their part, with a mind-set, to cut the executive to size; the legislature in complete disregard to the fundamental principle of appropriation, also dug its heavy hand into the treasury, and with 4 billion in their pockets, they set-outon a nation-wide consultation (some called it a frolic), towards a fourth amendment of the 1999 constitution.In the particular effort of the lower chamber of the national assembly, a mini-conference was organized under the suzerainty of each Representative, to garner what they touted were the preferences of the people, from a list determined by the House. The senate also arrogantly set their minds to determine what the people wanted, as they organized town hall meetingswith their acolytes, which they passed-off as consultations.

    Pretending to be the only patriots, the national assembly members went ahead to fashion a fourth amendment, in their own image. One of the major highlights is the provision of mind boggling luxury for their principle officers, at retirement. They did not spare a thought about being one of the highest paid legislature in the world;which according to some sources, amounts to about 25% of the annual national budget. Having flagrantly over the years usurped the powers of anexecutive body, the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission, the gamers at the national assembly also tried to chip-off more powers from the executive;in further defiance of the fundamental principles of separation of powers, which is the bedrock of a presidential system of government.

    Just as the current regime is about to wind up, it has become evident that the 7th legislative house and the Jonathan executive,would jointly and severally carry home the moral baggage that goes with their respective ill-fated expensive jolly rides.While the legislature early enough sought to make a mockery of the constitutional conference, by refusing to gift it, a legal premise; the Jonathan presidency waited for its dying days to hand over to the legislature, a mock exam in constitutionalism. With clear malice against each other, the two prodigals have submitted their petty quarrel to the Supreme Court for adjudication.

    I support the intervention of the learned silk, Femi Falana (SAN), urging the national assembly and the presidency to come down from their high horses, and immediately seek a compromise in the interest of Nigerians. Eating such humble pie would enable the country gain a modicum of reform, if for instance, some provisions of chapter 11 of the 1999 constitution, dealing with fundamental objectives and directive principle of state policy,gains justiciability under the fourth amendment. At least, it would reduce the resources that would be available for more prodigality,in case the 8th national assembly retains their predecessor’s DNA. If for instance education is made a fundamental right, then there will be less resources for the executive to steal or mismanage. President Jonathan with few enduring legacies, should consider reaching a compromise with the legislators, instead of the double dealings against greater national interests.

     

  • Constitution amendments: President may veto bill from N’Assembly

    There were strong indications that the presidency may veto the bill on amendments to 1999 Constitution, which was sent to President Goodluck Jonathan by the National Assembly.

    The presidency was said to have spotted “awkward recommendations” in some of the amendments passed by the two chambers of the National Assembly.

    According to a top source in the presidency, the government discovered that the amendments did not satisfy the conditions for the alteration of the 1999 Constitution.

    Also, the Presidency picked holes in certain amendments, especially on life pension for the Senate President, Deputy Senate President, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and his deputy; and the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the each of the 36 State Houses of Assembly.

    A top presidency source said: “Based on some contradictions in the amendments and awkward recommendations, the President may veto amendments to the 1999 Constitution.

    “For instance, the National Assembly ought not to pass the amendments through voice vote, but they defied the required constitutional procedures. The presidency cannot be part of illegality. The amendments must substantially comply with the law.

    “The amendments will be returned to the National Assembly. If the lawmakers can effect corrections before the 7th Assembly ends, the president may assent to the alteration. Otherwise, the 8th National Assembly may complete the process.

    “The details of the observations of the presidency will be made available to the President of the Senate, David Mark, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Aminu Tambuwal.”

    Another source in the presidency said: “Some of the amendments are landlines for the president-elect and we do not want him to start with any constitutional crisis.

    “These lawmakers virtually stripped the president of some Executive functions. For instance, they recommended that the National Judicial Council should now appoint the Attorney-General of the Federation.

    “The NJC is only mandated to appoint judicial officers and the AGF is not a judicial officer.

    “Also, public opinion is against pension-for-life for some principal officers of the legislature as captured in some of these amendments. There is no way a reasonable president will run against public opinion. The economy cannot sustain such a huge out of office perks.”

  • Transition: Jonathan halts signing of amendments to constitution into law

    Transition: Jonathan halts signing of amendments to constitution into law

    Following the discovery of an extraneous recommendation, President Goodluck Jonathan has halted the signing of amendments to the 1999 Constitution into law.

    The outgoing President decided to avert creating any  problem for President-elect  Muhammadu Buhari.

    According to sources, the National Assembly, after harmonisation, amended 71  sections and some Schedules to the 1999 Constitution.

    The amendments include Sections 4, 7, 9, 45, 50A and 90A, which enshrine in the Constitution the establishment of National Assembly and State Houses of Assembly Service Commissions. Other sections passed include 59, 65 and 106, 67, 81, 82 and 122, 84 (4) (A – F), 89 and 129, 121, 124, 134 and 179, 174 and 211, 225, 228, 241, 251 and 285.

    But Jonathan and his team disagreed with the clause seeking to empower the National Judicial Council (NJC) to recommend the candidate for Attorney General of the Federation to the President. They believe that by  allowing NJC to recommend the Attorney-General of the Federation will amount to abuse of the principle of separation of powers.

    A source, who spoke in confidence, said: “The President was almost signing the new  amendments into law until the extraneous recommendation was discovered. The power to appoint either the Minister of Justice or the Attorney-General of the Federation cannot be ceded to the NJC by the President.

    “Also, the government looked at the functions of the NJC and there is no power allowing the body to appoint the Attorney-General of the Federation.

    “So, it is like whittling down the Executive powers of the President for no justifiable reasons. Whatever is the intention of the lawmakers, it is illegal to ask the NJC to appoint the AGF.

    “The President may send this amendment back to the National Assembly to take a second look at it.”

    Another source said: “Signing the amendment empowering the NJC to appoint the AGF  will amount to creating a challenge for the President-elect. Though the amendments preceded the election of Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, the new government might not see it so.

    “The President does not want to create any constitutional obstacle or crisis for the incoming administration and decided to withhold his assent.”

    In withholding his assent, it was not immediately clear if the President was also wary of the public outrage over pension for life for the President and Deputy President of the Senate; the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives.

    One of the amended sections says: “Any person who has held office as President or Deputy President of the Senate, Speaker or  Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives shall be entitled to pension for life at a rate equivalent to the annual salary of the incumbent President or Deputy President of the Senate, Speaker or Deputy Speaker  of  the House of Representatives.”

    The Constitution (Fourth Alteration) Bill, 2014 was passed in the Senate and House of Representatives respectively on Tuesday 21st  and Wednesday 15th October, 2014.

    The National Assembly transmitted same on Tuesday 28th October, 2014 to the State Houses of Assembly to fulfill the requirement  of Section 9(2) of the 1999 Constitution.

    The 36 State Houses of Assembly have forwarded their resolutions on the provisions of the Bill.

    Having satisfied Section 9( 2) of the Constitution, the amendments were processed in line with the Acts Authentication Act and transmitted to the President and Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria for his assent.

  • Lawyers urge Jonathan to sign amended Constitution

    Lawyers urge Jonathan to sign amended Constitution

    President Goodluck Jonathan has been urged to sign all the amendments effected on the Constitution and the Electoral Act (EA) by the National Assembly before Saturday to avoid a possible constitutional and legal crises during and after the elections.

    Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Sebastine Hon and the Executive Director, Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre (PLAC), Clement Nwankwo said in Abuja that it was imperative that the amendments were urgently assented to by the president to avert a possible chaos after the election and the transition period.

    Hon said it was necessary for the President to sign the amended Constitution into law, to avoid reverting to the 1999 Constitution (as amended) up to the 3rd Alteration Act.

    Nwankwo, who spoke during the unveiling of the Election Day Situation Room of Civil Societies Organisations (CSOs), and initiative of the Nigerian Civil Societies Situation Room, said the President’s signing of the amendment to the EA, will resolve the current issues surrounding the innovations introduced by INEC in the electoral process.

    Hon said: “With only about 72 hours or less left to the conduct of the Presidential election, grave constitutional implications lie in wait for all of us if these amendments are not signed into law.

    “In the first place, once elections are conducted, they would have been conducted pursuant to the current Constitution, hence the winners thereof can only take their oaths of office pursuant to and under the said current Constitution, the fact that Mr. President decides to sign it into law after the conduct of the elections notwithstanding.

    “Secondly, Election Tribunals and other courts trying election related matters must, by force of law, apply the existing Constitution as opposed to the amended one. This is because the Nigerian Constitution does not operate retroactively. The net will then be that all the efforts and resources expended in producing the constitutional document will be rubbished.

    “The further implication is that Nigerians will be deprived of enjoying the robust and dynamic alterations introduced by the legislature in the new constitutional document.

    “In legal jurisprudence, the law grows or is expected to grow at par with the society. So much has happened in the Nigerian society between 2011 and now, hence the imperative of the amendments introduced by the legislature in the amended constitutional document.

    “In other words, let Nigerians not be deprived of the enjoyment of the legal revolutions introduced by the legislature into the 4th Alteration Act.

    “I, therefore, again strongly urge Mr. President to sign the amended Constitution into law before Saturday the 28th of March, 2015,” Hon said.

    Nwankwo, who is also the coordinator of the Nigeria CSOs Situation Room, said “overall, the legal framework for the 2015 general elections provides satisfactory basis for the conduct of democratic elections in accordance with international principles and Nigeria’s international legal commitments.

    “However, a number of gaps still remain mainly due to the failure of the government to implement legal reforms proposed by INEC and other election stakeholders, suggesting, among other things, improvements in the process of appointment of INEC Commissioners, candidate nomination, campaign funding, regulation of voting procedure, women’s participation in politics and constituency delimitation,” Nwankwo said.

  • Eastern Bar adopts constitution

    Eastern Bar adopts constitution

    The Eastern Bar Forum (EBF) of  the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has adopted its amended Constitution The amendment is to make it more vibrant following calls for the forum’s abolition.

    Its chairman Mr. Igwenyi  O. Ogbonna explained why EBF did not adopt any candidate during the last NBA election, adding that zoning has come to stay.

    “All the five candidates that contested in the last election came from the defunct Western Region . None came from another region.

    “Because it was the turn of the West to present to us one of their own as preferred candidate, EBF waited and refused to endorse any of the contestants for the office of President. We had candidates of our choice for most of the elective offices but for the presidency, we did not.

    “Our reason for not adopting any of them stemmed from the fact that we had no mandate to choose for them who to endorse for the office.

    “Besides, as they say, it would amount to taking Panadol for another person’s headache. When they failed to endorse any of them, we from EBF decided that we shall vote according to our conscience for the office of president.

    “Don’t forget that we had our ears to the ground when it became open contest for the presidential hopefuls. All the candidates campaigned vigorously in all the branches of the EBF before the election hence we were able to note their relative strength and weakness.

    “ Austine Alegeh  (SAN), had the day because he came from the West and had a section of that region, Mid West, solidly behind him. Even though we did not formally adopt Alegeh, we knew that he had edge over his opponents. He is unassuming, intelligent, unpretentious and open to suggestions to move the Bar forward.

    “The best candidate won, Zonal arrangement in electing NBA president cannot be compromised in any election. Zoning has been canonized, any day it is brought to the floor of NEC for reaffirmation, you can only hear muffled dessent but the result will  be landslide” Igwenyi said.

  • Computer traders allege violation of constitution by leaders

    Members of the Computer and Allied Products Association of Nigeria (CAPDAN) have accused their leaders of violating their constitution.

    They said no election has been held in 10 years, which, according to them, is contrary to their constitution’s provision that there must be new leaders every four years.

    The traders alleged the tenure of the Ibrahim Tunji-led executive had since elapsed but the officers have remained in office in breach of their rules.

    They marched on the Computer Village in Ikeja, Lagos, and adjourning streets, bearing placards, some of which read: “Election must hold now!” “Saving the market is a must” “12 years in office is a slap!” “In credible election we believe, not selection!” “We need a change now!” among others.

    The traders urged the association’s board of trustees to “put a mechanism in motion” towards holding an election, saying: “We request that an Electoral Committee should be constituted immediately to enable them publish the election modalities as well as manage the electoral process.”

    A founding CAPDAN executive member, Mrs Abisola Isokpehi said another election is long overdue. Her words: “Why won’t a change be necessary in 10 years? Have you heard that a set of executives will be in office for 10 years? I’m one of the ‘excos’. We don’t call meetings, nothing; just two or three people parading themselves as CAPDAN executive officers and doing things we don’t know about. But that’s beside the point. How can we be in power for 10 years? As I speak we don’t even have an office or a secretariat. I am ready to let go as the auditor if an election will hold.”

    One of traders, Bayo Olawunmi, said: “Nobody is happy with the way the market is being run. All the stakeholders are complaining. They feel the present executives are not doing enough and they want a change. Up till this moment, no election of transition committee has been constituted.

    “We’re urging the state government to intervene. The Constitution says after four years, there must be an election, but none has been held for over 10 years. We need a lot of changes to be effected because the market is not well-regulated. We have a bad name of selling fake products because of lack of proper regulation and we are losing customers,” he said.

    However, CAPDAN’s Board of Trustees’ chairman Mr Ganiyu Alimi said arrangements were on to hold an election soon.

    “We had started the process before this agitation by the traders. We plan to appoint a caretaker committee. The president actually said he has stepped aside, giving room for an election to hold.

    “Before any credible election is held, there must be a new roster of members. That’s why we’re saying there should be a committee that will be in place to arrange these things. It is not automatic. Ask these people to show you their membership cards, many of them cannot,” he said.

  • Party amends constitution

    Party amends constitution

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) yesterday at the Old Parade Ground in Abuja ratified nine amendments to its constitution.

    The motion for the amendment was moved by Deputy National Chairman, North, Senator Lawal Shuaibu and seconded by Hon. Abike Dabiri Erewa from Ikorodu Federal Constituency of Lagos state.

    National Legal Adviser Dr. Muiz Banire read out the sections of the constitution being amended to include Article 13(2iv), Article 30(I), 15(a), 9.5, Article 8,  13(2a), 13.3(ii), 9.4c, 9.5(xx), 5.3(v) and 13.4.

    Section 31 of the constitution, which states that the Board of Trustees shall be the final authority as to the interpretation of any aspect of the constitution and its ruling shall be final, the deleted from the constitution.

    Delegates from the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory attended the convention, which had only one item on the agenda – amendment of the party constitution.

    After the motion was seconded, National Organising Secretary Senator Osita Izunaso called for a voice vote to adopt the amendment.

  • Judgment on hijab against the Constitution, says MSSN

    Judgment on hijab against the Constitution, says MSSN

    The Lagos area unit of the Muslim Students’ Society of Nigeria (MSSN) has described the decision of the Ikeja High Court to uphold the ban of hijabs in primary and secondary schools in the state as a rape on the constitution.

    Justice Grace Onyeabo last Friday ruled against the MSSN suit against the Lagos State government, saying such practice would affect the secular nature of state.

    The MSSN rejected the judgment, saying it would deny Muslim students their rights to observe a practise of their religion.

    The Amir (president), Kaamil Kalejaiye, accused the judge of neglecting facts and misinterpreting the law, stressing that the Constitution and international charters guaranteed the freedom of religion of everyone.

    Kalejaiye said: “It is shameful that the judge denied the students a right that is not only godly but also supported by the Constitution. Do we call that a misinterpretation of the constitution or rape on the law? We want to believe that the judge’s wisdom is not above the provision of the constitution. While we remain undaunted and won’t relent on our resolve to get female pupils dress according to Islam tenets, we reject in totality the judgment and urge every Muslims to do so.”

    The MSSN said it was only demanding enforcement of the right of Muslim student and not a favour from the government. Kalejaiye said the Society had started consultation with members and sympathisers, including parents to prepare for the next line of action.

    Kalejaiye insisted that the judgment was not fairly served, noting that the action of the government to allow the use of hijab during Islamic Religion Knowledge classes and Jumaat prayer showed that it was permissible.

    He added: “There is contradiction in the judgment and the provisions of the Constitution. While the judge claims that Nigeria is a secular state, the Constitution recognises two major religions, which are Islam and Christianity. It must be noted that the government finances the schools with tax paid by our parents and indirect tax by us. So, we have rights to demand for what is lawful under the Constitution.”

    The MSSN Amirah (female leader), Hafsah Badru, said hijab could not distort the secularity of the state. She said there had not been punishment for harassment of Muslim pupils for using hijab.

    “Some states in the Southwest, such as Ekiti have granted the use of Hijab in schools and they don’t have problem with maintaining their secularity as claimed by the judge. Why should Lagos be different? Wearing hijab is constitutional and must be seen as such,” Hajia Badru said.

    The counsel to the MSSN, Chief Gani Adetola-Kassim (SAN), said the Society would appeal the judgment.

    Adetola-Kassim said: “The court has spoken, but there are many issues to be considered, which means that we will appeal the judgment. We are simply not satisfied with the court decision. The angle through which the court looked at the issue was at variance with the provisions of the constitution. We will definitely appeal.”

  • Our dream constitution, by UNILAG students

    Our dream constitution, by UNILAG students

    Controversies have been trailing the drafting of a new constitution for the University of Lagos (UNILAG) Students’ Union Government (SUG), which the management is planning to restore. To students, the document must reflect their wishes. Occupants of Saburi Biobaku Hall have held a meeting to debate some of its likely provisions. MODIU OLAGURO (400-Level Education and Mathematics) reports.

    The management of the University of Lagos (UNILAG) has unveiled plans for restoring students’ unionism. It has inaugurated a committee to draft a new constitution and midwife election into the offices of the Students’ Union Government (SUG).

    This means it will be the first time in about 10 years that students will be electing their SUG leaders. For many, it is cheery news because a constituted students’ union would give them a platform to channel their views about their welfare.

    To ensure the proposed constitution truly reflects the yearnings of students, residents of Saburi Oladeni Biobaku Hall last Thursday’s evening held a meeting to make their input and suggestions to the proposed constitution.

    The meeting was anchored by the hall chairman, Moyosore Adebanjo, and attended by class representatives and hall executives. Each room in the hall was represented.

    Moyosore said the meeting was necessary to make students have inputs in the union constitution.

    “The draft is very fundamental as it goes a long way in defining our stay on campus. It is a reference point to address a way forward in the university,” he said.

    Briefing the students on the controversy and suspicion that greeted the proposed name of the union, a member of the drafting committee, Tobi Adeyoyin, a student, informed the gathering that it would be an aberration to have two legitimate students’ union governments on a campus, noting that the proposed union name, University of Lagos Students’ Union (ULSU) was acceptable to the management.

    Students want their union to be UNILAG Students’ Union Government (ULSUG).

    Tobi said previous students’ union leaders adopted “government” to be part of the union’s name because they wanted to differentiate it from military government.

    Several issues were argued during the meeting. One was consensus or voting method of selecting their leaders. The students also deliberated on whether Halls of Residence should be considered as constituencies, high Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) as eligibility requirement for elections, candidates’ year of study, justification for the non-inclusion of the judicial council in the drafting of the constitution and non-involvement of campus journalists to cover the electoral process.

    A room representative, Adesola Oyetomi, faulted the draft constitution, noting it would not reflect students’ wishes because it did not provide for Students’ Judicial Council (SJC). “A government without a judiciary lacks basis. I urge the people drafting the constitution to incorporate a judicial system that should be headed by a student in the Faculty of Law,” he said.

    Tobi gave reasons for the exclusion of a judicial council in the drafted document, saying: “ULSU Judicial Council was scrapped because of the lack of substantial responsibility; we strongly feel the congress can wade in into any legal case and if it remains unsolved, the Faculty of Law can be brought in.”

    For Michael Adeyemi, the press club should be engaged in the drafting of the constitution. Besides, the draft must restrict students with carry overs from aspiring for offices, he said.

    Temitope Nelson, a student, made a case for students’ congress to be held in hostels. He said: “The faculty is the students’ workplace while their hostels are home. The students’ congress should be brought to the hall for everyone to participate.”

    At the end of the session, Moyosore submitted a summary of the occupants’ contributions to the constitution, saying the union should comprise four arms, namely the executive, legislature, congress and judiciary.

    The students also wanted the membership of the judicial council to be open to all students irrespective of course of study. In a unanimous decision, the meeting agreed that Halls of Residence be made constituencies and have representatives in the congress. They wanted press club to be part of the constitution drafting committee.

    On the basic academic requirement for eligibility to contest for offices, the students recommended a CGPA of 2.5 as against the 3.0 proposed in the draft document.

  • Lawyers reject Wali’s constitution amendment

    Lawyers have rejected attempts by the immediate past President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA)  Okey Wali (SAN) to effect fundamental changes in the constitution of the association and alter its leadership and administrative structure.

    This brings an end efforts by the immediate past two regimes of the association to restructure the secretariat and model same after the International Bar Association (IBA ) structure.

    The restructuring of the secretariat   whittles down the powers of elected national officers of the NBA and vests them on the secretariat staff headed by the Executive Director, who is at the beck and call of  the President.

    Under the Wali administration, elected NBA national officers were mere observers.

    They were addressed as national officers by name but had no powers to act in their respective offices.

    They   had no offices at the NBA secretariat from where to perform  their statutory duties. In effect, the last administration made them almost redundant.

    NBA national officers including the three Vice-Presidents had to ride in cabs while in Abuja on NBA duties while official cars are parked at the secretariat.

    However, Wali’s bid to institutionalise what many have come to see as an anomaly was roundly rejected by the lawyers.

    They rejected 24 out of his proposed 33 amendments to  NBA  constitution. Presenting his report,  chairman of the committee, Mr.Okey Amechi (SAN) thanked lawyers for the  confidence reposed on him and his committee during the conduct of the last NBA elections when lawyers voted simultaneously for election of new officers and constitution ammendment.

    The proposal to introduce Associate membership into the association was rejected with all the purported advantages and privileges. The proposal for the association to publish on its website the names of defaulting lawyers in the payment of Practising fees by the fist of April as provided by the Financial Secretary was also rejected.

    Also rejected was the proposal to appoint an Executive Director of Administration who shall be in charge of the Directorate of the association with all the responsibilities attached thereto. The power of the President to appoint and remove such Executive Directors was also rejected. The proposal to stop any of the NBA branch of the NBA from instituting legal action kin court  against the association without first having such a dispute heard and determined by the President or a Committee set up for that purpose or the NEC of the NBA was also thrown into the dustbin.

    Wali’s  proposal for the National Executive Committee to remove from office any erring  National Officer found guilty of any misconduct was rejected but the proposal to remove from office any National Officer who commits fraud or becomes bankrupt or insolvent was approved. Also approved was the amendment to remove from office an officer who accepts appointment from any arm of the government ( except as a member of an adhoc committee or panel), the proposal to remove an officer who is convicted of any offence by a Court of competent Jurisdiction was also approved.

    Also approved was the proposal to remove from office, any officer who: breaches any of the provisions of the Code of Conduct for officers duly approved by the NEC,  or who engages in public misconduct owing to intoxication by alcohol, drugs or other intoxicants or stimulants or any bestial acts; who engages in any Act of behaviour that brings or is likely to bring the association into disrepute; acts of disobedience to the association, NEC, the President or any of its organs.

    Provided,  however, that such officer may be removed from office by two thirds majority of NBA NEC members present at a meeting of the NEC where the matter is raised.

    The proposal to abolish the offices of the Assistant Financial Secretary, Assistant Publicity Secretary and Second Assistant Secretary  were also rejected by lawyers.