Tag: controversies

  • Controversies envelop African Athletics championships

    The African Athletics Championship in Nigeria have become a source of friction as competitors struggle to reach host city Asaba while some nations have given up and dropped out.

    The schedule for the competition, running from August 1-5, has been reworked on a “when can you get here” basis as unhappy athletes have been

    held up at Abuja and Lagos airports, blocked by visa issues or a lack of flights.

    Photos of the athletes sleeping on their luggage at the airports have flooded social media.

    Some 400 entrants from 14 countries had to be put up in Lagos hotels. Kenya’s 60-strong team camped at Lagos airport for two days. Neighbours Tanzania did not even bother sending their much smaller team and withdrew.

    On Thursday, a huge water tank, built to supply a swimming pool that is still under construction, collapsed outside the stadium, crushing parked cars and increasing fears that facilities had been built in too much of a rush. Athletes have complained about a bumpy running track.

    Solomon Ogba, chairman of the local organising committee, told a press conference on Thursday that after Nigeria won the right to hold the championships none of its regions wanted to act as host, and that the Delta State had taken the role to save the event.

  • Davido: Thriving on controversies

    HIP hop act, David Adedeji Adeleke a.k.a Davido, is no stranger to sensational headlines. Since he burst into the music scene as an 18-year old in 2011, with his single, ‘Dami Duro,’ the artiste has continually given fodder to the media. Be it his stormy relationships with women, face-off with security or penchant for flaunting his wealth on the social media, Davido attracts controversies.

    Hence, Davido, now 25, was cruising on familiar turf when he shared an Instagram video in which he presented a N45million Porsche car to his girlfriend, Avril Chioma Rowland, as she celebrated her 23rd birthday.

    Expectedly, the expensive gift got tongues wagging. While some wondered why Davido, who has two daughters from two different baby mamas, would decide to shower his girlfriend with such an expensive gift, others celebrated with Chioma and wished for her kind of luck. Some simply poked fun at Davido. For instance, Comedian Ayo Makun a.k.a AY, joked about blocking Davido from his wife.

    In 24 hours, the video garnered over one million views on YouTube, prompting speculations that the artiste’s action was a publicity stunt to promote his new single “Assurance.”

    Soon after he posted the video of his mind-blowing gift to Chioma, Davido tweeted that he rejected a $60million endorsement deal, asking that the offer be increased to $100milion thus amplifying suspicions that he was perfecting a publicity stunt.

    Davido also revealed that he has been dating Chioma, who is reportedly a cook and goes by the Instagram handle, Chef Chi, for five years. According to him, Chioma, a Babcock University, undergraduate, is a ‘good girl’ and that’s why he’s in love with her.

    At the backdrop of his claims, pundits wonder what kind of “good girl” would stand her lover impregnating a random girl and flaunt her to the world while he keeps her from the spotlight? Many more imagine how much tears she shed to attract the gift of a Porsche? “Why didn’t Davido propose to Chioma if he truly loved her?” they wonder. As the social space excites over Davido’s wondrous gift to his beau, entertainment and celebrity buffs acknowledge that Davido has found his niche as a pop idol and newsmaker. While it’s exhilarating to read of Davido’s current jaunt, the artiste has had his share of ugliness too.

    Few people would forget in a hurry his messy fight with ex-girlfriend and mother of his lovechild, Sofia Momodu, and her uncle, Dele Momodu (Ovation publisher) last year. The artiste accused Sofia of feeding his daughter, Imade, with Cannabis, an allegation which sparked controversy across the social media. He would derogatorily sing ‘Dele na my boy,’ though he didn’t specify the actual Dele he meant in the wake of the incident. Davido and Momodu have, however, reportedly mended fences, as the artiste performed at the publisher’s Ovation red carol last December. Also, last year, a 26-year-old lady, Ayotomide Labinjo, accused Davido of fathering her three-year-old daughter, Aanuoluwapo, claiming they had sex on two different occasions in 2013. Though, Davido denied it, Labinjo said they met in Ibadan, Oyo State after his performance in a night club and a month later when he attended Gbenga Adeyinka’s Easter show. “When I told him I was pregnant at the end of March 2013, he said I should keep it but the following morning, he blocked me from his Blackberry Messenger list,” she disclosed in an interview.

    “I could not reach him throughout the period I was pregnant. On each of the days we met in Ibadan, he had a police and three body guards with him.” A paternity test would, however, absolve Davido of being Aanuoluwapo’s father. Recall, Davido’s first daughter had to go through DNA testing before he claimed her as his. Last year, the artiste also lost three friends in controversial circumstances and in quick succession. On October 3, 2017, Davido’s friend, Tagbo Umeike, died on his birthday, after a night out with the artiste. Reports said he died after drinking 30 shots of Tequila, winning a bet of an iPhone 8 and N200, 000 allegedly placed by Davido. But Tagbo’s girlfriend, Caroline Danjuma, didn’t agree that he died from drinking too much alcohol. Rather, the Nollywood actress said Davido knew more about Tagbo’s death than he was revealing. “No one is accusing anyone of being a murderer but we need to know what happened and why everyone is quiet,” said Caroline in an interview.

    “My anger is that he was abandoned by those supposed to be his friends and brothers. Davido and Tagbo were very close and I am angry with Davido for keeping quiet,” she said. In the wake of Caroline’s accusation, Davido sang, ‘Caroline, that one na gold digger.’ No one can categorically say, however, if Davido was referring to the actress in the song. He was, however, absolved from blame by the Police over Tagbo’s death. But for all the controversies he courts, Davido flaunts a generous spirit. He reportedly bought an iPhone X for his crew and when he found out that the family of Utibe, a child fan who sang his song, ‘If’ on Instagram was homeless, Davido provided money to build them a house. Also, recently, the singer was in the news when he paid N15million for a an aviation staff’s surgery.

  • A governor and his controversies

    NEW occupants of offices are usually said to hit the ground running. For Governor Yahaya Bello of Kogi State, however, it has been more of hitting the ground fighting, given the controversies that have dogged his administration since he assumed office in 2016. Not a few people would adduce the development to his ruling style, which more often results in negative perception of his administration by followers of events in the Confluence State.

    From the beginning of his administration, Bello, whose admirers fondly refer to as  the ‘white lion,’  has been embroiled in a dark struggle to assert himself.

    Having inherited votes won by the party’s flag bearer, the late Prince Abubakar Audu, at the November 21, 2016 state governorship poll, Bello faced an uphill task of taking control of the state’s political machinery.

    Measures taken by him to establish his leadership, however, incited the ire of political associates, resulting in an unending war of attrition in the state.

    Notwithstanding the challenges before him, Bello surged frontally, taking the battle for the control of Kogi’s political machinery; through his New Direction policy agenda and other measures, including his political chess battle at the Kogi’s House of Assembly, which saw no less than two speakers replaced, Bello has been in the news for controversial reasons. Other contentious actions taken by him include the prolonged staff verification exercise and his tiff with organised labour in the state.

    His lingering war of words and supremacy with Senator Dino Melaye, however, assumes more sordid manifestations, even as his party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), battles internal crisis in the state. Bello’s alleged non-recognition of the Haddi Ametuo-led APC exco and formation of a parallel one reportedly aggravated the acrimonious tussle within the party. It alienated the ruling party into rival factions. It would be recalled that Ametuo claimed that the governor got his mandate through the grace of God after the demise of Abubakar Audu, the candidate of the party, who was already coasting to victory before his sudden death. Ametuo reportedly contended that all the party members who worked and spent their resources during the election were sidelined by the governor. He alleged that most of the appointments made by Bello’s government were done by his Chief of Staff, Edward Onoja.

    “This governor appointed over 200 aides – from commissioners to SSAs and out of the 286, only 43 are original APC members. You can imagine that the rest are PDP. That is the crux of the matter. Over 80 percent of those in Bello’s cabinet are a mixture of the PDP and non-party members. It cannot be sustainable for APC’s continuity in 2019,” said Ametuo. In the wake of the impasse, the parallel APC faction loyal to Bello scornfully referred to the Ametuo group as the Diaspora APC, because they allegedly took a wide berth from the state. Other controversial actions of Bello include his rationalization and layoff of over 150 lecturers at the state-owned university and proscription of unionism in all tertiary institutions in the state. The governor also incited criticism and bitter opposition to his ceding of land for cattle ranching.

    His controversial proposal to sell Kogi properties, volte-face on dissolution of state and LG excos, among others, provoked widespread dissent to his administration. Speaking with The Nation, a retired local government employee said from his base in Idah, that workers there were paid 25 percent of their salary. “I can tell you authoritatively that the workers got 25 percent for their February salary”, he said. Amidst outcry from various interest groups, Bello was the first to embrace the Federal Government’s cattle colony initiative. The governor allegedly said, in response to critics, at a stakeholders’ meeting with the people of Kogi Central: “People cannot offer us reconciliation with one hand and try to stab us in the back when we embrace them. “It does not matter to them that Kogi State belongs to all of us.

    Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred,” he said, adding that the fortunate aspect was that the antagonism “merely gives his government more reasons to work harder in order to prove them wrong.” The governor is certainly not a stranger to theatrics; few hours after he announced the retirement of his political advisers and dissolution of executive councils at the state and local government levels, Bello rescinded his decision thus enacting the fastest policy somersault or cold feet. As at the time of filing this report, the governor is grappling with a sprained ankle following an accident during a recent function in Lokoja, the state capital. Bello subsequently appeared in crutches at the Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting in Abuja, in the wake of the mishap.

  • Bello: A governor and his controversies

    Bello: A governor and his controversies

    Many indigenes of Kogi State are up in arms against Governor Yahaya Bello over what they describe as his style of governance. The governor has also incurred the wrath of his people for supporting the proposal for the creation of cattle colonies by the Federal Government. JAMES AZANIA reports.

    Less than a week after the killing of 73 people and the maiming of others in Benue State by suspected Fulani herdsmen, Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello, along with a handful of his colleagues, were at the Aso Rock Villa, Abuja, ostensibly to endorse President Muhammadu Buhari for a second term in office. The development drew the ire of some people, who condemned the purpose and timing of their visit.

    A week later, Bello announced that Kogi will support the establishment of cattle colonies in its domain, as announced by the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Chief Audu Ogbeh.

    The minister said that work will commence next week on cattle colonies in states that have indicated interest to establish them.

    He disclosed this during a visit to the Agriculture and Veterinary Complex of the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.

    He said that the National Economic Council has set up a 10-member committee, comprising the Vice President, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, as chairman and nine governors to facilitate the commencement of the colonies.

    He said: “One of the most topical issues we have today is that of farmers and herdsmen clashes. If we do not deal with it quickly, we run the risk of damaging the harmony and the co-existence of Nigeria as a country. The killings are getting too many.

    “In our attempt to solve the problem, we have proffered certain solutions but perhaps we were not sensitive enough to Nigeria’s fragile sensitivities and suspicions. When we spoke of colonies, we were immediately greeted with reactions that this was an attempt to cease Nigeria’s land and give to the Fulanis to colonise. The intention is not for Fulanis or anyone to colonise any territory. It is to provide a haven for cattle to graze in peace under controlled environments to prevent the conflicts between farmers and herdsmen.

    “Only yesterday, a committee was set up by the Vice President with members, most of them, state governors discussing this matter and resolving that states that are interested will begin work on this matter as soon as next week.”

    While some other states, including Benue, have outrightly rejected the idea, Bello, who had in the past said that the Fulanis, including the herdsmen were welcome in Kogi, agreed to it.

    Despite his explanation for the open arms policy towards the Fulanis, some of the stakeholders in the state, kicked against it.

    Throwing his weight behind the initiative, Governor Bello said that it is being wrongly perceived by segments of the society. According to him, the initiative would benefit farmers, herdsmen and the citizens.

    In a statement by his Chief Press Secretary (CPS), Petra Onyegbule, the governor said the President decided to take the measure to curb the incessant bloody clashes between farmers and herdsmen across the nation.

    He added: “This move will also enhance the security of lives and property of the people of Kogi State”.

    He allayed the fears of residents that communally-owned land would be handed over to Fulanis, saying the policy is not an indirect attempt by the Federal Government to parcel their land to the herdsmen.

    He continued: “To ensure that everyone is carried along, Kogi State through the Ministry of Agriculture will soon be embarking on a series of stakeholders’ engagements to sensitise the people, farmers, cattle breeders and other stakeholders on the implementation of the new policy.

    “Traditional rulers, leaders of various communities, opinion leaders, religious leaders and the entire citizens will be carried along in the course of the engagement, so that we can collectively study the merits and demerits of the policy. The insinuations and speculations from various quarters nationwide that the Federal Government is conspiring to take over communal land and give it to herdsmen are far from true. The planned cattle colonies are for the interest of our people.”

    Worried by the prounancement, the people of  the nine local government areas in Kogi-East petitioned President Buhari, saying that they have rejected the idea of a Fulani cattle colony in Igala land.

    In the petition by the President of the Igala Project, Mr. Atayi Babs, and the Secretary-General, Mallam Musa Haruna,  they outlined their oppositiin to the idea, stating that it will lead to the breakdown of law and order.“Our people, who are largely farmers, are not prepared to host Fulani herdsmen or cattle colony masters in our land,” they said.

    It reads: “Our position is further reinforced by the multiple acts of war and mayhem being unleashed daily on our innocent farmers and hapless law-abiding citizens in their villages, homes and farmlands by rampaging Fulani herdsmen.

    “Mr. President, between June 2015 and December 2017, Igala land has witnessed several incidences of killings as a result of herdsmen violence in several areas, including Ebeje where eight people were killed and farms set ablaze; Agbada/Agojeju, where 19 people were slaughtered; Edede two persons were killed; six people killed in Oganenigu; three people killed in Ojapata; five people killed in Ojuwo Anawo. All these happened in Dekina Local Government Area.

    “The story is not different in Ofu Local Government Area, at Ojuwo Omachi and Akpagidigbo, where the incessant attacks of herdsmen have claimed the lives of over 20 persons. In Abejukolo and Bagana in Omala local government areas, the reign of terror resonates loudly, so much that our people no longer move freely, to and from their farmlands, because of the fear of killings, maiming and rape, with some villages like Ebakume wholly sacked and entire farm produce granaries/silos completely burnt.

    “Despite the brazen nature of the aforementioned acts of criminality by these would-be occupants of the so-called cattle colony, none of them has been arrested or made to account for these crimes, as these heavily armed cattle herders terrorise our land, flaunting their prowess in the handling of AK 47 rifles and double barrel guns.

    “Mr. President, our opposition to this move and the hasty approval given by the Kogi State Governor is further reinforced by the inescapable fact that under your Presidency, murderous Fulani herdsmen have enjoyed subtle protection and favouritism to the extent that these herdsmen, who now treat Nigeria as a conquered territory, will eventually go beyond the purview of the so-called colony to destroy farmlands, maim and kill under the slightest provocation.

    “In view of the above and many more, we the undersigned concerned people of Kogi-East, Kogi State, North-Central, Nigeria state as follows:

    “We do not want cattle colony or grazing reserve in our land. We reject any attempt to convert or transfer the ownership of ancestral lands in Igala land to cattle colony master or owners who operate by killing people, destroying communities wholesale, and destroying farmlands while enjoying government protection from counter attack, arrest or prosecution. We reject attempts to turn Igala land into the next killing field of marauding Fulani herdsmen.”

    In a similar petition titled: “Kogi West Rejects Establishment Of Cattle Colonies”, Senator Dino Melaye, the lawmaker representing the district at the National Assembly, condemned the governor for embracing the idea.

    He stated: “It is not surprising that the governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, will quickly but strangely meet with the Minister of Agriculture in order to make our dear Confluence State as a pilot state for the proposed cattle colonies in the country. The governor’s latest shenanigans is not surprising in the sense that money is involved. The Federal Government will definitely make funds available to Bello to kick-start the pilot scheme in Kogi State.

    “Therefore, as a true representative of the people of Kogi West senatorial zone and on behalf of my constituents, we warn in strong terms that our soil, land, water and air cannot be used for cattle colonies. Let it be clear to all the insensitive people behind the idea that Kogi West will resist the establishment of any cattle colony within our domain politically, spiritually, traditionally and with any means available within the ambit of the law”.

    A community leader from the Kogi East, Chief Alhassan Ejike, called on the governor to jettison the idea, saying it is an invitation to breakdown of law and order, warning the governor not to venture into the establishment of cattle colonies in any part of the state in order to avoid any looming disaster that will follow such an open invitation to herdsmen.

    “You are not the owner of Kogi and you cannot allocate a land that doesn’t belong to you to foreigners,” he said.

    While the governor is being criticised at home, commendation has come from outside, with Governor Tanko Almakura of Nassarawa State described him as a good ambassador of President Buhari.

    He hailed his Kogi State counterpart for upholding the leadership ideals of President Buhari.

    Kingsley Fanwo, the media aide to the governor, said that Almakura gave the commendation while receiving Bello at the Government House, Lafia, saying Bello has been an advocate of a united Nigeria.

    Almakura said: “The visit of Bello and others to Benue to sympathize with the people, was a loud testimony of the unity and peace that exists among the APC governors.

    “Let me use this opportunity to thank Governor Yahaya Bello for standing up for a united Nigeria. He is a governor that possesses the leadership qualities of Mr. President.

    “We are keeping track of the achievements of your administration in Kogi State. Let me tell you that you have made our party proud. You are promoting the core ideals of our great party.”

  • Davido: Times Caroline Danjuma has sparked controversies on social media

    Davido: Times Caroline Danjuma has sparked controversies on social media

    Known for sparking controversies on the social media and deleting them almost immediately, former actress and mother of two, Ms Caroline Danjuma was at it again, when on Wednesday, she accused pop singer, David Adeleke, aka Davido of dumping the corpse of a young man by name Tagbo at an undisclosed General Hospital in Lagos.

    Although she had since deleted the post, the uproar it generated continues to generate reactions in the media.

    While it is yet unclear, the circumnstances under which Tagbo died, picture and video evidences pointing to Davido’s acquaintance with the deceased surface, lending credence to their frolickiAng moments shortly before his demise.

    Reacting to the accusation, Davido denied involvement in Tagbo’s death, making little or no revelations on his snapchat page.

    “RIP Tagbo, God knows the truth! People are just wicked. This is what I get for treating everyone like my brother. I was deeply saddened to hear of the sudden death of my friend, Tagbo. First and foremost, my sincere condolences and prayers are with his family and friends at this time. I’ve been in this position before multiple times and also of recent. But it is also disappointing that false information and complete lies have been put out there, using my name as usual. Out of total respect for Tagbo and his family, I will not discuss this matter further for now,” said Davido.

    While it is still not clear the circumstances surrounding his death, footage has emerged of the late Tagbo, having a nice time with friends at a club on his birthday.

    Although there is nothing in the clip to determine date of event, the young man was seen in the company of friends of tequila shots. A voice could be heard telling him jokingly; “Tagbo you no get money oh! Tagbo How far?”

    Fans have since called out Caroline Danjuma for accusing Davido, with many giving instances the former actress had uploaded controversial posts on Instagram, only to take them down after a few minutes.

    Sometime ago, Caroline threw a shade on social media without mentioning the name of whom it was directed. And when followers started insinuating the alleged person could be Linda Ikeji, in view of her then media drama with Wizkid, she deleted the post.

    She once talked about broken homes in a post she captioned “#prayforthechildren”, but deleted it as soon as fans started making comments about her marriage.

    She was also at loggerheads with singer Cynthia Morgan over the latter’s controversial promo photo.

  • Koko: Another ‘toxic’ waste, many controversies

    Koko: Another ‘toxic’ waste, many controversies

    The dumping of waste, alleged to be toxic has pitted an indigenous company, Ebenco Global Services, against a section of Koko community in Delta State.  S’South Regional Editor, Shola O’Neil, who recently visited the town reports on the controversy and why it has pitted the community against itself.

    KOKO, the historic Itsekiri town and headquarters of Warri North local government area, Delta State, has again grabbed national headline  for yet another uncomplimentary reason. Like almost 30 years ago, the story that is taking the town to global media sphere is the alleged deposition of huge quantity of waste materials alleged to be poisonous and carcinogenic.

    The once bustling port town on the fringe of the Benin River, Koko contributed to the fame and prosperity of the then Midwest Region (later defunct Bendel State), rivalling neighbours such as Sapele and Warri as a centre of commerce.

    Koko has a proud and long history of resistance; it is the land of the famous Chief Nnana Olomu, one of the foremost nationalists of the region, who defied the British, withstood them, paid the price but kept his pride.

    Its indigenes pride the sleepy town as the centre of the civilization and commercial activities of the 19th century. Pa JOS Ayomike, famous historian and scion of chief descendant of Nana, writes about its history with gusto, plumb and irrepressible fervour.

    But no fanciful prose can hide the fate that has befallen this historic town. From the height of being one of the towns touted to lead the industrial revolution of Delta State, to one receding to its infamous past and unwanted fame, the latest piece of bad news has hit the town hard. And the spectre of the sad incident and tragic memories of 1988 now defy the beautiful sky, fresh riverside peace, casting a dark pall over the town.

    The lost golden era

    Abandoned warehouses, mostly turned into churches, are the relics of what was once  a nostalgic reminder of the golden era that has been obliterated by the mistake of an innocent man who fell prey to a cunning Italian fraudster and merchant of death. Three decades ago thousands of poisonous chemicals were abandoned in the town by unscrupulous European businessmen. The incident challenged the legacies of the renowned tribal chief and first Niger Deltan nationalist (Nana) to be the memory conjured when Koko is mentioned.

    When our reporter visited the town last Wednesday, the languid air around the sleepy town was undisturbed. Residents moved about their normal businesses; industrial warehouses turned churches were opened; pastors and clergymen were doing their things  either preaching prosperity and miracle to members or invoking fire to consume their “enemies and demons”.

    Businesses on the street corners went on undisturbed. Traders sit behind their wares; the numerous boli (roasted plantain) sellers attended to customers, who ate the local delicacy soaked in bright palm oil and roasted ice-fish.  For N200, our reporter ate his fill, a ‘plate’, consisting of two giant sized plantain fingers and scubia fish soaked in the tasty sauce made from onion and pepper, while listening to local gist.

    Uduak (not her real name), the boli seller, told our reporter that her search for the greener pastures took her from Akwa-Ibom to Koko. Even if her sojourn hadn’t yielded much financial gain, she seemed contented and very happy in her surroundings. She bantered with her customers, one of whom asked her when (President) Buhari was coming for his regular launch of Boli.

    “Ha! oga if Buhari never chop this boli he nor de start work o,” one garrulous worker of a construction company in the town said in response to the puzzled look on our reporter’s face.

    The banters and laughter made the tasty meal even more enjoyable and everybody seemed happy with their lives.

    But underneath the façade of calm was the fear of the unknown. Several weeks ago, rumour started swirling that huge consignment of toxic industrial wastes had been deposited – and still arriving in the town.  The rumour got those old enough to remember the infamous incident of 1988 panicky; but the younger ones some of whom work for the ‘culprit’ company went about their daily activities.

    A cloud of smoke

    It was gathered that several weeks before our report, the report of the incident was presented to the Olu of Warri, Ogiame Ikenwoli, who ordered an investigation. The Itsekiri Leaders of Thought, under the leadership of Edward Ekpoko Esq., was also briefed on it.

    Yet, the Secretary of Koko Community, Mr Eric Mcgrey, who was contacted on the scare, said he was not even aware of it. He turned down our reporter’s request for a meeting, stressing, “I don’t know what you are talking about” before abruptly hanging up the phone on February 22.

    A few meters from the boli shop, on Atuwatse II road, an enclosed compound housing an insipid looking company, with a sign announcing ‘Ebenco Global Link Ltd’ seamlessly blended with its environment on the waterfront. But beyond dozens of trucks that ingress and exit the premises, not much is known about the activities going on therein.

    Workers at the company’s sites directed all enquiries to their oga. Not even the company’s website or Facebook page provided any insight other than the proclamation that it “is a leading company in the provision of waste management and environmental services in Nigeria.”

    Inside, cauldron puffed out billows of smoke that mix with the riverside air and escape into the atmosphere. Dozens of tanker trucks filed in and out of the premises. They come in empty but leave filled with loads of material suspected to be sludge and other wastes from oil facilities in the area. Heavy-duty equipment could be seen loading sharp sand from a barge berthed on the jetty into tipper trucks.

    Several signboards in the town touted Ebenco Global Link Ltd, Koko as a company that manages waste: “Waste Management is our Concern’, it reads.

    But how Ebenco is managing waste is a source of concern to some leaders and inhabitants of the area in the past months, especially to the Itsekiri Environment and Human Rights Group, which warned that the company could be unleashing another deadly cocktail of poisonous chemicals into the environment and endangering the lives of inhabitants.

    Their concern is shared by Dr Maxwell Iwegbue of the Department of Chemistry, Delta State University Abraka, who frowned at improper disposal of the waste. “Even wastes from peoples’ houses are not safe, but waste from emanating from petroleum and hydrocarbon activities are established carcinogens.”

    Various sources said the company has what is similar to a modular refinery at its jetty. From where petroleum products are extracted from sludge and slurry brought in at night. The wastes are transported to another of the company’s facility where the only treatment it gets is burial under the earth.

    The use of incinerator to burn off the waste is majorly another source of concern to residents of the area, who complained about soot blackening the air they breathe, resulting in various ailments. But their grievances are reportedly muffled by thugs working or in the payroll of the company and the fear of prominent local politician who is said to have a stake in the company.

    “Every night, they begin to burn some things and smoke would cover everywhere and people would sometimes wake up choking and suffocating,” a teenage boy who was studying while minding his parent’s shop, told our reporter.

    Everybody in Koko knows the owner of the company, simply identified as Ebenezer or Oluwagbemiga (?), a reticent middle-aged man said to be an indigene of neighbouring Ondo State. One of the young men at the waterside where his jetty is located told our reporter that the man is an ‘Odon’ (very influential, highly connected businessman) and stupendously rich.

    “He is very wealthy and connected,” another said, adding that Ebenezer’s business interests are as diverse as his allies. “Top oil industry operators, naval officials, security operatives in the Niger Delta know and relate with him and he does all things.”

    Around Koko, everybody knows the man; some speak of his generosity and his influence in the local economy and politics of the area, while others do not agree with his modus operandi.

    An Itsekiri activist and indigene of the community, Mr David Odeli, revealed that the company has staff strength of over 100 workers, most of who are locals.

    “There is no doubt that his company is contributing to the economy of Koko and its environs that is why we are advising people to be very cautious about anything that can create problem and scare away investors who can help mop up the teeming youths from the streets,” Odeli added.

    Our independent finding revealed some of the workers are deployed to an unmarked property located along the Koko-Ugbenu road. The site sits on a massive land, which is fenced off for security or from prying eyes. A cursory look at the yard revealed an innocuous looking scrap yard, dilapidated and mangled pieces of cargo containers, unserviceable trucks and septic tanks.

    The facility is located near a new government school around the Uduaghan Layout, in Koko. The only indications of any activity in the premises are rings of smoke of heavy equipment dancing into the burning air. This can be seen from the expressway and other parts of the growing exurb parts of Koko.

    Either by design or fluke, the façade of scrap metals screened equipment and other activities going on in the deep of the massive compound; bulldozers are opening up the earth. The chasms they create are filled with tons of sludge and slurry, which are then mixed with sand and covered up.

    The Itsekiri Environmental and Human Rights Group claimed that the sludge are toxic, carcinogenic and harmful to the health of people living around the area, especially pupils of a nearby primary school at Egbelemeji Junction, which borehole water could be contaminated.

    Chairman of Warri North LGA, Francis Maku, rose to the company’s defence and debunked this. The council boss slammed those behind it, insisting that there is no toxic waste in Koko’, much to the exasperation of activists and those calling for independent inquiries into the nature of the waste and how Ebenco is handling them.

    “The Chairman’s outburst, without getting a proper test on the materials, is strange and condemnable because he should be on the side of the citizens. But the interest here seems to be with the (alleged) polluter,” one source said.

    Initial report, which claimed that the wastes are shipped from the Chevron Nigeria Limited’s tank farm in Escravos turned out to be untrue. Esimaje Brikinn, General Manager, Policy, Government and Public Affairs, said, “CNL is aware of reports of alleged toxic waste said to have been dumped in Koko area of Delta State by a company; the company is not a contractor to CNL and does not provide waste management services to CNL.”

    The company insisted that it has a world-class system for managing its operation and waste.

     

    Our investigation revealed that the materials might be sourced from different locations, including an NNPC subsidiary in the area. The materials are transported by barges along the Benin River to Koko, where they are received at Ebenco’s jetty and trucked to the ‘scrap yard’ on the highway, after a crude refining process is used to remove petroleum products.

    The black tar journey

    The truck’s journey from Ebenco jetty leaves a trail of black, tar-like droppings on their trails to the final destination.

    Efforts of our reporter to get into the company were fruitless; the company’s workers seemed to have a mandate to deny visitors, especially journalists from entering.

    When our reporter accessed the facility through another property in the area, a bulldozer was seen covering up a large pit with slurry and sludge before topping up the opening with sand.

    Ebenezer, in a telephone chat with our reporter that lasted nearly six minutes on February 14, claimed that he was a victim of blackmail. He said, “This is mere sludge and it is not waste, but wealth to us because we are recycling them. How can we bury what we deem as wealth?” he queried.

    His claim of recycling the material was disputed by environmentalist and a federal lawmaker from the area, who asserted that the company lacked the capacity or equipment to recycle waste of such nature.

    “At best, what they do is to burn off some of those hydrocarbon wastes after extracting whatever they can. The company cannot recycle from that facility there in Koko,” an activist said.

    Ebenezer described those opposed to his company as disgruntled, stressing that he has the support of larger numbers of the community leaders. Later, in a paid advert in a national newspaper, he alleged that those antagonizing his company were using toxic waste as subterfuge to seek contract from the Nigeria Ecological fund.

    He accused his accusers of “witch-hunt and blackmail,” but refused to take subsequent calls to his telephone lines to expand on his cry of “campaign of calumny” and “deliberate attempt to ridicule our esteemed company”.

    Those opposed to the company include the IEHRG who took their protest to the Ministry of Environment and demanded a probe of the company’s operation.

    Mr Tony Ede, a retired staff of Central Bank of Nigeria and a former journalist with the Nigeria Television Authority (NTA), is head of the group. He covered the infamous incident of 1988 and warned that the latest saga might be equally devastating to the environment and people of Koko. The position confirmed an exclusive report by The Nation newspaper on February 16, with the headline, ’30 years later, another toxic scare hits Koko’.

    Mr Brown Dibofun, a member of the group, told our reporter that in spite of denials by the company and its agents, “scientific analysis conducted on soil, storm water and slurry as well as the environmental report prepared there from by Vertical Options Global Services Limited, showed that the slurry samples from the Ebenco Global Link dumpsite are toxic and carcinogenic, not environmentally friendly and are hazardous.”

    Some of these materials allegedly found include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), mercury, iron, chromium and other elements, which were said to be at a level that is unsafe for human. These materials are similar to the content of the toxic waste deposited in the town nearly 30 years ago.

    A toxicologist, who asked not to be quoted in this report because he works for a government agency and is not allowed to speak with the press, stated that if true, residents of Koko are in danger of cardiovascular diseases, cancer and deformation of foetuses.

    “It is very dangerous and a simple look at research result and studies or merely searching Wikipedia, will confirm that poly-aromatic carbon can lead to skin, organs and stomach cancers. To answer your question, ‘yes these are carcinogenic chemicals that should not be allowed to be disposed off indiscriminately,” the chemical expert added.

    The lawmaker representing Warri Federal Constituency in the House of Assembly, Mr Daniel Reyenieju, called for proper analysis of samples from the site. Reyenieju’s motion for the investigation of the incident was being debating at the House when this report was being written.

    He told The Nation on Sunday: “I don’t want to be sentimental about it. The sludge is not well treated and my position is that it must be well treated. It must not be allowed to start poisoning people, the incident of 1988 must not be allowed to reoccur.”

    Speaking in the same vein, the Secretary of the Itsekiri Leaders of Thought, Mr Amorighoye Mene, called for the investigation and prosecution of the management of the company, if they are found guilty. “This is not an allegation that cannot be swept under the carpet.”

    “It must be investigated and if found guilty should be punished to serve as deterrent to anybody who puts profit above health of human beings. To allow such things to continue will be to encourage illegality.

    “We are mindful of health implications and encouraging other people to engage in such practices. Whatever claim he is making on ecological fund, is of no consequence. We don’t care about the politics, what we care about is the well being of the people in that community,” Mene added.

    Response to stakeholders’ concerns and newsmen inquiries from Ebenco has so far been limited to the scanty advert of Friday, February 24, which attacked The Nation’s report and made its own allegations and castigations.

    In a veiled swipe at the IEHRG, the statement described its outcry as “deliberate ploy and plot for the writers to use Ebenco Global Services as a bait to apply for cleanup and/remediation job from the Ecological Funds, Federal Ministry of Environment.”

    In a swift response, Mr Brown Dibofun, an environmental consultant, said Ebenco advertorial smirks of ignorance and lack of knowledge of the working of the ministry and agencies.

    “First, the Ecological Fund does not award contract for private pollution; the law is that the pollutant (Ebenco in this circumstance) is responsible for cleanup and remediation of polluted site. Therefore, the idea of looking for contract does not rise and merely shows how uneducated they are,” Dibofun added.

    He lambasted the company for trying to intimidate those who are genuinely concerned about the impact of those who care about the environment that it is allegedly destroying.

    Developing cold feet

    Speaking in the same vein, a source in the community who spoke on condition of anonymity said Ebenezer’s boasted support in the community was not as altruistic as it seemed. “Some people are doing it for their selfish interests; others have people who benefit from the company and so are unwilling to speak up against what could be harmful to the environment.”

    There were also concerns that those worried about the waste, are afraid to speak out because of backlash from beneficiaries. An elderly resident suddenly backed out of a planned interview with our reporter after he was cautioned. He had earlier said he would open up on how fume and black soot from Ebenco was suffocating residents at night and making life unbearable for them.

    Nevertheless, the Federal Ministry of Environment and its counterpart in the state have ordered investigations into the incident. Commissioner of Environment, Mr Victor Nani, who led a team to the site, said the visit was to collect “samples of the waste for further laboratory analysis”, adding that the result would be made available to the public.

    It was also gathered that NOSDRA and NESREA had also taken samples for laboratory analysis, but the results might take weeks before they would be released.

    Despite the flurry of activities, the company has continued with its activities. Specifically, before Nani’s visit this week, there had been complaints that the slurry and sludge waste were still being earthed. Photographs taken by our reporter and others by individuals shortly before the verification confirmed this, raising fears that the company was trying to obliterate and cover its ‘toxic’ track.

    IEHRG claimed that over 100 tipper loads of sharp and laterite sands were deployed to the facilities between when the story of the waste dumping was first reported and when environmental agencies official started arriving in the town to obtain samples from site.

    Nevertheless, Dr Iwegbue warned that the use of sandfill by the company to bury the waste is very unsafe and cannot guarantee that the toxic materials won’t pollute sources of water. “Wastes emanating from petroleum, hydrocarbon activities are established carcinogens.”

    “The oil companies usually generate their own power and it is possible that they have transformers and compressors, which wastes are very dangerous. So when they are burying them in places that are waterlogged the implication is that it will contaminate surface and underground waters and pose severe danger for inhabitants”

    He said the use of land fill is only effective when properly done, stressing that the linings of surrounding walls must be between seven and 10 feet in thickness so that the wastes cannot seep out, adding, “even at that, there should be constant monitoring.”

    Meanwhile, Mr Ede has expressed concern about alleged “huge spending by and desperate cover up attempts by the company”. He urged federal and state governments to take up “responsibility to the people of Koko.”

    “The irony of the matter is that some Koko community leaders and residents are aiding and abetting and supporting Ebenco in the cover up of the criminal dumping because they are on the payroll of the company and its backer.”

    He lamented that the company’s facility had not been sealed up by the relevant government agencies and expressed concern that the alleged cover-up plot could extend to officials of these agencies.

    “The company has tipped tons and tons of sand and laterite on the dumpsite and used bulldozers to grind the waste to the ground. The intention is to create an impression that no toxic waste dump because the pit has been covered with sand,” Dibofun added.

    Amidst the dogfight over the waste, the silence of some elected officials at the various level, except Reyenieju, who has been speaking out, is a source of anguish for some residents.

    “We have a local government chairman, who has taken his stand with the company, we also have a member in the House of Assembly and councillors and others, why is nobody speaking out?” Abiodun, a Lagos-based Koko indigene lamented.

  • Ondo governorship poll of controversies

    Ondo governorship poll of controversies

    IN their response to allegations of orchestrated fiddling with delegates’ votes during the All Progressives Congress (APC) primary election, leaders of the party simply brushed off protests by three aspirants whom they said did not do enough to substantiate their complaints. The three — Olusegun Abraham, Ajayi Boroffice and Olusola Oke — felt so aggrieved that they distanced themselves from subsequent party activities. The party’s preferred candidate, Rotimi Akeredolu, who is also believed to be a sort of lightning rod for a budding faction of the party based in Abuja, has felt so confident about victory in the November 26 poll that he has carried on regardless of the feelings of the aggrieved troika. Yet, the troika commands such a large following in the state that it is near impossible for candidate Akeredolu, a lawyer and senior advocate, to win without their support.
    But whether Mr Akeredolu would win or not, it is chastening that the APC has not felt the need to discharge the burden of justice evoked by the primary election, let alone convince the three aggrieved aspirants that they had legitimate concerns about the motives of the party in skewing the primary in one person’s favour. Mr Akeredolu’s backers felt so emboldened that they even organised a photo opportunity for their candidate with the president sometime last week. Could that translate into victory? It is doubtful, for the only man really scouring one rural community and town after another is Mr Oke, who is also a lawyer and grassroots politician. He is candidate of the Alliance for Democracy (AD) to which he defected.
    The two Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) factional candidates, Jimoh Ibrahim from the Ali Modu Sheriff faction and Eyitayo Jegede of the Ahmed Makarfi faction, are embroiled in a bitter struggle to get the Independent National Electoral Commission’s final approval. The governor, Olusegun Mimiko, is with Mr Jegede. Consequently, the two disputants’ campaigns have been constrained by the court cases hanging on their necks. With Mr Akeredolu not really a dyed-in-the-wool politician, and Messrs Jegede and Ibrahim playing cat and mouse, it has left the field and the whole excitement to Mr Oke. Should he secure the tacit support of both Messrs Boroffice and Abraham, it could make him the man to beat on the 26th. That is of course assuming that the pusillanimous INEC can manage to conclude the election and ensure fidelity to electoral principles and procedures.
    What is, however, most important in the Ondo poll is the confusion plaguing the APC. Not only has the party’s leadership in Abuja been hijacked by forces which also betrayed Kogi State in the last governorship election, it is now also clear that the party is engaged in an internal struggle to demystify one of their own in a campaign that makes party leaders subordinate party principles to private and selfish goals. If this is not terrible enough, then consider that the party, by disavowing internal justice, is also showing that its mantra has nothing to do with the great and lofty philosophies it has propagated since 2013, but the practical and grasping philosophy of intrigues and subversion to secure personal advantage.
    This column usually endorses a candidate for important elections irrespective of their outcomes. It has decided to endorse Mr Oke, whether he wins or loses. The reason is that right from the inception of this column, it has never sided with injustice, especially one so flagrant and insulting as the one that produced Mr Akeredolu. Should Messrs Boroffice and Abraham decide to bury the hatchet to ensure APC victory, this column will still gladly side with Mr Oke to underscore the point that yielding an inch to unfairness, not to talk of one triggered by a determination to punish or outwit a faction of the party’s leadership, is embarking on a dangerous misadventure whose consequences cannot be gauged. But why not Mr Ibrahim or Mr Jegede? Mr Ibrahim is a spoiler in the mould of Donald Trump of the U.S. He stands grandly and obtrusively for nothing. And Mr Jegede, despite his geniality and sophistication, is a stooge of Dr Mimiko, the obtuse thinker and non-performing governor whose tainted support is a negation of the little political morality his protégé claims to possess and represent.

  • Constitution amendment of controversies

    Previous attempts by the National Assembly to rejig the 1999 Constitution have all failed to yield the desired result because of the injection of self-serving clauses. Assistant Editor ONYEDI OJIABOR writes that a similar fate awaits the ongoing effort by the Eighth Assembly owing to the inclusion of life pension and immunity clauses for principal officers. 

    LIKE the Sixth and the Seventh Senate, the upper chamber of the National Assembly has kicked off the process of amending the 1999 Constitution. It began a Constitution Review Retreat on June 10 in Lagos.

    The retreat began two days after members marked the one year anniversary of the Eight Senate with an appraisal of their landmarks, at the end of which they scored the upper chamber above average.

    But, if the Senate Committee on Constitution Review had anticipated the barrage of attacks now trailing certain items in proposed amendment, it probably would not have listed them for consideration.

    Two of the proposed amendment that provoked outrage and indignation are: the move to create life pension for presiding officers of the National Assembly and State Houses of Assembly and the bid to fashion immunity clause for the same presiding officers.

    The upper chamber had also attracted unsavory comments from Nigerians for declaring during its one year anniversary that it passed 11 bills in one year.

    In their appraisal, Senate Leader Mohammed Ali Ndume and Senate Committee on Rules and Business Chairman Babajide Omoworare said 300 bills, including four from the Executive, were introduced between June 9, last year and June 9 this year. They said the remaining bills were members’.

    According to them, out of the 300 bills, 186 were at the first reading stage and 54 had gone through second reading and referred to the relevant committees.

    Several other bills, it was learnt, are awaiting publication in the journal while three others were withdrawn for representation by sponsors and one was negative.

    The Senate Leader specifically listed what it described as ‘96 landmark resolutions’ adopted by the upper chamber and that it received 159 petitions.

    Some of the bills already passed include: Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Repeal and re-enactment) 2015; National Centre for Cancer and Treatment 2015; Electronic Transaction Bill  2015; Appropriation Act (Amendment) Bill 2015; Supplementary Appropriation Bill 2015; Federal Capital Territory Statutory Appropriation Act (Amendment) Bill 2016; High Court of the Federal Capital Territory Abuja (Amendment) Bill 2015; Appropriation Bill 2015; Commercial Agriculture Bill, 2016, Environmental Health Officers (registration) Act 2002 (Amendment) Bill 2016 and Nigeria Institute of Soil Science Bill 2016.

    Apart from 2015 Appropriation Act (Amendment) Bill; Supplementary Appropriation Bill 2015; Federal Capital Territory Statutory Appropriation Act (Amendment) Bill 2016 and the 2016 Appropriation Bill 2015 which are statutory executive bills, observers ask the impact and relevance of the bills listed by the Senate on Nigeria’s deplorable socio-economic condition.

    To some analysts, it may not be just enough to roll out bills and motions. What should be important to the Senate, they argue, is the quality and capacity of the bills to uplift Nigerians living standard.

    Content analysis of the passed bills, observers say, does not show much to cheer about. Besides, they say the bills have no concurrence of the House of Representatives yet.

    Prior to the fresh controversy generated by the life pension and immunity clause proposals, the Senate had in the past one year been thrown into in one controversy or the other every week.

    Only recently, the upper chamber was enmeshed in self-inflicted bashing over its attempt to outlaw free speech by enacting an Anti-Social Media Law.

    Not a few Nigerians took the move as a ploy to criminalise free speech in the country.

    Sponsored by Deputy Senate Leader Bala Ibn Na’Allah, the Anti-Social Media Bill sought, among others, to prohibit what Na’Allah classified as ‘frivolous petitions.’ He did not state could pass for a frivolous petition and he was not explicit on who will determine it. The bill was seen as offensive and carpeted as self-serving.

    The Senate was forced to swallow the bitter pill and withdraw the bill following concerted efforts of Ministry of Justice officials and widespread condemnation from the human rights community.

    Those who condemned the bill saw it as a calculated attempt by the lawmakers to shield and protect themselves from public scrutiny. The Nation however learnt that the sponsored of the bill might have lost the first bout, but marked the spot to fight another day.

    Insiders say plans are afoot to rework the bill and represent it for consideration like Senator Biodun Olujimi’s Gender Equality Bill that was reintroduced last week. The bill was shot down shortly after it was introduced.

    Another move made by the Senate that stirred the hornets’ nest was its attempt to amend the Code of Conduct Bureau Act and Code of Conduct Tribunal Law at a time its presiding officer, Senate President Abubakar Bukola Saraki is facing charges of alleged false declaration of asset at the CCT.

    The proposal, sponsored by Senator Peter Nwaoboshi was not only ill-timed, but described by Nigerians, who smelt a rat, as one made in bad faith.

    Questions were asked about the motive of the amendment, especially at a time the Senate President has an issue to clear with the CCT. Nigerians rose against the Senate over the proposed amendment.

    The lawmakers, though initially unyielding, were eventually forced to drop the bill when it became obvious that it was a pill they could not force down the throat of Nigerians.

    However, in the lower chamber, the House of Representatives curiously initiated and passed another version of the same bill. Though the move was seen as an affront on Nigerians, the representatives went ahead with the legislation.

    A source, who said the House has been working assiduously to refer the bill to the Senate for concurrence, told The Nation that its passage in the upper chamber might be a fait accompli going by the frosty relationship between the executive and legislative arms.

    According to the source, the two chambers may go a step further to override the President’s veto should the President withhold his assent 30 days after getting a clean copy of the bill.

    Some prominent Nigerians have come out hard of the National Assembly over the proposed life pension and immunity for presiding officers at the national and state levels.

    They include the chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption, Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN), who urged President Muhammadu Buhari to disregard any bill from the National Assembly on life pension and immunity for its principal officers.

    Describing the proposal as outrageous and annoying, the Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) wondered if the Senate had not become an institution where members only seek the promotion of individual interests.

    He asked the rationale behind life pension for principal officers, who are lawmakers earning monthly salaries.

    His words: “Saraki is a former governor. Is he not earning pension in Kwara already? The proposal is annoying, immoral and outrageous; it is the height of insensitivity. These demands show that they don’t fear Nigerians.

    “Those pushing for the demands should have asked how the public would react before presenting the demands. I will ask the President to totally disregard the bill. The President should veto such bill if it ever gets to his desk.”

    On proposed immunity for the principal officers, Prof Sagay said seeking immunity was tantamount to planning for a crime and demanding immunity in advance to cover it up.

    He said: “Many are still questioning the immunity granted to the President and the governors and then some are proposing immunity for senators. Should all Nigerians be asking for immunity then? I am so shocked that some could be dreaming of such outrageous and annoying idea, it is nonsensical.”

    Also condemning the proposals, the President and Acting Secretary-General of the Trade Union Congress (TUC), Bala Kaigama and Simeso Amachree, described the lawmakers’ demand as shocking, especially with the prevailing economic situation.

    In a statement, the duo of Kaigama and Amachree said: “The Trade Union Congress condemns and describes as unfortunate the proposed life pension for presiding officers of the National Assembly after their tenure in office, even at a time the economy has collapsed and brought about massive job losses and unprecedented poverty.”

    In his reaction, Senator Shehu Sani (Kaduna Central) kicked against the clause which covered life pension for principal federal lawmakers as well as immunity for public office-holders in the proposed amendments.

    Sani, who is the Chairman, Senate Committee on Foreign & Domestic Debts, said: “I am personally opposed to life pension for legislators, governors or their deputies or immunity for public office-holders.”

     

    Sailing against the tide

    Observers argue that common sense should have informed the Senators that the mood of the country, including declining economic fortunes and anti-graft crusade, would work against the proposals.

    Although the life pension clause was adopted in the aborted Fourth Constitution (alteration) Bill, which former President Goodluck Jonathan declined to sign into law, observers say promoters of the proposal should have been better informed by the change mantra of the Buhari administration.

    The same consideration applies to the immunity for presiding officers’ bill. The classification of the two proposals as ‘self-serving and a mark of insensitivity’ may be understandable.

    The massive onslaught against the proposals may also be comprehensible considering the disposition and yearning of most Nigerians for accountability.

    The dwindling economic fortune that has incapacitated no fewer than 27 out of the 36 states from paying workers their monthly salaries, may have also given fillip to the anger against the push for life pension for a category of public officers already perceived as enjoying disproportionate entitlements.

    Already, some rights activists have threatened to rally Nigerians to shoot down the proposals.

    Activist lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana, who described the proposals as “insensitive, irrational and immoral”, said the move depicted high level of insensitivity on the part of the legislators.

     Falana said: “The proposals for immunity and life pension for the principal officers of the National Assembly are insensitive, irrational and immoral.

    “Indeed, it is the height of insensitivity for legislators to propose life pension for their leaders at a time that workers are owed arrears of salaries in many states of the federation.

    “The proposal to confer immunity on legislators is provocative, to say the least. No serious nation can grant immunity to legislators who have been linked with criminal diversion of public funds, forgery and rape.

    “We can assure the concerned members of the public that the satanic proposals of the legislators will not succeed. It is pertinent to inform the legislators that the members of the human rights community have resolved to mobilise the Nigerian people to reject both proposals”.

    There were reports that the two controversial proposals pit senators against one another at the Lagos retreat. The intervention of Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu before a vote on life pension proposal was taken confirmed this.

    Ekweremadu, who the Chairman of the Constitution Review Committee said: “This has nothing to do with an individual. It is about the institution. Let us not politicise it. Nobody elected the Chief Justice of Nigeria, but he enjoys pension. But if we cheapen our own institution, so be it. Let us not make this a personal thing.”

    But Senate leader, Mohammed Ali Ndume, did not see any merit in the proposal.

    Ndume said: “The case of the state governors and their deputies is different. They were elected by the public. But we elected our principal officers. To me, I believe that the benefit of the office of the Senate President and other principal officers is too much. They are just one among equals.

    “I am against any excessive privileges given to the Senate President or the Speaker. All of us were elected. If we are doing anything, it should be for all members of the National Assembly.”

    The Senator representing Kebbi South, Senator Bala Na’Allah, who spoke in favour of the proposal said: “Nigeria operates three arms of government. They are supposed to be independent. The Chief Justice of Nigeria takes pension and gratuity when he retires. He gets a house too. This is a serious matter. All Justices of the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court get gratuity.

    “Are we saying we should exclude ourselves as an arm of the government? They are institutions created by the government. The Senate president and other presiding officers should benefit.”

    Through a voice vote, 22 supported while 13 voted against the proposal. Some others abstained.

    Displeased with the outcome of the voting, Senate Minority Leader Godswill Akpabio said: “If you ask me to vote to have life pension for principal officers, I will say yes. The governor of a state and the president cannot stay in office for more than two terms. But for a Senator, he can stay in office for 35 years.”

     The former Akwa Ibom governor cited the case of former Senate President, David Mark as an instance.

    He said: “Are we saying that David Mark for example will receive life pension while serving as a senator now that he is no longer a presiding officer?”

    The immunity clause for presiding officers of the National Assembly and State Houses of Assembly has also been roundly criticised for its obvious limitations, especially at a time the country is battling with unbridled corruption in public affairs.

    The committee adopted is subject to approval by the two chambers of the National Assembly and ratification by at least 24 state Houses of Assembly.

    A total of 21 senators voted in favour while 15 voted against. The argument of the backers of the proposal was that because the executive and judiciary enjoy immunity, it should be extended to the legislature.

    On the push for immunity for presiding officers, the Senator representing Kano South, Kabiru Gaya, said the essence of immunity is to protect some public office holders against distractions while discharging their duties.

    Gaya said: “There are three tiers of government and only two arms enjoy immunity. See what is happening to the President of the Senate now. We are not saying the case in court should be stopped.

    “We have even read that there is a fresh case of forgery of Senate Standing Rule against the presiding officers and some other persons, all is to distabilise us.”

    Senator Ndume supported, but sought that immunity should be limited to civil offences.

    To him, “for criminal issues, there should not be immunity but for civil offences there should be immunity. Whoever is involved in a criminal matter should be prosecuted.’’

    Akpabio sought the extension immunity to all federal and state lawmakers.

    He contended that elected officers saddled with the responsibility of ensuring good governance should be allowed to carry out their functions without any form of interference.

    The Minority Leader said: “I propose that all principal officers of the state house of assembly, House of Representatives and Senate should enjoy immunity like the executive. All parliamentarians who have criminal cases can be invested but they should serve their punishment after office.”

    Na’Allah, however, drew the attention of the committee that Nigerians might misconstrue the proposal for immunity for the legislature to mean that they are arrogating so much power to themselves.

    He suggested total removal of immunity from all arms of government to ensure balance.

    He said: “If you give immunity to everybody, a legislator may rape lady and wait to finish his tenure before being prosecuted because he has immunity.”

    The major problem with the immunity clause as proposed is that if granted, it is likely to breed uncontrollable impunity, some say.

    The controversial National Grazing Reserve Agency Bill pending in the House of Representatives has finally berthed in Senate.

    Another bill likely to provoke controversy, the National Ranches Commission Bill, was also introduced in the Senate the same day.

    Senator Rabiu Kwankwaso (Kano Central) was listed as the promoter in-chief of the National Grazing Reserve Agency Bill entitled “National Grazing Reserves Agency (establishment etc) Bill 2016 (SB.292.”

    On the other hand, Senator Barnabas Gemade (Benue North East) sponsored the National Ranches Commission (establishment etc) Bill 2016 (SB 293). Both bills passed the mandatory first reading.

    Na’Allah (Kebbi South), who read the bills said: “Do we take it that the bills have passed second reading? The Senate chamber erupted with a deafening “No, not at all.”

    The National Grazing Reserve Agency Bill pending in the lower chamber has been criticised as a ploy by the Federal Government to grab and seize land from their original owners to be given to cattle herders.

    The National Grazing Reserve Agency Bill has variously been described as dead on arrival by mostly southern Senators.

    The same Bill sponsored by Senator Zanaib Kure from Niger State failed to fly in the sixth Senate when it was defeated before it could pass second reading.

    At a recent public hearing in the Senate on the clashes between farmers and herdsmen, the federal government, represented by Minister of State for Agriculture, Senator Heineken Lokpobiri, canvassed for the establishment of ranches.

    The leaders of the herdsmen, under the aegis of Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria stoutly opposed the establishment of ranches.

    They rather insisted on creation of grazing reserves in parts of the country as the only solution to farmers and herdsmen clashes. It is not in doubt that the two Bills would stimulate national interest.

  • Budget controversies

    •We welcome government’s promised probe of the national embarrassment

    Bewildering. That best captures the many twists and turns that have attended the 2016 Budget of the Federal Government. As it stands, everything about the budget – with the exception of the rite of its presentation on December 22, 2015 – has been dogged with controversy.

    It started when, hours to the kick-off of the debates on the general principles, the document, presented in the full glare of global media, was sensationally declared missing. It took the letter written by President Muhammadu Buhari on January 19, to the National Assembly informing the lawmakers of the errors in the proposal earlier sent to them for the matter to be resolved, but this after nearly a week of recriminations on both sides.

    If Nigerians had thought that the fog surrounding the budget had cleared, the nation would again learn that even the corrected version had also been allegedly doctored by the bureaucracy. A week into the budget defence, virtually all the ministers that have appeared before the Joint Committees of the National Assembly have practically disowned the votes allocated to their ministries.

    Earlier, the Senate was reported to have discovered a sum of N10 billion smuggled into the budget of the Ministry of Education for an allegedly questionable subhead. Days after, health minister, Professor Isaac Adewole, would kick off another fire-storm when he told shocked members of the Senate Committee on Health that the proposal drawn up and submitted by his ministry to the budget office had been doctored by “budget rats”. For the Minister of Information and Culture, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, it was the matter of “strange” provision of N230 million and N168 million for the purchase of computers for the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) and the Film and Video Censors Board, respectively.

    For a budget which should ordinarily be the main anchor of the Buhari administration’s promise of change, it is unfortunate that the nation has found itself in an embarrassing situation where the integrity of the process has become the issue. As it is, there is no doubt that a lot went wrong in the process. Nigerians not only deserve to know, they are entitled to understand what went wrong. What is unacceptable is the finger-pointing by the ministers even when their lapses as a collective, are more than apparent. We consider their current posturing as unhelpful to the process of unravelling the mystery, and the attempt to tag a section of the bureaucracy with the label of criminality even without proof as opportunistic.

    We say this mindful of the fact that the bureaucracy actually did the bulk of the preliminary work on the controversial budget. Nigerians may recall that the ministers, sworn in on November 11, 2015 had six weeks to work with the civil servants on its final shape before it was presented. Would that explain some of the wide discrepancies that later emerged? Is it a case of the ministers themselves not sufficiently painstaking in view of the relatively short time they had to peruse the estimates?

    Secondly, our understanding is that the zero-based budgeting approach adopted by the Buhari administration is substantially new to the civil servants, most of whom had operated on the old ‘cut and paste’ envelop system. Could this also be a factor in some of the issues now coming to the fore?

    Far from providing alibis for the widespread padding and inflation of the budget as alleged, we find it necessary to raise these posers if only to underscore the danger of making generalisations without the benefit of thorough investigations.

    We therefore welcome the investigations as proposed by the Federal Government. They should be thorough and open. Indeed, our desire is to see those guilty of the alleged infractions punished strictly in accordance with the provisions of the law. In the end, it is important that the budget both reflects the exigencies and priorities of the current time, to ensure that the nation gets to have commensurate value for every kobo of public funds spent.

  • Controversies trail resignation of Wike’s media adviser

    • Former governor’s aide on way to USA   •SA’s action demonstration of uncommon courage- APC

    Yesterday’s resignation of the Rivers State Governor, Chief Nyesom Wike’s embattled Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Opunabo Inko-Tariah, has continued to generate fresh controversies.

    According to investigations in Port Harcourt, Opunabo Inko-Tariah was on his way to the United States of America, as at the time his resignation was made public, making his telephone lines inaccessible for further clarifications.

    It was learnt that Inko-Tariah dropped the three-page resignation letter through a trusted senior journalist around 9 p.m. on Thursday, pleading that it must not be made public until 9 a.m. yesterday, when he would have been airborne to the USA.

    Meanwhile, the Rivers State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC), through its Publicity Secretary, Chris Finebone, lauded Inko-Tariah’s courage, describing it as uncommon.

    Rivers APC said: “We welcome the uncommon courage displayed by Mr. Opunabo Inko-Tariah in resigning as the Special Adviser, Media and Publicity to the embattled governor of Rivers State this (yesterday) morning.

    “As a party, the APC knew that it was only a matter of time before all well-meaning proud sons and daughters of Rivers State, who find themselves in Wike’s sinking ship jumped to safety. This is not only because his governorship will soon become history, but because the malevolently unique style of Wike, whose hallmark behaviour hinges on divide-and-rule exasperates decent minds.

    “We are not surprised that the former Special Adviser, Media & Publicity is telling sordid stories of neglect and disrespect for his views and advice by the outgoing governor. These are all well-known character pattern of Nyesom Wike.”

    It was also gathered that the embattled former special adviser was to be sacked yesterday morning by the Governor Wike for embarrassing him and the Rivers government over his accusation of the election petitions tribunals and the Supreme Court of judicial terrorism and gang-up.

    Inko-Tariah, who is also the publisher of Port Harcourt-based newspaper, Hard Truth, claimed in his resignation that he resigned because Wike starved his office of funds and refused to take his professional advice.

    According to sources, Wike made up his mind on October 27 to remove Inko-Tariah shortly after he issued a press statement, titled: “Judicial Terrorism,” where he thoroughly abused the judiciary and eminent judicial officers.

    It was gathered that the judicial terrorism statement angered the governor, himself a lawyer, making him decide to sideline the controversial Inko-Tariah to avoid further embarrassment.

    The Rivers governor, while meeting with stakeholders at the Banquet Hall of Government House, Port Harcourt on October 30, disowned Inko-Tariah and denied ever authorising the controversial statement.