Tag: Controversy

  • Controversy over status of General Aviation Terminal

    Controversy over status of General Aviation Terminal

    The aviation sector is set for yet another round of controversy as the Federal Government today inaugurates the remodelled General Aviation Terminal (GAT) in the old domestic wing of the Murtala Muhammed Airport (MMA), Ikeja, Lagos raising fresh concerns over the control of the terminal in the concession agreement the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) signed with Bi- Courtney Aviation Services Limited, managers of the MMA 2, Ikeja, Lagos.

    Stakeholders in the sector including Mr. Olu Ohunayo, Head of Research, Zenith Travels, who spoke on the development, explained that until issues bordering on the clarity of public private partnerships are clear in Nigeria, it will be difficult to attract the right investors.

    He said it is time government sorted out the issues concerning any vexed agreement or it’s content, so that the industry could be put on a sound footing for airlines to thrive.

    Another expert, an airline operator, who pleaded not to be named, said the taking over of the General Aviation Terminal by the government through remodelling, expansion and ultimate completion will be a great disservice to the spirit of public private partnership in Nigeria.

    He said his position is predicated on the shabby implantation of the concession agreement between government and the Bi-Courtney Aviation Services Limited, as it affects their concession of the domestic terminals of the Lagos Airport.

    The airline operator expressed concerns over the disregard of court orders by the government and its agents on the issue, which gave right to the concessionaire to manage both terminals.

    Another industry player, who declined to give his name, described the take over of the old domestic terminal from the concessionaire as an evidence of power play, as it would put the concessionaire of the new terminal, MMA2, in a tight position to recover its investment before handing over the facility to the government, even as the tenure of the concession is still in dispute.

    There is, however, anxiety that some of the existing domestic carriers may want to relocate to the remodelled General Aviation Terminal.

    The Minister of Aviation, Princess Stella Oduah, said yesterday that the General Aviation Terminal does not belong to Bi-Courtney Aviation Services Limited.

    Speaking through her media assistant, Mr. Joe Obi, the minister said: “Information at our disposal indicates that Bi-Courtney Aviation Services Ltd, the Concessionaire to MM2, is apparently threatened by the imminent opening of the newly-reconstructed and remodelled GAT, Lagos.

    “To be sure, the area where GAT is located has never been part of the area concessioned to Bi-Courtney Ltd. The agreement with Bi-courtney has a survey plan clearly marked in square metres and the area of the GAT was never contemplated to be part of the area leased to Bi-Courtney.

    “Nigerians can recall the dilapidated and decrepit state of the nation’s airports, including GAT, prior to the assumption of office of the current minister. Today, 11 airports, including the GAT, are an elegant testimony of the desire and determination of the minister to give Nigerians what they truly deserve-airports of their dreams that compare to any such facility anywhere in the world.

    “It is inconceivable that anyone would not only contemplate, but also hold fast to the jaundiced belief that a nation as big and great as Nigeria ought not to progress beyond having a terminal like MM2.”

    Oduah further said: “Regarding allegations that there are subsisting court orders restraining anybody, including FAAN, which is the landlord of all federal airports in Nigeria from further development of the GAT, we need to stress that the cases are still ongoing. In fact, our case is before the Supreme Court, challenging the orders being referred to mainly, but not limited to the fact that in several of these cases, FAAN, as a principal interested party, was never fully represented.

  • Achebe’s war memoir stirs controversy

    Achebe’s war memoir stirs controversy

    HE is a professor of English, a writer of repute and runs regular commentary on socio-political development of the country. Twice, he has been nominated to receive national honours, and twice, he turned down the offer. His books have always generated furore. When he published A man of the people just before the military coup of January 1966, it received critical review by a section of the public.

    His latest work, due to be released in Nigeria soon, is a chronicle of the activities of the civil war. The publishers, Penguins, described it thus: “Now, years, in the making, comes the towering reckoning with one of the modern Africa’s most fateful experience, both as he lived it and he has now come to understand it.

    Like or dislike him, Achebe cannot be ignored Things Fall Apart, his first book, has been variously rated as one of the 50 most influential books. He has also been described as one of the most influential Africans in the 21st Century.

    Achebe, who was cultural ambassador for Biafra during the war, displayed deep-seated dislike for the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo and his people, the Yoruba.

    Dismissing the argument that the Federal Government, involved in a war, had to do what it did to facilitate its victory, the writer said: “Supporters of the Federal Government position maintain that a war was being waged and the premise of all wars is for one side to emerge as the victor. Overly ambitious actors may have taken actions unbecoming of international conventions of human rights, but these things happen everywhere. This same group often cites findings, from organisations (sanctioned by the Federal Government) that sent observers during the crisis, that there was no clear intent on behalf of the Nigerian troops to wipe out the Igbo people … pointing out that over 30,000 Igbo still lived in Lagos, and half a million in the Mid-West.”But if the diabolical disregard for human life seen during the war was not due to the Northern military elite’s jihadist or genocidal obsession, then why were there more small arms used on Biafran soil than during the entire second world war? Why were there 100,000 casualties on the much larger Nigerian side compared with more than two million ‘mainly children’ Biafrans killed?”

    He maintained that the pre-and post-war policies of the government were calculated to wipe out Ndigbo, Achebe said the same policy has kept his people out of the mainstream of the political configuration of the country 42 years after the war. This did not take into consideration that an Igbo, Dr. Alex Ekwueme, was Vice-President in the Second Republic. When there was a consensus that power had to shift to the South in 1999, Ekwueme slugged it out with Chief Olusegun Obasanjo for the ticket of the dominant political party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). However, given the prevailing mood in the country, the Yoruba had to be compensated for the annulment of the presidential election of 1993 won by the late Chief Moshood Abiola. The sentiments swayed victory for Obasanjo at the Jos National Convention. While Obasanjo, a Yoruba, won, Ekwueme, an Igbo, had a good run and could not be said to have been disgraced. Since then, he has been handed crucial assignments by the party since he was the pioneer Chairman of the PDP’s Board of Trustees.

    A political activist and convener of the Coalition of Democrats for Electoral Reforms (CODER), Mr. Ayo Opadokun, took umbrage at the position of Achebe in the new book. He said: “The new write-up is another rehash of the perverted intellectual laziness which he had exhibited in the past in matters relating to Awo when Achebe described Awo as a Yoruba irredentist. What he expected was that Awo should fold his arms to allow the Igbo race led by Zik to preside over the affairs of the Yoruba nation. The fact that the Yoruba people in their wisdom, having found out that the NCNC through Zik and Okpara had established a government of their choice and then wanted to follow up with the appropriation of the Yorubaland as their catchment area. It is a demonstration of the contempt of Achebe and his ilk for the Yoruba nation.

    He said: “The story of the emergence of Nigeria as a country as christened by the concubine of Lugard can’t be written sensibly without admitting one or two areas of flaws where founding leaders were not disposed to making a nation out of Nigeria.

    The NCNC led by Zik and his people, in a terrific conspicuous collaboration, after having put Awo in jail, forced the creation of Midwest and the NCNC refused to allow the creation of another in their region. Perhaps the West had the smallest landmass of the three regions.

    “Secondly, in the run-up and activities towards Nigerian nationalism, it was clear that the East and West were in contest for socio-economic and political power. The fact is that with what the NCNC, driven by Igbo nationalism to which Achebe subscribes, the Yoruba nation was being derided by the likes of Achebe who wanted to forcefully appropriate Yoruba territory. And because the Yoruba nation led by Awo would not accept that, they became enemies.

    The political problem with the Igbo

    stemmed from the ban on import

    of stockfish and second hand clothing after the war. He felt that it was fundamental error for a group of Nigerians to live on stockfish that lacks nutritional value and that it was degrading for Nigeria to be importing second-hand clothing. Being an economist, a honest and forthright Nigerian who would not mortgage his conscience to win votes, he had to carry that cross all his life. Even after his death, Prof Achebe has written a new book, repeating the gaffe. It is another demonstration of how far inveterate enemies can go.

    “I cannot believe that a scholar of Achebe’s stature could be so unforgiving. Mathew 6: 14 and 15 enjoins every Christian to forgive fellow human beings.

    “Some have been trying to build a bridge between Igbo and Yoruba. I remember my colleagues like Rear Admiral Ndubuisi Kanu (Retd), a former governor of Lagos and Imo; Commodore Ebitu Ukiwe, a former Chief of General Staff who headed the Council for Understanding and Unity; Dr. Arthur Nwankwo; Alhaji Abdulaziz Ude and so many of them who are men of honour. Their efforts have not been devalued by the attitudes of people like Prof Achebe. Their efforts and ours led to the formation of CUU. It became so powerful that Dodan Barracks had to proscribe the organisation.

    “Let our Igbo brothers be reminded that about three quarters of their assets not in the Eastern region are in Lagos. We have been very liberal and accommodating and have allowed them to live undisturbed. When there was civil war, it was only in Yoruba land that the estate of the Igbo was returned with the rent. Let no one think that the Yoruba were fools by being so accommodating.”

    Chairman of the Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG), Wale Oshun wondered why some Igbo, especially Chinua Achebe “find it convenient to pick Awolowo as a scapegoat of all that happened to them during the war.”

    He asked, “did awo start the war? He was just the Federal Commissioner for Finance with responsibility for coming up with appropriate fiscal and monetary policies. He was not at the battle field and could not therefore be fairly charged with genocide..”

    The former Chief Whip of the House of Representatives also challenged anyone to come up with any publication where Awo said starvation should be regarded as a legitimate weapon of war. “Neither in any of the books written by him nor on him was any such thing said. It is the work of those who hated his guts. It is not factual. It must be remembered that even when he was not in the cabinet, he tried to prevent the war, but as soon as it broke out, it was between Nigeria and Biafra. He had to come up with policies that would end the war quickly. Those who are peddling this line have forgotten that Awo was in prison when the crisis started.”

    Reacting to the suggestion that Awo was one of those who supplied the intellectual power that drove the policies that eventually and effectively ended the war, Oshun said, “if he was in Nigeria and Nigeria was fighting a war, was he supposed to supply intellectual power to Ojukwu? I regard it as a mere emotional statement.”

    Oshun also found no merit in the contention that the late Leader of the Yoruba wanted power at all cost and saw the war as an opportunity to further that ambition.. He said: “If Awo wanted power, he would have stayed on in the cabinet after the war. But, rather, he left, saying it had become indefensible to be part of a military government in peace time. If he was scheming for power, he would have held on and used the same military to further his ambition. So, where is the evidence he did anything to project himself and the Yoruba?”

    Awo’s official biographer, Prof Moses Makinde, who heads Awolowo Centre for Philosophy, Ideology and Good Governance, Osogbo, is the author of ‘Awo: The Last Conversation’. The other two are: ‘Awo as a Philosopher’ and ‘A Memoir of the Jewel’. He disagreed with Achebe, maintaining that the Ikenne-born statesman was a full-blooded nationalist.

    His words: “I do not agree with Prof Achebe on the statement. It is not true that Awo’s civil war role smacked of even an iota of selfish political aggrandisement. I was his biographer and I can state authoritatively that, though he did not penetrate the North, he had a firm belief in the unity of Nigeria and that was why he wanted to govern the country as an indivisible entity. All the governors and other close associates of his would attest to the fact that he was a believer in the oneness of Nigeria which was why he wanted to govern the entire country for the overall benefit of her entire citizenry.

    “He was a rare politician and a disciplinarian who believed in selfless service to his people in one whole entity called Nigeria. And that he always preached to all his lieutenants at any point in time. That, of course, accounts for why all his landmark achievements in the Western Region still speak for his patriotic and selfless inclination till today.”

    The debate continues to rage. What is not in doubt is that the fight for a better Nigeria remains the preoccupation of true nationalists and patriots

  • Controversy over administration of Imo councils

    Activities at local government councils in Imo State have grounded to a halt following the dispute between the council chairmen and the state government.

    The chairmen have continued to report in their offices although the government had mandated the newly appointed Directors of Administration and General Services (DAGS), to take over the councils.

    Civil servants have stayed away from their offices. Some of the council secretariats have been taken over by grass and rodents.

    The offices of the treasurers, DAGSs and secretaries to the local governments were locked yesterday.

    It was learnt that computers and files had been moved to unknown destinations, from where senior council officers operate.

    At Ngor Okpalla local government, some structures have been destroyed by rain.

    A junior council worker, who pleaded for anonymity, said: “We are disturbed by the ugly situation. We live in the fear of being attacked by thugs anytime we come to work.”

    Some of the embattled chairmen said they run the councils with their personal money.

    The Chairman of Ngor-Okpalla Local Government, Mr. Enyinna Onuegbu, said: “I run the council from my pocket. Since the Appeal Court granted our prayer, Governor Rochas Okorocha has refused to hold the Joint Account meeting, thereby denying the councils their allocations.”

    At Owerri North Local Government, the Chairman, Dr. Eric Ogwo, said: “The DAGS and Local Government Secretary are operating outside the council. Since we were reinstated by the Appeal Court, we have not received salary. Last Thursday, I learnt that my workers were asked to come to another local government, Owerri Municipal Council, to collect their salary.”

    The Commissioner for Local Government Affairs did not pick his calls when The Nation phoned him.

    In a statement, the governor’s media aide, Mr. Ebere Uzoukwa, said the chairmen lack the competence to discuss the JAAC meeting and the disbursement of council funds, because their tenures expired on August 8. Uzoukwa said the chairmen’s tenure elongation suit was dismissed by Justice Ngozi Opara of an Owerri High Court.

    He said: “Okorocha is running an open administration and has nothing to hide. Against the backdrop of the erroneous impression created in some quarters by some disgruntled element that activities in the 27 LGAs are being stalled, the state government states emphatically that various activities, including developmental projects, are moving on smoothly under the management of the DAGS, who are presently in charge of council activities, pending the conduct of the local government polls.”

  • Controversy trails return of schools in Abia

    Controversy has trailed the return of some public schools to the mission in Abia State.

    On September 14, the state government handed over 19 secondary schools to their original owners.

    Governor Theodore Orji, at the ceremony, said the return of schools to their original owners would be gradual.

    Orji said the certificates issued to the mission for the takeover of the schools were temporary and the government would watch how they run the schools for one year.

    Workers at the school are apprehensive of what their fate would be.

    Some teachers at the Holy Rosary Girls Secondary School in Umuahia North Local Government Area said they were afraid of losing their jobs.

    The situation is worse at Girls High School, Umueze, where the Methodist Church is insisting on an immediate and complete take-over.

    It was learnt that delegates from the church came to the school last Wednesday and told the headteacher to handover to them.

    An eyewitness said: “The headteacher told them to give her some days to prepare her handover note, but they refused. They even came with a mason, who started working on a part of the school fence that had collapsed.”

    A new signboard, which reads: “Methodist Church Nigeria School System, Methodist Girls High School”, has been mounted in front of the school.

    The headteacher, Mrs. J.E. Iroham, refused to comment on the development.

    She said: “I have already spoken to your colleague from the state radio station and will not speak again except I get clearance from my employers.”

    Commissioner for Education Mrs. Monica Phillips confirmed the incident at the school.

    She said: “We have heard of the confrontation by the Methodist Church. Such is expected and we are equal to the task. We are looking out for such problems and will tackle them as they come.

    “There is no ambiguity in the handover policy of the schools. The terms are clear. If they do not want the headteacher, let them bring whoever they want. We shall continue to pay the staff.”