Tag: CONUA

  • CONUA, SSANU, NASU to Fed Govt: give us our own deal

    CONUA, SSANU, NASU to Fed Govt: give us our own deal

    The Congress of University Academics (CONUA), Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities (SSANU), Non-Academic Staff Union of Educational and Associated Institutions (NASU) and National Association of Academic Technologists (NAAT) have urged the Federal Government to urgently conclude renegotiations with them. According to them, the Federal Government and Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) agreement is a welcome development, but it does not automatically translate to total industrial peace in the university system. Stakeholders have joined SSANU, NASU and NAAT in asserting that the government must urgently conclude renegotiations to avoid fresh unrest and sustain the current stability on campuses, Assistant Editor Bola Olajuwon writes

    Last week, the Federal Government and the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) signed and unveiled a landmark renegotiated agreement. Parents, students and other education stakeholders expressed a sigh of relief since the new deal replaced the controversial 2009 pact. It was aimed at ending nearly two decades of industrial friction in the university system.

    The Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, described the agreement as a “decisive turning point” for Nigerian education. To ASUU President, Prof. Chris Piwuna, the union remains cautious regarding the “totality” of the government’s implementation based on past experiences.

    President, National Parent Teacher Association of Nigeria (NAPTAN), Alhaji Haruna Danjuma and Public Relations Officer (PRO) of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), Adeyemi Samson Ajasa, among others, hailed the signing of the agreement.

    Danjuma, in a chat with The Nation, said: “It’s a great turning point in restoring stability, trust and quality in Nigerian tertiary education systems if Federal Government stands by the agreement, and on the other side I urge ASUU to accept the agreement now that the government has unveiled the renegotiation agreement as part of their own contributions, we therefore commend the efforts of the Minister of Education for facilitating this agreement, and we hope he will ensure total execution of the agreement.”

    Ajasa said: “I believe this new agreement will build a new stability and ensure proper funding of education, with all these previous agitations resolved. I believe it will take proper and immediate effect, whereby all parties will be satisfied.

    “This should also motivate the lecturers and staff to do their best and deliver proper education and teaching and learning to students, including proper research works.”

    SSANU, NASU announce indefinite strike’s threats

    But not surprising though, other university unions, such as Congress of University Academics (CONUA), Joint Action Committee (JAC) of the Non-Academic Staff Union of Educational and Associated Institutions (NASU) and Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities (SSANU) have threatened indefinite strikes over alleged non-completion of pending agreements with them. The other university union is the National Association of Academic Technologists (NAAT).

    SSANU and NASU have demanded that the government meet its obligations, concerning the payment of withheld four months’ salaries from 2022 and implementing agreements like the 2009 renegotiation and the N35,000 wage award.

    A statement signed by Prince Peters Adeyemi, General Secretary, NASU and Mohammed Ibrahim, President, SSANU and Chairman of JAC, said: “JAC of NASU and SSANU remains committed to the entrenchment of industrial harmony and sustainable communities in our universities, and calls on the Federal Government to ensure expedited action in the ongoing renegotiation with NASU and SSANU, as any further delay after the signing of today’s agreement with our sister union would be tantamount to a clear invitation to chaos, and the distortion of industrial peace which we have continued to maintain despite government’s continued insensitivity to the university system and the gruesome conditions under which our members are made to work.

    “JAC notes that timely conclusion of the ongoing renegotiation with NASU and SSANU would avert the breakdown of industrial peace and harmony in the system, and hereby advises the Federal Government not to stir the hornet’s nest through any form of delay tactics.”

    The SSANU and JAC Chairman, in an interview, warned that the relief expressed by stakeholders might be short-lived unless the government urgently concluded negotiations with other university-based unions.

    According to him, the “solution to this is simple: the government must deploy all necessary resources, strategies, and political will through the existing renegotiation committee to conclude discussions with the remaining three non-teaching staff unions with the speed of light.”

    In that regard, the most brilliant move this present government can make at this moment regarding industrial peace and harmony, and smooth operation of tertiary education in the country is to build on the quantum leap it has taken by finally addressing the lingering issue of the 2009 agreement renegotiation with ASUU, an issue that dragged on for 16 years.

    “Having taken this wise decision to this problem in the bud, it is only logical and strategic that the process should now flow naturally to the other university-based unions. These unions also have outstanding 2009 agreements awaiting renegotiation, and the government has already commenced discussions with them. It is, therefore, paramount, timely, and strategic that the government concludes all outstanding renegotiations, ideally within the shortest possible time, even within the next one month.

    “Doing so will send a powerful signal to workers across the university system that this is a responsive government; one that genuinely has the interest of workers and its citizens at heart. So now that that of ASUU is concluded, all eyes are focused on what the government will do concerning the conclusion of negotiation of the same 1999 agreement with NASU, SSANU and NAAT.”

    He argued that since all tertiary education–based unions have anchored their demands on the same 1999 agreement framework, stressing that the Federal Government should shun staggered or selective conclusion of negotiations with separate unions

    Ibrahim strongly advised the Federal Government to urgently conclude renegotiations with the remaining three university-based unions.

    Also, the CONUA National President, ‘Niyi Sunmonu, PhD, said his association recognised that issues arising from the 2009 agreements extend beyond a single union and affect the wider university system. The conclusion of the renegotiation between the Federal Government and ASUU, he said, in 2025 represents progress, particularly given how long those matters remained unresolved.

    “More importantly, negotiations in the university sector are ongoing and not limited to one union. Other university-based unions, including CONUA, NASU and SSANU, have outstanding issues that require timely and good-faith engagement. For reforms to be comprehensive and for industrial peace to be durable, it is essential that the Federal Government expedites negotiations with all recognised and registered unions,” Sunmonu said.

    Primary points of contention

    As of this month, the funding and labour disagreements between NASU, SSANU, and the Federal Government centre on perceived marginalisation compared to academic staff and unfulfilled financial commitments.

    The contentions include:

    The “Sharing Formula” Dispute: A major grievance involves the distribution of the N50 billion intervention fund. The unions reject the government’s formula, which they claim allocates roughly 70–80% of the funds to ASUU, leaving only 20–30% to be shared among all non-teaching unions.

    Inclusion of Specific Centres: SSANU has demanded that Inter-University Centres and research institutes, which they claim were “wrongly excluded” from previous payments, be fully included in future disbursements.

    “No Work, No Pay” Backlog: The unions are demanding the payment of salaries withheld during past industrial actions, specifically for several months in 2022.

    Salary Increment Arrears: There is a persistent demand for the payment of arrears from the 25% and 35% salary increments previously promised to university staff.

    Renegotiation of the 2009 Agreement: Following a milestone agreement signed between the Federal Government and ASUU on January 14, 2026, NASU and SSANU have warned of “chaos” and potential strike action if their own renegotiations are not fast-tracked.

    Demand for a Living Wage: The unions are seeking a comprehensive review of conditions of service and a wage increase that reflects current economic realities.

    Ministry’s position

    Following the Federal Government’s agreement with ASUU, the Federal Ministry Education is under pressure to conclude similar negotiations with the non-teaching staff to avoid disrupting industrial harmony in universities.

    Alausa has acknowledged the ongoing negotiations and indicated that the government is working to address the welfare of both academic and non-academic staff.

    The ministry has previously stated it is engaging with the unions to address grievances and has urged restraint regarding threats of strike action, asserting that the government is working in phases to meet demands.

    While the minister has expressed optimism about the ongoing process, the unions have stated that “something substantial has not yet happened,” warning that the lack of concrete, finalised offers could lead to a breakdown in peace.

    The ministry has, however, streamlined the negotiation process, moving from multiple committees to a single committee led by Yahaya Ahmed to handle negotiations with all tertiary institution unions, including NASU and SSANU.

    Stakeholders: why govt must conclude deal with SSANU, NASU

    The Chairman of Board of Trustees, National Parents Teachers Association of Nigeria (NAPTAN), Chief Adeolu Ogunbanjo, while reacting over the issue, urged the Federal Government to try and engage and negotiate with the non-academic unions.

    “But usual trouble is they also want the same thing as academic staff. And that has not been tied in with the government.

    “But if they have been doing the same thing for them, both SSANU and NASU, they should work out a commensurate service policy to also satisfy them. Definitely, I’m in total support of negotiating with them to ensure that they also treat them fairly. A situation where they won’t touch the 2009 agreement at all may be counter-productive in the university because they will now start their issues again.

    “But they should try and be reasonable when they’re on the negotiating table with the Federal Government. There’s no way that the Federal Government can treat ASUU, SSANU and NASU the same way.

    “If they have been on the same negotiating standpoint – the 2009 agreement with the ASUU, the 2009 agreement with SANU and the other bodies – it is the same thing. I think it’s only fair the government concludes the agreement with them for peace and harmony on our campuses.”

    However, Sunmonu called for inclusive, sector-wide engagement that promotes equity, transparency, and stability across the university system.

    He said: “Our position is grounded in law and international labour standards. Nigeria is a signatory to ILO Conventions 87 and 98, which guarantee freedom of association, protect collective bargaining rights, and recognise union pluralism as a legitimate feature of modern labour relations. These conventions do not establish a monopoly for any union; rather, they require good-faith bargaining and respect for lawful representation.

    Read Also: Enugu tops southeast APC e-registration as leaders rally support in Udi

    “CONUA remains committed to constructive dialogue, responsible unionism, and policies that strengthen Nigeria’s tertiary education system for the benefit of staff, students.

    The National Coordinator, Education Rights Campaign (ERC), Hassan Taiwo Soweto, in his contribution, asserted that the demands of the unions have always been rational and legitimate.

    “Also, these demands have always been in the interest of public education. Without the resolute struggle of ASUU, SSANU, NASU and other unions in the education sector, the reality would have been gorier than what is presently obtainable.

    “However, the newly signed agreement is like a drop of water into an ocean. The 40% increment in the monthly earning through additional allowance is not in conformity with the rate of inflation, which has eroded such increase in wage.

    “We strongly believe that ASUU can fight more; in fact, this agreement is a product of the relentless struggle of ASUU over the years. Left to the government, it would have watched the complete collapse of public education.

    “Importantly, we believe that the demands of SSANU and NASU must equally be met in full. However, we urge that unions in the education sector, including student unions, wage a united and resolute struggle to force government to begin the process of uplifting the education sector from its present ruin. This can only be done by properly funding the education sector and democratising the decision-making process of institutions to include the active participation of students and staff members through their independent unions.”

    National President of Association for Formidable Educational Development Orji Kanu Emmanuel told The Nation that he was concerned about the systemic challenges the government is allowing to fester.

    According to him, successive administrations’ neglect had significantly hindered progress, adding that it’s disheartening to see crucial issues linger unresolved.

    Emmanuel asserted that the unfulfilled agreements between the Federal Government and university workers since 2009 are a stark example of this trend.

    “Over 15 years of waiting for salary increments, earned allowances, and other entitlements is not just unacceptable – it’s detrimental to the very fabric of our education system.

    “As AFED’s leader, I align with NASU and SSANU’s request for the Federal Government to conclude the pending agreements. Quality education is key to Nigeria’s future, and resolving these issues is crucial to unlocking the potential of our institutions and, by extension, our nation. I appeal to the government to address NASU and SSANU’s concerns with the same urgency they’ve approached ASUU’s negotiations. This would avert pending strike actions, demonstrate commitment to education, and show that the government values the welfare of all education stakeholders.

    “I commend the current administration’s efforts to reform and prioritise education, but let’s be honest – the inherited challenges are substantial. With the strong will demonstrated by the team of ministers in charge of education, I remain hopeful that we’ll see tangible progress. Our education system deserves better, and our future depends on it,” he said.

  • ASUU, CONUA laud renegotiation deal

    ASUU, CONUA laud renegotiation deal

    • ‘More adjustments needed’

    The President of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), Prof. Chris Piwuna, has praised the Federal Government’s presentation of renegotiated agreements between the union and the government.

    This happened as the Congress of University Academics (CONUA) acknowledged the conclusion of the renegotiation process between the Federal Government and the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) in 2025.

    The new rapport, CONUA noted, arose from the 2009 agreement that had remained unresolved for many years.

    But Piwuna said there were still pending issues, which he described as internal, militating against the progress and survival of the university system.

    The ASUU president listed these as: government persistent encroachment into the Autonomy of the universities.

    Piwuna stressed that university autonomy is universally recognised as a cornerstone of a functional higher education system, adding that in Nigeria, although university autonomy is recognised in principle and partially entrenched in law, its practical implementation remains weak.

    “Finally, we are optimistic that the agreement will be implemented in totality by the Federal Government, but there still exists that pessimistic side, looking at our history with the government and the poverty of sincerity.

    Read Also: Pillarcraft is NRS System Integrator

    “It is our belief that the union would not need to issue a strike threat for the full implementation of the 2025 ASUU-FGN Renegotiated Agreement,” he said.

    The ASUU president expressed gratitude that research and development (R&D) funding is a component of the 2025 ASUU-FG renegotiated agreement, adding that Nigerian universities have faced paucity of research funding for a very long time.

    He decried the economic situation in the country, describing it as “hard” for the university system and the citizens.

    Piwuna urged the government to look for ways to make life easy for the masses.

    “Meals are hard to come by, transportation is still a challenge, and families are struggling to keep body and soul together,” he lamented.

    Also, CONUA said negotiations in the tertiary education sector were ongoing and extended beyond a single union.

    It acknowledged that discussions had continued with other unions in the university system, including its members, within the broader framework of sector-wide engagement aimed at improving conditions of service, institutional stability, and educational quality.

    In the interest of comprehensive reform and lasting industrial peace in Nigeria’s tertiary education system, CONUA’s President Niyi Sunmonu, urged the Federal Government to expedite negotiations with all recognised and registered unions, including CONUA.

    Sunmonu also stated that inclusive and timely engagement with all stakeholders would ensure equity, reduce tensions, and promote sustainable stability across the university system.

    “CONUA remains committed to constructive dialogue, responsible unionism, and policies that strengthen Nigeria’s higher education sector for the benefit of staff, students, and the nation at large,” Sunmonu said.

    Clarifying the collective bargaining and union pluralism, the CONUA president stressed that the right of workers to form and belong to unions of their choice is firmly guaranteed under Section 40 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the Trade Unions Act, and relevant International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conventions.

    He added that CONUA’s participation in ongoing discussions with the Federal Government is anchored in these settled legal and constitutional provisions.

    “Our approach remains constructive, responsible, and focused on the welfare of university academics and the stability of the university system.

    “CONUA will continue to engage calmly and professionally within the existing negotiation process, in the interest of uninterrupted academic calendars and sustainable reforms in Nigerian universities,” Sunmonu added.

  • ‘CONUA not government’s creation to weaken ASUU’

    ‘CONUA not government’s creation to weaken ASUU’

    The Congress of University Academics (CONUA) has debunked the claims by a former president of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), Hassan Sunmonu, that the union was created to weaken the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU).

    Sunmonu, who was also the General Secretary of the Organisation of African Trade Unions (OATUU), spoke on Sunday during the Toyin Falola Interview Series, which featured the theme “Trade Unions, Labour, and African Politics.”

    In a statement, CONUA debunked  Sunmonu’s claim, saying it was flawed in logic and inconsistent with established Nigerian and international labour law principles.

    Read Also: Akwashiki’s death devastating loss to Nigeria, says Adebayo

    The academic union claimed that it was formed out of genuine reformist convictions within the university system and not from any government design.

    The union said it was formally registered in 2023 after full compliance with Nigerian legal requirements.

    It claimed that all attempts by ASUU to block its registration, administratively failed, and its subsequent legal challenge at the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN), also failed in July 2023.

    “The court’s decision rested on clear statutory and procedural foundations. First, the court affirmed that Section 27 of the Trade Union Act permits the existence of more than one union in a single place of employment and expressly prohibits trade union monopoly.

  • CONUA, NAPPS, others align with halt of full CBT exams

    CONUA, NAPPS, others align with halt of full CBT exams

    The House of Representatives’ order on the halt of full transition to Computer Based Test (CBT) mode of examinations for West Africa Examinations Council (WAEC) and National Examination Council (NECO) has been greeted with commendations by stakeholders, VICTORIA AMADI reports.

    Over the years, there have been efforts to reform the educational sector. These reforms are driven by the need to address poor quality, inclusivity, improve the quality of education, increase access, strengthen governance and policy formulation, among others.

    Earlier this year, the Federal Ministry of Education directed West Africa Examinations Council (WAEC) and National Examination Council (NECO) to adopt full CBT for all their examinations in 2026.This directive was made by the Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, during his inspection of an ongoing examination.

    Alausa stated that there would be full adoption of CBT for both objective and paper exams by May/June 2026. This, he believes would help curb examination malpractice and help improve the quality of education.

    However, the House of Representatives, last week, directed the ministry and the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) to suspend the planned commencement of Computer-Based Testing (CBT) for the examination with immediate effect.

    The House urged the ministry and the state governments to make provisions in the 2026, 2027, 2028 and 2029 budgets for the recruitment of computer teachers, supply of standby generators, construction of computer halls with internet facilities, and the monitoring of private schools’ readiness before implementing the CBT policy in 2030.

    It was informed by the adoption of a motion of urgent public importance moved by Rep. Kelechi Wogu, titled: “Need for Intervention to Avert the Pending Massive Failure of Candidates Intending to Write the 2026 WAEC Examination Using Computer-Based Testing (CBT), Capable of Causing Depression and Deaths of Students”, at the plenary.

    Leading the debate, Wogu reiterated that WAEC is tasked with conducting examinations that qualify students for higher education, adding that some institutions require candidates to have at least five credits, including English and Mathematics in WAEC to gain admission.

    He recalled that the 2025 WAEC result portal was temporarily shut down due to “technical glitches,” leaving many candidates distressed.

    Rep. Wogu expressed concern that despite opposition from the Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT) and heads of schools, especially in rural areas where over 70 percent of students are located, the ministry insisted on introducing CBT for the 2026 examination.

    He warned that premature implementation of the policy could result in widespread failure, frustration, depression, and social vices among students and recommended a minimum of three years of preparation before rollout in the 2029–2030 academic session.

    The House unanimously adopted the motion and mandated its Committees on Basic Examination Bodies, Digital and Information Technology, Basic Education and Services, and Labour, Employment and Productivity to interface with relevant stakeholders in the education and technology sectors and report back within four weeks for further legislative action.

    CONUA: Directive not just a policy intervention, but a moment of national clarity

    According to the Congress of University Academics (CONUA), the House of Representatives’ directive was not just a policy intervention, but a moment of national clarity.

    The CONUA National President, Niyi Sunmonu, noted that transitioning to CBT is not inherently problematic. He re-emphasised his earlier stance on how digitalisation improves efficiency, reduces malpractice, and modernises assessment. He, however, noted that no reform succeeds by ignoring reality.

    Sunmonu also buttressed that many students, especially those in rural or underserved communities, lack stable electricity, computer access, and the digital literacy required to navigate a CBT platform confidently. Hence, a sudden nationwide switch, he warned, risked turning a progressive reform into a large-scale exclusion mechanism.

    He questioned if the rush to CBT was driven by readiness or by enthusiasm, noting that technology must align with the nature of assessment, not distort it.

    The CONUA boss noted that the legislative’s decision to push implementation to 2030, and to mandate digital infrastructure upgrades, teacher recruitment, and school certification, confirms that Nigeria needs deliberate preparation, not abrupt experimentation.

    “While the House of Reps just confirmed CONUA’s earlier warnings. And, importantly, it validates concerns CONUA raised as far back as June 2025, when the rush toward full digital examinations first became public. At the time, CONUA emphasised that transitioning to CBT is not inherently problematic.

    “Legislators noted that more than 70 percent of schools expected to present candidates for the 2026 examination lack functional computer laboratories, alternative power supplies, or qualified ICT teachers. They also referenced WAEC’s 2025 portal crash as evidence of the systemic fragility that could derail a transition of this magnitude.

    “Crucially, the House observed that WAEC examinations differ fundamentally from JAMB’s. With nine or more subjects, including essays, drawings, and practical components, WASSCE simply cannot be compressed into a uniform CBT structure without compromising quality,” he stated.

    He also advised that as the country prepares for a 2030 rollout, the challenge should no longer be whether CBT is desirable, but on how to ensure that digital examinations do not deepen inequality or push vulnerable students further behind.

    NAPPS: transition to CBT, must be thoughtful, inclusive and gradual.

    For the National Association of Proprietors of Private Schools (NAPPS) Nigeria, any transition to computer-based testing for WAEC must be thoughtful, inclusive and gradual.

    In a statement, the National President of the Association, Mr. Yomi Otubela, noted that stakeholders should be given the time and support needed to build the required capacity without placing students, teachers, or school owners under undue pressure.

    Read Also: West Africa Oil and Gas Development Nigeria Undergraduate Scholarship

    He warned that Nigeria must avoid creating a system that disadvantages learners in underserved communities or schools still strengthening their digital setups. He added that the levels of preparedness in infrastructure, power supply, digital literacy, and resource availability varies significantly between urban, semi-urban and rural communities.

    “The resolution reflects the genuine concerns raised by stakeholders across the country regarding the pace, readiness, and equity of such a major transition.

    “As an association, we recognise that the future of assessment is gradually moving towards technology-enabled testing, and we understand the intention of the WAEC and the Federal Ministry of Education to modernise examination processes. At the same time, we are aware that schools across Nigeria operate under different realities,” he said.

    NAPPS also urged the Federal Government to seize this moment to allocate sufficient resources to the education sector in the 2026 budget as advised by the House of Representatives.

    “This should align with the UNESCO-recommended funding benchmark for education. With proper investment, government-owned schools will be better equipped with computing systems that allow children to learn, practice, and sit for computer-based assessments with confidence.

    “Improved power supply and broader access to alternative energy solutions, such as solar installations, are equally essential. Schools require stable energy sources capable of supporting the systems needed for continuous learning and examinations.

    “We therefore view the suspension as an opportunity for deeper engagement. We encourage the Federal Ministry of Education, WAEC, and relevant agencies to work closely with school proprietors, teachers, parents, students, and education partners to design a phased implementation plan with clear timelines, adequate training, infrastructural support, and pilot centres that will guide the nation towards full readiness.

    “We support the proposed three-year window for infrastructure development, training, and retraining. This period will allow the country to implement a structured, sustainable, and equitable transition.”

    AFED: CBT should be treated as a process, not as an end

    The President of Association for Formidable Educational Development (AFED), Mr. Emmanuel Kanu Orji, noted that without functional computer labs, standby generators, and reliable connectivity, forcing a CBT model would inevitably lead to systemic failures, massive examination irregularities, and a surge in student frustration.

    Orji added that the motion by the House of Rep, rightly points out the shortage of qualified computer teachers, adding that even if devices were magically supplied, untrained staff would struggle to guide students through a high‑stake, computer‑based exam environment. This, he said, would compromise the validity of results and deepen the digital divide between urban and rural learners.

    He urged relevant authorities to align implementation timelines with preparedness. He buttressed that this would build credibility and ensure the sustainability of full CBT mode when finally implemented.

    He added that beyond academic outcomes, the psychological toll of potential failures, depression, anxiety, and tragic incidents cannot be ignored if it is hastily implemented.

    “My appeal is that CBT should be treated as a process, not as an end”. Orji stressed the need to prioritize student welfare over hasty policy execution.

    Parent’s stance

    A parent of a Senior Secondary (SS3) pupil, Mrs. Olajumoke Adeyemo, lauded the directive. She cited computer glitch as the main reason some pupils failed last year’s examination.

    “I am in full support of the House of Representatives order. The truth is that we are not fully prepared to practice full CBT mode of examinations. Mandating compulsory implementation of it would rather lead to mass failure, instead of solving it,” she said.

    Another parent, Mr. Bolaji Azeez, said: “We are not ready for full CBT for WAEC and NECO. Forcing it on pupils is equivalent to favouring some set of pupils who have the equipment over those in the hinterland.”

  • CONUA demands settlement of members pending entitlement

    CONUA demands settlement of members pending entitlement

    …lauds FG’s third-party deductions payment

    The Congress of University Academics (CONUA) has appealed to the federal government to expedite action on settling outstanding remuneration and welfare entitlements of its members.

    CONUA National President, Niyi Sunmonu, in a statement, lauded the government for the commencement of the payment of third-party deductions owed to its members.

    He described the release of the deductions as “a significant step towards resolving long-standing concerns and a development that contributes to rebuilding confidence in government–union relations.”

    Sunmonu recalled that the union had earlier protested the non-remittance of these deductions in a letter dated April 2, 2025, which was addressed to the Accountant-General of the Federation.

    The union also acknowledged the approval of ₦2.3 billion for clearing outstanding promotion arrears, but stressed that the amount is insufficient, as verified submissions from some universities showed the amount would not clear the full backlog. It also called for the release of additional funds to ensure no eligible member is left out.

    It further condemned the continued withholding of three-and-a-half months’ salaries of its members, stating that CONUA neither called nor participated in any strike action.

    READ ALSO; Emir of Ilorin condemns Eruku Church attack

    The statement said the withholding violates Section 43(1b) of the Trade Disputes Act, which protects workers during employer-initiated lockouts, and also violates the judgment of the National Industrial Court delivered on 25 July 2023, which affirmed CONUA as an independent union whose members cannot be punished for actions taken by another union.

    “We therefore sincerely urge the Federal Government to release these arrears as a matter of fairness, justice, and respect for the rule of law,” the statement read.

    The union also stressed that Nigerian universities continue to face critical human resource challenges, widespread brain drain, a shrinking pool of young academics, and worsening mentorship gaps.

    It noted that poor remuneration and unfavourable working conditions have resulted in low recruitment into academia.

    “If this trend continues, the university system faces the real risk of collapse within the next decade,” the statement warned.

    CONUA buttressed that academic remuneration must reflect current socio-economic realities, be globally competitive, and meet at least the African continental average to restore dignity and stability to the profession.

    The union further reaffirmed its commitment to constructive engagement and expressed hope that the payment of third-party deductions signalled sustained efforts by the government to conclusively resolve all outstanding welfare.

  • CONUA accuses ASUU of attacking members

    CONUA accuses ASUU of attacking members

    The Congress of Nigerian University Academics (CONUA), University of Benin chapter, has accused members of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) of assaulting its members.

    Chairman of CONUA, Comrade Ishaq Osagie-Eweka, who made the allegation in a chat with journalists in Benin, said members of ASUU invaded the classroom when students were writing their exams and forcefully evicted them.

    Comrade Eweka said its members were rough handled by members of ASUU.

    According to him: “They invaded the classroom, harassed the vice chairperson of the union, destroyed our phone, and I’ve sent videos to the chairman of the Nigerian Union of Journalists, Edo State council to confirm what I’ve seen on camera.

    “I want to inform the general public that the University of Benin is conducting exam as we speak. The ASUU may be on strike, but the Congress of United States of Economics are on ground to conduct exams. 

    “It is your responsibility as a union having declared strike to withdraw your services, but not to enforce your declaration on another union”, Thank you, Mr. Chairman. So, the going of protection now is that ASUU result to go on strike.”

    Read Also: UK-based Nigerian innovators to unveil CVI AI

    He called on the Inspector General of Police and other security agencies to come to their rescue and save them from undue embarrassment.

    “So, we want to use this opportunity to call on the Inspector General of Police, the Commissioner of Police, and other security agencies to ensure that CONUA members are protected from the intimidation and harassment of ASUU, who have chosen not to be civil, who have chosen to go in an attempt to enforce their will on other union academic union members.

    “We are a civil union and we believe on dialogue. We don’t believe in confrontation and we are dialoguing with government and we know in due course the welfare of our members will be meant”, Eweka said.

    Professor Godspower Ekuobase, a lecturer in the department of Computer Science, UNIBEN, confirmed attack by ASUU members.

    Leadership of UNIBEN ASUU could not be reached for comments. 

  • JUST IN: CONUA rejects planned strike action, reaffirms commitment to academic stability

    JUST IN: CONUA rejects planned strike action, reaffirms commitment to academic stability

    The leadership of the Congress of University Academics (CONUA) has declared that it is not part of any ongoing strike in Nigerian universities.

    In a statement signed by its National President, Dr. Niyi Sunmonu, the union dismissed reports circulating on social media suggesting its involvement in the industrial action.

    “CONUA wishes to categorically clarify that it has not declared any strike action and is not part of any ongoing strike,” Sunmonu stated.

    He reaffirmed the union’s commitment to maintaining academic stability, promoting excellence, and ensuring the smooth running of the university system through constructive dialogue and peaceful engagement with the government and other stakeholders.

    Sunmonu also urged members of the Congress to continue performing their academic and administrative duties diligently, report to work, engage with students, and discharge their professional responsibilities as expected.

    “It is important to emphasize that CONUA has no basis at this time to declare a dispute or embark on any strike action. When the renegotiation committee of the 2009 Agreement was inaugurated in October 2024, CONUA was conspicuously and deliberately omitted. The Union formally protested this exclusion, which
    eventually culminated in a meeting with the Honourable Minister of Education on 11 September 2025.

    Read Also: N’Assembly slates public hearing on Electoral Act Review Bill

    “At that meeting, the Honourable Minister acknowledged CONUA’s concerns and assured that the Yayale Ahmed Renegotiation Committee would be expanded to include all the academic unions in Nigeria’s federal tertiary institutions.

    “We are pleased to note that the Ministry of Education has recently expanded the committee, fulfilling that promise. Until CONUA is formally brought to the table and any of the issues it has presented to
    the Federal Government becomes subjects of dispute, there is no foundation whatsoever for any strike action by CONUA.

    “Resolutions from Nationwide Congresses following the 11 September meeting, the national leadership reported the outcome to members across universities, after which congresses were held between 18 and 24 September 2025. At these congresses, members unanimously reaffirmed CONUA’s principled stance that no strike action should be taken and that engagement, not disruption, remains the best path forward for the Nigerian university system,” it read.

    CONUA boss, however, appealed to Vice Chancellors to ensure the safety and protection of CONUA members in continuing their legitimate duties within their respective institutions.

    He equally encouraged students to remain focused on their academic pursuits without fear of interruption, adding that the Union stands by its commitment to quality education, national development, and
    peaceful industrial relations in the university system.

    “CONUA’s unwavering focus is on building a sustainable, innovative, and productive academic environment that serves the interests of students, scholars and the nation.

    “We appreciate the understanding and cooperation of all stakeholders in supporting this constructive orting this constructive approach to advancing higher education in Nigeria,” he added.

  • Sunmonu: CONUA not ready to embark on strike

    Sunmonu: CONUA not ready to embark on strike

    The Congress of University Academics (CONUA) has said that it is not ready to embark on industrial action to make the government accede to its demands.

    In a statement on Sunday, CONUA national president, Niyi Sunmonu, noted that strikes have historically failed to yield meaningful or sustainable results, and instead have inflicted deep harm on universities, students, parents, and the nation at large.

    The statement followed the union’s meeting with Education Minister, Dr Tunji Alausa on September 11, where all issues affecting the union were formally presented and discussed.

    According to him, “These included, but were not limited to CONUA’s participation in the renegotiation of the 2009 Agreement; the union’s consistent and fair inclusion in union-related programmes of agencies under the Federal Ministry of Education such as TETFund, NEEDS Assessment, NUC, and TISSF; as well as broader matters of equity, international conventions, and lawful entitlements.

    Read Also: CONUA to Fed Govt: TISSF loan scheme shouldn’t replace earned allowances, others

    Sunmonu disclosed that after meeting the minister the outcome of that engagement was transmitted to members nationwide and upon which congresses were convened between 18 and 24 September 2025 leading to a strong and consistent rejection of strike as an instrument of engagement.

    He said, “CONUA will continue to prioritise peaceful resolution, constructive discussions, and negotiations with relevant authorities as the only sustainable pathway to addressing the challenges facing university academics.

    CONUA acknowledges with appreciation the formal recognition granted by the federal government. 

    The union insisted, however, that such recognition must translate into consistent and equitable inclusion in all negotiations, programmes, and frameworks under the Ministry and its agencies.

    “While some of CONUA’s concerns may align with those of sister unions, the union shall not embark on industrial action over matters where it has not been fully engaged or consulted. Instead, it will advocate for reasoned dialogue, proactive negotiation, and evidence-based solutions.

    “CONUA reiterates that Nigeria’s universities require stability, focus, and a forward-looking culture of problem-solving. The union remains firmly committed to academic responsibility, dignity, and constructive partnership with all stakeholders for the greater good of Nigerian education.”

  • Nigeria’s university system dying

    Nigeria’s university system dying

    Sir: When the Congress of University Academics (CONUA) was officially registered as a trade union in October 2022, it did not emerge to merely add to the number of voices in the academic labour space. It was born, among others, out of deep concern over the future of university education in Nigeria, a future that has become increasingly uncertain due to the systematic neglect of academics and the erosion of the values that once upheld the profession.

    CONUA has since then been committed to constructive engagement, principled unionism, and unwavering advocacy for an academic environment free from disruptions, politicisation, and stagnation. Within its short period of existence, CONUA has engaged relevant agencies, submitted position papers, even to the National Assembly, sought and got invitations to the renegotiation table but yet to be brought there actively, and consistently pressed for one fundamental necessity: an urgent review of the conditions of service of university academics in Nigeria.

    It is no secret that since 2009 – for 16 long years – the remuneration of Nigerian lecturers has remained unchanged. In the same period, the cost of living has skyrocketed, the naira has lost significant value, and inflation has eaten deep into every household.

    Yet, university lecturers, the minds tasked with shaping future generations, are left to survive on salaries negotiated in a different era, under vastly different realities. This is an unacceptable tragedy.

    Let us not forget that in the 1960s through the mid-1970s, Nigerian academics were among the best paid on the continent. The universities then were global hubs of research and scholarship, attracting both scholars and students from across the world. Nigerian academic products were sought after globally, not just because of talent, but also because of the quality and rigour of the system. Today, that reputation is in decline, not for lack of competent academics, but for lack of deliberate investment and priority.

    Research funding has also been a casualty of the state’s neglect. Laboratories are either under-equipped or in total disrepair, journal subscriptions are unaffordable, and grants are scarce and sometimes politicised. Academics who want to do cutting-edge research have to fund it from their meagre salaries or rely on foreign grants, which sometimes come with problematic conditions.

    Read Also: Presidency challenges opposition to present alternatives, not just criticisms

    Meanwhile, the proliferation of universities without direction or adequate funding has worsened the quality crisis. What kind of future is the government building when it expands structures without strengthening their foundations?

    This is why CONUA has repeatedly urged the Federal Government to act fast. The warning signs are clear: low morale among lecturers, increasing brain drain, dilapidated infrastructure, and disillusionment among students.  A nation that devalues its knowledge workers will soon lose the capacity to develop.

    Let this be a final word of caution: if the Federal Government fails to address the fundamental issues of corruption within the system, poor remuneration, inadequate research funding, and the mismanagement of university expansion, then we are racing toward a total collapse of the academic system. Not only would this cripple the university system, it would ultimately undermine national development, security, and sovereignty.

    The time to act is now. Not with rhetoric or tokenistic gestures, but with concrete policy action, fair negotiation, and measurable commitment to the revival of the Nigerian university system.

    CONUA remains available for principled dialogue. But let it be known: no society survives for long after abandoning its thinkers.

    •Prof. Henri Oripeloye

     National Secretary, CONUA

  • CONUA backs solar initiative for public institutions

    CONUA backs solar initiative for public institutions

    The Congress of University Academics (CONUA) has reiterated its readiness to engage constructively and to partner with relevant government agencies to ensure that the Solarisation Initiative to provide alternate power sources for public institutions; universities and teaching hospitals delivers long-term value for the university system.

    This was stated in a statement by the National President of CONUA, Mr. Niyi Sunmonu, PhD.

    “CONUA has noted with interest the Federal Government’s plan to deploy N100 billion under the National Public Sector Solarisation Initiative to provide alternate power sources for our public institutions; universities and teaching hospitals. The union recognises the intent behind this ambitious proposal, which is to reduce the cost of governance and improve energy efficiency across public institutions,” it read.

     The body noted that the project’s model of execution, accountability and sustainability is of paramount importance.

    CONUA further advised that it is imperative that academic communities, especially technical and engineering faculties, are consulted and involved in both the design and execution of this solarisation initiative.

    “The success of the project, lies not in external procurement alone, but in leveraging local expertise, ensuring transparency, and embedding institutional ownership from the start.”

    Read Also: CONUA calls for rescue of abducted JOSTUM students

    Sunmonu, however, urged the Ministry of Power to ensure equitable distribution, avoid politically motivated selection of institutions and publish a clear and phased implementation plan. He added that the project, if genuinely pursued, has the potential to relieve institutions of the burden of high electricity bills and improve teaching, research, and health services.

    “Past experiences show a disturbing pattern of such projects either being abandoned or poorly executed. A case in point is the similar electricity project initiated at the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), which began over five years ago and remains incomplete till today, despite massive resource outlay.