Tag: costly

  • Arik: Too costly to be allowed to fail

    It was Jawaharlal Nehru who once said: “Failure comes only when we forget our ideals and objectives and principles.”

    Year 2016 marked the 10th anniversary of Arik Airline. The airline rose from the ashes of the defunct national carrier, Nigeria Airways and efforts to create another one in partnership with Richard Branson’s Virgin Atlantic.

    When Joseph Arumemi-Ikhide saw this vacuum, he thought he could fill it. According to information on Arik’s website, he bought a Hawker jet aircraft. “Colleagues and contacts in the gas and oil industry started using the Hawker jet to fly themselves around Nigeria,” continues the report. “So, another jet was acquired and, before long, a corporate jet business was launched. The next step was to find the right people and the right aircraft to build an airline that would set new standards and change the face of aviation in Africa. Arik Air was born — an airline with whom “Nigeria and the rest of Africa would be proud to fly.”

    The company’s growth was rapid. By the end of 2012, Arik Air had successfully flown over 10 million passengers in less than six years of operation across a network of 41 domestic and international routes. It was operating an average of 120 flights daily from its two hubs at Murtala Mohammed International Airport, Lagos and Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, Nigeria. At the peak of its growth, Arik was the darling of many Nigerians. It commanded 55% of the airline load in the country.

    However, it is said that success breeds complacency and complacency often leads to failure.  Soon, the airline’s management took the wrong turn, somehow. And the centre could not hold any longer. Delays in flight departure and outright cancellation soon became the hallmark of the airline. One after the other, all the core values of the airline were gradually compromised; safety and reliability; honesty and integrity; and respect for the dignity of our customers, fellow colleagues and our communities became hollowed and mere rhetoric.

    Last Thursday, the Federal government of Nigeria, through the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), announced a takeover of Arik Air to prevent it going bust.  Akin to the euphemism “too big to fail” that gained currency from the act of government bailout of US and European banks in the years following the subprime loans bust of 2008, Nigeria’s biggest national carrier, Arik Air, is being forced into receivership because it will be too costly to allow it to fail with a whopping N300 billion debt overhang.

    Like other similar interventions by AMCON, especially in the banking sector, this one too is aimed to “instill sanity” in the country’s aviation sector and to prevent a major catastrophe. Before now, AMCON intervened to save Aero Contractors, another airline on the verge of total collapse, with greater relief to the aviation industry. Similar interventions by AMCON in the banking industry have helped brought stability in the financial sector of the country. Since its establishment in 2010 AMCON has acquired about 13,774 Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) worth N3.6 trillion from 22 commercial banks, in the process saving our banking system, while its provision of financial accommodation of N2.2billion protected about N4.7trillion of depositors’ funds and interbank takings as well as saved approximately 14,000 jobs.

    AMCON has, through these interventions in the past, helped a lot of businesses bounce back and hit the path of recovery. In one of his numerous interactions with the media, the Managing Director of AMCON, Ahmed Kuru, underscored the raison d’être of his organization’s interventions thus:  “We don’t want any business to suffer because of their debts. We are not out to kill businesses but to encourage them to grow by following the global best practices in debt reconciliations and settlements. Our desire is to recover the money for the nation through painless processes.”

    Reports have it that the beleaguered airline was indebted to the tune of over N300bn, with AMCON alone owed N135bn; while its obligations to aviation fuel suppliers, insurance firms, aircraft maintenance organizations, the Federal Government and the various aviation agencies, as well as food vendors, made up the balance. This was a clearly precarious situation that pointed to the fast deterioration of the Arik Air services on both its domestic and international routes.

    A BBC reporter in Nigeria, Martin Patience, captured his experience with Arik services in the following words: “To fly Arik often means never getting off the ground. I was at Enugu airport when I was told my flight was cancelled. The man beside me at the check-in desk just shook his head – all his flights had been cancelled for the past two days.

    “Customer service at Arik Air is at times non-existent. When the airline cancels a flight, most of the time its ground staff flee rather than deal with the fallout from irate passengers.”

    “As the company’s troubles mounted at the end of last year, 70% of its international flights were delayed.”

    “The firm’s staff bears the brunt for an airline that even by Nigerian standards is a byword for utter dysfunction. Last month the company was forced to issue a plea for passengers not to attack its employees.”

    This writer, too, has had his own share of this experience. Indeed, hardly will you find a frequent flyer of domestic flights in Nigeria without a bitter and hard-to-forget experience of flying on Arik.

    Nothing explains this recurrent unfortunate experience by Arik customers better than lack of strict adherence to the tenets of corporate governance by its management.  Its poor services became a far cry from the airline’s sublime objective “to operate above and beyond the highest standards of safety and security and to offer a superior level of customer service and to deliver on all promises made to our guests.”

    Early this year the patience of Arik passengers was pushed to its limit. A video that went viral on the Internet on January 5 depicted the customer liaison manager of Arik being assaulted by a group of aggrieved passengers whose flight to Johannesburg was cancelled three times. The management of the airline was quick to blame frequent flight cancellation on aviation fuel shortages in the country. Although that could be true to some extent, there are other failings from the management of the airlines that became noticeable, such as the strikes embarked by its staff or the shutting down of the airline offices throughout the country by a couple of unions that brought untold hardship on its passengers last December.

    Many other serious failings of the management of Arik were reeled out by AMCON in the wake of the takeover of the airline by the corporation. They include, among others, poor corporate governance, demotivated pilots, poor safety measures, which is unacceptable in aviation business and the airline’s inability to meet its financial obligations.

    Arik management may attempt to contest the takeover, as the Deputy Managing Director, Captain Ado Sunusi, is reported to have said, but in the reckoning of stakeholders, the Arik takeover by AMCON is a welcome intervention. As clearly stated, AMCON intervened to afford Arik the opportunity to go back to regular and undisrupted operations, avoid job losses, protect investors and stakeholders’ funds as well as ensure safety and stability in the already challenged aviation sector.

    What can be a better option for Arik than this? In all honesty, can the management of Arik afford its blooming debt burden?  What has become evident is that the Buhari administration has seen positive results in these takeovers by AMCON and has been inclined to encourage it to the delights of Nigerians. Surely, AMCON is in good hands of its Managing Director and his team enjoying his experience and expertise as a thorough-bred banker and risk management guru. I have two pieces of advices to all stakeholders.

    The first is for all stakeholders in this unfolding event to manage their expectations of AMCON’s takeover—we should not expect magical turnaround of Arik in a month or two. The rot in Arik that have seen it plummeting from commanding of 30 aircrafts in its heydays to just nine today cannot be purified in few months’ time.

    The second is for all to put their sentiments aside and cooperate with the new managers and the receivers in their efforts to see to it that Arik navigates out of the current turbulent weather to a steady cruising level that will eventually land it into safer rebirth.

     

    • Hassan contributed this piece from Abuja.
  • Report faults claim of Nigeria’s costly pay TV service

    The Chief Executive Officer, Hi-Impact Media, a content marketing firm in East Africa, Mr. Yinka Agbede, has faulted claims that Nigeria’s pay TV service is the most expensive in Africa.

    He said Multichoice, believed to be enjoying a monopoly in the country, boasts of higher subscription rates in other African countries.

    He said the owner of the Digital System for Television (DStv), has premium subscription rates in Africa with Nigerians paying the second lowest of between $42 and $44, despite the increased exchange rate.

    He said Mozambique (English) pays between $40 and $43.

    According to him, Ghana pays between $80 and $93, Kenya  $76 and $93, while Uganda and Tanzania pay $81.

    While comparing the rates, Agbede said the platform’s two other bouquets-Compact Plus and Compact-Nigerian subscribers pay between N9,300 and N6000 ($28 to $30) and ($18 to $19) for the bouquets while Ghanaians pay between $54 and $67 for Compact plus and ($32 to $41) for Compact, Kenya pays between $52 and $63 and from $30 to $37.

    He said Tanzania and Uganda pay between $54 and $67 and $31 and Zimbabwe $55 for the Compact plus.

    Faced with price war from fringe players, such as StarTimes, CONSAT, Montage, among others, DSTV has over 10.4 million subscribers in Africa, over 1.5 million in Nigeria.

    A PwC report stated that Nigeria’s pay-tv household is expected to hit 3.2 million by 2019, constituting the biggest market share for DStv.

    But with the economic crisis, some players are facing challenges of staying afloat in the market. According to subscribers, ACTV, DAASAT are hardly showing anymore but market reports show that StarTimes is a formidable competitor which has kicked off strong campaign to check Multichoice dominance in the market. It subscribers pays as low as between N800 with the premium subscription (full bouquet) at the rate of N3,600.

    Meanwhile, the Managing Director of Multichoice, John Ugbe, said: “We try to minimise the impact. In Nigeria, we have been very fortunate that after the price we put through on April 1, 2016, we haven’t had to put another price increase into the maket yet.”

    Why Nigerian panic that DStv may increase it rate this year, Ugbe said, “At the moment we have been able to avoid increasing rates in Nigeria, despite increase in exchange rate and that is largely because the government and the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, have been strong on policy decision-making.”

    But he said the brand has shown empathy base on the prevailing circumstances. “We also understand that there are times when we do things that are not popular, but we do it in the interest of the business. So , because we are very conscious of the way that the consumers are likely to react, we tend to think quite deeply before we do stuff that is going to result in a negative impact.”

    But, analysts still believe the tide might change as the recession is putting pressure on most businesses to retrench, restrategise or close shop.

  • Cheap but costly

    Cheap but costly

    •Substandard products cost Nigeria about N50 billion annually

    Since her oil boom years started in the late 70s, Nigeria has become haven for cheap, substandard and fake products from virtually all over the world. Successive weak governments and poor consumer monitoring and regulatory regimes have over the years opened the floodgate for the importation of cheaply priced but very low quality goods and products into Nigeria.

    The situation has become so pervasive today that Nigerian businessmen would scour the globe seeking for the poorest quality and sometimes, adulterated products to ship into Nigeria. What seems to be paramount to them is the profit they stand to make and not the overall cost of their venture to the nation’s economy.

    However members of the Organised Private Sector (OPS), a business group comprised of local industrialists have, once again, called attention to the dangers of unbridled importation of substandard goods and products. In a recent media release, the OPS noted that Nigeria may be losing about N50 billion annually.

    Following from the recent trip of President Muhammadu Buhari to India, members of the OPS are elated that the president in his speech, made a point of letting the Indian government realize that Nigeria would no longer accept the influx of poor quality and adulterated goods from India into her shores. Considering that a large chunk of such goods come from India, China and other countries of Asia, that pronouncement was quite timely and will be expected to signpost Nigeria’s resolve to fight this canker that has almost damaged her economy.

    There is no doubt that the haemorrhaging of Nigeria’s economy arising from indiscriminate importation of goods may be far worse that the OPS envisages. One of the most crucial costs is the toll on local industries, especially the small and medium scale enterprises. It is apposite that this segment of the economy will never grow if it is besieged by cheap, fake goods. And which economy ever takes off the ground in a situation where small scale manufacturing is stymied? The cost, in this instance, to the economy is enormous, if not unquantifiable.

    There also the cost to a populace bedeviled by a suffusion of counterfeit and substandard goods that hardly serve the purpose for which they are purchased and of course, do not survive more than  a few usages. Therefore, the purchase of these goods often amount to money thrown down the drains.

    It is indeed quite salutary that President Buhari recognised this crucial ill of Nigeria’s economy and had the presence of mind to mention it at the right quarters in India. We hope that the Federal Government would take that matter beyond mere speech-making and see it for the ulcer it is to Nigeria’s economy.

    We expect that the various ministries, departments and agencies of government would come to a round table and initiate an all-encompassing campaign. The Ministry of Trade and Industry must own and lead this crucial drive to curtail what must be regarded as a clear economic sabotage. Also to play leading role in this fight would be Nigeria’s economic attaches in her foreign missions and the Nigeria Customs Service.

    Regulatory and monitoring agencies like the Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON), the National Agency for Food, Drugs Administration and Control (NAFDAC) and the Consumer Protection Council (CPC), must all be made to wake up to their duties and responsibilities. The Central Bank of Nigeria and commercial banks must all be put on notice to ensure that they do not fund or facilitate the importation of products that are known to be debilitating to Nigeria’s economy.

    Finally, we must embrace a culture of excellence and quality in all our businesses and transactions. Standard is a worldwide and well calibrated phenomenon. No country would make hay transacting business otherwise. Whether we like it or not, the world would only accept ‘world standard’ imports from us or nothing; by the same token, we must also insist on reciprocal quality.

    Just as the world has become used to the famous ‘British Standard’, time is now for Nigeria to reevaluate and redefine her standards. We can create the ‘Nigerian Standard’ too.

  • ‘Another polls shift’ll be too costly’

    ‘Another polls shift’ll be too costly’

    The Lagos State Coordinator of the Buhari/Osinbajo Presidential Campaign Organisation, James Faleke, has said the country cannot afford a further postponement of the elections.

    At a briefing yesterday in Lagos, he said the postponement of the election from February to March was a manipulation by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to undermine the democratic process and wear out the opposition.

    Faleke, a member of the House of Representatives, said: “We say no to further shift of the goal post in the middle of the game. Beyond the security challenges, PDP wanted to boost its war chest to avert an imminent defeat.

    “It was to allow the ruling PDP re-strategise and burn out the opposition financially since it has the war chest. We know that the bazaar has been on. But one thing is sure, the PDP cannot continue to fool Nigerians all the time.”

    He said dragging the military institution into partisan politics is unacceptable, noting that the Armed Forces should restrict their operations to the protection of Nigeria’s territorial integrity.

    Faleke added that those rooting for the military involvement in the election are enemies of the country.

    “Our appeal to Nigerians, especially all lovers of progress and change, is to get the Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs). The voter card is stronger than the federal might.”