Tag: council autonomy

  • State Police, council autonomy, electoral reforms top 87 issues in Constitution review

    State Police, council autonomy, electoral reforms top 87 issues in Constitution review

    State Police, Council autonomy and special seats for women top the eighty-seven Constitution amendment Bills being proposed by the House of Representatives’ Committee on Constitution review.

    Also being considered are “extensive electoral reforms, including proposals for independent candidacy, the establishment of an Electoral Offences Commission, and a fixed timeline for the determination of pre-election matters to ensure that the will of the people is never again subverted by legal technicalities”.

    This was made known yesterday at a one-day public hearing on the amendment of the 1999 Constitution review by the panel in Abuja.

    Some other issues are Electoral and Judicial reforms,  devolution of powers, strengthening of public and traditional Institutions, as well as citizenship and Indigeneship. 

    While the bill for state and community policing seeks the establishment of state and community police systems, that of women and People Living with disabilities (PLWDs) proposes constitutionally guaranteed seats for women and persons with disabilities in the National Assembly and Houses of Assembly.

    The sponsors of the bill for financial and administrative independence for local governments are seeking to enhance the autonomy of the third tier of government via a structured system of Executive and Legislative arms.

    READ ALSO: How to curb Corruption in Nigeria

    This will be in line with Supreme Court judgment granting financial autonomy to the 774 councils.

    The House of Representatives, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, House Speaker Abbas Tajudeen and state Assembly Speakers said much is expected of the committee.

    For the review to be meaningful, they also said that the plan should deepen democracy and ensure equity and justice.

    At the forum, traditional rulers, who renewed their  agitations for a constitutional role, clarified that the motive is not to hijack the function of elected leaders, but to serve as a bridge between the government and the governed.

    Representatives of women group also reiterated their demand for increased representation in the parliament and executive councils across the tiers.

     The Deputy Speaker and Chairman of the Constitution Review Committee, Benjamin Kalu, clarified that the bills being considered are still proposals before the National Assembly.

    The public hearing held at the Congress Hall of Transcorp Hilton, which was billed to start at about 10 am did not start until about 11.30 as the organisers struggled to control the crowd.

    ‘We are committed to constitutional reforms’

    President Tinubu, who was represented by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, reiterated his commitment to the constitutional reform that would strengthen the institutions.

    He described the process as a “golden opportunity” for Nigerians to advance democracy and nation-building. He urged them to actively participate in the historic opportunity to entrench good governance, inclusivity, and sustainable development.

    President Tinubu commended the House for creating an inclusive platform to engage with the citizens, civil society, political parties, professional groups, and traditional institutions in the amendment process.

    Abbas: There is need for increased women representation

    Abbas said Nigeria cannot prosper by leaving half of its talent and energy on the sidelines, adding that a reform that is delayed is denied.

    The Speaker said the review would pay attention to representation of under represented groups like women, youth and persons with disabilities in governance.

    Abbas said: “Today women hold less than five percent of seats in the National Assembly. That statistic is unacceptable for a country of our size and ambition”.

    The Speaker said the public hearing marked a significant moment in the nation’s democratic journey and legislative process as it crowns months of deliberate, nationwide engagement designed to ensure that Nigerians themselves shape the evolution of the supreme law.

    Assemblies will play their roles, says Bauchi Speaker

    The Conference of Speakers of State Houses of Assembly, represented by the Speaker of the Bauchi State House of Assembly, Abubakar Suleiman, said Constitution amendment is about renewing trust and rebuilding confidence in the democratic institutions.

    He added: “The Conference of Speakers is committed to playing its full role in this process. We will continue to ensure that the voices of states are heard and that the reforms agreed upon here are given the necessary ratification across our 36 Assemblies”.

    Etsu Nupe: Why we deserve political role

    The National Council of Traditional Rulers said political role would enable the monarchs to complement government structures at the grassroots.

    The Etsu Nupe and Chairman of the Niger State Council of Traditional Rulers, Alhaji Yahaya Abubakar, said “I want to make it clear to all of the members, executive members, governors, chairmen, and everybody, that this institution is not here to usurp your authorities, no. We are here to collaborate, to complement you, so that you run this country much, much better. We don’t compete at all, no competition at all.

    “We are here to complement and collaborate with all the programmes, all the policies that the government may bring. We mobilise our people, we encourage them, we make them understand because when we speak, our own mother tongue, they understand better than what I’m speaking now, English.

    “You know, when a Yoruba calls his people and tells them what to do, they understand Yoruba. The same thing with the Igbo, if he calls his people and talks to them, they understand him. So that language, that barrier must be breached.”

    The royal father who went down memory lane recalled  before the amalgamation of the Northern and Southern protectorates and the Lagos Colony to form Nigeria in 1914, the various areas were a conglomeration of kingdoms, caliphates, chiefdoms and emirates, with various levels of traditional authorities as the basis for governance.

    Kalu: Bills have not become law

    Kalu explained that the bills being considered by the National Assembly are still proposals capturing the needs and desires of the people and not yet laws.

    He said: “Before us is a compendium of 87 proposed amendment bills, each a response to the felt needs and expressed desires of the Nigerian people. They are organized around the central pillars of a modern, functional, and just society.

    “The items and amendment proposals being considered are not yet laws, but still proposals, suggestions and ideas that have emerged through one of the most inclusive and participatory exercises in Nigeria’s constitutional history.

    “Importantly, these proposals do not simply represent the agenda of the legislature; instead, they are, first and foremost, the thought-out demands, hopes, and memoranda of the Nigerian people themselves, gathered through extensive regional dialogues and topically-focused public hearings held across the nation.

    ‘It is, therefore, essential that the process is not misconstrued. The constitutional amendment journey is designed to be transparent, participatory, and fair.

    “Yet, let us also be clear: while today represents the final stage of direct public engagement in this constitutional review process, it is, by no means, the final day of work. Rather, it marks the transition to the next phase, a return to the deliberative chambers of the parliament, where all submissions will be critically sifted, refined, and improved upon in preparation for the momentous task of voting”.

    Envoys hail process

    British Deputy High Commissioner to Nigeria Geo Liva said opening the doors of the constitutional amendment process for wider citizen input demonstrated a commitment to promoting democratic debate and accountability.

    She said the huge turnout at the public hearing underscored the healthy and considerable desire there is in Nigeria for participatory democracy, assuring that the government of the United Kingdom is committed to its modest support for the process.

    Liva said: “Our support is rooted in a shared belief that inclusive governance built on public participation, built on the need for fostering public trust, is a cornerstone of a resilient democracy.

    “As your partner, the UK understands that any constitutional reform process is a complex undertaking. It needs thoughtful deliberation, the building of sufficient consensus and the creation of shared visions for future arrangements.”

    The Head of the European Union delegation to Nigeria and ECOWAS, Ambassador Gautier Mignot, said the amendments posed some logistical challenges, but shows how vibrant Nigeria’s democracy is, “even more vibrant than we would think”.

    He said: “For any democracy, constitutional reviews are opportunities to strengthen democracy and adjust it to the evolutions of society, technologies and the global environment.

    “As international partners, the EU is following very closely this process. Of course, we are very careful not to meddle into the sovereign choices of the people. But we are here to provide technical assistance, expertise, support for consultations with stakeholders.”

    The President of Network of Women with Disabilities, Lois Auta, lamented the low representation of women in governance in the country.

    She said: “As it is right now, we are at a zero level of participation in governance. We are excluded and underrepresented in every sector.

    “In Kenya, we have a visually impaired woman who is a senator in the Kenyan parliament. What is Nigeria doing? As it is, it is time we move from exclusion to inclusion, from inclusion to participation, and from participation to representation. We also need to move from policy to practise.”

  • ‘Fed Govt not to blame for non-implementation of council autonomy’

    ‘Fed Govt not to blame for non-implementation of council autonomy’

    The Senator representing Kogi West, Sunday Karimi, has absolved President Bola Tinubu and the National Assembly of blame in the slow or near-non-implementation of the Supreme Court judgment granting local governments financial autonomy.

    Karumi argued that since the apex court had made a pronouncement on the issue,  the National Assembly had business coming up with legislation on its implementation.

    ‘’Some people are not interested in this local government autonomy,” the Senator said

    ‘’Some people are not interested in this local government autonomy,” the Senator said in Lokoja, Kogi State, while giving account of his stewardship in the last two years in the 10th Senate.

    He, therefore, challenged Nigerians to demand the implementation of the Supreme   Court verdict ‘’because if we keep quiet, that autonomy will not stand.’’

    The federal lawmaker argued that the President had demonstrated his administration’s ‘’commitment and support for a functional local government system in the country’’ by taking the matter to the apex court through the Attorney-General of the Federation and Justice Minister Lateef Fagbemi (SAN). 

    Karumi also pointed that ‘’It’s not for the National Assembly alone but for the good of every Nigerian, therefore, it is a fight for all of us.

    “And for us in the National Assembly, we are fully in support of local government autonomy and the steps so far taken to restore proper governance at the local level in Nigeria.’’

    Read Also: Tinubu in support of LG autonomy – Senator Karimi

    He added: “The provisions of Section 235 of the 1999 Constitution (Section 7, Part 1) deal with the finality of determinations by the Supreme Court.

    “It states that no appeal can be made to any other body or person from a decision of the Supreme Court, except for the powers of the President or a state governor regarding the prerogative of mercy.

    “In essence, this section establishes the Supreme Court as the final arbiter of legal disputes within the country, with its decisions being binding and unappealable.

      “As a means of solving local government problems, the President wants autonomy for local government. If the Federal Government of Nigeria doesn’t want local government autonomy, it wouldn’t have instituted the case in the first place.’’

  • Fed Govt ministerial panel to enforce council autonomy

    Fed Govt ministerial panel to enforce council autonomy

    • AG-F to begin direct disbursement
    • Committee begins two-day meeting
    • Edun to brief President

    The Federal Government is taking a step forward today in the implementation of the Supreme Court judgment on local government autonomy.

    An Inter-Ministerial Committee set up to enforce the verdict would begin a two-day meeting in Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    Members of the panel will be discussing the modalities for the enforcement of the apex court verdict that mandates direct disbursements of funds to the 774 local government areas from the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC).

    The committee, chaired by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Senator George Akume, has as members Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun; Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN); Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Atiku Bagudu and the Accountant-General of the Federation (AG-F).

    Others are: Central Bank of Nigeria (NGF) Governor Yemi Cardoso; Permanent Secretary, Federal Ministry of Finance; Chairman, Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC); representative of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) and representative of the local governments.

    The AG-F has concluded plans for the disbursement of funds to democratically elected councils this week, a government source told The Nation.

    A member of the committee, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the panel’s focus is to finalise measures for achieving financial and administrative independence for the 774 councils, despite resistance by governors.

    He said the committee is expected to evolve counter-actions against some governors seeking to undermine the autonomy by maintaining direct access to funds from the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC).

    The source also disclosed that the panel would proceed with the assignment after receiving “guidelines and guidance” from the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice.

    He acknowledged the need for specific clarifications on how best to handle resistance by some state governments ahead of the commencement of direct payments to local governments this week.

    “We are waiting for the pronouncement of the Attorney-General first. We will take a position before Wednesday,” the source said.

    The two-day meeting is expected to evaluate the Committee’s progress and finalise operational frameworks for direct payments.

    According to the source, the meetings aim to address the moves by some governors to coerce elected local government leaders into truncating the objectives of the autonony.

    “The meetings will address the actions of governors attempting to undermine the autonomy of democratically elected LGA chairmen, deputies, and councilors, ensuring they are not coerced into serving state interests,” he added.

    Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, some governors are maneuvering to maintain their hold on council funds by influencing Houses of Assembly to pass laws empowering state governments to have access and retain oversight on the FAAC allocations.

    Shedding light on the challenges before the committee, he said: “There are a lot of discussions going on, but for now, honestly, we are waiting to see. While all the states have conducted local government elections, some governors are determined to maintain financial control over local government areas.”

    In preparation for the Supreme Court judgment’s implementation, the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation (OAGF) confirmed its readiness to commence direct FAAC disbursements to councils.

    A senior OAGF official disclosed that structures are already in place to ensure a seamless transition.

    The official said: “It won’t be a challenge to carry out the approval from the minister to start making the disbursements to the LGAs. The structure has been on the ground.”

    He pointed out that a dedicated department within the OAGF would oversees the processes, assuring that the transition will proceed smoothly.

    Read Also: How council autonomy can work, by Omoworare

    “A whole department is in charge of it. So, it’s not going to be a challenge. I can confirm that,” he stressed.

    The source hinted that Finance minister might consult with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu upon his return to the country this week to finalise strategies for dealing with governors.

    “The minister of Finance might have discussions with President Bola Tinubu and others on how to address the issue of governors. But we are paying local government areas directly.

    “We don’t want to presume anything. Everyone knows the judgment has been made, and we are waiting for the government to start implementing.”

    The enforcement of direct FAAC allocations to local governments marks a significant shift in local government administration. It is aimed at curbing undue interference by governors.

    Historically, funds meant for grassroots development were disbursed through joint accounts controlled by governors, often leading to delays and diversions.

  • Council autonomy: ‘It’s time to hold chairmen accountable’

    Council autonomy: ‘It’s time to hold chairmen accountable’

    The Supreme Court judgment on local government autonomy will not only strengthen democracy but place greater scrutiny on chairmen of the tir of government, a House of Representatives member, Adetunji Akinyemi, has said.

    Justice Emmanuel Agim, on July 11, delivered the judgment that mandates local governments to receive their allocations directly from the Federation Account.

    In a statement, Akinyemi noted that with the ruling, citizens should rejoice because funds meant to build roads, schools, and health centres in their communities would henceforth be directly accessible to those charged with delivering such services.

    The lawmaker described the court verdict as a game-changer for local government administration.

    Read Also: Tinubu orders review of road safety measures after Niger tanker explosion

    According to him, the ruling is not just about money but power, which has been returned to the people.

    Akinyemi said citizens would also be able to hold leaders accountable while governors’ control over local government funds would no longer happen.

    The lawmaker said local government chairmen would be truly accountable to their constituents, and this should excite every citizen.

    He said: “Citizens, it’s time to dust off those voter’s cards and get to know the people running your local governments. No longer can chairmen hide behind the cloak of ‘the state government didn’t release the funds’.

  • Stakeholders hail council autonomy

    Stakeholders hail council autonomy

    Stakeholders in Lagos State hoped local government autonomy would revolutionise governance at the grassroots.

    At a forum held in Ikeja, the Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR), in collaboration with the Centre for Anti-Corruption and Open Leadership (CACOL), convened a gathering of key players to discuss the implications of the autonomy in the state.

    CDHR President Debo Adeniran described the historic development of local government autonomy as a potential game-changer for grassroots development.

    “This ruling is more than just a legal milestone; it’s a game-changer for local governance. Local governments, being the closest to the people, are now empowered to make decisions and implement projects that directly benefit their communities, thereby fostering better governance and accountability,” he said.

    He called for continued support from stakeholders to ensure the promise of financial autonomy translates into benefits for the people.

    Read Also: How Supreme Court’s ruling on council autonomy can benefit primary healthcare

    Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Bolaji Kayode Robert, along with other government officials, underscored the significance ‘’of this newfound autonomy in empowering local governments to manage their finances independently, free from state government interference.

    Special Adviser on Political, Legislative and Civic Engagement to the Governor, Dr Abiodun Afolabi, represented by Arura Ayodeji, emphasised the critical responsibility ‘’that now falls on local governments.’’

    Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Gbenga Omotoso, represented by Adesegun Ogundeji, who led a panel discussion, highlighted potential conflicts that could arise between state and local governments, particularly in areas such as education and infrastructure.

  • ‘Governors should aid council autonomy’

    ‘Governors should aid council autonomy’

    Chieftain of All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ogun state, Gbenga Akinwande, has greeted Governor Dapo Abiodun as chairman of Southern Governors’ Forum.

    Akinwande noted Abiodun’s choice as chair is a testimony on his character as bridge-builder and leadership qualities.

    He added this is also proof of his excellent leadership, dedication, and commitment to progress and unity of Nigeria.

    Read Also: I believe in council autonomy, says Kwara governor

    “Abiodun’s efforts have inspired confidence and admiration among his colleagues, which was responsible for his choice’’.

    Akinwande urged the chair and his deputy, Anambra State Governor, Charles Soludo, to mobilise colleagues in South and North to ensure local government autonomy becomes a reality.

    He said: “The duo can be bridge-builders on this struggle and be positive influencers, so President Bola Tinubu resolve to wait for Supreme Court judgment will be needless and the issue resolved amicably without court pronouncement.”

  • I believe in council autonomy, says Kwara governor

    I believe in council autonomy, says Kwara governor

    Kwara State Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq yesterday said he believes in full autonomy for local government areas.

    He clarified that the position of the state in the ongoing legal proceedings on local government is that the state does not violate any section of the law regarding autonomy.

    “It is my personal belief that each local government should manage its resources and be responsible for its obligations, including wages that are first line charges. I also believe that the State Governor should not be held liable if any local government is unable to pay salaries since we do not touch a kobo of their money.

    “We also do not have any joint project accounts with any local government in the state, as was the case with the previous administration in our state.

    Read Also: Council autonomy battle rages at Supreme Court

    “These are my personal beliefs. But my personal belief is not necessarily the same as the letters of the law, including the provisions of the JAAC, which is a creation of the Constitution. As of today, local government allocations are sent to the JAAC as required by the law. Section 162 of the Constitution is very clear on this.

    “As things stand today, no activity of the local government in Kwara State is at variance with these provisions of the law. Our case in the court is not about my personal belief. It is, we believe, in the defence of the constitution, which created JAAC for reasons that are well-grounded in our experiences as a people. JAAC, in summary, pulls resources together to pay all teachers, health workers, traditional rulers, and other statutory duties listed in the schedule of the local government areas. If we all want these to change as a national consensus, we believe that the constitution will have to be amended to expunge JAAC,” the governor said.

  • Battle over council autonomy between Fed Govt, states heightens

    Battle over council autonomy between Fed Govt, states heightens

    States are kicking against local government autonomy because they feel that the Federal Government may incite the councils against them, Chairman of Conference of Speakers of House of Assembly Adebo Ogundoyin said yesterday.

    He said financial and administrative autonomy for councils will engender massive corruption at the grassroots units of administration.

    Ogundoyin, who is Speaker of the Oyo State House of Assembly, said the anti-graft bodies do not have the manpower and financial resources to investigate corruption at the local level.

    He spoke at the national conference on security challenges and good governance at the local government levels organised by the House of Representatives in Abuja.

    It was the first major reaction to the litigation on council autonomy involving the Federal Government and the states by any organ of government.

    At the conference, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu expressed worry about the state of the local government, saying that conflict at that level would have been reduced if there had been good governance.

    Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice  Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), who sued the states on behalf of the Federal Government, called for the scrapping of the State Independent Electoral Commissions (SIECS) because they have aided the imposition of chairmen and councillors by governors.

    Also dissecting the local government system, House of Representatives Speaker Tajudeen Abbas attributed the lack of grassroots development to the weakness of governance at the local level.

    Echoing him, House of Representatives Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu said non-state actors were exploiting ungoverned spaces created by governance failure to wreak havoc.

    Why states are against autonomy, by Ogundoyin

    Ogundoyin, who feared that the Federal Government may incite councils against state authorities, said apart from inadequate resources that may hamper the efficient management of urbanised councils, autonomy will pave the way for the misappropriation of council funds by officials.

    He said: “The LGA will be answerable to the Federal Government and other federal agencies, e.g EFCC, House of Representatives, which will have oversight functions over the LGA.

    “Then, there is the issue of accountability and transparency, which are already a challenge at both national and sub-national levels.

    “Going by what we see during oversights, these problems already persist in an incapacitated local government system.

    “One can only imagine the extent of these problems once there are more resources given to them directly.

    “Let us also not forget the possibility of the Federal Government usurping the roles of the state governments as the popular saying goes: he who pays the piper dictates the tune.’

    “It is, therefore, the general belief of the states that the centre can use the local government as an instrument against them.

    “On the other hand, let us equally imagine a scenario where state governments have the authority to determine the number of local governments they choose to have for administrative purposes.

    “For me, it is then that we will start enjoying more dividends of true federalism. So, the issue of creation of local governments by states is yet another challenge.”

    Ogundoyin added: “The problem of low revenue generation capacity for local governments is another issue. It is a common belief that the state government hinders the ability of the local governments to generate revenue, but we also have to recognise that most local governments are in rural environments, which makes it more difficult for them to generate revenue.

    “It is rather worrisome that most local governments depend on the Federation Account for their spending, including payment of staff salary.”

    Noting that good governance, which encompasses transparency, accountability, inclusivity, and responsiveness is the bedrock of a prosperous society, he said: “At the sub-national level, where the government is closest to the people, these principles are even more vital.

    “Nigeria has 774 local government areas (LGAs). They are seen as viable instruments for development and the delivery of social services to the people as a result of their proximity to the grassroots.

    “However, one can say that virtually all of them are experiencing the same challenges in terms of service delivery and effective governance.

    “The question as to whether local government autonomy is the solution to these problems is widely debated and I am certain that the debate will carry on until we determine the kind of governmental system we choose to adopt holistically.

    “Do we adopt a federal system of government or a government which will retain more powers at the centre?”

    Ogundoyin said local governments must evolve new ways to generate more money to augment what is coming from the Federation Account through the states.

    He added: “It is also necessary for the states to leave local taxes and levies, commercial activities, eg (public transportation), markets, car parks etc.

    “This will enable local governments to use money generated as IGR to discharge their statutory responsibilities and embark on more developmental projects.

    “Another challenge is lack of capacity and professionalism. Regularly upgrading the skills, knowledge and capacity of the local government staff will lead to optimum performance.”

    ‘How councils can foster development’

    Tinubu lamented that poor governance at the local government has contributed to the developmental setbacks and inability to address prevailing national security threats.

    Read Also: Onjeh commends FG’s renewed drive for council autonomy

    The President, who was represented by the Minister of Defence, Abubakar Badaru, said good governance would address terrorism, insurgency and communal violence.

    He observed that the absence of good governance would lead to widespread corruption, political instability, economic disparities and social unrest, which could undermine security and deprive individuals of their basic needs, adding that it could also lead to extremism.

    President Tinubu said: “Sadly, the state of our local government system in Nigeria is a cause of concern as its degradation and incapacitation have continued and contributed significantly to our developmental setback and our inability to effectively address the prevailing national security threat.

    “We find ourselves trapped in a paradoxical situation where the very areas most affected by security classes are rendered powerless and unable to mount any meaningful resistance or defence.

    “Local governments are the frontline defenders against insecurity as they are closest to the people and possess intimate knowledge of their communities’ needs and challenges. This is why some are advocating for community policing, as a panacea to end security challenges.”

    President Tinubu said security has persisted over time, posing a threat to the safety and well-being of Nigerians.

    He said: “The world was hit by those security skirmishes in the rural areas as our local populace and the economy continue to be unsettled by enemies of the state.

    “I make bold to say that since I assumed office, we have made significant strides and achieved remarkable results in our effort to secure our nation.

    “So much more needs to be done particularly by governments within the local areas where those attacks are prominent.”

    The President urged Nigerians to explore the nexus of good governance, human security and national security, adding that the three elements play important roles in shaping the stability, prosperity, and well-being of the nation.

    President Tinubu said local governments, being the closest government to the people, are strategically in a position to promote human security by delivering essential services like health, education, sanitation and social welfare programmes directly to communities where they are most needed.

    He said: “They are important in ensuring that our communities are safe, prosperous and resilient.

    “Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to strengthen our local government system to effectively address those challenges. “

    Abbass: Councils have failed to live up to their billing

    Abbas said widespread insecurity can be linked to the non-existence or weakness of governance at the local government level.

    Represented by Kalu, the Speaker said addressing these challenges is crucial to good governance and strengthening of national security.

    He paid tribute to Nigerians for their unwavering faith in democracy in the last 25 years.

    He said the House was aware of the problems that hinder the optimal performance of local governments, adding that numerous solutions have been proposed and debated extensively over the past decades.

    Fagbemi calls for scrapping of SIECS

    To deepen democracy at the grassroots,  Fagbemi called for the scrapping of SIECs.

    He said council elections have become a process of imposition and adoption, adding that no matter how bad the parties in power in the states perform, they always win all the local government elections.

    The minister also faulted the constitutional provisions on local government autonomy which did not give a clear provision of what the autonomy should be.

    He explained that local government, being the closest government to the people in a democratic setting, should be effective and efficient in the discharge of its responsibilities to the people.

    Fagbemi said the constitution made provisions for Local Government Authorities (LGA), the creation of new ones, and fiscal transfers from federation account and functions, adding that these provisions were made to safeguard a reasonable level of structural autonomy for local governments in achieving good governance.

    The minister said that despite the constitutional provisions that were meant to safeguard local governments’ autonomy, there have been cases of arbitrary dissolution, abolition or fragmentation of local governments by the higher tiers of government, particularly the state governments.

    He said the provision of the constitution under Section 162 (5-8) on State Joint Local Government Account, which empowers the House of Assembly to decide the revenue to their local government has led to the state’s encroachment on local revenues. 

    Fagbemi said cases of hijack of local government revenues by states abound from 1999 to date.

    He maintained that because of these weak constitutional provisions, the lifespan of the local government councils is at the mercy of the state governments.

    Fagbemi added: “There is no consistent pattern of local government elections. Some state governors dissolve their councils and appoint caretaker committees.”

    The minister said there were many cases of abuse of the Joint Account by state governments.

    “This has undermined the financial autonomy of the local government, as well as their ability to deliver on their statutory responsibilities,” he said.

    He stressed that under a true federal structure, the autonomy of local government is adequately guaranteed, adding that one of the persisting challenges of Nigeria’s federalism is the persistent failure to grant autonomy to local government as the third tier of government.

    Fagbemi said: “Although, the LGAs as the third tier of government in Nigeria and as enshrined in the constitution is ostensibly meant to serve as an institutional framework for effective service delivery to the grassroots and the overall national development; however, LGAs in Nigeria have been performing poorly in provision of essential services to the people due to absence of autonomy.

    “The 1999 Constitution did not provide adequately for the political autonomy of the local governments.

    “The resultant effects of these inadequacies are that the state governments have the discretion to determine the nature, content and direction of local government elections and political activities.

    “The failure of the constitution to articulate a clear line of authorities to both the state and local authorities and the continuing debate over the involvement of state governments in distributing local government allocation from the Federation Account has affected the capacity of LGAs to provide essential services at the grassroots.

    “Rather than function as a tier of government, LGAs have been operating as an appendage of the State governments in Nigeria. The constitutional provisions on State Joint Local Government Account (section 162 (5-8)) have placed the local government councils in a political bondage.

    “Politically, due to the flaws in the electoral process in the country, what is obtained is a virtual selection and not the election of local government functionaries. Local government chairmen are always imposed on the people by the governors.

    “This erodes the three elements of good governance at the local government level, which are citizens’ participation, transparency and accountability.

    “The imposed chairman will be accountable only to the governor rather than the people. This results in lack of transparency and non-involvement of the citizens.”

    Fagbemi said the absence of administrative and fiscal autonomy for LGAs created a dependency situation than the independent one conceptualised under a true federal system.

    He stressed: “The local governments in many instances have continued to suffer fiscal emasculation in the hands of state governments.

    “In all these unwholesome abuses, Sections 7 and 162 of the 1999 Constitution among others have been an escape route for many state governments to manipulate the local government and reduce same to a mere department in the governor’s office.

    “State joint local government account (SJLGA) has been the anti-development instrument used to frustrate every progressive and patriotic action to make the Local Government work since the return of the Country to democracy in 1999.

    “Good governance at any level of governance is not possible without the transfer of authority, responsibilities, capacity and resources. This is even more so for the LGAs.

    “Accordingly, constitutional reforms should, among other things, aim to: increase fiscal and administrative autonomy of local government system to enhance its effectiveness and efficiency; fiscal autonomy should be balanced with fiscal restraint by strengthening the internal controls system, processes and infrastructure for public financial management; ensure inclusiveness and citizens participation in the governance of LGAs and allow the legislative arms of local governments to decide what they should do with revenue accruing to them.”

    Kalu: failed councils, a recipe for violence

    Kalu said the failure of the local government system has fueled social unrest and violence, creating fertile ground for those who seek to exploit instability.

    Represented by the House Leader, Prof. Julius Ihonvbare, the Deputy Speaker said the near absence of a complete breakdown of governance at the local government level has created ungoverned spaces.

    He said these ungoverned spaces have been exploited by non-state actors, making life increasingly unbearable for the rural populace.

    He said: “This is a stark reminder of the urgent need for reform and revitalisation at the grassroots level.”

    Kalu lamented that the gaps in service delivery at the local government are wide while the people who need them most – rural citizens – are suffering.

    He said the escalating security challenges facing the country demand innovative solutions and candid discussions.

    Kalu stressed that Nigeria’s federal system, characterised by the distribution of responsibilities, powers, and resources among the federal, state, and local governments, is akin to a pyramid.

    He said: “At the base of this pyramid are the Local Government Councils (LGCs) entrusted with the crucial task of delivering basic municipal functions and ensuring that governance reaches the grassroots.

    “They are the first line of defence in our governance architecture, tackling communal, local, and grassroots challenges.

    “The local governments envisioned as the bedrock of our democracy, were meant to be the first responders to the needs of the people.

    “Think of them as the foot soldiers in the fight for development, the ones ensuring that the fruits of our independence reached every corner of the nation.

    “However, history often takes unexpected turns. Like a once-mighty warrior whose shield has grown rusty, our local governance system has faltered.

    “The gaps in service delivery are wide, and the very people who need them most – our rural citizens – are suffering.

    “This, in turn, has fueled social unrest and violence, creating fertile ground for those who seek to exploit instability.

    “As many political analysts and development experts have noted, the near absence or complete breakdown of governance at the local level has created ungoverned spaces.

    “These spaces have been exploited by non-state actors, making life increasingly unbearable for our rural populace. This is a stark reminder of the urgent need for reform and revitalisation at the grassroots level.

    “Efforts to address these issues through constitutional amendments by the seventh, eighth, and ninth National Assemblies were not successful.

    “Various reasons have been cited for these failures, but what remains clear is that the situation has continued to deteriorate without effective alternative measures being put in place.

    “The debate on state police, a topic on many minds, is a positive step. But security is just one piece of the puzzle.

    “A strong local government, delivering essential services and fostering a sense of community, is the best defence against any threat.

    “This national dialogue is our opportunity to come together, just like our founding fathers did.

    “Let us identify the challenges that cripple our local governments, from inadequate funding to a lack of autonomy.

    “Let us learn from other nations, those who have successfully empowered their grassroots”.

  • The quest for council autonomy

    The quest for council autonomy

    The announcement by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Senator George Akume, that President Bola Tinubu is backing the clamour for local government autonomy offers an elixir of hope for the grassroots crusaders.

    Autonomy implies that the local governments will have the liberty to independently exercise authority with the backing of the law and the constitution. It means the power and liberty to effectively and efficiently discharge constitutionally assigned responsibilities without undue interference, restraint or control by either the federal or state authorities.

    The road treaded to get to this destination has been tortuous. Efforts to review the constitution to grant autonomy to the local governments have been resisted by state authorities. Although residual powers are devolved in the councils, which underscores a degree of decentralisation in federalism, states that complain about the Federal Government’s enlarged and intimidating powers and spheres of influence object to a greater degree of autonomy that may severe the state/council cords.

    The local government system, without doubt, is in a fix. Many councils are impoverished. They can hardly perform their constitutional duties of serving the people at the grassroots, although they are the closest unit of administration to the people.

    However, opinion is divided on the agitation for autonomy. While council functionaries believe that financial independence will liberate the fledgling local governments from the jaws of power-loaded governors, the governors believe that when local governments are removed from the direct control of the states, what remains of the sub-national level is a carcass.

    Read Also: Five Northern monarchs deposed in Nigeria

    The argument of governors is that the Nigerian brand of federalism only recognises two tiers -the general, federal, national or central government, and the states, which are coordinate with the somehow distant but powerful central government.

    Today, there is duality of financial controls over the councils. While the Federal Government allocates funds to state/local government joint account, the state reserves the power on the mode of distribution. The reason given by the state is that councils are created by the House of Assembly for ease of administration at the local level. To that extent, the local units of administration are an extension of the state.

    The local governments are listed in the 1999 Constitution. But the constitution also affirms the right of the state parliament to exercise political control over the local governments. This includes the supervision and scrutiny of its financial books and discipline of elected chairmen through suspension from office.

    The local government system is beset by many challenges. There are concerns about democratisation, operational efficiency, capacity for performance, competence of administrative and technical staff, service delivery, and corruption.

    While council chairmen, councillors and workers intensify their demand for autonomy, because of the desire for improved funding and independence from state authorities, many council helmsmen have not shown capacity for prudent spending.

    Although the constitution provides that democratically elected councils are fully guaranteed, many local governments are still being run by caretaker committees appointed by governors. Even in councils where there is a semblance of an election, many chairmen and councillors are not popularly elected.

    The Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, put this into perspective when he said the State Independent Electoral Commission (SIEC) has become a tool for coronation of governors’ preferred candidates as chairmen and councillors.

    Indeed, governors believe that elected grassroots operators should automatically become a part of their personal political structures. The strategy is to nurture them ahead of electioneering and deploy them as agents of grassroots mobilisation. Those chairmen who fall out of favour are removed or the council is dissolved.

    A governor appoints his cronies into SIECs. Those appointed are mostly card-carrying members of the ruling party. Opposition parties become livid because the umpire is perceived as biased. Predictably, the ruling party, under the governor, who is the party’s State Leader, produces all the chairmen and councillors.

    The political bureaucracy is not supported by competent council workers in many councils. Council engineers are seen as quacks who are unknown to COREN and council accountants and treasurers lack ICAN professional certification.

    Service delivery is also at a low ebb. In some states, councils lack capacity to discharge the duties of refuse collection and environmental sanitation. The states take over the respinsibility. Unlike in the glorious days of Lagos Town Council when the local Works Department, with its heavy equipment-grader and caterpillars-constructed roads that rivaled state and federal roads, many councils across the country nowadays are shadows. Their workers are poorly trained and ill-motivated. Also, many councillors see their positions as employment, empowerment or merely as rewards for political involvement.

    Council chairmen are attacked on two fronts where they cannot resist pressures. While some of them complain about illegal deductions of council funds by their governors, they are also at the mercy of local party chieftains and godfathers who demand unearned salaries as reward for sponsorship or political support. A council chairman once told reporters that not less than 120 local politicians were on the council’s unofficial payroll. Failure to honour the imposed monthly financial obligations could be a recipe for crisis.

    In states where governors are performing, they are drawn back by inept council chairmen who cannot replicate their feats at the councils. The complaints about dubious deductions are justifiable. But, how have the council chairmen judiciously utilised the scarce resources at their disposal?

    There are 774 local governments. All of them were created by successive military regimes. Their distribution is skewed or lopsided. The criterion was not equity. As the elite won the battles for the creation of more states for the purpose enhancing development and securing more access to state resources, state creation paved the way for local government creation, not on the basis of equity but on expediency. It led to the preservation of identity in some areas. In other states, diverse people were lumped together in many councils, particularly in highly heterogeneous areas, where they have continued their acrimonious relationship.

    Some council chairmen behave as local governors who have turned their councils into a bastion of corruption through their ostentatious lifestyles and primitive accumulation. Whenever there is crisis between the chairmen and councillors who threaten them with impeachment, the bone of contention is not about the developmental agenda of the council, but misunderstanding over the formula for the distribution of the largesse.

    That is not what the local government should stand for. Local government should stand for efficient service delivery in education, health, environment, markets, and mobilisation of traditional rulers and other vital community resources for intelligence gathering for the purpose of ensuring security.

    Also, the local government exists to deepen democracy in the countryside. It is meant to democratically throw up community men who know the environment, its prospects and challenges, and who are ready to serve the people with patriotism. The council is expected to be the intermediary between the state government and the people at the grassroots. The feedback on the efficacy of state government programmes can be collated at the local government level for the purpose of refocusing and improving the quality of project implementation.

    Besides, the local government is expected to be a training ground for future leaders. The assumption is that an elected public official who begins his political and public service career is in a vantage position to acquire wide-ranging experiences about governance, political mobilisation and management of human and material resources.

    Indeed, early leaders, including Chief Obafemi Awolowo and Alhaji Ahmadu Bello, began their illustrious political careers as councillors before they moved to the parliament where they later became regional ministers and premiers.

    More importantly, local governments should be accountable to the grassroots they are meant to serve. They should be run in a transparent manner and the people should have a sense of ownership and belonging through the people-oriented projects and programmes implemented by councils.

    Historically, there was never a time that councils existed independently of regions and states. But past regional or state authorities ensured that councils were positioned to attend to peculiar and local needs of the communities within the limit of available resources.

    Many reforms have been carried out in a bid to reposition the local government system in Nigeria. In 1976, the secretary became the council’s accounting officer, following the adoption of the Etsu Nupe Committee reforms. The chairmanship was largely ceremonial. But, in 1980s, the Babangida regime introduced the presidential system and the chairmen assumed full executive powers.

    The reforms never obliterated the subordinate status of the local government in the Nigerian federation. It has never been perceived as the third tier.

    Here lies the dilemma. Councils are appendages of the states, the only sub-national units that are partners in the federation. They derive their existence and powers from the law enacted by the House of Assembly.

    There is a need for more debates and dialogues among stakeholders for the purpose of arriving at a consensus that would be critical to the envisaged constitutional review that may lead to the realisation of the latent dream for local government autonomy.

  • NULGE: only nine states voted for Council autonomy

    NULGE: only nine states voted for Council autonomy

    The Nigeria Union of Local Government Employees (NULGE) said only nine states voted in support of Local Government autonomy in the ongoing effort to amend the constitution.

    National President of the Union Ibrahim Khaleel said two states rejected the bill outright

    Khaleel called for the abolition of State Independent Electoral Commission, adding that the existence of the commission had made democracy at the local government level a mockery.

    Khaleel  said Kwara, Benue, Niger, Plateau, Bauchi, Cross River, Bayelsa, Ogun and Ondo are the states, which endorsed the local government autonomy bill, while Edo and Imo  rejected it outright.

    He said governors influenced their state assemblies to defeat its consideration.

    He urged the states  to approve the bill in the interest of Nigerians.

    He said   the union was not asking legislators to automatically endorse the bill, but to conduct public hearing as agreed by the Speakers Forum and the Governors Forum.

    “I want to call on our governors to, as a matter of respect for Nigerian citizens who have spoken and aspiring to have a local government system they can call their own, that will be free for them to participate democratically by electing their Chairmen and Councillors as and when due without undue influence from the government of the state.

    “The governors should begin to have some level of decorum in their approach to governance. Look at the shame brought to bear on our democracy by the election in Kano where under aged were the ones that mostly voted.

    “These are some of the issues that we have been trying to make Nigerians understand. That is not only in the area of democracy.

    “The idea behind establishing local government is by way of bringing governance closer to the people and providing a platform for everybody to participate at his own community level.”