Tag: Court of Appeal

  • Judiciary: Corruption, inefficiency killing system

    Judiciary: Corruption, inefficiency killing system

    The Special Assistant to the President on Prosecution, Chief Okoi Obono-Obla, said on Monday a case he filed at the Supreme Court 10 years ago is yet to be assigned a date for hearing due to corruption and inefficiency.

    He said lawyers and litigants “pay through their noses” to have cases assigned or court papers served.

    The judiciary, he said, was averse to reform and should learn from the Kenyan example where every stakeholder worked towards an efficient justice system.

    Obono-Obla, in a statement, said: “Why is the judicial system in Nigeria adverse to change? Look at Kenya and how it has reformed its own system!

    “See how effective and efficient the judiciary is in Kenya. See how audacious, bold, courageous and fearless judges in Kenya are.

    “See how an election petition was heard within dispatch just three weeks after it was filed.  See how lawyers work together with the bench to deliver a landmark judgment.

    “In Nigeria lawyers would devise all manners of legal maneuverings steeped in crass legal technicalities to frustrate justice. The judgment would be leaked several weeks before delivery,” he said.

    According to him, the appellate courts are chaotic and have refused to adopt technology despite increased funding.

    “Before I was given an appointment while in law practice, I have appeals I have filed in the Court of Appeal for the past six years but till now have not been heard. I also have several appeals I filed in the Supreme Court since 2007 till now no date have been given for hearing of these appeals.

    “To obtain a court ruling you must pay through your nose; to obtain a certified true copy of judgment you must pay through nose; to cause a court bailiff to serve a court process you must pay through your nose.

    “To get a case to be assigned after filing you must pay through your nose. Even in the Supreme Court to get an appeal to be assigned for hearing you must pay through your nose.

    “The registries in the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court respectively are a study in chaos, disorderliness and confusion. They have refused to embrace Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to organize their registry in line with international best practices,” he said.

     

  • Appeal Court reinstates Oye as APGA national chairman

    Appeal Court reinstates Oye as APGA national chairman

    The Court of Appeal Siting in Enugu Wednesday upturned the judgement of an Enugu State High Court that sacked Victor Oye as the National Chairman of the All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA).

    An Enugu High Court presided over by Justice A.R Ozoemena had ordered the removal of the national chairman of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), Victor Oye and replaced him with Chief Martin Agbaso.

    The judge ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to stop further dealings with Oye.

    The action of the lower court followed a suit by the Secretary of the party in Enugu State, Comrade Mike Alioke, who challenged the continued occupation of Oye in office after the National Working Committee (NWC) of the party affirmed his suspension on October 5, last year.

    But, delivering judgement on an appeal brought against the judgment of the lower court, the appellate court presided by Justice Abdul Aboki quashed the judgment of the lower court.

    The judge declared that the Appeal succeeded in its merit and declared Oye as the authentic chairman.

     

  • Independence Day bombing: Appeal Court upholds life sentence for Ebiware

    Independence Day bombing: Appeal Court upholds life sentence for Ebiware

    …Affirms the sentencing of a woman to death by hanging

     

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja has upheld the conviction and life sentence handed to Edmond Ebiware over his complicity in the October 1, 2010 bomb explosion around Eagle Square in Abuja which left about 12 people dead and several others injured.

    In a unanimous judgment of a panel of three, the appellate court resolved the two issues, identified for resolution, in favour of the state, listed as respondent, and dismissed the appeal by Ebiware.

    In a separate judgment, the court affirmed the sentencing of 31-year-old Ozioma Azoryeme to death by hanging following her conviction for the murder of a female child of about two years old.

    Ebiware, accused of withholding information about alleged plot by Henry Okah to cause bomb explosion in Abuja, was initially charged, with three persons, including Charles Okah on an eight-count charge filed on January 11, 2011 before the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    On May 3, 2012, the trial judge, Justice Gabriel Kolawole granted Ebiware’s application to be tried separately from the three others.

    At the end of the trial, Justice Kolawole, in a judgment on January 25, 2013 convicted Ebiware and sentenced him to life imprisonment, subject to parole after 32 years from the date of the convict’s arrest on October 15, 2010, a decision he appealed.

    In a lead judgment delivered on July 25, 2017 by Justice Mohammed Mustapha, a copy of which The Nation sighted Monday, it was held that the trial court was in order in its findings and conclusions in the Ebiware case.

    On whether the prosecution proved the charges against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt, Justice Mustapha held that, by the evidence led, the prosecution proved the guilt of the defendant/appellant.

    Justice Mustapha said: “Contrary to the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant, conviction under Section 40(b) of the Criminal Code does not require linkage with other accused person(s), the operative word is ‘knowledge of intention,’ and failure to report to the categories of persons listed therein.

    @The appellant, from evidence at trial, not only knew, but failed to report. The findings of the trial court are beyond reproach in this regard.”

    On Ebiware’s contention that the sentence of life imprisonment was too harsh, Justice Mustapha held that, considering the impact of the bomb explosion and its impact, the sentence handed by Justice Kolawole to the appellant was justifiable.

    He said: “I did say earlier that the question of whether the sentence is harsh or not is subjective, because it depends on who is at the receiving side; this is because at the end of the day, when all is said and done, neither life imprisonment nor any sentence can be regarded as sufficient punishment for an action that leads to loss of innocent lives in this grand scale.

    “This is not withstanding the fact that the accused had remained in prison custody, married with children or chose not to waste precious time by opting for a separate trial from other co-accused,” Justice Mustapha said.

    Justices Tani Yusuf Hassan and Abubakar Datti Yahaya, who were on the panel, agreed with the lead judgment in the Ebiware case.

    On the appeal by Azoryeme, Justice Yahaya, in a lead judgment delivered on August 2, 2017, resolved the two issues, identified for determination, against the appellant and dismissed the appeal for lacking in merit.

    As against the appellant contention that there were insufficient to warrant her conviction, Justice Yahaya held that the prosecution effectively discharged the burden of proving, beyond reasonable doubt, the guilt of the appellant for the offence od culpable homicide punishable with death, for with which she was charged.

    On whether the trial court was right not to have upheld the appellant’s defence of insanity, Justice Yahaya upheld the position of the trial court, to the effect that the claim of insanity was not only an afterthought, it was not supported by credible material evidence, in the form of medical reports.

    Justices Tani Yusuf Hassan and Muhammed Mustapha agreed with Justice Yahaya’s lead judgment.

    Azoryeme was arraigned in 2011 in a charge marked: NSHC/SD/IC/2011, before a High Court of Niger State in Suleja for the killing, on June 12, 2010, of Chinonye Timothy (a child of about two years old).

    The trial court, in a judgment on September 30, 2014 found her guilty and sentenced her to death by hanging.

     

  • Appeal Court dismisses Akeredolu’s appeal

    Appeal Court dismisses Akeredolu’s appeal

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja has dismissed an appeal filed by Ondo State Governor, Oluwarotimi Akeredolu.

    Akeredolu had, by the appeal, challenged an order by a Federal High Court in Abuja, granting permission to Olusegun Abraham to serve Akeredolu through substituted means, court documents in relation to the suit he (Abraham) filed.

    Abraham’s suit is challenging the outcome of the primary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), which produced Akeredolu as the party’s candidate for the last governorship election in Ondo State.

    The Court of Appeal, in a unanimous judgment yesterday, upheld the ruling of the Federal High Court, grabting leave to Abraham to serve Akeredolu thorugh substituted means.

    Justive Abdu Aboki, in the lead judgment, said the lower court was right in ordering substituted service on Akeredolu through the headquarter of the APC.

    He also considered as proper service the decision of the court to allow Abraham serve the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) through its headquarters in Abuja.

    Akeredolu’s appeal was against the ruling by the Federal High Court delivered on December 16, 2016 granting leave to Abraham to effect service through substituted means on the defendants.
    Reacting to the judgment yesterday, Abraham’s lawyer, Johnson Usman expressed delight over the court’s decision.

    He said the verdict of the court will afford his client the opportunity to expose the irregularities in the APC primary election.

    Usman said the coast is now clear for his client to prove, through his case, that  the September 3, 2016 primary election of the APC that produced Akeredolu as the party’s candidate was marred with irregularities.

    Lawyer to Akeredolu, Oluseyi Adetanmi said he will consult with his client before deciding on what further steps to take.

    Proceedings in the substantive case before the Federal High Court, Abuja has been adjourned indefinitely to await the outcome of Akeredolu’s appeal.

    Abraham, who was the first runner up in the primary election, is praying the court for among others, an order nullifying Akeredolu’s election

  • Ondo APC Primary Court Ruling: Democracy at work – Abraham

    Ondo APC Primary Court Ruling: Democracy at work – Abraham

    The first runner-up in the last governorship primary of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ondo State, Segun Abraham, Monday hailed the ruling of the Appeal Court that dismissed the application for stay of court’s proceedings filed by Governor Oluwarotimi Akeredolu.

    The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja had on Monday dismissed the application for stay of court’s proceedings filed by the governor against his candidature in the last governorship primaries of the party in the state.

    Abraham in a statement in Akure,the state capital signed by the Director General, Abraham Support Group(ASG) Kunle Eko-Davies described the ruling as a “quit notice” to the governor and his supporters.

    It noted that the ruling was a clear sign that democracy is strengthening and more people oriented, stressing that “the ruling is a victory for all members of APC locally and in diaspora most especially the “disenfranchised members in the state.

    According to the statement, “The events leading to the 2015 Ondo state APC primaries is still fresh in our memories. The unilateral act of our party National Chairman to submit the name of Akeredolu as the candidate of the party contrary to the decision of the party’s Appeal Committee and National Working Committee is also fresh in our memories.

    “This is a quit notice to Governor Akeredolu and his members to vacate the state house that was acquired illegally.”

    It however appealed to all members of the ruling party and supporters alike to remain calm and be prayerful, saying it is a family issue that would soon be resolved by courts.

  • Appeal Court resolves Obaship tussle in Akoko Community

    Appeal Court resolves Obaship tussle in Akoko Community

    The Court of Appeal sitting in Akure, Ondo State capital, has resolved the protracted obaship tussle between the rival Owa-Ale of Ikare and the Olukare of Ikare in Akoko North East local government area of Ondo State.

    It struck out a suit filed against the recognition of Owa-Ale, Oba kolapo Adegbite-Adedoyin as a traditional ruler in the ancient town.

    The Appellate court panel led by Justice Obande Ogbuinya ruled that the appeal A/AK/103/2011 instituted by the Olukare, Oba Akadiri Saliu-Momoh and five members of his family against Owa-Ale and the Ondo state government“ lacked merit, an abuse of judicial process and the case was status barred”.

    The unanimous court’s judgement read by Justice Danjuma held that Olukare lacked legal ground to challenge the Chieftaincy Status of Owa-Ale as a monarch in Ikare, considering various laws such as the Public Officers Protection Law, Cap 103, Volume 5, Law of Ondo state 1978 and Section 4(1a) of the Limitation Laws Cap 61, Laws of Ondo state 1978.

    The Appeal Court subsequently resolved three issues raised by the appellants for determination in favour of the three respondents- Owa-Ale, State Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice as well as the State Commissioner for Local government and Chieftaincy Affairs.

    The trial judge, Justice D.I. Kolawole of the Ondo state High Court in Akure had on July 26, 2011 held in a Suit No: Ak/260/2010, that the case was an abuse of court process, status barred and that the court lacked the jurisdiction to entertain the suit.

    The Appellants through their lawyer, Dele Adesina(SAN)had filed the appeal against the verdict of the state High court, praying the Appeal court to declare Owa-Ale Chieftaincy as illegal and to compel the state government to stop recognizing as a monarch in Ikare-Akoko.

    In their counter arguments, Counsel to the State Attorney General, the State Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Mr Akeredolu and the Lead Counsel to Owa-Ale, Olawale Ijatuyi had urged the appellate court to dismiss the appeal since similar case had been resolved in favour of Oba Adedoyin in 2009.

    The Defendants Counsels also argued that Owa-Ale was recognised under the 1976 Chieftaincy Law, in the judgments of the state High Court in Suit No: AK/43/81 and AK/171/2007 while the 1999 white Paper on the Report of Justice Adeloye Commission also listed “Owa-Ale” title among recognised Obas in Ondo State.

  • Judge withdraws from Patience Jonathan’s appeal ‘for personal reasons’

    Judge withdraws from Patience Jonathan’s appeal ‘for personal reasons’

    …Appeal Court adjourns till September 18

     

    The Court of Appeal, Lagos Division Wednesday failed to hear an appeal by the wife of former President Goodluck Jonathan, Patience, seeking to stop the forfeiture of her $5.7million and N2, 421,953,522.78 to the Federal Government.

    One of the three-man panel, the appellate court said, was recusing himself from hearing the appeal “for personal reasons.

    It did not state which of the justices were withdrawing and what the reasons were.

    Justice John Ikyeh, who presided over the appeal alongside Justices Abimbola Obaseki and Abrahim Georgewill, noted that three judges were required to form a quorum.

    It adjourned till September 18 for hearing.

    Mrs Patience’s appeal arose from an order obtained by the EFCC last April 26, from the Federal High Court in Lagos, temporarily forfeiting the cash to the government.

    The commission told Justice Mojisola Olatoregun, who made the order, that the funds were suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities.

    It said the N5.7m was part of the $6,791,599.64 (about N2.1billion) which Mrs Jonathan allegedly directed her aides to pay into her account between February 8, 2013 and January 30, 2015, while her husband was President.

    Mrs. Jonathan, the commission said, had earlier spent $949, 282.98 (about N296, 141,911) from the money.

    It said she also withdrew another $100,000 from the account in April, leaving a balance of $5,731,173.55.

    Justice Olatoregun also ordered the temporary forfeiture of the N2, 421,953,522.78 found in an Ecobank Nigeria Ltd account numbered 2022000760 in the name of La Wari Furniture and Baths Ltd.

    The commission said the money also belongs to Mrs Jonathan.

     

  • A’Court reserves ruling on Metuh’s request for Dasuki as witness

    A’Court reserves ruling on Metuh’s request for Dasuki as witness

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja has reserved ruling in an interlocutory appeal filed by the former National Publicity Secretary of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Chief Olisa Metuh.

    Metuh is by the appeal, challenging the refusal of the Federal High Court, Abuja to issue a subpoena on a former National Security Adviser (NSA), Sambo Dasuki to appear in court to testify as defence witness in his (Metuh’s) trial.

    The ex-PDP spokesman is being tried before the Federal High Court in Abuja on allegation of unlawfully receiving N400m form Dasuki and allegedly engaging in money laundering.

    Metuh, who is currently conducting his defence in the case, had applied to the court for a subpoena on Dasuki to testify for him (Metuh), a request the trial judge, Justice Okon Abang rejected.

    Justice Abang, in a ruling, said Dasuki was not a compellable witness and asked Metuh to seeks other ways of getting the DSS to produce Dasuki to testify for him.

    In his appeal, Metuh wants among others, that Justice Abang be set aside.

    Metuh said he approached the trial court to issue the subpoena on Dasuki because of his inability to get the Department of State Services (DSS) to produce Dasuki to no avail, after several efforts.

    He said the appearance and testimony of Dasuki were crucial for the establishment of the justice of the case.

    Wednesday, a three-man panel of the Court of Appeal, Abuja entertained arguments from Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN) for Metuh and Sylvanus Tahir (for the state) in relation to the appeal, following which the court reserved ruling and promised to informed parties when the ruling was ready.

  • How NJC shields corrupt judges, by presidential adviser

    How NJC shields corrupt judges, by presidential adviser

    …Litigants now bypass lawyers to see judges directly

     

    Special Adviser to the President on Prosecution, Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr. Okoi Obono-Obla, has accused the National Judicial Council (NJC) of shielding corrupt judges.

    He said the NJC “descends heavily” on judges who have no godfathers or connection, but leaves judges known to be corrupt on the bench because of their family history and other considerations.

    Obono-Obla said corruption has become so rife in the judiciary that some litigants approach judges directly, bypassing their lawyers.

    He said a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) once confided him that that lawyers’ income was dropping because litigants prefer to go to judges directly.

    The presidential spoke in an interview with our correspondent in office in Abuja.

    Obono-Obla disagreed with those who complain about loss of high profile cases.

    He said critics should wait until all the cases have been decided by the Supreme Court.

    Obono-Obla said he agreed with the view expressed by Prof Itse Sagay (SAN) that the NJC was working against the anti-corruption crusade.

    “I support Prof Sagay’s position. There is no doubt about it. We’re not saying that if we take people to court, if there’s no evidence you should convict them. Just do the right thing. We hear a lot of stories. We have eyes. We know the system. I have practiced law for over 20 years. I know how the system works. We know the judges who are bad. It’s not all the judges who are bad. We know the bad ones.

    “NJC is not doing enough. If they’re doing enough, all judges that have undergone criminal investigation, that have allegedly collected money from lawyers, they should make a list of them and send to Mr President, and recommend their retirement from the Bench. And they should stop protecting some judges,” he said.

    Obono-Obla said several complaints have been taken to the NJC without being treated.

    He said judges who were expected to be sanctioned because of the severity of their offence were merely warned and placed on a “watchlist”.

    “We have taken complaints to NJC and they don’t want to handle them. Let me give you an instance. We reported a judge of the Rivers State High Court to the NJC. We got a petition from a woman who was elected a member of the River State House of Assembly under the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    “Her opponent challenged her case. He went to the tribunal and lost. He appealed and lost. The Court of Appeal ordered that a certificate of return should be issued to her. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) issued a certificate of return to her.

    “Her opponent went to the Rivers State High Court to file a lawsuit against her. The judge issued an ex-parte order restraining her from taking her sit for one year. For one year, she was not allowed to be inaugurated in the Rivers State House of Assembly.

    “We petitioned against the judge as to why he should dabble into an election matter that the Court of Appeal had given a final judgment on.

    “National Assembly election petition cases terminate at the Court of Appeal, so any judge who is knowledgeable, who has integrity should know that he should not issue an ex-parte order to restrain somebody who has been elected and gone through the litigation process to the end.

    “Do you know what NJC did? It said that judge should be warned. And that he’s in their watch-list,” Obono-Obla said.

    He recalled that NJC once warned a judge in Akwa Ibom who restrained anti-graft agencies from arresting a former governor and placed him on a watchlist, but retired a judge who committed a lesser offence.

    “So, you see the inconsistency of the NJC,” he said.

    He called for a reform of the NJC, saying it was not objective in handling corruption cases against judges.

    Obono-Obla said: “I’ve expressed the view that you cannot be a judge in your own cause. That is a fundamental principle of the law of natural justice. Why should judges be the judges of judges? NJC should be made up of members of the civil society. They don’t need to be judges. They don’t need to be lawyers. We have a lot of members of the civil society who are people with integrity. They can look at complaints against a judge dispassionately and objectively.

    “We see them (NJC) trying to protect some classes of judges. Some because their parents or grand-parents were eminent jurists, their grand-fathers were Chief Justices of Nigeria, their fathers were at the Court of Appeal, then they’re seen as a children of the judiciary, then they have to protect them.

    “But if another judge who does not have that sort of pedigree commits an offence, they will descend heavily on that judge. We have seen it. That is why we have a lot of judges who have misbehaved but have become ‘institutions’.

    “A friend of mine who is a SAN filed a complaint against a senior judge of Federal High Court. He was very certain NJC would retire the judge. But the judge was exonerated. And the judge has dirty records. We know them.

    “Lawyers know them but they’re afraid to speak out because they fear judges will punish them or not give them good recommendation. But we have to change the system, because lawyers are no longer making money.

    “An SAN told me: ‘We may not come out and clap for you (the Federal Government). But we’re very happy with what you’re doing to cleanse the judiciary. As a SAN, I cannot pay my bills. Litigants don’t come to us again. They prefer to go to judges directly.

    “In the past, judges will not allow a politician to visit them and begin to discuss pending cases. But now you see Supreme Court justices allowing politicians to come and discuss cases before them. And they will not order their arrest?”

     

  • Judiciary, everybody’s hope – Justice Danjuma

    Judiciary, everybody’s hope – Justice Danjuma

    Justice Mohammad Danjuma of the Court of Appeal, Akure, has described the judiciary as the hope of everybody and not just a “utopian common man”.

    Danjuma stated this on Saturday at the 2016 and 2017 Valedictory service for graduating students of the Igbinedion University in Okada, Ovia North East Local Government Council of Edo.

    He said the role of the judiciary was to take decisions that would ensure the advancement of human rights in furtherance of the rule of law.

    Delivering a lecture on `The Judiciary as the last hope of the common man: A reality’, Danjuma said the judiciary had been identified with the rule of law and the strength of character and integrity that determine the capacity to adjudicate justice without fear or favour.

    He explained that the role of the judiciary was not governed by emotions, adding that sentiments had no place in law.

    He stressed that the judiciary had a role to play to all Nigerians, to ensure that remedy was served, adding that it was, therefore, wrong to ask ” if the judiciary was the last hope of the common man”?

    The Appeal Court judge said that it was the duty of the Court to do all it could in order not to defeat the aim of justice.

    “The Judiciary is not an oppressor but will evenly and dispassionately serve all.

    “Misconception is in most cases usually drawn concerning the judiciary by the masses.

    He, therefore, urged the graduating students to always stand neutral and not be intimidated by what he called ” utopian common man”.

    He also said the contention that there was “a common man” somewhere was wrong.

    Earlier, the Vice-Chancellor of the institution, Prof. Eghosa Osaghae, had said the College of Law of the institution was a flagship and a foundation college of the institution.

    Osaghae said the graduating students should remain bonafide ambassadors of the institution and continue to maintain the high standard of the institution.

    He gave assurance that the management of the institution would do its best possible to ensure that all the graduating students were admitted into law school.

    The Dean of the College, Prof. Rashidi Ijaodola, who said the valedictory service was an annual event at the institution, urged the students to be prepared at all times.