Tag: Court

  • EFCC to court: dismiss Jonathan’s ex-aide Dudafa’s no-case submission

    THE Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday urged the Federal High Court in Lagos to order ex-President Goodluck Jonathan’s former aide, Dr. Waripamo-Owei Dudafa, to open his defence.

    The anti-graft agency prayed the court to dismiss the no-case submissions filed by Dudafa and his co-accused, Mr. Iwejuo Joseph Nna, a banker.

    EFCC arraigned them before Justice Mohammed Idris on 23-counts of conspiracy to conceal proceeds of crime amounting to over N1.6 billion on June 11, 2013.

    The prosecution closed its case on March 16, but the defendants opted to make a no-case submission.

    Moving the applications, defence counsel Gboyega Oyewole (SAN) (for Dudafa) and Ige Asemudara urged the court to discharge and acquit their clients as the evidence led by the prosecution did not indict them.

    “We urge your lordship to hold that no case has been made out against the first defendant to warrant his being asked to enter a defence,” Oyewole said.

    The SAN said the money Dudafa was accused of laundering was given to him by his bosses, adding that there was no evidence that the funds were stolen.

    “The first defendant has stated the source of the money. He was an aide. And there is nothing to show that the money came from a criminal source,” Oyewole said.

    Asemudara faulted the prosecution’s claim that the money was allegedly obtained from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) based on an instruction letter by former National Security Adviser (NSA) Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd).

    “Nothing was tendered showing that the money Dasuki requested left the CBN. There must be a debit note to show that the money left. In the absence of that, it cannot be said that there was a crime,” he said.

    Besides, Asemudara said his client, a bank branch manager in Yenegoa, the Bayelsa State capital, had no link with the companies in whose accounts the money was kept.

    “These monies were in the ordinary books of the bank and were not hidden under a pillow. If indeed there was concealment, it must be by the bank and not the branch manager who is an employee.

    “The accounts were accessible and so the issue of concealment could not have arisen. We urge your Lordship to discharge the second defendant on all the counts,” Asemudara said.

    But, prosecuting counsel Nnaemeka Omenwa argued that the prosecution, through its seven witnesses and exhibits tendered, made out a prima facie case against the defendants to require them to enter their defence.

    He said there was evidence that Dudafa asked Nna to raise drafts in respect of the monies, adding that it was Nna who signed on the companies’ accounts using fictitious names.

    “The evidence on record shows clearly that the first defendant was appointed by the Federal Government as the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Domestic/Household and Social Events between 2012 and 2015.

    “The evidence on record shows that in the course of this service, huge sums of money, which are not the first defendant’s salary and allowances, were traced to the accounts, which he procured the second defendant to open, maintain and operate in fictitious names.

    “The second defendant, who at the material time was the Branch Manager in Yenogoa branch of Heritage Bank, acceded to the request of the first defendant and agreed with him to conceal these funds in the accounts opened in the name of Seagate Property Development and Investment Ltd, Avalon Global Property Development Company Ltd, Ebiwise Resources, Pluto Property and Investment Company Ltd, Rotato Interlink Services Ltd and De Jakes Fast Food and Restaurant Nigeria Ltd.”

    EFCC said the evidence on record established a prima facie case that the funds were received in foreign currencies from Dudafa by Murtala Bashir Abubakar through the state house staff and that Abubakar thereafter converted the currencies to naira and credited the accounts nominated by Dudafa “in grand conspiracy with the second defendant.”

    “We, therefore, urge my lord to hold that the prosecution has made out a case of conspiracy against the defendants as alleged in counts 1,” EFCC said.

    Justice Idris adjourned till July 6 for ruling on the no-case submission.

     

     

  • Court dismisses suit challenging Oluwa of Lagos’ installation

    Justice Babajude Candide Johnson of an Ikeja High Court has dismissed a N5 million suit challenging the installation of the Oluwa of Lagos, Chief Mukaila Kolawole Oluwa.

    The court said the suit was “an abuse of court process that call for dismissal”.

    Three contestants to the Oluwa stool were Prince Ismail Abayomi Oluwa, Prince Samsideen Akibo Oluwa and Prince Tajudeen Ototo Oluwa.

    Aside from Chief Oluwa, the other defendant in the suit is the  Attorney-General of Lagos State who were sued as co-defendants.

    The decision of the court has paved the way for continuation of processes leading to the  upgrade of the stool of Oluwa to Obaship, which had been stalled by litigation.

    Justice Candide-Johnson frowned at the attempt by counsel to the claimants to usurp the function of the court by relying on “Bryne Garners deep issue format” rather than conjuring jurisprudential questions for the court to deliberate and determine, make neutral finding and arrive at independent judicial conclusions.

    The judge described the suit as an abuse of court process, noting that there had been a plethora of previous litigations spanning decades which had been resolved.

    “The claimants clearly ‘re-litigated what is res judicata and/or cause of action estoppels”, he held.

    He noted that the ruling houses in the Oluwa Chieftaincy family are five and not four as claimed by the claimants and that the issue had been settled in various judgments delivered by Justice Olusola Thomas, in suit No. LD/826/70, Justice L. G. A. Marsh in LD/4420/94, and Justice Olufun-milayo Atilade  in suit LD/353/2000.

    “Those judgments as far back as 1970, about 47 years ago, have unequivocally held that there are actually five not four branches of the Oluwa Chieftaincy family which are (1) Asalu, Odofin, Idewu,  Faro and Amore” as against the houses pleaded by the claimants: Idewu, Adogia, Amore, Faro and Asalu.

    Justice Candide-Johnson further observed that the claimants legal strategy in this new suit is to say that there are five branches but noted that there are good reasons to exclude a particular branch from an entitlement to fill a vacancy in the Oluwa Chieftaincy Family.

    “This arguably is why there are issues revolving around the allegation that this present first defendant, Chief Mukaila Kolawole Oluwa, is from Abatan Compound inhabited by shrines and settled Arotas (slaves) and that there is a distinction between Odofin and Odofin Oyejo.

    “When I read the judgments in ID/826/70 and LD/4420/94, it is obvious that it is now too late and an abuse of court process for other branches of Oluwa Chieftaincy Family to continually explore avenues to re-litigate issues that have been effectually resolved with finality in the high court of Lagos State”.

    According to the judge, if the claimants believed they had a genuine argument that the reigning Oluwa came from Odofin Oyejo, which is non-existent, and not Odofin branch of the Oluwa Chieftaincy, they should have gone to the extent of carrying out DNA blood test to determine the paternity of the defendant, Chief Mukaila Kolawole Oluwa, that he is rather of Arota (slaves) stock from Abatan Compound.

    “I note with all seriousness that there is no DNA blood test produced nor initiated by order of court which this court would have been disposed to grant, if claimants had applied. In this technological 21st Century there are very precise scientific ways to determine paternity and genealogy especially with the Forensic Labs now available in Lagos State and around the world”, he said.

    According to the judge, the claimants’arguments that the Oluwa of Lagos came from Abatan Compound which was being used to roast oysters and are domestic staff and for worship of shrines are not tenable.

    “I hold that I cannot find justification to uphold the claimants’ suggestion that all and every person connected to Abatan Compound inclusive those connected with the area involved in roasting oysters and the area for the worship of shrines were all domestics or Arotas.

    “It would be wild and indefensible for a court without any other corroborative or definitive nexus to say regarding a land where in different sections, different activities were ongoing, that Oluwa Chieftaincy Family members would not be also present there, even in a supervisory capacity,” the judge held.

    “On the whole, I am satisfied that on the competing evidence, there is no merit to the legal strategy of the claimants to disinherit the first defendant, Chief Mukaila Kolawole Oluwa, as a legitimate member of Oluwa Chieftaincy Family from the Odofin branch of the Family”, the judge said.

    “This suit is an abuse of court process that calls for its dismissal, … the claimants case therefore, fails and the suit is dismissed forthwith”, Justice Candide-Johnson held.

  • Congress: INEC, APC urge court to reject motion to stop Lagos delegates

    •Court fixes June 19 for ruling

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the All Progressives Congress (APC) have urged a Federal High Court in Abuja to refuse a motion seeking to restrain them from recognising Lagos State’s delegates for the June 23 national convention of the party.

    INEC and APC made the request in their separate counter-arguments to the motion for interlocutory injunctions filed by an aggrieved member of the APC in Lagos State, Bunmi Tayo Church.

    Church, whose substantive suit is challenging the outcome of the last ward, local government and state congresses of the APC in Lagos State, is seeking the interlocutory injunction pending the determination of the main suit.

    He urged the court to restrain APC and INEC “from according recognition or giving effect to the results of the first defendant’s (APC) Lagos chapter’s purported ward congress, local government congress and state congresses, pending the determination of the substantive suit”.

    Church also prayed the court for an interlocutory injunction restraining the APC from parading any person(s) or permitting any person(s) to parade themselves as being the persons elected by virtue of the first defendant’s Lagos chapter’s purported ward, local government and state congresses, pending the determination of the substantive suit.

    Akin Olujinmi (SAN), who represented Church, argued the motion and urged the court to grant his client’s reliefs to preserve the res (subject) of the case.

    Olujinmi averred that since the APC’s national congress was scheduled for June 23, there was need to preserve the subject of the substantive suit.

    He said there were special issues to be tried in the main suit, which seeks, among others, the determination of whether or not the congresses conducted in Lagos State should not be set aside since the party had allegedly flouted the nation’s constitution, its own constitution and guidelines for the conduct of ward, local government and state congresses.

    In its counter-argument, APC faulted the competence of the motion for interlocutory injunctions and urged the court to refuse it.

    INEC’s lawyer, Alhassan Umar, also urged the court to refuse the motion on the grounds that it contains similar prayers as those contained in the substantive suit.

    The lawyer argued that the plaintiff failed, in his argument, to disclose any legal right he seeks to protect or show any serious issues to be tried in the main case.

    He added: “Where the facts in support of the interlocutory application are similar to those in support of the main claim or are entirely interwoven with the facts required to determine the case on the merit, a court of equity is enjoined to decline granting the interlocutory application.

    “Instead, the court is enjoined to order accelerated hearing of the substantive matter. This is so because the court, in doing otherwise, may fall into the unhealthy situation of deciding the same issue twice.

    “First, at the interlocutory stage, and then, the ultimate decision at the end of the trial. Such a procedure will be prejudicial to a fair trial of the substantive case.

    “The law is that the court should avoid the resolution of complex and intricate issues at the interlocutory stage.

    “It is submitted that the plaintiff/applicant has not satisfied the requirements to enable the court exercise its discretion in favour of granting the reliefs sought on the face of the motion for interlocutory injunctions.”

    After listening to arguments by lawyers representing the parties, Justice Binta Nyako adjourned till June 19 for ruling.

    In his affidavit supporting the main suit, Church, who claimed to be interested in contesting for the party’s chairmanship in Mushin Local Government Area, said he would have realised his ambition and become a delegate but for the unlawful way the congresses were conducted.

    He contended that the congresses conducted in Lagos were in violation of the party’s constitution, its guidelines for the conduct of ward, local government and state congresses and the Constitution of Nigeria (as amended).

  • N1.162b fraud: Court jails former Governor Dariye 16yrs

    •Ex-governor gave N100m each to SouthWest, North Central PDP

    A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Gudu, Abuja yesterday sentenced former Plateau State Governor Joshua Chibi Dariye to a 16 years in prison.

    Dariye’s sentence followed his conviction on 15 counts on the offences of criminal breach of trust and criminal misappropriation. The court freed him on eight out of the 23 counts for which he was tried.

    Justice Adebukola Banjoko sentenced Senator Dariye APC (Plateau Central),   to two years for misappropriation and 14 years for criminal breach of trust.

    The sentences are to run concurrently, implying that Dariye will spend 14 years in custody.

    Dariye was arraigned by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on July 13, 2007 on a 23-count charge in which he was accused of diverting Plateau State’s funds estimated at over N2billion, using his private company Ebenezer Retnan Ventures.

    Part of the state’s funds diverted by the defendant was the N1.162 billion he received from the Ecological Funds, using the name of Plateau state.

    Dariye pleaded not guilty to the charge, but before trial could commence, Dariye filed an application challenging the competence of the charges and the jurisdiction of the court. He argued that he ought to be tried before a Plateau State High Court and not the FCT High Court.

    On December 13, 2007, the trial judge heard and dismissed Dariye’s application for lacking in merit. Dariye appealed against the ruling of the court. But the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal affirmed the decision of Justice Banjoko. Dariye subsequently took the matter to the Supreme Court.

    On February 27, 2015, the Supreme Court dismissed Dariye’s appeal and ordered him to submit himself for trial.

    In the course of trial before the High Court of the FCT, the prosecution called 10 witnesses, while the defence called 16.

    One of the prosecution’s witnesses was a retired Metropolitan Police officer, Peter Clark.

    Clark had, while in office, investigated Dariye when he was arrested in the United Kingdom on money laundering charges while serving as a governor.

    While testifying, Clark said Dariye was still wanted in the UK for money laundering charges because he allegedly jumped bail.

    He gave details of Dariye’s alleged extravagant spending, including the purchase of a pen for £7,000 (N3.4m) in London, before the former governor was arrested.

    Delivering judgment yesterday, Justice Banjoko, found among others, that Dariye diverted and misappropriation Plateau State’s funds using his company Ebenezer Retnan.

    She said while evidence revealed that the company was not registered and had no record of any contract with the Plateau State Government, funds flowed from the state’s agencies into the company”s account which Dariye opened and ran stealthily.

    The judge noted that the account opened in the company’s name in the then All States Trust Bank, Abuja had no picture of the owner, no traceable address, but had Dariye and one Haruna Daniel as signatories.

    The judge wondered why Dariye operated an account without allowing the normal documentation that revealed his identity if his intention was not to use the account for illegal purposes.

    Justice Banjoko also found that Dariye, after collecting the N1.162 billion Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) cheque from the Ecological funds office of the Federal Government in Abuja, rather than deploy it for the purpose for which it was meant, decided to divert it.

    She noted that, in the course of diverting the money, Dariye gave N100m each to the PDP in South West and North Central.

    The judge said evidence revealed that the money paid to South West PDP, which was paid through then Minster of Special Duties Yomi Edu, was later returned by then President Olusegun Obasanjo, but that there was no evidence regarding whether or not the money got paid into Plateau State account.

    She said the cash paid to the North Central PDP through a company – Marine Float Limited – said to be owned by former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar was yet to be recovered.

    The judge found that Dariye also gave the then Permanent Secretary of the Ecological Fund Office, Dr. Kingsley Ikumah, N80million,which he said was gratification for facilitating the prompt release of the funds.

    Justice Banjoko wondered why Dariye chose to share funds specifically meant to address the ecological challenges in some communities in his state to people and agencies without any relationship with Plateau State.

    She also found that, of the N1.162billion released for the state, Dariye only released N550 million to the state, thereby changing the character of the money and concealing its source.

    The judge equally found that Dariye paid millions of Plateau State’s money to a company, Pinnacle Communications, without evidence that the company executed valid contracts for the state.

    She said in all, Dariye betrayed the trust reposed in him as a public officer with dominion over properties belonging to Plateau State.

    At the judge’s pronouncement that Dariye was guilty, the senator, who had sat calmly in the dock, sought the court’s permission to be allowed to visit the convenience.

    The judge obliged him, and when proceedings resumed, his lawyer, Mr. Paul Erokoro (SAN), tried to downplay the offences which he described as “some mistakes”.

    Erokoro was part of the legal team led by a former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Kanu Agabi (SAN) that took over the defence after Dariye had called all his 10 witnesses.

    Erokoro blamed the lawyers that handled the defence before they came in. He said Dariye was “a victim” of some situations including poor defence and the culture of corruption that pervaded the Nigerian society.

    In urging the judge to impose a lighter sentence on his client, Erokoro said the case against Nyame who was jailed by the judge barely two weeks ago, was different from Dariye’s.

    He also noted that his client, like many other “pioneer governors” who were elected on the return of democratic rule in 1999, was ignorant of some financial procedures.

    The lawyer, who noted that the judge’s decisions were almost never upturned by the Court of Appeal, said “we are forced to fall on your mercy”.

    “I have appealed against two of your judgments and I did not win. They said you were right,” he said.

    Responding, Jacobs urged the court to impose the maximum sentence to serve as deterence to others.

    He said, “The era of go and sin no more can no longer be done in the new era of the Administration of Criminal justice Act. A lesson must be told.

    “He is not my enemy, but people should bear the consequences of their acts. If you can’t bear it, then don’t do it.”

    At a point, Dariye asked to be allowed to speak. The judge allowed him. He told Jacobs to be fair to him and not to further foul the judge’s mind against him.

    After listening to the allocutus (plea for mercy) from the defence and the prosecution’s response, Justice Banjoko rose for about 30 unites.

    On her return, before pronouncing her sentence, Justice Banjoko made an observation. She noted that from the bank statements tendered in court, Dariye appeared richer than the his state and could have aided the state rather than diverting its resources.

    She also observed that 20 members of the Plateau State House of Assembly, visited the UK during the defendant’s impeachment, to submit a letter of protest to Tony Blair about the state of emergency imposed on the state.

    She said members of the delegation, which included then Commissioner for Information, Patrick Dapong, by embarking on the journey in July 2004 forgot that Nigeria is a sovereign state and was not under any form of colonial rule.

    The judge said they displayed their ignorance of international laws and norms. She noted that the trip was absolutely a purposeless visit and a reckless squandering of public funds and exhibiting ignorance of

    In reference to Erokoro’s plea for leniency, the judge noted that the defendant and others, who aided him in committing the offences, were “adults capable of making their own rational choices.

    “We cannot begin to count the physical moral and sociological costs involved in this whole tragedy of corruption that we call normal.”

    On Erokoro’s statement that corruption was pervasive in the country, Justice Banjoko said “whether corruption is endemic or not, there should be no compromise irrespective of your tribe, your religion or your socio-economic status. An act of corruption will always be act of corruption.”

    When about to pronounce the sentence, she directed Dariye, who had all the while seated in the dock, to stand up, which he did.

    Justice Banjoko, who commended the prosecution for a job well done, said the prevalence of corruption and criminality in the nation’s public space required drastic measures.

    The judge noted that the defence was shabby in the conduct of its case. She said it committed avoidable errors and called witnesses that eventually added nails to its coffin.

    Justice Banjoko noted that one of the defence witnesses, who was deputy chairman of PDP in Plateau State, confirmed receiving N66milllion diverted by the defendant from the Ecological Funds, on behalf of 274 wards in the state.

    The judge noted that from his conduct and the way he spoke, the PDP chieftain did not see anything wrong in the defendant treating state’s funds as what could be used to fund his party.

    She directed that all funds so far recovered should be paid to Plateau State. She also asked the EFCC to make efforts to recover more of the looted funds.

    Dressed in a flowing black stripped, sky-blue agbada, with a cap to match, Dariye arrived at the courtroom around 9.8am. He went into the dock when the case was called about five minutes later.

    After the judge announced the sentence and rose around 5 pm, armed securitymen , who flooded the courtroom took charge.

    They led Dariye, who came to court in his official car as a Senator, into a waiting pick-up van marked: HH43ABC.

    He was driven out of the court premises around 5. 25pm, with his official car was driven behind by his driver, with some family members inside.

     

     

     

     

  • Court sets December 17 for suit to wind up BBNaija sponsor Payporte

    A Federal High Court in Lagos yesterday fixed December 17 for hearing a winding-up petition filed by Vacant Board Limited against sponsors of this year’s Big Brother Naija (BBN) show, Payporte Global System Limited.

    Justice Ayokunle Faji fixed the date for hearing after granting a motion by the respondent seeking to regularise its processes.

    At the hearing, Mr Yemi Fajuyitan appeared for the petitioner, while Mr Ovoke Borlokor appeared for the respondent.

    Borlokor informed the court of his motion seeking an extension of time to file his reply to the petition.

    This application for regularisation was not opposed by counsel to the petitioner, who also informed the court that he had filed his written replies as well as counter affidavits.

    Justice Faji granted the application for the regularisation and fixed December 17 for hearing of the suit.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the petitioner had filed a debt recovery suit against Payporte before a Lagos High Court in 2015.

    The court, in its judgment delivered on May 27, 2016, awarded N23.1 million against Payporte, in favour of the petitioner.

    The petitioner recalled that on February 27, last year, the respondent made a part-payment of N5 million, leaving a balance of N17.1 million, which it failed to liquidate till date, despite several demand letters.

    It filed a winding-up petition before the Federal High Court on December 29, last year, asking it to wind up the company.

    Also, in its notice of preliminary objection on April 25, the respondent challenged the jurisdiction of the court to entertain or even hear the petition.

    The counsel to the respondent, Mr Ogedi Ogu, averred that the petition for winding-up failed to comply with the provisions of sections 5 and 6 of the Companies Winding-Up Rules, 2001.

    The lawyer argued that no summons was filed by the petitioner, issued or sealed in respect of the said petition, adding that the failure rendered the petition null and void.

    He said the failure of the petitioner to file and serve the summons before the commencement of the winding-up suit robbed the court of the jurisdiction to hear the suit, as same cannot be competently activated in the petition as presently constituted.

    Payporte contends that the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the petitioner’s suit.

    The company said it is defective, bad in law, null and void and constituted an abuse of court process.

    It averred that the winding-up suit be dismissed with substantial costs awarded against the petitioner.

  • Court to hear family’s suit against uncle June 26

    The Federal High Court in Lagos has fixed June 26, to hear a suit filed by the wife and children of the late Captain Romeo Itima, against his elder brother, Captain Winfred Itima.

    Justice Babs Kuewumi, on May 16, adjourned the suit for hearing of preliminary applications.

    The late Romeo is the founder and pioneer Managing Director (MD) of Global West Vessel Specialist Limited (GWVSL), while his brother is the current MD of the firm.

    The plaintiffs – Mrs Helen Itima, her sons, Zion Itima and Kevin Itima – in a suit marked FHC/CS/1123/2017, accused Winfred of financial mismanagement and unprofessional conducts.

    The first to fourth defendants are GWVSL, Winfred Itima, Olugbenga Leke Oyewole and Olabisi Afolabi.

    Through their counsel, Affinih Peter Egbegi, the plaintiffs alleged that Winfred took control of Romeo’s companies shortly after his death, to the exclusion of the deceased’s immediate family.

    In their statement of claim, they averred that the late Romeo, a master mariner, established the company in Nigeria in 2009 to combat piracy and associated crimes plaguing Nigeria’s territorial waters as a master mariner.

    On August 7, 2012, in Escravos, Delta State, he reportedly fell off a boat and drowned.

    They claimed that the second defendant took over Romeo’s companies, GWVSL and Molecular Power Systems Limited, shortly afterwards and has refused to give account of the finances of the firms.

    The family alleged that Winfred unlawfully allotted to himself 6,000,000 ordinary shares of Molecular Power Systems Limited without recourse to the pioneer shareholders including Mrs. Helen Itima who is an administrator of the deceased’s estate.

    They further averred that he allegedly reduced Romeo’s shares of 2,000,000 to 300,000, as part of a “deliberate attempt” to deprive them of their rights, interests, and entitlements, among others.

    According to them, his actions were “a clear breach of filial affection, trust, care and confidence” the deceased reposed in him.

    They prayed the court to order the defendants to give detailed account of all the assets, including vessels purchased under the Private Public Partnership Agreement between the first defendant and Nigeria Maritime Safety and Administration Agency (NIMASA), among other reliefs.

    But the defendants, in a September 19, 2017 Motion on Notice filed through their counsel Francess Ogie and Favour Osa-Oni, prayed the court to strike out the service of the originating processes on them for being defective and incompetent.

    They averred that the copy of the originating processes did not contain copies of the documents the plaintiffs sought to rely on as provided in Order 3 rule 1(b) of the rules of the court.

  • Court grants bail to seven Jewish worshippers in Abia

    High Court sitting in Umuahia, the Abia State capital yesterday granted bail to Seven out of nine Jewish worshippers arrested at the Afara Ukwu country home of the leader of the Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.

    The worshipers were denied bail and remanded at the Afara Ukwu Prison facility by Chief Magistrate O.U. Ugwu of Umuahia for lack of jurisdiction to try the matter on May 14 after they were brought before the court.

    Six of the accused were arraigned at the High Court 1 presided over by the Acting Chief Judge of the state, Justice Onuoha Ogwe while three others were arraigned before Justice O.A. Chijioke of High Court 3.

    While Justice Ogwe granted the six accused bail in the sum of N1 million, Justice Chijioke granted one bail in the sum of N200, 000 each, adding that the surety must have verifiable residence and to deposit two copies of recent passports.

    Some of the people granted bail was Elder Ifeanyi Nwafor, Nkama Agha, Ifeanyichukwu Anukwua, Mazi Donatus Nwadike, Akelibo Okurishi, Chukwuemeka Adaenyi and Nwaeke Nehemiah. But Uche Ikechukwu and Linus Njoku Ede were not granted bail.

    Aloy Ejimakor, counsel to the Jewish nine, said: “What happened in the court was something that I am satisfied about.

    ”It is instructive to note that all of them were charged together in the same charge sheet. So, I expected that all the nine cases should have been listed before the same court, but unfortunately, they were not, so. I tried all I could to accomplish the task of listing all the nine before the same court, but it didn’t happen. What happened today in court should be sufficient pointer to what will happen on the 19th because I expect to prevail. It is a bail able offence. They weren’t arrested with any weapon and there is no evidence indicating that violence was at foot. They don’t have any criminal records. They only came to pray and perform some sort of pilgrimage at the home of one of their members; Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, I don’t believe there is enough evidence to keep them in detention for this long. On 19th June, my argument would be that their way to freedom is long overdue and I will cite what happened in court today for that very court to be aware that bail was granted to co-defendants in the same matter.”

  • Student in court over theft of phone, laptop

    A 20-year-old student, Bawa Jeremiah was on Monday arraigned in a Daura Road Chief Magistrates’ Court in Kaduna for alleged theft of phone and laptop.

    Jeremiah, a resident of Gbangyi village in Kaduna is being tried for conspiracy and stealing.

    The Prosecutor, Sgt. Luka Yilgi told the court that Joseph Ikechukwu of Ahmadu Bello Way, Kaduna reported the matter at Sabon Gari Police Station on May 30.

    Yilgi said that the defendant conspired with one Umar Mohammed now at large and broke into the apartment of the complainant, to steal a laptop and phone all valued at N200, 000.

    He said that the defendant was caught by the complainant’s neighbour who saw him and his accomplice acting in a dubious manner.

    The prosecutor said that the defendant’s accomplice escaped with the phone and laptop while he was apprehended and taken to police station for further questioning.

    Read Also: Court remands man in court for enticing a married woman

    He said the offence contravened Sections 271 and 302 of the Penal Code Laws of Kaduna State.

    The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    The Magistrate, Mr Ibrahim Sidi, granted bail to the accused in the sum of N50,000 with two sureties in like sum.

    He said the surety must reside within the jurisdiction of the court and must submit two recent passport photographs.

    Sidi adjourned the case until June 18, for hearing.

  • Man, 27, in court over attempt to rape 60-year-old

    A 27-year-old man, Adeoye Olatomide, was on Friday docked in an Okitipupa Magistrates’ Court in Ondo State for alleged attempt to rape a 60-year-old woman.

    Olatomide is facing three-count charge of conspiracy, assault and attempted rape.

    The Prosecutor, Insp. Zedekiah Orogbemi, told the court that the defendant committed the offences with one other person currently at large on April 12 at 6.30 p.m along Okitipupa-Irele Junction.

    Orogbemi said Olatomide dragged the woman to a nearby bush and forcefully had canal knowledge of her.

    Read Also: ‘Killer’-wife arraigned for hubby’s death

    The prosecutor added that “Olatomide was apprehended by a passerby, while his accomplice escaped.”

    He said the offences contravened sections 356, 357 and 358, Criminal Law of Ondo State, 2006.

    However, the defendant pleaded not guilty to charges against him and the Magistrate, Mr Banji Ayeomoni, ordered that he be remanded in prison and adjourned the case until June 22.

  • Court jails human trafficker in Edo

    An Edo State High Court has sentenced Ehigie Richard to seven years imprisonment for trafficking fellow Nigerians to Russia.

    Richard was arraigned for recruitment of a person by means of abuse, position of vulnerability and facilitation and exportation of persons for prostitution, contrary to various provisions of the Trafficking in Persons (Prohibition) Enforcement and Administration Act, 2015.

    He was said to have recruited one woman, identified simply as Miss X, and trafficked her to Russia, where she was exploited.

    A statement by the Zonal Commander of National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP), Nduka Nwanwenne, said the victim was taken to a shrine, where an oath of secrecy was administered on her and was asked to pay back $55,000 for between six months and one year.

    Nwanwenne said the victim was warned not to run away or report her madam in Russia to the police of the failure to pay the money or the oath would make her go mad.

    He said the case against the accused was investigated in collaboration with the Joint Border Task Force (JBTF), a multi-disciplinary crime fighting task force.

    The statement said: “On arrival in Russia, her phone and international passport were seized by her madam, Bridget, and her boyfriend, Kingsley. The madam allegedly opened a website for prostitutes for the victim, where her information and pictures were downloaded.

    “Customers usually check and call for appointments. A notebook was procured for the recording of all earnings. Similarly, the victim was made to pay 10,000 Rubble for rent and 50,000 Rubble to service the website.

    “Before the victim threw in the towel, she had paid $40,000 to her madam. On the day the victim escaped, her madam went out to shop. She used the opportunity to run to one of her Russian friends who took her to the Nigeria Embassy in Moscow before she returned to Nigeria.”

    Delivering judgment on the matter, Justice Alero Edodo-Erauga said the law must have its way, despite the fact that the accused pleaded for leniency and did not waste the time of the court.

    The judge sentenced the accused to one year imprisonment on count one or a fine of N250,000 and to two years imprisonment each for other counts or a fine of N1 million on each count.

    The jail terms are to run concurrently.

    NAPTIP’s Director-General Dame Julie Okha–Donli said suspected traffickers must face justice for their crimes.

    She urged human traffickers to desist from their nefarious acts and redirect their energy to positive ventures.