Tag: Court

  • Olanusi: Court adjourns till Jan 20

    Olanusi: Court adjourns till Jan 20

    An Akure High Court in Ondo State has adjourned hearing till January 20 in the case by former Deputy Governor Ali Olanusi, challenging his impeachment.

    Justice Rotimi Olamide adjourned after Olanusi’s counsel Olusola Oke moved an application asking for the court’s leave to enable him file an amended originating summon to replace the one filed by Olanusi’s former counsel.

    The Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Eyitayo Jegede (SAN), who appeared for the respondents with the Director of Civil Litigation, A. Akinrinsola and the Deputy Director Civil Litigation, Taiwo Olubodun, did not oppose the application.

    Granting the application, Justice Olamide gave the claimant three days to file a fresh application and approved 14 days for the defendants to file consequential response to the originating summons.

    Oke said: “When I was given the brief, I saw two reliefs which will compel us to take some steps in terms of joining some individuals, who are not part of the case.

    “After consulting with the lead counsel, Niyi Akintola, we concluded that instead of bringing in more people, waste time and bring undue complication; we should delete the two reliefs. Deleting the two reliefs will not affect the substance of our case, which is about the impeachment of the claimant.”

  • Court adjourns deposed Deji’s case till Dec. 17

    Court adjourns deposed Deji’s case till Dec. 17

    Ondo State Chief Judge Justice Olaseinde Kumuyi yesterday adjourned hearing till December 17 in the application filed by the government seeking the dismissal of a case by the deposed Deji of Akure, Adepoju Adesina.

    Adesina is challenging his deposition by the Ondo State government before a State High Court in Akure, the state capital.

    He was, however, absent in court during the resumed hearing of his case against the government.

    Adesina, represented by his counsel, Jones Osimerha, informed the court of his inability to appear.

    The government represented by the Deputy Director of Public Prosecution (DDPP),Kayode Salami, urged the court to dismiss the case on the grounds that the defendants were not properly served with the notice of summons.

    The DPP told the court that such case should not be entertained by it as an appellate court was handling it.

    He, therefore, advised the court to discountenance it, saying further hearing on the matter was unnecessary.

    But, Osimerha argued that the government was only looking for technical grounds to allow the case to be dismissed by the court.

    He said all interested parties in the case were duly served with the court summons.

    The Chief Judge, Justice Olaseinde Kumuyi, adjourned hearing on the application for the dismissal of the case filed by the government till December 17.

  • Court upholds Umeh’s, Uba’s elections

    Court upholds Umeh’s, Uba’s elections

    •Ekwunife faults judgment

    The Court of Appeal sitting in Enugu State has upheld the elections of Senator Andy Uba and former National Chairman of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) Chief Victor Umeh.

    Former Enugu State Governor Chimaroke Nnamani lost his appeal challenging Senator Gilbert Nnaji, who defeated him in the Enugu East Senatorial election.

    The court set aside the judgment of the lower tribunal, which last month ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct a fresh election within 90 days. Nnamani challenged the declaration of Nnaji as the winner of the March 28 election, alleging irregularities.

    The court also struck out the result of the forensic exercise, which the lower tribunal relied on in nullifying Nnaji’s election because, according to it, the forensic expert restricted himself to three councils instead of six.

    The court also considered Dr. Ernest Ndukwe’s appeal and Uba’s cross appeal and concluded that Ndukwe failed to comply with Paragraph 4(1) (1) of the Electoral Act, 2010.

    Uba’s non-qualification, as pleaded by Ndukwe, was thrown out on the grounds that Ndukwe raised the point without proof and that Uba had the right to deny without proof.

    Nullifying Senator Uche Ekwunife’s election, the appellate court ordered INEC to conduct a fresh election in Anambra Central within 90 days.

    The three-man panel, led by Justice A.H. Yahya, upheld Umeh’s appeal challenging Ekwunife’s election, saying: “The perverse decision of the lower tribunal cannot stand. This appeal stands and INEC is ordered to conduct a fresh election in Anambra Central within 90 days.”

    Reacting to the judgment, Umeh thanked the court for dispensing justice without fear or favour.

    He described the judgment as a victory for democracy and rule of law.

    “We will go into the election prepared unlike in the past when our opponents had the police, Army, INEC and everybody. This time, we will subject ourselves to the will of the people. The era of impunity is gone. We now have a government of change and we will ensure that only people with integrity will conduct the election,” he said.

    There was a victory dance by some members of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) as the news filtered in.

    But Ekwunife described the judgment as a fatal principle of democracy.

    The judgment has thrown Anambra Central into confusion.

    However, Ekwunife is optimistic she would win the rerun. She described the judgment as that of man and not God, urging her supporters to remain calm.

    She said: “The judgment is that of man. The court acted as a Father Christmas by awarding to Chief Victor Umeh, what he did not ask for.

    “But I take the judgment in good faith, believing that my victory at the poll was an act of God. I assure my supporters that we will emerge victorious even as I thank Ndi Anambra Central for their support so far.”

    The court also upheld the elections of Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu and Senator Obinna Ogba (Ebonyi Central).

  • Court grants firm access to funds

    Justice Mohammed Yunusa of the Federal High Court in Lagos has granted Honeywell Flour Mills Plc  access to its funds in all banks in Nigeria.

    The judge said it would be unfair to deny it access to funds since the case is yet to be determined.

    The court had, following an ex-parte application by Ecobank Nigeria Limited, through its lawyer Mr Kunle Ogunba (SAN), restrained chairman of Honeywell Group, Dr Oba Otukedo, the company’s directors and others from withdrawing from any bank or financial institution.

    It is over a debt allegedly owed the bank by Honeywell.

    But Honeywell, through its counsel Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) sought to discharge the order, contending that it was an abuse of court process.

    In its counter-affidavit, the company said: “Sometime in 2013, the applicant along with its sister companies, Anchorage Leisures Ltd and Siloam Global Ltd under the auspices of their parent company, Honeywell Group Ltd, commenced discussions with the respondent with a view to a global and complete settlement of their outstanding liabilities towards which parties agreed for a total full and final payment…”

    Ruling, Justice Yunusa said he was inclined to vary the orders to enable Honeywell Group meet its financial obligations.

    He held that the company could withdraw up to N60million in a month from its accounts pending when the suit is heard and determined.

    Justice Yunusa adjourned till January 13 for hearing.

  • Battle shifts to court as Bello is declared governor-elect

    Battle shifts to court as Bello is declared governor-elect

    CONTROVERSY yesterday trailed the declaration of All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate Alhaji Yahaya Bello as winner of Saturday’s governorship election in Kogi State by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    With the declaration, all is now set for the continuation of a legal tussle to determine the state’s next governor.

    The Audu/Faleke Campaign Organisation, in a statement yesterday by its Director of Media, Duro Meseko in Lokoja, said the final results as declared by INEC vindicated its claims that the November 21 had already been won and should have been declared as such.

    INEC declared the election inconclusive on November 22 to pave the way for a supplementary poll which held in 91 voting centres across 18 council areas on Saturday.

    The  Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) rejected the result and declared its candidate, Governor Idris Wada, the winner.

    It described the supplementary election as a “complete waste of tax payers’ money”.

    According to the Faleke/ Audu campaign statement, in the supplementary election’s final results declared by INEC, the APC polled 6,885 votes while the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) scored 5,363, making a total of 12, 248 votes, a far-cry from the 49,353 registered voters which the INEC inform the declaration of the initial poll inconclusive.

    It reads: “It is now crystal clear to everybody that the Kogi governorship election of November 21 was already won and lost before the strange supplementary election was introduced. We therefore urge our supporters to remain calm and steadfast while the law takes its rightful course.”

    On its part, the PDP rejected the supplementary election and its results, vowing to challenge the outcome at the governorship election petition tribunal.

    The party’s local Publicity Secretary, Mr. Yomi Ogunmola, said the APC candidate was declared winner of the election by the Returning Officer despite not scoring the highest number of votes.

    His words: “The position of the party is that the election result is not acceptable and we will be approaching the tribunal for justice.”

    According to Ogunmola, the PDP has a lot of grounds to challenge the outcome of the entire result.

    He said: “There are lots of grounds but I can only tell you one. You heard when the returning officer said Yahaya Bello is the candidate with the majority of votes cast, but he is not. The majority of the votes cast belong to someone else.”

    Asked who the person is, Ogunmola said: “Why not wait till we get to the bridge before crossing it.”

    The governor-elect(Bello) called for calm, describing the APC as one big family and that there was bound to be misunderstanding among members of a family.

    He promised to bring all those that are aggrieved together on assumption of office.

    His words: “In a family, there is bound to one misunderstanding or the other but if I assume the responsibility as governor of the state, I will ensure that all the aggrieved parties are brought together.

    “Everybody would air their own grievances but we will make sure that everybody is carried along. To my brothers in other political parties, after politics, we have to settle for the business of governance because in our state, so much needed to be done. We would all sit at a roundtable and do the needful.”

  • Kogi supplementary election: Court refuses to stop INEC

    Kogi supplementary election: Court refuses to stop INEC

    •Dismisses Wada’s, Faleke’s, others’ suits    •Supporters return home dejected

    Justice Gabriel Kolawole of the Federal High Court, Abuja yesterday declined jurisdiction over the five suits filed in relation to the dispute arising from the inconclusive governorship election in Kogi State.

    The judge, in two judgments he delivered, dismissed the suits by the state governor, Idris Wada and his party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the running mate to Abubakar Audu,  the deceased governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), James Faleke, and three others, on the ground that his court lacked the jurisdiction to determine the issues raised.

    Justice Kolawole said the issues raised were election related and had crossed the “threshold” of matters on which the court could exercise jurisdiction because the election results in most of the polling units had been declared.

    He added that the suits qualified as a post-election dispute that could only be entertained by the election petition tribunal which would be set up by the President of the Court of Appeal in line with section285(2) of the Constitution.

    The judge said he refrained from looking at the merit of the cases to enable parties re-argued the issues involved at the election petition tribunal.

    By implication, the supplementary election scheduled for the state tomorrow, by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), is unhindered, because the suits had, among others, sought to restrain INEC from proceeding with the supplementary election.

    The first was on four consolidated suits filed by Wada, Emanuel Daiko, who claimed to have contested the election as a candidate of the People for Democratic Change (PDC); Raphael Igbokwe (a PDP member of the House of Representatives from Imo State) and Stephen Wada Omaye and a Johnson Jacob Usman (who claimed to be an indigene of the state, a registered voter and a lawyer.

    The second judgment was on the suit by Faleke. Wada had, in the main, urged the court to compel INEC to declare him winner of the election, on the ground that he is the only surviving candidate in the election who scored the second highest votes after the deceased candidate of the APC.

    Faleke, on his part, faulted the decision by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to declare the election inconclusive; asked the court to among others compel INEC to declare his joint ticket with the late Abubakar Audu winner of the election and to restrain it (INEC) from proceeding with its planned supplementary election.

    In dismissing the suits, the judge upheld arguments by lawyers to INEC (first defendant) and the Attorney-General of the Federation (second defendant), Adegboyega Awomolo  (SAN) and T. A Gazali, to the effect that the court was without the requisite jurisdiction to determine the cases, which border on the outcome of an election already held.

    It was also their argument that it was within the INEC’s powers to conduct the supplementary election.

    The judge held that all the suits, being similar except in their “styles of presentation”, were rooted in events which had crossed “the threshold mark” of cases which the Federal High Court could accommodate under its jurisdiction specified under section 87(10) of the Electoral Act.

    “By this, the event of the election held on November 21, 2015 was not within the contemplation of the said provision and because substantial results were already released and announced, the electoral process, in my view, has crossed the threshold mark of an event in which only the governorship election tribunal as will be constituted by the President of the Court of Appeal pursuant to section 285(2) of the Constitution can entertain,” Justice Kolawole said.

    He added that since his court lacked the power to grant the prayers sought by the plaintiffs, it would amount to “idle judicial indulgence” for it to go ahead to evoke its interpretative jurisdiction of the law under section 251 (1)(ii) of the Constitution.

    The judge further held that his judgment did not affirm the validity or correctness of INEC’s decision to declare the November 21 election inconclusive and to hold a supplementary election.

    He said issues raised in the suits, having not been decided on its merit, could be re-argued at the election petition tribunal after the conclusion of the election and the winner declared by INEC.

    “The interpretation of the provision of the Constitution cannot be an exercise the court will entertain in vacuum but must relate to a controversy which the provision of the Constitution are to be interpreted are meant to resolve and or determine

    “When I pondered over and over each of the reliefs being sought, even in the broad sense into which they have been compartmentalised, the conclusion which I have reached is not that I have, by any stretch of the construction of any of the provisions of the laws cited by counsel, affirmed the correctness of the decision of the first defendant (INEC) to declare the election held on November 21, 2015 as inconclusive and or to affirm the validity of the supplementary election that is scheduled for December 5, 2015.

    “These are legitimate issues which this court would be entitled to resolve were it that I have jurisdiction to grant the reliefs, perhaps the principal reliefs being sought in all of the four suits which were tagged as consolidated suits on December 3, 2015.

    “To proceed to affirm or otherwise the first defendant’s decision by which the election was declared inconclusive and to hold the supplementary election will be nothing short of exercising jurisdiction which I don’t seem to have. The jurisdiction which this court has exercises is as provided for in section 87 (10) of the Electoral Act supra,” Justice Kolawole said.

    While the court proceedings lasted, supporters of both Wada and Faleke, who bore placards and banners with various messages of support for their preferred candidate, danced and sang right in front of the court’s entrance.

    Some sat close to the entrance, smoking cigarette and drinking alcohol. Men of the Nigeria Police Force, kept watch all through.

    On learning about the court’s pronouncement, the dejected supporters stopped their activities and departed quietly.

  • Court orders EFCC to produce Dokpesi

    Court orders EFCC to produce Dokpesi

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to produce High Chief Raymond Dokpesi before it.

    The order made ex-parte yesterday by Justice Gabriel Kolawole followed an ex-parte application by Dokpesi who claimed to have been unlawfully detained beyond 48 hours by the EFCC.

    The judge, who heard the applicant’s lawyer, Mike Ozekhome (SAN) in chambers, ordered the EFCC to produce Dokpesi before his court on the next hearing date of December 14.

    Ozekhome, who told journalists what happened in the judge’s chambers, said the judge also ordered the EFCC to show cause why he should not grant Dokpesi’s prayer for unconditional or conditional bail.

    Dokpesi had, in the application, prayed for an order compelling the respondent to produce the applicant who is currently in its custody or any other place of detention before this court on the date this application comes up for hearing.

    He also sought an order admitting the applicant to bail on self-recognisance or on such favourable and liberal terms as this court may deem fit to make in the circumstances of this case, pending the formal arraignment of the applicant before a court of law.

    He hinged his prayers on the ground that no formal charge has been brought against him, over 48 hours after his detention.

    The applicant said he went to honour a verbal invitation from officials of the EFCC on December 1 and had been detained since then after subjecting him to hours of “unprepared interrogation.”

    He argued that the offences alleged against him “are ordinarily bailable.” He promised not to jump bail, not to interfere with witnesses or the course of justice, if any formal charge was filed against him.

    Dokpesi said, with his social status, the court could grant him bail on liberal terms, or on self- recognisance as he has no criminal antecedents or record. He promised to attend court, if eventually he is formally arraigned.

    In a supporting affidavit, the applicant said he was arrested over his inability to honour an invitation by the office of the National Security Adviser (NSA), inviting Daar Investment and Holding Limited (an arm of Daar Communications Ltd) “for discussion on the supply and services rendered to the Office of the NSA.”

    He stated that while he was yet to perfect the bail granted him by the EFCC “on the most onerous,” it went before a Magistrate’s Court to procure an order to legitimise and further detain him.

  • Fed Govt urges court to stop Dasuki from travelling abroad

    Fed Govt urges court to stop Dasuki from travelling abroad

    THE Federal Government has urged the Federal High Court, Abuja to stay execution of its earlier order granted to former National Security Adviser Sambo Dasuki to travel abroad for medical treatment.

    Counsel to the government Mr. Oladipo Okpeseyi (SAN) made the oral application yesterday at the resume of hearing of the case before Justice Adeniyi Ademola.

    Okpeseyi told the court that the government had filed a notice of appeal at the Court of Appeal, Abuja against the court ruling.

    He said the prosecution filed the motion pursuant to Section 169 of the Administration of Criminal Justice (ACJ) Act 2015.

    The lawyer also disclosed that the prosecution had filed another motion before the court seeking to revoke the bail earlier granted to Dasuki.

    The former NSA, who is facing charges of money laundering and illegal possession of firearms, had been granted bail on self- recognition.

    Akposeyi said they were seeking the revocation of the bail to enable the prosecution to conclude investigation into the alleged crime.

    The lawyer said if the defendant was kept in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS), he would assist in the investigation process.

    Akposeyi claimed that there was never a time the prosecution flouted the court’s order as it was claimed by the defence counsel.

    Defence counsel Mr. Ahmed Raji (SAN) opposed the oral application.

    He alleged that the prosecution flouted the order of the court by laying siege on his client’s residence and preventing him from travelling as ordered by the court.

    Justice Adeniyi Ademola adjourned the case to December 8 for continuation of hearing.

  • ‘Abia Catholic Church not against Appeal Court judges’

    The Knights of St. Mulumba of the Umuahia Catholic Church have distanced themselves and the church from the position of a group called the Catholic Network of Nigeria (CNN) requesting for the removal of the Owerri Appeal Court judges due to lack of confidence in them.

    Reacting to the media campaign in which the protesting group is calling for a change of the Appeal Court judges, the Liaison Grand Knight of Umuahia, Sir Nwanevu Christopher said the Catholic Church is not a partisan group and does not support partisan politics or the aspiration of any political party.

    According to him, what the Catholic Church does is to advise politicians to play by the rule just as it did before the last elections by inviting candidates of various political parties to say what they intended to do for the people.

    To that end, he said that the Catholic Church has nothing to do with the decisions of the court and does not set up groups to interfere in such matters, adding that the church has no right to direct the actions of judges of a court.

    He made it clear that the said group is not known or directed by the church to embark on such protest, stressing that the Catholic Church cannot support the protest or be part of its campaign of calumny.

    Sir Nwanevu stated that no Catholic Church bishop or member will support the ugly act, maintaining that the Catholic Church will react to the development.

    Reacting to the issue, the chief press secretary to the Governor, Mr. Godwin Adindu said investigations revealed that the group is a contraption by desperate politicians of the opposition All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA) to drag the church into unnecessary politics.

    According to Adindu, the aim of the group is to use the name of the church to settle political scores, something he said is ungodly.

    He said that the Catholic Church is a non-partisan organisation that stands for social justice, good governance and the progress of the society, adding that the church respects the rule of law and as a responsible institution cannot be instigated into denigrating the sanctity of the judiciary.

    Adindu said the state government has urged the Catholic institution in the state and country to rise in condemnation of the ill-conceived attempt by some infinitesimal group in Bende community to drag its name in the mud.

  • FRC urges court to dismiss KPMG’s suit

    FRC urges court to dismiss KPMG’s suit

    • Case to be heard Monday

    The Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria (FRC) has urged the Federal High Court in Lagos to dismiss a suit filed against it by KPMG Professional Services.

    The firm and a partner, Ayodele Othihiwa, are praying the court to stop FRC from sanctioning them over their role in the financial statements of Stanbic IBTC Holdings.

    Hearing in the suit could not go on yesterday after the plaintiffs’ lawyer Mr. Babatunde Fagbohunlu (SAN) informed Justice Ibrahim Buba that he filed a new application.

    The application, he said, is a further affidavit opposing FRC’s Notice of Preliminary Objection.

    The respondent’s lawyer, Mr Norrison Quakers (SAN), said he needed time to respond.

    “I’ve just been served. I’ll not be opposing the application,” he said.

    FRC is praying the court to dismiss the suit in its entirety because the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain it.

    The council is contending that the applicants’ Originating Motion discloses no cause of action against it.

    FRC said it merely performed its statutory functions and duties and cannot be stopped from doing so.

    The council said the plaintiffs did not appeal to FRC’s Technical and Oversight Committee or exhaust laid down procedures for resolution of disputes before filing the suit.

    In effect, it said the plaintiffs did not comply with “a condition precedent before initiating, instituting or commencing legal action.”

    Besides, FRC said the applicants’ right to fair hearing was not infringed on because KPMG was “given the opportunity for fair hearing.”

    Justice Buba had on November 6 restrained FRC from imposing any sanction on KPMG until the firm’s suit was determined.

    He barred FRC’s Executive Secretary Mr. Jim Obazee from sanctioning Othihiwa.

    FRC, in an October 30 letter, conveyed its ‘regulatory decision’ to the applicants, following their role in the financial statements of Stanbic IBTC Holdings Plc for 2013 and 2014.

    The council said it had suspended Othihiwa “until the investigation as to the extent of the negligence of KPMG Professional Services is ascertained.”

    KPMG and Othihiwa said the FRC’s decision was published and issued without informing or notifying them of the nature of the allegations made against them, nor were they invited to respond to the allegations.