Tag: Court

  • Divestment: Bayelsa monarch battles SPDC in $3b suit

    Divestment: Bayelsa monarch battles SPDC in $3b suit

    A Federal High Court, sitting in Yenagoa Judicial Division, Yenagoa, yesterday, granted an application brought by HRH Bubaye Dakolo, Agada 1V, Ibenanowei of Ekpetiama Kingdom, Bayelsa in a three billion dollars suit against international oil giant, Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC), seeking leave to serve the defendants by substituted means.

    Justice Ayo Emmanuel adjourned the matter for hearing to 22nd July.

    Joined in the suit marked FHC/ YEN/ CS/81/2025 are seven defendants, including 1st defendant Shell Petroleum Development Company, 2nd Shell NV, 3rd Shell Plc, 4th Attorney General of the Federation,5th Nigeria Upstream Regulatory Agency, 6th Minister of Petroleum Resources and 7th Renaissance African Energy Ltd.

    Read Also: Tinubu: every Nigerian will feel impact of good governance

    The plaintiff is HRH Bubaye Dakolo, Agada 1V, Ibenanowei of Ekpetiama Kingdom (suing for himself and on behalf of the leadership and members of Ekpetiama Kingdom.

    Among the plaintiff’s claims in a writ of summons: a declaration that the sale of onshore and shallow waters oil and gas assets to the 7th defendant (Renaissance African Energy Ltd) was executed without strict compliance with the mandatory provisions of the Petroleum Industry Act 2021.

    A declaration that failure of 1st, 2nd, 3rd  defendants to carry out an Environmental Impact Assessment Plan, Host Communities Development Plan, Decommissioning and Abandonment Plan violates the Petroleum Industry Act.

    Other claims includes a declaration that the exclusion of Ekpetiama Kingdom and its leadership from the divestment process amounts to a denial of their Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) under international law and renders the divestment process procedurally and legally defective.

    The Royal Father, who spoke with reporters in Yenagoa, said he approached the court to exercise his fundamental human rights to exist, given the devastating effects of oil exploration in his kingdom and SPDC’s divestment plans which violates the Petroleum Industry Act.

    He said life expectancy in his kingdom is 40 years which he said was below the national average, adding that medical records show a spike in cases of cancer disease in his kingdom.

  • Alleged attempted murder: Court threatens to revoke bail granted 20 NUPENG ex-leaders

    Alleged attempted murder: Court threatens to revoke bail granted 20 NUPENG ex-leaders

    A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Maitama has threatened to revoke the bail granted to 20 ex-leaders of the Petroleum Tanker Drivers (PTD) branch of the Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG) being tried for attempted murder.

    Justice Halilu Yusuf issued the threat on Wednesday upon his observation that the defence team appeared not to be taking the case seriously.

    Justice Yusuf also threatened to remand the defendants in a correctional centre in order to ensure that the defence team takes the case seriously as required.

    Also, the judge, during Wednesday’s proceedings, agreed with prosecuting lawyer, David Kaswe, that the trial in the case should proceed in the absence of the 19th defendant, Adamu Ibrahim Umaru, who is currently being held in Calabar prison over a separate offence.

    At the commencement of proceedings, Kaswe drew the court’s attention that Umaru had not attended the last three proceedings.

    He urged the court to invoke Section 352(4) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) to order that the trial in the case should proceed in the absence of the 19th defendant. 

    Defence lawyer, Abubakar Sani, objected to Kaswe’s application, arguing that the provision of Section 352(4) of ACJA was not applicable in the present situation.

    Sani said Umaru was being held in the custody of the correctional facility in Calabar, and his movement was being restricted.

    He added that the 19th defendant was being kept away from the court by circumstances beyond his control, noting that by the provision of the Constitution, Umaru was still presumed innocent.

    In his reply, Kaswe noted that there was no document placed before the court to explain Umaru’s absence and that his absence was intended to stall the speedy trial of the case.

    Ruling, Justice Halilu noted that bail is a constitutional right of a defendant and in granting bail to a defendant, the court always ensures that certain conditions are attached to ensure the defendant is always present in court for trial.

    He held that bail is a contractual agreement between the court and the defendant, adding that the absence of the 19th defendant is a breach of such contract as well as the conditions of his bail which bar him from committing another crime.

    The judge held that the court agreed with the submission of the prosecution that the provision of ACJA should be applied in the circumstances.

    He then ordered that the case should proceed in the absence of the 19th defendant in line with the provisions of ACJA.

    After the ruling, the second prosecution witness (PW2), Williams Akporeha, was invited to conclude his evidence-in-chief, following which the judge adjourned till July 9 for the cross-examination of the witness.

    The 20 defendants, including a former PTD National Chairman, Lucky Osesua and 18 others, are being tried on a five-count criminal charge bordering on attempted murder, breach of peace and assault.

    Read Also: CISLAC, ICPC seek full implementation of Supreme Court ruling on LG autonomy

    They were in the charged marked: CR/042/2023, accused of acting “in a manner likely to cause the death of one Comrade Wiliams Akporeha and Comrade Augustine Egbon”, when they laid siege at PTD’s office at No. 50 Moses Majekodenmi Crescent, Utako District in Abuja on November 1, 2023.

    The defendants were also accused of voluntarily causing grievous bodily harm to Comrade Williams Akporeha, Comrade Olawale Afolabi, Comrade Solomon Kilanko and Comrade Augustine Egbon.

    While testifying in the case on October 23, 2024, the President of NUPENG, Williams Akporeha, gave details on how he and other senior members of the union were allegedly attacked by the defendants, adding that he narrowly escaped being killed.

    Akporeha said, but for the efforts of security personnel, he would have been killed or subjected to the violent attacks that nearly claimed the lives of the union’s Secretary General, Wale Afolabi and the newly elected National Chairman of the Petroleum Tanker Drivers (PTD) branch of NUPENG, Augustine Egbon.

  • Man in court for allegedly stealing neighbour’s car in Kaduna

    Man in court for allegedly stealing neighbour’s car in Kaduna

    A man, Edward Innocent, 37, who allegedly stole his neighbour’s car worth N6.5million, on Thursday, appeared  before a Kaduna Magistrates’ Court.

    The defendant, a resident of Kamazou in Kaduna, was in court on charges of conspiracy and stealing, to which he pleaded not guilty.

    The Prosecutor, Insp Chidi Leo, told the court that Innocent and others now at large, allegedly stole a car belonging to his neighbour, Blessed Timothy, who had travelled.

    Leo said the defendant stole one Lexus Jeep with registration number KAD 442 GN valued at N6.5million.

    The prosecutor said that when arrested, the defendant during investigation confessed to have stolen the car.

    According to him, Innocent informed the investigators that he gave the vehicle to his friend to sell it for him.

    The prosecutor said that the offences contravened sections 78 and 217 of the Penal Code of Kaduna State, 2017.

    Read Also: Alleged contempt: Court orders service of charge, others on INEC chairman

    “Section 217 prescribes five years jail term for stealing if found guilty.

    The Magistrate, Mr Ibrahim Emmanuel, granted the defendant bail in the sum of N500,000 with two sureties in like sum.

    Emmanuel said that the sureties should be gainfully employed and show evidence of payment of tax to Kaduna Government for the past two consecutive years.

    The case was thereafter adjourned until July 24 for hearing.

    (NAN)

  • Alleged contempt: Court orders service of charge, others on INEC chairman

    Alleged contempt: Court orders service of charge, others on INEC chairman

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered substituted service on the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Mahmood Yakubu, of all documents relating to a contempt proceeding initiated against him by one of the nation’s political parties, the National Rescue Movement (NRM).

    In a ruling on Tuesday, Justice Obiora Egwuatu granted leave to NRM to serve the Form 48 (notice of the consequence of disobedience of a court order) and all other documents on the INEC Chairman by delivering them to any staff of the commission at its national headquarters in Abuja.

    Justice Egwuatu ordered the NRM to ensure that the name of the person who received the documents on behalf of Prof. Yakubu is disclosed in the affidavit of service to be filed in the court later.

    The judge adjourned till July 15 for mention.

    The ruling was on an ex parte motion moved on Tuesday by NRM’s lawyer, Oladimeji Ekengba, who claimed that INEC and Prof. Yakubu failed to comply with an order of mandamus made by the court on March 5, directing them to accept the outcome of an emergency national convention that produced Chief Edozie Njoku as the National Chairman of the NRM.

    Ekengba said the essence of the emergency national convention, held on January 17, was to fill existing vacancy and correct the lopsidedness in the National Executive Committee (NEC) of the NRM.

    He said the NRM requests that the court’s Registrar issue Form 48 to be served on INEC Chairman in order for him to show a cause why he should not be committed to prison for failing to comply with the court’s judgment.

    Ekengba said his client resorted to substituted service on realising that it would be impossible to hand the processes to him personally.

    “I know that the bailiff of this court will not be able to serve the Chairman of the respondent/judgement debtor (INEC) the Form 48 personally as the respondent only receive processes (court documents) at the gate at a designated registry at Plot 430, Zambezi Crescent Off Aguiyi Ironsi Street Maitama Abuja.

    “The judgment debtor/respondent’s Chairman has put in place numerous protocols and the bailiff of this court will not be able to serve him the Form 48 issued by this honourable court

    “From the disposition of the judgment debtor/respondent, it is practically impossible to serve its Chairman with the Form 48 personally as required by law.”

    Read Also: Ex-Appeal Court Justice seeks more investment in sports

    In a protest letter earlier sent to Prof. Yakuubu by the party’s lawyer, Joe Agi (SAN), NRM said Njoku and other members of its NEC were elected on January 17, 2025, at the emergency national convention of the party held in Abuja.

    It added that since the emergence of Chief Njoku as the National Chairman of NRM, INEC and its Chairman have allegedly refused to recognise him and the NEC members as leaders of the party despite a subsisting order of the Federal High Court, directing INEC to recognise them.

    On January 16 Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court, Abuja issued an order mandating INEC to “monitor and accept” the outcome of NRM’s emergency convention held on January 17.

    Following delay by INEC to recognise the leadership that emerged from the January 17 convention, the NRM went back to court and, on March 5, Justice Egwuatu issued the order of mandamus, compelling INEC and its Chairman to recognise the Chief Njoku-led NEC of the party.

  • I owned the laptop, not Ataga, Chidinma tells Court

    I owned the laptop, not Ataga, Chidinma tells Court

    A Lagos State High Court sitting at the Tafawa Balewa Square yesterday heard fresh testimony from Chidinma Ojukwu, the alleged killer of Super TV Chief Executive Officer, Usifo Ataga, as she denied stealing the deceased’s mobile phones and laptop.

    Ojukwu, a 23-year-old former Mass Communication student of the University of Lagos, told the court that the electronic devices recovered by the police belonged to her and not the late businessman.

    She continued her defence before Justice Yetunde Adesanya, insisting on her ownership of the items. Ojukwu is standing trial alongside Adedapo Quadri and her sister, Chioma Egbuchu, on charges bordering on murder, theft, and forgery, over the 2021 killing of Ataga.

    Taking the witness stand, Ojukwu told the court that while Ataga was in possession of a MacBook Pro 13-inch (2020 model), she owned a MacBook Pro 16-inch, Core i7 (2019) with 16GB RAM and 512GB SSD, along with an HP laptop. She confirmed one of the laptops shown in court was hers and said it was among items recovered by the police.

    When asked if she had proof of ownership, Ojukwu said she did but added that the receipt went missing after a police search of her home.

    She admitted to visiting a computer shop on June 18, 2021, where she attempted to sell the MacBook Pro, claiming the device was gifted to her by one Mr. Fredrick, whom she had lost contact with since her arrest. According to her, the receipt was among several personal items that went missing during the police search.

    Read Also: Tuggar expresses Nigeria’s readiness to host WAES

    Responding to questions about a prosecution witness’s allegation that she swapped Usifo Ataga’s original phone pouch with a fake one valued at N1,000, Ojukwu told the court that the pouch in question was actually hers.

    She added that she had previously shared a photo of it on her Instagram handle, @iamdorable. Her lawyer, Onwuka Egwu, tendered screenshots of the Instagram post, which Ojukwu confirmed in court. The court admitted the images as evidence.

    She also clarified that, during her time with the deceased, she had an iPhone 11 Pro and another iPhone Xx, while an iPhone 7 remained at home. Although she lost receipts for most of her phones, she tendered the one for the iPhone Xx, which was admitted into evidence as Exhibit P25. She also confirmed ownership of a bag containing the phone, ATM cards, pad, voter’s card, and other personal items.

    When cross-examined on call records showing she made about 15 calls between June 13 and 18, 2021, nine of which were to co-defendant Adedapo Quadri, Ojukwu admitted the calls, stating they were related to ongoing transactions and other personal dealings.

    She explained that in May 2021, a friend had asked for help with obtaining an international passport and driver’s license. During a call with the friend, Quadri phoned her regarding a clothing delivery, and she added him to the conversation. Quadri, she said, claimed to have contacts who could process the documents. Arrangements were made, and subsequent follow-up calls between them were related to the delivery of those items.

    Ojukwu also denied forging any documents, including bank statements, a driver’s license, or an international passport. She maintained that the two bank statements found by the police were hers and authentic. She confirmed ownership of her genuine driver’s license and passport but stated that a driver’s license bearing the name “Mary Johnson” did not belong to her.

    The court admitted these documents as exhibits and adjourned the case to October 6 for continuation of trial.

  • Court asked to stop demolition of 18.8-hectare estate for Lagos-Calabar coastal road project

    Court asked to stop demolition of 18.8-hectare estate for Lagos-Calabar coastal road project

    A Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, has been urged to restrain the Federal Government and its contractors from demolishing an 18.8-hectare estate in Okun-Ajah, Eti-Osa, to make way for the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Road project, pending the outcome of a legal suit.

    The suit, marked FHC/L/CS/1063/25, was filed by the Foreign Investors Network of Nigeria, owners of the affected property, against the Attorney General of the Federation, the Minister of Works, the Controller of Works in Lagos, and HITECH Construction Company.

    In its originating processes, the plaintiff asserted ownership of the 18.8385 hectares of land, backed by a Certificate of Occupancy and a valid survey plan (Plan No BOM/3538/001B/2024/LA/TOPO). It accused the government of realigning the road through its estate without proper approval or due process.

    The landowners are asking the court to determine whether the government and its contractors acted lawfully in altering the route of the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Road between Chainage 16 + 500 and 17 + 500, a shift that allegedly brings the project into direct conflict with their developed property, Winhomes Global Services Estate.

    The plaintiff claims that “at no time was it issued with any statutory notice, demolition order, or opportunity to be heard,” adding that the actions of the defendants constitute a “gross violation of the Plaintiff’s constitutional rights as enshrined in Sections 36 and 44 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).”

    According to the suit, the land, measuring 18.8385 hectares, is fully documented with a valid Certificate of Occupancy, a Governor’s consent, a survey plan (Plan No: BOM/3538/001B/2024/LA/TOPO), and relevant building approvals. The estate has also reportedly been subscribed to by multiple allottees under power of attorney agreements.

    In the written address supporting the summons, counsel to the Plaintiff, Valerian Nadike of Valerian Viannay & Partners, argued that “no notice or hearing was afforded before the commencement of the destructive markings on its property,” adding that such omission violates the principle of audi alteram partem and fundamental human rights.

    “The attempted demolition of the Plaintiff’s estate without a lawful acquisition process, valid gazette, or compensation, amounts to executive lawlessness,” Nadike stated in court filings, citing Ojukwu v. Governor of Lagos State (1986) as authority. “No state authority, no matter how well-intentioned, can ride roughshod over constitutional rights.”

    Read Also: JUST IN: 753 Abuja housing units: Court grants Emefiele N2b bail

    The Plaintiff is seeking nine reliefs, including: A declaration that the actions of the Defendants in “marking for destruction and demolition the Plaintiff’s property without recourse to any legal or lawful basis is illegal, null and void,”

    An injunction restraining the Defendants from further acts that interfere with the estate, and

    An order awarding ₦900 million in damages for what the Plaintiff describes as the “unlawful marking, threat of demolition, and interference with its property.”

    In part of the originating summons seen by our reporter, the Plaintiff asked:

    “Whether the actions of the 2nd to 4th Defendants in seeking to demolish and destroy the property of the Plaintiff at Okun-Ajah, despite not having contravened the coastal road alignment, is not a discrimination against the Plaintiff and a contravention of Section 42 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

    It further contends that the realignment of the road was not in compliance with the 2004/2006 approved alignment, and that any attempt to enforce a new route affecting the estate amounts to “an illegality and is therefore null and void ab initio.”

    Among the documents attached to the suit are copies of the Certificate of Occupancy, survey plan, Governor’s clearance, and photographs of the property showing markings allegedly made by agents of the government, and letters of protest previously sent to the Ministry of Works.

    The Plaintiff is also seeking a mandatory order directing the Federal Ministry of Works to “fully comply with the law with regard to the issuance of statutory notices, if at all there is any contravention,” before taking any enforcement or demolition action.

    “This matter raises fundamental questions about how far the government can go in executing infrastructure without trampling on the rights of citizens and law-abiding companies. If such actions go unchecked, they set a dangerous precedent,” Nadike submitted.

    No date had been fixed for a hearing; however, the defendants were said to have thirty days from the date of service to file their appearance and response.

  • JUST IN: 753 Abuja housing units: Court grants Emefiele N2b bail

    JUST IN: 753 Abuja housing units: Court grants Emefiele N2b bail

    A HIgh Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) on Monday granted bail at N2billion to a former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Godwin Emefiele.

    Justice Halilu Yusuf, in a ruling, granted the bail after Emefiele was arraigned on an eight-count charge in which he is accused of among others, unlawfully acquiring a housing estate comprising 753 units, allegedly stealing and taking control of billions of naira in proxy accounts.

    Justice Yusuf noted that Emefiele had been granted bail in three other criminal cases pending against him and that there was no evidence that he had jumped bail.

    Read Also: EFCC slams Emefiele with fresh charges over 753 Abuja housing units

    He then proceeded to admit the ex-CBN governorto bail on the condition that he must produce two sureties, who must own property worth N2billion in either Aolsoko, Maitama or Wuse 2  within the jurisdiction of the court.

    Justice Yusuf ordered Emefiele to submit his travel documents to the court and directed that he must perfect the bail by next Wednesday, failing which he would be remanded in custody.

    The ruling was on the bail application moved by his lawyer, Matthew Burkaa (SAN), which was not objected to by prosecuting lawyer, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), who urged the court to impose additional conditions deferent from the ones earlier given by the other courts.

    Details shortly…

  • Court rejects FG’s application for bench warrant against Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan

    Court rejects FG’s application for bench warrant against Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan

    The Federal High Court, Abuja, on Monday, rejected an application by the Federal Government to issue a bench warrant against suspended Kogi Central Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan in an alleged defamation case against her.

    The government is prosecuting Akpoti-Uduaghan on behalf of Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi Governor, Yahaya Bello.

    When the matter was called on Monday, the prosecuting counsel, Mr. D.D. Kasue, told the court that the matter was for arraignment but that the defendant was not in court.

    Kasue told the court that he served the charge on the defendant’s counsel which meant that the defendant was well aware of the matter.

    The prosecutor prayed the court for a bench warrant to be issued against the defendant for failing to appear in court in spite of being aware of the charge against her.

    “It was this morning that we were able to serve the defendant through her counsel but the defendant is not in court.

    “So it means the defendant is aware of this matter but decided not to appear in court, in the light of this, I apply that a bench warrant be issued against her for failure to attend court to take her plea in this criminal charge,” Kasue said.

    Counsel to Akpoti-Uduaghan, Mr Jacob Usman, SAN, in a swift reaction, told the court that he found the application of the prosecution strange and uncourteous.

    Usman told the court that when he got wind of the pendency of the suit, he called the prosecutor to let him know that his client had asked him to receive the charge on her behalf.

    “I was served the charge at 9:15 this morning here in court so how will the defendant know that the matter is coming up when she has not seen the charge?

    “I find the application strange and it should be dishonoured, if the defendant has not been served, she cannot be in court,” he said.

    He prayed the court to dis-countenance the application as it was made in bad taste.

    The trial judge, Justice Musa Umar, asked the prosecutor if he had served the charge on the defendant to which he answered in the negative.

    Read Also: Alleged defamation: Yahaya Bello Petitions IGP, demands investigation, prosecution of Sen Akpoti-Uduaghan

    Justice Umar, therefore, said that it was impossible to grant the application of the prosecutor and issue a bench warrant for the arrest of the defendant when she had not been served.

    He refused the application for a bench warrant and rather granted the application for substituted service through her counsel which the prosecutor made in what seemed to be an afterthought.

    The judge adjourned the matter until June 30 for arraignment.

    The News Agency of Nigeria, (NAN) reports that the case is not unconnected  to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s alleged defamatory comments made during a live TV appearance on Channels Television’s on April 3, 2025.

    She allegedly made defamatory comments against Akpabio and Bello including a plot to assassinate her.

    (NAN)

  • Radio Biafra: Court admits transmitter allegedly smuggled into Nigeria by Kanu

    Radio Biafra: Court admits transmitter allegedly smuggled into Nigeria by Kanu

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has admitted in evidence a radio transmitter allegedly smuggled into the country by the detained self acclaimed leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.

    Justice James Omotosho admitted the transmitter along with a 20-foot container on which it was allegedly brought into the country from London, without relevant Customs documentations.

    Justice Omotosho admitted the container as Exhibit PWY and the radio transmitter as Exhibit PWZ during a brief proceeding conducted on Friday within the premises of the headmasters of the Department of State Services (DSS) in Abuja.

    The decision of the court to conduct the proceeding in the DSS headquarters was informed by an oral application by prosecuting lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), who prayed the court to inspect the transmitter and container which was kept in the DSS’ facility.

    Awomolo made the application midway into the testimony of the fourth prosecution witness, who among others, testified about how the transmitter and container were recovered in a premises in Ubuluisiuzor in Ihiala Local Government of Anambra State.

    The prosecuting lawyer said it was impossible for the prosecution to bring the transmitter and the container to the court premises and urged the court to relocate to where they are kept for the purpose of sighting and for the prosecution to tender them.

    Defence lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN) did not object to Awomolo’s application which was subsequently granted by the judge.

    Earlier in his testimony, the fourth prosecution witness, a DSS agent, told the court that he knew Kanu as the leader of IPOB, a group campaigning for the sessision of the South Eastern states, parts of the South South states, Benue and Kogi states from Nigeria to form a Biafra Republic.

    He said Kanu utilised his Radio Biafra to propagate his messages and incite his followers to engage in violence and other terrorism activities.

    The witness, who said he was among those who investigated the allegations against Kanu, told the court that sometimes in October 15, his agency got intelligence that Kanu smuggled into the country an FM radio transmitter, in a container.

    He said the transmitter, which was concealed among household items in the container, was not declared to the Nigeria Customs and that It was to be used for Radio Biafra.

    The witness said he later saw a video where the defendant (Kanu) and one of his associates, Benjamin Madubugu were inspecting the transmitter l, which they described as a game changer.

    “After I watched the video, I was instructed to obtain a warrant, locate the transmitter and relocate it,” the witness said, adding that himself and others located the transmitter in the premises where Modubugu lived with his family and a brother named Francis and relocated it.

    He said when the search warrant, obtained from a Chief Magistrates Court in Ihiala, Anambra State was executed in the residence of Benjamin Madubugu at Ubuluisiuzor, they found the radio transmitter in a 20-feet container; two pump action guns (without licenses), lap top computers, some ammunition, small quantity of marijuana, among others.

    “The transmitter was concealed with household items, including second hand clothes. When we asked Benjamin about the other items that we saw in the video, he said one Chimezie came to take them away.

    Awomolo subsequently tendered a video recording, showing Kanu, inspecting the container and its contents, including the transmitter. 

    The video showed Kanu, being assisted by an individual and being recorded by another, opened the container, identified all its contents and explained how the transmitter would be deployed.

    The video also showed Kanu, while his hand on the transmitter and said: “This is the monster itself. This is what will destroy enemies of Biafra…this is nuclear munster that will destroy the zoo.”

    When asked what Kanu meant by “the zoo,” the witness said the defendant was referring to Nigeria.

    The witness said Kanu inspected the container in Madubugu’s premises in Ubuluisiuzor in Ihiala, Anambra State.

    He said after recovering the transmitter, they arrested Madubugu, who later made statement, drailing how the container got to his premises.

    The statement, written by Madubugu on November 3, 2015, was admitted in evidence by the court and later read by the witness.

    In the statement, Madubugu admitted among others, that he agreed to house the container on the grounds that he will keep it (the container) after all the contents have been evacuated.

    Madubugu said Kanu came to inspect that container and said it would be used to broadcast Radio Biafra activities.

    He added that Kanu came to his house with Chimezie between March and April 2015 to make the video of the inspection of the container.

    The witness said Madubugu was later arraigned with Kanu before the former judge handling the case, Justice Binta Nyako. He added that the joint trial was later separated when Kanu jumped bail, adding that Madubugu is still on trial before Justice Nyako.

    PW4 who said he once served in the South East, told the court that the activities of members of IPOB and its military wing, the Eastern Security Network (ESN) have greatly hamperee the socio-economic life of that part of the country.

    The witness said: “ESN is the military arm of IPOB. All ESN members are IPOB members, but not all IPOB members are ESN. 

    “They carry out instructions of the defendant, which he broadcast through Radio Biafra. They are trained in the act of gorilla warfare.

    “They engage in acts of terrorism.

    They maim, kill and propergate hate against other ethnic groups, particularly the Hausa/Fulani.”

    The witness said his agency has a desk assigned to monitor a d record every broadcast made by Kanu on Radio Biafra.

    Awomolo later tendered some audio recordings of the broadcast, which the court admitted in evidence.

    In one of the broadcast, which the defendant made on May 29, 2021, used disparaging words in describing Minister of Works, David Umahi, former Governor of Imo State, Rochas Okorocha and his successor, Hope Uzodinma 

    He described South East political leaders as fools, vagabonds and idiots and proceeded to declare a sit at home for May 31, 2021.

    Kanu warned that anybody who disobeys his sit at home order venture out of his or her house on the said day will die.

     “If you come out on the 31 you are going to die and if the zoo army tries anything they will be confronted,” Kanu said, claiming that “the Nigerian Army is made up of cowards, who always attack civilians.”

    In another broadcast he made on May 30, Kanu called for complete and total lockdown in the south east and warned that who ever opens his or her shop will be burnt with the shop.

    Read Also: Kanu ‘honoured’ as Egypt’s Pyramids crowned African champions

    In his broadcast on May 31, Kanu was heard telling his followers that he did not asked them to attack businesses in the area, but to focus on their enemies. 

    The PW4 said he knew a commander of ESN called Nwokike Anyinayo Andy, who was popularly known as Ikonso, but killed by security forces on the 24, April 2021 in his home town, Awomama, Oru East Local Government of Imo State.

    The witness said Kanu did a broadcast on April 25, 2021 in which he mourned the death of Ikonso, spoke highly of him and vowed that there shall be repercussion.

    Kanu claimed that Ikonso was killed in his sleep in his home by state security personnel and not on the battlefield.

    Said Ikonso would be mourned in a very special way and will be buried in a very special way.

    The witness told the court that in one of his broadcasts, Kanu claimed that Ikonso would be buried with 2000 heads, but that when they arrested an IPOB member – Emeyiri Uzoma Benjamin known as Onye Army – he made statement and said they were only able to get 30 heads.

    The prosecution tendered through the witness a publication in Vanguard newspaper, detailing the alleged statement made by Benjamin.

    Further hearing in the case has been adjourned till June 18, 19 and 20 within which the prosecution is expected to close its case.

  • Court orders EKEDC to restore hotel’s electricity

    Court orders EKEDC to restore hotel’s electricity

    The Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered Eko Electricity Distribution Plc to immediately reconnect the electricity supply to Protea Hotel by Marriott, Kuramo Waters, Victoria Island, Lagos.

    The court heard it was allegedly disconnected unlawfully at about 11 a.m. on June 5.

    Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke issued the interim order based on an ex-parte application by Chief Ajibola Aribisala (SAN), on behalf of Princely Court Limited, franchise owner of the Protea Hotel by Marriott at Kuramo Waters.

    The motion was supported by an affidavit deposed to by the hotel’s Operations Manager, Sotayo Olasubomi Oluwabukunolami.

    EKEDC, Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), Rekhiat Momoh, Samuel Edoho, Abdulkadir Abdulrahman, and Agbioghale Emmanuel are the defendants.

    The court granted: “An order directing the defendants to forthwith reconnect the plaintiff’s electricity supply at the Kuramo Waters premises;

    Read Also: Democracy Day: Nigerians’ expectations

    “An injunction restraining the defendants, jointly or severally, from tampering with or further disconnecting the electricity supply to the plaintiff’s premises;

    “An injunction restraining the defendants from tampering with the electricity meter currently installed at the premises;

    “An order mandating the third to sixth defendants to comply with all court orders concerning reconnection of electricity to the plaintiff’s premises upon being served with the court’s order.”

    The order is to subsist pending the hearing and determination of the plaintiff’s motion on notice for interlocutory injunction.

    Justice Aneke adjourned till June 25 for a hearing of the Motion on Notice.