Tag: Court

  • Court to resolve paternity dispute

    Court to resolve paternity dispute

    The children of the late Engineer George Osazoga Idah have issued a firm response to recent statements made by Chief Osaro concerning the ongoing legal dispute over the late engineer’s estate.

    In a suit marked B/233/2025, the plaintiffs, Mark Idah and Omoruyi Idah, filed the case on behalf of themselves and other children of the late Engr. George Idah. The defendant is Chief Osaro Idah, a Benin Palace Chief, whom they are challenging over claims to the late engineer’s properties.

    The plaintiffs contend that the defendant did not have a legally or customarily recognized relationship with their late father during his lifetime. They allege that there was no acknowledged paternity or formal familial ties established under Benin native law and custom before their father’s passing.

    In a detailed statement made available to the press by the siblings, the family expressed concern over what they described as “falsehoods, baseless claims, and personal attacks” directed at them by Chief Osaro. Although they had previously refrained from public commentary out of respect for judicial proceedings, they stated that the seriousness of the allegations necessitated a public clarification.

    “Out of deep respect for due process and the sanctity of the courts, we have, until now, chosen not to engage in public commentary. However, the torrent of falsehoods, baseless claims, and personal attacks issued by Chief Osaro compels us to set the record straight. Let it be stated without equivocation: this matter is before a competent court of law.

    “No amount of media manipulation, emotional blackmail, or character assassination will substitute for facts and legal truth. As the saying goes, no matter how long falsehood travels, truth will eventually catch up with it. We remain confident that, through proper judicial scrutiny, the truth will emerge, backed by evidence, not empty rhetoric,” the statement read.

    At the heart of the dispute is the issue of Chief Osaro’s paternity, which the Idah family insists must be resolved through a scientific process. They challenged Osaro to submit to an independent DNA test, a request they claim he continues to evade.

    Read Also: Economist tasks youth to change Nigeria’s negative story to wealth creation

    “What remains most telling in Chief Osaro’s statement is his continued refusal to confront the central question before the court, his paternity. If he is indeed the biological son of our late father, he should have no hesitation in submitting to an independent DNA test. Instead, he avoids the issue altogether. This silence is not only suspicious, it is damning. A simple forensic test would resolve this matter conclusively, yet he continues to hide behind deflection and distractions,” the family asserted.

    The statement further emphasized that all recognized children of Engineer Idah are alive, mentally sound, and prepared to affirm the truth both in court and before the public.

    “We wish to make it absolutely clear that all known children of our late father are alive, mentally sound, and fully capable of affirming the truth, not only before the court, but before the public if necessary. Our father’s legacy is not up for revision, nor can it be hijacked through a campaign of intimidation and false entitlement.

    “Furthermore, Chief Osaro’s personal attacks on our brother, Mark Idah, are nothing more than a smokescreen, a transparent attempt to discredit voices that challenge his narrative.

    These petty assaults on character reveal just how far he is willing to go in his bid to lay claim to what is not lawfully his. Such tactics do not intimidate us; they only expose the desperation and moral bankruptcy behind them,” they said.

    Reiterating their belief in the legal system, the family urged the public to exercise patience and await the court’s decision.

    “This dispute is not about media headlines or public sympathy, it is about truth, justice, and legacy. Our late father, Engineer George Osazoga Idah, was a respected leader whose memory and estate must be honored with dignity, not dragged through the mud of personal vendettas. We urge the public to remain calm and trust the legal process. We will meet Chief Osaro in court, where truth is not determined by volume, but by evidence, integrity, and law.”

  • Alleged $2.6m, N3.5b fraud: court fixes May 5 for arraignment

    Alleged $2.6m, N3.5b fraud: court fixes May 5 for arraignment

    Ogunlaya Abiola

    Justice Rahman Oshodi of an Ikeja Special Offences Court has fixed May 5 for the arraignment of a business man, Friday Audu accused of $2.6 million USDT and N3.5 billion fraud retention.

    Audu is to be arraigned alongside his company, Genting International Limited on a seven-count charge bordering on retention of stolen property, forgery and possession of fraudulent documents, proferred against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC).

    When the case was called yesterday, EFCC Counsel, Mrs Bilikisu Buhari informed  the court  that  the  case was slated for the arraignment of the defendants.

    Dr. Muiz Banire (SAN) appeared for the first defendant (Audu) while the second defendant (Genting International Ltd) was however, not represented by any counsel.

    Buhari informed  the court  that  the first defendant resisted service and representation on behalf of the second defendant.

    The prosecution thereafter sought the leave of the court to serve hearing notice on the last known address of the second defendant.

    Read Also: Tinubu’s policies can transform Nigeria if backed by accountability – Methodist Bishop

    Justice Oshodi granted request of the prosecution and adjourned the case until May 5 for arraignment.

    According to the charge sheet dated April 15, 2026,EFCC alleged Audu and his company retained stolen property by conspiring among themselves to retain $1,262,000 USDT in the wallet address TP6UTEmch6cto72Y7Pj3Bkn84LSqjSr7PX (binance), property fraudulently obtained.

    The anti-graft agency also alleged that the defendants retained $1,300,203 USDT  in  the wallet address TQbgiFXAf17RX8j2nkFwwzBDo22WWrdcRn (BYBIT), property fraudulently obtained.

    The commission also submitted that the defendants conspired amongst themselves to dishonestly retain in Genting International Co. Ltd’s account number 0225100403 domiciled in Union Bank the sum of N3.5 billion funds fraudulently obtained.

    EFCC also alleged the defendant sometimes in 2024 knowingly forged a document titled “Ultimate Beneficial Ownership (UBO) Declaration Form” and purpoted same to have been signed by one Mr Baffale Yakubu.

    According to the prosecution, the alleged offences violate Sections 328, 365 and 411 of the Criminal Law of Lagos state, 2011 and Sections 6 and 1(3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other fraud related Offences Act, 2006.

  • UPDATED: Court sentences Osinachi’s husband to death by hanging

    UPDATED: Court sentences Osinachi’s husband to death by hanging

    Barely 35 months after the death of popular gospel singer Osinachi Nwachukwu, Justice Nwosu-Iheme of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Wuse Zone 2, Abuja, has sentenced her husband, Peter Nwachukwu, to death by hanging.

    Nwachukwu was found guilty of culpable homicide in connection with the death of his wife on April 8, 2022.

    Delivering judgment on Monday, the judge ruled that the prosecution had successfully proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt, thus finding the defendant guilty.

    Peter Nwachukwu was arraigned on June 3, 2022, by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (OAGF) on a 23-count charge, including culpable homicide punishable by death, spousal battery, cruelty to children, and criminal intimidation.

    Throughout the trial, the prosecution called 17 witnesses—including two of the late singer’s children—and tendered 25 documents as exhibits.

    Read Also: Marriage, citizenship registration: Court orders FG to halt action over alleged contract breach

    The defendant, in his defence, testified personally and called four other witnesses, presenting four exhibits.

    Before sentencing, Nwachukwu’s counsel, Reginald Nwali, pleaded for leniency, but the prosecution, led by Mrs. Aderonke Imala, urged the court to enforce the full weight of the law.

    Justice Nwosu-Iheme sentenced Peter Nwachukwu to death by hanging on Count 1 (culpable homicide).

    Additionally, he received two years’ imprisonment each for counts 2, 3, 8, 9, 12, 13, and 18; six months’ imprisonment for count 10; and three years’ imprisonment for count 11. He was also fined N500,000 and N200,000 respectively for counts 6 and 7.

  • Court halts development of Abuja multi-million naira market project

    Court halts development of Abuja multi-million naira market project

    A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) has issued an order stopping further development works on the planned multi-million Abuja market project known as the Apo Resettlement Market Scheme.

    Justice Yusuf Halilu, in a ruling, ordered the AMAC Investment and Property Development Company Limited, Commercial Properties Ltd, Manillah Integrated Partners Ltd, and their agents to halt any further works on the market project located at plot 1729 Cadastral Zone E27, Apo, Abuja.

    The interlocutory restraining injunction, Justice Halilu said, is to subsist until the determination of a suit brought against Dr. Shuaibu Omeiza Musari and his company, Techs and Concretes Nigeria Ltd, by AMAC Investment, Commercial Properties, and Manillah Integrated.

    The ruling delivered on April 15 was on the application filed by Techs and Concretes Nigeria Ltd, with which it sought to preserve the subject of the dispute between the parties in the suit, marked: CV/467/2024.

    Techs and Concretes Nigeria Ltd stated in a supporting affidavit that a dispute arose between the parties when Manillah Integrated Partners allegedly decided to breach an agreement between them to jointly develop the market.

    It stated that by the joint venture agreement executed between them, Manillah Integrated Partners was designated as the “developer” while Techs and Concretes Nigeria Ltd was designated as the “financier, co-developer and sole marketer.”

    Techs and Concretes stated that contrary to the terms of the agreement between them, Manillah Integrated Partners allegedly went behind to unilaterally commenced the development of the market project.

    It stated that the suit by Manillah Integrated Partners and others was intended to shield them from being made to comply with the agreement, to get away with their breach of the agreement.

    In the ruling of April 15, Justice Halilu said: “From what has played out, as contained in the respective affidavits for and against the application for interlocutory injunction, I am fortified to say that there is indeed an agreement which both parties have signed, is the document at the centre of the misunderstanding.

    Read Also: BREAKING: Court sentences Gospel singer Osinachi’s husband to death

    “The second defendant/applicant (Techs and Concretes Ltd) is entitled, in law, to rely on the same (the agreement) as the basis for establishing legal interest and has indeed established the same as a matter of right, which deserves legal protection.

    “I am minded to hold that the balance of convenience hinges heavily in favour of the applicant (Techs and Concretes).

    “On the whole, therefore, I have no difficulty granting the application in the overriding interest of justice and fairplay,” the judge said.

    On Monday, Dr. Musari, accompanied by some officials of his firm and security personnel, visited the site of the project to paste the court order and notify workers on the site to cease operations as ordered by the court.

    Dr. Musari said as a law-abiding citizen, he was not interested in any trouble, but that the right thing should be done, with parties complying with the order of the court and waiting for the final determination of the case.

  • Court orders final forfeiture of Lagos property linked to N89m Sterling bank fraud

    Court orders final forfeiture of Lagos property linked to N89m Sterling bank fraud

    Justice Dehinde Dipeolu of the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos has ordered the final forfeiture of a storey building located at No. 26 Tolu Road, Olodi Apapa, in the Ajeromi Ifelodun Local Government Area of Lagos State. 

    The building is suspected to have been acquired with proceeds of unlawful activities.

    The suspected illegal funds stemmed from the unauthorized transfer of N89 million belonging to Sterling Bank Plc, allegedly resulting from a system glitch.

    The forfeiture order followed a motion filed and argued by counsel to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Hanatu Kofarnaisa.

    The EFCC filed the application under Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, No. 14 of 2006, and Section 44(2)(b) of the 1999 Constitution.

    The application, dated April 8, 2025, in Suit No: FHC/L/MISC/795/2024, sought a final forfeiture of the said property to the Federal Government of Nigeria, on behalf of Sterling Bank Plc. 

    The Commission’s investigation allegedly revealed that the building was acquired or developed using proceeds of unlawful activities.

    According to the EFCC, the Court is empowered under the law to grant the reliefs sought. It maintained that the funds used to acquire the property are reasonably suspected to be proceeds of crime.

    In an affidavit in support of the motion, Gyal Maina Gapani, an EFCC operative assigned to the case, recounted the findings of the investigation.

    He stated that on July 18, 2022, the EFCC received a petition from Sterling Bank alleging criminal conversion and unauthorized transfer of funds due to a system glitch. 

    The petition claimed that a total of N295,916,201.02 was unlawfully transferred and converted by some customers of the bank for personal use.

    Read Also: Court urged to halt further release of LG allocations to Rivers State

    One suspect, Ojora Sulaimon Kehinde, was alleged to have fraudulently obtained N89 million through PayAttitude Global Ltd, an e-wallet platform of the bank. 

    The EFCC wrote to PayAttitude, which responded in a letter dated March 17, 2023, providing transaction records linked to Kehinde.

    To launder and conceal the illicit funds, Kehinde allegedly transferred a substantial amount to his wife, Aminat Olatanwa Ojora, via her Sterling Bank account (0072889319). 

    The funds were reportedly used to purchase the property now forfeited.

    Further investigations revealed that Aminat transferred N17 million to Chuksy Odozy Osazuwa (Zenith Bank account 1006927656), who then facilitated the purchase of the property. 

    Kehinde also allegedly enlisted his brother, Muritala Sulaimon Kehinde, to act as a front in executing the deed of assignment.

    Osazuwa and five of his relatives reportedly signed a memorandum of understanding confirming the transaction.

    The EFCC stated that the interim forfeiture order was granted on January 10, 2025. 

    The court also directed that the order be published in a national daily to allow interested parties to appear and show cause why the forfeiture should not be made final. 

    He added the order was published in The Punch newspaper.

    Having complied with the directive and with no opposition filed, the EFCC urged the court to grant the final forfeiture, stating it was in the interest of justice.

    Consequently, Justice Dipeolu granted the application and ordered the final forfeiture of the property.

  • Court urged to halt further release of LG allocations to Rivers State

    Court urged to halt further release of LG allocations to Rivers State

    …ex-deputy speaker faults Ibas’ appointment of caretakers

    The Federal High Court in Abuja has been urged to stop the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Accountant General of the Federation (AG-F) and the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) from further releasing allocations to Local Government in Rivers State.

    The request forms part of the reliefs being sought in a suit filed by a former Deputy Speaker of Rivers State, Marshall Stanley-Uwom through a team of lawyers led by Sylvester Evbuomwan.

    Listed as defendants in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/797/2025 are the President of Nigeria, the National Assembly, the Senate, the Senate President, the House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Administrator of Rivers State Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retired), the CBN, the AG-F and the FAAC.

    The plaintiff is contending, among others, that by virtue of the provisions Section 7 (1) of the Constitution and the Electoral Act and the Supreme Court decision in the case of AGF v. AG, Abia State and others (2024) LPELR-62576 (SC), it was illegal to continue to release allocations to Rivers LGAs which currently do no have elected Chairmen.

    He also faulted Iba’s decision to sack elected Chairmen in the state, arguing that the state of emergency declared in Rivers has lapsed because the National Assembly allegedly failed to secure the required votes to legitimise the declaration by the President.

    Stanley-Uwom stated, in a supporting affidavit, that upon taking over the affairs of the government of Rivers State, Iba’s (listed as the 7th defendant, sacked all the elected officers in charge of the affairs of the Local Government of Rivers State and appointed a new set of Local Government Caretaker Committee to run the affairs of the LGA’s in Rivers State.

    Read Also: Court okays arrest warrant for six CBEX scam suspects

    “The 7th defendant also removed from office the Chairman and members of the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) appointed and confirmed by the Rivers State House of Assembly and appoint a new Chairman and members for the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC).

    “The 8th, 9th and 10th defendants (CBN, AG-F and FAAC) have been releasing allocations accruable to the LGAs of Rivers State to the caretaker committees appointed by the 7th defendant and also releasing to the 7th defendant all allocations accrued to Rivers’ state.

    “The 7th defendant is utilizing the fund of Rivers State without parliament appropriations.”

    Stanley-Uwom wants the court to declare that by virtue of Section 305 (6) (b) of the Constitution the proclamation of state of emergency in Rivers State

    issued by the President has ceased to have effect in the absence of a resolution supported by two-thirds majority of all the members of each

    House of the National Assembly approving the Proclamation.

    He is equally praying for the following reliefs: A declaration that by virtue of Section 197 and 198 of the

    Constitution of the 7th defendant cannot legally remove from office theChairman and members of the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) appointed and confirmed by the Rivers State House of Assembly and appoint a new Chairman and members for theRivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC).

    *A order that the state of emergency in Rivers State issued and or proclaimed by the President has ceased to have effect.

    *An order compelling the 7th defendant to immediately vacate the office of sole administrator of Rivers State and allow the democratically elected Governor of Rivers State resume his office.

    *An order restraining the 8th, 9th and 10th defendants from releasing allocations accruable to the Local Government Councils of Rivers State from the Federation Account to the unelected officials appointed by the 7th defendant as caretakers.

  • Court bars ICPC from arresting FUOYE VC

    Court bars ICPC from arresting FUOYE VC

    A Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos has issued an interim order restraining the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) from arresting the Vice Chancellor of the Federal University, Oye-Ekiti (FUOYE), Prof. Abayomi Fasina.

    Justice Akintayo Aluko directed the commission, with its agents and representatives, to maintain the status quo ante bellum on its invitation of Fasina, as well as any threat of arrest, detention, or infringement on his liberty and rights, pending the hearing and final determination of his Motion on Notice for an Interlocutory Injunction.

    The judge also restrained the ICPC from taking any or further steps, pending the hearing and final determination of Fasina’s Motion on Notice.

    Justice Aluko made the orders against ICPC after taking submissions of Mr. Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa (SAN), leading O. Adesioye, on a motion ex parte filed marked FHC/L/CS/768/2025, on behalf of Fasina.

    The matter has been adjourned till April 25 for hearing of the Motion on Notice.

    Earlier, in urging the court to grant the ex parte motion, Adegboruwa (SAN) told the court that the motion is supported with an affidavit sworn to by Dr. Adedayo Sobowale, staff member of FUOYE, and some documentary exhibits. 

    Read Also: Rivers: Only police, EFCC, ICPC can probe Fubara, says Ahamba

    Justice Aluko after listening to the submission of Mr. Adegboruwa (SAN) ruled: “And the court having heard Ebun Olu Adegboruwa (SAN) with O. Adesioye (Esq) for the applicant who moved in terms praying it to grant the reliefs sought as endorsed on the motion paper.

    “And the court, having considered it deserving, granted the prayers sought. “That an interim order directing the respondent herein, whether by itself, its agents, servants or otherwise howsoever to maintain the status quo ante bellum in respect of the respondent’s invitation of the applicant and the threat of his arrest, detention and curtailing his personal liberty and fundamental rights by the respondent, the subject matter of this suit, pending the hearing and final determination of the applicants Motion on Notice for Interlocutory Injunction filed herein is hereby granted.“

  • Court bars ICPC from arresting FUOYE Vice Chancellor

    Court bars ICPC from arresting FUOYE Vice Chancellor

    A Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, has granted an interim order restraining the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) from taking any further action against the Vice Chancellor of the Federal University, Oye-Ekiti (FUOYE), Professor Abayomi Fasina.

    Presiding judge, Justice Akintayo Aluko, directed the ICPC and its agents to maintain the status quo ante bellum regarding the Commission’s invitation of Professor Fasina, including any threat of arrest, detention, or violation of his fundamental rights, pending the hearing and final determination of his Motion on Notice for an Interlocutory Injunction.

    The court further restrained the ICPC from taking any additional steps concerning the subject matter of the case until the substantive motion is fully heard and decided.

    The interim orders followed submissions by Mr. Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa (SAN), who appeared alongside O. Adesioye (Esq) on behalf of Professor Fasina. The motion Ex Parte, marked FHC/L/CS/768/2025, was supported by an affidavit deposed to by Dr. Adedayo Sobowale, a staff member of FUOYE, along with attached documentary evidence.

    The court will determine the substantive application in due course.

    Justice Aluko, after listening to the submission of Mr. Adegboruwa (SAN), ruled that: “and the court having heard Ebun Olu Adegboruwa (SAN) with 0. Adesioye (Esq) for the Applicant, who moved in terms praying it to grant the reliefs sought as endorsed on the motion paper.

    “And the court, having considered it deserving, granted the prayers sought. “That an interim order directing the respondent herein, whether by itself, its agents, servants or otherwise howsoever to maintain the status quo ante bellum in respect of the respondent’s invitation of the applicant and the threat of his arrest, detention and curtailing his personal liberty and fundamental rights by the respondent, the subject matter of this suit, pending the hearing and final determination of the applicants Motion on Notice for Interlocutory Injunction filed herein is hereby granted.

    Read Also: NBA condemns arson of Osun High Court

    “That an interim order restraining the respondent from taking any further steps in relation to the subject matter of this fundamental right action and issues canvassed therein, pending the hearing and final determination of the applicant’s Motion on Notice for Interlocutory Injunction filed herein, is hereby granted.

    “That the applicant is directed to enter into a formal undertaking.”

    The matter has been adjourned to April 25, 2025, for hearing of the Motion on Notice.

  • Court orders interim forfeiture of 73 properties linked to cybercrime, money laundering

    Court orders interim forfeiture of 73 properties linked to cybercrime, money laundering

    Justice Deinde Dipeolu of the Federal High Court in Lagos has granted the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) an order for the interim forfeiture of 73 properties suspected to be instruments of computer-related fraud and money laundering.

    The court also directed the EFCC to publish the order in a national newspaper, inviting interested parties to appear within 14 days to show cause why a final forfeiture order should not be granted in favour of the federal government.

    The order, granted on April 23, 2025, in suit number FHC/L/MISC/382/2025, followed a motion ex parte filed by the EFCC against a firm, Genting International Co., and argued by EFCC counsel B.M. Isah.

    The forfeited items include: 1,596 computers/laptops, 4,091 mobile phones, 350 foreign SIM cards, 3,399 Nigerian SIM cards (1,122 MTN, 316 9mobile, 1,277 Airtel, 684 Glo), 194 routers, 205 sofas, 501 double-step bunks, 754 mattresses, 40 refrigerators, 10 microwaves, and 2 whiteboards.

    Also listed are: 16 inverter batteries, 14 inverters, 43 CPUs/monitors, a ring light, 2 fuel tanks, a transformer, 7 vehicles, 411 deep freezers, 13 electric kettles, 21 UPS units, a toaster, an air fryer, 558 office tables, 2 TVs, a network server, 6 gas cylinders, a blender, 3 weight scales, a spiral dough mixer, 2 double-burner stoves, and a dining set.

    Justice Dipeolu ruled: “I have read the motion and attachments and find sufficient merit in the application. Consequently, the motion succeeds and is hereby granted.”

    The EFCC filed the application under Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Related Offences Act, 2006, and the court’s inherent jurisdiction.

    It sought “An interim forfeiture of the properties listed in Schedule A; and that the court has the power to grant such reliefs under Section 44(2)(B) of the Constitution and the Advance Fee Fraud Act.

    In an 18-paragraph affidavit, Kaina Garba, an EFCC investigator, said the Commission stated that he received intelligence on a syndicate involved in computer fraud, money laundering, and organised crime, allegedly led by Chinese nationals operating under the name Genting International.

    Read Also: Osun Attorney-General inspect razed buildings, lament poor security in Osun courts

    Preliminary findings revealed that the syndicate was recruiting and training Nigerian youths in romance, dating, and investment scams. Each recruit was assigned a computer system and a specially configured mobile phone line.

    A sting operation on December 10, 2024, at No. 7 Oyinjolayemi Street, Victoria Island, Lagos—believed to be the syndicate’s headquarters—led to the recovery of the listed assets. Other properties tied to the syndicate were identified at No. 14 Modupe Alakija Crescent, Ikoyi; Plot 1220 Bishop Oluwole Street, Victoria Island; and Plot No. 54A A.J. Marinho Drive, Victoria Island.

    Garba stated that 761 suspects, both foreign and Nigerian, were arrested. However, the suspected leaders and financiers remain at large but are being pursued by the Commission.

    He urged the court to grant the application, citing public interest and the need to thoroughly investigate the growing menace of cybercrime and money laundering in Nigeria.

  • NBA condemns arson of Osun High Court

    NBA condemns arson of Osun High Court

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Osogbo branch, has condemned the arson of the Osun High Court in Ilesa on Monday.

    The NBA, in a statement by its Chairman, Mr Yemi Abiona, on Tuesday in Osogbo, described the incident as a “heinous attack that poses a serious threat to justice delivery and the rule of law”.

    According to Abiona, it is worrisome  that such a dastardly attack is happening the second time, having recorded a similar incident few years ago in court 3, where the chambers of the judge was razed.

    “I wonder what the perpetrators of such an attack on the court room intended to achieve. This attack is the handiwork of faceless cowards and ignorants.

    “Though, the cause of this arson is still subject to investigation, but from indications, the inferno cannot be an act of God.

    “We only wonder what the perpetrators intend to achieve by setting fire to court rooms where documents are kept,” he said.

    Read Also: Court registers $3.5m UK judgment against businessman, wife

    The chairman commended Gov. Ademola Adeleke of Osun for his swift response of directing thorough investigations and increased security measures around the court premises in the state.

    Abiona, who urged security agencies to apprehend the perpetrators and bring them to justice, said the association was ready to provide free legal services to prosecute whoever was behind the arson.

    “We are urging the police to leave no stone unturned in conducting a thorough investigation into the incident.

    “Together, we can uphold the integrity of our justice system,” he said.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Osun High Court 2 in Ilesa was set on fire in the early hours of Monday.

    The arson led to the destruction of sensitive documents and exhibits of the court, while the entire building was burnt to the ground.

    Meanwhile, Adeleke had directed thorough investigations into the incident, and also called on security agencies to beef up security measures around all court premises in the state.

    (NAN)