Tag: Court

  • Court remands wife for allegedly stabbing husband to death

    Court remands wife for allegedly stabbing husband to death

    An Iyaganku Chief Magistrates’ Court yesterday ordered the remand of a housewife, Olajumoke Olalere, 33, at Agodi Correctional facility, Ibadan, for allegedly stabbing her husband to death.

    The Chief Magistrate, Mrs Olabisi Ogunkanmi, who did not take the defendant’s plea for lack of jurisdiction, ordered her remand pending the legal advice from the Directorate of Public Prosecution (DPP).

    She, thereafter, adjourned the case until March 5, 2025 for mention.

    Read Also: INEC accredits 111 domestic, international observers to monitor poll

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the police charged Olalere with a count of murder.

    The prosecutor,  Cpl. Akeem Akinloye, had told the court that the defendant on October 30, at 9.00 p.m. allegedly caused the death of her 39-year-old husband, Oluwasegun Tinubu.

    Akinloye said the  defendant allegedly stabbed her husband  with a knife during a disagreement at their house, at Zone 5, Gbelu,  Iyana – Agbala, Ibadan.

  • Auxiliary: Court adjourns to allow prosecutor present witnesses

    Auxiliary: Court adjourns to allow prosecutor present witnesses

    Justice O. A. Adetujoye of Fiat Court 5, Oyo State High Court, Ring Road, Ibadan has granted application for adjournment by the Oyo State Government to December 16, in a case involving a former chairman of the proscribed National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW) in the state, Alhaji Mukaila Lamidi, also called Auxiliary.

    The granting was in response to an application by the prosecutor (Director of Public Prosecution), Mr. S. O. Adeoye, for a maximum of two weeks to gather and present witnesses in court.

    Auxiliary, a former chairman, Disciplinary Committee of the Park Management System (PMS), is facing trial in a case with suit number HER/1C/2024 on offences allegedly committed on January 31, 2023 at Isale-Oja, via Igangan, in Ayete Magisterial District.

    The matter, which is: the State Versus Mukaila Lamidi (Auxiliary), borders on a five-count charge of conspiracy, murder and attempted murder.

    The matter was slated for hearing yesterday.

    The case is the second matter involving Auxiliary (Defendant) at the same court in the last four days.

    The state prosecution team is led by the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), Mr. S. O. Adeoye and supported by G. A. Ramoni (Senior State Counsel) and O. A. Shobande (State Counsel).

    The defendant was brought to court amid tight security. The case, however, could not proceed due to the inability of the prosecutor to present witnesses in court.

    During proceedings yesterday, defence counsel, Mr Olalekan Ojo, Senior Advocate of Nigeria, who was accompanied by Mrs E. O. Mbam, reminded the court that the case had been slated for hearing since three weeks ago and that any prosecution who was active would have done much better than what they claimed to have done.

    Read Also: First Lady: RHI is funded by private donors, corporate partners

    He said he was not pleased because it was presumed that the accused person (Auxiliary) was innocent.

    Unfortunately, according to him, the accused had been languishing in prison custody.

    Ojo urged the court to be minded to indulge the prosecutor with the application, being the first adjournment so requested.

    The Senior Advocate, however, appealed to the court to give expeditious hearing to the case.

    Responding, the state prosecutor, who doubles as the DPP, Mr Adeoye, argued that it would be out of place to say the state was not diligent in the prosecution of the case, saying it would be the first time the state would be asking for an adjournment since the beginning of the case.

    He told the court the efforts he made by writing and following up with the police to bring the witnesses, noting that even the Executive Assistant to Governor Seyi Makinde on Security, CP Sunday Odukoya (rtd), did so much in writing the police and relevant authorities to ensure the witnesses were in court.

    The Nation reports that CP Sunday Odukoya (rtd) was also in court to witness the proceeding.

    Before ruling, the court asked the prosecution how soon they would be able to gather witnesses, to which he (Adeoye) responded that it wouldn’t take more than two weeks.

  • Ali Bello vs FRN: Court orders EFCC to confirm alleged fictitious report on website as defence lawyers kick

    Ali Bello vs FRN: Court orders EFCC to confirm alleged fictitious report on website as defence lawyers kick

    A Federal High Court in Abuja, on Wednesday ordered the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission  (EFCC)’s lawyer, Abbas Mohammed, to confirm and report back to the court if an alleged misleading report on the court’s proceedings was from the Commission’s website.

    Justice Obiora Egwuatu gave the order after the defence lawyers in the money laundering trial of Ali Bello and his co-defendants accused the EFCC of publishing untrue accounts of what transpired in court on Tuesday on its website against their clients.

    Abubakar Aliyu, SAN, and Nureini Jimoh, SAN, who appeared for the defendants in the alleged N3 billion fraud, had informed Justice Egwuatu about the development shortly after the matter was called.

    They complained that a report on the proceedings of Tuesday posted on the website of the EFCC and on social media contradicted what transpired in court and that this was not the first time such would happen.

    According to the lawyers, the witness (PW-3), who was cross-examined, said that he never said that the money used in the payment of the school fees of the children of the former governor, Alhaji Yahaya Bello, came from Kogi State Government but what the EFCC is saying in the media is different.

    Upon resumed hearing on Wednesday, Jimoh, who appeared for 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants, had informed the court that though the matter was slated for continuation of hearing, however, he had a preliminary application to make.

    He said his application hinged on the publication by the prosecution. 

    The senior lawyer alleged that there had been incessant and unfair publications by the EFCC against the defendants, which might negatively affect public confidence in the administration of justice.

    “We have kept quiet severally when these publications were coming from the EFCC so as to allow the trial to proceed,” he said.

    Jimoh said the “misleading publications” were meant to incite the public against the decision of the court in the trial.

    “After proceedings yesterday (Tuesday), in the evening, we saw a disturbing publication on the EFCC website, saying that PW-3 (the 3rd prosecution witness) affirmed before Justice Obiora Agwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja that funds were brought to him (witness) by the agents of the state government to pay the school fees of Alhaji Yahaya Bello’s children,” he said. 

    The lawyer said that such publications, which were contrary to what actually transpired in court, could grossly affect the proceedings of the court and public confidence in the justice system.

    “I want to draw the attention of your lordship to Rule 39 of the Rules of Professional Conduct that forbids such advertisment or publication.

    “My application therefore is that if this honourable court finds that this publication is contrary to proceedings in court yesterday, that the court directs that the publication should be brought down immediately on the website and that the EFCC should publish a rejoinder immediately.

    “My number three application is that the EFCC should stop forthwith from making such publications,” he prayed. 

    Jimoh also urged the court to suspend proceedings pending when the EFCC complied with the directives.

    He said this was to ensure the sanctity of the administration of justice in obedience to the statutory laws. 

    He then gave a copy of the printout of the publication from the commission’s website to the EFCC’s lawyer, Mohammed.

    Corroborating Jimoh’s submission, Aliyu, who represented Bello (1st defendant) in court, drew the attention of the court to a ruling of the Supreme Court in Atiku Abubakar Vs. INEC and others.

    The lawyer said that the apex court cautioned lawyers against engaging in social media reports to divert the attention of the public from what really transpired in court. 

    According to him, the court says counsel must review their conduct and desist from engaging on social media.

    “We are having a situation where what the witness said is contrary in the social media.

    “This is not the first time this is happening. We made same complaint before Honourable Justice Omotosho. 

    “The witness (PW-3) said he never said the money came from Kogi State Government but what they are saying in the media is different,” Aliyu added. 

    Responding, EFCC’s lawyer said though he had seen the printed publication, he could not verify its source for now.

    “Confirm for clarity sake whether it is from your website,” the judge said.  

    “I will need to confirm from the media team my lord. 

    “We are minister in the temple of justice that is why I said I would need to confirm from the media team my lord,” he said.

    Justice Egwuatu, in a short ruling, ordered the prosecution lawyer to confirm the publication in his office and report back on the next adjourned date.

    The trial continued with Aliyu’s cross-examination of PW-3, Jamilu Abdullahi, a Bureau de Change operator.

    Read Also: Court adjourns as trial of Yoruba nation agitators begins

    When Aliyu asked the witness if Mohammed Idris was the person that brought the 300,000 dollars to him, the witness said he could not remember who brought the money.

    Again, when the lawyer asked the PW-3 if he would be surprised that the N2.1 billion paid into the 2nd defendant’s account on December 14, 2021, from which the school fees was paid, was a loan from Access Bank, the witness said he did not know the source of the money.

    The Judge thereafter adjourned the matter to November 28 for continuation of hearing. 

    It will be recalled that on Tuesday, the PW-3 was cross-examined by Aliyu in the ongoing trial.

    The EFCC had filed an alleged money laundering charge against Bello, Abba Adaudu, Yakubu Siyaka Adabenege and Iyadi Sadat as 1st to 4th defendants, respectively.

    Although they were arraigned before Justice Egwuatu, they all pleaded not guilty to the charge.

  • Court adjourns as trial of Yoruba nation agitators begins

    Court adjourns as trial of Yoruba nation agitators begins

    The trial of 27 members of the Oodua Republic under the aegis of Yoruba Nation Agitators began on Wednesday as the suspects again appeared in court.

    The court adjourned the matter till November 13. 2024 for further hearing of the case.

    The Nation reports the suspects are facing trial for invading the Oyo State government Secretariat on April 13, 2024 allegedly to declare the sovereign Republic of Yoruba Nation (Oodua Republic)

    The case with suit number I/51c/2024 at the Fiat Court 3, Oyo State High Court, Ring Road, Ibadan was presided over by Justice K. B Olawoyin.

    The defendants (1- 27) facing trial include: Adeyemo Peter, Adeyemo Joseph, Amos Oluwaseyi Ogundeji, Ayanwale Rofiat, Olalere Mathew and Ismaila Malomo Peter.

    Others are: Fatoki Anthony, Murittala Abefe, Ismaila Adepoju, Fatunmbi Wasiu, Isaac Friday, Ayanwale Saburi, Adeola Elegbede, Ademola Adeniyi, Ogundeji Alabi, Ojo Olufemi, Ajani Ezekiel, Adejumo Lateef and Ayoola David.

    The list also includes: Adesokan Hameed, Adesokan Hameed, Abiona Esther, Omoyajowo Funsho, Tola Olufemi, Oritola Alabi, Kayode Fakeye and Taiwo Titilayo.

    Read Also: Yoruba nation agitator dies in custody as 27 others appear in court

    The suspects were arraigned on a five-count charge bordering on conspiracy, unlawful possession of firearms, unlawful assembly, treasonable felony and treason.

    The case is being prosecuted by the State Government team led by the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), Mr S. O Adeoye, O. R. Yussuf (Deputy DPP), O. S Tella (DDPP) and three Senior State Counsels, including: S. A Osuolale, Isa Busari and O. A Bolarinwa.

    According to the charge sheet, the offence was committed on 13th day of April, 2024, at Ibadan, in the Ibadan Judicial Division, an offence contrary to and punishable under section 37(2) of the Criminal Code, Cap 38, Vo. II, Laws of Oyo State, 2000.

    The Nation further reports one of the suspects, Adejumo Lateef, the 18th defendant, died in custody. 

    On Wednesday, all the suspects were brought to court and their pleas were taken.

    The courtroom was filled to a full capacity as the court as many friends, family members and associates of the defendants were in attendance..

    The Executive Assistant on Security to Governor Seyi Makinde, CP Sunday Odukoya was sighted in court.

    There was also tight Security within the court premises.

  • Court restrain CBN, others from withholding Kano LG funds

    Court restrain CBN, others from withholding Kano LG funds

    A Kano State High Court has restrained the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Accountant-General of Federal (AGF), the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) from withholding the 44 Kano State Local Governments’ allocations.

    The court gave the order following a Motion Ex-Parte filed on Nov.1, by the Chairman of the National Union of Local Government Employees, NULGE, Ibrahim Muhammed and five other concerned residents of the State.

    The others are  Ibrahim Shehu, Ibrahim Abubakar, Usman Isa, Sarki Kurawa and Malam Usman Imam.

    The motion exparte was filed through the applicants’ counsel, Mr Bashir Yusuf-Muhammad and Usman Bala-Salisu, highlighted concerns over the possible withholding or delay of allocations essential for local governance in the State.

    Read Also: Court stops CBN, AG-F from releasing allocation to Rivers

    The respondents are the Accountant-General of the Federation, as 45th defendant, Central Bank of Nigeria, as 46th defendant, Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission, 47th defendant, the 44 Kano Local Government’s, UBA, Access and six other commercial banks.

    Justice Ibrahim Musa-Muhammad granted an Order Of Interim injunction restraining the 45th to 54th respondents either by themselves, their agents, officers, privies, representatives, or interfering with the applicants’ rights generally in relation to this suit.

    “By withholding, refusing to disburse or delaying to disburse, deferring or suspending the monthly allocation or in any way tampering with the allocation from the Federation Account to the 44 LGAs pending the hearing and determination of the Motion on Notice”

    The Judge also restrained the 45th to 54th Respondents from taking further steps with a view to tampering with, withholding from disbursement on schedule, refusing to disburse the allocations from the Federation Accounts due and payable to the Kano 44 LGAs for the benefit of the citizens pending the hearing and determination of the Motion on Notice”

    Musa-Muhammad granted the applicants permission to serve the court processes on the 45th, 46th and 47th respondents through Red Star Express Plc, Currier Service as a special bailiff to ensure the effective service of the court documents.

    The Court adjourned the matter until Nov.21, for hearing of the motion on notice.

    (NAN)

  • Alleged N27bn fraud: Court to hear ex-Taraba gov’s motion challenging jurisdiction

    Alleged N27bn fraud: Court to hear ex-Taraba gov’s motion challenging jurisdiction

    An Abuja High Court on  Tuesday adjourned until Nov. 11, hearing in a motion filed by a former governor of Taraba, Darius Ishaku, challenging jurisdiction to hear the alleged N27 billion fraud preferred against him.

    Ishaku and a former  Permanent Secretary of Bureau for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Bello Yero were arraigned on a -15- count charge by the Economic and financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Justice Sylvanus Oriji adjourned the matter after both counsel to the defendants told the court that they had filed preliminary objections before the court.

    Justice Oriji adjourned until Nov. 13 for hearing of the two motions.

    At the resumed hearing of the matter , Rotimi Jacobs, SAN, the prosecution counsel told the court that the matter was slated for trial.

    He however told the court that he was served with preliminary objections by both counsel for the defendants.

    “The defence counsel knew very well that the case was slated for today as agreed by all the parties on Oct. 3.

    ”They filed these motions on the day of the trial thereby scuttling the matter.

    Read Also: EFCC confirms arrest, detention of ex-gov Okowa over alleged N1.3trn fraud

    ”I seek the court’s direction. If  I am allowed, I will address the court in 30 minutes but if it is adjournment, I will abide by the court ‘s direction ” he told the court.

    Responding , P.H Ogbole, the first defence counsel told the court that he served the motion on the prosecution only Monday.

    ” We were aware of today’s date but in the cause of our research, we filed the motion which borders on jurisdiction.

    ”I am not sure that the matter will likely go on today because we will also want him to reply” he told the court.

    Similarly, Adeola Adedipe , SAN, the second defence counsel told the court that his motion was served on Nov. 1.

    ”There is no intention to scuttle the trial.

    ”The prosecution can not reply orally like that except in some special circumstances which this is not one” he said.

    “On the face of the motion marked M/ 14609/24, the 2nd defendant contended that this Honourable court lacks jurisdiction to entertain this charge, for incompetence and lack of substantive, procedural and territorial jurisdiction,” he said.

    In the copy of the charge sheet dated Sept. 27, marked CR/792/24, the EFCC accused the defendants of diverting the sum of N1,010,000,000 to their personal use between Aug. 25, 2015, and March 21, 2016, in Abuja.

    The agency said the amount formed part of the 2.5 per cent contingency funds belonging to the Bureau of Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs.

    The EFCC noted that the duo committed an offence contrary to Section 315 of the Penal Code A, Cap 532, Laws of the Federal Capital Territory of Nigeria 2007 and punishable under the same section.

    Ishaku and Yero were also accused of diverting an aggregate sum of N1, 1 billion which formed part of the 2.5 per cent contingency fund belonging to the Bureau of Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs between July 2015 and May 2019.

    Also, between Sept. 3, 2015, and Jan. 29, 2018, in Abuja, the defendants were accused of diverting the sum of N761 million to defray the loan of N1bn granted by Zenith Bank Plc. to your company, Worthy Construction Limited.

    They however, pleaded not guilty to the allegations levelled against them.

    They were admitted to bail on Oct. 3, in the sum of N150 million each with two sureties in like amount, one of whom must be a federal government employee and must be a Director.

    The judge ordered  that the two sureties must be resident in the FCT with their house addresses to be verified by the Registrar of the Court.

    The court also barred from travelling out of the country except with the permission of the judge.

    (NAN)

  • BREAKING Court stops treason trial of 114 #EndBadGovernance protesters

    BREAKING Court stops treason trial of 114 #EndBadGovernance protesters

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has stopped further proceedings in the treason charges brought against about 114 #Endbadgovernance protesters, including some minors, by the Nigeria Police Force (NPF).  

    Justice Obiora Egwuatu struck out the charges, marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/503/2024 and FHC/ABJ/CR/527/2024  on Tuesday after the prosecution applied to withdraw them.

    The prosecution was represented at Tuesday’s proceedings by the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation (DPPF), Mohammed Abubakar.

    Abubakar told the court that he was exercising the powers granted the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) by the Constitution, under Section 174 to take over the case from the police.

    When allowed by the court to assume further prosecution of the case, the DPPF then applied to discontinue the case, an application defence lawyers did not oppose.

    Ruling, Justice Egwuatu granted the request and struck out the charges. 

    The defendants were not in court, but  the judge ordered their immediate release from custody.

    Details shortly…

  • Suspects arraigned in Court over bad governance protests not in our custody -Correctional Service

    Suspects arraigned in Court over bad governance protests not in our custody -Correctional Service

    The Nigerian Correctional Service has dismissed the report that suspects arraigned in Court over the bad governance protests were kept in its facilities. 

    The NCoS said there was no iota of truth in the reports as the suspects were rejected when the Service was approached for such. 

    A statement by Public Relations Officer of the Service, Assistant Controller of Corrections, Umar Abubakar said the NCoS Act 2019 does not permit juvenile to be kept in facilities meant for adults. 

    “There are misleading reports making the rounds in some sections of the media purporting that the suspects who were arraigned before Justice Obiora Egwuatu at the Federal High Court, Abuja Division, for treason, during the End Bad Governance protest that held in August 2024, were remanded in one of the adult custodial centres in Abuja.

    “The said report has no iota of truth as the Service operates based on best correctional and global practices,” Abubakar said. 

     He added: “To set records straight, the Nigerian Correctional Service Act 2019 has empowered the Controllers of Corrections as well as Superintendents-in-charge of Custodial Centres not to admit juveniles in facilities meant for adults. 

    “The Act also mandates the Service to reject more intake of inmates where it is apparent that the custodial facility in question is filled to capacity.

    “The Service wishes to inform the public that the said suspects were rejected and none of the suspects was remanded in adult custodial facilities as insinuated by the said report.

    “The Service assures the public that the Nigerian Correctional Service would continue to emphasize professionalism as well as respect for human rights in line with the United Nations Minimum Standard Rules for the Treatment of Juvenile offenders. 

    “Furthermore, the general public is enjoined to discountenance the said report as it is not the true position of things. “

  • UPDATED: Four teens collapse in court before arraignment over alleged treason

    UPDATED: Four teens collapse in court before arraignment over alleged treason

    About five out of the no fewer than 118 defendants brought before a Federal High Court in Abuja for arraignment collapsed on Friday few minutes after the commencement of proceedings.

    The defendants, who are a mixture of teens and adults, were brought before Justice Obiora Egwuatu for arraignment on treason charge filed against them by the Nigeria Police Force (NPF).

    They were alleged to have participated in the last #EndBadGovernance protest in Kano State, during which they allegedly chanted anti-government slogans, called for unlawful change of government through military intervention and carried foreign flags.

    According to one of the defence lawyers, Marshall Abubakar, the defendants were charged in two batches of 76 and 43.

    Shortly after the first batch was called, the defendants were mounting the dock when some  of them suddenly fell down, causing confusion in court, a development that prompted the judge to suspend proceedings.

    Health officials from the court’s clinic have been invited to attended to those who collapsed.

    Abubakar blamed the development on hunger and ill-health on the part of the defendants.

    He said: “All these young children are sick and hungry. They have been kept in police custody for weeks without food and proper medical care. They are sick and need proper attention. That is the cause of these unfortunate developments.”

    After the defendants were attended to and they regained strength, proceedings resumed, following which the prosecuting lawyer, Audi Garba applied that the names of the four that suffered ill-health, should be excluded from the charge.

    Defence lawyers, including Abubakar, did not object, following which Justice Egwuatu struck out their names from the first charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/503/2024, containing names of 76 defendants.

    The remaining 72 defendants pleased not guilty when the 10 counts in the charge was read to them.

    Abubakar moved the defendants’ bail application, against which the prosecution did not file a counter affidavit.

    Ruling, Justice Egwuatu noted that the prosecution did not counter the defendants’ assurances that they would be available for trial and would not tamper with witnesses nor jump bail if granted.

    The judge also noted that some of the defendant were young children below the age of 18 years.

    He then granted bail to each of the defendants at N10million with two sureties, one of which must be a federal civil servant from level 15, while the second should be either of each defendants’ parents or a sibling.

    He then adjourned till January 24, 2025 for the commencement of trial.

    Read Also: Court remands four farmers for allegedly desecrating place of worship

    On the second charge, marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/527/2024, 42 defendants, out of the 43 listed on the charge were eventually arraigned on Friday. 

    They were accused of committing similar offences in Kaduna during the protest.

    Before their arraignment, the prosecuting lawyer applied that one of the 43 defendants suffered ill-health and should be excluded from the proceedings, following which the judge struck out the name from the charge.

    The remaining 42 pleaded not guilty to the charge and we’re also granted bail on similar conditions as the earlier ones.

    In some of the counts in the charge: they defendants were alleged to have, “while acting in concert with drew Martin Wynne (aka Andrew Povich) a British Citizen, with intent to destabilize Nigeria, levied war against the state in order to intimidate or overawe the President by attacking and injuring police officers and burning police stations, High Court complex, NCC Complex, Kano Printing Press, Government House Kano, Kaduna Investment and Promotions Agency office, NURTW office and several other buildings thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 410 of the Penal Code (Northern States)  Federal Provisions Act CAP P3 LFN 2004

    *While acting in cert with Andrew Martin Wynne (aka Andrew Povich) a British citizen with intent destabilize Nigeria, incited to mutiny by calling on the military to take over government  from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu by chanting ‘Tinubu most go’ ‘soja muskeso’ (meaning Tinubu must go), ‘it is military we want’, while rioting and disturbing public  peace and thereby committed an offence contrary to section 413 of the Penal Code (Northern States) Federal Provisions Act CAP P3 LFN 2004. 

    *Between 1st August, 2024 to 10th August 2024 in FCT, Jos, Kano, Kaduna, Gombe, Katsina and many other states, while acting in concert with Andrew Martin Wynne (aka Andrew Povich) a British citizen, with intent to destabilize Nigeria, incited disaffection to the government by inciting public disturbance while carrying placards the inscription ‘end bad government’ and several other inscriptions to incite disaffection to the government and thereby committed an offence contrary to ion 416 of the Penal Code (Northern States) Federal Provisions Act CAP P3 LFN 

    *With intent to breakdown law and order in the above states, inciting the Nigeria Military, the Russian government, and other western countries to topple the democratically elected President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, His Excellency President Bola. Ahmad Tinubu government and other state governors using Russian flags and other flags of other countries in violent protest against law and onder, that Nigeria is not safe, and calling for the suspension of democracy in the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

  • Court remands four farmers for allegedly desecrating place of worship

    Court remands four farmers for allegedly desecrating place of worship

    A Makurdi Chief Magistrates’ Court on Friday ordered that four farmers be remanded at the Correctional Centre, Makurdi for allegedly desecrating a place of worship.

    The police charged  Tever Ikyer, Tseyina Imbur, Tsavbee Akombu and Orshi Atule with criminal conspiracy, trespass, defilement of place of worship, act of terrorism and threat to hostage taking.

    However, the Chief Magistrate, Mr Kelvin Mbanongun did not take their pleas for want of jurisdiction.

    Mbanongun adjourned the matter until Dec 19, for further mention.

    Earlier, the prosecutor, Insp Godwin Ato told the court that a letter of complaint jointly written by Elders of N.K.S.T Church, Andyar Ishan Diocese in Guma headed by Rev. Samuel Gbinde was received at the office of the Commissioner of Police, Benue Command on Oct 23.

    Prosecutor said the letter stated that sometimes in September , the pastor and elders of the Church were holding an annual congress on the church premises when six persons armed themselves with dangerous weapons such guns, cutlass, sticks and stones and invaded the premises.

    The invaders who were identified as Orshi Atule, Tseyina Imbur, Ndernen Aondowase, Tertsea Ikyerkyaa, Terver Ikyer and Tsavbee Akombo were said to have been shooting sporadically in the air and dispersed the congregation and also stole the offering realized on that day.

    Read Also: JUST IN: Court orders final forfeiture of $2.04m, properties linked to Emefiele

    The petitioners stated further that on Oct. 16 and Oct. 26, the same gang invaded the church when prayers/service was ongoing by the men fellowship with a bunch of criminal charms in a clay pot and human feces in  bags which they smeared on the alter and the church hall.

    The letter further stated that the invaders smashed the clay pot of charms on the church alter and threatened to kidnap the pastor and worshipers if they ever step their feet in the church again.

    Prosecutor said the suspects were arrested after Police investigation and they voluntarily confessed committing the crimes while others were at large.

    Prosecutor said the offence contravened the provisions of Sections 97, 349, 212 of the Penal Code Law of Benue, 2004 and 4(2) and 7 of the Abduction, Hostage-Taking, Kidnapping, Secret Cult and Similar Activities (Prohibition) Law of Benue, 2017.

    (NAN)