Tag: Court

  • Court to arraign Lagos monarch, six others over alleged N29.3 million fraud

    Court to arraign Lagos monarch, six others over alleged N29.3 million fraud

    A Federal High Court sitting at Ikoyi, Lagos has fixed June 24, for the arraignment of a Lagos monarch, the Olu of Agboyi kingdom, Monsuru Oladega, and six others over an alleged fraud of N29.3 million.

    The other convicts to be arraigned alongside the monarch are Abdulfatai Akinwale Bankole; Abubakar Seriki ‘M’, Razak Alayaki Seriki; Mrs Jemilatu Busari; Amoda Ibrahim and Adams Adebiyi, who were listed as first, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh defendants in a four count-charge marked FHC/L/80c/2024, filed against them by the Police Special Fraud Unit (PSFU), Ikoyi, Lagos.

    When the matter was called, before Justice Akintayo Aluko, the Prosecutor, Elliot Ejie, announced his appearance for the complainant, the Inspector-General of Police, while Abayomi Fagbayi, announced his appearance for all the defendants.

    The defence counsel, Fagbayi thereafter, informed the court that the first defendant, Abdulfatai Bankole, who is the only one that could receive the charge, told him that the second defendant, Monsuru Oladega, is currently abroad for medical treatment, and the rest of the defendants are not residing within the community.

    He said: “The charge was served on by order of this court. I took further steps to contact all the defendants, particularly, the first defendant (Abdulfatai Akinwale Bankole), who is the only one that could receive the charge, and he told me that the second defendant (Monsuru Abimbola Oladega), is now abroad for medical trip, and the rest are not residing within the community.

    “Even though they told me that they will come together and discuss the charge, I’ll bring them to court on the next adjourned date.”

    Prosecuting counsel, Ejie said he is not opposing the adjournment request made by the defence.

    Consequently, Justice Aluko adjourned the matter to June 24, for the arraignment of all the defendants.

    The defendants in the charges against them were alleged to have between 2014 and 2022, conspired among themselves and fraudulently obtained the sum of N29.3 million, a 1998 model Infinity QS4 Jeep; One 1998 model Nissan Pathfinder Jeep; and one Toyota Camry car, from one Joseph Kolawole Fagbamila; Olaniyi Kolawole Owoyomi, and the Amicable Friends Estate, under the pretence of allocating 15 acres and 4 plots of Odoyi’s family land, situate at Oko-Agbon, Agboyi 1, Lagos State, to them.

    Read Also: Court to arraign Lagos monarch, six others over alleged N29.3 million fraud

    The counts one and four of the charges against all the defendants read: “That you Abdulfatai Akinwale Bankole ‘M’, Monsuru Abimbola Oladega ‘M’, Abubakar Seriki ‘M’, Razak Alayaki Seriki ‘M’, Jemilatu Busari ‘F’, Amoda Ibrahim ‘M’, Adams Adebiyi ‘M’, and others at large, sometimes in 2014 did conspired amongst yourselves to commit felony to wit: obtaining a total sum of twenty-nine million and three hundred thousand naira (N29, 300, 000.00); one 1998 model Infinity QS4 Jeep; One 1998 model Nissan Pathfinder Jeep; and one Toyota Camry car, from one Joseph Kolawole Fagbamila, one Olaniyi Kolawole Owoyomi, and the Amicable Friends Estate, thereby committed an offence contrary to section 8(a), Advance Fee Fraud and other related Offences, 2606 and punishable under section 1(3) of the same Act.

    “That you Abdulfatai Akinwale Bankole ‘M’, Monsuru Abimbola Oladega ‘M’, Abubakar Seriki ‘M’, Razak Alayaki Seriki ‘M’, Jemilatu Busari ‘F’, Amoda Ibrahim ‘M’, Adams Adebiyi ‘M’, and others at large, between 2014 and 2022, at Lagos, within the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court, with intent to defraud, did retain a total sum of twenty-nine million and three hundred thousand naira (N29, 300, 000.00); One 1998 model Infinity QS4 Jeep; One 1998 model Nissan Pathfinder Jeep; and one Toyota Camry car, which formed proceeds of an unlawful act of obtaining by false pretence from one Joseph Kolawole Fagbamila, One Olaniyi Kolawole Owoyomi, and The Amicable Friends Estate, thereby committed an offence contrary to section 18 (2){d), Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022 and punishable under section 18(3) of the same Act.”

    Prior to today’s proceedings and due to the inability of the police to reach the defendants for the service of the charge, Justice Aluko had on March 18, 2024, ordered that the charge be served on their lawyer, Abayomi Fagbayi.

    The judge made the order while granting a motion Exparte dated and filed on March 4, and moved by the prosecutor, Barrister Elliott Ijie.

    In granting the motion Exparte, Justice Aluko held that: “And upon reading the affidavit in support of the motion paper sworn to by CSP Sunday Akeregun, Male, Christian a citizen of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and a Police Officer attached to Police Special Fraud Unit 13, Milverton Road, Ikoyi, Lagos State.

    “And the court having heard Eliot Omonyimenle Ijie, Esq., for the Complainant who moved in terms praying it to grant the reliefs sought as endorsed on the motion paper.

    “And the court having considered it deserving granted the prayers sought; that leave is granted to the Applicant to serve Charge number; FHC/L/80c/2024 dated February 2024 on the Defendants by substituted means through their legal practitioner, one Abayomi Fagbayi, Esq., of Abayomi Fagbayi Law Place, No. 2 Aina Ala Close, 2nd Gate, GRA Otta, Ogun State, 080232928884,08069280868.  fagbayiesq@gmail.com C/O Sola Oyewo, No. 3 Seriki Aro Avenue. Ikeja, Lagos State.

    “That an Order directing legal practitioner, Abayomi Fagbayi Esq, of Abayomi Fagbayi Law Place, No. 2 Aina Ala Close, 254 Gate, GRA Otta, Ogun State. 080232928884, 06069280868. fagbayiesq@gmail.com C/O Sola Oyewo, No. 3, Seriki Aro Avenue, Ikeja Lagos State, to report notice of compliance to this Honourable Court at the next adjourned date is hereby granted.

    “That this case is adjourned to the 7th day of May 2024 for Arraignment.”

  • I got N880,000 not N1m after my kidney was removed, 16-year-old boy tells court

    I got N880,000 not N1m after my kidney was removed, 16-year-old boy tells court

    A 16-year-old boy, yesterday, told an FCT High Court in Zuba that he was given N880,000 and not N1million, by Mr Emmanuel Olorunlaye in Alliance Hospital, Abuja, after his kidney was removed.

    The teenager made this known while being led in evidence by the prosecuting counsel, Hassan Tahir.

    The National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP) charged the defendants alongside the hospital with 11 counts bordering on organ harvesting.

    The defendants are the Medical Director, Alliance Hospital, Dr Christopher Otabor, Emmanuel Olorunlaye, Chikaodili Ugochukwu, the Administrative Secretary of the hospital and Dr Aremu Abayomi.

    The boy said he met Olorunlaye through a friend. He said Olorunlaye called his friend when the hospital needed a kidney and that the hospital usually preferred persons with O+ blood group.

    Read Also: Face of All Nigerian Festival holds August

    “My friend introduced me to Olorunlaye and told him I wanted to sell my kidney. Then Olorunlaye asked my friend to take me to any hospital around our area to see if I was healthy to donate my kidney.

    “After going to a hospital for my check up, I was given my result and my friend took a picture of it and sent it to Olorunlaye via WhatsApp  because I did not have a phone.

    ”After two days, Olorunlaye called my friend and sent some transport money to us to meet at the Alliance Hospital to run some tests.

    “I was taken to the laboratory for my blood samples and urine when I was done, Olorunlaye gave me N2,000 for a cab back home.

    “He called me back to repeat the same test in the hospital and again sent me N2,000 for a cab.

    “I went on to see him on a Tuesday and Olorunlaye informed me that the surgery would be performed on a Friday.

    “He told me not to inform any of my family members and instructed me not to eat from 8p.m to 10a.m and I did as he said,’’ he added..

    He alleged that Ugochukwu gave him some documents at 8pm and instructed him to sign them but he did not read it.

    He said Abayomi (the fourth defendant) came into the room he was kept in and told him that he would perform a medical surgery on him.

    ”He told me not to worry that he would save my life.

    “A nurse came later to get me and asked me to change into hospital wear and wheeled me into the theatre and gave me an injection that made me sleep.

    “Two days later, I heard the nurse screaming my name so I answered and as I tried to get up I felt the sharp pain on my side.

    “Olorunlaye came into my room and informed me that my kidney had been removed and asked if I needed cash or mobile transfer of money,” he said.

    He told the court that Olorunlaye told him that his friend, who “found” him, asked for his share of the N1 million and that he gave N100,000 from the money.

  • Court admits Kogi govt’s account statements in trial of Ododo’s Chief of Staff

    Court admits Kogi govt’s account statements in trial of Ododo’s Chief of Staff

    A Federal High Court in Abuja yesterday admitted the account statements detailing transactions in the Kogi State government House’s accounts with a commercial bank.

    The statements, which covered 2018 to 2021, were admitted with other documents, including the opening mandate for the account.

    The documents were admitted at the resumed hearing in the money laundering case involving the Chief of Staff to Kogi State Governor Usman Ododo, Mr. Ali Bello.

    Bello is being tried alongside Dauda Suleiman on a 10-count amended charge filed against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The documents were tendered by prosecuting lawyer Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN) through the sixth prosecution witness, Olom Otane Egoro, an official of the bank.

    Read Also; Aircraft technical fault forces Shettima to aborts US trip

    Led in evidence by Oyedepo, Egoro gave details of transactions in the accounts, as reflected in the statements of account.

    The witness identified the various deposits into and withdrawals from the accounts transfers and cash.

    He said the withdrawals were not more than N10 million at any instance.

    But the witness did not state who deposited the cash, what the money was deposited for or who withdrew it and for what purposes.

    At the conclusion of his testimony, lawyer to Bello, Abubakar Aliyu (SAN), sought an adjournment.

    Aliyu urged the court to vacate the May 7 date earlier scheduled for continuation of trial to a later date, citing health grounds.

    Oyedepo and lawyer to Suleiman, Olusegun Jolaawo (SAN), did not object.

    Justice James Omotosho adjourned the matter till June 19.

  • Alleged $9.6b P&ID scam: Court  adjourns suit against fleeing Briton, firms

    Alleged $9.6b P&ID scam: Court  adjourns suit against fleeing Briton, firms

    A Federal High Court in Abuja yesterday adjourned two separate money laundering suits filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against a British national, James Nolan, and two other companies for judgment.

    Justice Donatus Okorowo adjourned the suits for judgment after counsel to the EFCC, Bala Sanga, and the defence lawyer, Michael Ajara, adopted their final written addresses and made their submissions in the matters.

    Ajara prayed the court to dismiss the two suits for lack of jurisdiction, insisting that the court lacked jurisdiction because the charges were defective.

    Read Also: Tinubu can govern the country from anywhere – Bwala

    The lawyer said all the evidence by the anti-graft agency through its witnesses were hearsay.

    But Sanga disagreed with Ajara, arguing that under Section 220 of Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015, the irregularity of a charge does not affect the jurisdiction of the court and neither does it affect the validity of the charge.

    The lawyer averred that Ajara’s objection was belated as this should have been raised during arraignment.

    Sanga also argued that the matter could not be caught up by hearsay rules because the documents obtained by the prosecution’s investigating officers were visible in evidence.

    The lawyer submitted that the knowledge derived from day-to-day work cannot be described as hearsay.

    He prayed the court to convict the defendants and order the forfeiture of the companies’ assets to the Federal Government.

    After listening to the arguments, which lasted till evening, Justice Okorowo adjourned the matters for judgment.

    The judge said the judgment date would be communicated to parties in the suits.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the court had, on April 14, fixed yesterday for adoption of the final addresses after Nolan, who jumped bail and fled Nigeria in the alleged $9.6 billion Process and Industrial Development (P&ID) Limited scandal, opened his defence in absentia without calling any witness.

    Ajara had told the judge that he did not intend to call any witness upon resumed hearing.

    The lawyer said after his evaluation of the EFCC’s evidence, he would rely on the case of the prosecution.

    Sanga did not object, and the matter was fixed for adoption of written addresses.

    NAN also reports that the EFCC is prosecuting Trinity Biotech Nigeria Limited and Nolan as the first and second defendants in the case.

    Also, the EFCC is prosecuting the sister case filed against Resorts Express Concept Nigeria Limited, another company, and Corrado Fantoli as first and second defendants before Justice Okorowo.

    Fantoli, also a foreigner and an associate of Nolan, was one of the suspects behind the alleged $9.6 billion P&ID fraud.

    .

  • Court adjourns Ali Bello, co-defendant’s case till June 19

    Court adjourns Ali Bello, co-defendant’s case till June 19

    A Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday adjourned an amended money-laundering charge instituted against Ali Bello and his co-defendant, Daudu Sulaiman, by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) until June 19.

    Justice James Omotosho adjourned the matter for trial continuation after the EFCC’s counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, led Olom Otane Egoro, a witness, in evidence.

    At the resumed hearing, Oyedepo presented Egoro, a staff of Access Bank from the Compliance Unit, as the 6th prosecution witness (PW6) of the Commission.

    The banker told the court that the EFCC, via a letter, requested for the bank statement of the Kogi State Government House, for the period of 2018 to 2021.

    He said the commission also asked for other documents, including the account opening mandate for the account and certificate of compliance in respect of the printouts.

    Oyedepo tendered the documents through the witness and were admitted in evidence accordingly.

    Though both counsel to the 1st defendant (Ali Bello), Abubakar Aliyu, SAN, and that of the 2nd defendant, Olusegun Jolaawo, SAN, objected to the admissibility of the documents, they elected to raise the points of objection at the final address stage.

    The witness thereafter went through the statement of account, detailing the various deposits into and withdrawals from same via transfers and cash.

    From his evidence, Egoro said the withdrawals were not more than N10 million at any point.

    The witness also did not state who deposited the monies, what the monies were deposited for or who withdrew the same and for what purpose before concluding his testimony for the day.

    Read Also: Court dismisses defamation suit against The Nation Newspaper, Asishana

    Although the matter was initially fixed for May 7 for trial continuation, Aliyu prayed the court for an adjournment on health grounds.

    Tye senior lawyer equally prayed the court to vacate tomorrow’s date.

    Oyedepo and Jolaawo did not oppose Aliyu’s application.

    Justice Omotosho, by agreement of counsel, adjourned the matter until June 19 and June 20 for continuation of trial.

    It would be recalled that Ali Bello and Dauda Suleiman, in the charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/550/2022, are standing trial on a 10-count charge bordering on money laundering brought against them by the anti-graft agency.

    (NAN)

  • Court mandates EFCC to release girl held for mother’s debt

    Court mandates EFCC to release girl held for mother’s debt

    A Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos has ordered the release of a Babcock University student, Miss Oluwateniola Omidiji, detained by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) as a result of a debt owed by her widowed mother, Mrs Omoniyi Omidiji.

    In a fundamental rights lawsuit (FHC/L/CS/759/224), Miss Omidiji alleged that she was taken hostage by EFCC operatives over a debt allegedly owed by her mother to Mr. Charles Nwoko.

    Nwoko said he invested the sum of N100,000,000 into Mrs. Omidiji’s business sometime in 2020 coming after Oluwateniola for the sum and the interest since her mother, his joint venture partner, is out of Nigeria.

    Justice Y. Bogoro gave the order following an application for the enforcement of her fundamental human rights brought by her lawyer, Emeka Chijioke SAN of Auxano Law Chambers. Already Oluwateniola 19, is spending her 11th day in EFCC detention.

    The judge said: “I have considered the ex-parte application, the extant laws under which the application is brought, and the affidavit supporting the application. I hereby grant the reliefs sought.”

    EFCC operatives arrested the third year from her school’s premises on April 26, 2024.

    She was subsequently detained at the agency’s detention facility at Ikoyi Lagos, where she’s been kept since. Justice Bogoro’s order was issued on Friday, May 3, 2024.

    During the investigation, EFCC discovered that four persons were named directors in a company called Elisto Global Services Limited, which Mrs Omidiji allegedly used to receive the money from Mr. Nwoko.

    They are the Applicant’s mother; the alleged creditor, Mr. Nwoko; the Applicant’s brother, and the Applicant.

    Oluwateniola had cried out to the Court for relief after her school was stormed last Friday by EFCC operatives while she was writing exams. They laid siege to the school and took her away.

    EFCC is alleged to have maintained that having been named by her mother as a director of Elisto, the 19-year-old Oluwateniola should answer for her mother’s presumed wrongs in the joint venture with Mr Nwoko.

    Oluwateniola has been detained at EFCC’s facility at Ikoyi until EFCC gets her mother’s attention while other students have since continued with their exams.

    In an application to enforce her fundamental rights filed by her lawyer Chijioke Emeka, SAN of Auxano Law, Oluwateniola contends that she was only a 16-year-old minor when her mother entered into a partnership with Mr. Nwoko and she knows nothing about it.

    Read Also: Court dismisses defamation suit against The Nation Newspaper, Asishana

    She contends that it is wrong for the EFCC to hold her hostage over a wrong alleged to have been done by her mother.

    She further contends that the transaction is a civil matter and asked the Court to order the EFCC to leave her out of the issue and pay her N10,000,000 as damages for the violation of her fundamental rights to human dignity, personal liberty, fair hearing, and freedom of movement.

    Hence, no date has been fixed for the hearing of the case. Justice Bogoro adjourned further hearing in the suit till May 21, 2024.

  • Court adjourns Akingbola’s N50bn lawsuit against CBN

    Court adjourns Akingbola’s N50bn lawsuit against CBN

    A Federal High Court sitting at Ikoyi Lagos has adjourned the hearing of all pending applications in the N50 billion suit, filed by the former Group Managing Director (GMD) of the defunct Intercontinental Bank Plc, Erastus Akingbola till June 26, 2024.

    Justice Kehinde O. Ogundare initially, had fixed last Friday for the hearing of all pending applications, after he had dismissed the application for joinder filed by Access Bank Plc.

    However, at the resumption of proceedings last Friday, Access Bank Plc through its lawyer, I. S. Afolabi, urged the court to stay proceedings in the matter, as his client had filed a notice of appeal before the Lagos division of the Court of Appeal, seeking to upturn the decision of the lower court, which dismissed its application for joinder.

    Afolabi however, informed the court that an appeal had not been entered.

    He therefore urged the court to hear his application, which sought to stay proceedings in the matter till the appeal is entered and determined.

    In response to Access Bank’s application for stay, Akingbola’s lawyer, Osibanjo, informed the court that the application referred to by Access Bank, was served to him on Tuesday and that he is still within time to respond.

    Osibanjo also informed the court that this particular proceeding, was to hear the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and its Governor, challenging the court’s jurisdiction.

    CBN’s lawyer, however, informed the court that he is not opposed to the hearing of the preliminary objection but in the light of the appeal filed by Access Bank, the court.

    Also, the lawyer to the CBN Governor, informed the court that he was ready to move his application dated and filed on February 5, 2024, challenging the court’s jurisdiction.

    Based on the submissions of the counsels, Justice Ogundare, adjourned the matter to June 24, 2024, based his attention has just been drawn to the applicant filed by Access Bank Plc.

    Akingbola had instituted the suit marked FHC/L/CS/903/2009, which is seeking judicial review of the order made on August 14, 2009, by the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), which removed him as the Group Chief Executive Officer of the defunct Intercontinental Bank Plc.

    Akingbola is specifically seeking the following reliefs against the CBN and its governor: “an order setting aside, vacating, nullifying and quashing the order of the first respondent appointing Mr. Joseph Olushola Ajewole and Mr, Lai Alabi, or any other person whosoever, as Acting Deputy Managing Director and Managing Director, respectively, of Intercontinental Bank Plc;

    “An order setting aside, vacating, quashing, and nullifying the Order dated 14/8/2009, made against the Applicant by the first respondent, on behalf of the second respondent, to wit: “removing him as an officer cum Chief Executive of Intercontinental Bank Plc, effective immediately from the date of the Order. And removing him as a director of Intercontinental Bank Plc, effective immediately from the date of the order.

    “An order of certiorari quashing the said Order of the first respondent made against him, for not being in good faith, contrary to due process of law, discriminatory, ultra vires, illegal, unconstitutional, null and void.

    “An order of the Court reinstating him to his lawful position as the Group Chief Executive and Managing Director of Intercontinental Bank plc;

    “An order of perpetual Injunction restraining the respondents, their officers, servants, agents, privies, assigns or any other persons deriving their authorities in any way whatsoever from the respondents, from unlawfully interfering, harassing, victimizing or disturbing the applicant, in any way whatsoever, from the execution of his lawful duties as the Group Chief Executive and a Director of Intercontinental Bank Plc, and from stopping in any way, whatsoever, the benefits, privileged or perquisites enuring to the applicant by his aforesaid office;

    Read Also: Court dismisses defamation suit against The Nation Newspaper, Asishana

    “The sum of N50 billion, as exemplary damages against the respondents, jointly and severally.”

    However, the CBN Governor and the apex bank in their preliminary objections dates and filed on August 25, 2009, asked the court to dismiss the suit or alternatively to strike out the suit.

    The respondents also asked the court for an order to set aside leave to commence the action. And an order that leaves to serve by substituted service and service thereby be set aside.

    The respondents listed the following grounds for the orders sought: “that the Court is coram no judice; and if not,

    “That the Court should decline to exercise its jurisdiction on the matter. That the applicant lacks locus standi to institute or maintain the action against the first respondent; (and if he has standing to sue).

    “That the applicant has no cause of action; (and if at al). And that the applicant has no right of action to maintain the proceedings, and that it will neither be just nor convenient to grant any declaration or injunction in this matter.”

  • Court dismisses defamation suit against The Nation Newspaper, Asishana

    Court dismisses defamation suit against The Nation Newspaper, Asishana

    The High Court of Justice in Niger State has dismissed a defamation suit filed by Mohammed Madami Etsu, the Executive Chairman of the Niger State Internal Revenue Service, against The Nation Newspaper and its Niger state correspondent, Justina Asishana.

    In his suit, Etsu claimed that a publication by the defendants on November 5, 2022, titled “Flood of financial misappropriation hits Niger Revenue Service” was libelous and damaged his reputation.

    He sought damages and an injunction restraining the defendants from further publication.

    In his judgment delivered on Tuesday, March 26, 2024, Justice Mohammed Mohammed of Minna High Court 4, ruled that the defendants’ publication was based on a petition written against the plaintiff by Nuhu Edah of Success Chambers, and as such, the defendants were protected by the doctrine of qualified privilege.

    Read Also: Police confirm kidnap of Abia Archbishop, family in Anambra

    The judge held that the defendants, as a media house and journalist, had a legal and social duty to report matters of public interest, which the petition against the plaintiff fell under.

     He further noted that the plaintiff failed to join Nuhu Edah, the author of the petition, as a defendant in the suit. The court further held that the defendants took reasonable steps to verify the authenticity of the petition and were entitled to qualified privilege.

    The court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims in their entirety with a cost of N500,000 against the plaintiff and in favour of the defendants.

    Reacting to the judgment, the Niger state correspondent, Justina Asishana expressed satisfaction with the court’s decision, stating that The Nation newspaper remained committed to responsible journalism and reporting in the public interest.

    “We are pleased that the court has recognized the importance of press freedom and the media’s role in informing the public about matters of public concern. This judgment is a victory for journalism and the principle of qualified privilege.”

  • Court orders sealing of Abuja Company over tax default 

    Court orders sealing of Abuja Company over tax default 

    A Magistrate Court in Wuse Zone 2 Abuja has ordered the Federal Capital Territory Internal Revenue Service (FCT-IRS) to seal a company – Ifedi A.K. Nigeria Ltd, over the failure of its management to file the mandatory annual returns.

    Magistrate Janada Balami issued the order on Friday, May 3, after the lawyer to FCT-IRS, Michael Towolawi applied orally to have the company sealed to compel it to attend court to answer the complaint filed against it by the FCT-IRS.

    In her ruling, Magistrate Balami said the oral application to seal up the property located at No 6, Rudolf Close, Off Katsina-Ala Street, Maitama, Abuja was granted to compel the attendance of the defendant in court on the next adjourned date.

    She proceeded to adjourn to May 16.

    When the case was called, the company, named as the sole defendant, was not represented.

    Towolawi told the court that the company has consistently failed from 2019 to 2023 to file its annual returns in violation of Section 81 of the Personal Income Tax Act, LFN, 2004, and amended in 2011.

    He said all efforts to make the company comply with the law proved abortive as all notices served on the company, which were duly acknowledged, were not acted on.

    Read Also: Strengthen court of arbitration to woo more investors into the country, Senior lawyers urge FG

    Towolawi said a notice to prosecute was also served on the defendant on March 6, 2024, but without any response.

    Speaking shortly after the court proceedings, the Director of Legal Services at the FCT-IRS, Festus Tsavar, said Ifedi A. K. Nigeria Ltd is one of such many companies in the FCT that would be prosecuted for tax-related offences.

    He said the law requires “a company to file returns from 1st to 31st of January. Then, an individual is also expected to file from the 1st of January to the 31st of March. 

    “Once this period has passed and you have not filed, you have committed an offence contrary to Section 81, of the Personal Income Tax Act, laws of the Federation 2004 as amended in 2011. 

    “Once you are convicted the law provides that, upon conviction, you will pay a fine of N500,000 if it is a company, and in the case of an individual, the fine is N50,000 for each year of default.

    “You also risk a jail of 6 months imprisonment and a fine can be one option or both, depending on the discretion of the court.

    “In FCT we have actually just commenced the prosecution of defaulters and it is not going to be a one-off. 

    “One thing that is important for the public to know is that we are going to continue prosecuting them if they don’t comply with the tax laws because non-compliance is an offence.

    “Take for instance the issue of filing of returns, if you file within the period you have not committed an offence and you are also not going to pay during the period of filing, you are not going to pay when you come to file, nobody is going to take money from you,” Tsavar said.

  • Court vacates order declaring Rivers CoS, Edison, others wanted

    Court vacates order declaring Rivers CoS, Edison, others wanted

    The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has vacated an ex-parte order secured on January 31st by the Inspector-General of Police declaring the Chief of Staff, Rivers State Government House, Edison Ehie, wanted.

    The court set aside the order while ruling on a motion on notice brought by Jinjiri Bala, Happy Benneth, Progress Joseph, Adokiye Oyagiri and Chibuike Peter named as 2nd to 6th defendants challenging the order that declared them alongside Ehie.

    The respondents/applicants had approached the court praying an order setting aside the ex-parte order made on the 31st of January for want of jurisdiction.

    “An order staying the execution of the order made on the 31st of January pending the determination of the application”.

    Among the grounds of the application, the respondents/applicants argued that the complainant/respondent had not filed any charge or motion on notice before honourable court.

    They further posited that the complainant/respondent did not file any criminal charge in the court and that the court lacked the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the application ex-parte as the alleged offences of conspiracy, attempted murder, murder and arson took place in Port Harcourt, Rivers State.

    The court in a copy of its ruling dated April 29th and delivered by Justice Emeka Nwite, granted the prayers of the respondents/applicants and stayed the execution of the order pending the determination of the motion on notice.

    Read Also: DSS denies shooting man at Lagos filling station

    Nwite said: “I agree with the submission of the learned counsel to the second and 6th respondents that since the honourable court is not par of police investigation, it’s power to grant an application for the arrest of a person is limited to appending criminal case.

    “Since the respondent did not file any charge before the honourable court, the application for the arrest of the applicants and to have them declared wanted is illegal, null and void hence on this ground alone, the order made by the honourable court on the 31st day of January, 2024 is hereby set aside”.

    The judge also affirmed that the court lacked the jurisdiction to grant the ex-parte order that declared Edison and others wanted on alleged case of felony, conspiracy and murder.

    Relying on some judicial precedents, the judge said: “It is obvious that a court is not functus Officio in setting aside an order, which is made without jurisdiction.

    ‘I sum, I am of the humble view and I so hold that the order made by this honourable court on the 31st day of January 2024 for the warrant of arrest of the applicants and to have them declared wanted is made without jurisdiction and same is hereby set aside.