Tag: Court

  • Magu: Appeal Court orders bank to pay N540m damages 

    Magu: Appeal Court orders bank to pay N540m damages 

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja has ordered a popular commercial bank to pay N540 million that a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) awarded against it for defaming a preacher, Emmanuel Omale, of the Divine Hand of God Prophetic Ministry, and his wife, Deborah.

    In a judgment delivered on October 4, 2022, Justice Yusuf Halilu of the FCT High Court held that the bank recklessly breached the duty of care it owes to the claimants – Omale, his wife, and their church – by making false claim that former Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ibrahim Magu, paid N573 million to the church’s account.

    The Court of Appeal, in a ruling on February 1, rejected the bank’s request for a stay of execution of the judgment pending the determination its appeal, as prayed in a motion on notice it filed.

    Instead, a three-member panel, presided over by Justice Muhammed Shuaibu, granted a conditional stay of the execution of the judgment by ordering the bank to pay the judgment sum of N540 million into an interest-yielding account in the name of the court’s Chief Registrar.

    In an enrolled copy of the ruling our correspondent sighted yesterday, the appellate court said: “The application is granted as prayed in terms of the first prayer in the appellant’s motion filed on 3/11/2022.

    “Consequently, conditional stay of execution of the judgment is hereby granted to the appellant.

    “The condition being that the judgment sum shall be deposited into an interest-yielding bank account of the court to be opened by the Chief Registrar of this court within 48 hours of the grant of this order.”

    The court adjourned further hearing till a date to be communicated to parties by the court’s registry.

    The conditional stay granted by the Court of Appeal was alternatively conceded by the respondents – Omale, his wife, and the church – in their counter-affidavit to the appellant’s motion, which they had sought to be dismissed.

    The October 4 judgment by Justice Halilu was on a defamation suit filed by Omale, his wife, and the church against the bank.

    Read Also: All eyes on MPC to strengthen naira’s correction

    During the investigation of Magu by the Justice Isa Salami-led presidential investigation panel, it was claimed that an investigation by the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU) revealed that the ex-EFCC chairman paid N573 million into Omale’s church’s account for allegedly buying a property in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

    Justice Halilu held that evidence before his court showed that the bank admitted that there was an error in its report to the NFIU in its entries into Divine Hand of God Prophetic Ministry’s account.

    The judge also held that the bank’s claimed that the purported N573 million was wrongly reflected as credit entry in Divine Hand of God Prophetic Ministry’s account by its reporting             system, which it recently upgraded.

    Justice Halilu said the bank admitted the error, which caused incalculable damage to the reputation of the claimants within and outside the country.

    He also held that the claimants provided sufficient evidence to establish a case of negligence against the bank.

    Justice Halilu awarded N200 million as aggravated damages, N140,500,000 as specific damages, and N200 million as general damages.

  • Ecobank vs Anchorage: Court rules on application March 13

    Ecobank vs Anchorage: Court rules on application March 13

    Federal High Court in Lagos has fixed March 13 to rule on a pending application in an alleged debt dispute between Anchorage Leisures & two others versus Ecobank Nigeria.

    The parties in suit FHC/L/CS/352/2023 are Anchorage Leisures, Siloam Global and Honeywell Flour Mills as plaintiffs/respondents, while Ecobank is defendant/counterclaimant.

    Justice Yellim Bogoro fixed the date after hearing Anchorage’s motion for amendment of its  Writ of Summons argued by Bode Olanipekun and Ecobank’s Counter-Affidavit and Further Counter-Affidavit opposing the application argued by Kunle Ogunba.

    The suit arose following a January 27, 2023, Supreme Court judgment which Ecobank alleged affirmed the indebtedness of Honeywell and connected firms to it, for N13 billion as of 2023.

    But the plaintiffs instituted the instant suit at Federal High Court in Lagos, contending, among others, that the Supreme Court did not give a figure in its judgment.

    At a prior hearing, the court, following an application by Ecobank’s lawyer, Ogunba, granted the bank leave to join Dr. Oba Otudeko, Flour Mills and Honeywell Group as defendants to its counter-claim seeking to recover the alleged debt.

    The joined firms are or were either owned by or connected to Otudeko.

    At commencement of proceedings, Olanipekun represented the plaintiffs, while Ogunba appeared for the defendant/counterclaimant.

    Oluwashobo Adeola, holding the brief of Elijah Akefe, appeared for the fourth defendant to the counterclaim, Abimbola Akeredolu  represented the fifth defendant to the counterclaim, Taiwo Osipitan appeared for the sixth defendant to the counterclaim.

    Read Also: Adeleke issues 24-hour ultimatum to warring communities to submit arms

    Olanipekun reminded the court that at the last adjourned date, it set down the plaintiffs’ motion dated October 23 for amendment of its Writ of Summons (and other originating processes) for hearing.

    Ogunba informed the court that the defendant/counterclaimant had a preliminary objection to the plaintiffs’ application for amendment, while Osipitan argued the defendant/counterclaimant’s application went further to seek summary judgment against all defendant.

    After a contention about whether the court could hear the preliminary objection with the plaintiffs’ application for amendment; the court held it would hear the motion for amendment, before the Notice of Preliminary Objection.

    The judge also heard and granted the bank’s application for leave to file a Further Counter-Affidavit to the Plaintiffs’ application for amendment.

    While Olanipekun moved the Plaintiffs’ application for amendment, Ogunba adopted the Counter-Affidavit and Further Counter-Affidavit in opposition.

    Justice Bogoro adjourned till March 13 for ruling.                     

  • Heavy security as court remands Adeleke’s associate over murder charge

    Heavy security as court remands Adeleke’s associate over murder charge

    There was heavy security at the  Federal High Court sitting in Osogbo, Osun State, yesterday, when an associate of Governor Ademola Adeleke, Olalekan Oyeyemi (Emir) was arraigned for alleged murder of four residents, Oyewale Sharif, Muraina Olayiwole, Tope and Tajudeen Rabiu, as well as possession of firearms.

    Oyeyemi, who was appointed member of the Disciplinary Committee, Osun State Public Transportation System by Adeleke, was arrested last September 13 for alleged murder and illegal possession of firearms.

    He was charged with 11 counts of murder, possession of firearms and razing of a car. 

    At the arraignment yesterday, the police prosecutor, Umar Alli urged the court to replace the earlier holden charge of October 16, 2023, with a fresh one dated January 31.

    Read Also: Tinubu to University unions: prioritise dialogue to avoid frequent strikes

    However, the charge against the defendant was not read to him as his lawyer, Edmund Biriomoni challenged the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the case.

    He argued that the court cannot take the plea of the defendant.

    Alli opposed the objection by the defendant’s counsel, saying, Section 397(2) and 377 part 37, stated that objections can be raised after the plea had been taken. 

    The presiding judge, Justice Emmanuel ordered that the defendant be remanded in Ife Correctional Facility and adjourned the matter till March 5, to entertain a formal application to challenge jurisdiction.

  • Court jails actress for spraying, stepping on new Naira notes

    Court jails actress for spraying, stepping on new Naira notes

    An actress, Oluwadarasimi Omoseyin, has been sentenced to six months in jail by Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos for stepping on and spraying the new Naira notes at a social gathering in Lagos.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) reported her conviction in a statement on its X page on Thursday.

    The anti-graft agency said: “She was first arraigned on February 13, 2023, by the Lagos Zonal Command of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on two-count charges, to which she pleaded “not guilty”.

    She was subsequently granted bail on February 15, 2023.

    The statement reads partly: “That you, Oluwadarasimi Omoseyin, on the 28th day of January 2023, at Monarch Event Centre, Lekki, Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, whilst dancing during a social occasion tampered with the sum of N100,000.00 (One Hundred Thousand Naira) issued by the Central Bank of Nigeria by spraying same in the said occasion and you thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 21(1) of the Central Bank Act, 2007.”

    At the resumed hearing on Thursday, Omoseyin changed her “not guilty” plea to “guilty” because of the overwhelming evidence against her.

    Read Also: Court judgment: Lalong cautions APC stakeholders against chaos

    Following her “guilty plea”, the prosecution counsel, Z.B. Atiku called Abubakar Mohammed Marafa, an operative of the EFCC to review the facts of the matter.

    Marafa recalled that “the defendant was arrested by officers of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) on February 1, 2023, and was handed over to the Commission on February 2, 2023, for further investigation.“

    “The defendant was processed and the videos of where she sprayed the money was found on her phone. Also, further investigations were carried out and the management of the event centre was invited. They also brought in the video footage of the said event.”

    Judge Aneke delivered the verdict, sentencing the defendant to six months in jail, starting on Thursday, with the option to pay a fine of N300,000.00 into the Federation’s Consolidated revenue account.

  • BREAKING: Court orders arrest of Fubara’s CoS, five others

    BREAKING: Court orders arrest of Fubara’s CoS, five others

    The Federal High Court Abuja has issued a warrant for the arrest of Edison Ehie, the Chief of Staff to Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, over his alleged involvement in the burning of the State House of Assembly.

    Ehie is also the immediate past Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly.

    In a Judgement by Justice Emeka Nwite, Ehie was ordered to be arrested along with five other persons based in Port Harcourt for allegedly participating in some criminal activities.

    Read Also: Fubara’s love for peace

    Those ordered to be arrested along with the former Speaker are Jinjiri Bala, Happy Benedict, Progress Joseph, Adokiye Oyagiri and Chibuike Peter also known as Rambo.

    Justice Nwite granted an order on Wednesday for their arrest while delivering a ruling in an ex-parte application brought before him by the Inspector General of Police IGP.

    The ex-parte application was predicated on sections 37, 113, 114, 84 and 184 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015 and section 35 of the 1999 Constitution as well as 32 of the Police Act 2020.

    Details shortly…

  • Court orders Umeh to repay N136m bank debt with interest

    Court orders Umeh to repay N136m bank debt with interest

    • Senator’s bank investment ordered to be forfeited

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has order ed the senator representing Anambra Central, Victor Umeh, to pay N135,722,303.40 along with accrued interest to the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) over his unpaid bank loan.

    Justice Inyang Ekwo issued the order in a judgment delivered on Monday in a suit filed by AMCON.

    Justice Ekwo, who declared that Umeh was actually indebted to AMCON, issued an order directing the forfeiture of the senator’s 5,000,000 units of Skye Bank shares in the records of the Central Securities and Clearing System to AMCON.

    The judge also awarded a cost of N2 million in favour of AMCON and against Umeh, who is currently the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Diaspora.

    A court documents filed by AMCON showed that Umeh got a loan of N23,250,000.00 from the now defunct Skye Bank in January 2008 “to enable him invest in and purchase shares of a financial institution in Nigeria”.

    The document added: “The tenor of the credit facility granted the defendant was specifically fixed for 356 days.

    “The offer letter contained various other explicit terms and conditions which the defendant accepted by duly executing the memorandum of acceptance.

    “The defendant utilised the funds granted to him as credit facility by the bank. However, at the expiration of the tenor of the facility, the defendant failed and neglected to liquidate the credit facility as per the contract.”

    AMCON averred that it later acquired the unpaid debt when Skye Bank could not make Umeh to repay his loan.

    The corporation explained that its suit was meant to recover the debt, which stood at N135,722,303.40k as at April 2011.

    In his judgment, Justice Ekwo held that despite being served with court documents on the case, Umeh failed to file any response or make any effort to enter a defence.

    Read Also: Court to hear Atiku’s ex-aide’s suit against PDP chairman, others February 8

    The judge added that despite Umeh’s failure to file a defence, the plaintiff proved its case through the evidence it presented.

    He held that by the evidence presented by the plaintiff, “the indebtedness of the defendant has been proved”.

    Justice Ekwo added: “I find that the plaintiff has established its case by preponderance of evidence, as required by law.

    “Consequently, judgment is entered per terms as follows:

    * “A declaration is hereby made that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff, in the sum of N135,722,303.40, representing the principal debt sum plus all the accrued interest and charges, at the rate of 15 per cent per annum drawn up to January 25, 2021, being the sum due and outstanding from the defendant to the plaintiff.

     * “A declaration is hereby made mandating the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of N135,722,303.40, representing the principal debt sum, plus all the accrued interest and charges at the rate of 15 per cent per annum drawn up to January 25, 2021, in settlement of the debt due and outstanding from the defendant to the plaintiff,”  among others.        

  • Court to hear Atiku’s ex-aide’s suit against PDP chairman, others February 8

    Court to hear Atiku’s ex-aide’s suit against PDP chairman, others February 8

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has scheduled a hearing for February 8 on a suit brought against the national chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Umar Damagum and other national leaders of the party.

    The suit, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/70/2024 was filed by a chieftain of the party and one-time spokesman of the candidate of the PDP in the last presidential election, Atiku Abubakar, Segun Sowunmi.

    Sowunmi, a former governorship candidate of the PDP in Ogun state, wants the court to among others restrain Damagum and other national leaders of the PDP from further acting in their official capacities given their alleged failure to convene the mandatory National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting for over a year now.

    He stated that since the meeting was last held on September 8, 2022, during the tenure of the sacked Chairman, Iyorchia Ayu, the new leadership under Damagum has failed to convene NEC meetings to enable its members to review the party’s activities, take critical decisions and plan for future elections, despite demands by concerned party members.

    At the mention of the case on Tuesday, the plaintiff’s lawyer, Anderson Asemota told the court that the matter was coming up for the first time and that the plaintiff has not been able to effect service of court documents on all the defendants.

    “My lord, it is based on this that I have filed a motion for substituted service, unfortunately, it is not in the records of the court.

    “In view of this, we shall be asking for a short date to enable us take our motion for substituted service,” Asemota added.

    Ruling, Justice Mobolaji Olajuwon directed Asemota to make another attempt at serving the remaining defendants personally and give a report of service on the next adjourned date.

    Justice Olajuwon then adjourned till February 8 for a report of service or for the plaintiff to present his argument on the motion for substituted service.

    Listed with Damagum as defendants in the suit are the PDP, Senator Samuel Anyanwu (National Secretary), Umar Nature (National Organizing Secretary), Okechukwu Daniel (National Auditor), Ahmed Yayari (National Treasurer), Muhammed Kadade (National Youth Leader) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    Sowumi is contending that not only did the failure of the party’s leadership to hold NEC meeting violate the party’s constitution, it is inimical to the progress of the party and threatens his fortune and those of other members, who plan to contest future elections

    He stated, in a supporting affidavit that since the party participated in the last governorship elections in Bayelsa, Kogi and Imo states, the reports of the elections have not been presented to the party as required.

    He added that elections are coming up in Edo and Ondo state elections and the party needs to also plan and prepare ahead, “which preparation and planning can only be done at the meeting of the members of the NEC.

    Sowumi stated that “by the provisions of Articles 31(2)(4) &(5) of the party’s constitution, Damagum and leaders of the PDP “are obligated to call for or cause to be called and held quarterly or at the request of one-third of members of the NEC of the PDP the meeting of the NEC of the PDP at which they shall present proposed guidelines and regulations governing the conduct of elections to the party offices at all levels, and procedure of selecting party candidates for elective offices to the members of the NEC.

    He added that “there are other critical issues which the party need to discuss during the NEC meeting.

    “The NEC is saddled with the responsibility of fixing and approving the date for the party’s National Convention which is the highest decision-making organ of the party.

    “The NEC is the organ that would determine when the convention will hold, organize and what will transpire there.

    “By their conduct and actions aforesaid the 2nd to 7th defendants are acting in breach and violation of the constitution of the 1st defendant (PDP) and the provision of the Electoral Act, 2022 which may have fatal consequences for the smooth and continuous running of the 1st defendant as a political party in Nigeria,” he said.

    Read Also: Court orders Senator Umeh to repay N136m bank debt with interest to AMCON

    Sowunmi wants the court to among others, issue an order of perpetual injunction restraining Damagum and others, including their agents “from functioning or continuing to function or discharge the functions of their offices until they call for or cause to be called and held meeting of the NEC of the PDP in total fidelity and obeisance to the PDP constitution.”

    He also wants the court to order the party’s leadership “to immediately call for or cause to be called and held the meeting of the National Executive Committee of the PDP to present the activities of the party from the date of the last NEC meeting which was held on 8th September, 2022.”

    The plaintiff is equally seeking an order directing Damagum and others “to immediately call for or cause to be called and held the meeting of the NEC of the PDP to present the proposed guidelines and regulations governing the conduct of elections to the party offices at all levels and procedure for selecting party candidates for elective offices to the members of the NEC.”

  • Supreme Court dismisses cases against Tinubu, Buhari, INEC, AGF

    Supreme Court dismisses cases against Tinubu, Buhari, INEC, AGF

    • Apex court reserves judgment in appeal by APC’s Binani against PDP’s Fintiri’s election
    • APC’s request to review judgment in Akwa Ibom governorship dispute rejected

    The Supreme Court yesterday dismissed two appeals filed against President Bola Tinubu, ex-President Muhammadu Buhari, the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) by a former presidential candidate of the defunct Hope Democratic Party (HDP), Ambrose Albert Owuru, and his party.

    A five-member panel of the apex court, presided over by Justice John Okoro, in a unanimous decision, held that the appeal was frivolous and dismissed it after it directed the applicant’s lawyer, Habeeb Olawuyi, to withdraw it.

    While other members of the panel expressed discomfort about the lawyer’s conduct and the quality of the case he brought, Justice Okoro directed him to withdraw the appeal, and he promptly did.

    Justice Okoro advised Olawuyi never to bring such a frivolous case before the court.

    The appeal by Owuru and the HDP was against the May 25, 2023 judgment of the Court of Appeal in Abia State, which affirmed the January 30, 2023 judgment by Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja.

    The judge had dismissed Owuru’s and his party’s suit seeking to prevent the May 29, 2023 inauguration.

    They had sought to be sworn in as Buhari’s successor, claiming that Owuru had an unspent tenure, having purportedly been elected Nigeria’s president via a referendum conducted in 2019.

    Owuru claimed, among others, that he won a referendum purportedly conducted within the period of the postponement of the 2019 presidential election.

    He also argued that by the victory he recorded in the 2019 referendum, no other person should occupy the office of the president until he served out his tenure.

    The Election Petitions Tribunal dismissed Owuru’s petition in its August 22, 2029 judgment, saying, among others, that issue of referendum raised in the petition did not form a ground to challenge the outcome of an election.

    In its May 25, 2023 judgment, a three-member panel of the Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed Owuru’s and his party’s appeals and awarded N40 million cost against them.

    In the lead judgment of the Court of Appeal, Justice Jamil Tukur held, among others, that the appeal was an invitation on the court to review its earlier decision, which it could not do.

    The judge dismissed the appeal and ordered Owuru to pay each of the respondents N10 million in cost.

    Also yesterday, the Supreme Court dismissed another appeal filed by INEC and its chairman on the grounds that it was frivolous.

    When the appeal was called before appellant’s lawyer, Bofede Ogboru, could introduce the appeal, Justice Okoro directed him to withdraw it because the court was not ready to have its time wasted.

    Members of the court’s panel insisted that the lawyer should withdraw the appeal, and he did.

    The Supreme Court earlier rejected a motion filed by the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the last governorship election in Akwa Ibom State, Akanimo Udofia, and his party.

    By their motion, Udofia and the APC had prayed the court to constitute a full panel of the court, consisting of seven Justices, for the purpose of reviewing the court’s earlier judgment delivered on January 11.

    Read Also: Tinubu approves $700m roads to boost business activities at Lekki Port

    In the judgment, the apex court dismissed the appeal filed by Udofia and the APC with which they sought to void the election of Akwa Ibom State Governor Umo Eno of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    When the case was called yesterday, lawyer to the applicant (Udofia and the APC), Dr. O. U. Orji, told the court that the case file was only handed to him the previous day and that he had not properly studied it.

    When the court asked him what he wanted to do with the appeal, Orji said he would have prayed the court for an adjournment, but was advised against it by his client, who he said insisted that he must go ahead with the case.

    This prompted a member of the court’s seven-member panel, Justice Tijjani Abubakar, to ask Orji if it was not proper, as an officer of the court, to do what was right before the court rather than allow himself to be dictated to by his client.

    Although Orji sought to proceed with the case, the court prevailed on him to withdraw it because it was deemed frivolous.

    He withdrew it and Justice Uwani Abba-Aji, who presided over the panel, dismissed the motion.

    Also, the Supreme Court yesterday reserved judgment in the appeal by the APC candidate in the last governorship election in Adamawa State, Aisha Dahiru (also called Binani), and her party.

    Dahiru and APC are seeking a reverse of Court of Appeal’s judgment which affirmed the decision of the election petitions tribunal which dismissed their petition against the victory of Governor Ahmadu Fintiri of the PDP.

    Arguing the appeal, appellants’ lawyer, Akin Olujimi (SAN), urged the court to allow the appeal.

    The lawyer argued that the Court of Appeal did not address the question of whether or not the INEC Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) in the state had the authority to declare a winner in an election. 

    Fintiri’s lawyer, Damian Dodo (SAN), prayed the court to dismiss the appeal.

    Dodo argued that the REC had no power to declare the winner of the election.

    Justice John Okoro, who presided over the court’s five-member panel, asked Dodo to read the provision of Section 149 of the Electoral Act, and he did.

    The lawyer argued that the REC perpetrated an illegality by announcing the election results, adding that he never showed up to defend his actions during proceedings at the tribunal. 

    Lawyer to INEC, Abubakar Ahmed, also urged the court to dismiss appeal for being unmeritorious.

  • Ikorodu kingship tussle: Appeal  Court fixes April 9 for hearing

    Ikorodu kingship tussle: Appeal  Court fixes April 9 for hearing

    • By Bode Monogbe

    The Court of Appeal, Lagos Division has  adjourned the Ikorodu Kingship tussle till April 9, 2024, for hearing of pending applications.

    The suit is challenging the judgment of a Lagos Court, delivered by Justice Akintunde Savage, which ratified Kabiru Adewale Shotobi as the Oba Ayangburen of Ikorodu, Lagos State.

    The three-member panel presided over by Justice Muhammed Mustapha adjourned the suit to enable the appellants regularize their pending applications.

    Other members of the panel are Justice Folashade Ojo and Justice Abdullahi Bayero.

    The appellants (Lambo branch of Lasunwon ruling house) are challenging the installation of Kabiru Adewale Shotobi as the Oba Ayangburen of Ikorodu, Lagos State.

    They are  praying the Court of Appeal to set aside the judgment of the lower court.

    The appellants are  Mathew Shodipo, Omobo Sokelu, Shakiru Shodipo,  Nurudeen Fakomaya and  Albert Ania.

    The family is praying the court to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the lower court.

    They urged the court to hold that the third to sixth respondents are kingmakers of Ikorodu and privies to Mr Z.O. Aro in Exhibit A who was sued as and on behalf of the kingmakers.

    Read Also: Ondo public servants accuse Ayedatiwa of extravagant spending

    Besides, appellants stated that the trial judge erred in law in holding that clause 2 of the consent judgment in suit No. IKD57/2007 did not preclude the Adegorushe branch form presenting a candidate nor preclude the second respondent from being nominated as candidate for the vacant Ayangburen title of Ikorodu.

    “The interpretation by the honourable court took away cause of action and as brought by the applicants and extended it beyond the reliefs sought by the applicants in the response sought by the respondents.

    “The learned trial judge misdirected himself in holding that suit No IKD/57/2007, is subsisting having not been appealed against yet, that the 3rd to 6th respondents are not bound by it but bound only by his judgement.

    “The learned trial judge having extensively dealt with the issue of waiver raised by the respondents, refused and neglected to ascribe nor articulated on the issue of estoppel in pairs, raised by appellants nor pronounce on same.’’

  • Alleged cyber-stalking: Court grants Bayelsa online news publisher bail

    Alleged cyber-stalking: Court grants Bayelsa online news publisher bail

    Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has granted bail to Saint Onitsha Mienpamo, a news blogger and owner of the online publication Naija Live TV based in Bayelsa State

    Mienpamo is facing charges of alleged cyber-stalking in suit no. FJC/ABJ/CR/492/2023, with the Inspector-General of Police as the complainant and Mienapamo as the defendant. 

    After his arraignment, Mienpamo was remanded in Kuje Correctional Centre. 

    During the bail application hearing, prosecuting counsel, Victor Okoye opposed the bail request, expressing concerns about the defendant’s potential to flee while on bail.

    But the defence counsel, Benjamin A. Ogbara, argued that despite the opposition put forward by the prosecution lawyer, which to him was unfounded, the court had the discretional power to admit him to bail.

    The presiding Judge, Justice Emeka Nwite, after listening to the submissions of the prosecuting counsel, Victor Okoye, and that of the defence counsel, Benjamin Ogbara, granted bail to Mienpamo pending the determination of the trial.

    Justice Nwite, while granting the bail application, however, stated that the defendant had shown that he was willing to defend the case preferred against him and ready to cooperate with the court by not jumping bail. 

    He also stated that despite the argument put forward by the prosecution counsel on the possibility of the defendant jumping bail, “there is no concrete evidence before the court to buttress the assertion. And I hereby grant the defendant bail in the interest of justice.” 

    The first condition of the bail is the payment of N10m and two sureties in like sum and that one of the sureties shall possess a landed property within the court’s jurisdiction and that the document to the landed property must be verified by the Deputy Registrar of the court.

    The second surety must be a responsible citizen of this country and both counsel together with the sureties must each deposit two copies of their recent photographs with the Deputy Registrar of the court.

    The bail conditions further indicated “that the residences of the sureties must be verified and confirmed by the registrar of the court.”

    Justice Nwite, however, adjourned the case until March 19, 2024, for trial.

    Recall that the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja had on November 2, 2023, ordered that Mienpamo be remanded at the Kuje Custodial Centre over alleged defamation and cyberstalking of the Interim Administrator of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP), Major General Barry Ndiomu (rtd.).

    The defendant was also accused of three counts of alleged willful libel, threat, and causing danger and insult against Ndiomu.

    When the charges were read to him at the commencement of the hearing, Mienpamo had reportedly pleaded ‘not guilty’ to them.