Tag: courts

  • Judges seek to wash hands off pre-election cases

    Judges seek to wash hands off pre-election cases

    • Frown at disregard of court’s decisions by other arms of govt

    Judges have called for the ousting of court’s jurisdiction on pre-election cases to reduce the heavy workload of most courts.

    The judicial officers noted that pre-election cases contribute significantly to the backlog of cases before the courts.

    They suggested that such cases should “be non-justiciable and be addressed internally by political parties.

    According to them, a pre-election litigation is one of the challenges currently burdening the Judiciary”.

    The judges stressed the need for improved adherence to the doctrine of separation of powers; enhanced funding to guarantee judicial independence, and judicial officers to abide by their code of conduct and shun unethical practices.

    These formed part of the resolutions taken at the 2015 All Nigeria Judges’ Conference (ANJC) of superior courts of record, held between November 17 and 21 at the National Judicial Institute (NJI) in Abuja under the theme: Building A Confident Judiciary.

    The resolutions are contained in a communique issued at the end of the conference.

    The communiqué reads:

    •That pre-election matters should be non-justiciable and should be addressed internally by political parties, as a pre-election litigation is one of the challenges currently burdening the Nigerian Judiciary, and it contributes significantly to the backlog of cases before the courts.

    •That respect for the separation of powers is fundamental, with effective coordination among the arms of government required for good governance, political stability, and avoidance of institutional friction.

    •That judicial independence and efficiency will be enhanced by adequate funding, requiring collaborative commitment from all arms of government to strengthen the courts.

    •That all arms of government must obey judicial decisions, exercise the right of appeal where necessary, and respect the Judiciary as a protector of the people’s rights.

    Read Also: Tinubu orders 24-hour aerial surveillance, tightens security cordon over Kwara, Kebbi forests

    •That adherence to the Rule of Law is indispensable for sustaining democracy, ensuring national stability, and preventing regression into undemocratic practices.

    •That the modernisation of judicial infrastructure and digitalization of court processes remain essential priorities, ensuring every court in Nigeria benefits from technology-driven justice delivery.

    •That continuous judicial training, welfare, and independence are critical, with the National Judicial Institute sustaining its role as the hub for professional development and intellectual renewal.

    •That justice must be guaranteed, swift, affordable, and accessible to all.

    •That integrity is the foundation of justice, and corruption within the Judiciary must be firmly, transparently, and consistently addressed to safeguard public trust.

    •That the confidence of the public is the true currency of the Judiciary, requiring judgments that are fair, impartial, and untainted.

    •That judicial ethics must be uncompromising, requiring strict adherence to the Code of Conduct, avoidance of conflicts of interest, responsible public engagement, and protection of confidential information.

    •That the National Judicial Council must strengthen disciplinary oversight, enforcing firm actions against misconduct while curbing frivolous and malicious petitions that undermine judicial morale.

    •That injunctions must be granted with utmost caution, guided by established principles, avoidance of self-induced urgency, and prioritising expeditious hearing of substantive matters.

    •That consistency and professionalism must guide judicial processes, discouraging counter orders by courts of coordinate jurisdiction, enforcing timely disclosures, and enhancing pre trial case management.

    •That broader justice sector reforms are necessary, including expanded legal aid, transparent justice data, full ACJA implementation, improved police prosecution standards, and correctional centres reforms that reduce pre-trial detention.

    •That the safety and security of all judicial officers of the federation is of utmost importance. Security agencies must, therefore, take proactive measures to raise awareness and educate court staff, judges’ families, aides, and other associates on the need for security consciousness.

    •That there should be effective planning, case management and ADR mechanisms employed in the courts for the expeditious disposal of cases.

    •That the National Judicial Council should do more than write letters of commendation to judges who do well in their courts, but also look into the quality of the judgments submitted for purposes of elevation and performance evaluation.

    •That there is a need to reconsider the position of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), on the jurisdiction of the Sharia Court of Appeal and the Customary Court of Appeal.

    •That judicial officers should maintain a healthy lifestyle and diet to enhance the performance of their judicial functions.

    •That the Judiciary’s commitment, through the National Judicial Institute’s trainings and other inter-agency collaborations, has resulted in the delisting of Nigeria from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Grey List.

    “This reinforces the duty to strengthen Nigeria’s anti-money laundering, combating the financing of terrorism, and countering proliferation financing (AML/ CFT/CPF) regime, and to encourage a judiciary-wide dedication to the integrity of our justice system.”

  • Lawyer flays attack on courts over rulings

    Lawyer flays attack on courts over rulings

    A Lawyer and President-General, Central Council of Ibadan Indigenes (CCII) Chief Ajeniyi Ajewole has cautioned the members of the public from hauliing insults and blaming judges when court churn out rulings and judgement which may seem contradictory.

    Apparently reacting to the spate of rulings that are generating controversies that led to the recent conduct of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) Convention in Ibadan, Oyo State, Ajewole said no two cases are exactly the same and facts presented before the court may also not be the same.

     Noting that giving conflicting judgement may not be healthy for the judicial system, Ajewole, however said people must make deliberate efforts to understand the proceedings and facts presented before the courts that led to any judgements delivered before condemning any decision of the court in any matter.

     He spoke on Wednesday while featuring as the Guest of the Month of the Oyo State owned broadcasting station, Broadcasting Corporation of Oyo State (BCOS), Bashorun Ibadan.

    Read Also: Targeting of schools by bandits poses grave danger to Nigeria’s educational system – Rep Garba

    He said: “Having conflicting rulings and judgements is not good for the country but let us warn observes, most times we don’t know what has been presented before each court before we condemn the judgements.

    “To the best of my knowledge as a lawyer, judgements are given based on what we are presenting before the courts.

    “Judges are human beings and they give rulings based on the facts before them. Even if you have two courtroom beside each other, the caes cannot be the same, they van only be identical.

    “What a lawyer presents before Court A may be different from what was presented before Court B and judges give rulings based on what is before them.”

  • Dilapidated courts

    Dilapidated courts

    •It’s high time the federal and state governments gave the temples of justice the desired attention

    The expose about the poor funding and decrepit state of federal and state courts across the country, by ‘The Guardian’ Newspaper, last week, is a wakeup call to the federal and state governments to prioritise the welfare of judicial officers and rehabilitation of the courts and other judicial infrastructure across the country. Sadly, even with the advent of democracy in 1999, there has been poor budgetary allocation to the judicial sector, over the years.

    To stem the challenge, the federal and state budgetary processes must make a concerted effort to bridge the gap, considering that the judiciary, by its constitutional limitations, cannot solve the problem by itself.

    Unlike the judicial arm of government, the executive prepares the budget and warehouses the approved budgeted funds, while the legislature reviews the budget proposal and gives its approval, actions that place the two arms at the sharing table of the resources of the federal and state governments.

    The essay showed that in the 2024 federal budget, only about N5.3billion was earmarked for capital projects, and N8.8 billion for recurrent expenditure, for the judicial sector. Those allocations are abysmally low, in a budget that had N7.72 trillion for capital expenditure and N9.92 trillion for non-debts recurrent expenditure, for the same period. Unfortunately, what happens at the federal level is replicated at the state level of government across the country.

    The report captured the sorry state of the Federal High Court in Lagos, which is unarguably the busiest in the country. It says: “files are piled so high that they form walls. Lawyers squeeze into overcrowded rooms, sweating as fans’ blades whir weakly or not at all. Wooden benches creak routinely as the air smells of sweat and paper”.

    We wonder how efficient the judicial process conducted in such an unfriendly environment would be, and of course, the by-product reverberates across other sectors of the nation’s life.

    Read Also: Nigeria, UK reaffirm commitment to deepening ties

    The report also portrayed the stifling state of affairs in the Ikeja Division of the Lagos State High Court, despite the innovative actions by the present leadership. It says: “The once-imposing Ikeja High Court Complex now looks tired, its walls discoloured, its ceilings caving in, and its air thick with dampness and dust. The walls, originally cream and smooth, are now streaked with mucus-like patches of mold, dirt, and water stains. In many parts, paint peels off in large flakes, exposing rough concrete beneath.”

    Similar state of disrepair is witnessed in states across the country. In Ondo: “On a grey morning in June 2025, rain hammered the rusty roof of High Court 1 in Ondo Judicial Division until the roof gave way. Water streamed onto the judge’s bench, soaking wigs, robes, and files until the courtroom smelt of wet wood and damp paper.”

    The fate of courts in Ekiti State is no less disheartening. In that state, “tragedy almost struck when part of the state High Court complex collapsed in July 2023. The then chief judge, Justice Oyewole Adeyeye, sustained injuries. He was later flown abroad for treatment, but never fully recovered. Months later, he died.”

    The courts in the south east are not luckier. “In Imo State, panic swept through the Federal High Court, Owerri, in January, this year, when the building began to vibrate during a session. Lawyers and judges fled for their lives. The structure built under former Governor Rochas Okorocha had long been suspected of structural defects. The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) promptly suspended court activities, calling for safety inspections.”

    This state of affairs in the judiciary is totally unacceptable in a 21st Century Nigeria.

    We call on the National Council of State to review this sorry state and take urgent steps to rescue it from total collapse. Without an efficient judicial process that delivers on the rule of law; the political, economic, and social life of the country is in jeopardy.

  • Courts don’t act in vain

    Courts don’t act in vain

    The message in Wednesday’s verdict by Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court, Abuja, in the now famous N800 billion Rivers State budget passed by a four-man House of Assembly is that courts do not make orders in vain. Whether an order is right or wrong, it must be obeyed until set aside by a higher court. It is not for a party to, on its own, make that decision, as some states’ attorneys-general have been doing. That is contempt.

    Justice Abdulmalik stopped the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) from releasing financial allocations to the state. Will Governor Siminalayi Fubara now see reason to obey the courts and stop implementing the budget? Or will he continue to allow himself to be misled by people surrounding him who claim that the “budget is a process” and as such anybody asking for its non-implementation is ‘daydreaming’.

    Read Also:Fagbemi, Osigwe ask courts to promote peace, development via judgments

    In the face of the many similar court orders on the budget, those people are the “daydreamers”. The court has again spoken. It will do well for the government to obey, just as it exercises its right of appeal. As Justice Abdulmalik said: “the governor’s decision to present the budget to an improperly constituted assembly should not be allowed to stand”. That will be the day when the courts allow illegalities to stand.

  • Oyo Courts jail 36 internet fraudsters in Ibadan

    Oyo Courts jail 36 internet fraudsters in Ibadan

    The Ibadan zonal command of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has secured the conviction and sentence of 36 internet fraudsters to various jail terms before Justices Uche Agomoh and E.U. Akpan of the Federal High Court, Ibadan, Oyo State;  Ladiran Akintola, K.B. Olawoyin, Bayo Taiwo and O.S. Adeyemi of the Oyo State High Court in Ibadan.

    The convicts are Ayodele Victor Ayodeji, Adebayo Kazeem Akanbi, Ajayi Charles Temitayo, Rokeeb Olamide Taiwo, Olaleye Adedolapo Emmanuel, Emiade Azeez Ayotunde, Azeez Ademola, Afolabi Mayowa Akinbobola, Shittu Waheed Adeleke, Franklyn Ibeh Kelechi, Olanrewaju Olaitan Quadri, Olawale Elijah Seyi Awofolaju, Samuel Olayemi Ademeso, Akindele Timothy Olatunde, Sholeye Gideon Olamilekan, Waheed Olamide Ahmod, Lawal Paul Jelili, Asaju Muhammad Numan and Badejo Adefemi Emmanuel.

    Others are: Gomina Dennis Ozaveshe, Adio Hassan Taiwo, Adio Kehinde Hozaine, Adewunmi Adeboye Gabriel, John Oluwatimilehin Moses, Odeniyi Faruk Idowu, Owodunni Monsuru Abiodun, Sanwiyu Niyi Owonifari, Adeyinka Adewale Olujobi, Ogunbiyi Segun Joseph, Ayomide Oniyitan Oluwatosin, Badmus Faruk Kayode, Jimoh Sylvester Enahoro, Azeta Sunday Osaremeh, Lukuman Olatemo, Emmanuel Ebgiri Ogah and Ayomide Ibrahim Ishola.

    The charge against Ayomide Ibrahim Ishola reads: “That you, Ayomide Ibrahim Ishola on or about October, 2018, in Ibadan within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, falsely represented yourself as a female from the United States of America with the name Lawrence Janet to one Ralph Wells via your Google Chat account, which representation you knew to be false and thereby committed an offence of impersonation contrary to Section 484 of the Criminal Code Law Cap 38, Laws of Oyo State, 2000.”

    They were jailed after pleading guilty to one-count separate charges bordering on obtaining by false pretence, possession of fraudulent documents, impersonation and aiding in committing an offence upon arraignment by the Ibadan Zonal Command of the EFCC between April 24 and May 29, 2024.

    All the defendants pleaded guilty to their respective charges when they were read to them in court as prosecution counsel:  Oluwatoyin Owodunni, Modupe Akinkoye, Oyelakin Oyediran, Sanusi Galadanchi, Lanre Suleiman, Mabas Mabur, Shamsuddeen, Umar Abiso, Abiddeen Muhammad, Adamu Sahabi, Fatima Baba, David Olubode and Favour Adewunmi prayed the court to convict and sentence them accordingly.

    Consequently, Justice Agomoh convicted and sentenced Joseph, Oluwatosin and Kayode to one year imprisonment each without an option of fine, Enahoro to ten months imprisonment, while Osaremeh bagged six months imprisonment and Olatemo to four months imprisonment without an option of fine.

    Also, Justice Akpan convicted and sentenced Owonifari to one and a half years imprisonment and Abiodun to one year imprisonment or a fine of N100, 000.

    Furthermore, Justice Olawoyin convicted and sentenced Ishola to one and a half years imprisonment or a fine of N1.5million and Olujobi bagged six months imprisonment or a fine of N400, 000.

    Read Also: Strike: Ekiti workers shut down schools, courts, ministries

    Justice Adeyemi convicted and sentenced Hozaine, Gabriel, Idowu and Ogah to six months community service each without an option of fine, as Idowu forfeited a silver coloured Toyota Camry car with registration number: GBE – 334 – AE to the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    More so, Justice Taiwo convicted and sentenced Ozaveshe to four months community service or a fine of N150, 000 and Taiwo to five months community service or a fine of N150, 000.

    Justice Akintola convicted and sentenced Adedolapo Emmanuel, Ayotunde, Ademola, Kelechi, Quadri and Moses to one year imprisonment each or fines of N50, 000; N100, 000; N20, 000; N30, 000; N150, 000 and N120, 000 respectively.

    Also, Justice Akintola convicted and sentenced Olamide Taiwo, Akinbobola and Adefemi Emmanuel to six months community service each or fines of N50, 000; N150, 000 and N60, 000 respectively.

    Furthermore, Justice Akintola convicted and sentenced Ayodeji, Akanbi and Adeleke to three months community service each or a fine of N20, 000.00 each, while Temitayo, Awofolaju, and Jelili bagged three months community service each or a fine of N30, 000 each.

    Also, Olamilekan, Ahmod and Numan were convicted and sentenced to three months community service each or a fine of N25, 000 each, while Ademeso also bagged three months community service or a fine of N50, 000 and Olatunde to three months community service or a fine of N40, 000.

    Ayotunde forfeited one black Lexus ES 350 car with registration number: GGE – 665 – GY, Quadri forfeited a brown ES 300 vehicle with registration number: MEK – 39 – LK while Moses forfeited a Toyota Camry car with registration number: BDG – 144 – GF.

    Also, Adefemi Emmanuel forfeited one grey coloured Lexus RX 300 vehicle with registration number: LND – 940 – CD with Chassis number: JT6HF1042YO11941, Abiodun forfeited a brown Mercedes Benz with Chassis number: WDC0G4K9GF102450, while Ishola forfeited a grey colour Toyota Highlander with registration number: RSH – 857 – CV.

    Furthermore, Enahoro forfeited an ash coloured Toyota Camry with registration number: ABC – 658 – SE and Osaremeh forfeited one silver Honda Accord with registration number: KTU – 773 – DN among others to the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    All the convicts bagged their imprisonment when they were arrested by operatives of the Commission for internet-related offences. They were charged to court and convicted.

  • ‘Courts now haven for chronic debtors’

    ‘Courts now haven for chronic debtors’

    • NBA Lagos honours jurists at branch dinner

    Intractable delays in adjudication of commercial cases have made the courts a haven for chronic debtors, Managing Director/Chief Executive  Officer of  Polaris Bank, Adekunle Sonola, has said.

    The inefficient system, he noted, also boosts impunity rather than the courts serving as a deterrent to criminality.

    “The weaknesses of the legal/judicial system encourage illicit economic activities.There is a strong correlation between illicit economic activities and the effectiveness of the legal system across countries,” Sonola said.

    He noted that even when a protracted case is eventually decided, the value of the recovered debt would have depreciated massively.

    The consequence, according to him, is that the economy suffers, with many investors afraid of entering into contracts because their rights are not adequately protected and contracts are not effectively enforced.

    “There is a general disregard for contract terms which makes the economy less investible.

    “Many Nigerians reject direct investments when they will not be actively involved in operations and management, as contracts cannot be timely enforced.

    “This makes capital inaccessible, and the economy suffers for it,” Sonola said.

    The Polaris Bank chief delivered the lecture at  the annual dinner of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Lagos Branch, which was held at the weekend.

    He spoke on: “Favourable investment and business environment through legal policy and reforms.”

    Sonola said banks’ inability to effectively use the legal system to get loan defaulters to honour their obligations increases their ‘cost of risk’, which is in turn reflected in loan pricing.

    “An effective legal system must be designed to prevent opportunistic loan defaulters from exploiting vulnerabilities within the system,” he said.

    He, therefore, stressed the need to restore faith in the legal system.

    “The public confidence in the legal system must be rebuilt. This will positively impact businesses and investment.

    “Timely and efficient delivery of justice is imperative for fostering a conducive business environment and instilling confidence in legal processes,” Sonola said.

    He called for specialised courts or commercial tribunals with powers to determine commercial disputes faster.

    Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms, he said, must be a critical part of the system, while court processes should be digitalised.

    The legal system, Sonola believes, must be end-to-end automated as much as practicable and be accessible to all. At the same time, reforms must keep up with the dynamic economic and social environment.

    To him, the importance and criticality of an efficient legal system to businesses, investment and overall economic well-being have not enjoyed proportional public discourse attention, which must change.

    He advised: “Ensure the adequate number of judges with equally adequate remuneration. Continuously review court rules to strengthen process efficiency.

    “Lawyers are critical agents of reformation. They must prioritise justice delivery above playing the legal system

    “Reformation will require support from the Ministry of Justice and the National Judicial Council

    “Government, at all levels, must show commitment and provide the necessary funding.”

    Aside from legal challenges, Sonola said the business environment is also dealing with rising inflation that has hit 27.3 per cent, high-interest rate, foreign exchange illiquidity and volatility, high energy cost which has more than doubled, weak infrastructure base, insecurity, rising risk profile, declining purchasing power, among others.

    Red Also: Perform or be fired, Tinubu tells NNPCL board

    NBA Lagos Branch chairman Olabisi Makanjuola noted that the economy would thrive best if the judiciary is more efficient.

    He said the association would continue to engage with the Bench towards improving the system and strengthening the Bar’s relationship with it.

    Makanjuola, a partner at Olaniwun Ajayi LP, highlighted his administration’s achievements in the past six months in court monitoring, international secondment, continuing legal education, branch building project, member welfare, and Bar and Bench relationships, among others.

    Awards of judicial excellence and individual recognitions were presented to distinguished jurists, including retired Supreme Court Justice Amina Augie, former Chief Judge of Lagos State Opeyemi Oke; as well as Justices Serifat Sonaike, Babatunde Kalaro, Matthias Dawodu, Ayodeji Oresanya.

    Mrs Funke Adekoya (SAN) was recognised as an inspiring icon.

    Twelve members elevated to the Inner Bar as Senior Advocates of Nigeria were honoured. They are Folashade Alli, Bomo Agbebi, Babaseyi Joseph, Kehinde Aina, Abiodun Olaleru, Bamidele Ibironke, Oluwaseyilayo Ojo, Tochukwu Onyiuke, Yemi Adesina, Omoyemi Akangbe, Onyemaechi Adiukwu and Olayemi Badewole.

    Akangbe, a former chairman of the branch, was also honoured for exceptional service to the Bar, while another former chairman Chukwuka Ikwuazom (SAN) and former Assistant Secretary Oyinkasola Badejo-Okusanya were honoured for exceptional service to the Branch

    Immediate-past chairman of the Branch, Ikechukwu Uwanna, now Abia State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, and his Lagos counterpart Lawal Pedro (SAN) received individual recognitions.

    The night of fun, with Comedienne Kiki as compere, featured music performances and prizes for best-dressed lawyers.

  • Our courts should be trusted at home and abroad

    Our courts should be trusted at home and abroad

    • By: Olukayode Ariwoola

    The 2022/2023 legal year which ended on Friday, the 21st day of July, 2023, was robustly adventurous in all ramifications. Even though it presented some visible rough edges, the new legal year has yet, offered us the privileged opportunity to diligently smoothen all the unwieldy terrains and fine-tune everything that may impede a hitch-free progress. I must say with great pride and excitement that during the outgone legal year, we experienced so many positive heart-warming developments in the Nigerian Judiciary. In response to the yearning need for the injection of fresh blood into the nation’s judicial service, we were able to appoint and subsequently swear-in 23 new Judges of the Federal High Court on Wednesday, the 4th day of October, 2023. In the same vein, on Wednesday, the 20th day of September, 2023, Nine Justices of the Court of Appeal were inaugurated to strengthen the seamless dispensation of justice at the appellate level of adjudication in the country. What has been pending for a very long time; even long before I assumed office in June, 2022, is the appointment of Justices to fill the many vacancies that have been created as a result of deaths and retirements of our brother Justices. For the first time in the history of the Supreme Court, eight Honourable Justices were sworn-in to fill the positions vacated by our esteemed colleagues who retired; as well as enlarging the profile of our judicial strength by increasing the number of Justices to an all-time high number of 20 in November, 2020. That, indeed, was first of its kind in our history. If for anything, that interesting development has, to a large extent, increased our adjudicatory capacity and reduced the number of nights we stayed awake as a result of workload. That in itself was a cherry news to the retinue of appellants that throng the Court on a regular basis.

    However, that joyful moment soon paled into lamentation and intense complaints of some sorts from various quarters, as the trend experienced a sudden reversal, owing to the un-fanciful gale of retirement that soon hit the Court, which has, for the very first time in a very long while, brought the number of our Honourable Justices to an all-time low of just 10 Justices. Efforts were made by my predecessor to increase the number but that was unsuccessful before he left office. However, the cherry news is that as soon as I assumed office on the 27th day of June, 2022, I immediately got down to work on this urgent and immediate need in particular. Though we have not gotten them on board yet, I can convincingly assure the litigant public that within a very short while, the Supreme Court of Nigeria will, for the very first time in its history, get the Constitutionally-prescribed full complement of 21 Justices. That is one of the legacies I have been working assiduously to leave behind as it now seems that the Court has been somewhat ‘jinxed’ from meeting its Constitutional requirement since that piece of legislation was enacted several years ago.

    As we adapt the Courts to stand ready for the future, we must not, in any way whatsoever, neglect the fundamentals that underpin the strength of our jurisdiction. Our Courts should be trusted at home and abroad for the high level of respect for the rule of law and the institutional and personal independence of our judiciary. That ought to serve as a major factor in the attraction of this country as a destination for investment and its reliability as an international partner  spheres of human endeavour. We actually expected the independence of the judiciary to be given adequate statutory protection, not just at the Federal level alone but equally at the State level, so that they could be seen to be truly and genuinely independent  ramifications. The rule of law, with all its well understood facets, has been highly questionable since the advent of democratic governance in 1999. It is noteworthy that reputation can take a long time to establish but can be dissolved and completely destroyed in an instant, sometimes, inadvertently, though.

    The rule of law and the holistic independence of the judiciary should always be cherished by all. As the Chief Justice of Nigeria, I will do everything within my ability to make it remain part of my responsibility to nourish. The Judiciary, as it is today, is more deserving of public trust and confidence than ever before; and we are poised to reposition it for effective justice delivery to make our beloved country a destination of note in the observance of the rule of law and tenets of Constitutionalism. Nigeria must move forward in all spheres of life; and we must collectively evolve a society where things must be done right to get the right environment for every right thing to thrive rightly for our collective good.

    The countries which, we, today find leading the comity of nations had long ago shattered the shackles that kept them halted and prevented innovation. There is no gainsaying the fact that research and development are the tools that keep us moving with the pace of the world. If we do not grab on to these essential ingredients of development, we will perpetually lag behind the world. It is yet an unassailable fact that those who remain intransigent to change and improvement never achieve anything meaningful. I have always remained an ardent believer in continuous improvement. As iron had to bear the rigours of fire and hammer before turning into steel, humans need to step outside of their comfort zone to chisel away the dust of lethargy that they gather with time, from their persons.

    The Nigerian Judiciary, over the years, has strove assiduously to carve a reputation for great integrity and independence which will ultimately embolden us to act without fear of intimidation or harassment from the other arms of government. We, the members of the judicial hierarchy have, undoubtedly, inherited a legacy of dedicated collective endeavour by the Bench and the Bar by painstakingly establishing an unbroken tradition of high efficiency, perfect integrity and fearless independence. Let me state it clearly here that the true touch-stone for measuring the success of a Judicial Institution is the degree of confidence reposed in it by the public. It is a solemn pledge that we, as a judicial body, are making at this occasion that we are definitely going to work more assiduously and tirelessly to make our country earn for itself the fullest respect and confidence of both the citizens and the international community. It is germane at this juncture, to reiterate the obvious fact that the judiciary has a special role to play in the task of achieving socio-economic goals enshrined in the Constitution. While maintaining their aloofness and independence, the Judges also have to be fully aware of the social changes in the task of achieving socio-economic justice for the people of our dear country against all odds. I therefore, advise all Judicial Officers serving in our jurisdiction to make books their armour and hard work their armaments to confront the headwinds of ignorance, conservatism and stagnation. It is imperative to know that the world we are, only remembers those who lead from the front and set trends for others to emulate. So, you should never be afraid of setting sails through unchartered territories, provided your knowledge is adequate and your skills are equally well tested. 

    I wish to reiterate unequivocally that integrity is an essential quality of a Judicial Officer; and he must, as a matter of necessity, exhibit the standards of integrity, morality, and good behaviour which he sets for others. In a situation where a Judge decides a case wrongly out of motives, it shakes the faith of the litigant public; and by extension, the whole society. Such a Judge, who does not maintain highest standard of integrity, has no right to continue to occupy the Chair as a Judicial Officer. In the same vein, if a Judicial Officer is found to be corrupt, then, he cannot be allowed to hold such a divine Chair of a Judge. It was Socrates, the great Greek Philosopher, who stated, in clear terms, that four things improve a great Judge. These are: “to hear courteously; to answer wisely; to consider soberly; and to decide impartially.”

    It has been rightly asserted that Judicial Officers, by the nature of their calling, discharge divine functions even though they themselves, as mere mortals, are not divine. I am very much convinced that Judicial Officers at the various hierarchy of Courts in Nigeria are discharging their judicial functions in a befitting manner; but as the Chief Justice of Nigeria, I still strongly desire from all Judicial Officers across Courts to lead a disciplined and principled lifestyle that will enhance their trust and integrity quotient. Judges owe the society a great duty of always deciding cases without fear or favour, affection or ill will, friend or foe. For the umpteenth time, I wish to honestly assure all judicial officers that if you are discharging your functions as an upright judicial officer by genuinely following the norms, then you have no cause to be afraid or feel intimidated by the often frivolous complaints or vitriolic attacks made by persons having vested interest.

    However, I expect every judicial officer to work very hard and also be very honest and courteous to the litigants, witnesses and members of the Bar, and discharge all your judicial functions with all the humility at your command. Even while doing this, it is still necessary to have at the back of your minds that public opinions, sentiments or emotions can never take the place of the law in deciding the cases that come before you. The law remains the law, no matter whose interest is involved. In all we do, as interpreters of the law, we should endeavour to severe the strings of emotion from logic and assumption from fact. We should never be overwhelmed by the actions or loud voices of the mob or crowd and now begin to confuse law with sentiment or something else in deciding our cases. Nevertheless, unnecessary and unwarranted utterances are bound to embarrass not only others, but the Judge himself; thus what should be asked, should be asked, and what should not be asked, should be avoided. I admonish our Judges to, as usual, receive what is tendered in Court and eschew what is against the Law and facts after thorough analysis and assimilation both in and out of Court, which exercise is, of course, part of Judgeship.

    The Caesar’s wife must be above board! Your image and reputation both inside and outside the Court must be pristine and crystal clear to all and sundry. Like I said earlier, be bold in all your judgments by deciding cases without fear or favour, because fear and favour come in many hues and colours. For instance, fear of one’s own past, of peer pressure, of public criticism, etc. Like some people often misconstrue, favour does not only come in monetary term, but also through nepotism, personal bias and prejudices. We should all know that if the faith of the people is to be maintained in the Judiciary, then the river of judicial process has to be kept pure. On that basis, we must eschew fear and favour at all cost. If the people think your judgment is biased, is tainted, is partial, they would doubt the judicial process and the river of justice will stand contaminated. No doubt about that!

    Therefore, it is our solemn responsibility to keep the river clean at all times. Needless to say that impartiality is the hallmark of a Judge. So, I admonish all of us to always be impartial in all our judgments. I am saying all these now because I will never have this great privilege and opportunity to address the galaxies of legal luminaries, judicial icons and distinguished personalities in the justice sector of our dear nation in another legal year of the Supreme Court as Chief Justice of Nigeria in my entire lifetime again.

    The Corruption and Financial Crime Cases Trial Monitoring Committee (COTRIMCO) was inaugurated in 2018 by the former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice W.S.A Onnoghen, GCON, with the sole aim of fast-tracking the trial of corruption and financial related crimes in the country. The Committee, which is headed by a retired Justice of the Supreme Court, Hon. Justice Suleiman Galadima, CFR, has been working assiduously with various heads of Courts, to ensure that there is a remarkable rise in the dispensation of corruption and financial crime cases in the country. With the impressive effort they put in during the last legal year, some commendable results were achieved in the disposal of cases. This achievement was brought about as a result of increased and continued vigilance of the Committee. The two leading anti-graft agencies in the country have also been trying to amplify the war against corruption. The ICPC was able to successfully secure a total number of 10 convictions while the sister agency, EFCC was able to secure 1,094 convictions within the same period under review.

    The matters filed at the Supreme Court from the 12th day of September, 2022 to the 11th day of July, 2023, are 1,271, comprising of motions and appeals. Out of these, we heard 388 political appeals, 215 criminal appeals, and 464 civil appeals. Similarly, the court considered a total number of 49 criminal motions, 153 civil motions, and 2 political motions. Between the 30th day of September, 2022 and the 11th day of July, 2023, the Supreme Court delivered a total number of 251 judgments.

    Out of these, 125 were political appeals, 81 were civil appeals and 45 were criminal appeals. Within the period under review (precisely 10 months’ duration), a total number of 91 Rulings were delivered by the Honourable Court. To a very large extent, I will confidently say that this score-card is impressive, fascinating and appreciable in view of the unpleasant events that dotted the legal year, especially the attenuating number of Justices on the Supreme Court Bench, which has to do with some challenges that could not easily be surmounted by one arm of government alone. I attribute the tremendous successes recorded in the course of the last legal year by the Honourable Court to the doggedness exhibited by my industrious and team-spirited brother Justices and the general staff. You are all greatly appreciated.

    Even as we celebrate the successes recorded in the past legal year in the disposal of cases, I would like to admonish all Nigerians on the imperative of being less litigious and be more disposed to alternative dispute resolutions to free the courts of this unnecessary over-stretching of both human and material resources. I have made it clear at different occasions that it is not every dispute that must find its way to the court; and it is not every matter that must come up to the Supreme Court on appeal. Our laws have to be amended to make most appeals to end at the Court of Appeal, which is competent, dexterous and well-equipped with the right materials and manpower to adjudicate effectively and resourcefully. In every dispute, only one party must win; and winning could come after intense legal fireworks that is transparent and based solely on subsisting laws of the land. We cannot import foreign laws to try our cases here, as some litigants would erroneously and desperately want us to do in the quest to get victory.

    Read Also: Ogun partners UK govt on public transportation

    If we really want to make progress as a nation and collectively build a virile legal framework that will serve our interest to the best of its ability, we must begin to have a change of attitude. We are not only here to celebrate the new legal year but to equally speak truth to ourselves and also purge ourselves of most of our wrongdoings and misadventures. The agglomeration of all these problems and mind-set has, largely, accounted for the several appeals that are currently pending in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal, too. The good news I would like to share here again, is that the Alternative Dispute Resolution (Mediation) Centre of the Supreme Court has been fully furnished and equipped with both materials and personnel to function effectively and efficiently. Very soon, I will inaugurate the Centre for full operation. So, we should begin to take advantage of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to resolve some of our disputes with a view to cutting down the cost of litigation and also free the Courts from case-overload.

    On the 15th day of February, 2023, I issued the Supreme Court Pre-Election and Election Appeals Practice Direction, 2023. That came on the heels of the inauguration and training of hundreds of Election Petition Tribunal Members that were billed to adjudicate on all petitions emanating from the 2023 general elections and the succeeding off-cycle elections in the country. All the tribunals across the country have endeavoured to work assiduously to deliver judgments within the time permitted by the Electoral Act and allied subsisting legislations. I commend them for conducting themselves within the ambit of the law. However, I expect members of the public who have any complaints bordering on any form of untoward behaviour or misapplication of the law by any member of the tribunals to channel such to the National Judicial Council for prompt action, as I will not condone any form of malfeasance or nonchalance from any judicial officer in the tribunal or regular Court.

    My Lords, distinguished invited guests, ladies and gentlemen, as we all know, the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria comes with so much prestige and greater responsibilities, too. Those conferred with the rank automatically become members of the Inner Bar and Apostles of the Temple of Justice. It is an honour no conferee can afford to take for granted. The Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee had painstakingly screened and diligently assessed all the documents submitted by the applicants before arriving at its decision. Even though there is no human system that could be adjudged to be infallible, however, with the effort and commitment invested in the exercise by the Committee, I can say confidently and assuredly that they have done remarkably well. I sincerely appreciate your dedication, commitment and sacrifice throughout the duration of the screening, inspection, interview and final announcement exercises. The Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria and All Matters Pertaining to the Rank, 2022, require very high standards of merit from all the applicants vying for the award. Every requirement contained in the guidelines was observed before arriving at the final list.

    The number of applicants for 2023 Senior Advocate of Nigeria Award was 114. Out of this number, 101 are advocates and 13 are academics. The total number of 

    qualified applicants shortlisted after the Advocates 1st and 2nd Filtration Stages, Academic Pre-qualification, Academic 2nd Filtration Exercise, the Independent Appeals Hearing and Chambers Inspection Exercise, etc., was 69; comprising 57 advocates and 12 academics. After conducting the specified screening and filtration exercises which include a number of appearances in superior courts, recommendations by Hon. Justices of the Supreme Court and Hon. Judges of superior courts, Chamber inspections; approval on eligibility and integrity of the candidates from the Nigerian Bar Association, Body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria and, of course, the general public, amongst others, the LPPC came up with 58 successful candidates who, by all standards, can be regarded as eminently deserving of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. Out of this number, 57 are advocates while one is an Academic. This is, indeed, heart-warming and exciting; particularly for those who have accomplished this remarkable feat.

    On behalf of my learned brother Justices of the Supreme Court and members of the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee, I sincerely congratulate the 58 successful Senior Advocates that have just been sworn-in. No success comes easy in life because a lot of sacrifices and hard work are often invested. You have laboured so hard for it, so you deserve every privilege, honour and pride that comes with the rank. The LPPC deserves enough commendation for endorsing the elevation of these eminent 58 Legal Practitioners who have, from all indications, show-cased unassailable professionalism and excellence in legal practice.

    As Senior Advocates of Nigeria, you now carry heavy burden on your shoulders. From the moment you leave this Courtroom, everything in you and about you will now be freely scrutinized and dissected by everyone that comes in contact with you. There is nothing like private life for you henceforth, as whatever you hitherto regarded as private life will now be treated as public life by members of the public; and there is nothing you can do about it. So, watch your utterances, watch your actions and watch the kind of company you keep, because you have already assumed the role of Ministers of the Court, as you are now expected to assist the Court to attain justice, equity and fairness in all ramifications. You must display enormous integrity, self-discipline and high standard of advocacy as custodians of justice. The privilege you are conferred with today does not, in any way, make you superhuman because humility and self-control still remain the essential tools to engage in wrestling the foibles of life. Unfortunately, however, after attaining this rank, some Senior Advocates would instantly become mere casual visitors to courtrooms, as they now see themselves to be too big to appear in court. I am using this very important occasion to tell you all that this is the most auspicious time to make your presence regular and significant in the court.

    Before I end my speech, I would like to express my warm gratitude and appreciation to everyone that has decided to be physically present here today to witness this very important programme heralding the 2023/2024 legal year. We are very grateful to you all for according us this great honour, even at the expense of your very demanding schedules. I also wish to express my appreciation to the Hon. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN; the Chairman of the Body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria; the President of Nigerian Bar Association, Hon. Yakubu Makyau, SAN; and, of course, the spokesperson for the newly conferred Senior Advocates of Nigeria, Mr. Felix Ota Offia, SAN for graciously accepting our invitation to address this very important gathering.

    Thank you very much for spending your precious time with us. I wish you all journey mercies back to your respective destinations.

    •Ariwoola is Chief Justice of Nigeria

  • SGBV: Niger Govt moves to domesticate Family Courts

    SGBV: Niger Govt moves to domesticate Family Courts

    The Niger Government said it has begun arrangements to establish Family Courts to speed up Sexual and Gender Based Violence (SGBV) cases, in order to get justice for the victims in the state.

    Hajiya Hadiza Shiru, Permanent Secretary in the State Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), on the sideline of a free medical outreach yesterday in Minna.

    Shiru said the free medical outreach was organised by the ministry in collaboration with the state office of National Human Right Commission (NHRC) as part of activities to mark the 16 day activism against SGBV.

    She expressed optimism that by 2024, the court would be domesticated and fully operational in the state.

    The permanent secretary said that one of the obstacles militating against victims of SGBV to come and report cases was stigmatisation.

    According to Shiru, on this issue, the Minister of Women Affairs, Mrs Uju Kennedy-Ohanenye, had directed that the victims must be given full protection.

    “She also directed that family courts be established, where all the stakeholders in SGBV will be free to speak out.

    “Here in Niger state, we are working with the Ministry of Justice and the Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA), to speed up the process of establishing family courts in the state.

    “Already, we have set a day aside to visit the Attorney-General of the State to fine-tune the process,” she said.

    Shiru said that there were already existing laws in the state protecting women and children against violence, such as Violence Against Persons Prohibition (VAPP) law and the Child Right law.

    Read Also: Lagos Assembly confirms three Sanwo-Olu’s nominees

    “These laws have been domesticated in Niger state and are fully active,” she said.

    Shiru said that there had been several reported cases of child abuse, defilement, Gender Based Violence in the state.

    “We have been dealing with reported cases, we have done everything possible to protect those who reported their cases, toward getting justice for them.

    “Already we have over 1,700 cases of GBV cases reported in the state this year, out of the figure we have secured 20 prosecutions,” she said.

    In his remark, Dr Nuhu Mohammed, the State Coordinator, NHRC, said that the 16 day exercise against GBV was an annual international campaign from Nov. 25 to Dec. 10.

    Mohammed said that the theme for the 2023 event; “Invest to Prevent Violence Against Women and Children,” focusses on the importance of financing different prevention strategies to end violence against women and girls.

  • Labour strike cripple ports, courts, schools activities in Lagos

    Labour strike cripple ports, courts, schools activities in Lagos

    The strike embarked upon by the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress of Nigeria (TUC) has paralysed activities at some business areas, schools, and other public places in Lagos state.

    Lagos courts on Wednesday, November 15, shut down in full compliance with the strike.

    The Nation reports that the last sitting of the coroner inquest into the cause of death of the late rapper, Mohbad which was adjourned to Wednesday, November 15, was stalled by the ongoing two-day-old workers’ strike as security officials at the court, refused magistrates and judiciary staff entry into the building.

    As a result, many litigants and court customers lamented the effect of the strike on judicial processes.

    A court official said that the closure of the courtroom was a result of the absolute adherence to the industrial strike action.

    The indefinite strike was called by the two unions to protest the assault of the NLC president, Joe Ajaero, and some other executives of the congress in Owerri, Imo state, on November 1, as well as the pending labour issues in the state.

    Read Also: Oshiomhole to Ajaero, Osifo: strike is misplaced priority

    The Nation also observed the activities around markets places like Ladipo, Agege, Oshodi/Isolo and other was devoid of the usual ‘hustling and bustling’.

    Schools (public) were not left out as pupils and students were seen returning home as they were sent away by the school authorities in the observance of the ongoing labour strike action.

    A secondary school student in the Isolo area of Lagos state explained though classes were held on Wednesday, they were, however, asked by their teachers to return home because of the ‘strike’.

    The NLC Public Relation Officer (PRO), Lagos chapter, Adejumo Ismail, who spoke to The Nation on Tuesday evening assured full compliance in the state on Wednesday, owing to the ‘level of mobilisation and sensitisation’ of their members.

    He admitted the ‘partial’ compliance on Tuesday was a result of the ‘late notice’ as the organised labour had announced a nationwide strike with its commencement from Monday midnight.

    The Maritime Workers Union of Nigeria (MWUN) on Tuesday, joined other affiliate unions of the Nigeria Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress to enforce a nationwide strike at the seaports.

    The Apapa and Tin-Can port facilities were all under lock and key as terminal operators suspended their operations. Facilities were shut against the stranded freight forwarders in total compliance with the strike action.

    A few port officials and clearing agents were seen gathered around the gate since they were unable to gain entrance into the port. Trucks were also observed to be stranded on the access roads due to their inability to enter the port.

    The APM terminal in Apapa in a notice to its clients informed that its services will be unavailable for the duration of the indefinite strike. But noted once the strike, which it said began on Monday, November 13, ends, operations will resume at the terminal.