Tag: ‘crazy’ bills

  • CPC summons DISCOs over alleged ‘crazy bills’

    CPC summons DISCOs over alleged ‘crazy bills’

    Inundated with consumer complaints over exploitative electricity billing, the Consumer Protection Council (CPC) has summoned all electricity Distribution Companies (DISCOs) in the country to a hearing over alleged outrageous billings, based on estimated consumption.

    The CPC, in response to complaints of electricity consumers on estimated billings and non-provision of meters, summoned each of the DISCOs, warning that absence of any of the companies at the hearing would be regarded as a violation of its enabling Act.

    The CPC, in a letter dated August 26, this year and signed by its Director-General, Mrs. Dupe Atoki, September 7 this year for hearing on the complaints.

    The agency, in its letter, stated that it “has been inundated with complaints commonly referred to as ‘crazy billing’, through which DISCOs are alleged to arbitrarily determine consumption level of consumers of electricity and bill them accordingly”. It  added that it also “received complaints that many consumers have paid for meters for periods spanning over 12 months, but are yet to be supplied same by their respective DISCOs”.

    It pointed out  that pursuant to these complaints, it has decided to commence investigation to “enable your organisation as well as other DISCOs make representation and state your position regarding the said complaints, particularly as they affect consumers in the area of your coverage.

    “You are, therefore, by this letter summoned to attend, make representation and submit a status report on the aforementioned complaints in your area of coverage, including any other document or evidence, to support your position at the hearing”, the Council declared.

    CPC, in its letter, cautioned the DISCOs to be “guided by Section 18 of the CPC Act that criminalises disobedience of its summon, which include neglect or refusal to attend and testify before the Council or to answer any lawful enquiry or to produce any document as may be required”.  It advised  the companies to “note that, whether you attend or not, far reaching decisions, which may be of consequence to your operations, may be taken after the hearing”.

  • Who will save Nigerians from PHCN’s crazy bills?

    Who will save Nigerians from PHCN’s crazy bills?

    SIR: That the services of PHCN is highly epileptic throughout the country is stating the obvious. The citizens have resigned themselves to fate as the fact remains that the government they put in place to make lives liveable seems helpless to tackle the monster. But the posers now are: Why is Government/PHCN killing the helpless and the hapless masses with crazy and ambiguous monthly PHCN bills? In the face of continuous blackout, when were these electricity units consumed?

    Consider the situation in Ado Ekiti where I reside. Let us assume there are average of 720 hours in a month (i.e. 24 hours X 30days). Ado residents hardly get 100 hours for a month. These few hours of electricity mentioned are either during midnight or few hours when people have gone to work. As soon as people are waking up around 5.30am or when people are returning from work, the light would go off. Again, there are several days light would not even blink!

    The funniest thing is that by the middle of the month, PHCN would start distributing bills ranging from N2,500 to N3,200 per month per household! This is a country where N18,000 is the minimum wage. If people fail to pay on time, the connecting wire would be cut off, thereby using force to rip off hapless people. Must these ugly scenario continue? I continue to wonder, if the commodity is 80% available an average household would cough out almost half salary to pay PHCN bills in a month.

    I hereby use this medium to appeal to the government/relevant authorities to come to the rescue of the masses from this oppression and consider making electricity regular and affordable costs to the masses; If the above task is too tall to be met, reduce drastically these killing bills. They should also ensure, in no distant future, that all electricity consumers, get pre-paid metering system at minimal or no cost.

    Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) Civil Society Organizations, Human Rights activists and our elected lawmakers should come to the aid of the masses. They should not watch helplessly and allow the octopus called PHCN to impoverish the masses more.

     

    • Sanmi Olofinmuagun

    Basiri, Ado Ekiti.

  • Customers decry PHCN’s ‘crazy’ bills

    Customers decry PHCN’s ‘crazy’ bills

    The billing system of the electricity distribution companies of the unbundled Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) has gone arwy and customers are complaining, writes EMEKA UGWUANYI.

    Customers of the electricity distribution companies unbundled from the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) are angry over what they described as unreasonable bills from the utility provider.

    The customers, particularly those who don’t use prepaid meters, are paying through their noses even when the expected uninterrupted power supply promised by the government remains a dream.

    Following complaints from the customers, our correspondent visited some undertakings and business units of the distribution companies in Lagos to ascertain the cause of the recent exorbitant bills. It was discovered that customers affected in the high billing include those in Residential One and Two (R1&2) category of MYTO 11 (Multi-Year-Tariff-Order), who according to the Electricity Power Sector Reform Act, are not only expected to pay low tariff, but also be protected from undue high tariff in order to enable them have access to power supply.

    At the undertaking and business unit levels, half of the customers acc osted came with complaints of high billings. Some of the bills were as high as N30,000 for households of two and three bedroom flats, who don’t even use air-conditioners in their houses.

    Some of the customers said the high billing started from September. For instance, Ajibola Akande who lives within the network of Festac Business Unit said in September he was billed N14,000, in October, over N18,000 and in November, ove N27,000. Also a customer under the Shomolu Buisness Unit, Mr. Julius Ogbonna said he got N14,000 in October and N29,000 in November. He said when he complained, he was asked to go and pay first so they (PHCN) would find a way of resolving future bills.

    The implication of this outrageous billing is that it might make customers lose confidence and trust in the power sector reform and promises of the government in making power affordable by low income earners, he added.

    Some of the officials of the Buisness Units who spoke in confidence to The Nation, said the marketers create a lot of problems for them by not reading the meters. They noted that even if customers have faulty meters or their meters are inaccessible, they (marketers) should endeavour and properly determine the consumption level of a customer before estimating his bill.

    “When we see customers mill around here, we don’t feel good because what we preach and expect to attain is commendable service delivery and customer satisfaction but we are working on resolving this issue of crazy billing but you know this cannot be achieved overnight,” they said.

    At the Quarterly Power Summit in Lagos organised by the Power Ministry, the Chief Executive Officer, Benin Electricity Distribution Company Effiong Umoren also highlighted on the issue of tariff. He said that it is very imperative to get the issue tariff right in order to get the privatisation and reform aspirations right.

    In his paper entitled: Market performance under the implementation of MYTO 11, prospects and challenges: Operator’s perspectives,’ he noted that the tariff structure needs to be slightly adjusted.

    He said: “Unless we are banking on periodical government bailout, the tariff structure is one single component in the power equation that decides the survival or otherwise of the electricity supply chain, we must get it right.”

    He identified major features of MYTO 11 as increase in energy and fixed charges across the various tariff class, abolished payment for meters and connection fees by customers, abolished meter maintenance fees effective from December 2011, disallowed payment of statutory charges for maximum demand (MD) customers: inspection and survey fees, testing fees, metering and commissioning fees, reduced tariff classes from 19 to 14, merger of all the low energy users in each class: R, C, D, and A and collapse of all charges in each category into only two components: Fixed charge and Energy charge and removal of KVA component from MD bills.

    He also noted the major benefits of MYTO 11, which he said discourages fraudulent classification of customers from R3 to R2 by under declaration of load demand and reduction in energy theft. He said that due to free meters, customers stealing energy are now coming out for free meters and regularisation of supply status.

    On challenges of MYTO 11, he identified among others, the unrealistically high fixed charge of N139,466 for a wide segment of D2 customers: small scale industrial customer, saw millers, aluminium and steel product makers, confectionary manufacturers adding that on high fixed charge of N25,018 on R3, “we have some instances where fixed charge is up to three times the energy charge; particularly on “seasonal and weekend” residential houses.

    He said that kva as a component of a tariff encourages more efficient machinery, thus improving system voltage profile noting that its abolition in MYTO II will increase ‘power factor indiscipline’ putting avoidable burden on terminal equipments. Power factor efficiency requires additional investment on the part of customer. There is no more incentives for this investment, he added.

    To discourage energy theft or illegal connection, the stakeholders said the tariff structure should be properly addressed and has to start from elimination of crazy billing.