Tag: critics

  • Buhari, critics and Next Level 2019

    SIR: One of the attributes of great leaders is the mastery of the art of pro-activeness, especially at very critical moments of nationhood.

    Unfortunately, this art is almost alien to most of our leaders as they are caught napping at times when they are expected to rise to the occasion, leading to a yawning gap between African countries and the developed world in terms of growth and technological advancement.

    It was therefore a thing of joy when President Muhammadu Buhari, not wanting to be bitten by this terrible bug launched next level, 2019, a compilation of his achievements and plans for a second term. This no doubt is remarkable as it is a demonstration on the part of the president that he is truly serious about leading the nation again to consolidate on the achievements of the last few years.

    Aside from providing an insight into the journey of the present administration so far, next level 2019 gives detailed information about the administration’s plans for the future. This no doubt is very crucial as it lets the reader into the much – needed details that could be used in assessing the performance of the Buhari administration in all critical sectors as opposed to speculation or hearsay.

    The question really is: can the achievements of Buhari over three and a half years in critical sectors of our economy – agriculture, solid minerals, power, infrastructure, health, anti – corruption etc. be waved aside by discerning Nigerians?

    Can anyone say he does not desire railways working across the nation as being carried out by the Buhari administration, especially since this government kick started this project some years back?

    Would anyone kick against the on – going efforts to make our airports world-class as demonstrated with the Port Harcourt Airport, and the successful construction of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja second runway by this administration?

    Does anyone hate the on-going social intervention projects aimed at breaking the artificial wall between the rich and the poor through Trader moni and other empowerment schemes to lift the poor out poverty as demonstrated by the Buhari administration?

    Even the Southeast where President Buhari administration recorded the least votes has about 70 ongoing projects across the zone, with more to come. This is what the next level 2019 is all about as it all about the Nigeria of our dreams.

    Now is the time for all hands to be on deck by supporting PMB for a deserved second term in office.

     

    • Emma Umohinyang, Lagos.    
  • Falz chides critics of ‘This Is Nigeria’ video

    Award-winning rapper, Folarin Falana, better known as Falz, has released a clip in which he addresses the criticisms that trailed the release of his ‘This is Nigeria’ video.

    The video, which has been described as a State of the Republic address, is the remake of American singer and actor, Donald Glover’s ‘This is America’ which was released on Saturday, May 5.

    Known by his stage name, Childish Gambino, Glover’s video sparked discussions on gun control, racism and violence within the American context.

    In a similar fashion, Falz’s video, which was released last weekend and mirrors Glover’s, touches on issued that boggle the Nigerian system, including political hysteria, internet fraud, the state of the economy, insecurity, religion, lack of medical facilities, herdsmen crisis, and others.

    However, criticism trailed the Nigerian artiste’s 3 minutes-42 seconds video for following the exact pattern of Glover’s video, employing the same visual concept.

    Not one to take the criticism lying down, Falz responded with a 42 seconds clip in which he chided those who have chosen to ignore the message in the song.

    “I just dey read comments online and I dey vex. And I dey vex because I dey see people dey talk say falz tha bahd guy is not original. You copied. Hello, do you think I’m not aware that Childish Gambino is the one that sang the original? You think I’ve not seen ‘This is America?’ Dude, that is the point.

    “This is supposed to be a remake. It is supposed to be a cover. It is not supposed to be original. I’m not trying to make money off it. Now, the sooner you realise that you are supposed to pick up the message, or the numerous messages on the track , the better for your life, the sooner you start to act accordingly, the better for your own personal life. This is not business. This is a moral instruction. Wake up,” he said.

    However, prior to Falz’s response, American rapper, Sean Combs, aka P.Diddy expressed his support for the track when he reposted clips of the video via Falz’s official Instagram page. “Sending love to Nigeria. So many great, beautiful artist changing the game!!!!  @falzthebahdguy,” he wrote.

    Also, former Education Minister Oby Ezekwesili was full of accolades for the singer’s effort. According to her, having watched the video on the instance of her son, she is more than convinced that the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, referencing his activist father, Femi Falana.

    “This apple did not fall far from the tree. This activist-artist brilliantly uses his music to fight for a just and good Nigeria. I love Falz’s brand of music. #FanClub,” she tweeted.

  • Rector slams critics of Bayelsa poly

    The Rector of Federal Polytechnic, Ekowe, Bayelsa State, Dr. Seiyaboh Idah, yesterday slammed those criticising the management, after a student, Adekunle Stephen, got drowned.

    Speaking in Ekowe, Southern Ijaw, Idah lamented the death, but said the claims by critics that the victim died because management failed to provide potable water on campus was false.

    He said the desire of the victim to learn swimming led him to the river, adding that he had been saved twice from drowning.

    The rector said despite warnings by the management against using the river, students, including those unable to swim, still visited the river.

    Idah said it was unfortunate and irresponsible for critics to capitalise on the misfortune and peddle falsehood against the school.

    He said it was time for his critics to allow him work, adding that his enemies had vowed to frustrate the matriculation.

    Idah said: “Enough is enough. What is this? Allow me to do my work. Allow me to make progress. I had matriculation. Some people said it would not happen. But I went ahead to do it. I am not a politician. Leave me to do my job. Don’t distract me by all of these things. It is enough.

    “I’m not here to manage crisis, I’m here to manage a polytechnic and make it move forward, but people are just bringing crisis from all directions at every given opportunity.”

    Narrating how the victim died, he said: “During the orientation, we told the students not to go to the river. This particular boy that died, the dean of Students’ Affairs met him bathing in the river. He doesn’t know how to swim and the man told him to leave the place.

    “This guy had almost drowned twice because he refused to leave the river. I don’t know what his problem was. Twice, he was rescued. There were five students all pushing one another. They didn’t go there to fetch water, but to swim. They have been doing that everyday.

    “Adekunle, we are very saddened by his death, but he did not die because there was no water. Adekunle died because he was overzealous and wanted to know how to swim by all means.

    “We are sad by it, but people should please not use this as an opportunity to fight us. You are supposed to be helping us get out of this, not fighting us. So, we are setting the facts very clear. We are aware that people are being sponsored to fight us with this.”

    The rector lambasted his critics for insinuating that he and workers of the school were operating from the polytechnic’s Liaison’s Office in Yenagoa, instead of the school’s campus in Ekowe, a riverine community in Southern Ijaw.

    He said he locked up the Liaison Office in Yenagoa and forced employees and the management to perform their duties on the main campus.

    “This office has been locked up for sometime now. No staff here. Even some workers are fighting me because I insisted everybody must operate from the Ekowe main campus”, Idah said.

    He lamented that politicians operating within Bayelsa and seeking his removal were the brains behind the attacks on the school management, alleging that they sponsored students to lie against the school.

    The rector said his critics were envious of his modest achievements, as they could not believe the milestones the school had attained within the short period he took over its management.

    He advised persons after him to desist from pulling the school management down.

    Idah said: “We are not the first to have such issues. I don’t see any reason why people should use this as an excuse to say we are not working, especially when this is coming from Bayelsans. People who are supposed to support us to get there are the ones bringing us down.

    “We know that these things are political. There are people that just don’t like the face of the rector, and anything that happens here they must use it to fight this man. Nobody has even said this man has tried, the school is bubbling with students; let’s see how we can support this man.”

  • Tonto Dikeh threatens critics of her revealing dress

    Shortly after posting a picture in a tight-fitting gold sequined gown, exposing her boobs, controversial actress, Tonto Dikeh, has received a backlash from fans who belief the dress sense betrays her claim of being a born again Christian.

    Not one to take such criticisms lying down, the mother of one has taken to her Instagram to warn critics whom she described as haters, threatening to upload more daring pictures if they do not let her be.

    She wrote: “Those of you disagreeing with my outfit on my last post simply because am born again shouldn’t annoy me at all or I will release a bikini picture.

    “My friend calm your self-righteous ignorant selves down, you can’t judge me li lie… Leave that job for God and work on your happiness and appreciation skill. I am joking ooo… But if you come for me I will cyber murder you my nigga.”

    In her caption to the photograph in which she was sporting the dress, the actress described herself as The Alpha Woman (A King).

    According to her: “I am Strong. I am so Damn Beautiful in and out from Head to Toe (Created on a special day). I am a fighter I don’t do pity parties. I am a champion. I am resilient. I create a life and I live it. I don’t put myself down or allow any put me down no more. I am a pro woman. I don’t compete for attention. I am a Drama Queen.”

    “I make money move. I know when a ship has sailed I know when to move. I am straight forward no in between with me (Its either white or black). I don’t give second chances when hurt, I don’t do cliques I am an embodiment of clique all put in one. I invest in my joy purposefully. I know the life I live is intimidating and annoying to a lot of people but I don’t care I live it still.

  • Critics will celebrate my brother in future, says Seid Oshiomhole

    Seid Oshiomhole is the younger brother of former Governor Adams Oshiomhole. He is an aspirant for the House of Asembly. The politician from Estako West Constituency spoke with Osagie Otabor, on his ambition and other partisan issues. 

    Why is the Edo State APC celebrating its victory at the local government polls that were boycotted by the PDP?

    The election went well. It was peaceful and calm. There was no fight and no trouble. The APC did very strong campaigns. The campaigns helped them to do proper awareness. They make the people to know the party is much on ground and committed to  the people. The PDP has a choice. It is their right to withdraw. The legislature has the right to their jobs. If we say whatsoever the state legislated is not good, it is as good as saying the state parliament has no job. We have to be very careful for issues we push for selfish interest. PDP has no capacity to match APC in Edo. Despite the economic problem which was caused by the PDP. People are not well briefed that the problems did not just start. The APC has made people to understand that governance is not for party but for the people. PDP are taking issues so personal because they felt they supposed to remain in power. They took their chances when they were in power, they never believe Nigerians can react.

    Why are you aspiring to be a member of the House of Assembly?

    I think it is my right to contest. I have a right to contest. I have a right to develop interest. I have not formally made any declaration, but people have said they needed me. I know I have what it takes to represent Estako West.

    But, your critics said you should step down because your elder brother is a former governor.

    Is that a constitutional matter? We must not allow personal interest to over rule our constitution. Even, if Adams is my father and he is a sitting governor, I have the right to be his deputy. If he is my father, I have the right to deputise for  him, but nobody questioned the fact that for the eight years Adams was governor, why were his siblings were not appointed or elected into offices. People always have interest. My aspiration should not bother anybody. All they need to look at is the constitution. We have to respect our constitution so that the system can be comfortable for us. It is high time we understood that the constitution is supreme. Whatever policy we are making should be constitutional. If we, as Adams family, were not interested yesterday and today, I know I have something to offer, I have the right to make contributions to good governance governance.

    What new thing are you going to offer to the people?

    The situation determine what to legislate. When we get there we should be able to know what to do.

    How do you feel when the PDP said your brother, Adams Oshiomhole, did not do well in office?

    How can they just wake up and say somebody did not do well? In our school days, they will specify the areas you did not do well but you see somebody going  to the media to say he did not do well. Those are personal interest. Oshiomhole made Edo people to understand that governance is not just about party celebration. I remember in the past, a state Governor will celebrate a three classroom building built by SUBEB. The community will cook but if you look at the level of construction you will see poor and substandard materials being used. The Governor will not be ashamed to commission such building all because he feels he is helping an individual. Did Edo people know that SUBEB can afford to build quality schools before the coming of Oshiomhole? We thought then that whatever a Governor does is not questionable. Oshiomhole personally supervised projects whether he has Commissioners or not. He made sure specifications are adhered to. The style of leadership in Edo has changed today. People should appreciate him because of that. He live with the people. He is never far away from the people. Oshiomhole was assessable and available and committed. Edo people will appreciate Oshiomhole in the future. We only appreciate people when people have exited. We are seeing Godwin starting well and we pray he takes Edo to a high level.

     

  • Senate slams critics of passed bills

    THE Senate yesterday warned critics of bills passed by the National Assembly to desist from misinterpreting such bills.

    This may not be unconnected with the ruling of a Federal High Court, which restrained it from taking further action on the controversial Electoral Act Amendment Bill 2018.

    The upper chamber noted that such alleged misinterpretations of passed Bills, “breeds roadside Appeal and Supreme Courts entities, who always see Bills passed by the National Assembly as either self-serving or infractions on extant laws of the land”.

    It said the critics, most often than not, fail to participate in the process of passing the Bills, even when opportunities are created for participation.

    Senate President Bukola Saraki gave the warning at a public hearing organised by the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters for the consideration of three Bills.

    He noted that it was unfortunate that critics of Bills passed by the National Assembly were never present at legislative forums for the necessary cross fertilisation of ideas.

    Saraki, who was represented at the event by Deputy Senate Leader Bala Ibn Na’Allah, said the Senate did not take preconceived position on the bills before they were passed.

    He listed the Bills as Legal Practitioners Act (Amendment) Bill 2018; Data Protection Bill and Facial Mutilation Prohibition Bill.

    The Senate President said: “No particular position has been taken in respect of these bills. Relevant stakeholders were invited to make input to the bills but unfortunately ardent critics of laws made by us are not here to make their inputs.

    “These critics are no doubt, roadside appeal misinterpreting our laws and by extension turning the decision of the National Assembly upside down as being experienced with one of the bills recently passed and being litigated against.

    “Our appeal to these critics is to stop misinterpreting our laws and make themselves available at the public hearing stage of passing such laws.”

    Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) Abubakar Malami was absent at the public hearing.

    Malami was represented by Yusuf Abdullahi, a lawyer, from the Office of the AGF.

    Chairman of the Committee Senator David Umoru asked Abdullahi why the AGF was absent from the event

    Abdullahi told the committee that the AGF went to court in respect of the litigation against the Electoral Amendment Bill 2018.

    He said the AGF Office has a contrary view on the intendment of the Legal Practitioners Act (Amendment) Bill.

    He noted that it was the view of the AGF Office that certain clauses in the Bill would affect the operation of state counsels.

    President of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN), however, said the proposed amendments to the Act were necessary to address the archaic nature of the Act, having been enacted in 1962.

    He said: “The move by the Senate to amend the Legal Practitioners Act through an amendment Bill is a welcome development because to us, that would help in bringing the needed reforms for the review of regulation of the legal profession.”

     

  • $1b ECA fund and its critics

    $1b ECA fund and its critics

    I think the question as to whether President Buhari needs $1b approved by the governors’ forum for the purpose of ending the Boko-Haram insurgency is legitimate. The latest report of Global Terrorism Index has after-all only recently confirmed that terrorism in Nigeria has decreased by unprecedented 80% in two years compared to 40% in Iraq, 24% in Syria, 14 % in Afghanistan and 12% in Pakistan.  Some have called attention to other demands on government such as decayed infrastructure and unemployment. Some would rather have government go through the National Assembly (NASS) for appropriation if such huge amount is required while a few others believe the governors’ forum has no constitutional right to decide on how the LGA’s part of the excess crude fund is deployed. But as it is often said in this business, the medium is the news. The question is how credible and sincere are some of those now trying to pontificate on how Boko Haram war should be fought.

    Yari, the chairman of the governors forum has explained to Nigerians that   because the governors felt they ‘should not compromise the issue of security for the entire country’ they agreed to forfeit $1bn out of our (their) own share of excess crude ‘to purchase equipment for the military’. Such a decision, he added also happened during Jonathan’s era when they all agreed ‘to withdraw $2bn to procure equipment and logistics for the military’. Of the 32 governors in attendance when the decision was taken, there was, according to him ‘no single opposition’

    Governor Ayo Fayose of Ekiti has however dissociated himself from decision insisting ‘all accruals to the federation must be shared by the three tiers of government’. His argument is that Ekiti’s problem is not Boko Haram but Hunger-Haram. His trenchant cry has since become   “I want my Ekiti money”, asking, ‘Since they said they have defeated Boko Haram, what else do they need a whopping sum of $1bn (over N365bn) for, if not to fund the 2019 elections?’

    For Governor Dickson of Bayelsa however, Fayose was only up to his antics. According to him “Our duty is to collaborate among ourselves, collaborate with the federal government on two critical issues of national security and issues of the economy… and I think that we leaders must be circumspect in terms of creating controversies on issues of national security”.

    The new PDP, like Fayose, was however suspicious, such amount might be diverted to fighting the 2019 election. This is understandable. Both are not strangers to the use of funds budgeted for military hardware and soldiers welfare as war chests. Fayose according to EFCC and Senator Musliu Obanikoro who ferried N3 billion of $2.1 of arms funds from Dazuki Jonathan’s NSA in two aircrafts confirmed Fayose received the money. EFCC has since traced the said amount to personal accounts of Fayose and linked some of the funds to properties he acquired in Lagos and Abuja. Like Fayose, the current PDP leadership was also privy to the sharing of the said military hardware votes by PDP stalwarts and ministers as war chest.

    Unfortunately, since there is no evidence Fayose invested any part of this money in Ekiti, it is difficult to believe his current trenchant cry of “give me my Ekiti money’ is motivated by love for Ekiti. This is also a man who traded off Prof Adeniran, his fellow Ekiti compatriot and the best of all the PDP chairmanship contestants for a possible VP slot in 2019. Fayose, like his brother governors who took Obasanjo to court citing constitutional backing over the sharing of the excess crude oil funds, is driven by anything but the love of Ekiti people.

    And a man who cannot remember it was only yesterday  Obasanjo took him from Adedibu, the Ibadan garrison commander, and made him governor of Ekiti State but now publicly accused him “of opening his rotten mouth to criticize PDP that gave him an opportunity to be a two-term president” adding, “where is Obasanjo today? His era is gone. We are now in charge” cannot be taken seriously if he read motives to President Buhari’s actions.

    While it will be uncharitable to lump other critics together to clowning Fayose, I think three quick observations can be made in respects of the fears they expressed. First, our current federal arrangement is a fraud.  The umbilical cords that link the LGAs together with the states cannot be severed just because of an aberration that the former is funded with other peoples’ resources by a centre they are not answerable to. The governors can legitimately speak for their LGAs.

    The sincerity of those asking Buhari to put his fate in the hands of the current NASS is also questionable. We cannot pretend not to know that ‘the cloak does not make the monk”. There is no difference between David Mark/Ekweremadu’s 7th Senate and its offshoot, the 8th Saraki/Ekweremadu Senate. The former worked against the interest of Nigerians. While it was busy sharing our national patrimony with David Mark leading the way with his confiscation of the Senate President’s mansion, a national heritage, other PDP stalwarts and ministers looted the nation. The 7th Senate was also busy serving its members while Generals stole military hardware and soldiers’ welfare funds resulting in Boko Haram insurgents hoisting of caliphate flags in some conquered areas of the north-eastern Nigeria.

    The latter, Saraki/Ekweremadu 8th Senate has only improved on the baleful legacies of its forbears.  It has for the past two years despite public opinion, served none but its members. They have demonstrated their opposition to Buharis anti-corruption crusade.  Twice they rejected his nomination for the chair of EFCC for no other reasons than he had earlier investigated corruption cases against some of their members. President Bubari’s Special Anti-corruption Court bill named “Special Criminal Courts Act” has remained unattended to since last year. The Anti –money Laundry Bills have been in the Senate since 2015. And without the passage of this anti-corruption courts legislation, special anti-corruption courts cannot be created to speed up corruption trials. For now, the over N2trillion recovered looted funds cannot be used for the benefit of the people since the cases are still going to the Supreme Court.

    And lastly, with nothing but sabotage coming from  the legislature, the judiciary and even some segments of the media, we seem to have forgotten that Buhari as an elected sovereign in a democracy cannot cite these impediments  as excuses for not fulfilling his electoral promises at the end of four years.  As a democratically elected sovereign, he is allowed to employ blackmail, intimidation and stick and carrot approach and if needs be, only the stick for the greater good of the greatest number of people in society according to his interpretation. (This is currently going on in Trump America, the home of democracy).

    The problem with President Buhari is that he has been too timid to use the power of the sovereign. This was perhaps why exasperated Itse Sagay said not too long ago that the enemies of Nigeria in the National Assembly are lucky he was not the President. In a democracy, the tale does not wag the dog.

    And finally, I think it will be short-sighted to cite the near or total defeat of Boko Haram as excuses for not equipping our armed forces for future challenges. There must be something to learn from our recent history. Obasanjo and Yar’Adua saved for the raining day but probably paid less attention to our armed forces. And after Jonathan and PDP, like Epicureans ate everything kept in their care for our tomorrow,  all we had when Boko Haram struck, was an army that could not  defend its own barracks where Generals died while literarily protecting their families members under Boko Haram siege inside a church with their bare hands.

  • Critics of anti-corruption war are treasury looters

    Critics of anti-corruption war are treasury looters

    I commend those behind the formation of the Anti-Corruption Situation Room (ACSR). I understand they include civil society organisations, media groups and government agencies.

    The essence, I am told, is not just to promote transparency and accountability in government but also to ensure that the people take ownership of the fight against corruption.

    For us in government, this is music to our ears. Music to our ears because we have been saying that the fight against corruption is not Buhari’s fight, neither is it APC’s fight.

    It is Nigeria’s fight. This means all Nigerians must take possession of this war if we are to win it. The courageous and patriotic minds behind the Anti-Corruption Situation Room have taken the first critical step to ensure that Nigerians buy into this war.

    I thank the Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA Resource Centre) and its partners for coming up with the ACSR. I appeal to more civil society organizations to join this initiative. Unless there is a collaboration that involves the government, the media, CSOs and others, this fight will be tougher than it should be.

    Mr. Olanrewju Suraju, Chairman of HEDA Resource Centre, puts it most succinctly when he said, and I quote: “The central thrust is to build synergy between anti-corruption CSOs, the labor movement and law enforcement agencies, the parliament and the judiciary as a means of improving and broadening the anti-corruption agenda as well as creating an accountability loop and feedback mechanism between anti-corruption agencies, the civil society organizations and the citizens”.

    The ACSR could not have come at a better time. The Buhari Administration’s fight against corruption is gaining momentum, and the government is winning the war. But there is a challenge: there seems to be a feeling of numbness among the citizens about the conduct of those whose actions brought us here, those who looted the national treasury dry.

    Suddenly, these same people are engaging in revisionist history and blaming everyone but themselves for the mess their actions put the country into.

    Those who turned our treasury to their piggy bank are once again presenting themselves as the saviours of the nation. They say the best time for Nigeria was when the proceeds of their corruption subsidized many and gave the illusion of economic boom.

    They are so emboldened as to say Nigerians are earnestly yearning for them. No contrition. No apologies. No shame. Just sheer bravado. Unbridled arrogance. Revisionism.

    The civil society, the media and indeed all Nigerians owe it a duty not to allow Nigerians to forget, to say ‘Never Again’ to those who view Nigeria as nothing but a cash cow to be milked to death.

    How can we ever forget? The 2.1 billion dollars meant to buy weapons for the Nigerian military to fight Boko Haram was turned into a slush fund by a few, causing the war to fester and hundreds of troops to die. How can we ever forget that we spent billions of dollars on power only to have just 2,690 megawatts, which was what we inherited when we assumed office 29 May 2015?

    Why is it that despite the billions of naira supposedly spent on roads by successive administrations, what we inherited are death traps. Why did we inherit an economy in dire straits? Nigeria sold oil at over 100 dollars per barrel for years, but the proceeds were either looted or frittered away.

    Yet, this Administration has decided to take the bull by the horns, rather than sit back and lament. That is why we are fighting corruption headlong. It is the toughest of the three cardinal programmes of this administration, but we are determined to win the fight, and we are winning, even when corruption is fighting back fast and furious.

    Because we are tackling corruption, we have succeeded in raising power generation from 2,690 to an all-time high of 7,001MW. Because we are tackling corruption, we are saving 25 billion Naira monthly by cutting unnecessary allowances of officials.

    Because we are tackling corruption, we have added 500 million dollars to our Sovereign Wealth Fund that stagnated at the 1-billion-dollar that was used to set it up.

    We have raised our foreign reserves from 23 billion dollars to 38 billion dollars. We have stopped the payment of phantom subsidy of between 800 billion and 1.3 trillion Naira.

    We recovered at least 43 million dollars and 56 houses from just one official of the immediate past administration. We have recovered 2.9 billion dollars from looters so far. Our Whistle-blower policy has led to the recovery of 151 million dollars and N8 billion in looted funds from just three sources.

    Our sincere and full implementation of the Treasury Single Account, or TSA, has yielded 3 trillion naira, almost half of the estimated revenue in the 2018 budget. With the elimination of thousands of ghost workers, we have saved 120 billion naira.

    We have eliminated the 108 billion naira in maintenance fees payable to banks, pre-TSA.

    We can go on and on, reeling out the successes from our fight against corruption.

    It is noteworthy that we have achieved all these and more without having all the stakeholders fully on board in the fight against corruption. Imagine how far we would have gone if all hands have been on deck.

    That is why we are delighted at the launch of the Anti-Corruption Situation Room, which we believe will definitely ensure that more and more Nigerians buy into this war.

    Once Nigerians take possession of the war, there will be no more hiding place for the corrupt. Those accusing the administration of engaging in a selective anti-corruption fight will be exposed for who they are: apologists for treasury looters!

    I congratulate the various groups that have come together to form the ACSR. It is our fervent hope that this will be a game changer in the efforts to ensure that Nigerians take possession of the war against corruption, thus galvanizing the anti-corruption war.

    • Excerpts from speech by Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed at the launch of the Anti-Corruption Situation Room (ACSR)

     

  • Okorocha raps critics, says I’m not running a family govt

    Okorocha raps critics, says I’m not running a family govt

    IMO State governor, Rochas Okorocha, has said that he does not run family government as alleged by some elites in the state. He said that those behind the allegation have missed the point.

    According to him: “More than 4,000 children had gone to university through Rochas Foundation and more than 15,000 of such children are also in the various colleges of the foundation.

    “When some of them graduate, they chose to be with me and I cannot afford to say no to them and if any of such children becomes anything under me, they would say he or she is a member of Rochas family”

    Governor Okorocha spoke when more than five thousand members of the Rochas Mandate Movement held solidarity rally in his honour in Owerri. Okorocha stated further: “Those who never offered the people of the state leadership when they held sway but only shared the people’s resources would never come back to power in the state.”

    He said stressed that “Uche Nwosu (his son inlaw) who is from Nkwerre Local Government Area and Prince Eze Madumere, from Mbaitoli LGA are all counted today members of my family because they have grown to prominence”, adding that “but when they took those steps of faith no one counted them as members of my family.”

    The governor boasted that he has done the state and her people proud with his monumental achievements.

    He also reiterated that he would neither run for Senate nor for the position of the President in 2019, but would be keen in who succeeds him and who can sustain the tempo of the achievements recorded by his administration. His words,

    “The people I see here are people who are committed. People that are following me not because of what they could gain from me, but because of what we have done for the world. As it stands, come 2019, I’m contesting for nothing.

    But in my heart, I have searched out and resolved that one man has good thought about Nigeria in his heart. Secondly, the possibility of leadership will easily get to the Igbo after him. That man is President Muhammadu Buhari.”

    He added: “My coming as a leader in Imo State was by your efforts. No big political bigwig supported me and in my stride, I have brought sitting heads of states of other countries to Imo State.”

  • Aregbesola and armchair critics

    Everything has got its own time and season.  The season of politics in Osun State is here. Contestants are warming up.  New alignments are being forged. In other places, old ones are being resuscitated. Forces are gathering all towards the 2018 governorship election.

    Governor Rauf Aregbesola’s tenure is gradually coming to an end.  Dozens of aspirants are targeting this number one seat. All these contestants want to outdo one another in the ascendance to the throne game. One weapon they have and which they are using is propaganda.

    They will perform more than the incumbent if given the opportunity to serve. They have now turned virulent critics of the Aregbesola government.

    They brazenly alter statistics, fabricate figures which are non-existing and justify what ought not to be, all in the name of wanting to give the administration of Aregbesola a bad name in order to hang it.

    But the people of Osun do have very good memory.  They do not suffer from rampaging collective amnesia trait of these politicians. They know.  They see. They also feel what Aregbesola did and is still doing in the state.

    One of the supposed governorship aspirants recently said the state of education in Osun is in a bad shape. He noted that there was a disconnect in the provision of infrastructure and economic development, promising that he possess the magic wand to synergise the two and fix the education.

    Hear what he said: “My governorship ambition will aim at turning the state’s fortunes around, especially in ‘moment of crisis’ which its education had found itself. Osun State is in a moment of crisis as its educational sector is also in bad shape and the quality is no longer there.

    “The infrastructure and economic development will change if given the opportunity to govern the state. Osun is in a critical position; it must not be left in the hands of charlatans. If you’re a governor or aspiring to be governor and you say you have six points agenda or nine points agenda, its rubbish, I’m very sure of that”.

    Another aspirant was milder in his criticism. He opined that Aregbesola performed very well but made certain mistakes that he would correct if elected governor.

    But if a calabash isn’t broken, do we employ someone to still fix it? One of Aregbesola’s critics cited above was fortunately part of the education summit called by the governor in 2011 to fix the education sector ran a ground during the seven years of misrule of the administration before Aregbesola.

    This critic was not a governorship aspirant then and he did not see that education was in shambles. Even at that, he was privileged to serve in the summit with the Nobel laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka.

    The outcome of that brainstorming at the summit produced the template with which the government tailored its restructuring. And today, the state has witnessed tremendous improvement in all ramifications as far as education is concerned in the state.

    The criticism must have stemmed from the utter lack of knowledge of performance charts and attention to details commonly exhibited by those who do not want to see anything good attributed to the Aregbesola administration.

    Before one goes to reel out statistics on physical performance in the education such as provision of infrastructure, let us take a cursory look at the performance of the student of the high school in the state in the last three edition of the external examination,  West African Senior Secondary School Certificate Examination (WASSCE).

    These past records and statistics of students supplied by WAEC in the past years have shown that there is significant improvement in percentage of overall results of the student compared to the 2010 performance pre-Aregbesola era.

    To start with, a comparison between pre and post Aregbesola administrations will put nail to the coffin of mischief makers. In 2007, the state registered 36,171 candidates for WAEC examination out of which 2,483 representing 6.86 per cent had credit pass in five subjects, including English and Mathematics.

    In 2008, it was 37,715 candidates with 3,813 pass, representing 10.11 per cent. In 2009 it was 39,676 candidates, with 5,545 pass, representing 13.98 per cent. In 2010 it was 43,216 candidates, with 6,777 pass, representing 15.68 per cent. If you put these four years together, you will get an average of 15.68 per cent.

    Put side by side the above four-year performances with that of Aregbesola’s administration when government started sponsoring candidates for WAEC in 2011, one would glean the wide gulf in performances of both governments.

    That year, 2011, and the first year of test of Aregbesola’s government, the state fielded 53,293 candidates, had 11,672 pass, representing 21.98 per cent.

    In 2012, government fielded 51,463 out of which 11,431 passed, representing 22.21 per cent. In 2013, it also fielded 47,013 candidates, recorded 9,301 pass, representing 19.78 per cent.

    In 2014, government sponsored 47,672 candidates, 9,316 of them passed, representing 19.54 per cent.

    Taken together,  the average performance for Aregbesola’s first four years was 20.88 per cent. Compared with the average performance (13.26 per cent) of the three years that preceded it, the percentage improvement in performance during Aregbesola’s tenure is put at  an impressive 57.46 per cent.

    Thus, those who said Osun is declining are not being honest. The above data will show that their claims are totally unfounded. The performance of pupils has not gone down under the watch of Aregbesola.

    This significant improvement in performance was nothing other than an outstanding result brought about by careful and strategic planning by the administration. The percentage of performance has kept improving since then. One therefore was miffed by the spurious claims of critics about education being in bad shape in the state. This same education sector!

    Coming to infrastructural improvement,  it is in this same education sector where, as at last count, a total of 55 new state-of-the-art structures, comprising 20 Elementary, 22  Middle, and 13  High schools have been added to existing structures while a total of 82 school blocks, comprising 1,534 classrooms across the state have been refurbished by his administration.

    The same Aregbesola administration established the Home Grown School Feeding Programme (O’MEALS) which, apart from providing pupils in Elementary 1-4 with highly nutritious meals every school day, has also succeeded in reducing unemployment by absorbing no fewer than 3,000 food vendors?

    Another innovation of the Aregbesola administration is Osun Youth Empowerment Scheme (OYES) which, with its mopping up of more than 40,000 youths off our streets and productively engaging them, has succeeded in reducing the scourge of unemployment among our youths.

    Aregbesola has also performed creditably well in bringing government closer to the people, especially through the creation of additional 31 Local Council development Areas, 3 Area Councils and two Administrative Offices.

    On security, with the procurement of 25 Armoured Personnel Carriers (APC) and 100 Patrol Vehicles among others, he has greatly helped in the making Osun one of the safest states in Nigeria.

    Without security, can there be any development? Those who easily can find a disconnection between infrastructure and development in Osun must have been living in a wild jungle.

    The above is just a tip of the iceberg of the development that occurred under Governor Aregbesola, which his most avowed critics could not even deny.

    The conclusion one can draw from these aspirants turned critics is that because they wanted Aregbesola’s job, then they must malign him to curry the support of the people.

    This kite will not fly any time any day again as the people of the state are abreast of what the governor has done for the state.

    No amount of lies will ever deceive and stop them from following the people’s governor.

     

    • Owolabi writes from Osogbo, Osun State.